Patient with high risk for bleeding

Similar documents
ESC Congress 2012, Munich

Anti-thromboticthrombotic drugs

NOAs for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: potential advantages in the elderly patients. Giancarlo Agnelli

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

ANTI-THROMBOTIC THERAPY in NON-VALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Prepared by Pfizer-BMS alliance in response to an unsolicited request Not for further distribution

AF review. Petr Polasek

A Patient Unsuitable for VKA Treatment

TRIPLE THERAPY, NOACs with concurrent indication for DAPT. Paul Wright Lead Cardiac Pharmacist The Heart, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust

GRAND ROUNDS - DILEMMAS IN ANTICOAGULATION AND ANTIPLATELET THERAPY. Nick Collins February 2017

Anticoagulation Therapy in LTC

Fred Kusumoto Professor of Medicine

Indications of Anticoagulants; Which Agent to Use for Your Patient? Marc Carrier MD MSc FRCPC Thrombosis Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Antithrombotics in Stroke management

State of the Art Management on Atrial Fibrillation in Monica Lo, MD, FACC, FHRS April 15, 2016

When and how to combine antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant?

PCI in Patients with AF Optimizing Oral Anticoagulation Regimen

Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Stents: Is Three Drugs Too Many?

Asif Serajian DO FACC FSCAI

NAVIGATING THROMBOSIS AND BLEEDING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND CORONARY STENTING

Antithrombotic Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Etexilate

Individual Therapeutic Selection Of Anti-coagulants And Periprocedural. Miguel Valderrábano, MD

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

controversies in anticoagulation: optimizing outcome for atrial fibrillation

The Poor Long-Term Candidate for Warfarin: NOAC or Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

NUOVI ANTICOAGULANTI NELL ANZIANO: indicazioni e controindicazioni. Mario Cavazza Medicina d Urgenza Pronto Soccorso AOU di Bologna

Optimal lenght of DAPT in different clinical scenarios

Scoring Systems in AF 8/10/2016. Strategies in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Strokes. Overview

Anticoagulant therapy, coumadines or direct antithrombins

AF stroke prevention in the Canadian context

Appendix C Factors to consider when choosing between anticoagulant options and FAQs

The Role of Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: What You Need to Know Now. Bradley A. Hardin, MD Richard F.

Dr Calum Young Cardiologist Tauranga

Antiplatelet and Anti-Thrombotic Therapy. Ivan Anderson, MD RIHVH Cardiology

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2016 Montreal, QC

Anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy in the older patient: Choosing wisely

Update on the NOAC s: 2018 Daniel Blanchard, MD, FACC, FAHA

AF in Andrew Staniforth. Mayo Course March 2014

Basics of Atrial Fibrillation. By Mini Thannikal NP-BC Mount Sinai St Luke s Hospital New York, NY

A Patient with Chest Pain and Atrial Fibrillation

New options in Stroke Prevention in AF Paul Dorian University of Toronto St Michael s Hospital

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: REVISITING CONTROVERSIES IN AN ERA OF INNOVATION

Atrial Fibrillaiton and Heart Failure: Anticoagulation therapy in all cases?

Secondary Preven-on of Thromboembolic Stroke: Clinical Data and Recommenda-ons from the ESC Atrial Fibrilla-on Guideline Update 2012

Byeong-Keuk Kim, M.D. Ph D. Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation JIR-PING BOEY, DEPARTMENT OF HAEMATOLOGY, FLINDERS MEDICAL CENTRE FEBRUARY 2016

Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation An Asian Perspective. Dr Yap Lok Bin Cardiologist

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Era of Novel Anticoagulants

Special Conditions of NOAC PCI 가톨릭의대 순환기내과 장성원

Afib, Stroke, and DOAC. Albert Luo, MD. Cardiology Lindsey Frischmann, DO. Neurology Xiao Cai, MD. HBS

Show Me the Outcomes!

Which drug do you prefer for stable CAD? - P2Y12 inhibitor

Is There a Role For Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics Guided Dosing For Novel Anticoagulants? Christopher Granger

Modern management of atrial fibrillation, from blood pressure control to anticoagulation

NOACs Update PD Dr. Jan Steffel Leitender Arzt, Klinik für Kardiologie Co-Leiter Rhythmologie Universitätsspital Zürich

Direct Oral Anticoagulants An Update

Study design: multicenter, randomized, open-label trial following a PROBE design

Dabigatran Evidence in Real Practice

North Wales Cardiac Network Guidelines on oral antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease

Defining Sub-Clinical Atrial Fibrillation and its management

MODULE 1: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Benjamin Bell, MD, FRCPC

Watchman Implantation Case Presentation and Discussion

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the era of Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) SACIS 2015

Innovations in AF Management

Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Stratification and Treatment New Cardiovascular Horizons St. Louis September 19, 2015

Atrial Fibrillation Topics for Today. Clinical Controversies Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Atrial Fibrillation in the ER Topics for Today

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: The Rationale

DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS

NOAC 2015: What Have We Learned?

The Challenge. Warfarin or Novel Oral Anti-Coagulants in the PCI patient? Anticoagulation/Stroke

Days

Aims. AF and Stroke risk Guidance re anticoagulation Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in non-valvular AF (NVAF) Practical Issues Patient Case Studies

Stable CAD, Elective Stenting and AFib

Dr Chris Ellis. Consultant Cardiologist Auckland City Hospital Auckland

The INR: No Need Anymore? Daniel Blanchard, MD Professor of Medicine Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program UCSD Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center

Current Guideline for AF Treatment. Young Keun On, MD, PhD, FHRS Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

Pharmacologic Agents to Prevent Stroke in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and PFO

Thrombosis and Thromboembolsim October Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Risk Stratification and Choice of Antithrombotic Therapy

Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation

Antithrombotic therapy in CAD patients with concomitant NAFV: why and for whom?

Følgende dias er fremlagt ved DCS / DTS Fællesmøde 13. januar 2011 og alle rettigheder tilhører foredragsholderen. Gengivelse må kun foretages ved

TSHP 2014 Annual Seminar 1

Drug Class Review Newer Oral Anticoagulant Drugs

NOACs in AF. Dr Colin Edwards Auckland Heart Group and Waitemata DHB. Dr Fiona Stewart Auckland Heart Group and Auckland DHB

STROKE PREVENTION 5/11/2015. Stroke Incidence by Age. Cardiogenic Embolism is the most common cause of stroke

Plavix eliquis and aspirin

PRACTICAL MANAGEMENT OF NOAC s December 8,

Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting 경북대의전원내과조용근

Update in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

AF Treatment & Anticoagulation

Updates in Atrial Fibrillation

Dr. Khalid Khan Consultant Cardiologist

Changing Course: Anticoagulation in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Events

Alan Barber. Professor of Clinical Neurology University of Auckland

Atrial Fibrillation Implementation challenges. Lesley Edgar Ross Maconachie

Dr Mammen Ninan GPwSI in Cardiology

Aspirin at the Intersection of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy An Act of Commission?

심방세동과최신항응고요법 RACE II AFFIRM 항응고치료는왜중요한가? Rhythm control. Rate control. Anticoagulation 남기병 서울아산병원내과. Clinical Impact of Atrial Fibrillation

Cryptogenic Stroke: A logical approach to a common clinical problem

Antithrombotic therapy in the ACS patient with atrial fibrillation

Transcription:

Will Apixaban change practice in atrial fibrillation Luncheon Satellite Sponsored by Pfizer Patient with high risk for bleeding Prof. Amos Katz M.D

August 2012: patient background 67-year-old woman History of coronary artery disease Coronary intervention; 12/2006 PCI BMS to RCA Last Coronary angiography; 7/2011, patent RCA, D1 90%, conservative treatment Medical History: Hypertension T2 DM Dyslipidemia Lung bronchiectasis COPD Obesity ; BMI=35 egfr =55 Diagnosis of AF since 2007 DC CV; 2007, 2008, 2009 Rx Amiodarone until 2012 Rx Coumadin until 2011 Coumadin AF DCCV AF DCCV AF DCCV Amiodarone

August 2011: August 2011 labile INR [4.5-7] Major lung bleeding: hemoptysis Coumadin stopped Medications: Aspirin, Metformine, Valsartan, Rosuvastatin Coumadin AF DCCV AF DCCV AF DCCV Amiodarone

Patient with high risk for bleeding Efficacy: All stroke (ischaemic + aemorrhagic) & systemic embolism Safety: Bleeding events (major and minor) Intracranial haemorrhage MI, LFT, Death

Clinical Flowchart for OAC 5

Estimation of Bleeding Risk 6

Bleeding risk scores 7

Comparing C Indexes JACC, 28 August 2012, Pages 861 867 8

CHADS2 Stroke risk Scores CHA2DS2 VASc

HAS - BLED 10

Recommendation for Assessment of Bleeding Risk

August 2011: August 2013 Major lung bleeding: hemoptysis Coumadin stopped Medication: Aspirin CHADS2=2= 4% risk, CHA2DS2 VASc=5=15.2% risk HAS-BLED=4=8.7% risk Patient background 67-year-old woman CAD HT DM Diagnosis of AF Clopidogrel Coumadin AF DCCV AF DCCV AF DCCV Amiodarone

Patient with high risk for bleeding Efficacy: All stroke (ischaemic + aemorrhagic) & systemic embolism

Stroke or Systemic Embolism NOAC Warfarin No. of events (%/yr) HR 95% CI Dabi 110 171 (1.44) 186 (1.58) 0.91 0.74-1.12 Dabi 150 122 (1.01) 186 (1.58) 0.64 0.51-0.81 Riva (safety AT) 184 (1.65) 221 (1.96) 0.85 0.70-1.03 Apixaban 199 (1.19) 250 (1.51) 0.79 0.65-0.95 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 ITT: Intention to Treat AT: as treated Favors NOAC Favors warfarin Not head to head comparison For illustrative purposes only adapted from references 1-4 1. Connolly et al. NEJM 2009; 361: 1139-51. 2. Connolly et al. NEJM 2010; 363: 1875-6. 3. Patel et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 883-91. 4. Granger et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 981-92.

Patient with high risk for bleeding Safety: Bleeding events (major and minor) Intracranial haemorrhage MI, LFT, Death

Hemorrhagic Stroke NOAC Warfarin No. of events (%/yr) HR 95% CI Dabi 110 14 (0.12) 45 (0.38) 0.31 0.17-0.56 Dabi 150 12 (0.10) 45 (0.38) 0.26 0.14-0.49 Riva (safety AT) 29 (0.26) 50 (0.44) 0.59 0.37-0.93 Apixaban 40 (0.24) 78 (0.47) 0.51 0.35-0.75 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Favors NOAC Favors warfarin ITT: Intention to Treat AT: as treated. Not head to head comparison For illustrative purpose only adapted from references 1-4 1. Connolly et al. NEJM 2009; 361: 1139-51. 2. Connolly et al. NEJM 2010; 363: 1875-6. 3. Patel et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 883-91. 4. Granger et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 981-92.

Intracranial Bleeding NOAC Warfarin No. of events (%/yr) HR 95% CI Dabi 110 27 (0.23) 90 (0.76) 0.30 0.19-0.45 Dabi 150 38 (0.32) 90 (0.76) 0.41 0.28-0.60 Riva 55 (0.5) 84 (0.7) 0.67 0.47-0.93 Apixaban 52 (0.33) 122 (0.80) 0.42 0.30-0.58 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Favors NOAC Favors warfarin Not head to head comparison For illustrative purpose only adapted from references 1-4 1. Connolly et al. NEJM 2009; 361: 1139-51. 2. Connolly et al. NEJM 2010; 363: 1875-6. 3. Patel et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 883-91. 4. Granger et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 981-92.

NOAC Warfarin No. of events (%/yr) Major Bleeding HR 95% CI Dabi 110 342 (2.87) 421 (3.57) 0.80 0.70-0.93 Dabi 150 399 (3.32) 421 (3.57) 0.93 0.81-1.07 Riva 395 (3.6) 386 (3.4) 1.04 0.90-1.20 Apixaban 327 (2.13) 462 (3.09) 0.69 0.60-0.80 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Favors NOAC Not head to head comparison For illustrative purpose only adapted from references 1-4 1. Connolly et al. NEJM 2009; 361: 1139-51. 2. Connolly et al. NEJM 2010; 363: 1875-6. 3. Patel et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 883-91. 4. Granger et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 981-92. Favors warfarin

Major Gastro-intestinal Bleeding NOAC Warfarin No. of events (%/yr) HR 95% CI Dabi 110 137 (1.15) 126 (1.07) 1.08 0.85-1.38 Dabi 150 188 (1.56) 126 (1.07) 1.48 1.18-1.85 Riva* 224 (X.XX) 154 (X.XX) (X) Apixaban 105 (0.76) 119 (0.86) 0.89 0.70-1.15 *%/yr are not reported 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Favors NOAC Favors warfarin *p value given in the NEJM; HR not reported; Not head to head comparison For illustrative purpose only adapted from references 1-4 1. Connolly et al. NEJM 2009; 361: 1139-51. 2. Connolly et al. NEJM 2010; 363: 1875-6. 3. Patel et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 883-91. 4. Granger et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 981-92.

Myocardial Infarction NOAC Warfarin No. of events (%/yr) HR 95% CI Dabi 110 Dabi 150 Riva (safety AT) 98 (0.82) 75 (0.64) 97 (0.81) 74 (0.64) 101 (0.91) 126 (1.12) 1.29 1.27 0.81 0.96-1.75 0.94-1.71 0.63-1.06 Apixaban 90 (0.53) 102 (0.61) 0.88 0.66-1.17 0.0 0.5 1.0 Favors NOAC ITT: Intention to Treat AT: as treated. Not head to head comparison For illustrative purpose only adapted from references 1-4 1. Connolly et al. NEJM 2009; 361: 1139-51. 2. Connolly et al. NEJM 2010; 363: 1875-6. 3. Patel et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 883-91. 4. Granger et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 981-92. 1.5 Favors warfarin 2.0

Death From Any Cause Total Mortality NOAC Warfarin No. of events (%/yr) p HR 95% CI Dabi 110 Dabi 150 Rivaroxaban Rivaroxaban (safety AT) Apixaban 446 (3.75) 487 (4.13) 0.13 0.91 0.80-1.03 438 (3.64) 487 (4.13) 0.051 0.88 0.77-1.00 582 (4.5) 632 (4.9) 0.15 0.92 0.82-1.03 208 (1.87) 250 (2.21) 603 (3.52) 669 (3.94) 0.07 0.049 0.85 0.70-1.02 0.89 0.80-0.99 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Favors NOAC Favors warfarin Not head to head comparison For illustrative purpose only adapted from references 1-4 1. Connolly et al. NEJM 2009; 361: 1139-51. 2. Connolly et al. NEJM 2010; 363: 1875-6. 3. Patel et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 883-91. 4. Granger et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 981-92.

NOACs Trials

August 2013: Major lung bleeding: hemoptysis Coumadin stopped Medication: Aspirin CHADS2=2= 4% risk, CHA2DS2 VASc=5=15.2% risk HAS-BLED=4=8.7% risk My recommendation: Start Apixaban 5mg bid Best efficacy / safety balance Clopidogrel APPRISE 2 Coumadin AF DCCV AF DCCV AF DCCV Amiodarone

Myocardial Infarction NOAC Warfarin No. of events (%/yr) HR 95% CI Dabi 110 Dabi 150 Riva (safety AT) 98 (0.82) 75 (0.64) 97 (0.81) 74 (0.64) 101 (0.91) 126 (1.12) 1.29 1.27 0.81 0.96-1.75 0.94-1.71 0.63-1.06 Apixaban 90 (0.53) 102 (0.61) 0.88 0.66-1.17 0.0 0.5 1.0 Favors NOAC ITT: Intention to Treat AT: as treated. Not head to head comparison For illustrative purpose only adapted from references 1-4 1. Connolly et al. NEJM 2009; 361: 1139-51. 2. Connolly et al. NEJM 2010; 363: 1875-6. 3. Patel et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 883-91. 4. Granger et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 981-92. 1.5 Favors warfarin 2.0 Dec 2011

August 2011: Major lung bleeding: hemoptysis Coumadin stopped Medication: Aspirin CHADS2=2= 4% risk, CHA2DS2 VASc=5=15.2% risk HAS-BLED=4=8.7% risk Clopidogrel Coumadin Pradaxa 150 mg bid AF DCCV AF DCCV AF DCCV Amiodarone

August 2012 December 2012 Amiodarone Lung toxicity Sotalol - Failure Persistent AF fast V rate Preparation for PVI (ablation) TEE LA thrombus X 2 DDDR pacemaker Total AV J Ablation Coumadin Pradaxa 150 mg bid AF DCCV AF DCCV AF DCCV Amiodarone

January 2013 Persistent AF fast V rate Preparation for PVI (ablation) TEE LA thrombus DDDR pacemaker Total AV J Ablation Hemoptysis Skin rash Dyspepsia Coumadin Amiodarone Pradaxa 150, 110 mg Xarelto bid 20 mg qd AF DCCV AF DCCV AF DCCV

April 2013 Persistent AF fast V rate Preparation for PVI (ablation) TEE LA thrombus DDDR pacemaker Total AV J Ablation Hemoptysis Coumadin AF DCCV AF DCCV AF DCCV Amiodarone Pradaxa Xarelto 20 mg- >15 mg

June 2013 No Hemoptysis Anterior wall MI PPCI to LAD Clopidogrel Coumadin AF DCCV AF DCCV AF DCCV Amiodarone Pradaxa Xarelto 15 mg

Hypothetical 2013: pre MI My recommendation: Start Apixaban 5mg bid Best efficacy / safety balance Clopidogrel Coumadin AF DCCV AF DCCV AF DCCV Amiodarone Pradaxa Xarelto

NOACs Trials

Myocardial Infarction NOAC Warfarin No. of events (%/yr) HR 95% CI Dabi 110 Dabi 150 Riva (safety AT) 98 (0.82) 75 (0.64) 97 (0.81) 74 (0.64) 101 (0.91) 126 (1.12) 1.29 1.27 0.81 0.96-1.75 0.94-1.71 0.63-1.06 Apixaban 90 (0.53) 102 (0.61) 0.88 0.66-1.17 0.0 0.5 1.0 Favors NOAC ITT: Intention to Treat AT: as treated. Not head to head comparison For illustrative purpose only adapted from references 1-4 1. Connolly et al. NEJM 2009; 361: 1139-51. 2. Connolly et al. NEJM 2010; 363: 1875-6. 3. Patel et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 883-91. 4. Granger et al. NEJM 2011; 365: 981-92. 1.5 Favors warfarin 2.0