SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Similar documents
Scientific Opinion on the efficacy of Suilectin (Phaseolus vulgaris lectins) as a zootechnical additive for suckling piglets (performance enhancer)

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium bisulphate (SBS) for all species as preservative and silage additive 1

Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (Benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety of Hostazym X as a feed additive for poultry and pigs 1

Scientific Opinion on the modification of the terms of authorisation of Protural (sodium benzoate) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Safety of the enzymatic preparation Natuphos (3-phytase) for sows 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium hydroxide for dogs, cats and ornamental fish 1

Safety of Allura Red AC in feed for cats and dogs

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

- N/A European Commission and/or Member States representatives: EFSA:

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Abstract

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS (6-phytase) as a feed additive for finfish. Abstract

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 October 2007

Scientific Opinion on the modification to the formulation of GalliPro and compatibility with formic acid 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus kefiri (DSM 19455) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1,2

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 3,4

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of diclazuril (Clinacox 0.5 %) as feed additive for chickens reared for laying 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Mn) as feed additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the Safety and Efficacy of thaumatin for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of L-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate as a flavouring additive for pets 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 3 February 2009

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 40027) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

(Agreed on 9 December 2014)

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Formi LHS (potassium diformate) as a feed additive for sows 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sorbic acid and potassium sorbate when used as technological additives for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Brilliant Blue FCF (E133) as a feed additive for cats and dogs 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for piglets 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30236) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of synthetic alpha-tocopherol for all animal species 1

The EFSA Journal (2004) 96, 1-5

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for dairy buffaloes 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Cu) as feed additive for all species 1

Statement on the preparation of guidance for the assessment of plant/herbal products and their constituents used as feed additives 1

Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc 47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for pigs for fattening 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of copper chelate of L-lysinate- HCl as feed additive for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 262, 1-6

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium) as a feed additive for dogs 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of erythrosine in feed for cats and dogs, ornamental fish and reptiles 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus brevis (DSMZ 21982) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2, 3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 22963) as a silage additive for all species 1

Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus diolivorans DSM as a silage additive for all animal species

The EFSA Journal (2005) 171, 1-5

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of anthranilate derivatives (chemical group 27) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Prostora Max (Bifidobacterium animalis) as a feed additive for dogs 1, 2

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2, 3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2, 3

Session 47.

GUIDANCE. Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives. Abstract

The EFSA Journal (2005) 287, 1-9

The EFSA Journal (2005) 289, 1-6

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (DSM 12836) as a silage additive for all species 1

The effect of extra biotin in the lactation diet of sows on litter weight gain

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of micro-organism DSM when used as a technological feed additive for pigs 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus (DSM 12834) as a silage additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of formic acid, ammonium formate and sodium formate as feed hygiene agents for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Avizyme 1505 (endo-1,4-β-xylanase, α-amylase, subtilisin) as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 207, 1-6

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of L-threonine produced by fermentation with Escherichia coli CGMCC for all animal species.

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of DL-methionyl-DL-methionine for all aquatic animal species 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 288, 1-7

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 10 July 2007

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening 1,2

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 19 September 2007

ADOPTED: 28 October 2015 PUBLISHED: 13 November 2015

The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6

EFSA NDA Panel (EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies), 2014.

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) 2,3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Transcription:

EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4157 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of VevoVitall (benzoic acid) as a feed additive for pigs for reproduction (gestating and lactating sows, boars and gilts) 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 ABSTRACT European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy VevoVitall consists of 99.9 % benzoic acid. It is already authorised in the European Union as a zootechnical additive for weaned piglets and pigs for fattening. VevoVitall is intended to be used in pigs for reproduction to reduce the ph of their urine. The applicant initially linked this effect to the reduction of the ammonia emission from the target animal s manure and the control of urinary tract disorders in sows, but subsequently removed these claims from the scope of the application. In 2012, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) adopted an opinion on the safety and efficacy of VevoVitall as a feed additive for pigs for reproduction, covering gestating and lactating sows, boars and gilts. The Panel could not conclude on the safety of the additive for the target species or on its efficacy because of the lack of data provided by the applicant. The FEEDAP Panel considered the new information provided by the applicant on safety and efficacy, concluding that VevoVitall is safe for sows, gilts and boars at the highest proposed use level (10 000 mg/kg complete feed), but no margin of safety could be established. VevoVitall at 5 000 mg/kg has the potential to introduce a small reduction in urine ph in sows. No conclusion on the effects on urine ph could be drawn for boars and gilts. The FEEDAP Panel considers that an effect on urinary ph alone is of little practical or biological relevance unless it is demonstrated to be linked to a clear beneficial effect on animal production, performance, welfare or the environmental consequences of animal production. European Food Safety Authority, 2015 KEY WORDS zootechnical additive, VevoVitall, benzoic acid, pigs for reproduction, safety, efficacy 1 On request from the European Commission, Question No EFSA-Q-2014-00551, adopted on 16 June 2015. 2 Panel members: Gabriele Aquilina, Vasileios Bampidis, Maria De Lourdes Bastos, Lucio Guido Costa, Gerhard Flachowsky, Mikolaj Antoni Gralak, Christer Hogstrand, Lubomir Leng, Secundino López-Puente, Giovanna Martelli, Baltasar Mayo, Fernando Ramos, Derek Renshaw, Guido Rychen, Maria Saarela, Kristen Sejrsen, Patrick Van Beelen, Robert John Wallace and Johannes Westendorf. Correspondence: FEEDAP@efsa.europa.eu 3 Acknowledgement: The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Other Zootechnical Additives, including Andrew Chesson, for the preparatory work on this scientific opinion. Suggested citation: EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), 2015. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of VevoVitall (benzoic acid) as a feed additive for pigs for reproduction (gestating and lactating sows, boars and gilts). EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4157, 7 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4157 Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal European Food Safety Authority, 2015

SUMMARY Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of VevoVitall (benzoic acid) as a feed additive for pigs for reproduction. VevoVitall consists of 99.9 % benzoic acid. The product is already authorised in the European Union as a zootechnical additive for piglets (weaned) and pigs for fattening. VevoVitall is intended to be used in pigs for reproduction to reduce the ph of their urine. The applicant initially linked this effect to the reduction of the ammonia emission from the target animal s manure and the control of urinary tract disorders in sows, but subsequently removed these claims from the scope of the application. In 2012, the FEEDAP Panel adopted an opinion on the safety and efficacy of VevoVitall as a feed additive for pigs for reproduction, covering gestating and lactating sows, boars and gilts. The FEEDAP Panel could not reach a conclusion regarding the safety of the additive for the target species or its efficacy as regards the reduction of the ammonia emission from the target animal s manure because of the lack of data provided by the applicant. The FEEDAP Panel considered the new information provided by the applicant with regard to the safety for the target species and the efficacy. VevoVitall is considered safe for sows at the highest proposed use level (10 000 mg/kg), but no margin of safety could be established. Although the FEEDAP Panel had reservations about the relevance of safety studies in pigs for fattening for boars and gilts, with the new tolerance study provided in sows, safety at the maximum use level of 10 000 mg/kg feed has now been established for weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows. Given that data is now available for weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows, the Panel considers that it is unlikely that this concentration would produce an adverse effect in boars and gilts. Therefore, the Panel concludes that VevoVitall is safe for gilts and boars at the highest proposed use level (10 000 mg/kg complete feed). VevoVitall at the dose of 5 000 mg/kg has the potential to introduce a small reduction in urine ph (approximately 0.4 units) in sows. In the absence of data, no conclusion on the effects on urine ph could be drawn for boars and gilts. The FEEDAP Panel considers that an effect on urinary ph alone is of little practical or biological relevance unless it is demonstrated to be linked to a clear beneficial effect on animal production, performance, welfare or on the environmental consequences of animal production. EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4157 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract... 1 Summary... 2 Background as provided by the European Commission... 4 Terms of reference as provided by the European Commission... 4 Assessment... 5 1. Introduction... 5 2. Conditions of use... 5 3. Safety for the target species... 5 3.1. Conclusions on the safety for species... 6 4. Efficacy... 6 Conclusions... 6 Documentation provided to EFSA... 7 References... 7 EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4157 3

BACKGROUND AS PROVIDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 4 establishes rules governing the Community authorisation of additives for animal nutrition and in particular, Article 9 defines the terms of the authorisation by the Commission. The applicant, DSM Nutritional Products, is seeking a Community authorisation of benzoic acid (VevoVitall ) for use in pigs for reproduction (gestating and lactating sows, boars and gilts), to be used as zootechnical additive (Table 1). Table 1: Description of the substance Category of additive Zootechnical additives Functional group of additive Other Trade name VevoVitall Description Benzoic acid Target animal category Pigs for reproduction (gestating and lactating sows, boars and gilts) Applicant DSM Nutritional Products Type of request Update opinion On 14th June 2012, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed of the European Food Safety Authority ( Authority ), in its opinion on the safety and efficacy of the product, could not conclude on the safety and efficacy of the product because of the lack of data provided by the applicant. The Commission gave the possibility to the applicant to submit complementary information in order to complete the assessment on the safety and the efficacy to allow a revision of Authority s opinion. The Commission has now received an additional dossier from the applicant on benzoic acid (VevoVitall ) for use in pigs for reproduction (gestating and lactating sows, boars and gilts), with supplementary information, concerning the safety and efficacy studies of the additive. The data generated by the applicant and compiled in the above-mentioned supplementary report have been sent directly to the Authority by the applicant. TERMS OF REFERENCE AS PROVIDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION In view of the above, the Commission asks the Authority to deliver an updated opinion on the safety and efficacy of benzoic acid (VevoVitall ) for use in pigs for reproduction (gestating and lactating sows, boars and gilts) as zootechnical additive based on the additional data submitted by the applicant. 4 Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition. OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29. EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4157 4

ASSESSMENT 1. Introduction VevoVitall consists of 99.9 % benzoic acid. The product is already authorised in the European Union as a zootechnical additive for piglets (weaned) and pigs for fattening. The Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) has previously delivered four opinions on the same product for weaned piglets (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2005, 2011), pigs for fattening (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2007) and pigs for reproduction (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012). VevoVitall is intended to be used in pigs for reproduction to reduce the ph of their urine. The applicant initially linked this effect to the reduction of the ammonia emission from the target animal s manure and the control of urinary tract disorders in sows, but subsequently removed these claims from the scope of the application. In the previous application on the use of VevoVitall in pigs for reproduction covering gestating and lactating sows, boars and gilts the FEEDAP Panel could not reach a conclusion regarding the safety of the additive for the target species or its efficacy as regards the reduction of the ammonia emission from the target animal s manure (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012). The applicant has now provided new information with regard to the safety for the target species and the efficacy, and this new information is the subject of this opinion. 5 2. Conditions of use VevoVitall is intended to be used in pigs for reproduction at a maximum level of 10 000 mg/kg feed. The applicant recommends a use level of 5 000 mg/kg feed. 3. Safety for the target species A tolerance study was performed to evaluate the tolerance of gestating and lactating sows to VevoVitall. 6 In total, 48 multiparous sows (Great Yorkshire Large White Dutch Landrace, 2nd to 6th parity) were used in this experiment. The experiment was conducted with sows in good health and with normal body condition at the beginning of the experiment. Sows were blocked based on parity, and individual feed intake was measured. Sows were transferred from the gestation unit to the farrowing rooms on approximately day 108 of gestation. Creep feed was supplied to the piglets from day 14 of lactation. No cross-fostering was applied. However, when the number of suckling piglets exceeded 14 viable piglets per litter, the surplus piglets were moved within three days after birth to a sow that was not used in the experiment. The experimental set-up was a completely randomised block design with four dietary treatments: supplementation of a basal diet with VevoVitall at 0, 5 000 mg/kg, 10 000 mg/kg (1 maximum recommended use level) or 20 000 mg/kg (2 ). There were 12 replicates (sows) per treatment. The doses were confirmed by analysis. Experimental diets were provided from insemination until weaning. Body weight and back fat thickness were measured at the start of the experiment, on day 108 of gestation, at farrowing and at weaning. Feed intake was calculated as the difference between feed allowance and feed refusals from the start of the experiment until weaning. The numbers of total born, live born and stillborn piglets were recorded. Piglets were individually weighed at birth and at weaning. Furthermore, litter weight was determined on days 7, 14 and 21 of lactation. At weaning, blood samples were taken for measurement of haematological and biochemical parameters. 7 After weaning, sows were slaughtered and the stomachs were collected to determine the effect of VevoVitall on the prevalence of gastric ulcers. In metacarpal bone, calcium and phosphorus content was measured. Data were statistically 5 Supplementary Information Dossier (July 2014). 6 Supplementary Information Dossier (July 2014)/Appendix A. 7 Red blood cells, packed cell volume, mean corpuscular volume, haemoglobin, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, white blood cells, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gammaglutamyltranspeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, calcium and phosphorus. EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4157 5

evaluated with an analysis of variance, and a Tukey post-test was used to compare treatment means. Individual animals were used as the experimental unit. Dietary treatments did not have an effect on the feed intake of the sow during gestation (average: 2.84 kg/day) or lactation (average: 5.97 kg/day). However, the mean body weight at weaning of sows receiving VevoVitall at a dose of 20 000 mg/kg (207.5 kg) was significantly lower (P = 0.002) than that of sows from the control or 5 000 mg/kg groups (223.4 and 223.3 kg, respectively). A similar effect was observed on back fat thickness at weaning. Sows from the 20 000 mg/kg group had a reduced back fat thickness compared with that of the sows from the control and 5 000 mg/kg groups (13.9, 15.5 and 15.9 mm for the 20 000, 0 and 5 000 mg/kg groups, respectively, P = 0001). No effect of dietary treatment was observed in the number of piglets born, litter performance, haematology and blood chemistry parameters, prevalence and severity of gastric ulcers, or bone composition. The use of 10 000 mg/kg VevoVitall did not affect any of the parameters evaluated. 3.1. Conclusions on the safety for the target species Based on a tolerance study in gestating and lactating sows, the FEEDAP Panel concludes that VevoVitall is safe for sows at the highest proposed use level (10 000 mg/kg complete feed). However, no margin of safety can be established. Although the FEEDAP Panel had reservations about the relevance of safety studies in pigs for fattening for boars and gilts, with the new tolerance study provided in sows, safety at the maximum use level of 10 000 mg/kg feed has now been established for weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows. Given that data is now available for weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows, the Panel considers that it is unlikely that this concentration would produce an adverse effect in boars and gilts. Therefore, the Panel concludes that VevoVitall is safe for gilts and boars at the highest proposed use level (10 000 mg/kg complete feed). 4. Efficacy In the previous opinion (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012), it was concluded that the concentration of 5 000 mg VevoVitall /kg caused a statistically significant reduction in urine ph in all four studies. However this reduction was small and unlikely to affect ammonia emission from manure. The addition of 10 000 mg/kg or above had a much greater impact on urinary ph in the two studies in which these levels were considered, but the consequences for ammonia emission could not be established. Consequently, the FEEDAP Panel is unable to conclude on the efficacy of VevoVitall in reducing ammonia emission from the manure of gestating and lactating sows. The FEEDAP Panel acknowledges that VevoVitall is able to reduce the ph of urine, as was concluded in the previous opinion. The concentration of 5 000 mg VevoVitall /kg caused a small but statistically significant reduction in the four studies (from 0.25 to 0.61 ph units). The reduction in ph was greater (from 0.73 to 1.31 ph units) at 10 000 mg/kg in the two studies where this dose was tested. However, the Panel considers that an effect on urinary ph alone is of little practical or biological relevance unless it can be linked to a clear beneficial effect on animal production, performance, welfare or the environmental consequences of animal production, as foreseen in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. Owing to the lack of data, and considering the different metabolism rate and physiological status as compared to pigs for fattening and lactating/gestating sows, no conclusion could be drawn as regards boars and gilts. CONCLUSIONS VevoVitall is considered safe for sows at the highest proposed use level (10 000 mg/kg), but no margin of safety could be established. Although the FEEDAP Panel had reservations about the relevance of safety studies in pigs for fattening for boars and gilts, with the new tolerance study EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4157 6

provided in sows safety at the maximum use level of 10 000 mg/kg feed has now been established for weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows. Given that data is now available for weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows, the Panel considers that it is unlikely that this concentration would produce an adverse effect in boars and gilts. Therefore, the Panel concludes that VevoVitall is safe for gilts and boars at the highest proposed use level (10 000 mg/kg complete feed). The FEEDAP Panel concludes that VevoVitall at the dose of 5 000 mg/kg has the potential to introduce a small reduction in urine ph in sows. In the absence of data, no conclusion on the effects on urine ph could be drawn for boars and gilts. The FEEDAP Panel considers that an effect on urinary ph alone is of little practical or biological relevance unless it is demonstrated to be linked to a clear beneficial effect on animal production, performance, welfare or on the environmental consequences of animal production. DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO EFSA 1. Supplementary Information Dossier to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of VevoVitall (benzoic acid) for pigs for reproduction. July 2014. Submitted by DSM Nutritional Products. 2. Supplementary Information Dossier to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of VevoVitall (benzoic acid) for pigs for reproduction. Supplementary information. April 2015. Submitted by DSM Nutritional Products. REFERENCES EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2005. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) on the safety and efficacy of the product VevoVitall as a feed additive for weaned piglets in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. The EFSA Journal 2005, 290, 1 13. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007. Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) on the safety and efficacy of VevoVitall (benzoic acid) as feed additive for pigs for fattening. The EFSA Journal 2007, 457, 1 14. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), 2011. Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets. EFSA Journal 2011;9(9):2358, 9 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2358 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), 2012. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of VevoVitall (benzoic acid) as feed additive for pigs for reproduction. EFSA Journal 2012;10(7):2775, 11 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2775 EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4157 7