Technology. Reinforced Earth Wall Typical Section. Traffic Barrier. Roadway. Select Granular Material. Facing Panel Random Backfill.

Similar documents
3/18/03 CE Keith P. Brabant, P.E.

ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: THE REPLACEMENT OF MD 362 OVER MONIE CREEK

APPENDIX A INTEGRAL ABUTMENTS

OVER US 6 LATERAL BRIDGE SLIDE: I-75

Appendix C Guidelines for Design of Integral Abutments March 3, 2003

Geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments

Appendix B. Shallow Foundations Report

DATA GATHERING AND DESIGN DETAILS OF AN INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGE

Modified Sheet Pile Abutment for Low-Volume Road Bridge

Shifting the Canning Bus Bridge Sideways

Three Bridges at I-64/Mercury Boulevard Interchange in Hampton, VA

Integral bridges and environmental conditions

Figure 3: Analytic procedure

Modular Steel Bridges. Stark County Fischer Bridge Bottineau County Oak Creek Bridge

A Tale of Two Bridges: Comparison between the Seismic Performance of Flexible and Rigid Abutments

Integral Abutment Bridge Design with Soil Structure Interaction

Lesner Bridge Replacement. April 24, 2017 Update. Construction Camera. Rendering of the Completed Lesner Bridge Structure

Semi-Integral Abutment Bridges

ACCELERATED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

Four simply supported steel plate girders (appear to be an old railcar).

Grade separated interchange at the intersection of U.S. Hwy 17 Bypass and Farrow Parkway

SEPTEMBER, 2006 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 7-0(1) CHAPTER 7 PAVEMENT DESIGN

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF BR1449 VICTORIA PARK DRIVE MODIFICATIONS, BURSWOOD, WA

Pennsylvania s Experience with LRFD Implementation. By: Thomas Macioce, P.E. Beverly Miller, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

Low-Volume Road Abutment Design Standards

Novel treatment technique

Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Integrated Bridge Systems (IBS) John Bowders University of Missouri

Effect of Pile Orientation in Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges

Monitored Displacements of a Unique Geosynthetic-Reinforced Walls Supporting Bridge and Approaching Roadway Structures

research report Field Measurements on Skewed Semi-Integral Bridge With Elastic Inclusion: Instrumentation Report

2011 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

Fort Goff Creek Bridge R04 ABC Project. Dorie Mellon, PE Structure Policy & Innovation Division of Engineering Services Caltrans May 20, 2015

Numerical analysis of the embedded abutments of integral bridges

Development of Abutment Design Standards for Local Bridge Designs Volume 1 of 3

Design of Dingley Bypass Integral Bridges

Modified Sheet Pile Abutments for Low-Volume Road Bridges

ABC OF BRIDGE NO. 465 I-195 Ramp (Dr-2) Over Warren Avenue

IL 115 OVER GAR CREEK ACCELERATED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT. Chad Hodel, S.E., P.E. (WHKS) Stan Kaderbek, S.E., P.E. (Milhouse)

PENNDOT e-notification

Integral Abutment Bridges-Development of Soil Model for Soil Structure Interaction in Time History Analysis

Emergency Bridge Stabilization at Mile Watrous Subdivision

The Structure upon which the ends of a Bridge rests is referred to as an Abutment

Critically damaged bridges & concepts for earthquake recovery

DESIGN ASSESSMENT OF THE FOUNDERS/MEADOWS GRS ABUTMENT STRUCTURE

B. Stipulated Price (Lump Sum). If Contract is Stipulated Price Contract, payment for Work in this Section is included in total Stipulated Price.

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CRANE LAKE ROAD OVER HAWKINSON CREEK ST. LOUIS COUNTY

STATE ROUTE 30 OVER BESSEMER AVE. SUPERSTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT IN 57 HOURS

Ashton Avenue Integral Bridge

Update on Seismic Behavior and Design of

Ahmed Mongi, M.S., P.E. Engineering Division

Webinar Q&A Documentation Slide In Bridge Construction (SIBC) Construction/Contractor Perspective March 6, 2014

Conditional assessment of Kiri Bridge in Shkoder, Albania

ASD and LRFD of Reinforced SRW with the use of software Program MSEW(3.0)

SUMMARY OF NOVEMBER 2018 REVISIONS - VERSION

Rebuilding and widening the 54- year-old Jane Addams Memorial Tollway into a state-of-the-art corridor linking Rockford to Elgin (three lanes) and

BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF AN INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGE

Earthquake Resistance of Bridges With Friction Slab Abutments

Executive Summary RPT-GEN November 28. Bridge No Quartz Creek Bridge Inspection Report

Integral Bridge Design - Derivation of the Spring Constant for Modelling the Soil-Structure Interaction

Introduction. Substructure Inspection and Rating. Introduction. Introduction 28/03/2017

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 24 OVER HAWKINSON CREEK ST. LOUIS COUNTY

Aerial of Conceptual Path and Bridge Tysons-Old Meadow Road Bike/Ped Improvements

SUMMARY OF NOVEMBER 2013 REVISIONS - VERSION

CHAPTER 5 MODELING OF THE BRIDGE

Comparative Study of Behaviour of Integral and Bearing Type Bridge under Temperature Loading

Thermal Response of Integral Abutment Bridges With Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls

THERMAL RESPO SE OF I TEGRAL ABUTME T BRIDGES WITH MSE WALLS: UMERICAL A ALYSES A D A PRACTICAL A ALYSIS TOOL

5 DAMAGE TO TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES

Experimental and Analytical Investigation of UHPC Pile-to-Abutment Connections

Analyses of State Highway Bridges Damaged in the Darfield and Christchurch Earthquakes

Permanent deformation of bridge abutment on liquefiable soils

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 4 OVER THE CLEARWATER RIVER (DAM) DISTRICT 2 - CLEARWATER COUNTY

EFFECTS OF SPATIAL VARIATION OF SEISMIC INPUTS ON BRIDGE LONGITUDINAL RESPONSE

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 6 OVER A BRANCH OF THE CALDWELL CREEK DISTRICT 1 - KOOCHICHING COUNTY

Development of Preflex Composite Beam-Stub Abutment Integral Bridge System

Precast Concrete Elements for Accelerated Bridge Construction

Detailed Seismic Assessment and Seismic Improvements of Market Road Underpass

Integral Abutment Bridges Australian and US Practice

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO th STREET OVER THE ZUMBRO RIVER CITY OF ROCHESTER

Keywords: integral abutment bridge, pile head abutment connection, finite element method.

EXAMINATION OF THE RESPONSE OF SKEWED STEEL BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE DURING DECK PLACEMENT

Bahavior and Analysis of an Integral Abutment Bridge

AK FIXATOR SYSTEM AK1

Wick Drains and Piling for Cai Mep Container Port, Vietnam. Bengt H. Fellenius. Sower's Lecture Atlanta May 8, 2012

COMBINED APPLICATION OF ULTRASONIC INSPECTION AND ACOUSTIC EMISSION MONITORING FOR EVALUATION OF FRACTURE CRITICAL MEMBERS IN RAILWAY BRIDGES.

R-Group Finland Oy. RLS Lifting Sockets Technical Manual According to Eurocodes, EU Machinery directive 2006/42/EC and VDI/BV-BS 6205 CE Approved

Numerical Modeling of the Performance of Highway Bridge Approach Slabs. Gregory S. Rajek

L. Greenfield Christchurch City Council M. Cowan Opus International Consultants W. du Plessis HEB Construction 26 March 2015

THERMAL BEHAVIOR OF IDOT INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGES AND PROPOSED DESIGN MODIFICATIONS

The UCD community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters!

Bengt H. Fellenius. Wick Drains and Piling for Cai Mep Container Port, Vietnam, and the true cost of 5 cent per foot. Amsterdam.

Prediction of Concrete Integral Abutment Bridge Unrecoverable Displacements

State-Aid Bridge News August 2, 2005

Experimental Evaluation of Seismic Pounding at Seat- Type Abutments of Horizontally Curved Bridges

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE FEASIBILITY STUDY OF GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SOIL INTEGRATED BRIDGE SYSTEMS (GRS-IBS) IN OKLAHOMA A THESIS

Monitoring of a bridge with integral abutments

Integral Bridge Design. Integral Bridge Design. in Midas Civil. Midas UK

INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGE- A Review and Comparison of the Integral Bridge and Conventional Bridge

Field and Analytical Studies of the First Folded Plate Girder Bridge

Transcription:

Bridge Applications

Technology The Reinforced Earth Company (RECo) offers a variety of bridge abutment and bridge crossing solutions, each are based on project specific requirements. Bridge abutments are considered critical structures and the unique strength and load distribution capabilities of Reinforced Earth address that criticality in an economical and structurally efficient way. For many bridges, a spread footing bridge seat can be supported directly on the reinforced soil, thus eliminating the need for piles. When piles are necessary, they are easily fitted between the reinforcing strips or the strips can be pivoted to clear the piles, resulting in a simple retaining wall surrounding the abutment structure. In both configurations, the shallow foundation depth typical of Reinforced Earth structures and the limited use of cast-in-place concrete lead to significant time and cost savings. TechSpan precast arches provide the ideal solution for short to medium span bridges with precast concrete segments that offer rapid installation. By combining the TechSpan precast arch system with Reinforced Earth retaining walls, you can enjoy the aesthetics of a truly archshaped opening with headwalls and wing walls that provide a natural and pleasing look. Both systems provide a structure with a long service life and superior seismic qualities and low maintenance requirements. Traffic Barrier Shiplap Panel Joint Tie Strip Embed Detail Reinforcing Strips Reinforced Earth retaining structures are an economical way to meet ordinary and extraordinary earth retention and load support needs for highways and bridges, railroads and mass transit systems, waterfronts, airports, loading docks, industrial and mining facilities and commercial and residential developments. Each wall is a coherent gravity structure, custom-engineered by RECo to project-specific requirements including applied loading, foundation conditions, and aesthetics. Roadway Select Granular Material Facing Panel Random Backfill Detail Reinforcing Strips Leveling Pad Reinforced Earth Wall Typical Section

Design Select Backfill Service Life MSE retaining walls, including those at pile supported abutments, are routinely designed for a 75-year service life, while structures supporting bridges are designed for a 100-year service life. Temporary structures can be designed anywhere from a few months to many years. Typically* the select granular backfill material used in the mechanically stabilized earth structure shall be reasonably free from organic and otherwise deleterious materials, have a minimum shear strength of 34 and shall conform to the following gradation limits as determined by AASHTO T-27: Sieve Size Percent Passing 4 inches 100 3 inches 75-100 No. 200 0-15 In addition, the backfill shall conform to project specific requirements for Plasticity Index, Soundness, and Electrochemical testing. *Typical shear strength and gradation limits are noted, values outside of these limits are possible and will be evaluated and on a case by case basis. Span Ranges Application Rapid Construction Eliminates Bump in Bridge 80 feet 80-200 feet 200-300 feet 300+ feet REspan True Abutment Mixed (Pile) Abutment Techspan Bridge

Options Temporary Abutment TerraTrel wire-faced MSE walls provide a cost-effective solution for applications where aesthetics are not a critical requirement. TerraTrel may be used for permanent and temporary applications such as service roads, low volume state roads, and phased construction of bridges in lieu of other methods of shoring such as sheeting or pile and lagging walls; this allows traffic to flow on the lanes of an existing bridge while the new MSE abutments and bridge are constructed. If significant settlements or preload conditions are anticipated for a structure, a two-staged MSE wall can be utilized combining TerraTrel and a precast or cast-in-place facing. Two-Stage Application Completed Acute Corner Phased Construction Acute Corner under Construction The design of the earth reinforcement system for acute corners less than 60 degrees is unique. The nose portion of the structure is designed as an internally tied bin structure with at-rest earth pressures from top to bottom. The reinforcing strips are designed as tension members only and are generally at low stress due to the bin effect (soil arching) and the conservative number of strips used. The connections to the panels are all double shear structural connections. The tied bin section is separated from the adjacent normally reinforced portion of the structure by slip joints. In addition, reinforcing strips are extended back from the nose portion of the structure to tie this relatively light section back into the major portion of the mass. The performance of this system has been remarkable due to its high strength and flexibility. In addition, the individual reinforcing strips and numerous connection locations on the backs of the panels make the system very versatile and constructible in the presence of obstructions such as piles. 1-800-446-5700

REspan Economic Solution for Short to Medium Span Bridges Design in accordance with AASHTO specifications Reduced construction cost and time Construction in all weather conditions Fully engineered making field changes unnecessary Inextensible steel reinforcements No time dependent movements Precast concrete facing panels More durable than concrete masonry units

True Abutments Abutment construction falls on the critical path of any bridge project. So scheduling certainty at this stage is crucial to timely project completion. With a rapid and predictable construction procedure, Reinforced Earth true abutments certainly meet this requirement. A faster installation of Reinforced Earth true abutments translates directly into less labor and lower costs. In a true Reinforced Earth abutment, the bridge beams are supported on a spread footing bearing directly on the MSE structure. The bearing stresses beneath the beam seat are distributed into the reinforced soil, so soil reinforcement density is higher near the top of the structure and may decrease with depth as the bearing stresses dissipate. A primary technical advantage of Reinforced Earth structures is their ability to support extremely large loads and distribute them evenly to the subgrade soils.

Economy True Reinforced Earth abutments are a superior and often more economical solution in cases where poor foundation soils might otherwise dictate use of deep piles or other remedial foundation treatments. Because of its flexibility, a Reinforced Earth abutment can withstand considerable settlements arising from consolidation of the foundation soils. And even when extraordinary corrective measures must be taken before construction of the abutments, Reinforced Earth can still allow the realization of significant cost savings. An additional benefit typical of all true MSE abutments is the approach embankment leading up to an MSE abutment is continuous with the compacted granular fill on which the bridge seat rests. Therefore, if the embankment settles due to movement within the foundation soils, the bridge seat moves with it rather than being rigidly fixed in position by piles. The "bump at the end of the bridge" is eliminated, with resulting reduced maintenance cost. In a typical design of a true abutment, the beam seat is sized so the centerline of bearing is at least 3 feet behind the MSE wall face and the bearing pressure on the reinforced soil is approximately 4 kips per square foot. However, variations from the typical noted above are possible since each MSE true abutment is designed to project specific requirements including, but not limited to, beam seat dimensions, bearing pressure and distance from the wall face.

Mixed Abutments A mixed abutment has piles supporting the bridge seat with the MSE walls retaining the fill beneath and adjacent to the end of the bridge. Both true and mixed Reinforced Earth abutments are used for bridges with integral abutments as well as for conventional bridges. Integral bridge abutments, have neither joints nor bearings, thus reducing cost and maintenance. Integral bridges are generally supported on piles, so pile deflection caused by thermal movements of the superstructure must be accommodated by the reinforced soil of the MSE structure. In some cases a portion of the lateral load on the pile-supported seat is transmitted to the MSE fill. This load can be resisted by MSE reinforcements in the wall or by reinforcements extending from the backwall of the seat.

Piles When significant negative skin friction is anticipated, a casing around each pile may be provided, extending through the reinforced fill. REINFORCING STRIP SKEW AT ABUTMENT PILES In order to provide adequate clearance for placement of soil reinforcements and small compaction equipment, a minimum 18-inch clear distance is recommended between the back face of MSE panels and the nearest edge of pile/shaft or pile sleeve. Strip-type MSE reinforcements with bolted connections may simply be skewed around piles, while systems utilizing welded wire mats or continuous geosynthetic reinforcements require special details to transfer the reinforcements and their load around the piles. These design details are applicable to both traditional non-integral and integral pile supported MSE abutments.

Precast Arch Bridges TechSpan is a three-pin, two-piece, funicular curve shaped arch. The Reinforced Earth Company offers custom-designed precast concrete arches that deliver maximum economy and the flexibility of site-specific clearance envelopes. Each TechSpan arch is carefully tailored and optimized, structurally and geometrically, to meet the individual needs of the project. The system can be designed to accommodate high fills, heavy live loads, and altering loading conditions. TechSpan arches can be installed over existing roads, live rail or other service, with minimal disruption. The design methodology utilizes finite element analysis and funicular curve theory, resulting in minimum use of materials, maximum arch durability, and a cost effective total solution that is simple and efficient to install.

Advantages Precast concrete elements shipped to site Uninterrupted traffic flow Construct with a three man crew and one crane (two cranes required first half day) Rapid, simple and predictable installation No falsework or scaffolding No post tensioning necessary Durability of precast concrete gives long service life with low maintenance No maintenance of bearings or joints High quality control standards Shape minimizes bending moments Designed to clearance box dimensions

800.446.5700 www.reinforcedearth.com 2018 The Reinforced Earth Company. Reinforced Earth, TechSpan, the Reinforced Earth logo and the Cruciform panel shape are registered trademarks of The Reinforced Earth Company. SCAN to see our locations across the United States