North Carolina Department of Public Health Tobacco Initiatives. Tobacco-Free Colleges Initiative Phase III

Similar documents
North Carolina Tobacco-Free Colleges Initiative

Semi-Annual Report, Fiscal Year July-December 2010

BUILDING TEAMS: A TOBACCO EVALUATION AND MONITORING SYSTEM

North Carolina Health and Wellness Trust Fund. Tobacco-Free Colleges Initiative. Q1 Y3 Quarterly Report January March 2008

Teen Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation Initiative

Tobacco Prevention and Evaluation Programs University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine

North Carolina Health and Wellness Trust Fund. Teen Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation Initiative. Independent Outcomes Evaluation

North Carolina Health & Wellness Trust Fund. Tobacco Free Colleges Initiative Phase II. Third Quarter, Fiscal Year January March 2010

Second Quarter, Fiscal Year October December 2008

North Carolina Health and Wellness Trust Fund. Teen Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation Initiative. Independent Outcomes Evaluation

Improving Evaluation Data Quality by Addressing Nuances in Commonly-Used Tobacco Prevention and Cessation Indicators

North Carolina Health and Wellness Trust Fund Teen Tobacco Use Prevention & Cessation Initiative Outcomes Evaluation

Tobacco Prevention Evaluation Program UNC-CH Dept. of Family Medicine

SPARK Mini-Grant Guidelines for 2018/2019 Academic School Year

Minnesota Postsecondary Institutions Tobacco-use Policies and Changes in Student Tobacco-use Rates ( )

QuitlineNC Evaluation July 2008 June 2009

TUPAC Five-Year Action Plan

Impact of UNC Health Care s Tobacco-Free Hospital Campus Policy on Hospital Employees

Community College Students

Oregon Statewide Tobacco Control Plan. Taking Action for a Tobacco Free Oregon. Year 4/5 Operations Plan

Quitline NC Evaluation November June 2007

CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INVESTIGATIONS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Tobacco Prevention. Go tobacco-free: A guide for helping your employees limit tobacco use

State Tobacco Control Programs

The facts are in: Minnesota's 2013 tobacco tax increase is improving health

Implementing a Successful Tobacco-free Policy at the Worksite

Creating a Smoke-Free Campus: Lessons Learned at UB. NY State College Health Association 2010 Annual Meeting Workshop on October 21, :15am

of HAWAI'I UNIVERSITY MEMORANDUM NUMBER TO: M.R.C. Greenwood President University of Hawaii VIA:

California Department of Education. Coordinated School Health and Safety Office. Report to the Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee

DP Program 2 National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program. Objective Reviewer s Tool March 2017

Colleges For Change Mobilizing the College Community to Take Action Against Big Tobacco

North Carolina Leadership

DUDE DO YOU EVEN VAPE? DOES YOUR AREA HAVE A PROBLEM WITH YOUTH VAPING? WHAT S SO APPEALING ABOUT VAPING? WHAT CAN YOU DO TO HELP DECREASE YOUTH USE?

Sally Carter, MSW, LCSW Director of Statewide Initiatives Tobacco Use Prevention Service Oklahoma State Department of Health

2010 Mecklenburg County Health Department Community Report Appointments: General Information:

The following report provides details about the strategic plan and the main accomplishments from the 2015 plan.

Impact of Kentucky Governor Beshear s Tobacco-Free Executive Order

North Carolina Health and Wellness Trust Fund. Quitline NC. Quitline NC Evaluation July 2007 June Prepared for:

About the Division of Public Health The Role of the Division of Public Health in Influencing Health

Maryland Smoke-Free Living Initiatives Maryland Health Housing Symposium June 1, 2016

TOBACCO CONTROL RESOURCE PROGRAM

SRSLY Strategic Plan I. Introduction Community Needs Assessment & Strategic Planning

NorthPoint Health and Wellness

Health and Wellness Trust Fund Teen Tobacco Prevention Initiative Outcomes Evaluation

Randolph County. State of the County Health Report 2014

Innovative Approaches and Proven Strategies for Maximizing Reach: Case Studies to Highlight Promising and Best Practices

IC Chapter 4. Indiana Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation Trust Fund

Youth as Agents of Change

Executive Director s. Update

2009 Evaluation of the North Carolina TRU Media Campaign

Final Report. Supported Decision-Making: North Carolina.

SMOKE - FREE ONTARIO. The Next Chapter For a Healthier Ontario

History of Tobacco Prevention and Control in Texas

Open Letter to Financial Secretary, Hong Kong SAR Government

Cancer Control and Screening. Tobacco Use Prevention. Public Health Emergency Preparedness. Safe Kids Safe Communities

New Jersey s Comprehensive Tobacco Control Program: Importance of Sustained Funding

TOBACCO FREE POLICY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

GATS Highlights. GATS Objectives. GATS Methodology

University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Center for Prevention Annual Report

NRT in Combination with Quitline Counseling: What Delivery and Protocol Design Methods are Working Best?

Organization: NAMI Minnesota Request ID: Program Title: Reducing Smoking Among People with Mental Illnesses

C Y. A Toolkit for Colleges and Universities

Institute for Health Promotion Research San Antonio Tobacco Prevention and Control Coalition Community-Based Needs Assessment-2008 Executive Summary

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1 P age

Engaging the Local Community and Raising Awareness about Tobacco-Related Disparities

30 People 30 Days Smoke Free Initiative Ohlone Community College

Leading Together. Public Health & Mental Health Partners Collaborating to Address Health Disparities

5 Public Health Challenges

Policy Considerations for a Healthier Campus

Guide to Tobacco-Free Campuses

County Department of Social Services. Wilson. Submitted By. Candice Rountree. Program Manager. Address. 100 NE Gold St Wilson, NC United States

Herding cats with designated tobacco & vapor areas

Tobacco Use among Year Old Students in the Philippines, Authors. Nathan R. Jones CDC Office on Smoking and Health

Proposal to address Teenage Smoking Social Environment

Plan for a Healthier Allegheny. June 30, 2016

North Carolina Prevention Report Card 2005

Sample Evaluation Plan. Indicator 3.2.7

Florida Asthma Coalition 2013 Operational Plan Page 1 of 11

Help for Pregnant Women to Quit Smoking and Stay Quit

Towson University Center for Adults with Autism Towson, MD Adventure Pursuits for Adults with Autism

4.b.i Promote tobacco use cessation, especially among low SES populations and those with poor mental health (Focus Area 2; Goal #2.

University of Toronto Governing Council. Smoke-Free Policy

An Overview of HUD s Smoke-Free Multifamily Housing Initiative

North TRU Prelimi. ion and. June

FY14-FY17 Tobacco Prevention and Control Community Grant Program Workbook

The Global Network Aiming to deliver safe quality care in relation to tobacco for every service user, every time and everywhere

Promoting Meaningful Family Involvement in Coordinated Specialty Care Programming for Persons with First Episode of Psychosis

Anthem Colorado and the Colorado QuitLine

Survey of Nevada Voters Examines Views Toward Smoke-Free Law and SB 372

Impact of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network April 2018

Local Laws to Raise the Minimum Legal Sale Age for all Tobacco Products 21 Years of Age in the North Country Frequently Asked Questions

U.S. Fund for UNICEF Campus Initiative LEADERSHIP TRANSITION HANDBOOK

TOBACCO CONTROL IN SOUTHERN NEVADA

Operations Council Committee Report

Technical Assistance for Local Health Departments to Support, Leverage and Expand Use of CDC s Tips from Former Smokers Campaign

GATS Philippines Global Adult Tobacco Survey: Executive Summary 2015

CONTROL, REGULATION, AND TAXATION OF MARIJUANA AND INDUSTRIAL HEMP ACT PRESENTATION TO LEGISLATIVE TASK FORCE ON OLCC 11/19/14

NCADD-SFV Vesper Ave Van Nuys Ca Phone: (818) Fax: (818) ;

TRAINING CURRICULUM. Fall 2012

Transcription:

Cover page North Carolina Department of Public Health Tobacco Initiatives Tobacco-Free Colleges Initiative Phase III Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2010-2011 July 2010 June 2011 Prepared For: Department of Health and Human Services Tobacco Prevention and Control Branch Prepared by: UNC School of Medicine Tobacco Prevention and Evaluation Program Page 1 NC Tobacco-Free Colleges Phase III Fiscal Year 2010-2011

For more information about the Tobacco-Free Colleges Initiative Outcomes Evaluation, please contact: Tobacco Prevention and Evaluation Program Department of Family Medicine UNC School of Medicine CB #7595, 590 Manning Drive Chapel Hill, NC 27599 T: 919-843-8354 F: 919-966-9435 Web: http://www.tpep.unc.edu Email: tpep@med.unc.edu Page 2 NC Tobacco-Free Colleges Phase III Fiscal Year 2010-2011

Summary North Carolina Tobacco-Free Colleges Initiative Phase III, FY2010-2011 The first year of Phase III of the North Carolina Tobacco-Free College Initiative was highly successful in meeting its objectives. North Carolina now has 45 smoke- or tobacco-free campuses that protect over 228,000 students each semester (representing 41% of the college and community college student population). Participation in the Tobacco-Free College Initiative remains strongly linked to policy adoption. More campus smoke- or tobacco-free policies were under formal consideration or were adopted in 2010-2010 than in the previous year for participating campuses. A total of four participating campuses, three community colleges and one NC independent university, adopted 100% tobacco-free policies during the fiscal year. A noticeable trend across all evaluation process measures was a building of momentum with increasing activity across the first three quarters of the year, followed by a decline in activity in the fourth quarter. This decline was likely due to uncertainty regarding continued funding as a result of the legislative proposal to abolish the Health and Wellness Trust Fund (HWTF). Despite being faced with the potential demise of the initiative, grantees described significant accomplishments in the initiative and a desire to continue pushing forward. NC Tobacco-Free Colleges remains one of the most successful and long standing initiatives of its kind. Overall Findings Forty-five of North Carolina s (NC s) 110 colleges and universities are now smoke- or tobacco-free indoors and outdoors. These policies protect over 228,000 students each semester, or nearly 41% of the total student population, including 53% of community colleges, 28% of independent colleges and universities, and 25% of universities of the University of North Carolina system. In response to a 2010 recommendation, communication among grantees increased significantly in 2011. As communication amongst grantees increased, sole reliance on the HWTF Coordinator decreased. Technical support services provided by grantees to campuses dropped in the fourth quarter, especially those provided to four year schools. Decreases in grantee activity in the fourth quarter were evident in many evaluation process measures. Recommendations Organize a statewide meeting of leadership from all campuses in the University of North Carolina system to address barriers and diffuse and disseminate information regarding the adoption of smokeand tobacco-free policies within these institutions. Enlist the leadership of community college campuses that have already adopted 100% tobacco-free policies to make personal contact (i.e., phone calls, e-mails) with leadership in peer institutions that have not yet adopted policies. The remaining community colleges are more likely to respond to pressures emanating from peers than outside pressures. Get on an early 2012 agenda of a meeting of the UNC Board of Governors to inform them of the issue and make them aware that they lag behind the community college system in the adoption of smokeand tobacco-free campus policies. Page 1 NC Tobacco-Free Colleges Phase III Fiscal Year 2010-2011

Develop a sustainability plan that will allow the momentum of grantee activities to be maintained until the mission is complete. Realign technical assistance to reflect any changing grantee needs. Policy Change Purpose: Policy change is a primary outcome of the Initiative, as they protect students/faculty/staff from secondhand smoke, reduce exposure to tobacco industry promotions, and help smokers quit. Grantees rate their type of involvement as being personally involved in the policy change (direct) or working with the campus but without hands-on involvement in the actual policy adoption (indirect). Grantees then rate their level of involvement with the campus in general on a three point scale: minimal, moderate, or maximum. During the 2010 2011 fiscal year a total of four campuses, three community colleges and one NC independent university, adopted 100% tobacco-free policies (Table 2). Now 31 out of 58 (53%) of NC s community colleges, 10 out of 36 (28%) of NC s independent colleges and universities, and 4 out of 16 (25%) of universities in the University of North Carolina system have adopted the most protective policies allowed by law (Table 2). Table 1: Smoke- and tobacco-free policy adoptions by date, 2010 2011 Campus Passed Type of Campus HWTF Grantee Involved Type of Policy Rockingham CC Sept 2010 CC Guilford County Department of Public Health TF Edgecombe CC Feb 2011 CC East Carolina University and N.E. NC Partnership for Public Health Gaston College May 2011 CC Mecklenburg County Health Department TF Pfeiffer University Jun 2011 NCICU Mecklenburg County Health Department and Tobacco Prevention & Control Branch Note: CC = Community College; NCICU= NC Independent Colleges and Universities; TF = 100% Tobacco Free Table 2: Percentage of campuses tobacco-free Type of Campus N Tobacco-Free Percent TF Community College 58 31 53% NC Independent Colleges and Universities 36 10 28% UNC System 16 4 25% Total 110 45 41% TF TF Page 2 NC Tobacco-Free Colleges Phase III Fiscal Year 2010-2011

After leveling off for the first half of the fiscal year, the diffusion of the most protective policies allowed by law appears to be once again on the rise (Figure 1). The North Carolina Tobacco-Free College Initiative continues to play a prominent role in ensuring the continued diffusion of policies, as adoption of tobacco-free policies among non-funded campuses flat lined over one year ago (Figure 2). Figure 1: Diffusion of policies among NC colleges and universities over time Figure 2: Diffusion of policies among NC colleges and universities: Role of NC TFC Initiative Page 3 NC Tobacco-Free Colleges Phase III Fiscal Year 2010-2011

In comparison to fiscal year 2009 2010, an increase in the total number of smoke- and tobacco-free campus policies occurred among participating campuses. FY 2010-2011 showed larger numbers of policies under formal consideration and more policies adopted. Table 3: Policies under consideration and adopted (2009 2010 vs. 2010 2011) Outcome indicator measure Year 1 Number of policies: Under formal consideration Adopted in campus areas (includes 100% tobacco-free) Adopted by campus organizations Adopted prohibiting sales Adopted prohibiting advertising/marketing 2 3 4 Total 09 10 2 1 0 1 4 10 11 0 3 2 1 6 09 10 2 0 2 1 5 10 11 4 2 1 3 10 09 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 11 0 0 0 0 0 09 10 1 0 0 0 1 10 11 0 0 0 1 1 09 10 2 0 0 0 2 10 11 0 0 0 0 0 Communication and Technical Assistance for Problem Solving between Grantees Purpose: The program relies on internal communication between grantees, the Tobacco-Free Colleges Coordinator (TFC), and technical assistance providers to identify and solve barriers to policy adoption, improve skills, and share information. A recommendation for Phase III implementation made in the Phase II Fiscal Year 2009-2010, Four and Annual Report was to, Increase the frequency of cross collaboration (grantee to grantee communication) to share information, build momentum, and celebrate successes. This recommendation was realized during the first year of Phase III (Figure 3). As communication amongst grantees increased, reliance on the HWTF Coordinator decreased (Figure 3). Technical assistance provider utilization was low in every quarter except for the third (Table 4). TPCB-Cessation and NC STEP were in the most demand, but again predominantly in the third quarter. Figure three is presented on the following page Page 4 NC Tobacco-Free Colleges Phase III Fiscal Year 2010-2011

Figure 3: Communications reported by grantees with other grantees and HWTF Coordinator (TFC), 2010 2011 Table 4: Communications reported by grantees to technical assistance providers, 2010 2011 Evaluation process measure Number of communications reported by grantees to: 1 2 3 4 RTI 1 1 1 0 3 NC STEP 1 4 14 1 20 SAVE 0 0 0 0 0 TPCB-Cessation 2 6 14 6 28 TPCB-Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 TPCB-Media 4 0 0 0 4 WFU 0 0 2 0 2 NAATPN 0 0 0 3 3 Services and Assistance Provided to Campuses Purpose: Regional grantees provide assistance to campuses on policy adoption, policy compliance, and QuitlineNC promotion. These services are reported by campus type (four year, two year, and forprofit/religious/trade). Visits to all campus types remained stable through the fiscal year (Figure 4). The quantity of technical support sessions provided to four year and community colleges by grantees dropped during the fourth quarter (Figure 5). Emphasis remained on four year colleges and community colleges. A substantial increase in technical support and campus visits occurred with for-profit/religious/trade schools (vocational). Total Figure four and five is presented on the following page Page 5 NC Tobacco-Free Colleges Phase III Fiscal Year 2010-2011

Figure 4: Campus visits reported by grantees by quarter, 2010 2011 Figure 5: Technical support sessions provided by grantees to campuses by quarter, 2010 2011 Grantees also provided skill building trainings and meetings to their regional coalition campuses. The number of activities peaked in the second and third quarters. Table 5: Regional coalition activities, 2010 2011 Evaluation process measure 1 2 3 4 Total Grantee organized in-person skill building trainings for regional campus staff and partners Grantee organized conference calls or in-person coalition meetings for regional campus staff and partners 2 3 5 3 13 0 4 6 3 13 Page 6 NC Tobacco-Free Colleges Phase III Fiscal Year 2010-2011

Grantees also track the number of presentations they make to student clubs and organizations promoting policy adoption, compliance, or QuitlineNC. These presentations are only tracked for four year schools and community colleges. Presentations made to students at community colleges remained steady for the first three quarters of the fiscal year, but dropped again in the fourth quarter (Figure 6). Presentations at four year schools saw a dramatic drop in the fourth quarter. Figure 6: Presentations made by grantees to student clubs, 2010 2011 Media Purpose: To advance the goals of the Initiative, grantees and campuses use media to promote policy adoption, policy compliance, and QuitlineNC. Media is a key component of each goal and shares successes of policy adoption with other interested campuses in addition to providing essential information to students, faculty, and staff. The same trend continued for the media evaluation process measure as was present with other measures with momentum in grantee activity building across the second and third quarters and declining in the fourth quarter. Table 6: Media messages developed, 2010 2011 Evaluation process measure 1 2 3 4 Number of media messages developed 2 10 15 3 30 Number of messages covering: Policy adoption 1 2 3 0 6 Policy compliance 1 4 3 1 9 QuitlineNC and cessation services 2 9 13 3 27 Number tailored to a priority population 0 0 0 0 0 Priority population tailor for - - - - - Total Page 7 NC Tobacco-Free Colleges Phase III Fiscal Year 2010-2011

Table 7: Earned media messages disseminated, 2010 2011 Evaluation process measure 1 2 3 4 Number of earned media messages disseminated 6 7 9 5 27 Number of messages covering: Policy adoption 6 1 0 0 7 Policy compliance 0 3 4 2 9 QuitlineNC and cessation services 0 5 7 5 17 Number tailored to a priority population 0 1 0 0 1 Priority population tailor for - 1 st yr. - - - Total Table 8: Paid media messages disseminated, 2010 2011 Evaluation process measure 1 2 3 4 Number of paid media messages disseminated 1 11 13 2 27 Number of messages covering: Policy adoption 0 0 0 1 1 Policy compliance 0 0 1 2 3 QuitlineNC and cessation services 1 11 13 2 27 Number tailored to a priority population 1 0 0 0 1 Priority population tailor for 1 st yr. - - - - Total Grantee s Perspectives The following is a representative selection of comments made by grantees in their final monthly evaluations that elucidate the mindset present among them that likely drove the sharp decline in activity that was noticeable across evaluation process measures in the final quarter of the fiscal year. Also evident was the fact that grantees were proud of their accomplishments, but ever aware that the mission was not complete. Because of pending legislation and the knowledge that our program may not be around another year has prevented me from reaching out to many of the colleges. I have put many things on hold. The budget situation has made it very tough to plan for the summer. There is so much I want to get accomplished but don't want to leave campuses in the dark! I am not too sure what to say. The program is gone and I hope we have promoted the TFC program enough that it will catch on across the nation. I know there is still work to be done, but overall we have all done a wonderful job at making NC a healthier place to live. Great work! With all of the bad news coming from the State, we made an effort to continue pushing forward with the campuses we are working with to get them to think and plan for the future without us. We gave them as much as we could to help them to continue the great work they are doing. Page 8 NC Tobacco-Free Colleges Phase III Fiscal Year 2010-2011