Appendicular lean mass index (kg/m 2 ), adjusted for fat mass index. Fat mass index (kg/m 1.2 )

Similar documents
Understanding Body Composition

Understanding Clinical Assessment Using The Edmonton Obesity Staging System

Client Sex Facility Birth Date Height Weight Measured ####, #### #### (not specified) #### #### #### ####

Fat Mass. Baseline. (lbs) (lbs) Composition Trend: Total. Aug 17. Apr 17. May 17. Jun 17. Jul 17. Measured Date

Health is Not Measured in Pounds

Population: All participants Number of Obs: Variable # Sas Name: Sas Label: Categories: Variable # Sas Name: F80VNUM. Sas Label: Categories:

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in Dexa Total Body 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

Treatment disparities for patients diagnosed with metastatic bladder cancer in California

The association of the total cardiovascular risk and non-invasive markers of atherosclerosis with the extent of coronary artery disease

Broadening Course YPHY0001 Practical Session II (October 11, 2006) Assessment of Body Fat

BMI may underestimate the socioeconomic gradient in true obesity

Professional Diploma. in Nutrition. Module 1. Lesson 1: Health is Your Wealth EQF Level 5. Professional Diploma

Broadening Course YPHY0001 Practical Session III (March 19, 2008) Assessment of Body Fat

Physique Science. Suite 2a, 76 Commercial Road Newstead, QLD 4006

Understanding & Interpreting Body Composition Measures

Body Composition and Fatness Patterns in Prader-Willi Syndrome: Comparison with Simple Obesity

Current levels and recent trends in health inequalities in the EU: Updates from the EU Report

Fitness and Wellness 12th Edition Hoeger TEST BANK Full download at:

Testosterone therapy (TTh) prevents progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in hypogonadal: 9-year data from a registry study

Physical activity, physical fitness and body composition of Canadian shift workers

Figure S1. Comparison of fasting plasma lipoprotein levels between males (n=108) and females (n=130). Box plots represent the quartiles distribution

DOI: /HAS/AJHS/11.1/

DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY (DXA) GOLD STANDARD FOR BONE HEALTH AND BODY COMPOSITION ASSESSMENT

Metabolic Syndrome and Workplace Outcome

Continuous Update Project Keeping the science current d n u h F c r a e s e r R e c d C l r o Breast Cancer 2010 Report

An important obstacle to the assessment of the prevalence of overweight and obesity in

Treadmill Workstations: A Worksite Physical Activity Intervention

Component of Statistics Canada Catalogue no X Health Fact Sheets. Article. Body Composition of Canadian Adults 2007 to 2009.

Coronary heart disease risk in men and the epidemic of overweight and obesity

EpiDoC data set. W0 EpiReumaPt (CESOP) W0 EpiReumaPt (CESOP)

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in DEXA Scanning 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

7.10 Breast FOOD, NUTRITION, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, AND CANCER OF THE BREAST (POSTMENOPAUSE)

Study of Serum Hepcidin as a Potential Mediator of the Disrupted Iron Metabolism in Obese Adolescents

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in Dexa Scanning 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

Karri Silventoinen University of Helsinki and Osaka University

Is socioeconomic position related to the prevalence of metabolic syndrome? Influence of

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in DEXA Scanning 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

Energy Balance and Weight Management: Finding Your Equilibrium

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in DEXA Scanning 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

Using longitudinal studies to examine changes in health inequality: Cross-cohort differences in body mass index inequality.

Anthropometry: What Can We Measure & What Does It Mean?

THE NEW YOU: HOW TO DETERMINE YOUR PERCENT OF BODY FAT & IDEAL WEIGHT

CHAPTER 9 ADOLESCENT HEALTH

Relationship between prenatal growth, postnatal growth and childhood obesity: a review

THE FIRST NINE MONTHS AND CHILDHOOD OBESITY. Deborah A Lawlor MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit

Client Report Screening Program Results For: Missouri Western State University October 28, 2013

Supplementary Online Content

Impact of infant feeding on growth trajectory patterns in childhood and body composition in young adulthood

Development and Prediction of Hyperactive Behaviour from 2 to 7 Years in a National Population Sample

BMJ - Decision on Manuscript ID BMJ

How much might achievement of diabetes prevention behaviour goals reduce the incidence of diabetes if implemented at the population level?

UICC World Cancer Congress Melbourne, Australia 6 December 2014

CHAPTER 3 DIABETES MELLITUS, OBESITY, HYPERTENSION AND DYSLIPIDEMIA IN ADULT CENTRAL KERALA POPULATION

The Association between Urinary Bisphenol-A, Phthalate Metabolites and Body Fat Composition in US Adults Using NHANES

Elevated Serum Levels of Adropin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and its Association with

EFFECT OF SMOKING ON BODY MASS INDEX: A COMMUNITY-BASED STUDY

DOI: /HAS/AJHS/9.2/

Body Composition and Anthropometric Form

DEXA Bone Mineral Density Tests and Body Composition Analysis Information for Health Professionals

Maternal and Child Undernutrition 2 Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in DEXA Scanning 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

Adult obesity and socioeconomic status data factsheet

10th NESTLE NUTRITION CONFERENCE

Supplementary appendix: Oral polio vaccination and hospital admissions with non-polio infections in Denmark: Nationwide retrospective cohort study

Implementing Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Programmes

WAIST-HEIGHT RATIO : A NEW OBESITY INDEX FOR FILIPINOS?

Age 18 years and older BMI 18.5 and < 25 kg/m 2

EVIDENCE AND INNOVATIVE APPROACHES to REACHING POOR AND MARGINALIZED POPULATIONS. Davidson R. Gwatkin September 2013

Health Survey for England 2015 Adult overweight and obesity

From the Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

Nutritional concerns of overweight / obese older persons. Gordon L Jensen, MD, PhD Dept Nutritional Sciences Penn State University

Body Composition in Healthy Aging

Relationship between physical activity, BMI and waist hip ratio among middle aged women in a multiethnic population: A descriptive study

Socioeconomic status risk factors for cardiovascular diseases by sex in Korean adults

Validation of bioimpedance body composition assessment by TANITA BC-418 in 7 years-

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Age 18 years and older BMI 18.5 and < 25 kg/m 2

Katarzyna Hojan 1, Marta Molińska-Glura 2, Piotr Milecki 3. ECRS Copenhagen 2012

UMHS-PUHSC JOINT INSTITUTE

Epidemiology of Sarcopenia among the Elderly in New Mexico

(Professor, Department of Applied Nutrition and Food Technology, Islamic University, Kushtia, Bangladesh.) 3

Yves Rolland, Valérie Lauwers-Cances, Christelle Cristini, Gabor Abellan van Kan, Ian Janssen, John E Morley, and Bruno Vellas

The role of physical activity in the prevention and management of hypertension and obesity

Mohammad Hajizadeh McGill University PHO-Rounds: Epidemiology 15 August 2013

Healthy PNPLA3 Risk Allele Carriers Present with Unexpected Body Fat Composition. A Study of One Thousand Subjects

Body Composition. Sport Books Publisher 1

Title: Socioeconomic inequalities in stillbirth rates in Europe: measuring the gap using routine data from the Euro-Peristat Project

Index of Central Obesity as a Parameter to Evaluate Metabolic Syndrome for White, Black, and Hispanic Adults in the United States

CHAPTER 9. Anthropometry and Body Composition

NMDF121 Session 24 Nutritional Assessment

Is Food Insecurity Associated with Weight Status in Saudi Women?

Modelling Reduction of Coronary Heart Disease Risk among people with Diabetes

SGRQ Questionnaire assessing respiratory disease-specific quality of life. Questionnaire assessing general quality of life

Yael Leitner, 2 Riva Tauman, 3 Hadas Avni, 1 Anat Drori-Asayag, 4. Haim Nehama, 2 Michal Greenfeld

Dietary soy intake and changes of mammographic density in premenopausal Chinese women

Why Obese People are Unable to Keep Weight Off After Losing It

DXA Body Composition Scan + Visceral Fat Analysis

NUTRITION IN AFRICA. Editor: Demetre Labadarios, MB, ChB, PhD, FACN INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

MIRT Program ABSTRACTS 2011

Life course origins of mental health inequalities in adulthood. Amélie Quesnel-Vallée McGill University

Transcription:

Supplementary Table 1. Differences in fat mass, android: gynoid ratio, and lean mass (95% CI) at age 60 64 years between the hypothetical lowest and highest maternal educational attainment (slope index of inequality), with sequential adjustment for potential mediators Men (n=486) Fat mass index (kg/m 1.2 ) Android: gynoid fat mass ratio 1. Maternal education (6y) 1.32 (0.13, 2.50) 0.03 9.14 (4.11, 14.18) <0.001 2. Model 1 + birth weight 1.32 (0.13, 2.51) 0.03 9.34 (4.36, 14.32) <0.001 3. Model 1 + weight gain from 0-7y 1.69 (0.51, 2.88) 0.01 9.34 (4.30, 14.39) <0.001 4. Model 1 + weight gain from 7-20y 1.17 (0.05, 2.30) 0.04 8.23 (3.14, 13.31) <0.001 5. Model 1 + own education & adult SE 0.67 (-0.61, 1.95) 0.31 6.17 (0.74, 11.60) 0.03 Appendicular lean mass index (kg/m 2 ), adjusted for fat mass index Women (n=517) 1. Maternal education (6y) 3.12 (1.45, 4.79) <0.001 6.41 (2.31, 10.52) <0.001-0.19 (-0.41, 0.03) 0.09 2. Model 2 + birth weight 3.13 (1.45, 4.81) <0.001 6.15 (2.02, 10.27) <0.001-0.16 (-0.38, 0.06) 0.16 3. Model 1 + weight gain from 0-7y 3.14 (1.48, 4.81) <0.001 6.13 (2.01, 10.26) <0.001-0.14 (-0.36, 0.07) 0.19 4. Model 1 + weight gain from 7-20y 2.68 (1.10, 4.25) <0.001 5.79 (1.70, 9.87) 0.01-0.17 (-0.38, 0.04) 0.12 5. Model 1 + own education & adult SE 2.20 (0.37, 4.04) 0.02 4.67 (0.19, 9.15) 0.04-0.06 (-0.30, 0.19) 0.65 otes: occupational class was that of the highest in the household and derived using the Registrar General s classification; analyses were restricted to those with valid measures for each indicator of socioeconomic position, relevant potential mediators and all body composition outcomes. Cells are blank where analyses were not included due to lack of evidence for association in univariable analyses (p>0.05)

Supplementary Table 2. Differences in fat mass, android: gynoid ratio, and lean mass (95% CI) at age 60 64 years between the hypothetical lowest and highest paternal occupational class (slope index of inequality), with sequential adjustment for potential mediators Men (n=501) Fat mass index (kg/m 1.2 ) Android: gynoid fat mass ratio 1. aternal occupational class (4y) 1.02 (-0.10, 2.15) 0.07 7.93 (3.13, 12.72) <0.001 2. Model 1 + birth weight 1.03 (-0.10, 2.15) 0.07 8.06 (3.30, 12.81) <0.001 3. Model 1 + weight gain from 0-7y 1.40 (0.28, 2.52) 0.01 8.17 (3.35, 12.99) <0.001 4. Model 1 + weight gain from 7-20y 0.87 (-0.20, 1.94) 0.11 7.17 (2.30, 12.04) <0.001 5. Model 1 + own education & adult SE 0.27 (-0.97, 1.50) 0.67 4.53 (-0.74, 9.80) 0.09 Appendicular lean mass index (kg/m 2 ), adjusted for fat mass index Women (n=533) 1. aternal occupational class (4y) 3.13 (1.62, 4.65) <0.001 6.80 (3.10, 10.51) <0.001-0.24 (-0.44, -0.04) 0.02 2. Model 1 + birth weight 3.14 (1.62, 4.66) <0.001 6.68 (2.97, 10.39) <0.001-0.23 (-0.42, -0.03) 0.03 3. Model 1 + weight gain from 0-7y 3.35 (1.85, 4.86) <0.001 6.61 (2.89, 10.33) <0.001-0.17 (-0.36, 0.03) 0.09 4. Model 1 + weight gain from 7-20y 2.95 (1.52, 4.37) <0.001 6.18 (2.49, 9.87) <0.001-0.18 (-0.37, 0.01) 0.07 5. Model 1 + own education & adult SE 2.27 (0.58, 3.96) 0.01 5.25 (1.14, 9.36) 0.01-0.09 (-0.31, 0.13) 0.41 otes: occupational class was that of the highest in the household and derived using the Registrar General s classification; analyses were restricted to those with valid measures for each indicator of socioeconomic position, relevant potential mediators and all body composition outcomes. Cells are blank where analyses were not included due to lack of evidence for association in univariable analyses (p>0.05)

Supplementary Table 3. Differences in android and gynoid fat mass (95% CI) at age 60 64 years between the hypothetical lowest and highest socioeconomic position (slope index of inequality) Android fat mass (kg) Gynoid fat mass (kg) Men Women Men Women aternal occ. class (4y) 710/767 0.27(0.02, 0.52) 0.03 0.48(0.23, 0.73) <0.01-0.02(-0.28, 0.24) 0.89 0.48(0.11, 0.84) 0.01 Maternal education (6y) 668/721 0.34(0.06, 0.62) 0.02 0.55(0.27, 0.82) <0.01 0.09(-0.21, 0.39) 0.54 0.61(0.20, 1.01) <0.01 aternal education (6y) 660/718 0.34(0.06, 0.62) 0.02 0.75(0.48, 1.02) <0.01 0.03(-0.27, 0.32) 0.85 0.68(0.29, 1.08) <0.01 Own education (26y) 704/771 0.42(0.19, 0.65) <0.01 0.37(0.10, 0.64) <0.01 0.17(-0.08, 0.43) 0.17 0.41(0.02, 0.81) 0.04 Occupational class (53y) 739/789 0.18(-0.07, 0.43) 0.16 0.46(0.19, 0.73) <0.01 0.02(-0.24, 0.29) 0.86 0.48(0.08, 0.88) 0.02 Household income (60-64y) 711/770 0.30(0.07, 0.54) 0.01 0.42(0.17, 0.67) <0.01 0.20(-0.05, 0.46) 0.12 0.52(0.15, 0.89) <0.01 otes: Occupational class was that of the highest in the household and derived using the Registrar General s classification; analyses were restricted to those with valid measures for all body composition outcomes.

Supplementary Table 4. Differences in anthropometric indicators of fat mass (95% CI) at age 60 64 years between the hypothetical lowest and highest socioeconomic position (slope index of inequality) analyses restricted to those with valid measures for all DXA body composition outcomes Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) Waist circumference (cm) Men Women # Men Women # aternal occ. class (4y) 710/767 1.75(0.72, 2.78) <0.01 2.47(1.22, 3.72) <0.01 0.39 2.96(0.19, 5.73) 0.04 5.34(2.26, 8.42) <0.01 0.26 Maternal education (6y) 668/721 1.83(0.69, 2.97) <0.01 2.50(1.08, 3.91) <0.01 0.48 4.09(1.02, 7.16) <0.01 5.23(1.78, 8.68) <0.01 0.63 aternal education (6y) 660/718 1.57(0.45, 2.69) <0.01 3.43(2.06, 4.81) <0.01 0.04 3.95(0.94, 6.97) 0.01 7.53(4.17, 10.89) <0.01 0.12 Own education (26y) 704/771 2.27(1.24, 3.31) <0.01 1.82(0.57, 3.07) <0.01 0.59 6.06(3.27, 8.84) <0.01 4.31(1.20, 7.42) <0.01 0.42 Occupational class (53y) 739/789 1.11(0.05, 2.17) 0.04 1.86(0.52, 3.19) <0.01 0.39 2.95(0.10, 5.81) 0.04 4.79(1.52, 8.06) <0.01 0.41 Household income (60-64y) 711/770 0.88(-0.12, 1.87) 0.09 2.01(0.77, 3.25) <0.01 0.17 2.96(0.25, 5.67) 0.03 4.59(1.55, 7.63) <0.01 0.44 Hip circumference (cm) Waist: hip ratio Men Women # Men Women # aternal occ. class (4y) 710/767-0.06(-1.94, 1.82) 0.95 3.09(0.47, 5.71) 0.02 0.06 0.03(0.01, 0.05) <0.01 0.03(0.01, 0.04) <0.01 0.81 Maternal education (6y) 668/721 1.38(-0.71, 3.47) 0.20 4.30(1.35, 7.25) <0.01 0.12 0.03(0.01, 0.05) <0.01 0.01(0.00, 0.03) 0.14 0.32 aternal education (6y) 660/718 0.53(-1.53, 2.59) 0.61 5.88(3.00, 8.76) <0.01 <0.01 0.03(0.01, 0.05) <0.01 0.02(0.01, 0.04) <0.01 0.51 Own education (26y) 704/771 1.22(-0.69, 3.12) 0.21 2.67(0.05, 5.29) 0.05 0.39 0.05(0.03, 0.06) <0.01 0.02(0.00, 0.04) 0.02 0.02 Occupational class (53y) 739/789 0.28(-1.65, 2.22) 0.77 3.14(0.36, 5.91) 0.03 0.10 0.03(0.01, 0.04) <0.01 0.02(0.00, 0.04) 0.02 0.68 Household income (60-64y) 711/770-0.08(-1.92, 1.76) 0.93 3.78(1.21, 6.35) <0.01 0.02 0.03(0.01, 0.04) <0.01 0.01(0.00, 0.03) 0.09 0.21 ote: mean (SD) are as follows: Body mass index (kg/m 2 ): 27.74 (3.94) in men, 27.51 (5.02) in women Waist circumference (cm): 100.27 (10.56) in men, 91.47 (12.35) in women Hip circumference (cm): 104.14 (7.14) in men, 105.90 (10.44) in women Waist-hip ratio: 0.96 (0.06) in men, 0.86 (0.07) in women. Occupational class was that of the highest in the household and derived using the Registrar General s classification

Supplementary Table 5. Differences in anthropometric indicators of fat mass (95% CI) at age 60 64 years between the hypothetical lowest and highest socioeconomic position (slope index of inequality) analyses restricted to those with valid measures for anthropometric outcomes Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) Waist circumference (cm) Men Women # Men Women # aternal occ. class (4y) 1013/1095 1.92(1.03, 2.81) <0.01 3.32(2.17, 4.47) <0.01 0.06 4.01(1.61, 6.41) <0.01 6.94(4.22, 9.66) <0.01 0.12 Maternal education (6y) 955/1029 1.97(0.97, 2.97) <0.01 3.65(2.31, 4.98) <0.01 0.05 4.62(1.92, 7.33) <0.01 7.48(4.35, 10.61) <0.01 0.18 aternal education (6y) 944/1023 1.88(0.91, 2.86) <0.01 3.94(2.64, 5.24) <0.01 0.01 5.19(2.56, 7.83) <0.01 8.39(5.34, 11.44) <0.01 0.12 Own education (26y) 1003/1100 2.44(1.54, 3.34) <0.01 2.74(1.58, 3.90) <0.01 0.69 6.89(4.48, 9.30) <0.01 6.35(3.59, 9.10) <0.01 0.77 Occupational class (53y) 1053/1119 1.48(0.57, 2.39) <0.01 1.98(0.83, 3.14) <0.01 0.51 4.44(2.00, 6.88) <0.01 4.08(1.24, 6.91) <0.01 0.85 Household income (60-64y) 1004/1086 1.17(0.29, 2.05) <0.01 2.41(1.27, 3.54) <0.01 0.09 3.39(1.01, 5.76) <0.01 5.13(2.45, 7.81) <0.01 0.34 Hip circumference (cm) Waist: hip ratio Men Women # Men Women # aternal occ. class (4y) 1013/1095 1.04(-0.59, 2.67) 0.21 4.81(2.43, 7.18) <0.01 0.01 0.03(0.02, 0.04) <0.01 0.03(0.01, 0.04) <0.01 0.78 Maternal education (6y) 955/1029 1.59(-0.25, 3.43) 0.09 6.24(3.49, 8.98) <0.01 <0.01 0.03(0.02, 0.05) <0.01 0.02(0.00, 0.04) 0.02 0.29 aternal education (6y) 944/1023 1.30(-0.50, 3.10) 0.16 6.42(3.74, 9.10) <0.01 <0.01 0.04(0.02, 0.05) <0.01 0.03(0.01, 0.04) <0.01 0.35 Own education (26y) 1003/1100 1.58(-0.08, 3.24) 0.06 4.26(1.87, 6.65) <0.01 0.08 0.05(0.04, 0.06) <0.01 0.02(0.01, 0.04) <0.01 <0.01 Occupational class (53y) 1053/1119 0.78(-0.88, 2.44) 0.36 3.07(0.64, 5.50) 0.01 0.13 0.03(0.02, 0.05) <0.01 0.01(0.00, 0.03) 0.10 0.04 Household income (60-64y) 1004/1086 0.37(-1.24, 1.99) 0.65 4.15(1.84, 6.46) <0.01 0.01 0.03(0.02, 0.04) <0.01 0.02(0.00, 0.03) 0.03 0.16 otes: Occupational class was that of the highest in the household and derived using the Registrar General s classification