Appendix C CHANGING THE TRAJECTORY:

Similar documents
Alzheimer s: Our Next Public Health Success Story. John Shean, MPH Associate Director, Public Health Alzheimer s Association

Funding Community Mental Health Services. March 1, 2017 Rebecca C. Farley, MPH National Council for Behavioral Health

Evaluations. Dementia Update: A New National Plan for Alzheimer s Disease Research, Care and Services. Disclosure Statements.

Alzheimer s disease affects patients and their caregivers. experience employment complications,

2018 Candidate Guide. Leading in the fight to end Alzheimer's

Cost of Mental Health Care

President Clinton's proposal for health reform contains a plan for

Peter Attia had just become the first person to swim from Maui to Lanai and back (a 25-mile round trip). Age: 35 Weight: 200 lbs.

PREVENTION FOR A HEALTHIER AMERICA: Investments in Disease Prevention Yield Significant Savings, Stronger Communities

Quad Cities July 3, 2008

Low Back Pain Report October 2013: Cost and Utilization of Health Care in Oregon

Chronicity and Aging: The Geriatric Imperative

National Dental Expenditure Flat Since 2008, Began to Slow in 2002

Testimony of Robert Egge, Vice President of Public Policy Alzheimer s Association. December 8, 2010

Do OurHealth primary care clinics improve health & reduce healthcare costs? OurHealth Patient Engagement Analysis June 2018

The cost-effectiveness of raising the legal smoking age in California Ahmad S

Alex Azar Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services

The Alzheimer s Association for Clinicians, Patients and Caregivers. Christina Holch, MHA Healthcare Outreach Manager & State Policy Lead

5 $3 billion per disease

April 24, testimony. The AGS is a non-profit organization of nearly 6,000 geriatrics healthcare

Mental health planners and policymakers routinely rely on utilization

The clinical and economic benefits of better treatment of adult Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes

Per Capita Health Care Spending on Diabetes:

Statewide Statistics and Key Findings 1

SUPPORT FEDERAL FUNDING FOR PARKINSON S DISEASE RESEARCH AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT

Vaccine Financing and Delivery: Room for Improvement

Demonstrating Return on Investment for Community Health Worker Services Translating Science into Practice

Public Health and the Promise of Prevention

Effective Technology and Its Economic Benefits: The Case of Colonoscopy

Obesity: Trends, Impact, Complexity

Healthcare Transformation: Translating Aspiration into Action. Charlotte Yeh, MD Chief Medical Officer, AARP Services, Inc.

National health-care expenditures are projected to rise to $5.2 trillion by 2023

medicaid and the The Role of Medicaid for People with Diabetes

An Unhealthy America: The Economic Burden of Chronic Disease

National Plan to Address Alzheimer s Disease

Asthma Management and the Allergist

Financial Impact of Emergency Department Visits by Adults for Dental Conditions in Maryland

Merkin Brain and Health Policy Innovation Program 2013

c i r c l e o f l i f e a w a r d C I R C L E o f L I F E

The Need to Address Alzheimer s Disease WOMEN IN GOVERNMENT CARROLL RODRIGUEZ ALZHEIMER S ASSOCIATION ST. LOUIS CHAPTER

Alzheimer s Disease and Related Disorders: The Public Health Call to Action

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 35, No. 4, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /00/$20.

Memory Research Suite

Statement Of. The National Association of Chain Drug Stores. For. U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Budget.

04 Chapter Four Treatment modalities. Experience does not err, it is only your judgement that errs in expecting from her what is not in her power.

A17/B17: Delirium Can Be Deadly: Save Lives With a Standardized Approach to Delirium IHI 25th Annual National Forum, December 10, 2013

Connecticut Family Planning Expansion and Effect on IUD Adoption. Susan Lane, Planned Parenthood of Southern New England, Inc.

March 8, Written Testimony for FY 2018 Appropriations for the Department of Health and Human Services

Heart Attack Readmissions in Virginia

Funding the Ryan White Program: Now and in the Future

Executive Summary. Burton Edelstein DDS MPH. Donald Schneider DDS MPH. R. Jeffrey Laughlin MPH

THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, MEDICAID & RYAN WHITE: THE HIV VOTE. Daniel Tietz, RN, JD Executive Director

Shaping our future: a call to action to tackle the diabetes epidemic and reduce its economic impact

Amy Hanley Senior Workforce and Health Policy Specialist American Society of Clinical Oncology

Like others here today, we are very conflicted on the FDA s proposal on behind-thecounter medications, but thank you for raising the issue.

Meltdown : Investing in Prevention. October 7, 2008

Medicare Severity-adjusted Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs) Coding Adjustment

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MEDICAID PAYMENTS FOR DIABETIC TESTING SUPPLIES. Report 2008-S-123 OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER

a call to states: make alzheimer s a policy priority

Alzheimer s Disease Facts

Behavioral Health Hospital and Emergency Department Health Services Utilization

Expiring Medicare Provider Payment Policies. United States House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health

Statement Of. The National Association of Chain Drug Stores. For. U.S. Senate Finance Committee. Hearing on:

The United States of Diabetes: Challenges and opportunities in the decade ahead

Drugs for Rare Disorders

Questions and Answers on 2009 H1N1 Vaccine Financing

Hospice and Palliative Care An Essential Component of the Aging Services Network

AACE LEGISLATIVE FACT SHEET

Statement Of. The National Association of Chain Drug Stores. For. U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. Hearing on:

Mental Illness and Substance Use Hospitalizations in New Hampshire,

Issue Brief. Coverage Matters: The Role of Insurance in Access to Dental Care in California. Introduction

2

Health Care Reform: Implications for Public Health. Susan Polan, PhD. American University Next steps in Health Reform 2017

Medicare, Medicaid, and Children's Health Insurance Programs: Announcement of the

Medication trends shaping workers compensation. A 2018 update of the prevailing industry influences impacting pharmacy outcomes

Merkin Brain and Health Policy Innovation Program 2013

CDC s Chronic Disease Cost Calculator

Vermont Department of Health Ladies First Program Program Outreach Plan

Chronic Diseases in the Elderly. Steven L. Phillips, MD Medical Director Sanford Center for Aging University of Nevada, Reno

THE EARLY TREATMENT FOR HIV ACT: MEDICAID COVERAGE FOR PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV

MArch The 2014 Drug Trend Report Highlights

Making Diabetes Prevention a Reality: The National Diabetes Prevention Program

Treated Chronic Disease Costs in Minnesota a Look Back and a Look Forward. Developing Estimates for 2009 and 2014 and Projecting 2023 Costs

REIMBURSEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON YOUR DIALYSIS PROGRAM Tony Messana Executive Director Renal Services St. Joseph Hospital - Orange

Hospital Discharge Data

Miami-Dade County Prepaid Dental Health Plan Demonstration: Less Value for State Dollars

Alzheimer s Strategic Plan:

Cost Effectiveness of Access to Hearing Care: An Analysis of CMS Data

REPORT OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE

Acute Care for Elders- Improving the Quality and Safety of Older Hospitalized Patients

HPV & CERVICAL CANCER POLICY & LEGISLATIVE TOOLKIT, 3 RD EDITION

Putting NICE guidance into practice. Resource impact report: Hearing loss in adults: assessment and management (NG98)

Overweight and Obesity Rates Among Upstate New York Adults

DISCOVER INVEGA TRINZA

CHANGE TODAY FOR A HEALTHIER FUTURE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM OVERVIEW

11/5/2018. Alzheimer s Disease Working Group: An Update. Learning Objectives. Facts & Figures

STATEMENT OF THE NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION SUBMITTED TO THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS;

The ALS Association Mid-America Chapter 87 people in Nebraska have ALS. Every 90 minutes, someone is diagnosed with or passes away from ALS.

New Jersey s Comprehensive Tobacco Control Program: Importance of Sustained Funding

Positive Living Conference

Transcription:

Appendix C CHANGING THE TRAJECTORY: Impact of a Hypothetical Treatment That Slows the Progression of Alzheimer s In addition to the delayed onset scenario discussed in the report, another potential scenario is a treatment that slows the progression of Alzheimer s disease. Unlike a treatment to delay the onset of Alzheimer s, a hypothetical treatment that slows disease progression would result in more people living with Alzheimer s in the future. In this scenario, a larger segment of the population is expected to live with Alzheimer s in the mild and moderate stages, with fewer individuals in the severe stage and fewer deaths due to Alzheimer s. Each year, under this treatment scenario, 10 percent of people living with Alzheimer s in the mild stage will move to the moderate stage and 5 percent of people living with Alzheimer s in the moderate stage will move to the severe stage. This Appendix explores the outcomes of such a treatment, assuming it is available by the National Plan s goal of 2025.

Number of Americans Living with Alzheimer s Disease A treatment introduced in 2025 that slows the progression of Alzheimer s would gradually increase the number of individuals affected by the disease shortly after it became available. For example, in 2030, the total number of Americans age 65 and older living with Alzheimer s would increase from 8.2 million to 8.5 million (Figure 1). This trend would continue in subsequent years as more individuals expected to develop Alzheimer s live longer with the disease. In 2035, 10.6 million Americans would be expected to have Alzheimer s compared to 9.9 million Americans under the current trajectory. In 2050, 15 million Americans would be expected to have the disease, compared to 13.5 million Americans if there were no available treatment in 2025. A treatment introduced in 2025 that slows the progression of Alzheimer s would also increase the proportion of the U.S. population age 65 and older with the condition. In 2030, 12 percent of older adults would be living with Alzheimer s disease instead of 11 percent. In 2050, 18 percent of older adults would have Alzheimer s instead of 16 percent. FIGURE 1 Impact of a Treatment That Slows Progression on the Number of Americans Age 65 and Older Living with Alzheimer s Disease, 2015-2050 Number of Americans with Alzheimer s (millions) 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 Current trajectory 5.1 5.8 6.8 8.2 9.9 11.6 12.8 13.5 Slowed progression 5.1 5.8 6.8 8.5 10.6 12.6 14.1 15.0 Increase 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.5 *Totals may not add due to rounding. 2

FIGURE 2 Impact of a Treatment That Slows Progression on the Proportion of Americans Age 65 and Older Living with Alzheimer s by Disease Stage, 2050 2050 Current Trajectory 13.5 million 2050 Slowed Progression 15 million Mild 23% Severe 8% Severe 48% Moderate 28% Moderate 33% Mild 59% *Totals may not add due to rounding. Number of Americans Living with Alzheimer s by Stage of Disease The introduction of a treatment in 2025 that slows the progression of Alzheimer s would increase the proportion of those in the mild and moderate stages, but reduce the proportion of individuals in the severe stage. This is because a larger segment of the population would live longer in the mild and moderate stages of Alzheimer s after the introduction of such a treatment. Thus, in 2030, 57 percent of individuals living with Alzheimer s would be in the mild stage if a treatment breakthrough were available, compared to 29 percent under the current trajectory. The proportion of individuals living with Alzheimer s in the severe stage would decrease from 41 percent in 2030 under the current trajectory to 18 percent with this hypothetical treatment. In 2050, the proportion of individuals in the mild, moderate and severe stages of Alzheimer s would change noticeably if a treatment were available to slow the progression of the disease. As shown in Figure 2, the proportion of individuals in the mild stage increases from 23 percent to 59 percent and the proportion of individuals in the moderate stage increases from 28 percent to 33 percent. This means in 2050, under this treatment scenario, 8.9 million individuals living with Alzheimer s would be in the mild stage and 4.9 million individuals living with Alzheimer s would be in the moderate stage; compared to 3.1 million and 3.8 million, respectively, under the current trajectory. The most dramatic change is the proportion of individuals in the severe stage decreasing from 48 percent to 8 percent if a hypothetical treatment were available. This means the number of individuals expected to be living in the severe stage of Alzheimer s in 2050 would drop from 6.5 million to 1.2 million. 3

Costs of Care A treatment in 2025 that slows the progression of Alzheimer s disease would reduce the total costs of care, compared to the current trajectory. In 2030, total costs to all payers would decrease from $451 billion under the current trajectory to $359 billion with a treatment, a savings of $92 billion (Figure 3). In 2050, total costs to all payers would decrease from $1.101 trillion under the current trajectory to $837 billion with a treatment, a savings of $264 billion. Reductions in Medicare costs account for nearly 40 percent of the savings under this treatment scenario. After introduction of a treatment to slow the progression of Alzheimer s, Medicare costs for people living with Alzheimer s would decrease to $198 billion in 2030, $35 billion less than the $233 billion under the current trajectory. In 2050, Medicare costs would be $485 billion, $104 billion less than the $589 billion under the current trajectory (Figure 4). A treatment that slows the progression of Alzheimer s would also decrease Medicaid costs for people living with the disease. In 2030, Medicaid costs for people living with Alzheimer s would be reduced by $27 billion, from $77 billion to $50 billion (Figure 5). In 2050, Medicaid costs would be $102 billion, $74 billion less than the current trajectory ($176 billion). FIGURE 3 Impact of a Treatment That Slows Progression on Total Costs of Care for Americans Age 65 and Older Living with Alzheimer s Disease and Other Dementias, 2015-2050 $1,200 Total costs of care (billions $) $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 0.0 Current trajectory $226 $267 $340 $451 $596 $767 $942 $1,101 Slowed progression $226 $267 $340 $359 $448 $575 $710 $837 Savings $0 $0 $0 $92 $148 $193 $232 $264 *All cost figures are reported in 2015 dollars. Totals may not add due to rounding. 4

FIGURE 4 Impact of a Treatment That Slows Progression on Medicare Costs, 2015-2050 $600 Medicare costs (billions $) $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 Current trajectory $113 $134 $173 $233 $311 $403 $499 $589 Slowed progression $113 $134 $173 $198 $254 $330 $409 $485 Savings $0 $0 $0 $35 $56 $74 $90 $104 *All cost figures are reported in 2015 dollars. Totals may not add due to rounding. FIGURE 5 Impact of a Treatment That Slows Progression on Medicaid Costs, 2015-2050 $200 Medicaid costs (billions $) $150 $100 $50 $0 Current trajectory $41 $48 $59 $77 $100 $126 $153 $176 Slowed progression $41 $48 $59 $50 $57 $71 $87 $102 Savings $0 $0 $0 $27 $43 $56 $66 $74 *All cost figures are reported in 2015 dollars. Totals may not add due to rounding. 5

FIGURE 6 Impact of a Treatment That Slows Progression on Out-Of-Pocket Costs, 2015-2050 $200 Out-of-pocket costs (billions $) $150 $100 $50 $0 Current trajectory $44 $51 $64 $84 $110 $140 $171 $198 Delayed progression $44 $51 $64 $62 $75 $95 $117 $137 Savings $0 $0 $0 $22 $35 $45 $54 $61 *All cost figures are reported in 2015 dollars. Totals may not add due to rounding. People living with Alzheimer s and their families would also see a reduction in their out-of-pocket costs under this treatment scenario. Out-of-pocket costs in 2030 would decline from $84 billion to $62 billion. In 2050, out-of-pocket costs decline to $137 billion, $61 billion less than the current trajectory of $198 billion (Figure 6). A treatment that slows progression would also reduce costs to other payers over time. In 2030, costs to other payers such as private insurance, HMOs and other managed care organizations, and those that cover uncompensated care would decrease from $58 billion to $49 billion. In 2050, costs to other payers would be $25 billion less, falling from $138 billion to $113 billion. The costs of care in this section do not include the costs of a hypothetical treatment to slow the progression of Alzheimer s disease. As mentioned in the report, costs for such a treatment would be influenced by a number of factors such as the costs associated with the development of a treatment, the delivery costs of a treatment, the length of the treatment and any related government policy changes. 6

The 10-Year Budget Impact Similar to a hypothetical treatment that delays the onset of Alzheimer s, a hypothetical treatment that slows its progression would have an impact on the costs of caring for people with the disease within the first 10 years of its introduction. This section explores the cost implications on various payers for the 10-year budget period following the introduction of such a treatment in 2025. 10-Year Costs of Care Based on the Current Trajectory In the 10-year window following 2025, as highlighted in the report, the total annual costs to all payers for the care of people living with Alzheimer s and other dementias under the current trajectory will increase from $360 billion in 2026 to $596 billion in 2035. Table 1 illustrates these costs paid by Medicare, Medicaid, affected individuals and their families, and other payers such as private insurance, HMOs and other managed care organizations, and those that cover uncompensated care. It is restated here for comparison purposes. In this 10-year period, Medicare costs for people with Alzheimer s and other dementias are projected to grow from $184 billion in 2026 to $311 billion in 2035. Medicaid costs will also increase from $62 billion in 2026 to $100 billion in 2035. Cumulatively over the course of this 10-year period, federal and state governments will pay an estimated $3.2 trillion to care for people with Alzheimer s and other dementias. Likewise, out-of-pocket costs for people affected by Alzheimer s will increase from $68 billion in 2026 to $110 billion in 2035. Costs to other payers will also increase from $46 billion in 2026 to $76 billion in 2035. Over this 10-year period, individuals and families affected by Alzheimer s will cumulatively pay $877 billion. Similarly, cumulative costs for other payers will be $601 billion over the same period. TABLE 1 Baseline Costs of Caring for Individuals with Alzheimer s Disease and Other Dementias (in billions of 2015 dollars) 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 10-Year Costs Medicare $184 $195 $207 $220 $233 $248 $263 $278 $294 $311 $2,433 Medicaid $62 $66 $69 $73 $77 $81 $86 $90 $95 $100 $797 Out-of-Pocket $68 $72 $76 $80 $84 $89 $94 $99 $105 $110 $877 Other payers $46 $49 $52 $55 $58 $61 $65 $68 $72 $76 $601 Total costs $360 $381 $403 $427 $451 $480 $507 $536 $566 $596 $4,708 *Totals may not add due to rounding. 7

Impact of a Hypothetical Treatment That Slows the Progression of Alzheimer s Disease on the 10-Year Costs of Care As mentioned in the previous section, if a hypothetical treatment became available in 2025 that slows the progression of Alzheimer s disease, it would decrease the total costs of care immediately. Table 2 illustrates the savings that would be achieved if a treatment that slows the progression of Alzheimer s became available in 2025. In the first year, Medicare would save $9 billion. In 2035, Medicare savings would total $56 billion. Medicaid savings would grow from $7 billion in 2026 to $43 billion in 2035, compared to the current trajectory. Over the course of the 10 year period, the cumulative savings for federal and state governments would be $628 billion. Similarly, if a hypothetical treatment were available in 2025, families affected by Alzheimer s disease would see an immediate decrease in their out-of-pocket spending. In 2026, individuals living with Alzheimer s and their families would spend $5 billion less on their costs of care. In 2035, these savings would grow to $35 billion. Savings for other payers would increase from $2 billion in 2026 to $14 billion in 2035. From 2026 to 2035, total savings for all payers would be $937 billion nearly 20 percent of the total costs under the current trajectory. TABLE 2 Savings from a Treatment in 2025 That Slows the Progression Alzheimer s Disease (in billions of 2015 dollars) 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 10-Year Savings Medicare -$9 -$17 -$23 -$30 -$35 -$40 -$45 -$49 -$53 -$56 -$357 Medicaid -$7 -$13 -$18 -$22 -$27 -$31 -$34 -$37 -$40 -$43 -$271 Out-of-Pocket -$5 -$10 -$15 -$18 -$22 -$25 -$28 -$30 -$33 -$35 -$221 Other -$2 -$4 -$6 -$7 -$9 -$10 -$11 -$12 -$13 -$14 -$88 Total -$23 -$44 -$62 -$78 -$92 -$106 -$118 -$129 -$139 -$148 -$937 *Totals may not add due to rounding. 8