Supplementary Online Content

Similar documents
Panel III (ATP-III), and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines using a cohort of Dutch individuals aged 55 years or older.

Supplementary Online Content

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Lipid Management 2013 Statin Benefit Groups

Supplementary Online Content

Atherosclerotic Disease Risk Score

New Guidelines in Dyslipidemia Management

2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines on the Assessment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk: Overview and Commentary

Review current guideline recommendations for lipid-lowering therapy

Using Cardiovascular Risk to Guide Antihypertensive Treatment Implications For The Pre-elderly and Elderly

CONTRIBUTING FACTORS FOR STROKE:

CVD Prevention, Who to Consider

Update on Lipid Management in Cardiovascular Disease: How to Understand and Implement the New ACC/AHA Guidelines

New Guidelines in Dyslipidemia Management

CVD Risk Assessment. Michal Vrablík Charles University, Prague Czech Republic

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

2013 ACC AHA LIPID GUIDELINE JAY S. FONTE, MD

How would you manage Ms. Gold

CLINICAL OUTCOME Vs SURROGATE MARKER

Supplementary Online Content

Intercommunale de Santé Publique du Pays de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium 2

Guidelines on cardiovascular risk assessment and management

HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN THE OLDER POPULATION NICOLE SLATER, PHARMD, BCACP AUBURN UNIVERSITY, HARRISON SCHOOL OF PHARMACY JULY 16, 2016

A: Epidemiology update. Evidence that LDL-C and CRP identify different high-risk groups

Analyzing Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors and Proper Clinical Prescription of Statins. Peter Thorne

Cholesterol Management Roy Gandolfi, MD

LIPID GUIDELINES: 2015

Optimizing risk assessment of total cardiovascular risk What are the tools? Lars Rydén Professor Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden

Prevention of Heart Disease: The New Guidelines

4/7/ The stats on heart disease. + Deaths & Age-Adjusted Death Rates for

Identification of subjects at high risk for cardiovascular disease

Module 2. Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Reduction in Women with Hypertension

The recently released American College of Cardiology

Supplementary Online Content

THE ESC/EAS LIPID GUIDELINES IN THE ELDERLY

Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE General practice Indicators for the NICE menu

Disclosures. Prevention of Heart Disease: The New Guidelines. Summary of Talk. Four guidelines. No relevant disclosures.

Highlights of the new blood pressure and cholesterol guidelines: A whole new philosophy. Jeremy L. Johnson, PharmD, BCACP, CDE, BC-ADM

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

Supplementary Online Material

Lipid Panel Management Refresher Course for the Family Physician

2013 Cholesterol Guidelines. Anna Broz MSN, RN, CNP, AACC Adult Certified Nurse Practitioner North Ohio Heart, Inc.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has received

Supplementary Online Content

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters

Appendix This appendix was part of the submitted manuscript and has been peer reviewed. It is posted as supplied by the authors.

1. Which one of the following patients does not need to be screened for hyperlipidemia:

An update on lipidology and cardiovascular risk management. Lipids, Metabolism & Vascular Risk Section - Royal Society of Medicine

Clinical Investigations

Supplementary Online Content

PCSK9 Agents Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

Ischemic Heart and Cerebrovascular Disease. Harold E. Lebovitz, MD, FACE Kathmandu November 2010

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

9/18/2017 DISCLOSURES. Consultant: RubiconMD. Research: Amgen, NHLBI OUTLINE OBJECTIVES. Review current CV risk assessment tools.

Protecting the heart and kidney: implications from the SHARP trial

Drug Class Monograph


Know Your Number Aggregate Report Single Analysis Compared to National Averages

2013 Hypertension Measure Group Patient Visit Form

REPATHA (PCSK9 INHIBITORS)

Treatment to reduce cardiovascular risk: multifactorial management

Long-Term Complications of Diabetes Mellitus Macrovascular Complication

Common Cardiovascular Risk Calculators

What do the guidelines say about combination therapy?

CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORS & TARGET ORGAN DAMAGE IN GREEK HYPERTENSIVES

Although the 2013 American College of Cardiology/

Soo LIM, MD, PHD Internal Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

Pharmacy Drug Class Review

Achieving Cholesterol Management Goals: Identifying Clinician-Centered Challenges to Optimal Patient Care

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

9/29/2015. Primary Prevention of Heart Disease: Objectives. Objectives. What works? What doesn t?

Re-assessing the role of non-fasting lipids; a change in perspective

UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs

Current Cholesterol Guidelines and Treatment of Residual Risk COPYRIGHT. J. Peter Oettgen, MD

Dyslipedemia New Guidelines

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials EXPLAINING THE DECREASE IN DEATHS FROM CHD! PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN EXPLAINING THE DECREASE IN

GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

USRDS UNITED STATES RENAL DATA SYSTEM

DYSLIPIDEMIA RECOMMENDATIONS

Epidemiologic and clinical comparison of renal artery stenosis in black patients and white patients

Serum levels of galectin-1, galectin-3, and galectin-9 are associated with large artery atherosclerotic

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY VOL. 64, NO. 10, 2014 ª 2014 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION ISSN /$36.

Supplementary Online Content

Primary prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: Differences between European and United States Guidelines

Diabetes Mellitus: A Cardiovascular Disease

Felix Vallotton Ball (1899) LDL-C management in Asian diabetes: moderate vs. high intensity statin --- a lesson from EMPATHY study

NEW GUIDELINES FOR CHOLESTEROL

Learning Objectives. Patient Case

Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials

The Metabolic Syndrome: Is It A Valid Concept? YES

Disclosures No relationships (not even to an employer) No off-label uses. Cholesterol Lowering Guidelines: What now?

2.3 CONTACT HOURS. Managing. By Kristine Anne Scordo, PhD, RN, ACNP-BC, FAANP

Transcription:

Supplementary Online Content Kavousi M, Leening MJG, Nanchen D, et al. Comparison of application of the ACC/AHA guidelines, Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, and European Society of Cardiology guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in a European cohort. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2632 eappendix. Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Medication Use and Main Outcome Measures etable 1. Treatment Recommendations Based on the ACC/AHA Guidelines etable 2. Treatment Recommendations Based on the ATP-III Guidelines etable 3. Treatment Recommendations Based on the ESC Guidelines etable 4. Characteristics of the Study Population for Hard ASCVD Risk Estimation etable 5. Characteristics of the Study Population for Hard CHD Risk Estimation etable 6. Characteristics of the Study Population for CVD Mortality Risk Estimation etable 7. Population at Different Risk Categories Based on the Three Risk Prediction Models efigure 1. Treatment Recommendations for Rotterdam Study Participants 55-65 Years Old (N=2069) and 65-75 Years Old (N=2140), Based on the 2013 ACC/AHA, 2001 ATP-III, and 2012 ESC Guidelines efigure 2. Observed 10-Year Risks of Hard ASCVD by Deciles of Predicted 10- Year Risk by the 2013 ACC/AHA Risk Prediction Model efigure 3. Observed 10-Year Risks of Hard CHD by Deciles of Predicted 10-Year Risk by the ATP-III Risk Prediction Model efigure 4. Observed 10-Year Risks of Atherosclerotic CVD Mortality by Deciles of Predicted 10-Year Risk by the SCORE Risk Equation This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. 1

eappendix. Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Medication Use and Main Outcome Measures Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Medication Use Information on medication use and smoking behavior was collected by trained interviewers using a computerized home interview. Anthropometric measures were obtained during the visit at the research center. Blood pressure was measured at the right brachial artery with a random-zero sphygmomanometer with the participant in sitting position, and the mean of 2 consecutive measurements was used. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure 140 or diastolic blood pressure 90 or use of antihypertensive medication. Serum glucose and serum total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were measured with standard laboratory techniques. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed on the basis of a fasting plasma glucose level of 7.0 mmol/l ( 126 mg/dl), or non-fasting plasma glucose levels of 11.1 mmol/l ( 200 mg/dl) in a small group of participants, or use of blood glucose lowering medication. Serum creatinine levels were measured by using an enzymatic assay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), which was calibrated by isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Because creatinine measurements can vary across laboratories, we first calibrated our measures. For this purpose, mean creatinine values from the Rotterdam Study, by sex-specific age groups (< 60, 60 to 69, and 70 years), were aligned with the corresponding corrected means from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-III) participants, as described previously. 1 The NHANES-III creatinine measures were calibrated to the Cleveland Clinic Laboratory, requiring a correction factor of 0.23 mg/dl (20.3 µmol/l). 2 The glomerular filtration rate was estimated by the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease equation 3 as recommended by the National Kidney Foundation. 4 Estimated glomerular filtration rate (in ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ) = 186 x [serum creatinine (in mg/dl) -1.154 x age - 0.203 x 0.742 (if female)]. 5 Chronic kidney disease was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2. Family history of myocardial infarction was defined as a self-reported history of myocardial infarction occurring before the age of 65 in first degree family members. Data on dispensing of statins during followup were obtained from all seven, fully computerized, pharmacies in the Ommoord district. We used the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes C10AA and C10B for statins. Main Outcome Measures The main outcome measures under study were incident hard atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), hard coronary heart disease (CHD), and atherosclerotic CVD mortality. ASCVD composed of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), CHD mortality, and stroke. Incident CHD was defined as the occurrence of a non-fatal or fatal MI, or death due to CHD. 6 Strokes were diagnosed when a patient had typical neurological symptoms and a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, made within 4 weeks after the occurrence of stroke, confirmed the diagnosis. 7 Atherosclerotic CVD mortality was defined as death due to CHD, cerebrovascular disease, or other atherosclerotic disease (including abdominal aortic aneurysms, peripheral vascular disease, and visceral vascular disease). 6 Only first-incident events were included in the analyses. The information on study outcomes was gathered from general practitioners and from letters and discharge reports from medical specialists. Events were adjudicated by study physicians as described previously. 6, 7 Total number of events for each outcome and number of individuals who were lost to follow-up are presented in etables 4-6. The overall Clark s C of completeness of follow-up was calculated for each particular outcome (etables 4-6). 8 ereferences 1. Köttgen A, Glazer NL, Dehghan A, et al. Multiple loci associated with indices of renal function and chronic kidney disease. Nat Genet. 2009;41(6):712-717. 2. Fox CS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Culleton B, Wilson PWF, Levy D. Predictors of new-onset kidney disease in a community-based population. JAMA. 2004;291(7):844-50. 3. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(6):461-70. 2

4. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, et al; National Kidney Foundation. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(2):137-147. 5. Coresh J, Astor BC, McQuillan G, et al. Calibration and random variation of the serum creatinine assay as critical elements of using equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39(5):920-929. 6. Leening MJG, Kavousi M, Heeringa J, et al. Methods of data collection and definitions of cardiac outcomes in the Rotterdam Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(3):173-185. 7. Wieberdink RG, Ikram MA, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MMB. Trends in stroke incidence rates and stroke risk factors in Rotterdam, the Netherlands from 1990 to 2008. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(4):287-295. 8. Clark TG, Altman DG, De Stavola BL. Quantification of the completeness of follow-up. Lancet. 2002;359(9314):1309-1310. 9. Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013. 10. Goff DC, Jr., Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013. 11. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285(19):2486-2497. 12. http://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/risk-functions/coronary-heart-disease/hard-10-year-risk.php. 13. European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, Reiner Z, Catapano AL, et al. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(14):1769-1818. 14. Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(11):987-1003. 3

etable 1. Treatment Recommendations Based on the ACC/AHA Guidelines 9 Men (N=1,894) a Clinical CVD b 256 (13.5%) LDL-C>190 mg/dl (4.9 mmol/l) 125 (6.6%) Diabetes mellitus 206 (10.9%) 10-year ASCVD risk >7.5% c 1238 (65.4%) 10-year ASCVD risk: 5%-7.5% c 63 (3.3%) 10-year ASCVD risk <5% c 6 (0.3%) Women (N=2,315) c Clinical CVD b 141 (6.1%) LDL-C>190 mg/dl (4.9 mmol/l) 254 (11.0%) Diabetes mellitus 217 (9.4%) 10-year ASCVD risk >7.5% c 911 (39.3%) 10-year ASCVD risk: 5%-7.5% c 330 (14.2%) 10-year ASCVD risk <5% c 462 (20.0%) Abbreviations: ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein Cholesterol; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Values are numbers (percentages of total population) in each treatment category. Red, yellow, and green colors denote the treatment recommended, treatment considered, and no treatment categories respectively. a Individuals on statin treatment at baseline (N=315 for men and N=330 for women) are excluded. b Clinical CVD includes a history of myocardial infarction, coronary or other arterial revascularization, stroke or focal transient ischemic attack, and heart failure. c 10-year risk for hard atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, calculated using the Pooled Cohort Equations. 10 4

etable 2. Treatment Recommendations Based on the ATP-III Guidelines 11 Hard CHD risk (%) a Men (N=1,894) b 0-1 risk factors c (10-year CHD risk <10%) 2+ risk factors c (10-year CHD risk <10%) 2+ risk factors c (10-year CHD risk: 10%-20%) CHD or CHD risk equivalents d (10 year CHD risk >20%) Women (N=2,315) b 0-1 risk factors c (10-year CHD risk <10%) 2+ risk factors c (10-year CHD risk <10%) 2+ risk factors c (10-year CHD risk: 10%-20%) CHD or CHD risk equivalents d (10 year CHD risk >20%) <100 mg/dl <2.5 mmol/l 100-130 mg/dl 2.5-3.4 mmol/l LDL-C levels 130-160 mg/dl 3.4-4.1 mmol/l 160-190 mg/dl 4.1-4.9 mmol/l >190 mg/dl >4.9 mmol/l 36 (1.9%) 133 (7.0%) 160 (8.5%) 92 (4.9%) 36 (1.9%) 14 (0.7%) 24 (1.3%) 15 (0.8%) 2 (0.1%) 1 (0.1%) 35 (1.8%) 155 (8.2%) 226 (11.9%) 137 (7.2%) 41 (2.2%) 68 (3.6%) 177 (9.3%) 278 (14.7%) 194 (10.2%) 70 (3.7%) 77 (3.3%) 228 (9.8%) 358 (15.5%) 249 (10.8%) 109 (4.7%) 36 (1.6%) 147 (6.3%) 274 (11.8%) 205 (8.9%) 100 (4.3%) 6 (0.3%) 20 (0.9%) 51 (2.2%) 56 (2.4%) 62 (2.7%) 22 (0.9%) 77 (3.3%) 148 (6.4%) 78 (3.4%) 12 (0.5%) Abbreviations: ATP-III, Adult Treatment Panel-III; CHD, Coronary Heart Disease; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Values are numbers (percentages of total population) in each treatment category. Red, yellow, and green colors denote the treatment recommended, treatment considered, and no treatment categories respectively. a 10-year risk for hard CHD was calculated using the ATP-III risk prediction model. 12 b Individuals on statin treatment at baseline (N=315 for men and N=330 for women) are excluded. c Risk factors include: smoking, hypertension, low HDL levels (<40 mg/dl), family history of CHD, and age (men 45, women 55) d CHD risk equivalent includes persons with clinical cardiovascular disease or diabetes at baseline. 5

etable 3. Treatment Recommendations Based on the ESC Guidelines 13 Total CVD LDL-C levels mortality risk (%) a <70 mg/dl <1.8 mmol/l 70-100 mg/dl 1.8-2.5 mmol/l 100-155 mg/dl 2.5-4.0 mmol/l 155-190 mg/dl 4.0-4.9 mmol/l >190 mg/dl >4.9 mmol/l Men (N=1,894) b < 1% c 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1% - 5% d 5 (0.3%) 38 (2.0%) 371 (19.6%) 152 (8.0%) 36 (1.9%) 5% - 10% e 4 (0.2%) 24 (1.3%) 279 (14.7%) 171 (9.0%) 53 (2.8%) >= 10% f 11 (0.6%) 45 (2.4%) 426 (22.5%) 214 (11.3%) 65 (3.4%) Women (N=2,315) b < 1% c 3 (0.1%) 18 (0.8%) 105 (4.5%) 43 (1.9%) 5 (0.2%) 1% - 5% d 6 (0.3%) 45 (1.9%) 613 (26.5%) 396 (17.1%) 154 (6.7%) 5% - 10% e 2 (0.1%) 9 (0.4%) 151 (6.5%) 114 (4.9%) 58 (2.5%) >= 10% f 10 (0.4%) 24 (1.1%) 303 (13.1%) 179 (7.7%) 77 (3.3%) Abbreviations: ESC, European Society of Cardiology; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Values are numbers (percentages of total population) in each treatment category. Red, yellow, and green colors denote the treatment recommended, treatment considered, and no treatment categories respectively. a 10-year risk for cardiovascular mortality using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) equation. 14 b Individuals on statin treatment at baseline (N=315 for men and N=330 for women) are excluded. c Low risk: a calculated SCORE of <1% for 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease. d Moderate risk: a calculated SCORE of 1%-5% for 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease. e High risk: a calculated SCORE of 5%-10% for 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease. f Very high risk: presence of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease at baseline, or a calculated SCORE of >10% for 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease. 6

etable 4. Characteristics of the Study Population for Hard ASCVD Risk Estimation a Characteristic Value b Men (N=1,513) Women (N=1,920) Age (years) 65.1 (5.2) 65.2 (5.3) Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 143 (21) 140 (21) Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 80 (11) 77 (11) Antihypertensive treatment at baseline (N, %) c 267 (17.6) 403 (21.0) Antihypertensive treatment during follow-up (N, %) d 504 (33.3) 624 (32.5) Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 26.6 (3.3) 27.3 (4.5) Total cholesterol (mg/dl) Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 215.4 (31.3) 5.58 (0.81) 228.2 (29.3) 5.91 (0.76) HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 48.3 (12.4) 1.25 (0.32) 59.5 (15.4) 1.54 (0.40) LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 139.4 (28.2) 3.61 (0.73) 143.6 (27.4) 3.72 (0.71) Statin initiation during follow-up (N, %) f 263 (17.4) 311 (16.2) Current smoking (N, %) 304 (20.1) 361 (18.8) Clark s C of completeness of 10-year follow-up 8 96.9% 97.0% Lost to follow-up during 10-year follow-up (N, %) 9 (0.6) 9 (0.5) ASCVD events during 10-year follow-up (N, %) 192 (12.7) 151 (7.9) Abbreviations: ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein. a Individuals on statin treatment at baseline, persons with prevalent cardiovascular disease, and those with low density cholesterol levels >190 mg/dl are excluded from risk assessment. b Values are mean (SD) or numbers (percentages). c Numbers (percentage) of men and women on hypertension treatment at baseline. d Numbers (percentage) of men and women who were not receiving antihypertensive medication at baseline and were prescribed antihypertensive over the course of follow-up. e Numbers (percentage) of men and women on lipid lowering medication at baseline. (Statins constituted 96% of all lipid lowering medications at baseline) f Numbers (percentage) of men and women who were not receiving lipid lowering medication at baseline and were prescribed statins over the course of follow-up. 7

etable 5. Characteristics of the Study Population for Hard CHD Risk Estimation a Characteristic Value b Men (N=1,431) Women (N=1,976) Age (years) 64.9 (5.2) 65.1 (5.2) Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 142 (21) 139 (20) Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 80 (11) 76 (10) Antihypertensive treatment at baseline (N, %) c 227 (15.9) 373 (18.9) Antihypertensive treatment during follow-up (N, %) d 474 (33.1) 658 (33.3) Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 26.5 (3.2) 26.9 (4.3) Total cholesterol (mg/dl) Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 222.4 (35.9) 5.76 (0.93) 236.7 (35.9) 6.13 (0.93) HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 49.0 (12.4) 1.27 (0.32) 59.8 (15.1) 1.55 (0.39) LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 145.9 (32.8) 3.78 (0.85) 152.1 (34.7) 3.94 (0.90) Statin initiation during follow-up (N, %) f 265 (18.5) 373 (18.9) Current smoking (N, %) 288 (20.1) 381 (19.3) Clark s C of completeness of 10-year follow-up 8 96.8% 96.9% Lost to follow-up during 10-year follow-up (N, %) 10 (0.7) 13 (0.7) Hard CHD events during 10-year follow-up (N, %) 98 (6.8) 62 (3.1) Abbreviations: CHD, coronary heart disease; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein. a Individuals on statin treatment at baseline and persons with prevalent cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus are excluded from risk assessment. b Values are mean (SD) or numbers (percentages). c Numbers (percentage) of men and women on hypertension treatment at baseline. d Numbers (percentage) of men and women who were not receiving antihypertensive medication at baseline and were prescribed antihypertensive over the course of follow-up. e Numbers (percentage) of men and women on lipid lowering medication at baseline. (Statins constituted 96% of all lipid lowering medications at baseline) f Numbers (percentage) of men and women who were not receiving lipid lowering medication at baseline and were prescribed statins over the course of follow-up. 8

etable 6. Characteristics of the Study Population for CVD Mortality Risk Estimation a Characteristic Value b Men (N=1,366) Women (N=1,816) Age (years) 64.7 (5.1) 66.7 (5.0) Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 141 (21) 138 (20) Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 80 (11) 76 (10) Antihypertensive treatment at baseline (N, %) c 210 (15.4) 328 (18.1) Antihypertensive treatment during follow-up (N, %) d 488 (35.7) 627 (35) Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 26.5 (3.2)4.5 26.8 (4.2) Total cholesterol (mg/dl) Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 222.0 (35.9) 5.75 (0.93) 236.3 (35.5) 6.12 (0.92) HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 48.6 (12.0) 1.26 (0.31) 59.8 (15.1) 1.55 (0.39) LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 145.9 (33.2) 3.78 (0.86) 151.7 (34.4) 3.93 (0.89) Statin initiation during follow-up (N, %) f 298 (21.8) 373 (20.5%) Current smoking (N, %) 277 (20.3) 356 (19.6) Clark s C of completeness of 10-year follow-up 8 99.6% 99.7% Lost to follow-up during 10-year follow-up (N, %) 10 (0.7) 8 (0.4) CVD deaths during 10-year follow-up (N, %) 50 (3.7) 37 (2.0) Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular disease; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein. a Individuals on statin treatment at baseline and persons with prevalent cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, or chronic kidney disease are excluded from risk assessment. b Values are mean (SD) or numbers (percentages). c Numbers (percentage) of men and women on hypertension treatment at baseline. d Numbers (percentage) of men and women who were not receiving antihypertensive medication at baseline and were prescribed antihypertensive over the course of follow-up. e Numbers (percentage) of men and women on lipid lowering medication at baseline. (Statins constituted 96% of all lipid lowering medications at baseline) f Numbers (percentage) of men and women who were not receiving lipid lowering medication at baseline and were prescribed statins over the course of follow-up. 9

etable 7. Population at Different Risk Categories Based on the Three Risk Prediction Models Risk categories Men Women N (%) N (%) Pooled Cohort Equation (ACC/AHA guideline) a 10-year ASCVD risk <5% 6 (0.4%) 466 (24.3%) 10-year ASCVD risk: 5%-7.5% 63 (4.2%) 342 (17.8%) 10-year ASCVD risk: 7.5%-10% 109 (7.2%) 269 (14.0%) 10-year ASCVD risk >10% 1335 (88.2%) 843 (43.9%) Total N 1,513 1,920 ATP-III Risk Prediction Tool (ATP-III guideline) b 10-year hard CHD risk <10% 203 (14.2%) 1,758 (89.0%) 10-year hard CHD risk: 10%-20% 892 (62.3%) 200 (10.1%) 10-year hard CHD risk >20% 336 (23.5%) 18 (0.9%) Total N 1,431 1,976 SCORE Project Equation (ESC guideline) c 10-year CVD mortality risk < 1% 0 (0.0%) 174 (9.6%) 10-year CVD mortality risk: 1%-5% 602 (44.1%) 1,214 (66.9%) 10-year CVD mortality risk: 5%-10% 531 (38.9%) 333 (18.3%) 10-year CVD mortality risk >= 10% 233 (17.0%) 95 (5.2%) Total N 1,366 1,816 Abbreviations: ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; ATP-III, Adult Treatment Panel III; CHD, coronary heart disease; SCORE, Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; CVD, cardiovascular disease. Values are numbers (percentages of total population) in each risk category. a Risk categories are based on the Pooled Cohort Equation, 10 which underlies the ACC/AHA guideline. 9 b Risk categories are based on the ATP-III risk calculator, 12 which underlies the ATP-III guideline. 11 c Risk categories are based on the SCORE Project, 14 which underlies the ESC guideline. 13 10

efigure 1. Treatment Recommendations for Rotterdam Study Participants 55-65 Years Old (N=2069) and 65-75 Years Old (N=2140), Based on the 2013 ACC/AHA, 2001 ATP-III, and 2012 ESC Guidelines A. Treatment recommendations for Rotterdam Study participants 55-65 years old (N=2069) a, based on the 2013 ACC/AHA, 2001 ATP-III, and 2012 ESC guidelines Abbreviations: ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; ATP-III, Adult Treatment Panel-III; ESC, European Society of Cardiology. Percentage of the population in different categories of treatment recommendations based on the 2013 ACC/AHA, 9 2001 ATP-III, 11 and the 2012 ESC guidelines. 13 a Individuals receiving statin treatment at baseline (n=133 men and n=141 women) were excluded. (continued on next page) 11

efigure 1. Treatment Recommendations for Rotterdam Study Participants 55-65 Years Old (N=2069) and 65-75 Years Old (N=2140), Based on the 2013 ACC/AHA, 2001 ATP-III, and 2012 ESC Guidelines (continued) B. Treatment recommendations for Rotterdam Study participants 65-75 years old (N=2140) a, based on the 2013 ACC/AHA, 2001 ATP-III, and 2012 ESC guidelines Abbreviations: ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; ATP-III, Adult Treatment Panel-III; ESC, European Society of Cardiology. Percentage of the population in different categories of treatment recommendations based on the 2013 ACC/AHA, 9 2001 ATP-III, 11 and the 2012 ESC guidelines. 13 a Individuals receiving statin treatment at baseline (n=182 men and n=189 women) were excluded. 12

efigure 2. Observed 10-Year Risks of Hard ASCVD by Deciles of Predicted 10-Year Risk by the 2013 ACC/AHA Risk Prediction Model Abbreviations: ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Each point corresponds to the [predicted risk (95% CI); observed risk (95% CI)] for each decile as follows: For Men: [7.6 (7.3-7.8); 3.9 (1.5-8.4)], [10.8 (10.7-10.9); 7.3 (3.7-12.7)], [12.9 (12.8, 13.0); 5.3 (2.3-10.2)], [15.0 (14.9-15.1); 6.6 (3.2-11.8)], [17.6 (17.5-17.7); 13.8 (8.8-20.3)], [20.2 (20.1-20.3); 13.2 (8.3-19.7)], [23.0 (22.8-23.1); 11.2 (6.7-17.3)], [27.0 (26.8-27.3); 17.2 (11.6-24.2)], [33.0 (32.7-33.3); 26.0 (19.2-33.8)], [48.2 (46.8-49.6); 22.4 (16.2-29.8)]. For women: [2.4 (2.3-2.5); 1.0 (0.1-3.7)], [3.8 (3.8-3.9); 3.1 (1.2-6.7)], [5.1 (5.1, 5.2); 5.7 (2.9-10.0)], [6.4 (6.4-6.5); 3.1 (1.2-6.7)], [8.0 (7.9-8.1); 8.3 (4.8-13.2)], [9.9 (9.9-10.0); 4.2 (1.08-8.0)], [12.2 (12.1-12.3); 13.5 (9.0-19.2)], [15.3 (15.1-15.4); 12.0 (7.7-17.4)], [19.8 (19.5-20.1); 8.3 (4.8-13.2)], [33.8 (31.8-33.9.); 19.3 (13.9-25.6)]. 13

efigure 3. Observed 10-year Risks of Hard CHD by Deciles of Predicted 10-Year Risk by the ATP-III Risk Prediction Model Abbreviations: CHD, Coronary heart disease; ATP-III, Adult treatment panel-iii. Each point corresponds to the [predicted risk (95% CI); observed risk (95% CI)] for each decile as follows: For men: [7.7 (7.5-7.9); 1.4 (0.2-4.9)], [10.1 (10.0-10.2); 2.8 (0.8-7.0)], [11.7 (11.6-11.8); 2.8 (0.8-7.0)], [13.0 (12.9-13.1); 4.2 (1.6-9.0)], [14.4 (14.3-14.5); 8.4 (4.4-14.2)], [15.8 (15.8-15.9); 7.0 (3.4-12.5)], [17.5 (17.4-17.6); 10.4 (5.9-16.6)], [19.6 (19.5-19.7); 4.2 (1.6-8.9)], [22.4 (22.2-22.6); 12.6 (7.6-19.2)], [29.1 (28.3-29.8); 14.7 (9.3-21.6)]. For women: [1.2 (1.1-1.2); 0.5 (0.01-2.8)], [2.0 (1.9-2.0); 0.5 (0.01-2.8)], [2.6 (2.6-2.6); 1.0 (0.1-3.6)], [3.2 (3.2-3.3); 3.5 (1.4-7.1)], [3.9 (3.9-3.9); 3.0 (1.1-6.5)], [4.7 (4.6-4.7); 2.5 (0.8-5.8)], [5.6 (5.6-5.7); 3.5 (1.4-7.1)], [7.0 (7.0-7.0); 3.6 (1.4-7.2)], [8.9 (8.8-9.0); 4.0 (1.8-7.8)], [14.5 (13.9-15.1); 9.1 (5.5-14.1)]. 14

efigure 4. Observed 10-Year Risks of Atherosclerotic CVD Mortality by Deciles of Predicted 10-Year Risk by the SCORE Risk Equation Abbreviations: CVD, Cardiovascular disease; SCORE, Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation equation. Each point corresponds to the [predicted risk (95% CI); observed risk (95% CI)] for each decile as follows: For men: [1.9 (1.8-2.0); 0.7 (0.02-4.0)], [2.8 (2.8-2.9); 0.7 (0.02-4.0)], [3.5 (3.5-3.6); 0.7 (0.02-4.0)], [4.2 (4.2-4.3); 0.7 (0.02-4.0)], [5.1 (5.0-5.1); 1.5 (0.2-5.2)], [5.9 (5.8-5.9); 2.2 (0.5-6.3)], [7.0 (6.9-7.0); 4.4 (1.6-9.4)], [8.4 (8.3-8.5); 5.9 (2.6-11.3)], [10.7 (10.5-10.9); 10.1 (5.7-16.4)], [18.5 (17.2-19.7); 9.6 (5.2-15.8)]. For women: [0.8 (0.8-0.9); 0.0 (0.0-0.0)], [1.2 (1.2-1.3); 0.0 (0.0-0.0)], [1.7 (1.6-1.7); 0.0 (0.0-0.0)], [2.1 (2.1-2.1); 1.1 (0.1-3.9)], [2.6 (2.5-2.6); 1.1 (0.1-3.9)], [3.1 (3.1-3.2); 2.2 (0.6-5.5)], [3.8 (3.8-3.9); 2.7 (0.9-6.3)], [4.8 (4.8-4.9); 3.3 (1.2-7.1)], [6.4 (6.4-6.5); 4.4 (1.9-8.4)], [11.7 (11.0-12.3); 5.5 (2.7-9.9)]. 15