Effective Communication in the Courts

Similar documents
A qualified interpreter is one who, via an onsite appearance or a video remote interpreting service (VRI), can:

In this chapter, you will learn about the requirements of Title II of the ADA for effective communication. Questions answered include:

Mechanicsburg, Ohio. Policy: Ensuring Effective Communication for Individuals with Disabilities Policy Section: Inmate Supervision and Care

a. Police departments and other law enforcement entities, including parole and probation offices are covered under this definition of public entity.

b. Entities that lease or rent space for their events but have no permanent public office or facility must also follow Title III of the ADA.

Effective Communication

EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION: HEALTHCARE

Information, Guidance and Training on the Americans with Disabilities Act

ADA Business BRIEF: Communicating with People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing in Hospital Settings

Communications with Persons with Disabilities

Important ADA Policy Guidance on Effective Communication

Illinois Supreme Court. Language Access Policy

This is What Effective Communication Looks Like in Andrew S. Phillips National Association of the Deaf September 14, 2012

Effective Communication: The ADA and Law Enforcement

Effective Communication: The ADA and Law Enforcement

EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION IN MEDICAL SETTINGS

1) Title III of the ADA applies to all private health care providers. See 42 U.S.C (7)(F).

Volume of Colorado Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (12 CCR )

To Whom it May Concern:

Auxiliary Aids Plan Okaloosa County Sheriff s Office And Domestic Violence Programs

Civil Rights Compliance for Patients

Effective Communications with Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Model Policy

Dade Legal Aid Auxiliary Aids Plan

The Salvation Army Brevard County Domestic Violence Program Auxiliary Aids & Services Plan

Hearing Impaired/Disabled Communications

Auxiliary Aids Plan Orlando Police Department InVEST/STOP Program

29 th Judicial District Language Access Plan

Providing Equally Effective Communication

Circuit Court of Buffalo County Language Access Plan

Appendix 11 GUIDELINES FOR TRIALS INVOLVING DEAF JURORS WHO SERVE WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS

Pasco Sheriff s Office Plan for. Auxiliary Aids and Services

Virginia Beach Police Department General Order Chapter 11 Patrol Operations

5/6/2016. Interpreters, Translators, and Auxiliary Aids: Provider Obligations. Important Information. Preliminaries

Position Statement on VRI Services in Hospitals

Hearing Impaired/Disabled Communications

Safety Shelter of St. Johns County, Inc Auxiliary Aids Plan

POLICY and PROCEDURE

Departmental ADA Coordinators Academy. Session II A April 5, 2016 Effective Communication: The Basics

2013 AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICE PLAN FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES AND PERSONS WITH LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY

Subject COMMUNICATING WITH INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING. 1 July By Order of the Police Commissioner

participating in a court proceeding, cannot be guaranteed due process of law or

AUXILIARY AIDS PLAN FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES AND LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY

Next Generation Systems: Impact on the Deaf Community. Focus Group with NTID Community

Auxiliary Aids Plan for Persons with Disabilities and Limited English Proficiency 2015

Jewish Family & Children s Service of the Suncoast, Inc. APPROVED BY: BOARD December 19, 2013 SUPERCEDES: n/a REVISED: n/a PAGE(S): 4

Limited English Proficiency Services

Auxiliary Aids Plan. Auxiliary Aids Plan Rev: 2/1/2016 Page 1

48th Judicial District LANGUAGE ACCESS PLAN

The Canadian Hearing Society gratefully acknowledges The Law Foundation of Ontario for its financial support of this project.

INTERPRETATION SERVICES, COMMUNICATION ASSISTANCE AND ACCOMMODATIONS AVAILABLE FOR PATIENTS AND VISITORS WITH DISABLITIES

H 5830 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

RIGHTS OF DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING PEOPLE IN ENTERTAINMENT

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Movie Captioning and Video Description

Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas 31st Judicial District Language Access Plan

OBLIGATIONS OF AIRPORTS TO PROVIDE COMMUNICATION ACCESSIBILITY TO DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING PERSONS

ALL DEAF.COM. Lawyer Settles Interpreter Case. April 9, 2004

Auxiliary Aid Service Provision and Network Monitoring Plan

9/9/2016. Steven E. Gordon Assistant United States Attorney Civil Rights Enforcement Coordinator USAO Eastern District of Virginia 1

Planning and Hosting Accessible Webinars

Glossary of Inclusion Terminology

C I T Y O F O A K L A N D A D A P R O G R A M S D I V I S I O N

Major Changes to the ACA How Will They Affect Your Language Access Program? Sponsored by InDemand Interpreting

A Guide for Effective Communication in Healthcare Patients

Parent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement

Americans with Disabilities Act And the Hearing Impaired

Thurston County Superior Court 2016

NOPD CONSENT DECREE MONITOR NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA

CHHA-NL Position Paper. Improve Accessibility of the Justice System for Persons with Hearing Loss

Language Assistance Plan

How to Ask for a Reasonable Accommodation of Your Disability from the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH)

SPECIAL DISCLAIMER FOR INTERPRETING SERVICES INVOLVING CALLS TO EMERGENCY SERVICE PROVIDERS (911/E911), OR LEGAL, MEDICAL OR MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES

Accessibility. Reporting Interpretation and Accommodation Requests

Disability Accommodations at Stadiums and Arenas for Patrons with Vision and Hearing Impairments

CIRCUIT COURT OF DUNN COUNTY LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE PLAN NARRATIVE

Language Assistance to Persons with Limited English Proficiency and Persons with Hearing and Visual Impairment PURPOSE:

Self-Evaluation for Compliance with Section 504 Accessibility Requirements for Persons with Disabilities

Standards for Delivering Interpreting Services in the New Jersey Judiciary

Assistive Technology for Regular Curriculum for Hearing Impaired

POLICY GUIDELINES. Notice of the Right to Effective Communication, and Determination as to Effectiveness of Communication

Section 4. Auxiliary Aids and Services: Common Challenges. Irene Bowen

Interpreter and Translation Services/Hearing Devices (Language Access Plan for Limited English Proficiency Persons)

tation DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAMS BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE EFFECTIVE DATE: April 8, 2014 BY:

Partnering With The Deaf Community 2016 Travis County ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

SECTION 504 NOTICE OF PARENT/STUDENT RIGHTS IN IDENTIFICATION/EVALUATION, AND PLACEMENT

Section Telecommunications Products Toll-Free Service (TFS) Detail Voluntary Product Accessibility Template

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

Removing Barriers to Justice: It s s More Than Ramps. Office of State Courts Administrator, Access to Justice

POLICY: EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION WITH INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING

TUCSON CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COURT

AWARENESS INTERACTION TRAINING

Language Assistance Plan (LAP) for Puyallup Municipal Court

Interpreter Services. How to Effectively Work with Interpreters and Translators to Communicate with Your Patients. UWMC Interpreter Services 1

Date: April 19, 2017 Name of Product: Cisco Spark Board Contact for more information:

NO , Chapter 1 TALLAHASSEE, September 18, Personnel

2019 New Superior Court Judges SOG 1/2/2019

I. Language and Communication Needs

AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES PLAN FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

Language Services Program

Lessons Learned: Enhancing Communication between Emergency Responders and Entities Serving People

POLICY ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR STUDENTS CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY

Transcription:

Effective Communication in the Courts Michael Richardson, MPA June 25, 2013 1

Technical Assistance Training Material Dissemination Research Public Awareness 2

Objectives Have a basic understanding of effective communication for people with disabilities Understand the importance of effective communication in state and local courts Broaden knowledge of various auxiliary aids and services Development of an action plan for providing effective communication support. 3

The ADA in Brief The right to effective communication between state and local government entities and people with disabilities is based on a federal law, Part A of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 4

Who is Protected? Individuals who have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; Individuals who have a record of a physical or mental impairment that substantially limited one or more of the individual s major life activities; and Individuals who are regarded as having such an impairment, whether they have the impairment or not. 5

Who is Covered? The ADA protects individuals with a disabilities who participate in court activities, including litigants, witnesses, jurors, spectators, traffic violators, conservators, victims, and attorneys. The law applies to any type of court proceeding, including civil, criminal, traffic, small claims, domestic relations, probate, bankruptcy, juvenile, and other specialized courts. 6

Who is Covered? Other activities may include: Interactions with court personnel Educational activities Marriage ceremonies performed by court personnel 7

Title II Accommodation Requirements To provide access to qualified individuals with disabilities, state/local courts are required to: Make reasonable modifications to policies and practices, Remove architectural, communication or transportation barriers, and Provide auxiliary aids and services. 8

What is Effective Communication? Communication occurs in many ways: Speaking, listening, reading and writing are all common ways of communicating. A public entity shall take appropriate steps to ensure that communications with applicants, participants, and members of the public with disabilities are as effective as communications with others. 28 C.F.R. 35.160(a) 9

Why is Effective Communication Important? Communication is key to full participation in court services. There may be serious consequences resulting from the lack of communication access for people with disabilities in the court system. 10

Common Scenarios Cuevas v. City of Hialeah, Florida A deaf couple alleged that the police failed to provide qualified interpreters and involuntarily committed the wife to a hospital on two separate occasions because she was deaf. This matter was resolved. * *National Association of the Deaf 11

Common Scenarios A deaf woman, in danger of physical violence from her ex-boyfriend, went to her local courthouse seeking an Order of Protection. When the courthouse did not provide her with an interpreter, she was unable to participate in the hearing. As a result, she did not get crucial legal protection against her abuser. * * National Association of the Deaf 12

Common Scenarios A late-deafened father told the judge he could not hear or understand the proceedings in which he sought custody of his children. When the judge instructed the man to wear his hearing aids, he explained that they were not particularly helpful. The judge held the man in contempt of court and sent him to jail for a few days.* * National Association of the Deaf 13

Common Scenarios A hard-of-hearing grandmother petitioned to become an intervenor in her grandson s custody hearing. The court refused to provide her with computer assisted real-time transcription (CART) because she was not a party to the case. Without CART services, she was unable to understand or participate in the proceedings and the grandchild was placed in state custody. * * National Association of the Deaf 14

Auxiliary Aids and Services Under the ADA and its regulations, state and local courts are required to provide auxiliary aids and services to ensure effective communication with people with disabilities during civil and criminal proceedings. 28 C.F.R. 35.160(b)(1) 15

Auxiliary Aids and Services The provision of auxiliary aids and services also applies to all members of the public who seek participation in a court s programs, services, and activities, including parties to legal proceedings and their companions, witnesses, jurors, and spectators. 16

Determining What Accommodation is Appropriate In determining what type of auxiliary aid and service is necessary, courts shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with disabilities. 28 C.F.R. 35.160(2) Unless the court can demonstrate that an equally effective alternative is available, given the nature, circumstances, length, complexity, and importance of the communication process. 17

Requesting Documentation of Need for an Accommodation Generally, not necessary or appropriate. If it is not apparent how the requested accommodation relates to an individual s disability, it is acceptable for the court to require documentation from a qualified health care provider in order to fully and fairly evaluate the accommodations request. 18

Can a Court Charge for Auxiliary Aids or Services? Litigants, attorneys, defendants, spectators, or any other persons with disabilities involved in the proceedings, cannot be charged for the auxiliary aid or service provided by a state or local court. See 28 C.F.R. 35.130(f). Some states still have laws that permit judges to assess the cost of auxiliary aids or services, such as qualified interpreter services, as court costs. These state laws violate the ADA and its intent. 19

Undue Burden The ADA does not require courts to take any action that would impose an undue financial or administrative burden. The decision about whether the accommodation request imposes an undue burden on the court should be made by a presiding judge or his/her designee. 20

Auxiliary Aids and Services for Individuals who are Deaf of Hard of Hearing qualified interpreters note-takers computer-aided transcription services written materials assistive listening systems closed caption decoders, open and closed captioning TTYs/TDDs, telephone relay service, or video relay service real-time transcription exchange of written notes. 21

Auxiliary aids and services for individuals who are blind or visually impaired adjustable lighting, or a location with better lighting taped text qualified readers (individuals or electronic readers) assistance in filling out forms materials in Braille large print materials materials in electronic format on compact discs or in e-mails audio recordings 22

Auxiliary aids and services for individuals with speech impairments speech synthesizers* communication boards* sign language interpreting access to laptop computer/keyboard for typed communication *Speech synthesizers and communication boards are personal devices. Courts are not required to furnish such devices, but should allow individuals to bring in their own for effective communication purposes. 23

2010 Revisions to Effective Communication Requirements Qualified reader: new definition. Qualified interpreter: revised definition. Companions with disabilities. Types of auxiliary aids and services that are necessary to ensure effective communication. Use of individuals or children as interpreters. Performance standards for video remote interpreting services. 24

Deafness For individuals who are deaf and use sign language, the most effective auxiliary aid or service which a court can provide is usually the service of qualified sign language interpreters, who are trained in legal procedure and terminology. 25

Qualified Sign Language Interpreter An interpreter who, via a video remote interpreting (VRI) service or an on-site appearance, is able to interpret effectively, accurately, and impartially, both receptively and expressively, using any necessary specialized vocabulary... includes sign language interpreters, oral transliterators and cued-language transliterators. 28 C.F.R. 35.104 26

Qualified Sign Language Interpreter The ADA definition does require certification. State laws and regulations may impose additional requirements for interpreters. The law that offers greater coverage and protection for people with disabilities applies. 27

Qualified Sign Language Interpreter Recommendation: Interpreters working in court settings should have some form of national certification in addition to formal legal interpreter training. Such certification and training serves as an indication of competence. 28

Family Members as Interpreters? No!! Family members do not meet the requirements of a qualified interpreter because they usually cannot remain impartial, and often do not have the language skills, interpreter, or legal training to effectively and accurately interpret a court proceeding. 29

Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) Definition: An interpreting service that uses video conferencing technology over dedicated lines or wireless technology offering high-speed, wide bandwidth video connection that delivers high quality video images... 30

Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) 31

Communication Access Realtime Translation For individuals who are deaf but do not rely on sign language for communication and who have good levels of reading comprehension, the appropriate auxiliary aid or service is usually the use of transcription services, such as Communication Access Realtime Translation (CART). 28 C.F.R. 35.104. 32

Communication Access Realtime Translation CART converts spoken words instantly into text using a stenotype machine, computer, and special software. Real-time transcriptionists are not reporters of official record. 33

Communication Access Realtime Translation 34

Individuals who do not Sign For individuals who wear hearing aids or who have cochlear implants, the appropriate auxiliary aid might be amplified sound equipment, a courtroom with appropriate acoustic properties, and/or assistive listening systems (FM systems, etc.). 35

Telephone Communications If public phones are made available, courts must also provide teletypewriters (TTYs) or computer equipment with TTY capability to place telephone calls. For incoming calls, a TTY may not be necessary, but court employees must be instructed to accept and handle relayed calls (telephone relay and video relay) 36

Modification to Policies and Practices Creativity may be necessary to ensure effective communication. Courts are required by law to make reasonable modifications in their policies, practices and procedures, when necessary to prevent discrimination on the basis of disability. 28 C.F.R. 35.130(b)(7). 37

Modification to Policies and Practices Example: A courthouse may have only one courtroom with equipment necessary for an assistive listening device. If an individual requests such a device to observe or participate in a proceeding, the court should make efforts to move the proceeding to the accessible courtroom. 38

Other Communication Considerations A court may need to employ a screen to protect the privacy of a conversation between a deaf participant and his/her attorney during a proceeding. The screen serves to ensure that others present in the courtroom, who know ASL, do not overhear the attorney-client conversation. 39

Accommodation for Jury Service If a juror is provided with a sign language interpreter or real-time transcriptionist, these individuals must be allowed into the jury room during deliberations. The auxiliary service provider should never counsel, advise, attempt to explain terms or interject personal opinion into the jury deliberations. 40

Accommodation for Jury Service U.S. v. Dempsey, 830 F.2d 1084, 1090 (10th Cir. 1987) When utilizing auxiliary services in a proceeding, the presiding judge has the option of administering an oath of non-involvement, including language stating that the service provider will not interfere with the deliberation of the jury or reveal the confidences of the jury. Before a verdict is announced, the judge may ask the service provider and the jury if the oath was abided by. 41

Visual Impairments Where information is provided in written form, ensure effective communication for people who cannot read the text. Consider the context, the importance of the information, the length, and complexity of the materials. 42

Visual Impairments Common auxiliary aids and services: Braille large print text e-mail compact discs (CDs) with the information in accessible formats audio recordings qualified readers 43

Qualified Readers Qualified reader is defined as a person who is able to read effectively, accurately, and impartially, using any necessary specialized vocabulary. 44

Other Communication Considerations Participants who are blind may need audio-description of videos used as evidence. Photographs used as exhibits may need to be provided in descriptive text, or explained verbally by a qualified reader. Wherever possible, participants who are blind may need to access evidence by tactile means. 45

Procedures for Requesting Auxiliary Aids and Services The procedure for requesting an accommodation should be clear and made publicly available on the website, in any publications that are produced by the court, and posted in the courthouse itself. All requests should be documented and maintained in a separate file by the court s ADA Coordinator or designee. 46

Procedures for Requesting Auxiliary Aids and Services Process improvement: State and local courts should have a feedback mechanism through which people with disabilities can inform the court when an auxiliary aid or service is ineffective. 47

Attorneys A similar legal obligation to provide communication access is required of private and public attorneys inside and outside of the courtroom. For more information about the obligations of attorneys to communicate effectively with people who are deaf, visit http://www.nad.org/issues/justice 48

Resources Regulations, appendices, standards are available at DOJ s ADA web site at www.ada.gov For answers to specific questions, DOJ tollfree ADA information line: 800-514-0301 (Voice) 800-514-0383 (TTY) Network of ADA Centers (DBTACs): 800-949-4232 (Voice/TTY) U.S. Access Board web site at www.accessboard.gov. 49

Next Week Effective Communication Series Part II: Assistive Technology in the Courts Tuesday, July 9, 2013 10:00 AM 11:30 AM PST 50

Questions? 51

Contact Northwest ADA Center ADA Hotline: 800-949-4232 Email: nwadactr@uw.edu Website: www.nwadacenter.org Mail: 6912 220 th SW, Suite 105 Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 (Michael Richardson: mike67@uw.edu) 52