Selective Cardiac Myosin Activators in Heart Failure

Similar documents
A Phase 2 Study of Intravenous Omecamtiv Mecarbil, A Novel Cardiac Myosin Activator, In Patients With Acute Heart Failure

Product: Omecamtiv Mecarbil Clinical Study Report: Date: 02 April 2014 Page 1

Systolic and Diastolic Dysfunction: Four Upcoming Challenges

HF-PEF: Symptoms, quality of life and mortality/morbidity

Effects of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodeling and function:

Effects of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodeling and function:

From PARADIGM-HF to Clinical Practice. Waleed AlHabeeb, MD, MHA Associate Professor of Medicine President of the Saudi Heart Failure Group

Defined by Science Powered by Innovation Inspired by Patients

Updates in Congestive Heart Failure

Online Appendix (JACC )

Take-home Messages from Recent Heart Failure Trials: Heart Rate as a Target

Forward-Looking Statements

Aldosterone Antagonism in Heart Failure: Now for all Patients?

Mihai Gheorghiade MD

ACUTE HEART FAILURE. Julie Gorchynski MD, MSc, FACEP, FAAEM. Department of Emergency Medicine Emergency Residency Program UTHSC, San Antonio TCEP 2014

ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure

A patient with decompensated HF

Autonomic regulation therapy for heart failure

Synopsis. Study title. Investigational Product Indication Design of clinical trial. Number of trial sites Duration of clinical trial / Timetable

UPDATES IN MANAGEMENT OF HF

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

The ACC Heart Failure Guidelines

Intravenous Inotropic Support an Overview

Disclosures. Overview. Goal statement. Advances in Chronic Heart Failure Management 5/22/17

Drugs acting on the reninangiotensin-aldosterone

Protocol Identifier Subject Identifier Visit Description. [Y] Yes [N] No. [Y] Yes [N] N. If Yes, admission date and time: Day Month Year

Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE AHF): A Randomized Clinical Trial

Pioneering Precision Cardiovascular Medicine. (NASDAQ: MYOK) Corporate Presentation March 2018

Heart Failure Medications: Who Needs What Drug Now? Disclosures

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

New Agents for Heart Failure: Ivabradine Jeffrey S. Borer, MD

Heart failure hospitalizations with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

Disclosures. Advances in Chronic Heart Failure Management 6/12/2017. Van N Selby, MD UCSF Advanced Heart Failure Program June 19, 2017

HeFSSA Practitioners Program 2017 Theme The Patient Journey: Feel Good and Live Long. Case Study 2

Catheter-based mitral valve repair MitraClip System

Sacubitril/valsartan: A New Management Strategy for the Treatment of Heart Failure. Elizabeth Pogge, PharmD, MPH, BCPS, FASCP

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Heart.org/HFGuidelinesToolkit

Heart Failure Clinician Guide JANUARY 2018

Heart Failure Clinician Guide JANUARY 2016

Impact of Nicorandil on Renal Function in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Pre-Existing Renal Dysfunction

NCAP NATIONAL CARDIAC AUDIT PROGR AMME NATIONAL HEART FAILURE AUDIT 2016/17 SUMMARY REPORT

Diastolic Heart Failure Uri Elkayam, MD

Copeptin in heart failure: Associations with clinical characteristics and prognosis

ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure

Heart Failure 101 The Basic Principles of Diagnosis & Management

Diagnosis and management of Chronic Heart Failure in 2018: What does NICE say? PCCS Meeting Issues and Answers Conference Nottingham

Dobutamine Stress testing In Low Flow, Low EF, Low Gradient Aortic Stenosis Case Studies

Saudi Arabia February Pr Michel KOMAJDA. Université Pierre et Marie Curie Hospital Pitié Salpétrière

Dobutamine-induced increase in heart rate is blunted by ivabradine treatment in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure

Study Centers: This study was conducted in 2 centers in Italy.

LCZ696 A First-in-Class Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor

Heart Failure with Preserved EF (HFPEF) Epidemiology and management

Treating the patient with acute heart failure. What do we really know? Principles of acute heart failure treatment

Can point of care cardiac biomarker testing guide cardiac safety during oncology trials?

ARIC HEART FAILURE HOSPITAL RECORD ABSTRACTION FORM. General Instructions: ID NUMBER: FORM NAME: H F A DATE: 10/13/2017 VERSION: CONTACT YEAR NUMBER:

ACC.2015 FEATURED CLINICAL RESEARCH

Acute heart failure, beyond conventional treatment: persisting low output

ST2 in Heart Failure. ST2 as a Cardiovascular Biomarker. Competitive Model of ST2/IL-33 Signaling. ST2 and IL-33: Cardioprotective

Polypharmacy - arrhythmic risks in patients with heart failure

The Therapeutic Potential of Novel Approaches to RAAS. Professor of Medicine University of California, San Diego

CRT-P or CRT-D From North Alberta to Nairobi

Management of stable CAD FFR guided therapy: the new gold standard

*NOTE: When reporting C P T code and 99239, it is recommended the measure be reported each time the code is submitted for hospital discharge.

Nitrate s Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (NEAT) A Randomized Clinical Trial

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

The right heart: the Cinderella of heart failure

Study Day 1 Study Days 2 to 9 Sequence 1 Placebo for moxifloxacin Study Days 2 to 8: placebo for pazopanib (placebopaz) 800 mg;

Metoprolol Succinate SelokenZOC

β 1 Adrenergic Receptor Polymorphism-Dependent Differences

What s new in 2016 Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology? HEART FAILURE. Marc Ferrini (Lyon Fr)

Innovation therapy in Heart Failure

The Role of Ventricular Electrical Delay to Predict Left Ventricular Remodeling With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Ejection across stenotic aortic valve requires a systolic pressure gradient between the LV and aorta. This places a pressure load on the LV.

The Hearth Rate modulators. How to optimise treatment

Benefits of Combined Aerobic/Resistance/Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. The Ideal Exercise Program for CHF?

Heart Failure. Cardiac Anatomy. Functions of the Heart. Cardiac Cycle/Hemodynamics. Determinants of Cardiac Output. Cardiac Output

SCD-HeFT: The Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial

Heart Failure in Women

What Next? Management of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction What Does the Evidence Show Us?

Heart Failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Known Actions of Digoxin

The Mitral Revolution: Transcatheter Repair (and Replacement?) Going Mainstream

HFpEF, Mito or Realidad?

TransCon CNP: Preliminary Phase 1 Data. November 28, 2018

Management Strategies for Advanced Heart Failure

All in the Past? Win K. Shen, MD Mayo Clinic Arizona Controversies and Advances in CV Diseases Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, MFMER

HEART FAILURE: PHARMACOTHERAPY UPDATE

Beta-blockers in heart failure: evidence put into practice

Ejection across stenotic aortic valve requires a systolic pressure gradient between the LV and aorta. This places a pressure load on the LV.

Disclosure Information : No conflict of interest

PIONEER-HCM Cohort B Results:

Effect of Ularitide on Cardiovascular Mortality in Acute Heart Failure (TRUE-AHF)

Gerasimos Filippatos MD, FESC, FCCP, FACC

Satish K Surabhi, MD.FACC,FSCAI,RPVI Medical Director, Cardiac Cath Labs AnMed Health Heart & Vascular Care

Heart Failure Acute and Chronic

Management of acute decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Arintaya Phrommintikul Department of Medicine CMU

Effect of Abana on Ventricular Function in Ischaemic Heart Disease

Stable Angina: Indication for revascularization and best medical therapy

Transcription:

Selective Cardiac Myosin Activators in Heart Failure John McMurray Eugene Braunwald Scholar in Cardiovascular Diseases, Brigham and Women s Hospital, Boston & Visiting Professor, Harvard Medical School

Omecamtiv mecarbil (CK-1827452/AMG423): A selective cardiac myosin activator

Omecamtiv mecarbil (CK-1827452/AMG 423): A selective cardiac myosin activator

How does omecamtiv mecarbil work? The actin-myosin cycle OM increases the transition rate from weak to strong binding states Omecamtiv mecarbil increases the number of independent force generators (myosin heads) interacting with the actin filament More hands pulling on the rope Malik FI, et al. Science 2011

Omecamtiv mecarbil (CK-1827452/AMG 423): Experimental actions Malik FI, et al. Science 2011

Omecamtiv mecarbil: summary of preclinical findings Selective activator of cardiac myosin Increases duration of systole by Increasing entry rate of myosin into forceproducing state Therefore increasing overall number of active cross-bridges No increase in intracellular Ca 2+ No change in dp/dt max No increase in MVO 2

Human studies in heart failure Proof of concept study in CHF (CY1121) Ischaemic cardiomyopathy safety study (CY1221) Newly initiated study in AHF (AMG 20100754)

Study CY 1121: Objectives Primary Evaluate the safety and tolerability of CK-1827452 administered as an intravenous infusion to patients with stable heart failure Secondary Pharmacokinetics in stable heart failure Pharmacodynamics as function of dose & plasma concentration: LV function by echocardiography

Study CY 1121: Patients Inclusion Clinical diagnosis of heart failure EF < 40% (Cohort 4; EF < 30%) Sinus rhythm Stable drug regimen including ACE inhibitor or ARB Beta-blocker Diuretics (if needed) Exclusion CV hospitalization within 6 weeks of entry CCS Class III or IV angina

Study CY 1121: Study Design Stable Heart Failure Patients Double-Blind/Placebo Controlled Cohort 1 N = 8 2-hr Infusion Cohort 2 N = 9 2-hr Infusion Cohort 3 N = 10 24-hr Infusion Cohort 4 N = 8 24-hr Infusion 4 Treatments 4 Treatments 4 Treatments 4 Treatments 3 Active Doses 1 Placebo Median Cmax 93-333 ng/ml 3 Active Doses 1 Placebo Median Cmax 333-662 ng/ml Cohort 5 N = 10 72-hr Infusion 2 Treatments 1 Active Dose 1 Placebo 3 Active Doses 1 Placebo Median Cmax 150-625 ng/ml 3 Active Doses 1 Placebo Median Cmax 152-626 ng/ml 45 Patients 564 Echos 151 Treatment Periods Median Cmax 750 ng/ml

Study CY 1121: Demographics and baseline characteristics Sex (male/female) Aetiology (ischemic/non-ischemic) Cohorts 1-5 (n = 45 patients) 39/6 29/16 Mean (Min.- Max.) Age (yrs) 58 30 77 Systolic BP (mmhg) 124 96 183 Diastolic BP (mmhg) 75 57 117 Heart rate (bpm) 69 48 96 Ejection fraction (%) 33 20 55

Δ SET (msec) LSM ± SEM Study CY 1121: Systolic ejection time Placebo Corrected Change from Baseline 100 80 60 40 20 <100 >100-200 >200-300 >300-400 >400-500 >500 *** *** *** *** *** [CK-452] (ng/ml) 0 p value for correlation < 0.0001 * ** *** p < 0.05 p < 0.01 p < 0.001

LSM ± SEM Study CY 1121: Stroke volume and heart rate Placebo Corrected Change from Baseline Δ Stroke Volume (ml) (Baseline 69 ml) Δ Heart Rate (bpm) (Baseline 66 bpm) 15 10 ** *** *** *** 15 10 5 5 0 0-5 -10 <100 >100-200 >200-300 >300-400 >400-500 >500-5 -10 ** *** <100 >100-200 >200-300 >300-400 >400-500 >500 [CK-452] (ng/ml) [CK-452] (ng/ml) p value for correlation < 0.0001 p value for correlation = 0.0003 * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001

LSM ± SEM Study CY 1121: LV end systolic volume and end diastolic volume Placebo Corrected Change from Baseline 15 Δ LV ESV (ml) (Baseline 168 ml) 15 Δ LV EDV (ml) (Baseline 243 ml) 5 5-5 -5-15 -15-25 ** <100 >100-200 >200-300 >300-400 >400-500 >500-25 <100 >100-200 >200-300 >300-400 >400-500 >500 [CK-452] (ng/ml) [CK-452] (ng/ml) ** p value for correlation < 0.0001 p value for correlation = 0.0005 * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001

Δ LVEF Hybrid (%) LSM ± SEM Study CY 1121: LV ejection fraction Placebo Corrected Change from Baseline (=32%) 15 <100 >100-200 >200-300 >300-400 >400-500 >500 [CK-452] (ng/ml) 10 *** *** *** 5 0 p value for correlation < 0.0001 LVEF Hybrid = LVOT SV/LVEDV MOD * ** *** p < 0.05 p < 0.01 p < 0.001

Study CY 1121: Safety Three SAEs (one deemed related to CK-452) Non ST elevation MI in patient with a drug overdose Septicemia in setting of diabetic foot ulcer Pneumonia Five patients were discontinued on study drug Two syndromes of clinical intolerance due to excessive [CK-452] Asymptomatic troponin I increase in severely hypertensive patient Local contractile dysfunction noted on echocardiogram; peer review of echocardiograms did not confirm finding QTc > 500 msec during infusion; core lab determined QTcF 493 msec at baseline, 499 msec at termination For patients tolerant of all study drug infusions, no consistent pattern of adverse events with either dose or duration of infusion emerged

CY 1221: Ischaemic cardiomyopathy trial Phase IIa Patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and angina (Ejection fraction 35%) Assess effect of i.v. infusion of omecamtiv mecarbil on symptom-limited treadmill exercise tolerability and plasma concentrations of oral formulation Cohort 1 45 patients Randomized 2:1 Omecamtiv mecarbil at lower dose i.v. (295 ng/ml) 20 hours oral (184 ng/ml) 7days or placebo Cohort 2 45 patients Randomized 2:1 Omecamtiv mecarbil at higher dose i.v. (550 ng/ml) 20 hours Oral (368 ng/ml) 7 days or placebo

CY 1221: Final Results Omecamtiv mecarbil did not have a negative impact on exercise performance/exercise induced ischaemia* at either dose No clinically important changes in vital signs, ECG parameters or cardiac enzymes Majority of adverse events classified as mild in severity 2 SAE s (both in same patient); determined by investigator unrelated to treatment Adverse Event Classification # Events Mild 23 Moderate 4 Severe 2 Total 29 Final data demonstrated drug dosing regimen was reasonably welltolerated. Data support progression into additional clinical trials * Proportion of patients who stopped exercise during i.v. infusion at a stage earlier than baseline and due to unacceptable angina (placebo: 1, omecamtiv mecarbil : 0)

Acute heart failure

Presentation for AHF Screening Randomization 1:1 Vital Status (phone call) Study 20100754: Design Sequential cohort enrollment of low, medium and high dose target AMG 423 plasma concentrations: 115, 230, 310 ng/ml Minimal in-hospital follow-up until 24 hrs after ending IP Omecamtiv mecarbil IV Minimal telemetry until 12 hrs after ending IP Randomization within 16 hours of presentation Placebo IV Loading Dose Maintenance Dose Earliest Discharge on Day 4 Study assessments: Daily until discharge or day 8, whichever is earlier On day of discharge Time 0 hr 4 hrs 48 hrs 72 hrs Day 4 Day 30 EOS Month 6 M A N D A T O R Y I N - H O S P I T A L S T A Y

Study 20100754: Sequential dosing design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential cohort trial in subjects with LVSD and hospitalization for AHF Omecamtiv IV: target conc ~115 ng/ml 1:1 randomization Placebo IV Omecamtiv IV: target conc ~230 ng/ml 1:1 randomization Placebo IV Omecamtiv IV: target conc ~310 ng/ml 1:1 randomization Placebo IV Enrollment and Treatment of Low Dose Cohort Enrollment and Treatment of Medium Dose Cohort Enrollment and Treatment of High Dose Cohort DMC data review and recommendation for next dose level DMC data review and recommendation for next dose level

Study 20100754: Efficacy endpoints Primary Endpoint Dyspnea symptom response: Minimally, moderately or markedly better by 7-point Likert scale at 6 hours after investigational product initiation, AND moderately or markedly better at 24 and 48 hours after investigational product initiation without worsening heart failure or death from any cause by 48 hours Secondary Endpoints Death from any cause or worsening HF within 7 days of IP Worsening heart failure within 7 days of IP Dyspnea at each scheduled assessment Patient Global Assessment NT-proBNP Length of initial hospital stay and days alive out of hospital until day 30

Study 20100754: Safety and PK endpoints Safety Endpoint Adverse events and serious adverse events Significant changes in laboratory values and vital signs Significant changes from baseline ECGs PK (All Subjects) Plasma concentration of omecamtiv mecarbil at selected time points Plasma concentration of circulating metabolites, including omecamtiv mecarbil M1 and M3 metabolites at selected time points

Summary and conclusions Omecamtiv mecarbil (CK-1827452/AMG 423) is a novel agent which increases the duration of systole by selectively activating cardiac myosin Does not seem to have effects that characterise previously studied inotropes i.e. does not increase intracellular calcium concentrations and myocardial oxygen consumption Evolving clinical programme includes: Intravenous formulation being tested in acute HF Oral formulation is being developed for possible use in outpatient setting