Tobacco Control. (Update 2008)

Similar documents
Country profile. Myanmar

Country profile. Lebanon

Country profile. Nepal

Country profile. Timor-Leste

Submission to the World Health Organization on the Global Tobacco Control Committee

Country profile. Austria

Country profile. Poland

Country profile. Hungary

WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Country profile. Brazil

Country profile. Sweden

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Country profile. Canada

Country profile. Trinidad and Tobago

Country profile. Italy

Country profile. Gambia. Note: Where no data were available, " " shows in the table. Where data were not required, " " shows in the table.

Country profile. Russian Federation. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status

Country profile. Angola

Country profile. Bahrain. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 20 March 2007

Country profile. Egypt

Country profile. Senegal

Country profile. Turkmenistan. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 13 May 2011

Country profile. Switzerland

Country profile. New Zealand

Country profile. Yemen

Country profile. Republic of Moldova

Country profile. Ukraine

Country profile. Gambia

Country profile. Morocco

Country profile. Colombia. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 10 April 2008

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Country profile. Cuba

Country profile. Norway

Lao People's Democratic Republic

Higher rate now: Why excise tax on tobacco is long overdue for an increase

Country profile. Chad

Country profile. Guinea

Country profile. Indonesia. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)

Tobacco-Control Policy Workshop:

LAW OF MONGOLIA. 01 July, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia LAW ON TOBACCO CONTROL CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

Burkina Faso. Report card on the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. 29 October Contents. Introduction

South Africa. Report card on the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. 18 July Contents. Introduction

ACTION PLAN. Intergovernmental Coordinating Body, Ministry of Finance. Intergovernmental Coordinating Body, Ministry of Finance

Report card on the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

Mali. Report card on the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. 17 January Contents. Introduction. Mali entry into force of the WHO FCTC

GATS Highlights. GATS Objectives. GATS Methodology

APPENDIX V: COUNTRY PROFILES

RESPONSE FROM ALTRIA:

Problem Which option Additional option Additional comments definition Yes No change No further observations.

PUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

Key Elements of this Presentation. Smoking Still Main Cause of Premature Death 31/10/2013. The Case for Plain Packaging

Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe has not signed and has not ratified the WHO FCTC. Report card on the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

POSSIBLE REVISION OF THE TOBACCO PRODUCTS DIRECTIVE 2001/37/EC PUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

Uganda. Report card on the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. 18 September Contents. Introduction

AMA Submission House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health and Ageing inquiry into the

Tobacco Control in Taiwan: A Taiwanese NGO Perspective. Sea-Wain Yau John Tung Foundation

The Economics of Smoking

Message From the Minister

Ministerial Round Table: Accelerating implementation of WHO FCTC in SEAR

LAW OF MONGOLIA. 01 July 2005 Ulaanbaatar city ON TOBACCO CONTROL. (revised) CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS

FDA s Action Agenda to Reduce Tobacco Related-Cancer Incidence and Mortality

5,000. Number of cigarettes 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000

RNAO response to proposed regulation under Smoke-Free Ontario Act, 2017

Tobacco Control in Ukraine. Second National Report. Kyiv: Ministry of Health of Ukraine p.

Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products FAQ

SMOKE - FREE ONTARIO. The Next Chapter For a Healthier Ontario

Canadian Experience in Tobacco Regulations. NCDs Expert Meeting Washington, DC November 17, 2014

- Decree nº (January 2 nd, 2006) Promulgates the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1 P age

LAW OF MONGOLIA. 01 July 2005 Government Palace, Ulaanbaatar TOBACCO CONTROL (revised version by 2012) CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS

Tobacco Free Ireland Action Plan

An Overview of the Government of Canada s Approach to Legalize, Regulate and Restrict Access to Cannabis. February 2018

MYANMAR 2011 COUNTRY REPORT GLOBAL YOUTH TOBACCO SURVEY (GYTS)

An Overview of the Government of Canada s Approach to Legalize, Regulate and Restrict Access to Cannabis

WHO/NMH/TFI/11.3. Warning about the dangers of tobacco. Executive summary. fresh and alive

The Global Tobacco Problem

TFI WHO 20 Avenue Appia 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. Gentlemen:

Who is Targeting You? The Tobacco Industry Those who want to profit from your smoking

PACKAGING AND LABELING The Brazilian Experience

REPORT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES. Subject: Annual Update on Activities and Progress in Tobacco Control: March 2017 through February 2018

Research Study: Court-Ordered Corrections of Tobacco Industry Racketeering PRELIMINARY REPORT Background Methods Results Conclusions

Healthy People, Healthy Communities

Global Adult Tobacco Survey TURKEY. Dr. Peyman ALTAN MoH Tobacco Control Dep. Ankara November 2018

TOBACCO FREE CAMPUS POLICY

Mitch Zeller, Director, Center for Tobacco Products, FDA September 19, 2013 Kansas Public Health Association

From Congress to California Communities: The Federal Tobacco Control Act

Tobacco Surveillance and Evaluation: An Update

Policy Options for the Regulation of Electronic Cigarettes

Copyright Canadian Nurses Association 50 Driveway Ottawa, Ont. K2P 1E2 CANADA

Open Letter to Financial Secretary, Hong Kong SAR Government

MDQuit Best Practices Conference January 26, Presented by William C. Tilburg Deputy Director

Social and Policy Perspective on Tobacco Use

burden of tobacco Key Findings about the Use and Consequences of Tobacco in Peel

Advancing the Tobacco Endgame: Evidence and Progress. alpha Board Meeting April 24 th, 2015 Robert Schwartz

GLOBAL YOUTH TOBACCO SURVEY REPORT - Antigua & Barbuda

Submission by the Federation of European Cancer Societies to the Public Hearings on the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

Packaging and Labeling of Tobacco Products in Hong Kong Vienna LAI Wai-yin Executive Director Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health

RADM Patrick O Carroll, MD, MPH Senior Advisor, Assistant Secretary for Health, US DHSS

Transcription:

Tobacco Control (Update 2008) CMA POLICY Tobacco is an addictive and hazardous product, and the number one cause of preventable disease and death in Canada. Canada s physicians, who see the devastating effects of tobacco use every day in their practices, have been working for decades toward the goal of a smoke-free Canada. The CMA issued its first public warning concerning the hazards of tobacco in 1954 and has continued ever since to advocate for the strongest possible measures to control its use. It is estimated that over 37,000 deaths each year are attributable to tobacco use. Tobacco imposes a heavy burden on society in the form of hospital care, disability, absenteeism and loss of productivity. Health Canada estimates that tobacco costs this country $17 billion annually of which $4.4 billion constitutes direct health care costs. Since 2001, Canada s smoking rate has fallen from 25% to below 20%; the decline has been particularly dramatic among young people. The drop is attributed mainly to a comprehensive tobacco control strategy that employs a variety of different interventions, including high prices and taxes, bans on smoking in public places, restrictions on advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products, and social marketing programs to de-normalize tobacco use and the tobacco industry. While Canada is to be congratulated on its success to date, it needs to maintain an environment that encourages Canadians to remain tobacco free, if it is to sustain and improve upon these rates. To ensure such an environment, the CMA believes that all governments in Canada should continue to implement a comprehensive, coordinated and effective tobacco control strategy which should include the following elements: Legislation and regulation The CMA supports strong comprehensive tobacco control legislation, enacted and enforced by all levels of government. Many strong laws and regulations have already been enacted; but some areas remain to be addressed. The CMA recommends that Canadian governments enact the following measures to strengthen tobacco control: Advertising and promotion: The CMA supports a total comprehensive ban on all advertising and promotion of tobacco. In 2007, the Supreme Court of Canada declared that such a ban is 2008 Canadian Medical Association. You may, for your non-commercial use, reproduce, in whole or in part and in any form or manner, unlimited copies of CMA Policy Statements provided that credit is given to the original source. Any other use, including republishing, redistribution, storage in a retrieval system or posting on a Web site requires explicit permission from CMA. Please contact the Permissions Coordinator, Publications, CMA, 1867 Alta Vista Dr., Ottawa ON K1G 3Y6; fax 613 565-2382; permissions@cma.ca. Correspondence and requests for additional copies should be addressed to the Member Service Centre, Canadian Medical Association, 1867 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, ON K1G 3Y6; tel 888 855-2555 or 613 731-8610 x2307; fax 613 236-8864. All polices of the CMA are available electronically through CMA Online (www.cma.ca).

constitutional. Canada currently permits a limited amount of tobacco promotion, and must enact a comprehensive ban if it wishes to comply with the terms of the World Health Organization s (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), to which it is a signatory. In order to make the current promotion restrictions complete, Canada should enact: a ban on the sale of non-tobacco products displaying tobacco brand names, logos or colours; a nationwide ban on the display of tobacco products at point of sale, as has been implemented in some provinces; a ban on all tobacco-brand marketing associated with the sponsorship of sports, cultural and other events. In addition, the CMA recommends that the tobacco industry be prohibited from using contests or similar events as promotional activities; and restrictions on cross-border advertising of tobacco products. Tobacco manufacturers make frequent use of subtle marketing messages to render smoking attractive and glamorous to young people. The CMA supports educational and public relations initiatives aimed at countering these messages. For example, movie classification systems should restrict access by children and youth to films that portray tobacco use and tobacco product placement. Descriptors and packaging: The CMA supports a ban on the use of misleading terms such as light and mild to describe tobacco products with low tar content. There is no evidence that low-tar cigarettes reduce the health risk to smokers. The CMA also calls for an end to brand extensions, such as colours, numbers and code words, which are being used to replace descriptors such as light. One way to negate the risk of misleading labelling is to require that tobacco products be sold in plain packages a measure that Canada was among the first countries to consider in the 1980s. These packages should display prominent, simple and powerful health warnings, such as the graphic pictorial warnings pioneered by Canada, as well as quit tips and information on product content and health risks. There should also be a minimum package size for all tobacco products, to guard against the use of small-size kiddie packs for single sales of cigars or cigarillos. Access: The CMA recommends that existing regulations involving the sale of tobacco to minors be strictly enforced, with substantial fines for violators. Restrictions on buying tobacco products should be enacted for Canadians of all ages. In addition to supporting existing bans on cigarette vending machines and self-service displays, the CMA recommends tightening the licensing system to limit the number of outlets where tobacco products can be purchased. The more restricted is tobacco availability, the easier it is to regulate. Product regulation: The CMA congratulates the Government of Canada on requiring that tobacco products be modified to reduce their risk of starting fires. In addition, the CMA recommends that the federal government set ceilings on the content of toxic ingredients such as tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide in tobacco products, and lower these ceilings progressively. The federal government should exercise its legislative power to regulate the content of tobacco products, for example, by banning flavourings such as menthol and clove. The CMA recommends that any new products or product changes made by the tobacco industry be studied and evaluated by an 2

independent research body, prior to being approved for marketing. Financial disincentives: Price controls are one of the most effective means of discouraging smoking, particularly among young people; a 10% rise in cigarette prices has been associated with a 4% decrease in tobacco use by teenagers. The CMA supports high prices and taxes on tobacco products, and recommends that governments progressively raise taxes as a disincentive to use. All taxes collected from tobacco products should be allocated to providing health care for Canadians, including programs to discourage smoking. Sale of contraband tobacco has become a major problem in recent years. To discourage the smuggling of lower-cost cigarettes, the CMA recommends that the federal government work with other countries to ensure that tobacco prices are harmonized across national borders. In addition, all levels of government should take the strongest possible measures to control the sale and distribution of contraband tobacco, on their own and in cooperation with other affected jurisdictions. Sustainable programs: Effective implementation of a comprehensive tobacco control program requires an ongoing commitment by all levels of government. The CMA calls on governments to commit to sustained, well-funded and comprehensive programs to reduce tobacco use, combining policy interventions with educational and social-marketing interventions including mass media campaigns. These programs should reflect current best practices, and be evaluated regularly for effectiveness and impact. Support for global tobacco control: Effective tobacco control measures such as those described above are required not only in Canada; but worldwide, particularly in developing countries, where multinational tobacco companies are promoting their products aggressively to make up for loss of revenue in their Western markets. Canada was one of the first countries to ratify the WHO s FCTC; the CMA commends the Government of Canada for showing this leadership and hopes it will continue to do so by implementing all elements of the FCTC in Canada, and providing financial support for implementation globally. Reduction of tobacco use in high-risk populations The tobacco strategy recommended above involves population-based tools, which have demonstrated their effectiveness in addressing an epidemic that touches every Canadian to some extent. These should be augmented with tools to reach high-risk or hard-to-reach populations, such as: Young people: Most current smokers in Canada started smoking before the age of 17, many before the age of 12. Chewing tobacco is becoming increasingly popular among young people, adding to the already considerable risk that they will become predisposed to cigarette use. Young people are particularly vulnerable to peer pressure, and to tobacco industry marketing tactics. The CMA supports continued health promotion and social marketing programs aimed at addressing the reasons why young people use tobacco, preventing them from starting to use tobacco and encouraging them to quit, and raising their awareness of tobacco industry marketing tactics so that they can recognize and counteract them. These programs should be continuously available in schools and should begin in the earliest primary grades. The CMA also recommends to provincial/territorial and municipal governments that tobacco use be banned, both outdoors and indoors, on all school properties and post-secondary campuses. 3

Aboriginal peoples: Tobacco has ceremonial significance among First Nations peoples; the harm associated with tobacco arises not from its ceremonial use but from its daily, repeated abuse. It is estimated that almost 60% of Aboriginal people smoke. Tobacco control policies such as bans on smoking in public places and on sales to minors, may be poorly implemented on reserves. The CMA recommends that governments work with Aboriginal leaders in developing meaningful, well-funded programs to discourage tobacco use on reserves, and in implementing policies that raise the level of tobacco control on First Nations communities to FCTC standards. Other populations at risk: Some populations, such as pregnant women, may be at particularly high health risk from tobacco use. Other populations, for example people on low incomes, have higher smoking rates than the overall Canadian population and may not have received the full benefit of existing tobacco control programs. Interventions should be created specifically for these target groups, to augment rather than replace programs designed for the overall population. They should address the concerns of target groups in a culturally relevant manner and should be designed with their input. Control of environmental tobacco smoke Second-hand or environmental tobacco smoke is an established health hazard, particularly for children, pregnant women and people with respiratory problems. Nearly all provinces and territories, and the federal government, have enacted legislation banning smoking in public places and workplaces. The CMA has always supported this move; in 2003, we committed to holding annual meetings only in jurisdictions where legislation ensured a 100% ban on smoking in indoor public places. The CMA encourages all smokers to restrict their smoking to areas where it will not jeopardize the health of others, and particularly encourages Canadians to keep their homes and cars smoke-free. All jurisdictions should work toward banning smoking in cars when children are present, and in other locations, such as day care centres, in which second-hand smoke may constitute a hazard to non-smokers. Accountability of the tobacco industry Internal industry documents have revealed that tobacco manufacturers knew for many years about the dangerous and addictive nature of their products but consistently suppressed this knowledge, and misinformed the public, when promoting them. The CMA recommends that the federal government initiate a transparent review of the practices of the tobacco industry and closely monitor its activities. The CMA also encourages initiatives aimed at bringing the industry s duplicitous activities to the attention of the public. The tobacco industry has taken a number of steps to promote itself as a good corporate citizen, and the CMA urges Canadians to be aware of such self-serving moves. Since 2004, the CMA has urged the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board to divest itself of its tobacco holdings. Recently, the tobacco industry has made a bid for legitimacy in the research field by establishing partnerships with academic centres or sponsoring research activities. The CMA opposes the involvement and/or sponsorship of the tobacco industry in education and research at universities, colleges and medical research institutions and recommends that all Canadian medical schools adopt policies banning donations and/or grants from the tobacco industry. The CMA advocates eliminating the Canadian tobacco-growing and tobacco-manufacturing industries and deplores the domestic 4

manufacture of tobacco products for export. The CMA supports stringent reporting requirements on the tobacco industry concerning all aspects of manufacturing, distribution and sale; this information should be made available to the public regularly. The CMA also supports in principle efforts to hold the tobacco industry legally accountable for the health care costs attributable to tobacco use. Any settlements from such lawsuits should be used specifically for health care (including tobacco-control programs) and not diverted to any other purposes. Helping patients become smoke-free The CMA believes that the health care sector should act decisively to prevent and reduce tobacco use. Smoking should not be permitted in health care facilities. Pharmacies should refrain from selling tobacco products, and those provinces and territories which have not banned sales of tobacco products in pharmacies and other health care facilities are urged to do so. Smoking is prohibited at the CMA and at all its official and social functions. The association has a long-standing policy of refusing to accept advertising from tobacco companies for any of its publications and refusing to purchase or hold tobacco-product stocks in investment portfolios for its members. The CMA recommends that those few physicians who still smoke become nonsmokers. Physicians should refrain from stocking magazines that carry tobacco advertising and refuse to invest in tobaccoindustry stocks. Helping patients become tobacco-free is one of the most important services a health professional can offer; even a brief counselling session with a health care provider on the dangers of smoking and the importance of quitting is a cost-effective method of tobacco control. Physicians and other health professionals can discourage tobacco use by practising systematic clinical tobacco interventions, which may include: routinely counselling children and youth against starting to smoke or chew tobacco; taking advantage of teachable moments, such as pregnancy or respiratory illness, to empathetically motivate smokers to quit; asking each patient about current smoking status and readiness to change; and offering personalized care, which may include setting a target quit date and offering behavioural counselling and pharmacotherapy. The CMA recommends that clinical tobacco intervention be recognized as an essential part of medical care and a core medical service. Pharmacotherapy has been established as an effective therapy for smoking cessation and should be made affordable for patients who require it. The CMA has taken an active role in developing and disseminating tobacco-control resources for physicians, their office staff and their patients. In 2001, the CMA and eight other health professional associations released a joint statement affirming the vital role of health professionals in counselling patients against tobacco use. The CMA will continue to build on these recommendations and its previous activity, working with other stakeholders toward the goal of a tobacco-free Canada. 5