ChondroMimetic Osteochondral Cartilage Repair Clinical Study. Results of Eight-Year Follow Up February 21, 2018

Similar documents
ChondroMimetic Clinical Study Update. September 20, 2017

YEAR DATA STEP. Proven results in cartilage repair. CARGEL Bioscaffold. Supporting healthcare professionals for over 150 years

Horizon Scanning Centre November Spheroids of human autologous matrix-associated chondrocytes (Chondrosphere) for articular cartilage defects

Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes of Atelocollagenassociated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for the Repair of Chondral Defects of the Knee

New Directions in Osteoarthritis Research

Knee Articular Cartilage Restoration: From cells to the patient. Professor Lars Engebretsen, University of Oslo, Norway

Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Functional and T2 MRI Outcomes at Mid to Long-term follow-up

OSTEOCHONDRAL ALLOGRAFT RECONSTRUCTION FOR MASSIVE BONE DEFECT

Joint Preservation Clinical Case

Articular Cartilage Surgical Restoration Options

OSTEOCHONDRAL ALLOGRAFTS AND AUTOGRAFTS IN THE TREATMENT OF FOCAL ARTICULAR CARTILAGE LESIONS

TREATMENT OF CARTILAGE LESIONS

AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION FOR FOCAL ARTICULAR CARTILAGE LESIONS

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation. Gerard Hardisty FRACS

ARTICULAR CARTILAGE INJURY: EVALUATION AND WORK-UP ISMF Carlsbad Ca.

Outcome after meniscectomy? Val D Isere 2014 update

Case Report. Byung Ill Lee, MD and Byoung Min Kim, MD Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Knee Preservation and Articular Cartilage Restoration

OCD: Beyond Microfracture. Disclosures. OCD Talus: My Approach 2/23/2018

Histologic change of cartilage layer of osteochondritis dissecans before and after fixation in the knee

Meniscal Tears/Deficiency in Athletes

OATS/MOSAICPLASTY/MEGA-OATS

NeoCart Phase 3 Clinical Trial Results Call

Chondral Injuries in the Athlete

Basics of Cartilage Restoration Introduction of TruFit

Osteochondral regeneration. Getting to the core of the problem.

8/10/2016. Treatment of Articular Cartilage Injuries: Osteochondral autograft Osteochondral allograft DISCLOSURES CONSIDERATIONS:

Disclaimers. Concerns after ACL Tear 3/13/2018. Outcomes after ACLR. Sports, Knee, Shoulder Symposium Snowbird, Utah February 24, 2018

CARTILAGE REPAIR PROCEDURES IN LARGE CARTILAGE DEFECTS

Transformational Products in Soft Tissue Regeneration and Cartilage Repair

Osteochondral allografting for all other joints is not covered as the evidence is insufficient to determine the

PATIENT GUIDE TO CARTILAGE INJURIES

ACI < > < > +/- MSC MSC MASS

Evaluation & Treatment of the Injured Athlete Autograft OATS versus Osteochondral Allograft Technique: Indications, Problems, Outcomes

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation and Autograft Transfer System (OATS/mosaicplasty) in the Treatment of Articular

Knee Dislocation: Spectrum of Injury, Evolution of Treatment & Modern Outcomes

Biologics for Sports Injuries

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

Stem Cells and Sport Medicine

Disclosures. Reverse Engineer To Solve a Problem. Consider the big 6. Natural history vs. Surgical intervention. Which is better?

Department of Orthopedic Surgery

Patella Instability 1 st Time Dislocation

Page: 1 of 21. Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Focal Articular Cartilage Lesions

Disclosures. How to approach cartilage repair. Articular Cartilage Problems: Surface Options

Corporate Medical Policy

POLICY PRODUCT VARIATIONS DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND RATIONALE DEFINITIONS BENEFIT VARIATIONS DISCLAIMER CODING INFORMATION REFERENCES POLICY HISTORY

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Other Cell-based Treatments of Focal Articular Cartilage Lesions. Original Policy Date

Autografts and Allografts in the Treatment of Focal Articular Cartilage Lesions

Marrow (MSC) Stimulation Techniques: Microfracture/Microfracture Plus/Cartiform Kai Mithoefer, MD

Biologics in ACL: What s the Data?

Rakesh Patel, MD 4/9/09

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Focal Articular Cartilage Lesions

AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTATION IN THE KNEE

Intra-articular Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for the Human Joint

26/01/17. ACL injury in handball. Treatment of acute ACL injury. Young people with old knees. Women, soccer and knee injuries. Treatment options?

Knee Cartilage Transplants

Non- surgical management of chondral defects and OA- Mesenchymal stem cells. Dr Dan Bates (B.Med, BSc(HONS) Sports Medicine Registrar

AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTS & COLLAGEN MENISCUS IMPLANTS IN THE KNEE

Medial Meniscal Root Tears: When to rehab? When to repair? When to debride. Christopher Betz, DO Orthopedics Sports Medicine Bristol, CT

Cartilage Repair Center Brigham and Women s Hospital Harvard Medical School

Cartilage Repair Options

vs Microfracture Clear Indications Clinical Superiority Results from LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1 Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial proving Gothenburg

Specialists in Joint Replacement, Spinal Surgery, Orthopaedics and Sport Injuries. Cartilage Surgery. The Knee.

Meniscal Allograft Transplantation in the Adolescent Population

Cartilage Care in the Mature Female Athlete

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 6 October 2010

Clinical Application of Scaffolds for Partial Meniscus Replacement

Clinical Policy Title: Autologous chondrocyte implantation

Does Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Provide Better Outcomes Than Microfracture in the Repair of Articular Knee Defects?

Inside-Out Meniscal Repair Still the Gold Standard?

MosaicPlasty Osteochondral Grafting

Table of Contents. 621 Lake Avenue, Unit 3A, Asbury Park, NJ Phone: Fax: gomohealth.com

Disclosures. Background. Background

Advances in cartilage and soft tissue injuries of the knee

Osteochondral Knee Injuries. Marc N Ialenti, MD PGY-4 8/19/14

ARTICULAR CARTILAGE RESTORATION: A REVIEW OF CURRENTLY AVAILABLE METHODS FOR REPAIR OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE DEFECTS

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Overview. Wishful Thinking. I (and/or my co authors) have something to disclose. Are we really regenerating anything? 2/7/2018

St Vincent s SportsMed

AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTATION IN THE KNEE

CARTILAGE REPAIR INTRODUCTION. M. BERRUTO and G.M. PERETTI 1,2. Received January 6, Accepted January 8, 2013

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: OSTEOCHONDRAL GRAFTING

AMIC or ACI for arthroscopic repair of grade IV acetabular cartilage defects in femoroacetabular impingement.

CLINICAL OUTCOME & MORPHOMETRY OVER 2 & 5 YEARS - data from a treatment RCT on acute ACL injury

Medical Practice for Sports Injuries and Disorders of the Knee

BASELINE QUESTIONNAIRE (SURGEON)

AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTATION IN THE KNEE

SSSR. 1. Nov Ankle. Postoperative Imaging of Cartilage Repair. and Lateral Ligament Reconstruction

3/13/2018. Cartilage Cases. Case. Physical exam

Treatment of Acute Traumatic Knee Dislocations

Treatment of Acute Traumatic Knee Dislocations

POSITION STATEMENT The Use of Osteochondral Transplantation for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Preventing Joint Injury & Subsequent Osteoarthritis:

5:05 6:05 pm Live Surgery: office based Arthroscopy (Trice Medical) (1 hr) Surgeon: Sean McMillan, DO Moderator: Chris Uggen, MD

Why anteromedial portal is the best

The cellfree matrix for autoregeneration of articular cartilage defects

Anterolateral Ligament. Bradd G. Burkhart, MD Orlando Orthopaedic Center Sports Medicine

Theses and Dissertations--Rehabilitation Sciences

Osteo-chondral Transplantation (OATS) The Unhappy ACL. Dr Ivan Popoff Knee, Elbow & Shoulder Surgery

Transcription:

ChondroMimetic Osteochondral Cartilage Repair Clinical Study Results of Eight-Year Follow Up February 21, 2018

ChondroMimetic Osteochondral Scaffold ChondroMimetic is an all arthroscopic, single-surgery, cost-effective solution for osteochondral defect repair backed by 8 years of clinical evidence All arthroscopic instrumentation, fully sterile kit, compatible with existing surgical techniques Single surgery procedure, not requiring cell harvesting and expansion Cost effective, projected to be 10% of the cost of other cell-based therapies Strong clinical evidence; backed by a longitudinal 8-year clinical study 2

Study Highlights Single-centre study of 15 patients (7 female, 8 male) followed over 8 years; average age at time of surgery of 32.7 years (range 18.7 to 47.9) Long-term durability of cartilage regeneration confirmed by advanced MRI analysis Quantitative MRI using 3D reconstruction demonstrated 95% defect fill T2 mapping demonstrated structural quality nearly identical to native cartilage Improvement in patient clinical outcomes: Modified Cincinnati Rating measures functional and clinical status after knee surgery Improvement from 64.4 pre-op to 80.9 after 8-years 1 ; graded excellent Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) 2 Better / equal to expensive two-stage cartilage repair technologies; graded excellent 1. Highly statistically significant change (p=0.0065) 2. Clinical measure of symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sports and recreation, and knee-related quality of life 3

Thought-Leader Feedback Based on our first-hand clinical experience with ChondroMimetic, and these new results confirming the sustainability of both cartilage regeneration and the improvement in patient outcomes, it is my firm belief that this scaffold has an important place in the treatment of focal chondral lesions as an alternative to microfracture. Professor László Hangody, MD, PhD, DSc Uzsoki Hospital, Budapest, Hungary Inventor of the Mosaicplasty Osteochondral Autograft Technique The long-term quantitative MRI data of cartilage repair volume and tissue quality in patients who were treated with ChondroMimetic are extremely attractive. This is consistent with the previously performed animal studies which showed a 25% improvement in cartilage repair over controls. Dr. Alan Getgood, Mphil, MD FRCS (Tr & Orth) Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, London, Ontario, Canada 4

ChondroMimetic Clinical Study Update Summary Original Study Single centre study to confirm the safety and early outcomes with ChondroMimetic in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee 6-Month clinical trial enrolled 17 patients in 2009-2010 6-Month results demonstrated safety and improved clinical outcomes MRI data analysed in 2017 indicated early improved structural defect repair Extension Study 15 patients assessed in 2017 for prospective 8-year extension study Study to assess long-term sustained cartilage defect repair Full data analysis completed February, 2018 5

Study Key Measures 3D quantitative MRI analysis Repair tissue morphology to measure % fill of defect T2 mapping to assess the structure and quality of cartilage Clinical and functional outcome scores Modified Cincinnati Rating System Scoring of occupational / athletic activities, symptoms, & functional limitations in sports and daily life Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Patient-relevant evaluation of knee injuries and posttraumatic osteoarthritis of Pain, Symptoms, Activities of daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sports), and quality of life (QoL) Refer to summary study design and methods in the appendix 6

Repair Tissue Morphology: Defect Fill at 8 Years Follow-up Near complete filling of defect across all patients 10 Day Post-operative Volume: Baseline Cartilage Bone ChondroMimetic 8 Year Post-operative Volume: Cartilage Repair Fill (%) Cartilage Bone Total Fill Average Cartilage Fill (%): 95.1 7

Structural Quality (T2 Mapping): T2 Values at 8 Years Follow-up Regenerated cartilage nearly indistinguishable from native cartilage at 8 years ChondroMimetic Average Repair Tissue T2 Relation Time ChondroMimetic T2 values compare favorably to microfracture and alternative therapy in similar MRI assessment in published study (graph below) ChondroMimetic at 8-years: 52.5 ms Native cartilage control: 52.3 ms Shive et al, Cartilage, 2015 8

Clinical Study Case Report 1 at 8 Years Follow-up Study Subject 02, Female, 39 yrs old, 28 BMI, primary repair (2 implants) 2 ChondroMimetic implants Hyper-intense peri-implant boundaries Lack of cartilaginous repair tissue Iso-intense peri-implant boundaries Cartilaginous repair tissue Previous bone defect filled with bony repair tissue Previous cartilage defect filled with cartilaginous repair tissue 2D MRI 10 Days Post-op 6 months Post-op 8 yrs, 4 mos Post-op Native Cartilage Original Scaffold 3D MRI Reconstruction 9

Clinical Study Case Report 2 at 8 Years Follow-up Study Subject 03, Female, 29 yrs old, 28 BMI, backfill (5 implants) 5 ChondroMimetic implants Hyper-intense peri-implant boundaries Lack of cartilaginous repair tissue Bone integration Cartilaginous repair tissue 6 months Post-op Previous bone defect filled with bony repair tissue Previous cartilage defect filled with cartilaginous repair tissue 2D MRI 10 Days Post-op 6 months Post-op 8 yrs, 3 mos Post-op Native Cartilage Original Scaffold 3D MRI Reconstruction 10

Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating Scores Longitudinal Modified Cincinnati Scores Score 100 80 60 40 Improved 64.4 pre-op to 80.9 at 8 years Highly statistically significant (p=0.0065) 8-year overall grading of excellent 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Data represents means ± SE N=17 for 1, 3 and 6 months; n=15 for 8 years Time (Years) 11

KOOS Scores, Literature Comparison Single-Surgery ChondroMimetic vs Two-Stage Cell Therapies KOOS Subscore (Mean) 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 - KOOS Scores for Chondromimetic vs ChondroCelect (CCI) and MACI Symptoms Pain ADL Sports QOL Chondromimetic CCI MACI Data represents means ± SE ChondroMimetic 8-year, n=15 CCI 18-month data from Saris AJSM 2008, n=44 MACI 2-year data from Saris AJSM 2014, n=72 Sports & Recreation subscale not reported in Saris 2008 ChondroMimetic KOOS scores equal to or better than well known cell-based technologies Subscales for ChondroMimetic generally superior at 8 years than cell-based technologies at 1.5-2 years ChondroMimetic is expected to be 10% of the cost of two-stage cell therapies, implying favorable health-economic benefits 12

Conclusions and Next Steps Study confirms sustained long-term regeneration of cartilage and improved clinical symptoms: 3D MRI data shows long-term cartilage durability and sub-chondral bone remodeling T2 data shows improvements in cartilage quality from 6 months to 8 years T2 data shows cartilage quality nearly identical to surrounding native cartilage at 8 years Modified Cincinnati Score significantly improved from baseline, with 8-year overall grading of excellent KOOS scores equal to / better than cell-based therapies Regulatory approval targeted for second half of 2018 Submission process started with notified body for CE Mark Staged data submission to begin this quarter 13

Appendix Study Design and Methods 14

ChondroMimetic 6-Month Clinical Study Design Open label, prospective single to confirm the safety and early outcomes with ChondroMimetic in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee February 2009 - October 2010 GCP-Compliant, single center, Uzsoki Hospital, Traumatology department, Prof. Laszlo Hangody, Budapest, Hungary 17 Subjects 15 mosaicplasty backfill defects 2 primary cartilage defects Assessments at 6 months Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain Modified Cincinnati Rating System Bandi Score MRI (MOCART) Optional osteochondral biopsy 15

ChondroMimetic Clinical Extension Study Design Extension study to determine the long-term (8 years) outcomes of the original patients Major protocol modifications include 3D MRI, T2 analysis, and KOOS questionnaire New data to demonstrate long-term durability of clinical outcomes and structural repair Open label, prospective extension study to confirm the safety and long-term outcomes with ChondroMimetic in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee June 2017 - October 2017 GCP-Compliant (NAMSA-monitored), single center, Uzsoki Hospital, Traumatology department, Prof. Laszlo Hangody, Budapest, Hungary 15 of 17 Subjects who completed 6 month protocol 13 mosaicplasty backfill defects 2 primary cartilage defects Assessments at single follow-up visit Modified Cincinnati Rating System Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) MRI: Repair tissue quantity (Quantitative morphological analysis), Quality (T2 relaxation time) and subjective scoring (MOCART)

Advanced 3D Quantitative MRI Analysis To assess sustainability, completeness of bone and cartilage defect filling, and cartilage quality, applied to both 6-Month and 8-Year data sets T2 Mapping Technique to evaluate knee cartilage Assesses the 3D structure of cartilage Used in research studies to detect diseaseand treatment-related changes to cartilage Repair Tissue Morphology Technique to quantify the % fill of both cartilage and bone Used to provide quantitative and statistical analysis of completeness of bone and cartilage defect filling Normal Degenerative Time of Surgery After Healing / Remodelling Cartilage Bone ChondroMimetic Cartilage Bone Total 17

Atlas-based Segmentation 1. Automatic (unsupervised) definition of the different anatomical knee regions based on programmed atlas. 2. Confirmation or correction and lesion identification by radiologist 3. 3-D Reconstruction and analysis of ROIs (lesion, Fill, control) from segmentation Medial WB Medial Posterior Condyle *Courtesy of Qmetrics Technologies, Rochester, NY Trochlea Lateral WB Lateral Posterior Condyle Tibia Lateral Tibia Medial

Key Clinical Outcomes Measures Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System* Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)* Developed for scoring of occupational and athletic activities, symptoms, and functional limitations in sports and daily life. 11 components including measurements of physical examination, instrumented knee stability, testing and radiographic findings. Developed to assess patient-relevant evaluation of knee injuries and posttraumatic osteoarthritis 5 dimensions scored: Pain Symptoms Activities of daily living (ADL) Function in sport and recreation (Sports) Knee-related quality of life (QoL) * Lysholm et al, Acta Orthopaedica, 2007 19