All reverse-worded items were scored accordingly and are in the appropriate direction in the data set.

Similar documents
Multifactor Confirmatory Factor Analysis

A Factor Analytic Evaluation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale

Understanding University Students Implicit Theories of Willpower for Strenuous Mental Activities

Scale Building with Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Preschool Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) (1.5 5 yrs.) among Canadian children

Paul Irwing, Manchester Business School

Running head: CFA OF TDI AND STICSA 1. p Factor or Negative Emotionality? Joint CFA of Internalizing Symptomology

On the Performance of Maximum Likelihood Versus Means and Variance Adjusted Weighted Least Squares Estimation in CFA

AFSP SURVIVOR OUTREACH PROGRAM VOLUNTEER TRAINING HANDOUT

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

Title: The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Texting While Driving Behavior in College Students MS # Manuscript ID GCPI

Running head: CFA OF STICSA 1. Model-Based Factor Reliability and Replicability of the STICSA

Table S1: Perceived Devaluation Discrimination Scale: Item Wording, Frequency Distributions, Item and Scale Statistics 1. Strongly Agree (3) % (N) (7)

Running head: NESTED FACTOR ANALYTIC MODEL COMPARISON 1. John M. Clark III. Pearson. Author Note

Worksheet # 1 Why We Procrastinate

Doing Quantitative Research 26E02900, 6 ECTS Lecture 6: Structural Equations Modeling. Olli-Pekka Kauppila Daria Kautto

From the scenario below please identify the situation, thoughts, and emotions/feelings.

Erratum to: Mindfulness in Daily Life: a Multidimensional Approach

Appendix C Discussion Questions for Student Debriefing: Module 3

Kim L. Gratz 2,3,4 and Lizabeth Roemer 2

Jumpstart Mplus 5. Data that are skewed, incomplete or categorical. Arielle Bonneville-Roussy Dr Gabriela Roman

Building Emotional Self-Awareness

Coping with Sexually Transmitted Infections as a Result of Sexual Violence Pandora s Aquarium by Jackie and Kristy

Depression: More than just the blues

Assessing Measurement Invariance in the Attitude to Marriage Scale across East Asian Societies. Xiaowen Zhu. Xi an Jiaotong University.

Depression: Dealing with unhelpful thoughts

Nothing Interests Me: Helping Students Overcome Negative Thoughts for Future Success

VALIDATION OF TWO BODY IMAGE MEASURES FOR MEN AND WOMEN. Shayna A. Rusticus Anita M. Hubley University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

RISK-REWARD ANALYSIS

Description of Measure Purpose This measure is a brief, plain-language, reliable scale measuring the quality of youth program participation.

Constructing a Situation-Based Career Interest Assessment for Junior High School Students and Examining Their Interest Structure.

Healing Trauma Evaluation Year 1 Findings

Research Brief Reliability of the Static Risk Offender Need Guide for Recidivism (STRONG-R)

Measurement of Emotion Dysregulation in Adolescents

The MHSIP: A Tale of Three Centers

Postnatal Depression. Easy read information

Development and Psychometric Properties of the Relational Mobility Scale for the Indonesian Population

Understanding Addiction and the Connections to Safety Decision Making

Restorative Practices in Schools. District Attorney Joseph Early Jr. Safe Schools Summit October 1, 2015

CONFORMITY TO MASCULINE NORMS SCALE 1. Fate of the Total Score: Dimensionality of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory-46 (CMNI-46)

Large Type Fit Indices of Mathematics Adult Learners: A Covariance Structure Model

JUST DIAGNOSED WITH DIABETES?

Executive function, self-regulation, and self-efficacy effects on exercise adherence in older adults

College Student Self-Assessment Survey (CSSAS)

Inferential Statistics

Everything DiSC Manual

Important. Copyright 2016 wrestletowin.com All Rights Reserved

Understanding the relationship between subjective wellbeing and gambling behavior

Using the STIC to Measure Progress in Therapy and Supervision

Relationship between Belief System and Depression with Anxiety among Undergraduate Students in Yemen

UCLA PTSD REACTION INDEX FOR CHLDREN AND ADOLESCENTS DSM-5 Version Page 1 of 9 TRAUMA HISTORY PROFILE

Problem Situation Form for Parents

Depression. Most of the time, people manage to deal with these feelings and get past them with a little time and care.

Measures of children s subjective well-being: Analysis of the potential for cross-cultural comparisons

Buy full version here - for $ 7.00

11 tips for real estate agents with ADHD

Measurement invariance of the strength of motivation for medical school: a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis

Words: 1393 (excluding table and references) Exploring the structural relationship between interviewer and self-rated affective

Addressing Psychometric Limitations of the Difficulties in. Emotion Regulation Scale Through Item Modification

Changes to your behaviour

Mastering Emotions. 1. Physiology

Allegany Rehabilitation Associates Personalized Recovery Oriented Services. PROS Service: CRS Wellness Self-Management Coping Skill Training

PROBLEM GAMBLING SYMPTOMATOLOGY AND ALCOHOL MISUSE AMONG ADOLESCENTS

ID: Test Date: 05/14/2018 Name: Sample N. Student Rater Name: Self. Birth Date: 05/18/1999 Age: 18:11 Year in. Enrollment: Full-Time

11 Validity. Content Validity and BIMAS Scale Structure. Overview of Results

Ingredients of Difficult Conversations

Applications of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in Humanities and Science Researches

Updating Problem Gambling Prevalence in Italy

Understanding and Building Emotional Resilience

keep track of other information like warning discuss with your doctor, and numbers of signs for relapse, things you want to

A General Procedure to Assess the Internal Structure of a Noncognitive Measure The Student360 Insight Program (S360) Time Management Scale

Hanne Søberg Finbråten 1,2*, Bodil Wilde-Larsson 2,3, Gun Nordström 3, Kjell Sverre Pettersen 4, Anne Trollvik 3 and Øystein Guttersrud 5

Quality of Life in Epilepsy for Adolescents: QOLIE-AD-48 (Version 1)

An Acceptance-Based Emotion Regulation Group Therapy for Deliberate Self-Harm

Understanding Your Own Grief Journey. Information for Teens

Personality Traits Effects on Job Satisfaction: The Role of Goal Commitment

Structural Equation Modeling of Multiple- Indicator Multimethod-Multioccasion Data: A Primer

Stress & Mood Management. Managing Anxiety and Panic. Course Slides. Keeping Yourself Safe

Identifying Your Problematic Thoughts

Section 7 Assessment. CAT 1 - Background Knowledge Probe. Carol Donlon EDAE 590. Colorado State University. Dr. Jeff Foley

3 CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF STATISTICS

Assessing hyperactivation and deactivation strategies of the caregiving behavioral

EMOTION CARDS. Introduction and Ideas. How Do You Use These Cards?

Interconnectedness - The key to personal and collective well-being

Moving beyond regression toward causality:

My Father Has a Mood. Disorder

Lab 4: Alpha and Kappa. Today s Activities. Reliability. Consider Alpha Consider Kappa Homework and Media Write-Up

Handling Emotionally Charged Customers with Empathic Listening

Instrument equivalence across ethnic groups. Antonio Olmos (MHCD) Susan R. Hutchinson (UNC)

Measuring mathematics anxiety: Paper 2 - Constructing and validating the measure. Rob Cavanagh Len Sparrow Curtin University

Validation of an Arabic Version of the ORWELL97 Questionnaire in Adults with Obesity

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis of a Mathematics Placement Test

The Helping Orientations Inventory Open Materials 1

Description and Psychometrics

1. Family context. a) Positive Disengaged

USF Mood & Anxiety Disorders Program

Reliability Analysis: Its Application in Clinical Practice

Week 8 Hour 1: More on polynomial fits. The AIC. Hour 2: Dummy Variables what are they? An NHL Example. Hour 3: Interactions. The stepwise method.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Major Depression Inventory at the Kenyan Coast

Factorial Validity and Consistency of the MBI-GS Across Occupational Groups in Norway

Transcription:

PSYC 948: Latent Trait Measurement and Structural Equation Modeling Homework #7 (Total 10 Points) Due: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 at 11:59pm. Homework Problems: The homework problems are based a simulated data set mimicking the properties of data collected using the Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (Gratz & Roemer, 2004): Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and disregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41-54. A total of 36 items were administered to 490 participants (with no missing values for this assignment). The DERS scale was developed to measure six factors: Nonacceptance of emotional responses (6 items) Difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors (5 items) Impulse control difficulties (6 items) Lack of emotional awareness (6 items) Lack of access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items) Lack of emotional clarity (5 items) The items of the DERS, separated by the factors they were written to measure, can be found at the end of this assignment. Each item used a Likert-type response format where responses were coded as follows: 1 = Almost Never (1=10%) 2 = Sometimes (11-35%) 3 = About Half the Time (36-65%) 4 = Most of the Time (66-90%) 5 = Almost always (91-100%) All reverse-worded items were scored accordingly and are in the appropriate direction in the data set. The set of analyses for this assignment will mimic those done when building a multi-factor scale. For all analyses, use the MLR estimator in Mplus. Unidimensional Models 1. Run a single-factor model and assessing the fit of the nonacceptance of emotional responses items. Your model log-likelihood should be -3,389.763. Be sure to report model Chi Square test, RMSEA, CFI, TLI, and SRMR. Also, report the standardized factor loadings and the model R-Square for each item. Does the single factor model fit well? (.5 points) 2. Run a single-factor model and assessing the fit of the difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors items. Your model log-likelihood should be -3,208.596. Be sure to report model Chi Square test, RMSEA, CFI, TLI, and SRMR. Also, report the standardized factor loadings and the model R-Square for each item. Does the single factor model fit well? (.5 points)

3. Run a single-factor model and assessing the fit of the impulse control difficulties items. Your model loglikelihood should be -2,775.839. Be sure to report model Chi Square test, RMSEA, CFI, TLI, and SRMR. Also, report the standardized factor loadings. Also, report the standardized factor loadings and the model R-Square for each item. Does the single factor model fit well? (.5 points) 4. Run a single-factor model and assessing the fit of the lack of emotional awareness. Your model loglikelihood should be -3,677.483. Be sure to report model Chi Square test, RMSEA, CFI, TLI, and SRMR. Also, report the standardized factor loadings. Also, report the standardized factor loadings and the model R-Square for each item. Does the single factor model fit well? (.5 points) 5. Run a single-factor model and assessing the fit of the lack of access to emotion regulation strategies items. Your model log-likelihood should be -4,730.420. Be sure to report model Chi Square test, RMSEA, CFI, TLI, and SRMR. Also, report the standardized factor loadings and the model R-Square for each item. Does the single factor model fit well? (.5 points) 6. Run a single-factor model and assessing the fit of the lack of emotional clarity items. Your model loglikelihood should be -2,850.645. Be sure to report model Chi Square test, RMSEA, CFI, TLI, and SRMR. Also, report the standardized factor loadings and the model R-Square for each item. Does the single factor model fit well? (.5 points) Multidimensional Models As the unidimensional models mostly fit (or should have mostly fit), the next step is to combine them into a multi-factor model. The next questions do that and then assess the fit of the multi-factor model to the data. 7. Run a six-factor model where all six factors are estimated simultaneously. Your model log-likelihood should be -20,252.926. Be sure to report model Chi Square test, RMSEA, CFI, TLI, and SRMR. Does the six-factor model fit well? (1 point) 8. Run a one-factor model on all 36 items as a baseline model. Your model log-likelihood should be - 21,558.054. Conduct a MLR rescaled likelihood ratio test comparing the fit of the one-factor model to the six-factor model. State which model is the null model and which is the alternative model. Which model is preferred? (1 point) 9. Starting with the six-factor model, add a method factor that (a) measures all reverse coded items (so these items will measure more than one factor) and (b) is uncorrelated with all other factors (you can do this by setting these covariances to zero. Your log-likelihood should be -20,113.330. Using an MLRrescaled likelihood ratio test, compare the fit of this model to that of the six-factor model from Question #8. State which model is the null model and which is the alternative model. Which model is preferred? (1 point) 10. From the six-plus-method-factor model, report the goodness of fit indices. Be sure to report model Chi Square test, RMSEA, CFI, TLI, and SRMR. Does the six-plus-method-factor model fit well? (.5 points) Although the model fit was suspect, we will continue with this analysis based on the RMSEA value giving us acceptable fit.

Higher Order Factor Models 11. Create a higher-order factor named emotional regulation that is measured by the six factors of the DERS (but not the reverse coded method factor) using the six-plus-method-factor model. Your log-likelihood should be -20,229.181. Using an MLR-rescaled likelihood ratio test, compare the fit of this model to that of the six-factor model from Question #9. State which model is the null model and which is the alternative model. Which model is preferred? (.5 points) Results Interpretation 12. Report the factor correlation matrix from the model preferred from Question #11. Does one factor not appear to have a higher correlation than the other factors? (1 point) 13. Report the (omega) model-based reliability for a sum score for each of the seven factors of the scale. (1 point) 14. Report the reliability for the factor scores for each of the seven factors of the scale. (1 point) Submission Instructions: All homework and final answers must be your own and not be copied or paraphrased from anyone else s answers. Homework must be submitted via email (jtemplin@unl.edu) in the form of Microsoft Word document with the name: 948_FirstLast_HW#.docx. Late homework will have a penalty of 10% per calendar day.

Item Nonacceptance of Emotional Responses 11. When I m upset, I become angry with myself for feeling that way. 12. When I m upset, I become embarrassed for feeling that way. 21. When I'm upset, I feel ashamed with myself for feeling that way. 23. When I'm upset, I feel like I am weak. 25. When I'm upset, I feel guilty for feeling that way. 29. When I'm upset, I become irritated with myself for feeling that way. Difficulties in Engaging in Goal-Directed Behaviors 13. When I m upset, I have difficulty getting work done. 18. When I'm upset, I have difficulty focusing on other things. 20. When I'm upset, I can still get things done. (R) 26. When I'm upset, I have difficulty concentrating. 33. When I'm upset, I have difficulty thinking about anything else. Impulse Control Difficulties 3. I experience my emotions as overwhelming and out of control. 14. When I m upset, I become out of control. 19. When I'm upset, I feel out of control. 24. When I'm upset, I feel like I can remain in control of my behaviors. (R) 27. When I'm upset, I have difficulty controlling my behaviors. 32. When I'm upset, I lose control over my behaviors. Lack of Emotional Awareness 2. I pay attention to how I feel. (R) 6. I am attentive to my feelings. (R) 8. I care about what I am feeling. (R) 10. When I m upset, I acknowledge my emotions. (R) 17. When I'm upset, I believe that my feelings are valid and important. (R) 34. When I'm upset, I take time to figure out what I'm really feeling. (R)

Limited Access to Emotion Regulation Strategies 15. When I'm upset, I believe that I will remain that way for a long time. 16. When I'm upset, I believe that I'll end up feeling very depressed. 22. When I'm upset, I know that I can find a way to eventually feel better. (R) 28. When I'm upset, I believe there is nothing I can do to make myself feel better. 30. When I'm upset, I start to feel very bad about myself. 31. When I'm upset, I believe that wallowing in it is all I can do. 35. When I'm upset, it takes me a long time to feel better. 36. When I'm upset, my emotions feel overwhelming. Lack of Emotional Clarity 1. I am clear about my feelings. (R) 4. I have no idea how I am feeling. 5. I have difficulty making sense out of my feelings. 7. I know exactly how I am feeling. (R) 9. I am confused about how I feel.