KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, WASHINGTON STATE CAUSE NO SEA

Similar documents
If you sought health insurance coverage or benefits from MAGNETIC STIMULATION ( TMS )

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

State of Connecticut Department of Education Division of Teaching and Learning Programs and Services Bureau of Special Education

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Parent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement

Exhibit 2 RFQ Engagement Letter

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY NO. COME NOW Plaintiffs by and through their attorneys of record J.

Healthy Michigan Dental Plan Handbook

MEMBER GRIEVANCE/COMPLAINT FORM. Address City State Zip Code

NOTICE OF RIGHTS OF STUDENTS AND PARENTS UNDER SECTION 504

OUTPATIENT SERVICES PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES CONTRACT

About this consent form. Why is this research study being done? Partners HealthCare System Research Consent Form

COMMUNITY HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES

Case 2:16-cv JCC Document 1 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 16

PUBLIC HOUSING: THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND MEDICAID WAIVERS: APPEALS, COMPLAINTS, AND GRIEVANCES

APPLICATION FOR CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES NON PUBLIC ASSISTANCE APPLICANT/RECIPIENT

PSYCHOLOGIST-PATIENT SERVICES

Issue Alert

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. Case No.: Plaintiffs Tammie Aust, Alison Grennan, Jennifer Schill, and Lang You Mau, by and

Corporate Policies. Corporate Billing and Collection Policy Section:

SECTION 504 NOTICE OF PARENT/STUDENT RIGHTS IN IDENTIFICATION/EVALUATION, AND PLACEMENT

New patients approved for the Novo Nordisk PAP may only be eligible for insulin vials. For a full list of available products, please visit:

Special Education Fact Sheet. Special Education Impartial Hearings in New York City

Washington County-Johnson City Health Department Christen Minnick, MPH, Director 219 Princeton Road Johnson City, Tennessee Phone:

19 TH JUDICIAL DUI COURT REFERRAL INFORMATION

NOTICE OF APPEAL OR PETITION

CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCEDURES

Nevada Pacific Dental. Individual Dental Contract and Evidence of Coverage. Policy Effective Date: January 1, 2013

Case 1:15-cv RBJ Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

TENANT'S GUIDE. City of Oakland Rent Adjustment Program

107 If I have the proofs DTA wanted, should I still ask for a hearing?

CIRCUIT COURT OF DUNN COUNTY LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE PLAN NARRATIVE

MEMBER SHARE A Pastoral Medical Association - Private Membership Program MEMBER SHARE AGREEMENT (MSA)

Z E N I T H M E D I C A L P R O V I D E R N E T W O R K P O L I C Y Title: Provider Appeal of Network Exclusion Policy

5/10/2017 INDEPENDENT EDUCATIONAL EVALUATIONS. What Is an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE)?

WHAT IF MY CASEWORKER WON'T CALL ME BACK?

Commonly asked questions about genetic testing for hereditary cancer

PHILIP R. KIMBALL, as Administrator of the Estate of CARLA M. KIMBALL, Deceased, Plaintiff, vs. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant.

Legal Rights Legal Issues

MEMBER GRIEVANCES AND APPEALS PROCEDURES

How Ofsted regulate childcare

AFFILIATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT

The. What-if? Workbook. How to Make Decisions About Your Mental Health Treatment. Ahead of Time. w i t h a d va n c e d i r e c t i v e s

Baa Hózhó Navajo Prep Math Summer Camp 2017

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

Grant Application for Individuals

LUNG CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS

Illinois Supreme Court. Language Access Policy

SmileNet SM Dental Discount Program

Medical Necessity and the Retrospective Review Process

General Terms and Conditions

About this consent form

Medical gap arrangements - practitioner application

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 H 1 HOUSE BILL 933. Short Title: Informed Consent for HIV/AIDS Testing. (Public)

Rules of Procedure for Screening and Hearing Meetings

Medicaid Denied My Request for Services, Now What?

Personal Disclosure Statement and Notice of Practices

Section 8 Administrative Plan (revised January 2000) Chapter 22 # page 1

How to Ask for a Reasonable Accommodation of Your Disability from the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH)

Home Sleep Test (HST) Instructions

2017 FAQs. Dental Plan. Frequently Asked Questions from employees

Completed applications can be submitted either by mail or to:

IDEA Early Intervention Due Process Complaints and Hearing Requests Part C Procedures

MHN. Benefits from MHN

Non-Executive Member Disciplinary Review Process

RIGHTS OF DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING PEOPLE IN ENTERTAINMENT

October 16, UM 1885 Osprey Solar LLC, Complainant vs. Portland General Electric Company, Defendant

revised anatomical gift act

TACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY

TAXOTERE: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT IT

General Terms and Conditions

METROLINX ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS RULES OF PRACTICE

Grievance Procedure of the Memphis Housing Authority

Dental Options 2018 BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

1. A(n) is someone who has education, profession or specialized experience that qualifies him or her with great knowledge of a certain subject.

MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT: DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES AND DISCLOSURE FORM Plan Contract

Appeal and Grievance Procedure

Notice of Procedural Safeguards. October

ALL DEAF.COM. Lawyer Settles Interpreter Case. April 9, 2004

GOC GUIDANCE FOR WITNESSES IN FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE HEARINGS

Lincoln County School District

Family Tariff. General Tariff Information. Scope of the family referral. Extended Services

PATIENT CARE PROGRAM

After Sexual Assault:

St. Mary s Hospital Foundation Scholarship Program. Deadline: Must be postmarked by March 15, 2016

not you were a victim of sexual abuse, our Mental Health Advisor can help you figure that out.

Please complete the medical history section below so that we can be sure to respond to any

PARTICIPATING GENERAL DENTIST AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Act 443 of 2009 House Bill 1379

Review of National Disability Insurance Scheme Decisions Practice Direction

Action Request Transmittal

Important Information About Your Hearing

Re: Bayer s false and deceptive marketing for its Men s Multis for prevention of cancer

Informed Consent for MINDFULNESS BASED Cognitive Therapy

Dental Plus of Idaho THE POLICY PROVIDES DENTAL BENEFITS ONLY.

Transcription:

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, WASHINGTON STATE CAUSE NO. 11-2-34187-9 SEA ATTENTION: CURRENT AND PRIOR REGENCE BLUESHIELD INSUREDS WHO CURRENTLY REQUIRE, OR HAVE REQUIRED IN THE PAST, SPEECH, OCCUPATIONAL OR PHYSICAL THERAPY TO TREAT NEURODEVELOPMENTAL CONDITIONS A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. O.S.T. et al., v. Regence BlueShield., is a case in which two insureds sued Regence BlueShield. O.S.T. and L.H. brought the case and are called the named Plaintiffs. The lawsuit alleges that Regence violated the Washington State Mental Health Parity Act, breached its contracts with its enrollees, and violated Washington s Consumer Protection Act by excluding and limiting coverage for medically necessary neurodevelopmental therapy for persons diagnosed with certain neurodevelopmental conditions. The trial court issued a decision on December 12, 2012 declaring that Regence s exclusion of neurodevelopmental therapy violates Washington public policy and the Mental Health Parity Act. The Court declared such exclusion void and unenforceable in this case. Regence has appealed from this judgment. The Court has not decided whether an injunction should issue or whether Regence must pay for damages related to its failure to cover medically necessary therapy. There is no money available now and no guarantee that there will be. The purpose of this notice is to explain your legal rights to you. Your legal rights are affected and you have a choice to make now: YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT Stay in this lawsuit. Give up the right to file a separate lawsuit. (1) DO NOTHING If you do nothing you will remain in the Class and you will have the right to present your claims at trial. By doing nothing, you give up any rights to sue Regence separately about the same legal claims in this lawsuit. You will not be responsible for the payment of attorney fees and costs out of your own pocket. If the Class prevails, any court approved fees and costs will either be paid out of the fund generated on behalf of the class or paid separately by Regence. Get out of this lawsuit. Get no benefits from it. Keep the right (2) ASK TO BE EXCLUDED to file a separate lawsuit. If you ask to be excluded and money is later awarded, you will not share in the award. However, you will keep any rights to sue Regence separately about the same legal claims in this lawsuit. Your options are explained in this notice. To ask to be excluded you must act before May 20, 2013. If money is awarded either by the Court or through settlement, you will be notified about how receive a share. - 1 -

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1. Why did I get this notice? 1. Why did I get this notice? Regence s records show that you or your minor child or dependent is or was enrolled in either an individual a health benefit plan insured by Regence, or a group health plan insured by Regence which was not covered by a federal law known as ERISA. Regence s records also show that you or your minor child or dependent may be a class member. You or your minor child or dependent is a class member if one of you meets the following class definition: All individuals who: (1) are, or have been covered under a non-erisa group health plan as that term is defined by RCW 48.43.005(19), that has been or will be delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed on or after January 1, 2006 by Regence BlueShield, a Washington corporation, or and individual health plan as that term is defined by RCW 48.43.005(19), that has been or will be delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed on or after January 1, 2008 by Regence BlueShield, a Washington corporation, and (2) have required or require neurodevelopmental therapy for the treatment of a qualified mental health condition. A qualified mental health conditions is defined as any condition listed in the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( DSM-IV-TR ), other than substance related disorders and life transition problems ( V codes) and diagnostic codes 302 through 302.9. If you are a class member, then this notice explains that the Court has allowed or certified a class action lawsuit that may affect you. You have legal rights and options that you may exercise before the Court holds a trial. If you are unsure whether you are included, you can get free help by calling or writing the Class s lawyers in this case: Eleanor Hamburger Richard E. Spoonemore SIRIANNI YOUTZ SPOONEMORE & HAMBURGER 999 Third Avenue, Suite 3650 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 223-0303 www.sylaw.com ehamburger@sylaw.com 2. What are the allegations against Regence? 2. What are the allegations against Regence? In this lawsuit, Plaintiffs allege that Regence illegally excluded and/or limited coverage of medically necessary neurodevelopmental therapy to treat individuals diagnosed certain neurodevelopmental conditions (specifically, conditions identified in the DSM-IV-TR). Plaintiffs allege that Regence s exclusions and limitations violated the Mental Health Parity Act, breached their health benefit plans and violated Washington s Consumer Protection Act. - 2 -

3. What is a class action and who is involved? 3. What is a class action and who is involved? In a class action lawsuit, one or more people called Class Representatives (in this case, O.S.T. and L.H., both minor children diagnosed with neurodevelopmental conditions) sue on behalf of other people who have similar claims. The people together are a Class or Class Members. All of the Class Members are called the Plaintiffs. Regence BlueShield is called the Defendant. One court resolves the issues for everyone in the Class, except for those people who choose to exclude themselves from the Class.4. 4. Why is the lawsuit a class action? The Court decided that this lawsuit can be a class action because it meets the requirements of Civil Rule 23, which governs class actions in Washington State.5 5. How did Regence respond? Regence denies that its exclusion and limitation of coverage for neurodevelopmental therapy violated any statute, breached its health benefit plans, or violated Washington s Consumer Protection Act. Regence denies that the Class is entitled to any of the relief it seeks.6. Has the Court decided who is 6. Has the Court decided who is right? The Court has ruled that Regence s exclusion of neurodevelopmental therapy violates Washington public policy and the Mental Health Parity Act. The Court declared that under the Mental Health Parity Act, Regence was, and is, required to cover medically necessary neurodevelopmental therapy. The Court has not yet ruled on whether Regence is required to pay damages related to its exclusion or limitation of neurodevelopmental therapy coverage. The Class must prove their damage claims at trial. The trial is scheduled to begin on August 5, 2013. 7. What are the Plaintiffs asking for? The Class is asking the Court to eliminate Regence s exclusionary practices that prevent coverage of medically necessary neurodevelopmental therapy in its individual and non-erisa group health benefit plans. The Class also wants Regence to reimburse class members for all payments for medically necessary therapy made while Regence s exclusionary practices were in place. The Class further seeks damages under the Washington Consumer Protection Act. The Class also seeks its attorneys fees and costs. 8. Is there any money available now? No money is available now because the case has not gone to trial and the two sides have not settled the case. There is no guarantee that money ever will be obtained. If money is obtained, you will be notified how to ask for a share. 9. What happens if I do nothing at all? By doing nothing, you stay in the Class. If you stay in and the Class is awarded money as a result of settlement, you will be notified about how to apply for a share. If you do nothing, however, you will not be able to sue Regence about the same legal claims that are the subject of this lawsuit. Your claims will be decided by the Orders the Court issues and judgments the Court makes in this class action. - 3 -

10. Why would I ask to be excluded? 10. Why would I ask to be excluded? You may ask to be excluded from the lawsuit for any reason. You can ask to be excluded if you do not want to be part of a lawsuit against Regence. If you already have your own lawsuit against Regence for the same claims and want to continue with it, you need to ask to be excluded from the Class. If you exclude yourself from the Class which also means to remove yourself from the Class, and is sometimes called opting out of the Class you will not get any money or benefits from this lawsuit even if the Plaintiffs obtain them as a result of the trial or from any settlement that may or may not be reached between Regence and the Plaintiffs. However, you may then be able to sue or continue to sue Regence for those same claims. In other words, if you exclude yourself from the Class, you will not be legally bound by the Court s decisions in this class action. If you start your own lawsuit against Regence after you exclude yourself, you will have to hire your own lawyer for that lawsuit, and you ll have to prove your claims. If you exclude yourself so you can start or continue your own lawsuit against Regence, you should talk to your own lawyer soon, because your claims may be subject to a statute of limitations.11. 11. How do I ask the Court to exclude me from the Class? To ask to be excluded, you must send an Exclusion or Opt-Out Form by mail, stating that you want to be excluded from O.S.T. et al., v. Regence BlueShield. Be sure to include your name and address and sign the letter. An opt out form is attached to this notice at page 6. You must mail your Exclusion Request postmarked by May 20, 2013, to: O.S.T. Exclusion Request P.O. Box 2934 Seattle, WA 98111 12. Do I have a lawyer in this case? The Court decided that the law firm of Sirianni Youtz Spoonemore & Hamburger is qualified to represent you and all Class Members. The law firm is called the Class Counsel. It is experienced in handling class action lawsuits. More information about the law firm, its practice, and its lawyers experience is available at www.sylaw.com. 13. Should I get my own lawyer? You do not need to hire your own lawyer because Class Counsel is working on your behalf. You may hire your own lawyer and ask him or her to appear in Court for you, if you want someone other than Class Counsel to speak for you. If you do, you will have to pay that lawyer. 14. How will the lawyers be paid? If Class Counsel get money or benefits for the Class, it may ask the Court for fees and expenses. You will not have to pay these fees and expenses. If the Court grants Class Counsel s request, the fees and expenses would either be deducted from any money obtained for the Class in this case or paid separately by Regence. 15. How and when will the Court decide who is right? As long as the case is not resolved by a settlement or otherwise, Class Counsel will have to prove the Class s claims at a trial. The trial date in this case is currently scheduled for August 5, 2013. - 4 -

16. Do I have to come to trial? 16. Do I have to come to trial? Class Counsel will present the case for the Class, and Regence will present its defenses. You and/or your own lawyer are welcome to come to the trial at your own expense. 17. Will I get money after the trial? If the Plaintiffs obtain money as a result of the trial or a settlement, you will be notified about how to participate. We do not know how long this will take. 18. Are more details available? You may visit the website www.sylaw.com, where you will find the Court s Order Certifying the Class, the Complaint that the Plaintiffs submitted, Regence s Answer to the Complaint, and an Exclusion Request form (hard copy also included at page 6). You may also speak to one of the lawyers by calling (206) 223-0303 or by writing to: SIRIANNI YOUTZ SPOONEMORE & HAMBURGER 999 Third Avenue, Suite 3650 Seattle, WA 98104-5 -

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, WASHINGTON STATE CAUSE NO. 11-2-34187-9 SEA EXCLUSION or OPT-OUT FORM This form is to be completed only by those individuals who do NOT wish to remain Class Members and who do NOT want any monetary award that may result from this litigation. Name: Address: First MI Last Number and Street City State Zip Code Date of Birth: Telephone: By signing this Form, I certify that I have read the Notice to Class Members and I understand that: 1. I am removing myself as a member of the Class. 2. I will receive no financial benefit from the Lawsuit. 3. I have a right to pursue claims on my own, with or without my own attorney. 4. I understand that if I opt out, my claims may be affected by the relevant statute of limitations and that I should discuss the statute of limitations with any attorney with whom I consult. Signature: Date: City and State where signed: Please return the completed form postmarked by May 20, 2013 to: O.S.T. Exclusion Request P.O. Box 2934 Seattle, WA 98111-6 -