Sprenger Cattle Co. Angus Bull Sale. Cattle with a Purpose Beyond Performance

Similar documents
Senepol Cattle and Grass Fed Beef. Allen Williams, Ph.D., PAS Tallgrass Beef Company

Expected Progeny Differences (EPD) provide producers

National Western Angus Sale Bulls - January 16, 2019 EPDs As Of: 1/11/2019 Lot # CED BW WW YW RADG SC DOC CEM Milk CWt Marb RE $W / $B

Yearling Angus Bulls Semen Directory. SITZAngus.com Harrison, MT Dillon, MT SITZ Ranch

Bull Genetics: Purebreds, Composites, Full-sibs and Half-sibs

Centralized Ultrasound Processing to Develop Carcass EPD s

Evaluation of Pfizer Animal Genetics HD 50K MVP Calibration

Increasing Profits per Acre with Appropriate Genetics

% Heterosis = [(crossbred average straightbred average) straightbred average] x 100

Gosey Red Angus. Final Bull Sale... Saturday, April 4, :00 pm CDT Gosey Red Angus Headquarters Raymond, Nebraska

National Western Angus Sale Bulls - January 10, 2018

Breed Differences and Heterosis Effects for Carcass and Meat Palatability Traits in an Angus-Brahman Multibreed Cattle Population

THE EFFECT OF BREED GROUP AND AGE AT FEEDING ON BEEF CARCASS COMPOSITION

Using High Accuracy Sires. Dona Goede Livestock Specialist

Genetic Correlations of Fatty Acid Concentrations with Carcass Traits in Angus-Sired Beef Cattle

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXIII December 3, 4 and 5, 2013 Rapid City, South Dakota

Beef Cattle Handbook

- 1 - Embryos for Sale SIRES DAMS. Material on the following pages

(Key Words: Implants, Holstein, Tenderness, Yields, Beef.)

From genetic to phenotypic trends

Chapter 9 Heritability and Repeatability

Impact of Body Weight Gain During Stocker/Backgrounding on Feedyard Performance and Carcass Traits Galen E Erickson University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Using Real-Time Ultrasound During the Feeding Period to Predict Cattle Composition.

Relationships between temperament, carcass traits and tenderness in Santa Gertrudis steers

Mc Cumber Angus Ranch

Health of Finishing Steers: Effects on Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Tenderness

Predicting Tenderness in Beef Carcasses by Combining Ultrasound and Mechanical Techniques

Adkins gelbvieh Gelbvieh &balancer performance genetics

Ethanol Co-products Beef Quality Implications

Effect of Glycerol Level in Feedlot Finishing Diets on Animal Performance V.L. Anderson and B.R. Ilse NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTAL VITAMIN D 3 ON MEAT TENDERNESS 1

Evaluation of Condition Scoring of Feeder Calves as a Tool for Management and Nutrition

Beef Grading. Dr. Gretchen Hilton Assistant Professor Meat Judging Team Coach

Carcass Terminology. Goal (learning objective) Supplies. Pre-lesson preparation. Lesson directions and outline

Can We Allow a Calf to Have a Bad Day? Dr. Matt Hersom UF/IFAS Department of Animal Sciences

INTERACTIONS OF MANAGEMENT AND DIET ON FINAL MEAT CHARACTERISTICS OF BEEF ANIMALS

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle September 11 and 12, 2007, Billings, Montana IMPROVING COWHERD REPRODUCTION VIA GENETICS

Sunday, January 28, 2018

BW 87 lbs 205 Wt Wt --- BW EPD +2.8 WW EPD +14 YW EPD +31 Milk EPD +7 TM EPD +14 CED EPD -1.0 CEM EPD +1.0 Stay EPD +10 HPG EPD +9.

Live Animal Evaluation Using Linear Measurement Produced by Laurel Hoffman

Why Meat Judging? Assuring Quality Care for Animals Signature Program In-Service Lyda G. Garcia, PhD 9 November 2015

Scott Speidel Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University

EFFECTS OF BREED OF SIRE AND AGE-SEASON OF FEEDING ON MUSCLE TENDERNESS IN THE BEEF CHUCK

CUSTOM MINERAL MIXES: ARE THEY FEASIBLE?

Deer Valley Farm First Focused on the Future Embryo Auction

harvest select Sunday, November 6, 2016 At the ranch in Miller, Nebraska 1:00 pm (ct)

FACTORS INFLUENCING INTERMUSCULAR FAT DEPOSITION IN THE BEEF CHUCK

2016 Commercial Steer Study Guide

Meat Standards Australia Breeding for Improved MSA Compliance & Increased MSA Index Values

IMPLANT EFFECTS ON CARCASS COMPOSITION AND MEAT QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY DIET

BEEFMAKER SEMEN DIRECTORY WHITE HAWK RANCH

Tom s 20 Questions to Determine Where Your Herd is T.P. Tylutki PhD Dpl ACAN AMTS LLC

Overview of Animal Breeding

Body Condition Scoring Your Cow Herd

The effects of corn silage feeding level on steer growth performance, feed intake and carcass composition.

2018 Innovative Grazing Forum

Robert E. Taylor Memorial Symposium Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle Fort Collins, CO December 2-3, 2

2019 Commercial Steer Study Guide

Management of Optaflexx in Feedlots that Sort Cattle Prior to Market

Genetic analysis of the growth rate of Israeli Holstein calves

Meat Standards Australia (MSA), an eating quality

Body Condition Scoring Beef Cows

Evaluating the Effects of Diet Energy Density on Hereford Steer Performance with Differing Genetic Potential for Dry Matter Intake

BEEF QUALITY AND YIELD GRADING D. R. ZoBell, D. Whittier, and Lyle Holmgren

Use and Added Value of AI Data for Genetic Evaluation and Dairy Cattle Improvement

Effects of genetic type and protein levels on growth of swine

SUPPORTS BEEF PRODUCTION FROM START TO STEAK KEEPING AN EYE ON A HEALTHY BOTTOM LINE. Stocker / Feeder Industry

Relationship Between Carcass End Points and USDA Marbling Quality Grades: A Progress Report

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE FEEDING LEVEL ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY

Nutritional effects 011 carcass quality Darryl Gibb, 1997

Heterosis Made Easy

Special Report 274 Agricultural Experiment Station

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

SUMMARY: This document makes amendments to the United States Standards for Grades of

Utah State Jr. Livestock Show Knowledge Test 2017 Senior. Name: County: Score:

Sunday, January 27, 2019

Beef Cattle Handbook

Meat Standards Australia Breeding for Improved MSA Compliance & Increased MSA Index Values

OVULATION RESULTS FROM CATTLE HERDS WITH HIGH TWINNING FREQUENCY. C.A. MORRIS and A.M. DAY

AL Van Eenennaam University of California, Davis. MM Rolf Kansas State University. BP Kinghorn University of New England, NSW, Australia

EVALUATION OF ULTRASOUND AND OTHER SOURCES OF INFORMATION TO PREDICT BEEF CARCASS TRAITS AND FINAL CARCASS VALUE. A Dissertation DUSTIN TYLER DEAN

A Summary of Iowa Cattle Market Data

EFFECTS OF ENERGY INTAKE LEVEL DURING THE GROWING PHASE ON FEEDLOT STEER PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS COMPOSITION

Carcass and meat palatability breed differences and heterosis effects in an Angus-Brahman

Kansas City, Missouri December 2017

Volume 2, Issue 1 January 2008

5/16/2014. Why is the fetal stage so important for beef cattle? Can Cow Nutrition Affect Performance, Quality and Palatability of Its Calf?

Effect of rate of body weight gain of steers during the stocker phase. II. Visceral organ mass and body composition of growing-finishing beef cattle

Growth and pubertal development in Brahman-, Boran-, Tuli-, Belgian Blue-, Hereford- and Angus-sired F1 bulls 1,2

Forage analysis. Using it to design a supplementation program Tri-State Beef Conference

Performance of Beef Calves Provided Molasses-Based Creep Supplements

CHAPTER 1: ANIMAL ECOLOGY AND FORAGING BEHAVIOR... 1

Developing a mineral program: combining the art and the science. Mary Drewnoski, Beef Systems Specialist, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Sire HARB High Plains 975. Sire Hyline Right Time 338. Sire SA Custer

*LX EDWARD ALBERT LUGO, MASTER'S THESIS. fulfillment of the. submitted in partial. requirements for the degree MASTER OP SCIENCE

PROPOSED BEEF CATTLE MANURE EXCRETION AND CHARACTERISTICS STANDARD FOR ASAE

Estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values for New Zealand and Australian Angus cattle

Statistical Indicators E-34 Breeding Value Estimation Ketose

INCREASING PERFORMANCE OF GROWING CATTLE AFTER WEANING USING COTTONSEED AND COTTONSEED MEAL SUPPLEMENTS

Feeding the Suckler Cow by Siobhan Kavanagh, Mark McGee, Liam Fitzgerald

Transcription:

Sprenger Cattle Co. Angus Bull Sale Cattle with a Purpose Beyond Performance Selling 8 Top Cut 2 Year Old Bulls, 20 Top Cut Yearling Bulls and 4 Herd Sires from Bolze Ranch Angus, Wednesday, June 20, 2012 at the Ranch in Sidney, Nebraska 1:00 MST

Cattle with a Purpose Beyond Performance Sprenger Cattle Co is an Angus seedstock operation owned and operated by Brian and Kari Sprenger. Our home is in the high plains region of western Nebraska near Sidney. Our cows are managed in a lower input environment often alongside our commercial cows. The cows are expected to graze year round on native range and or crop residue. The only supplement they receive besides mineral is in the form of protein at necessary times in the year. The cows and heifers are expected to deliver a calf unassisted beginning in May and wean a quality calf, without creep feed, in late November or early December. We do not chase numbers, and we do not chase size. We have sought out cattle with a moderate frame with adequate milk, adequate growth and adequate performance. Due to our desire to maintain a cow herd with these attributes we have chosen to not subscribe to the bull of the month club. Instead, we have identified a select group of cows within our herd that we are using sons out of to propagate the form that works in our environment. Recent Expansion In December of 2010 we expanded our herd with the leasing of the Bolze Angus Ranch cow herd. The Bolze Ranch Angus cow herd has resulted from 30 years of intensive AI mating s to proven bulls that excel in the preweaning traits including moderation of BW for direct calving ease plus maternal calving ease, moderate growth (frame score 4-5 mature cows weighing 1150-1250 #), moderate milk, fleshing ability with minimal supplementation, good feet and legs as well as udder quality. Carcass traits receive lower priority with emphasis on moderate carcass size, ribeye area per unit of carcass weight, marbling and percent retail product. The Maternal Side of the Equation The goals of our programs have been set in stone for quite some time. We believe that we must maintain our focus on the Maternal traits in our cow herds as they are the Heart and Soul of the ranch. To this, we feel that there are more traits to consider than milk EPD s when talking about Maternal Traits. Traits such as fertility, calving ease, fleshing ability with minimal supplementation, sound feet and legs, disposition, maternal instinct at calving and adequate milk production. All of these traits lend themselves to cow longevity which is a key component to reducing our costs of inputs. We feel that the race for increased performance in both growth and carcass traits has adversely affected these conveniences that so many have taken for granted. It has been our objective to select our own seedstock with these traits in mind. We have chosen to select bulls out of cows with a proven track record to excel in Maternal Traits. For sale this Spring are bulls out of: B R Sustain 4197 229 603 Reg. # 15574436 EPD Profile BW 1.9 WW 44 YW 75 Milk 21 6 year old bull out of a younger cow with generational proof of Maternal performance and sired by Pinebank Waigroup 41/97. B R Sustainable 4197 008 617 Reg. # 15574441 EPD Profile BW 3.1 WW 33 YW 62 Milk 18 6 year old bull out of a the 008 cow who is still in production today. The cow calved this year in BCS 6 clothes and carried an impeccable udder at 12 years of age and sired by Pinebank Waigroup 41/97. JJJ Pinebank 822 Reg. # 16019628 EPD Profile BW.4 WW 34 YW 53 Milk 19 4 year old bull from the Octoraro Angus herd in Pennsylvania via J Bob Hould at Havre Montana. 822 s mother was born from a 16 year old cow Octoraro Delia 723 and sired by Pinebank Waigroup 41/97.

Pinebank Waigroup 152/04 Reg. # 15789169 EPD Profile BW -.9 WW 32 YW 52 Milk 4 Outcross genetics from the Pinebank Stud in New Zealand. His dam is 15 years old and the top indexing cow in the Pinebank herd. Hyland Frank the Tank Reg. # 15528663 EPD Profile BW. -.9 WW 18 YW 40 Milk 0 Good old fashioned, maternally oriented Angus bull built to function on forage. The starting bid on all bulls will be $2000 2 Year olds. (Udder, Disposition and Ease graded 1-5, 5 being the best.) Num Act. BW BW Act. WW WW Act. YW YW MK Dam Sire Udder Dis. Ease 2Yr WT 001 OR 74 2.0 N/A 31 1117 49 14 7597 822 4 5 3 003 OR 93 1.8 N/A 30 1122 47 13 7288 822 5 5 2 005 OR 67.8 N/A 31 965 48 15 819 822 4 4 4 009 OR 84.6 N/A 28 1098 48 18 816 822 5 4 4 010 OR 72.1 N/A 30 1110 47 15 813 822 5 5 4 014 OR 79 2.0 N/A 24 1050 37 12 A74 310 3 5 2 016 OR 68.6 N/A 30 1015 49 17 719 822 3 5 4 017 OR 90 1.0 N/A 31 1227 48 7 615 152/04 5 4 2 Yearlings Act.YW 103 BK 71 2.2 514 32 854 61 17 008 603/617 4 5 3 110 BK 80 N/A 458 N/A 836 N/A N/A 327 603/617 5 5 3 116 OR 87 1.0 489 24 759 43 5.0 042 FTT 4 5 3 116 BK 73 1.7 466 25 830 53 15 343 603/617 4 5 4 118 OR 73 0.0 472 22 820 42 8.0 719 FTT 3 4 4 119 BK 88 2.3 572 28 906 53 15 414 603/617 3 4 3 122 BK 97 2.4 613 29 956 55 15 437 603/617 3 5 2 123 BK 78 2.2 540 32 890 58 17 449 603/617 3 5 3 125 BK 86 1.5 470 31 823 59 15 505 603/617 3 5 3 129 BK 86 1.3 535 30 906 56 15 518 603/617 4 3 3 130 OR 79 N/A 437 N/A 766 N/A N/A 702 MS 41 3 5 2 135 BK 88 2.4 567 29 951 57 19 549 603/617 4 5 2 139 OR 84 N/A 487 N/A 806 N/A N/A 809 MS 130 3 5 3 145 BK 77 2.8 463 31 800 56 17 624 603/617 5 4 3 148 BK 78.9 526 27 796 53 17 630 603/617 4 5 4 151 OR 77-2.5 500 28 821 43 14 635 BOV 4 5 4 175 BK 85 1.4 482 26 853 50 15 728 603/617 4 5 3 Mature Bulls 603 BK 1.9 44 75 21 229 41/97 617 BK 3.1 33 62 18 008 41/97 806 BK 1.0 30 54 15 11 41/97 Flush brother to 808 808 BK 1.0 30 54 15 11 41/97 Flush brother to 806

Ultrasound Data collected by Mike Leishman with Rose Canyon L.L.C. Weight REA REA/CWT RES IMF BF Stress Tend OO1 OR 820 7.28 0.89 0.48 3.12 0.08 10 24 2 YR OO3 OR 840 7.45 0.89 0.41 3.00 0.06 10 25 2 YR OO5 OR 740 5.15 0.70 0.41 2.63 0.07 10 25 2 YR O14 OR 866 7.65 0.88 0.58 3.02 0.06 10 24 2 YR O16 OR 800 8.43 1.05 0.54 3.45 0.08 10 26 2 YR O17 OR 970 8.24 0.85 0.45 3.75 0.10 10 24 2 YR 103 BK 595 6.62 1.11 0.56 2.14 0.07 10 25 1 YR 110 BK 568 6.57 1.16 0.33 2.31 0.07 10 24 1 YR 116 OR 543 6.34 1.17 0.43 3.05 0.08 10 25 1 YR 116 BK 561 7.11 1.27 0.40 1.78 0.06 10 25 1 YR 118 OR 562 7.67 1.37 0.53 1.91 0.06 10 24 1 YR 119 BK 658 7.42 1.13 0.49 2.10 0.09 10 25 1 YR 122 BK 684 7.83 1.14 0.47 2.32 0.08 10 24 1 YR 125 BK 547 7.15 1.31 0.41 3.53 0.09 10 24 1 YR 129 BK 629 6.50 1.03 0.45 2.54 0.07 10 24 1 YR 130 OR 546 5.46 1.00 0.45 1.68 0.08 10 24 1 YR 135 BK 673 9.32 1.38 0.42 2.10 0.10 10 25 1 YR 139 OR 564 6.96 1.23 0.55 2.54 0.06 10 25 1 YR 145 BK 566 7.06 1.25 0.44 3.18 0.10 10 24 1 YR 148 BK 578 6.17 1.07 0.44 3.15 0.08 10 24 1 YR 151 OR 584 6.59 1.13 0.44 3.38 0.10 10 24 1 YR 175 BK 604 8.41 1.39 0.46 2.40 0.09 10 24 1 YR 123 BK 622 5.86 0.94 0.46 3.53 0.07 10 24 1 YR Thank you for taking the time to look at our program. We are very excited about the upcoming sale. We will be using a silent auction format. This a very laid back type of sale, just the way we like it. Lunch will be available at noon. For anyone not able to make it to the sale we will do anything we can to provide you with a bull that you would like. Bids can be placed with Ron or myself. We look forward to seeing you in June.

Beef Image Analysis (BIA) Ultrasound BIA live animal carcass ultrasound is an automated, chuteside software system that captures images and calculates trait measurements on an objective basis. The traits determined by BIA ultrasound software are: Ribeye Area (REA), Backfat Thickness (BF), Ribeye Area/Hundred lbs Live Weight (REA/CWT), Percent Intramuscular Fat (% IMF), Ribeye Shape Score (RES), Stress Score (SS), and Tenderness Score (TEND). Tallgrass Beef Company Optimum Ranges Harvest Age Animal: REA = 10-15 BF = 0.2 0.4 in. (At Yearling Ultrasound) BF = 0.4 0.65 in (At Harvest) REA/CWT = 1.0 1.5 (At Yearling Ultrasound) REA/CWT = 1.5 2.0 (At Harvest Dressed Weight Basis) % IMF >= 3.5% + (USDA High Select or better) RES >= 0.35 + SS = <=20 TEND = <=25 QG = High Select High Choice YG = <=3.9 HCWT = 650 850 lbs Code Explanation: RES = Ribeye Shape Score. Indicative of desired shape of the ribeye muscle. Correlated to eventual Yield Grade, Cutability, and % Retail Product. Score ranges from 0.0 to 1.0. Acceptable score is 0.35 or greater in yearling bulls, with an ideal score being 0.45 or better. Ideal score in heifers is 0.35 or better, with acceptable scores of 0.30 or better. SS = Stress Score. Correlated to immune system strength of calf. Score ranges from 10-50. 10=No Stress, 20=Slight Stress, 30=Slightly Moderate Stress, 40=Moderate Stress, 50=Severe Stress. Impacts DTF, ADG, WDA, TCOG, Health Costs, QG, and YG. Ideal score is 2.0 or less. TEND = Tenderness Score. Correlated to actual Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (WB) in carcass ribeye steak at 12 th rib location. Correlation Coefficients between WB and TEND currently average 0.85 0.87. Score ranges from 10-50. 10=Very Tender, 20=Tender, 30=Slightly Tender, 40=Slightly Tough, 50=Tough. Ideal score is 25 or less. Acceptable score in yearling bulls is 28 or less.