A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

Similar documents
Mandibular Protraction Appliance IV

An estimated 25-30% of all orthodontic patients can benefit from maxillary

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

The Tip-Edge appliance and

A Novel Method of Altering the Buccal Segment Relationship

Nonextraction Management of Class II Malocclusion Using Powerscope: A Case Report

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

Intraoral molar-distalization appliances that

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

CLASS II CORRECTION SIMPLIFIED

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

eral Maxillary y Molar Distalization with Sliding Mechanics: Keles Slider

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

We Give Back. Reduce Emergency Visits! ATTACHMENTS. No More Poking Archwires! Crimpable Mini Stops. Tooth Tone Crimpable Mini Stops

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

The management of impacted

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

Integrative Orthodontics with the Ribbon Arch By Larry W. White, D.D.S., M.S.D.

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Focus on Functional Appliances

Non extraction treatment of growing skeletal class II malocclusion with Forsus Fatigue Resistant Appliance- A Case Report

Correction of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion by Fixed Functional Class II Corrector Appliance: Case Report

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

Treatment of a Patient with Class I Malocclusion and Severe Tooth Crowding Using Invisalign and Fixed Appliances

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

Molar distalisation with skeletal anchorage

Case Report Unilateral Molar Distalization: A Nonextraction Therapy

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

Applicability of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device as a Class II Corrector in Young Adults

Angle Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary dental protrusion and missing mandibular first molars*

New Class of Appliance

Use of a Tip-Edge Stage-1 Wire to Enhance Vertical Control During Straight Wire Treatment: Two Case Reports

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

ortho case report Sagittal First international magazine of orthodontics By Dr. Luis Carrière Special Reprint

FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCES

INCLUDES: OVERVIEW ON CLINICAL SITUATIONS FREQUENTLY ENCOUNTERED IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENTS MECHANOTHERAPY USED TO RESOLVE THESE SITUATIONS

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCES

Management of Severe Class II Malocclusion with Fixed Functional Appliance: Forsus

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

TransForce 2. Arch Developer Appliances Clinical Cases. New Horizons In Orthodontics

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Canine Extrusion Technique with SmartClip Self-Ligating Brackets

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Flip-Lock HERBST Appliance COMFORT. CUSTOMIZATION. ADVANCED ENGINEERING.

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

Transverse malocclusion, posterior crossbite and severe discrepancy*

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

THE MBT VERSATILE+ APPLIANCE SYSTEM

MOLAR DISTALIZATION WITH MODIFIED GRAZ IMPLANT SUPPORTED PENDULUM SPRINGS. A CASE REPORT.

INDICATIONS. Fixed Appliances are indicated when precise tooth movements are required

Skeletal Anchorage for Orthodontic Correction of Severe Maxillary Protrusion after Previous Orthodontic Treatment

Crowding and protrusion treated by unusual extractions

Anchorage system. tomas / Sets Page 270 tomas / Pins Page 271 Instruments and accessories Page 273 Patient consultation material Page 282

04 Inserting the HYCON TUBE

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

clinical orthodontics article

#39 Ortho-Tain, Inc

An Innovative Treatment Approach with Atypical Orthodontic Extraction Pattern in Bimaxillary Protrusion Case

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper Corrections of Class II division 1 Malocclusions

AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC BOARD

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

System Orthodontic Treatment Program By Dr. Richard McLaughlin, Dr. John Bennett and Dr. Hugo Trevisi

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

The practice of orthodontics is faced with new

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

One of the most common orthodontic A COMPARISON OF TWO MAXILLARY MOLAR DISTALIZING APPLIANCES WITH THE DISTAL JET

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

Angle Class I malocclusion with anterior open bite treated with extraction of permanent teeth

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Orthodontics (Ort) #910 Orthodontic Technique Lab Course Director: Dr. Brian Preston Instructor: Brian D. Willison CDT

Fixed appliances II. Dr. Káldy Adrienn, Semmeweis University

Orthodontic cases involving the extraction

Fixed Twin Blocks. Guidelines for case selection are similar to those for removable Twin Block appliances.

Effects of a three-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch

HYCON DEVICE: A PRECISE AND CONTROLLED METHOD OF SPACE CLOSURE A CASE REPORT

Molar anchorage loss has been shown to occur

THE JASPER JUMPER APPLIANCE; USAGE, EFFECTS AND RECENT MODIFICATIONS

Expansion/Arch Development

Orthodontic mini-implants have revolutionized

Impressions CLINICAL. Dr. Damon on The New Damon. Dr. Awbrey on The Bite Fixer. Dr. Scott on The Orthos Solution. a Message from Dr.

Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; June 2014: Vol.-3, Issue- 3, P

Treatment of a malocclusion characterized

The Inman Aligner. The Inman Aligner,* a versatile removable

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

Unilateral Horizontally Impacted Maxillary Canine and First Premolar Treated with a Double Archwire Technique

Nonextraction Treatment of Upper Canine Premolar Transposition in an Adult Patient

Condyle/glenoid fossa changes of Class II patients treated with the edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition period

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Transcription:

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction WILLIAM VOGT, DDS Fixed devices are increasingly being used for molar distalization in Class II treatment because they eliminate the need for special patient compliance. These appliances fall into two main categories: intra-arch (such as the Distal Jet,* Jones Jig,* and Hilgers Pendulum**) and interarch (such as the Herbst*** and active springs). The spring appliances can be further divided into cantilever types (such as the Jasper Jumper* and Bite Fixer**) and telescoping types (such as the Eureka Spring**** and Twin Force ). Recently, two new fixed interarch spring devices have been introduced for Class II correction: the Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring (a cantilever spring) and the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (a telescoping spring). This article describes the use of the Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring (Fig. 1). Appliance Design The flat nickel titanium spring attaches to the maxillary molar bands with an attached pin- Fig. 1 Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring (photograph 2002 3M Unitek). *American Orthodontics, 1714 Cambridge Ave., Sheboygan, WI 53082. **Ormco/ A Company, 1717 W. Collins Ave., Orange, CA 92867. ***Dentaurum, Inc., 10 Pheasant Run, Newtown, PA 18940. ****Eureka Springs, 1312 Garden St., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401. Trademark of Ortho Organizers, Inc., 1619 S. Rancho Santa Fe Road, San Marcos, CA 92069. Trademark of 3M Unitek, 2724 S. Peck Road, Monrovia, CA 91016. The Nitinol Flat Spring is also sold as the Ribbon Jumper by American Orthodontics, 1714 Cambridge Ave., Sheboygan, WI 53082. Fig. 2 Link n Loop assembly allows wider range of motion and keeps pin from being swallowed (photograph 2002 3M Unitek). Fig. 3 Bayonet bends distal to canines act as forward stops and allow springs to clear premolars (photograph 2002 3M Unitek). 36 2003 JCO, Inc. JCO/JANUARY 2003

Dr. Vogt is in the private practice of orthodontics at 3501 Freemansburg Ave., Easton, PA 18045; e-mail: billvogt@rcn.com. He has a financial interest in the appliance described in this article. and-loop assembly that slides into the headgear tube from the distal and is cinched on the mesial (Fig. 2). This assembly, called the Link n Loop, serves two purposes: it prevents the pin from being dropped during insertion, and it allows the patient to open wider. The other end of the spring connects to the mandibular main archwire or an auxiliary bypass arch. If it is attached directly to the main archwire, a bayonet bend is placed distal to the canines to act as a forward stop and to provide clearance for the spring to pass the premolars as it slides along the archwire (Fig. 3). If the mandibular first and second premolar brackets are already in place, they should be removed to give the spring the widest possible range in which to slide and thus permit the mouth to open wider. Alternatively, the spring can be attached to an auxiliary sectional wire that hooks onto the main archwire in the canine region and passes distally through the first molar auxiliary tube, allowing the premolar brackets to remain on the teeth (Fig. 4). With either type of attachment, the mandibular archwire should be nearly full-size and cinched or tied back securely to prevent mandibular incisor flaring. The maxillary archwire should not be cinched or tied back unless a maximum orthopedic effect is desired. A recent study found that when the maxillary archwire was tied back, the resultant Class II correction was approximately one-third orthopedic and two-thirds dentoalveolar. 1 The Forsus Flat Spring is designed to deliver 225-250g of force when it is compressed 5mm for initial activation. Because it is made of nickel titanium, it delivers a consistent level of force from insertion to removal. If reactivation is needed, however, placing a crimpable stop on the archwire in front of the spring adds about 1.5mm of compression (Fig. 5). For midline corrections, the appliance can be activated unilaterally. In a full Class II case, I recommend that the mandibular incisors be advanced no farther than to an edge-to-edge position before the springs are removed. Molar distalization takes about six months in the typical adolescent patient. Fig. 4 Auxiliary bypass wire hooks onto main archwire in canine region and passes distally through first molar auxiliary tube (photograph 2002 3M Unitek). Fig. 5 Reactivation with crimpable stops (photograph 2002 3M Unitek). VOLUME XXXVII NUMBER 1 37

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction Case Report A 15-year-old male presented with a Class II, division 1 malocclusion with moderate maxillary and mild mandibular crowding (Fig. 6, Table 1). The overjet was 4mm, and the overbite 90%. The patient s smile was slightly gummy, and the mandibular midline was off to the right. The maxillary arch was bonded; mandibular brackets were placed six months later, after the bite had opened sufficiently. Another nine months later, when the mandibular teeth were aligned, the brackets were removed from the mandibular premolars. A cinched.019".025" stainless steel archwire with bayonet bends was then placed in the lower arch with a pair of Forsus Nitinol Flat Springs attached (Fig. 7). The maxillary archwire was left uncinched at the molars to allow maximum maxillary molar distalization. After five months, larger Flat Springs were inserted (Fig. 8); the patient reported no soft-tissue irritation from either pair of springs. Another month later, the springs were removed, and Class Fig. 6 15-year-old male patient with Class II, division 1 malocclusion before treatment. Fig. 7 Insertion of Flat Springs after 15 months of treatment. 38 JCO/JANUARY 2003

Vogt TABLE 1 CEPHALOMETRIC DATA Pre- Clin. Posttreatment Norm Dev. Treatment Facial angle 87.1 88.7 0.4 88.0 Convexity 6.9 0.0 1.4* 3.2 AB plane 10.8 4.6 1.7* 8.5 Mandibular plane 28.4 23.8 1.0* 28.7 Y-axis 59.4 59.4 0.0 59.6 Occlusal plane cant 12.7 9.3 0.9 14.2 Interincisal angle 129.7 130.0 0.1 129.9 Incisor-occlusal plane 14.5 14.5 0.0 16.9 Incisor-mandibular plane 1.1 1.4 0.7 2.2 1-APo 4.6mm 3.5mm 0.5 4.0mm AB-mandibular plane 75.3 74.0 0.3 71.8 Palatal plane 0.8 0.5 0.1 2.1 Overbite depth 76.1% 74.5% 0.3 74.0% Maxillary plane-ab 77.0 81.4 1.0* 81.6 II elastics were used to maintain the new positions of the posterior teeth (Fig. 9). Final space closure was performed, and artistic bends were Fig. 8 Insertion of larger springs after 20 months of treatment. made to finish the case. The brackets were removed after a total of 28 months of active treatment (Fig. 10). The occlusion remained stable a year later (Fig. 11, Table 1). Conclusion For the past few years, I have been using Forsus Nitinol Flat Springs to correct most Class II cases without headgear. This appliance has the following advantages: It does not require time-consuming and expensive lab work or the use of stainless steel crowns. It produces consistent treatment results in a Fig. 9 Removal of springs after 21 months of treatment. VOLUME XXXVII NUMBER 1 39

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction Fig. 10 Patient after 28 months of active treatment. predictable amount of time, without depending on patient cooperation. It can deliver an orthopedic effect to both jaws or more of a dentoalveolar effect. It can be activated more on one side than on the other, so it excels at correcting midline deviations. REFERENCES 1. Heinig, N. and Goz, G.: Clinical application and effects of the Forsus Spring: A study of a new Herbst hybrid, J. Orofac. Orthop. 62:436-450, 2001. 40 JCO/JANUARY 2003

Vogt A A B Fig. 11 A. Patient one year after treatment. B. Superimposition of cephalometric tracings before treatment and one year after treatment. B VOLUME XXXVII NUMBER 1 41