What Is Best Care for Patients with End stage heart failure?

Similar documents
DISCLAIMER: ECHO Nevada emphasizes patient privacy and asks participants to not share ANY Protected Health Information during ECHO clinics.

Heart Failure: Guideline-Directed Management and Therapy

New Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure

Ventricular Assist Device: Are Early Interventions Superior? Hamang Patel, MD Section of Cardiomyopathy & Heart Transplantation

2016 Update to Heart Failure Clinical Practice Guidelines

Heart Failure Management. Waleed AlHabeeb, MD, MHA Assistant Professor of Medicine Consultant Heart Failure Cardiologist

Summary/Key Points Introduction

Heart Failure Management Policy and Procedure Phase 1

CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE

Mechanical assist patient selection, device selection, and outcomes

Chronic. Congestive^ Heart Failure: Update on Effective Monitoring and Treatment. Michael G. Shlipak, MD, MPH

Citation. What is New in the 2013 ACC/AHA HF Guideline. Dimensions in Heart and Vascular Care Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute

Heart Failure with Reduced EF. Dino Recchia, MD, FACC, FHFSA

Congestive Heart Failure: Outpatient Management

Acute Circulatory Support Should We or Shouldn t We?

WHAT S NEW IN HEART FAILURE

Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Management of Heart Failure

3/2/2017. Identifying the Patient for Advanced Therapies. Why is Identifying the Adv HF patient important? CHF Stages and Steps of Treatment

Ramani GV et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:180-95

Intravenous Inotropic Support an Overview

WHEN TO REFER FOR ADVANCED HEART FAILURE THERAPIES

2 I. Reduced EF (HFrEF)

The ACC Heart Failure Guidelines

Advanced Heart Failure: Patient Identification and Treatment Options. Donald Haas, MD, MPH Abington - Jefferson Health Abington, PA

Case (Coding Nightmare) Current Dilemmas in Heart Failure : Closing the Gap between Clinical Care and Coding. Current Dilemmas in Heart Failure :

Advanced Care for Decompensated Heart Failure

Abby Woods, DNP, FNP Southern Illinois Healthcare Supportive Care Program END OF LIFE ISSUES IN THE CARE OF CARDIAC PATIENTS

Overview of MCS in Bruce B Reid, MD Surgical Director Artificial Heart Program/Heart Transplantation

Systolic Dysfunction Clinical/Hemodynamic Guide for Management; New Medical and Interventional Therapeutic Challenges

The Failing Heart in Primary Care

2018 Update on Heart Failure Management. Where we are today.

CHANGING THE WAY HEART FAILURE IS TREATED. VAD Therapy

Predicting Outcomes in LVAD Recipients

Novel Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure

Heart Failure: Combination Treatment Strategies

Antialdosterone treatment in heart failure

HFA- ESC criteria for Advanced HF and US Requirements for Destination Therapy

Nora Goldschlager, M.D. SFGH Division of Cardiology UCSF

Management Strategies for Advanced Heart Failure

HFpEF. April 26, 2018

What s new in heart failure management? Yonsei Cardiovascular Center Yonsei University College of Medicine

Akash Ghai MD, FACC February 27, No Disclosures

เอกราช อร ยะช ยพาณ ชย

Medical Treatment for acute Decompensated Heart Failure. Vlasis Ninios Cardiologist St. Luke s s Hospital Thessaloniki 2011

Bridge to Heart Transplantation

Introduction to Heart Failure. Mauricio Velez, M.D. Transplant Cardiologist APACVS 2018 April 5-7 Miami, FL

Heart Failure. Jay Shavadia

Heart Failure Medical and Surgical Treatment

MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE AND REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION

5 Important Things to Know About Heart Failure. Kia Afshar, MD

Disclosures. Objectives. What is Heart Failure? Best Practices for Managing Patients

Definition of Congestive Heart Failure

State-of-the-Art Management of Chronic Systolic Heart Failure

Optimizing CHF Therapy: The Role of Digoxin, Diuretics, and Aldosterone Antagonists

Chronic. Outline. Congestive^ Heart Failure: Update on Effective Monitoring and Treatment. Heart Failure Epidemiology. Michael G.

Medical Management of Acute Heart Failure

Chronic. Outline. Congestive^ Heart Failure: Update on Effective Monitoring and Treatment. Heart Failure Epidemiology. Michael G.

HEART FAILURE IN WOMEN. Marian Limacher, MD Division of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Florida

Keynote Address II Managing Acute Heart Failure: What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes?

Implantable Ventricular Assist Devices and Total Artificial Hearts. Policy Specific Section: June 13, 1997 March 29, 2013

Update on Mechanical Circulatory Support. AATS May 5, 2010 Toronto, ON Canada

Process Improvement in Heart Failure Patient Care: Transitions From Door to Discharge and Beyond

I have no disclosures. Disclosures

Chronic. Outline. Congestive^ Heart Failure: Update on Effective Monitoring and Treatment. Heart Failure Epidemiology

Topic Page: congestive heart failure

Heart Failure. Dr. William Vosik. January, 2012

Translating Device and Mechanical Support Guidelines to ACHD Research. Timothy M. Maul, CCP, PhD Perfusionist Sr. Research Scientist

ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure

Lessons learned from ENDURANCE, ROADMAP, MedaMACS, and how to go forward?

1/4/18. Heart Failure Guideline Review and Update. Disclosure. Pharmacist Objectives. Pharmacy Technician Objectives. What is Heart Failure?

The Role of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: When to Utilize

Outline. Pathophysiology: Heart Failure. Heart Failure. Heart Failure: Definitions. Etiologies. Etiologies

Sliwa et al. JACC 2004;44:

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Medical Therapy after LVAD

DISCLAIMER: ECHO Nevada emphasizes patient privacy and asks participants to not share ANY Protected Health Information during ECHO clinics.

Heart Failure Background, recognition, diagnosis and management

Updates in Congestive Heart Failure

ACUTE HEART FAILURE. Julie Gorchynski MD, MSc, FACEP, FAAEM. Department of Emergency Medicine Emergency Residency Program UTHSC, San Antonio TCEP 2014

Heart Failure Therapies State of the Art 2017

Device Therapy for Heart Failure

Heart Failure Therapies State of the Art: 2018

Pre-discussion questions

Pathophysiology: Heart Failure

New Paradigms in Rx of Symptomati Heart Failure:Role of Ivabradine & Angiotensin Neprilysin Inhibition

WHAT IS ADVANCED HEART FAILURE? James C. Fang, MD, FACC Professor and Chief Cardiovascular Division University of Utah School of Medicine

Updates in Diagnosis & Management of CHF

End of Life Care in IJN Our journey. Dato Dr. David Chew Soon Ping Consultant Cardiologist National Heart Institute Malaysia

LVADS IN AMBULATORY PATIENTS CLASS III PATIENT SHOULD UNDERGO LVAD IMPLANTATION

Heart Failure A Team Approach Background, recognition, diagnosis and management

OHSU HEALTH SYSTEM OFFICE OF CLINICAL INTEGRATION AND EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

Heart Failure Update. Bibiana Cujec MD May 2015

Ventricular Assist Devices for Permanent Therapy: Current Status and Future

When to implant VAD in patients with heart transplantation indication. Aldo Cannata Dept of Cardiac Surgery Niguarda Ca Granda Hospital Milano

HEART FAILURE. Heart Failure in the US. Heart Failure (HF) 3/2/2014

9/10/ , American Heart Association 2

The Elderly End of Life

Heart Failure Clinician Guide JANUARY 2018

Innovation therapy in Heart Failure

Heart Failure Clinician Guide JANUARY 2016

Transcription:

What Is Best Care for Patients with End stage heart failure? Jin Joo Park, MD Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine Bundang Hospital

NYHA Class Class Patient Symptoms I No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). II III IV Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

Heart Failure Stages At Risk for Heart Failure Heart Failure STAGE A At high risk for HF but without structural heart disease or symptoms of HF STAGE B Structural heart disease but without signs or symptoms of HF STAGE C Structural heart disease with prior or current symptoms of HF STAGE D Refractory HF e.g., Patients with: HTN Atherosclerotic disease DM Obesity Metabolic syndrome or Patients Using cardiotoxins With family history of cardiomyopathy Structural heart disease e.g., Patients with: Previous MI LV remodeling including LVH and low EF Asymptomatic valvular disease Development of symptoms of HF e.g., Patients with: Known structural heart disease and HF signs and symptoms Refractory symptoms of HF at rest, despite GDMT e.g., Patients with: Marked HF symptoms at rest Recurrent hospitalizations despite GDMT HFpEF HFrEF THERAPY Goals Heart healthy lifestyle Prevent vascular, coronary disease Prevent LV structural abnormalities Drugs ACEI or ARB in appropriate patients for vascular disease or DM Statins as appropriate THERAPY Goals Prevent HF symptoms Prevent further cardiac remodeling Drugs ACEI or ARB as appropriate Beta blockers as appropriate In selected patients ICD Revascularization or valvular surgery as appropriate THERAPY Goals Control symptoms Improve HRQOL Prevent hospitalization Prevent mortality Strategies Identification of comorbidities Treatment Diuresis to relieve symptoms of congestion Follow guideline driven indications for comorbidities, e.g., HTN, AF, CAD, DM Revascularization or valvular surgery as appropriate THERAPY Goals Control symptoms Patient education Prevent hospitalization Prevent mortality Drugs for routine use Diuretics for fluid retention ACEI or ARB Beta blockers Aldosterone antagonists Drugs for use in selected patients Hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate ACEI and ARB Digoxin In selected patients CRT ICD Revascularization or valvular surgery as appropriate THERAPY Goals Control symptoms Improve HRQOL Reduce hospital readmissions Establish patient s endof-life goals Options Advanced care measures Heart transplant Chronic inotropes Temporary or permanent MCS Experimental surgery or drugs Palliative care and hospice ICD deactivation 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure

The Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) Profiles Scale Definition Explanation 1 Critical cardiogenic shock ( Crash and burn ) 2 Progressive decline ( Sliding fast on inotropes) Life-threatening hypotension and rapidly escalating inotropic/pressor support, with critical organ hypoperfusion often confirmed by worsening acidosis and lactate levels. Dependent on inotropic support but nonetheless shows signs of continuing deterioration in nutrition, renal function, fluid retention, or other major status indicator. Can also apply to a patient with refractory volume overload, perhaps with evidence of impaired perfusion, in whom inotropic infusions cannot be maintained due to tachyarrhythmias, clinical ischemia, or other intolerance. 3 Stable but inotrope dependent Clinically stable on mild-moderate doses of intravenous inotropes (or has a temporary circulatory support device) after repeated documentation of failure to wean without symptomatic hypotension, worsening symptoms, or progressive organ dysfunction (usually renal). 4 Resting symptoms on oral therapy at home Patient who is at home on oral therapy but frequently has symptoms of congestion at rest or with activities of daily living (dressing or bathing). He or she may have orthopnea, shortness of breath during dressing or bathing, gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal discomfort, nausea, poor appetite), disabling ascites, or severe lower-extremity edema. 5 Exertion intolerant ( housebound ) 6 Exertion limited ( walking wounded ) Patient who is comfortable at rest but unable to engage in any activity, living predominantly within the house or housebound. Patient who is comfortable at rest without evidence of fluid overload but who is able to do some mild activity. Activities of daily living are comfortable and minor activities outside the home such as visiting friends or going to a restaurant can be performed, but fatigue results within a few minutes or with any meaningful physical exertion. 7 Advanced NYHA class III Patient who is clinically stable with a reasonable level of comfortable activity, despite a history of previous decompensation that is not recent. This patient is usually able to walk more than a block. Any decompensation requiring intravenous diuretics or hospitalization within the previous month should make this person a Patient Profile 6 or lower.

Stage, NYHA, INTERMACS ACC/AHA Stage Risk for Heart Failure Heart Failure t rt f HF STAGE B Structural heart disease but without signs or symptoms of HF STAGE C Structural heart disease with prior or current symptoms of HF STAGE D Refractory HF e NYHA Class Structural heart disease e.g., Patients with: Previous MI LV remodeling including LVH and low EF Asymptomatic valvular disease Development of symptoms of HF e.g., Patients with: Known structural heart disease and HF signs and symptoms Refractory symptoms of HF at rest, despite GDMT I II III IVa e.g., Patients with: Marked HF symptoms at rest Recurrent hospitalizations despite GDMT IVb or M THERAPY Goals Prevent HF symptoms Prevent further cardiac remodeling INTERMACS Scale Drugs ACEI or ARB as appropriate Beta blockers as appropriate In selected patients ICD Revascularization or valvular surgery as appropriate HFpEF THERAPY Goals Control symptoms Improve HRQOL Prevent hospitalization Prevent mortality Strategies Identification of comorbidities Treatment Diuresis to relieve symptoms of congestion Follow guideline driven indications for comorbidities, e.g., HTN, AF, CAD, DM Revascularization or valvular surgery as appropriate HFrEF THERAPY Goals Control symptoms Patient education Prevent hospitalization Prevent mortality Drugs for routine use Diuretics for fluid retention ACEI or ARB Beta blockers Aldosterone antagonists Drugs for use in selected patients Hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate ACEI and ARB Digoxin In selected patients CRT ICD Revascularization or valvular surgery as appropriate THERAPY Goals Control symptoms Improve HRQOL Reduce hospital readmissions Establish patient s endof-life goals 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Options Advanced care measures Heart transplant Chronic inotropes Temporary or permanent MCS Experimental surgery or drugs Palliative care and hospice ICD deactivation

Definition of Advanced HF A subset of patients with chronic HF will continue to progress and develop persistently severe symptoms despite maximum GDMT.

Criteria for Advanced HF Repeated ( 2) hospitalizations or ED visits for HF in the past year Progressive deterioration in renal function (e.g., rise in BUN and creatinine) Weight loss without other cause (e.g., cardiac cachexia) Intolerance to ACE inhibitors due to hypotension and/or worsening renal function Intolerance to beta blockers due to worsening HF or hypotension Frequent systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg Persistent dyspnea with dressing or bathing requiring rest Inability to walk 1 block on the level ground due to dyspnea or fatigue Recent need to escalate diuretics to maintain volume status, often reaching daily furosemide equivalent dose >160 mg/d and/or use of supplemental metolazone therapy Progressive decline in serum sodium, usually to <133 meq/l Frequent ICD shocks

Before Confirming End Stage HF Is the diagnosis is correct? Are there are no remediable etiologies or alternative explanations for advanced symptoms. Dyspnea due to pulmonary disease Presumed cardiac cachexia due to cancer Reversible factors such as thyroid disorders Non-compliance to medications, sodium restriction

Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ventricular assisting device Heart transplantation Palliative care Summary

Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) MCS use is beneficial in carefully selected patients with stage D HFrEF in whom definitive management (e.g., cardiac transplantation) or cardiac recovery is anticipated or planned. [II a, LOE B] Nondurable MCS, including the use of percutaneous and extracorporeal ventricular assist devices (VADs), is reasonable as a bridge to recovery or a bridge to decision for carefully selected patients with HFrEF with acute, profound hemodynamic compromise [II a, LOE B]. Durable MCS is reasonable to prolong survival for carefully selected patients with stage D HFrEF [II a, LOE B].

Different Goals of MCS Bridge to transplant (BTT) allow rehab from severe CHF while awaiting donor Destination therapy (DT) permanent device, instead of transplant currently only in transplant-ineligible patients Bridge to recovery (BTR) unload heart, allow reverse remodeling Bridge to candidacy (BTC)/Bridge to decision (BTD) when eligibility unclear at implant not true indication but true for many pts

Pulsatile flow VAD Novacor HeartMate I XVE

Size reduction Pulsatile-flow vs continuous-flow VAD

HeartMate II

Jarvik 2000 Flowmaker

The HVAD (HeartWare Corp.)

Berlin Heart Incor

Issues with cardio-circulatory assist devices The energy source, consisting of very large and heavy compressors Bulky and short life batteries The thrombogenicity of the contact surface with circulating blood The size of the device, too big to consider for long-term intrathoracic implantation The need for extensive connectivity measures with the exterior in order to connect the device to the energy source and to the controller The high rate of bleeding complications and infectious diseases

Who has an LVAD?

10,542 patients received VAD until 2013 Kirklin et al. ISHLT 2014

VAD as Destination Therapy Kirklin et al. ISHLT 2014

Continuous-flow LVAD 1YS: 80%, 2YR: 70% without change in the recent era Kirklin et al. ISHLT 2014

Device strategy at the time of implant Kirklin et al. ISHLT 2014

Outcomes according to INTERMACS scales Patient: Outcomes: Hospitalized HF patients, n= 166, NYHA III-IV, EF 30% Death, MCS, HT Competing events Survival according to INTERMACS VAD Stewart et al. Circ Heart Fail 2016

Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ventricular assisting device Heart transplantation Palliative care Summary

Heart transplantation Evaluation for cardiac transplantation is indicated for carefully selected patients with stage D HF despite GDMT, device, and surgical management [I, LOE C]

Survival (%) Adult Heart Transplants Kaplan-Meier Survival by Era (Transplants: January 1982 June 2012) 100 80 All pair-wise comparisons were significant at p < 0.0001 except 2002-2005 vs. 2006-6/2012 (p = 0.9863). 60 40 1982-1991 (N = 21,341) 1992-2001 (N = 39,446) 2002-2005 (N = 13,541) 2006-6/2012 (N = 22,821) 20 Median survival (years): 1982-1991=8.4; 1992-2001=10.7; 2002-2005=NA; 2006-6/2012=NA 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Years JHLT. 2014 Oct; 33(10): 996-1008

HT survival in Korea Jung SH et al. JKMS 2011

Survival Comparisons INTERMACS MCS HT 7/6 5 4 1 year 84% 74% 60% 80% 90-95% 2 year 69% 80-90%

Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ventricular assisting device Heart transplantation Palliative care Summary

Transition to end-of-life care A patient with advanced HF who Is failing oral therapies Is not a transplantation candidate Is not a mechanical circulatory support candidate Decision making for emergency situations (SCD) clinical situations that can be reasonably anticipated

Palliative care palliare, latin means to cloak [~ 을 (~ 에 ) 가리다 ] treatment for the relief of pain and other uncomfortable symptoms through the appropriate coordination of all aspects of care needed to maximize personal comfort and relieve distress Fed Regist. 2008;73(109):32088 32220

Palliative care in stage D Advanced HF patients are more likely to die of pump failure than SCD; thus they have greater symptoms. The amount of suffering that occurs in advanced HF is underestimated by many health care providers and remains inadequately treated.

Water restriction Water Restriction (II a, LOE C) Fluid restriction (1.5 to 2 L/d) is reasonable in stage D, especially in patients with hyponatremia, to reduce congestive symptoms.

Inotropic support (I) Until definitive therapy (e.g., coronary revascularization, MCS, heart transplantation) or resolution of the acute precipitating problem, patients with cardiogenic shock should receive temporary intravenous inotropic support to maintain systemic perfusion and preserve end-organ performance. [II b, LOE B] Long-term, continuous intravenous inotropic support may be considered as palliative therapy for symptom control in select patients with stage D despite optimal GDMT and device therapy who are not eligible for either MCS or cardiac transplantation. (II b, LOE B)

Inotropic support (II) Long-term use of either continuous or intermittent, intravenous parenteral positive inotropic agents, in the absence of specific indications or for reasons other than palliative care, is potentially harmful in the patient with HF (III, LOE B)

M/84 # ADHF 1st adm 2015.12 57.4kg 57.5kg ( 신장내과 -> 호흡기내과 ) 2nd adm 2016.01 66.4 65.4kg ( d/t influenza 호흡기내과 ) 3rd adm 2016.12 64.7 > 61kg ( 순환기내과, ICD insertion) 4th adm 2017.01 59kg 56kg(d/t pneumonia) 5 th adm 2017.03 # HFrEF 2015-12 CAG: insignicant 2015-12 Echo: EDD 61, EF 38%, RCA (+); sev fmr, mod ecc AR 2016-12 CAG: insignificant 2016-12 Echo: EDD 64mm, EF 32%; sev fmr, mod ecc AR, new RV akinesia 2016-12 ICD implantation, sev fmr, E/e' = 29.51 2017-01 Echo: EDD 60mm, EF 38% # AF on NOAC # DM, HT # Bronchial Asthma; r/o BOOP - s/p Steroid (mpd 30mg qd 16/1/8-1/12, Pd 30mg qd 16/1/13. 16/4 )

M/84 2017-02-24 2017-03-15

Refractory dyspnea low-dose opiates are the mainstay of therapy benzodiazepines as second-line or third-line agents (only drowsiness, adverse effects) oxygen is only beneficial in reducing dyspnea in hypoxic patients, but not for those without hypoxia Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 CD007354.

Depression 20% patients with HF meets criteria for major depressive disorder SSRI still considered first-line therapy for depression in patients with advanced HF. extrapolation from studies in other settings a lack of other proven options TCA has limited role in HF QTc prolongation anticholinergic effects (dry mouth), orthostatic hypotension

Sertraline for Depression (SADHART-CHF) Trial Patient: Intervention: Comparison: Outcomes: HF 45%, NYHA II-IV, clinical depression Sertraline 50-200mg/d for 12 weeks (n=234) Placebo (N=235) change in depression severity & CV status at 12 weeks Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS O Connor et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010

Pain 2/3 of all patients with HF reported some form of pain NYHA III : 69%; NYHA IV : 89% The Pain Assessment, Incidence & Nature in Heart Failure (PAIN-HF) study has identified medical comorbidities most highly associated with pain in patients with advanced HF, including degenerative joint disease, chronic back pain, anxiety, and depression. Opiates usage: 22% in advanced HF vs. 50% in cancer NSAIDS may cause Na + /fluid retention and exacerbate HF.

Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ventricular assisting device Heart transplantation Palliative care Summary

Take Home massage Stage D heart failure Triage of candidates (MCS, HT or palliation) Palliative care includes amelioration of dyspnea, depression, pain Advanced directives both emergent and anticipated situations should be discussed. Communication to address sources of discomfort and to ensure adequate patient understanding of their disease process and prognosis is integral to the care of these patients. Improved use of palliative measures may improve patient comfort and satisfaction with the death and dying process.

Thank You For Your Attention! S e o u l N a t i o n a l U n i v e r s i t y B u n d a n g H o s p i t a l