SOLO SMART. The smart way to return to life. Native-like performance now with stented-like implantability

Similar documents
MEMO 3D. The true reflection of the mitral annulus. Natural physiological 3D motion

MITROFLOW VALSALVA CONDUIT TM

MEMO 3D RECHORD. Ready to repair. Guiding standards in Mitral valve repair

How to Avoid Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch

MEMO 4D Reshaping Mitral Repair

CROWN PRT. Inservice implantation guide

ready to repair product brochure PERFORMANCE INNOVATION DESIGN mitral solutions

CROWN PRT. The crowning touch. Experience designs performance

Prosthetic valve dysfunction: stenosis or regurgitation

Patient/prosthesis mismatch: how to evaluate and when to act?

PPM: How to fit a big valve in a small heart

REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SURGERY AND FACILITATING FASTER RECOVERY

Hemodynamics Benefit of Supra-Annular Design in Failed Bio-Prosthetic Valves

Management of Difficult Aortic Root, Old and New solutions

Role of Sutureless Valves in the Surgeon s Armamentarium Prof. Dr Malakh Shrestha Vice Chair, Director of Aortic Surgery Cardiothoracic,

Experience with 500 Stentless Aortic Valve Replacements

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch or Prosthetic Valve Stenosis?

Does Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Affect Long-term Results after Mitral Valve Replacement?

Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC FACC, FESC President Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons Associate Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery King Abdulaziz

MICS & FEMORAL CANNULAE

Assessment of the St. Jude Medical Regent Prosthetic Valve by Continuous-Wave Doppler. and dobutamine stress echocardiography

Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC, FRCS (Glasgow), FACC, FESC President of Saudi Heart Association King Abdulaziz Cardiac Centre Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

TSDA Boot Camp September 13-16, Introduction to Aortic Valve Surgery. George L. Hicks, Jr., MD

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Mitral Valve Prostheses

Reverse left atrium and left ventricle remodeling after aortic valve interventions

Copyright by ICR Publishers 2014

AVR with Sutureless Valves State of the Art

25 different brand names >44 different models Sizes mm

Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis: 7 years experience in 130 patients

QUANTIFICATION AND PREVENTION TECHNIQUES OF PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH

Single-center experience using the Freedom SOLO aortic bioprosthesis

42yr Old Male with Severe AR Mild LV dysfunction s/p TOF -AV Replacement(tissue valve) or AoV plasty- Kyung-Hwan Kim

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Prosthesis

2017 Cardiovascular Symposium CARDIAC SURGERY UPDATE: SMALLER INCISIONS AND LESS COUMADIN DAVID L. SAINT, MD

The implantation of bioprostheses is the preferred. Influence of Prosthesis Patient Mismatch on Diastolic Heart Failure After Aortic Valve Replacement

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence IP865/2 Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for aortic stenosis

A Practical Approach to Prosthetic Valves

CoreValve in a Degenerative Surgical Valve

Citation for published version (APA): Wollersheim, L. W. L. M. (2016). Aortic valve replacement and the stentless Freedom SOLO valve

Thrombocytopenia in Moderate- to High-Risk Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement

Dysfunction of transcatheter mitral valve prosthesis. Early valve degeneration or thrombosis - that is the question.

Aortic Stenosis Steven F. Bolling, M.D. Professor of Cardiac Surgery University of Michigan

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

Emergency Intraoperative Echocardiography

CONVENTIONAL ADULT CANNULAE

Annular Stabilization Techniques in the Context of Aortic Valve Repair

CONVENTIONAL ADULT CANNULAE

The Tricuspid Valve: The Not So Forgotten Valve. Manuel J Antunes Cardiothoracic Surgery Coimbra, Portugal

Outcome of Next-Generation Transcatheter Valves in Small Aortic Annuli: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Comparison

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Prosthesis

TAVR for Valve-In-Valve. Brian O Neill Assistant Professor of Medicine Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology

In Vitro Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Imaging of a Stented Porcine Bioprosthetic Valve: The Bent Strut Artifact

The Edge-to-Edge Technique f For Barlow's Disease

Aortic valve replacement and prosthesis-patient mismatch in the era of trans-catheter aortic valve implantation

Case. 15-year-old boy with bicuspid AV Severe AR with moderate AS. Ross vs. AVR (or AVP)

A Surgeon s Perspective Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease Adapted from the 2006 ACC/AHA Guideline Revision

Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance over 20 years

Prof. Patrizio LANCELLOTTI, MD, PhD Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, BELGIUM

Surgical Indications of Infective Endocarditis in Children

Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was first defined

Joseph E. Bavaria, M.D. Roberts Measy Professor and Vice Chief CardioVascular Surgery Director: Thoracic Aortic Surgery Program University of

Aortic stenosis with concomitant mitral regurgitation

Aortic valve replacement: is porcine or bovine valve better?

-The Living Aortic Valve- Repair or Else? Ismail El-Hamamsy, MD PhD

Joseph E. Bavaria, M.D. Roberts Measy Professor and Vice Chief CardioVascular Surgery Director: Thoracic Aortic Surgery Program University of

Trifecta Valve. Clinical Compendium. Five Year Data

TAVI Versus Suturless Valve In Intermediate Risk Patients

Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in high risk patients. Β. Κόλλιας, Σ. Ματιάτου, Δ. Αγγουράς.

The impact of prosthesis patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement varies according to age at operation

Reoperation for Bioprosthetic Mitral Structural Failure: Risk Assessment

A Case of Aortic Valve Replacement with St. Jude Medical Regent Valve (First Implant in Japan)

Mechanical vs. Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Time to Reconsider? Christian Shults, MD Cardiac Surgeon, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Thorsten Hanke a, *, Efstratios I. Charitos a,, Hauke Paarmann b, Ulrich Stierle a and Hans-H. Sievers a. Abstract INTRODUCTION

CARDIACSURGERY TODAY. Commentary and Analysis on Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Cardiac Disease

Patient prosthesis mismatch after mitral valve replacement: Myth or reality?

Late secondary TR after left sided heart disease correction: is it predictibale and preventable

15-Year Comparison of Supra-Annular Porcine and PERIMOUNT Aortic Bioprostheses

Severe left ventricular dysfunction and valvular heart disease: should we operate?

Incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients receiving mitral Biocor porcine prosthetic valves

Long-term results (22 years) of the Ross Operation a single institutional experience

Stent valve implantation in conventional redo aortic valve surgery to prevent patient prosthesis mismatch

Tissue vs Mechanical What s the Data??

Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Long-Term Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement

Influence of patient gender on mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

The St. Jude Medical Biocor Bioprosthesis

Valvular Heart Disease

Spotlight on valvular heart disease guidelines. Prosthetic heart valves. Bernard Iung Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University Paris, France

Indications and Late Results of Aortic Valve Repair

Ejection across stenotic aortic valve requires a systolic pressure gradient between the LV and aorta. This places a pressure load on the LV.

Re-do aortic valve replacement after previous homograft aortic root replacement

8. Nov, 2018 Athens Clossroad 2018, Athens GREEK

Increased Gradients After Aortic Valve Replacement With The Perceval Valve: The Role of Oversizing

Seventeen-millimeter St. Jude Medical Regent valve in patients with small aortic annulus: dose moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch matter?

Echocardiographic variables associated with mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis

Is there a place for new anticoagulants in prosthetic valves?

Aortic Valve Replacement With 17-mm Mechanical Prostheses: Is Patient Prosthesis Mismatch a Relevant Phenomenon?

Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

Ejection across stenotic aortic valve requires a systolic pressure gradient between the LV and aorta. This places a pressure load on the LV.

PROVEN PLUS. Introducing the Avalus Aortic Valve by Medtronic.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated surgical bioprostheses

Transcription:

SOLO SMART TM The smart way to return to life Native-like performance now with stented-like implantability

MANY PATIENTS NEED SUPERIOR HEMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE TO RETURN TO THEIR NORMAL LIFESTYLE. 2

SOLO SMART TM THE ONLY NATIVE LIKE VALVE WITH S TEN TED-LIKE IMPL AN TABILIT Y SOLO SMART IS PARTICULARLY INDICATED FOR PATIENTS......WITH AN ACTIVE LIFESTYLE During exercise or even during normal daily activities, where there's an increasing cardiac output, some prostheses can obstruct the blood flow. This can lead to higher pressure gradients which are not apparent at rest. Exercise Hemodynamics of Aortic Prostheses: Comparison Between Stentless Bioprostheses and Mechanical Valves. Silberman et al. Ann Thorac Surg 21;72:1217-1221...AT RISK OF PPM When implanting a prosthesis, the presence of PPM can have an impact on patient outcomes. PPM is associated with less improvement in symptoms and functional class, impaired exercise capacity, less regression of LV hypertrophy, and more adverse cardiac events. Prosthetic Heart Valves: Selection of the Optimal Prosthesis and Long-Term Management. P. Pibarot et al. Circulation. 29;119:134-148...REQUIRING CONCOMITANT AVR AND MV SURGERY Patients requiring a concomitant procedure can result with a smaller effective aortic area and reduced dynamics due to a constrictive effect of the annuloplasty ring or mitral prosthesis. Effect of Mitral Valve Repair on Mitral-Aortic Coupling: A Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography Study. Veronesi et al. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography Vol. 25 N. 5 3

SOLO SMART TM allows your patient to live their life without limits. THE ONLY NATIVE LIKE VALVE WITH S TEN TED-LIKE IMPL AN TABILIT Y SOLO SMART TM satisfies both your and your patients needs: The only valve designed to provide superior hemodynamics and clinical outcomes. All the benefits of FREEDOM SOLO now with an easier and smarter implantability. 4

SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR PATIENTS REQUIRING SUPERIOR HEMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE. PRESSURE GRADIENTS PRESSURE GRADIENTS 25 23.1 25 2 2 18.7 17. 15 1 5 9. 5.1 13.2 4.9 13.2 4.3 1.8 2.7 8.6 mmhg 15 1 5 9.6 8.7 7.6 13.8 5.7 1.8 5.2 9.7 Size 19 Size 21 Size 23 Size 25 Size 27 Size 19 Size 21 Size 23 Size 25 Size 27 12 months 12 months MPG PPG MPG PPG Early clinical and hemodynamic results after aortic valve replacement with the FREEDOM SOLO bioprosthesis (experience of Italian multicenter study). A. Repossini, M. Rambaldini, V. Lucchetti, U. Da Col, F. Cesari, C. Mignosa, E. Picano and M. Glauber Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (212) 41(5): 114-111 The FREEDOM SOLO Valve for Aortic Valve Replacement: Clinical and Hemodynamic Results from a Prospective Multicenter Trial. S. Beholz, A. Repossini, U. Livi, M. Schepens, M. El Gabry, K. Matschke, U.Trivedi, L. Eckel, O. Dapunt, J.L. Zamorano The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 21;19:115-123 SOLO SMART PROVIDES SUPERIOR HEMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE FOR ALL VALVE SIZES, EVEN THE SMALLEST. 5

EOA EOAi 3 2 cm 2 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 1.29 1.75 1.8 2.3 1.99 cm 2 / m 2 1.6 1.2.8.4.42 1.2 Size 19 Size 21 Size 23 Size 25 Size 27 12 months Pre-op 12 months The EOA indices were about 1. cm 2 /m 2 for all valve sizes after 12 months, which suggested almost normal hemodynamics at the valvular level, without any need for annular enlargement procedures. The FREEDOM SOLO Valve for Aortic Valve Replacement: Clinical and Hemodynamic Results from a Prospective Multicenter Trial. S. Beholz, A. Repossini, U. Livi, M. Schepens, M. El Gabry, K. Matschke, U.Trivedi, L. Eckel, O. Dapunt, J.L. Zamorano The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 21;19:115-123 EOA EOAi 3 1.5 1.2 1.77 2 1 cm 2 1.7 cm 2 /m 2.5.39 Pre-op 12 months Pre-op 12 months The present study showed that large EOAs and EOAi s remained substantially stable after the first post-operative year. Our data are consistent with previous studies, which demonstrated excellent early clinical and hemodynamic results. Early clinical and hemodynamic results after aortic valve replacement with the FREEDOM SOLO bioprosthesis (experience of Italian multicenter study). A. Repossini, M. Rambaldini, V. Lucchetti, U. Da Col, F. Cesari, C. Mignosa, E. Picano and M. Glauber Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (212) 41(5): 114-111 SOLO SMART PROVIDES HEMODYNAMICS, EOA AND EOAI CLOSE TO THOSE OF HEALTHY NATIVE VALVES ENSURING SUPERIOR OUTCOMES AND LOWER RISK OF MISMATCH. 6

A VALVE THAT ADAPTS TO THE EVERY DAY NEEDS OF THE PATIENT! Because the Solo Smart TM has no rigid support and is placed supra-annularly it does not restrict the blood flow, offering superior hemodynamics. Hemodynamic performance of Solo Smart under exercise is characterized by: Low gradients under stress Modest mean gradients increase from rest to stress EOA and EOAi increase during exercise Significant LVM regression at 12 months mmhg 15 1 5 4.4 12.3 7. 17.6 cm 2 /m 2 2.5 2 1.5 1 1.74.99 1.8 1.3.5 Rest Peak stress Rest MPG PPG EOA EOAi Peak stress Early clinical and hemodynamic results after aortic valve replacement with the FREEDOM SOLO bioprosthesis (experience of Italian multicenter study). A. Repossini, M. Rambaldini, V. Lucchetti, U. Da Col, F. Cesari, C. Mignosa, E. Picano and M. Glauber Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (212) 41(5): 114-111 THE VALVE MIMICS THE PHYSIOLOGY OF A NATIVE VALVE WITH THE ABILITY OF INCREASING ITS EOA TO RESPOND TO INCREASING PHYSIOLOGIC DEMANDS. 7

SOLO SMART EVERYTHING UNDER CONTROL The new Solo Smart maintains the valve geometry and symmetry within the aortic root to simplify implant procedure and suturing. 8 TM

EASIER, SMARTER IMPLANT PROCEDURE IMPROVES CONFIDENCE DURING IMPLANTATION Improves visibility of implantation site during valve positioning and suturing. Features a "temporary stent" that gives support and facilitates Solo valve implantation. Less time required to complete valve suturing (more than 2% time reduction). Reduces the learning curve in first time users. ALL THE BENEFITS OF A NATIVE-LIKE VALVE NOW WITH THE EASE OF A STENTED BIOPROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION References: Data on file. 9

2/16 RE21178/B Manufactured by: Sorin Group Italia Srl A wholly-owned subsidiary of LivaNova Plc Via Crescentino - 134 Saluggia (VC) Italy Теl: +39 161 487472 - Fax: +39 161 487316 info.cardiacsurgery@livanova.com Please always refer to the Instructions For Use (IFU) manual provided with each product for detailed information, warnings, precautions and possible adverse side effects. 216 LivaNova all rights reserved.