This is copyrighted material. Women and Men in U.S. Corporate Leadership. Same Workplace, Different Realities?

Similar documents
MAKING AN IMPACT ON GENDER EQUALITY LET S UNCOVER THE ISSUES. LET S CREATE SOLUTIONS.

AFP Research Grant Report. African American Development Officers: Confronting the Obstacles and Rising Above them in the New Millennium

Marc Brodherson Laura McGee Mariana Pires dos Reis. Women in law firms

Gender discrimination in the veterinary profession

Promoting Research Integrity. Show Me the Data! Scientific Approaches to Strengthening Research Integrity in Nutrition and Energetics

WOMEN S ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT: A CALL TO ACTION FOR ONTARIO. Ontario.ca/EmpowerWomen

Workplace Diversity. Women of Color in the Legal Profession. March 9, 2018

The Effects of Gender Inequality. identify as women and men. On August 26, 1920, American women were granted the right to

FIU College of Business Administration (CBA) Faculty Climate Survey February, 2011

HERO Industry Research Review

Table of contents. Part I. Gender equality: The economic case, social norms, and public policies

SIOP s Member-to-Member (M2M) Program Get Involved!

FOCUS ON. Diversity & Inclusion

Problems and challenges faced by professional working women in food processing companies in Gujarat Mr. Deval Patel 1, Dr.

We Are One Empowering Women for Generations

Value Differences Between Scientists and Practitioners: A Survey of SIOP Members

Overcoming barriers. Our strategy for

The field of consulting psychology has blossomed in recent years. It

Harry Stevenson, President, Social Work Scotland. Annual Conference and Exhibition 18 and 19 June 2014

Marisa Puckett and Geraldine E. Hynes, Ph.D. Sam Houston State University Huntsville, Texas

PMC 40th Anniversary Gala Dinner, Friday, November 10, 2017, 6:45 pm

Are You a Professional or Just an Engineer? By Kenneth E. Arnold WorleyParsons November, 2014

Colloquium on Global Diversity Creating a Level Playing Field for Women. Moving Beyond Unconscious Bias. February 21, 2014

VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW IN BRIEF

Club Goals and Beyond

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

CANADA GIVING An overview of charitable giving in Canada

Service-Learning Student Evaluation Annual Report

Being an Effective Coachee :

Chief Development Officer National Brain Tumor Society

Strategy at Work. MedStar Health. Engaging people, improving performance

What will women s empowerment mean for men? Selected facts and figures to spark your thinking

Women s Involvement in Local Leadership (WILL):

Results of the 2016 Gender Equality in the Legal Profession Survey

Women s Empowerment in Belarus State Economic University

Perceptions of Transactional and Transformational Leaders According to Gender

Paths to Power. Lauren Rose Carrasco, Amanda Sisley, Monica Zeitlin

Women and Confidence: An Alternative Understanding of the Confidence Gap

RAISE ADHD AWARENESS. Planning a Walk: Expand Your Reach

STATEMENT BY ADVOCATE DOCTOR MASHABANE DEPUTY PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

CANADIAN HARD OF HEARING ASSOCIATION (CHHA) Bringing Visibility to the Invisible Disability

Building A World-Class WELLNESS PROGRAM

Management. A.A. - Modern Management A.A. - Small Business Management

Safety Week 2019 MEDIA RELATIONS TOOLKIT

Jobs for America s Graduates

IAHFMAPOWDERPUFF2016. January 20, 2016

SeniorMed Education Forum 2008 Piecing Together Today s Senior Healthcare Puzzle. May 1, Tampa Marriott Westshore

Eugene AR 2005 duo 7/24/08 10:07 AM Page ANNUAL REPORT GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF LANE AND SOUTH COAST COUNTIES

A Comprehensive Guide for 2016 SPONSORSHIP & UNDERWRITING Programs and Services

According to the Encompass Community Services website, the mission of Encompass is

The Role of Catholic Campus Ministries in the Formation of Young Adults Project report and findings (November 2017) Simon G. Brauer Simon

FLUOR LIMITED GENDER PAY GAP REPORT 2017

About the Modern Language Association

7 KEYS TO COACHING SUCCESS

our aberlour Supporting Children and Families Earlier

Patient Engagement & The Primary Care Physician

Pennsylvania Autism Needs Assessment

The premier gathering of students and professionals who are committed to making a lasting social and environmental impact now and for a lifetime.

AN INSPIRATIONAL AFTERNOON TO CELEBRATE EXTRAORDINARY WOMEN AND SHINE A LIGHT ON COURAGE AND STRENGTH IN OUR COMMUNITY.

Sex Discrimination. Lee Perselay Senior Policy Advisor U.S. Dept. of Labor, Civil Rights Center

Strategic Plan

A Comprehensive Guide for 2017 SPONSORSHIP & UNDERWRITING Programs and Services

Topic 2 Traits, Motives, and Characteristics of Leaders

Improving Meaningful Engagement (ME) in LTC Residents with Dementia: Applying the MemPics Program

CHARITABLE GIVING IN THE USA An overview of individual giving in the USA

IAFF Center of Excellence for Behavioral Health Treatment and Recovery

1/16/18. Fostering Cultural Dexterity School Psychology Conference January 19, What is Cultural Dexterity in 2018? Workshop

Population Council Strategic Priorities Framework

RUSSIA GIVING An overview of charitable giving in Russia

Chapter Affiliation Requirements Workbook

NATIONAL SURVEY OF YOUNG ADULTS ON HIV/AIDS

A New Look at the Awareness and Use of Personal Medication Records: Five Years Later

ADVANCING WOMEN AND GIRLS, ONE CITY AT A TIME

2015 Net Impact Conference

In conjunction with THEME: WOMEN TODAY

Promoting and protecting mental Health. Supporting policy trough integration of research, current approaches and practice

Horticultural and hunting-gathering societies had much less gender discrimination than is present in contemporary societies.

2016 SPONSOR INFORMATION

Framework Partners Incorporated

OUR VISION, OUR PLAN. LET S MAKE IT HAPPEN. CREW Baltimore Strategic Plan

SAP s Autism at Work Program Provides Meaningful Employment for People on the Autism Spectrum

RED BEE MEDIA GENDER PAY GAP REPORT April th MARCH 2018

Investing in Career Development and Lifelong Learning

Volunteer - Supporter. Care team

MINNESOTA GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2015 Phyllis A. Greenberg, PhD Sue Humphers-Ginther, PhD Jim Tift, M.A. Missy Reichl, B.S.

Lesson 12. Understanding and Managing Individual Behavior

Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors of Pregnant Women During the H1N1 Flu Season

25 TM. Gallup ME. St Therese-Chesapeake ME25 Overall. Member Engagement Survey Results. February 2008 THE GALLUP ORGANIZATION

A user s perspective on key gaps in gender statistics and gender analysis *

CONSTITUENT VOICE FISCAL YEAR 2016 RESULTS REPORT

PERCEIVED BARRIERS AND ENDORSEMENT OF STEREOTYPES AMONG ADOLESCENT GIRLS OF COLOR IN STEM. Allison Scott, Ph.D. Alexis Martin, Ph.D.

MONTANA S PEER NETWORK 40 HOUR PEER SUPPORT 101 TRAINING APPLICATION

A Probability Puzzler. Statistics, Data and Statistical Thinking. A Probability Puzzler. A Probability Puzzler. Statistics.

A Comprehensive Guide for 2014 SPONSORSHIP & UNDERWRITING Programs and Services

Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Dynamic Choices for Women

empower youth mentor

Second China-EU Symposium on Gender Equality under HPPD

women.nyc Fast Facts

1. According to John Kotter, which of the following statements is true of change in organizations?

The Psychological drivers that propel and sustain women and men into leadership positions.

Transcription:

Women and Men in U.S. Corporate Leadership Same Workplace, Different Realities?

INTRODUCTION Although women occupy one-half (50.5 percent) of managerial and professional specialty positions in the United States, 1 they hold only 15.7 percent of corporate officer positions in the Fortune 500 (up from 8.7 percent in 1995), 2 and 13.6 percent of board directorships (up from 9.5 percent in 1995). 3 They hold only 7.9 percent of the Fortune 500 highest titles, and represent only 5.2 percent of top earners. 4 Rampant speculation exists as to why there remain such small numbers of women at the top. Some say it is because women do not want to serve in leadership roles, while others think women do not have what it takes to get there. Some believe women possess the necessary skills, but other demands compel them to opt out. Still others believe that subtle, yet pervasive, barriers remain in the way of women who have the skill, desire, and ambition to occupy the top jobs. This study provides hard data that speaks directly to this debate and many other issues related to women in the workplace. We find, for example, that women do want to serve in the most senior leadership roles within an organization. In addition, women and men have equal desires to acquire the CEO job. The similarities between women and men executives do not end there. They report similar levels of work satisfaction, reasons for why they would potentially leave their companies, and strategies for advancing. At the same time, some striking and important differences between women and men executives also exist. 5 While both groups have overcome barriers on the way to their current positions, women report facing a host of stereotypes and environmental challenges that their male colleagues do not. In addition, women have made more trade-offs and adopted more strategies to achieve balance than their male counterparts. These findings represent a new level of knowledge about women executives. Previously, Catalyst investigated the reasons for women s underrepresentation in senior roles by asking women, themselves, about barriers to advancement. We also queried CEOs about their perceptions on this issue. In 1996, Catalyst published the findings of the pioneering study, Women in Corporate Leadership: Progress and Prospects. The study examined the attitudes and experiences of executive women working in Fortune 1000 companies, and compared them to the perceptions of Fortune 1000 CEOs. That report became a highly regarded benchmark among employers, across industries and geographic boundaries. Catalyst replicated the study in 2003, asking women and CEOs the same questions, to assess whether any change had occurred since 1996. However, we knew that to gain a comprehensive understanding of the experiences of executive women, we need also explore the perceptions and experiences of executive men. With this study, Catalyst goes that one step further by comparing the attitudes and experiences of Fortune 1000 women and men executives directly below the CEO level. As a result, we can assess the impact of gender on shaping senior executives work lives and attitudes. 1 Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, Annual Averages 2003. 2 Catalyst, 2002 Catalyst Census of Corporate Officers and Top Earners, (2002). 3 Catalyst, 2003 Catalyst Census of Women Board Directors, (2003). 4 Catalyst, 2002 Catalyst Census of Corporate Officers and Top Earners, (2002). 5 When we note that there is a difference between women and men, we mean that that difference is statistically significant. When we find that a relationship is statistically significant, we know that that relationship is not random, i.e., it is meaningful. For example, when this study reveals a statistically significant difference (at p<.05) between men and women on some variable, the difference is positive and significant at the 9 level. This means that there are less than 5 chances in 100 that this difference would not be observed should we repeatedly test this connection.

We have opened a new chapter in our understanding of women in the workplace. We now know that women and men generally have the same goals and use the same advancement strategies but face very different barriers in their careers. These findings represent a call to action for organizations and for women and men, themselves while pinpointing specific areas in which making change is necessary. These changes necessitate, among other things, creating more inclusive environments; implementing more open career development and advancement processes; and reinforcing communication mechanisms across gender and functional areas to facilitate increased understanding. DEMOGRAPHICS Women and men in this study share similar backgrounds and characteristics. Women s median age is 47, and men s is 51. They are highly educated, with 59 percent of women and 55 percent of men holding graduate degrees. All hold positions at the vice president level and above, and most are within two reporting levels of the CEO. Most respondents are white, while one in ten (10 percent of women, 10 percent of men) are people of color. Almost all of the men (97 percent) are married or living with a partner, while a lower percentage but still a majority (81 percent) of women are married or living with a partner. Just over one-half of women (51 percent) and men (57 percent) have children living with them. KEY FINDINGS Work Satisfaction and Retention Women and men are satisfied with most aspects of their current jobs. The only area in which less than a majority (23 percent of women and 17 percent of men) are satisfied is with the availability of mentors. Women and men report the same top reasons for potentially leaving their current jobs: to make more money and to gain new skills and greater advancement opportunities. Strategies for Success Executive women and men cite similar strategies for their success: hard work (73 percent of women and 70 percent of men), managerial skill (87 percent of women and 88 percent of men), performing on high-visibility assignments (82 percent of women and 75 percent of men), and demonstrating expertise (81 percent of women and 80 percent of men). To facilitate their advancement, the majority of women (81 percent) also developed a style with which male managers are comfortable. Aspirations to Senior Leadership The majority of women (55 percent) and men (57 percent) want to occupy the most senior role (CEO or equivalent) within an organization. Women who have children living with them are just as likely to want the corner office as those who don t have children living with them (55 percent and 46 percent, respectively).

Barriers to Advancement As they advance to senior levels, women confront the same barriers as men; however, women also confront an additional and even more pervasive set of culturally-related barriers such as exclusion from informal networks, stereotyping, a lack of role models, and an inhospitable corporate culture than are experienced by very few men. Barriers to Your Advancement (strongly agree/agree) Women Men Exclusion from informal networks** Gender-based stereotypes** Lack of role models** Lack of line experience* Displaying style different than organizational norm Lack of awareness of organizational politics Lack of mentoring* 13% 18% 2 30% 29% 27% 23% 2 16% 36% 46% 46% 43% Inhospitable corporate culture** Lack of opportunities for visibility Commitment to personal/family* Lack of challenging assignments Lack of desire to reach senior levels Race-based stereotypes Lack of ability to reach senior levels Sexual harassment* Ineffective leadership style 1 8% 10% 7% 8% 8% 6% 6% 0% 24% 13% 17% 12% *Significant difference at p<.05 **Significant difference at p=.000

It appears that men executives do not recognize many of the challenges faced by their female counterparts. In fact, women are much more likely than men to see barriers to the advancement of women within their companies. For example, even though both women and men agree on the top barrier to women s advancement a lack of significant general management or line experience a significantly higher percentage of women (79 percent) than men (63 percent) cite this. Furthermore, women s and men s views diverge tremendously in some areas related to work culture and environment. Women are far more likely than men to cite barriers such as: a lack of awareness of organizational politics (57 percent of women, compared to 22 percent of men); exclusion form informal networks (77 percent of women, compared to 39 percent of men); stereotyping of women s roles and abilities (72 percent of women, compared to 44 percent of men); and lack of opportunities for visibility (51 percent of women, compared to 22 percent of men). Balancing Work and Personal Life In general, women and men have used very different strategies to balance their work and personal lives. Women also used more balancing strategies than their male counterparts. In order to achieve balance between their work and personal lives, women were significantly more likely than men to: employ outside services for domestic help (84 percent of women, compared to 48 percent of men); share personal responsibilities with a partner (66 percent of women, compared to 53 percent of men); use childcare services (45 percent of women, compared to 12 percent of men); rely on supportive relatives other than their partner (22 percent of women, compared to 3 percent of men); and curtail personal interests (56 percent of women, compared to 41 percent of men). In addition, women were significantly more likely than men to not have children (27 percent and 3 percent, respectively), to postpone having children (20 percent of women, compared to 10 percent of men), and to not marry or postpone marriage (13 percent of women, compared to 3 percent of men). They also were more likely than men to take a leave of absence from their jobs or to have had a gap in their employment. Men were significantly more likely than women to hand over personal responsibilities to their spouses or partners (37 percent of men, compared to 28 percent of women), and pursue personal interests (72 percent of men, compared to 60 percent of women). Despite the fact that women have made significantly more choices and trade-offs than their male counterparts in both their work and personal lives the large majority of both groups are comfortable with their choices. About three-quarters of women (73 percent) and men (71 percent) are comfortable with the trade-offs they have made. METHODOLOGY These findings are based on data from surveys completed by 705 senior-level women and 243 senior-level men. Those surveys were mailed in summer and fall 2002. Findings also are drawn from 33 interviews during summer 2003 20 with senior-level women and 13 with senior-level men. Women and Men in U.S. Corporate Leadership: Same Workplace, Different Realities? is sponsored by PricewaterhouseCoopers 2004 Catalyst

Expanding opportunities for women and business NEW YORK 120 Wall Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10005 tel/ 212-514-7600 fax/ 212-514-8470 SAN JOSE 2825 North First Street, Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95134 tel/ 408-435-1300 fax/ 408-577-0425 TORONTO 8 King Street East, Suite 505 Toronto, Ontario M5C 1B5 tel/ 416-815-7600 fax/ 416-815-7601 www.catalystwomen.org