W orkers in poultry slaughtering and processing plants

Similar documents
Update of a study of crude oil production workers

Mortality among aircraft manufacturing workers

An industry wide mortality study of chemical workers occupationally exposed to benzene.

T his report presents the results of a second update of a historical

An updated cohort mortality study of workers exposed to styrene in the reinforced plastics and

Table E1. Standardized Mortality Ratios for Total and Specific Causes of Death Parameter Radiologists Psychiatrists No. of Deaths

David McLean Centre for Public Health Research Massey University. Historical Cohort Studies of Occupational Cancer in New Zealand

5.2 Main causes of death Brighton & Hove JSNA 2013

Suicides increased in 2014

Supplementary Online Content

Diagnosis-specific morbidity - European shortlist

workers potentially exposed to styrene in the reinforced plastics and composites industry

Prioritized ShortList MORBIDITY

ferrochromium workers

E thylene oxide is an important chemical intermediate in

petroleum refinery workers

Information Services Division NHS National Services Scotland

APPENDIX A. Comparability Ratios for the Major Causes of Death in North Carolina Vital Statistics, Volume 2

Information Services Division NHS National Services Scotland

National level ICD 9-3 digit Nuts II european shortlist Croatia 1999/2000 From WHO ICD-10, 4 digit. 1999/2000 From WHO ICD-10, 4 digit

Republican Research and Practical Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology. Ilya Veyalkin Head of Laboratory of Epidemiology Gomel, Belarus

Selected tables standardised to Segi population

APPENDIX ONE: ICD CODES

TABLE C-1 RESIDENT DEATHS, LIVE BIRTHS, FETAL, INFANT, NEONATAL, AND MATERNAL DEATHS: PENNSYLVANIA,

Mortality of workers potentially exposed to organic and inorganic brominated chemicals, DBCP, TRIS, PBB, and DDT

served abroad in the 1950s and 1960s

CANCER IN TASMANIA INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY 1996

Information Services Division NHS National Services Scotland

Mortality among pulp and paper workers in Berlin,

semiconductor workers

S2 File. Clinical Classifications Software (CCS). The CCS is a

Mortality of United Kingdom oil refinery and petroleum distribution workers,

C onstruction is one of the largest industries in Japan,

Table 2.8. Cohort studies of exposure to radium-224, 226 or 228 and their decay products

Further follow up of mortality in a United Kingdom

County of Orange Health Care Agency. Orange County Mortality Data, 2002

SmartVA Analyze Outputs Interpretation Sheet

CANCER MORTALITY IN A BELORUSSIAN TANNERY. Ilya Veyalkin 1, Anatoly Batyan 1. Belarus, 20009; Tel/fax ;

W ork in abattoirs is anecdotally thought to be a

Lecture 29 Epidemiology of Cancer

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF PERIOD SURVIVAL ANALYSIS USING DATA FROM THE CANADIAN CANCER REGISTRY. Larry F. Ellison MSc, Statistics Canada

Mortality Studies Summary of Summaries

Catalogue no. 84F0209X. Mortality, Summary List of Causes

Trends in Irish cancer incidence with predictions to 2020

Appendix 1. DATA SOURCES. A. Data on Recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children

CHAPTER 10 CANCER REPORT. Jeremy Chapman. and. Angela Webster

Cancer in Estonia 2014

Orange County Mortality Data, 1999

Random Sample Pages for Preview

CANCER FACTS & FIGURES For African Americans

Investigations of Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J and Reticuloendotheliosis Virus Infections in Broiler Breeders in China

CANCER IN TASMANIA INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY 1995

A Closer Look at Leading Causes of Death in Guilford County

Estimated Minnesota Cancer Prevalence, January 1, MCSS Epidemiology Report 04:2. April 2004

Catalogue no. 84F0209X. Mortality, Summary List of Causes

Cancer mortality and saccharin consumption

Cancer in Ontario. 1 in 2. Ontarians will develop cancer in their lifetime. 1 in 4. Ontarians will die from cancer

An epidemiological view of working age population in Croatia

chemical manufacturing: a 10 year update

T he study was conducted to assess the health status of

Mortality and cancer incidence in Swedish battery workers exposed to cadmium and nickel

Cancer in Central and South America BOLIVIA

Non-covered ICD-10-CM Codes for All Lab NCDs

2011 to 2015 New Cancer Incidence Truman Medical Center - Hospital Hill

Nested case-control study of leukaemia, multiple myeloma, and kidney cancer in a cohort of petroleum workers exposed to gasoline

T oluene diisocyanate (TDI) and methylene diphenyldiisocyanate

Asbestos and cancer: a cohort followed up to death

ANNUAL CANCER REGISTRY REPORT-2005

Cancer in the Northern Territory :

WLH Tumor Frequencies between cohort enrollment and 31-Dec Below the Women Lifestyle and Health tumor frequencies are tabulated according to:

WLH Tumor Frequencies between cohort enrollment and 31-Dec Below the Women Lifestyle and Health tumor frequencies are tabulated according to:

Cancer in Ireland with estimates for

T he United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of

Texas Chronic Disease Burden Report. April Publication #E

Table 2.1. Cohort studies of ethylene oxide and lymphohaematopoeitic cancer

The comparability ratio is an adjustment factor

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza:

Truman Medical Center-Hospital Hill Cancer Registry 2014 Statistical Summary Incidence

AVIAN VIRAL TUMORS I. MAREK'S DISEASE

VIRUSES AND CANCER Michael Lea

National Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2014

County of Orange Health Care Agency. Orange County Mortality Data 2000

Cancer Risk Factors in Ontario. Other Radiation

Retrospective Cohort Study of Disease Incidence Among Residents of Naval Air Facility (NAF) Atsugi, Ayase, Japan

Cancer in New Mexico 2017

III. KNOWLEDGE BASE ON THE 65 CAUSES OF DEATH (EUROSTAT SHORT LIST)

Supplementary Appendix

Table A: Leading Causes of Death* by Age Group North Carolina Residents, 2016

CANCER IN IRELAND with estimates for : ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL CANCER REGISTRY

Mortality from cancer and other causes of death among synthetic rubber workers

Table 2.2. Cohort studies of arsenic exposure and cancer

IUF Briefing Paper: Avian Influenza (H5N1) and Agricultural Workers October 2005

Cancer in New Mexico 2014

Diagnostic Considerations for Marek s Disease. Frederic J. Hoerr, DVM, PhD AMEVEA - Argentina Colon, Entre Rios May 15, 2013

Epidemiology in Texas 2006 Annual Report. Cancer

*

*It can appear almost anywhere in the body. *The tumor can invade adjoining parts of the body and metastasize to other organs.

Transcription:

784 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Mortality in workers in poultry slaughtering/processing plants: the Missouri poultry cohort study G F Netto, E S Johnson... See end of article for authors affiliations... Correspondence to: A/Prof. E S Johnson, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; meatjoh@tulane.edu Accepted 20 November 2002... Occup Environ Med 2003;60:784 788 Background: Subjects who work in poultry slaughtering and processing plants have one of the highest human exposures to viruses that cause cancer in chickens and turkeys. It is not known whether these viruses cause cancer in humans also. Epidemiological studies investigating this issue are scarce. Aims and Methods: Mortality was studied during the period 1969 90 in a cohort of 7700 subjects who worked in poultry slaughtering and processing plants and were members of a local poultry union in the State of Missouri. Results and Conclusions: Statistically significant excess risks of non-malignant respiratory diseases, accidents, and symptoms, senility, and ill-defined conditions, and increased but not statistically significant excesses for some cancers were observed in particular race/sex groups. Most of these results were based on small numbers of deaths, and in many cases were evident only in particular subgroups of the cohort. Because of this and the multiple comparisons made, chance could not be ruled out in explaining the findings. Furthermore, the cohort is young, with only 6% deceased at the end of follow up. Further follow up of this cohort is required before a reliable assessment of the potential risk associated with these viruses can be made. W orkers in poultry slaughtering and processing plants have one of the highest human exposures to viruses which naturally infect and cause cancer in chickens and turkeys. These viruses include the avian leukosis/ sarcoma viruses (ALSV) and reticuloendotheliosis viruses (REV) that are retroviruses, and Marek s disease virus (MDV), which is a herpes virus. The viruses are widely prevalent in poultry worldwide, with antibody seroprevalence of greater than 80% in some chicken flocks. 1 Humans are commonly exposed to these viruses, and exposure occurs: (1) occupationally among workers engaged in breeding, slaughtering, and processing of chickens and turkeys, and handling of raw poultry products and their eggs; and (2) among the general population through contact with, and ingestion of, poultry and their products including eggs, as well as through contaminated vaccines grown in chicken embryo cells. It was recently reported that all lots of measles and mumps vaccines currently in use in the United States today are contaminated with endogenous ALSV. 2 Similar evidence of reverse transcriptase activity in measles, mumps, and yellow fever vaccines has been reported elsewhere. 3 A survey of commercial eggs in various supermarkets in metropolitan New Orleans indicates that 14% of eggs carry ALSV. 4 Poultry workers and subjects in the general population have been reported to have antibodies against ALSV, REV, and MDV in their blood. 5 6 although similar results have not been reported by others. 7 Because of the widespread human exposure to these viruses, it is important to know whether they cause cancer in humans. Epidemiological studies specifically evaluating the effect of human exposure to these viruses are rare. Waters et al reported no increased risk of cancer in subjects who received yellow fever vaccine, 8 but the study did not have sufficient latency period. Several studies of farmers and veterinarians and ecological studies in relation to poultry have reported excess of tumours of the haemopoietic and lymphatic systems, as well as cancers of the cervix and ovary, and these studies have been reviewed in detail. 1 We studied mortality in 2639 workers in poultry slaughtering and processing plants who were members of a meatcutters union in Baltimore, Maryland. Statistically significant excess of cancers of the oesophagus, pancreas, liver, and rectum, and tumours of the haemopoietic lymphatic systems was observed in the poultry workers. 9 10 We report here the findings of a proportional mortality study of 459 deaths among workers in chicken slaughtering plants who were members of another union in Missouri. METHODS The study population comprised all 7700 workers who were members of a local poultry union in Missouri (AFL/CIO Local 410) between January 1969 and December 1988, and who worked in five plants where chickens and turkeys were killed, de-boned, or processed. They were followed up from 1 January 1969 to 31 December 1990. Date of birth and social security number which were used for tracing, were missing for 325 subjects. Methods of follow up included: (1) current union records; (2) Social Security Administration Mortality Files; (3) Missouri Motor Vehicle Administration; (4) Missouri State Department of Vital Records; (5) National Death Index (NDI); (6) US Postal Service; and (7) personal contact by letter or telephone call. At the end of follow up, 459 deaths had occurred in the cohort. Because of the extensive methods of follow up that were employed, and the fact that extensive searches for deceased individuals through the NDI and the Missouri State Department of Vital Records were conducted, subjects not successfully traced were virtually limited to the 325 (4.2% of the cohort) without social security number and date of birth. The primary method of analysis was the estimation of cause specific proportional mortality ratios (PMR), because information on demographic variables, including race, was complete and available for all deceased subjects. We also performed standardised mortality ratio (SMR) analyses, as a check on the PMR results. Since information on race was not available from the union records, in the SMR analyses all subjects were treated as white, because 92% of all deceased

Mortality in workers in poultry slaughtering/processing plants 785 Main messages N Humans are exposed to retroviruses, which are widespread and naturally infect and cause cancer in chickens and turkeys. N Human exposure can occur through ingestion of, or contact with, blood and secretions of chickens and turkeys, raw eggs, and raw meat products of poultry animals, and through contaminated vaccines. Virtually all of the measles, mumps, and yellow fever vaccines currently in use in the United States are contaminated with the endogenous forms of these viruses. N It is not known whether these viruses cause cancer in humans, but the exogenous forms of these viruses have been shown to infect and transform human cells in vitro, and induce cancer in primates. N Epidemiological studies to investigate the effect of human exposure to these viruses are scarce, and this cohort study of a very highly exposed group of poultry workers is one of the very few to date. N In spite of the young age of the cohort and the short latency period so far, the cohort is already beginning to show excess of certain cancers, consistent with what little information there is in the literature. subjects were known to be white. The PMR analyses are presented for each race/sex subgroup, while for the SMR analyses only the results by gender are presented as the estimates are more stable. For the SMR, the study population was stratified by plant and sex and each stratum was subdivided according to age at entry into the cohort (five year intervals) and calendar year (five year intervals). Personyears were accumulated as from the date of union membership or as from 1 January 1969, for those who were already members of the union before that date. Person-years were enumerated up to the date of death, or date of termination of the study on 31 December 1990, whichever was earlier. Expected deaths were derived by multiplying the personyears in each cell by the corresponding gender, calendar year, age specific mortality rate for the United States general population. The PMR was estimated following similar stratification as for the SMR, with deaths in the study population used in the strata instead of person-years, and deaths in the US general population used as reference to calculate expected deaths. For each cell, the proportion of all deaths due to a given cause in the US population was multiplied by the total number of deaths in the corresponding cell of the study population to obtain the expected number of deaths. RESULTS The SMR and PMR results for all sites were very similar. For example, in, the SMR and PMR for all cancers were both 0.7, and in fe, 0.9 and 1.0, respectively; for cancer of the lung, the SMR and PMR in were both 0.9, and in fe were both 1.3; for arteriosclerotic heart disease, the SMR and PMR for were both 1.0, and in fe were 0.9 and 1.0, respectively (see table 1). Statistically significant PMR results were obtained for nonmalignant respiratory diseases and symptoms, senility, and ill-defined conditions, in white ; in white fe symptoms, senility, and ill-defined conditions was also statistically significant, as well as all accidents. Selected PMRs which appear increased include cancer of the colon, cancer of the pancreas, cancer of the lung, cancer of the Policy implications N In spite of widespread human exposure to the oncogenic retroviruses of chickens and turkeys, and the potential they have shown to infect and transform human cells in the laboratory, epidemiological studies investigating their effects in humans are scarce. N The observation in this study of poultry workers that certain cancers previously observed to be associated with excess occurrence in poultry exposed groups, also appear to be occurring in excess in this study also, in spite of the young age of the cohort and the short latency period, indicates that there is urgent need for future epidemiological studies investigating the health effects of human exposure to these viruses. N There is also an urgent need to determine whether the endogenous forms of these viruses also transform human cells in vitro, and whether the exogenous forms occur in currently used vaccines. This study attempts to call attention to these issues. cervix, cancer of the kidney, cancer of the brain and other CNS, and cancer of the lymphatic tissue. DISCUSSION The agreement between the PMR and SMR results indicate that the PMR findings provide a valid assessment of risk. This Missouri union cohort is one of only a few studies ever performed on workers in poultry slaughtering/processing plants. In spite of the low statistical power, the results agree closely with what little there is in the published literature, and particularly with those obtained in our earlier study of a similar union in Baltimore, Maryland. 9 10 Both studies recorded increased risks of cancers of the lung, pancreas, kidney, cervix, and certain tumours of the haemopoietic and lymphatic systems, non-malignant respiratory diseases, and motor vehicle accidents, although some of these were not statistically significant because of small numbers. The Missouri cohort is very young with only 6% deceased, and the maximum period of follow up for any individual in the cohort is 21 years. The Baltimore cohort was also relatively young, with only 14% deceased. There is growing concern as to whether oncogenic retroviruses such as ALSV and REV, to which the general population is exposed through contaminated vaccines, contact with, and ingestion of, poultry and poultry products, pose a public health threat. 1 2 6 9 10 These two cohorts include subjects with the highest human exposure to these viruses. Thus they have an important role to play in the future, in the evaluation of the potential carcinogenicity of these viruses in humans. At the moment, although increased risks of certain cancers which were sometimes statistically significant have been recorded in both, neither has sufficient statistical power or latency to provide a reliable assessment of the extent if any, of the potential risks posed by these viruses to humans. Continued observation and further follow up of both cohorts are required before the findings will be informative in this regard, but the results thus far indicate that this and similarly exposed groups warrant future attention. This should be accompanied by laboratory based molecular studies of the oncogenicity in human cells, of the endogenous forms of these viruses which presently contaminate vaccines commonly used in children and adults.

786 Netto, Johnson Table 1 Proportional mortality ratios (PMR) and standardised mortality ratios (SMR) by race and sex (Missouri Poultry Union, 1969 90) All deaths Obs 360 330 30 99 94 5 ICD 000 999 * 1.0 (0.8 to 0.9) (0.8 to 1.2) All cancers Obs 118 110 8 18 17 1 (ICD 140 209) PMR 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.7 (0.9 to 1.2) (0.9 to 1.3) (0.4 to 2.0) (0.4 to 1.2) (0.4 to 1.2) 0.7 (0.8 to 1.1) (0.4 to1.2) All infective and parasitic Obs 7 7 0 2 2 0 diseases PMR 1.4 2.0 (ICD 000 139) (0.6 to 3.0) (0.8 to 4.0) SMR 1.5 (0.6 to 3.1) Cancer of stomach Obs 1 1 0 2 2 0 (ICD 151) Cancer of colon Obs 15 15 0 2 2 0 (ICD 153) PMR 1.4 1.5 (0.8 to 2.3) (0.8 to 2.4) SMR 1.2 (0.7 to 2.0) Cancer of rectum Obs 2 2 0 0 0 0 (ICD 154) Cancer of liver Obs 1 1 0 0 0 0 (ICD 155 156) Cancer of pancreas Obs 8 8 0 0 0 0 (ICD 157) PMR 1.5 1.7 (0.7 to 3.0) (0.7 to 3.3) (0.6 to 2.7) Cancer of lung Obs 30 26 4 8 7 1 (ICD 162) PMR 1.4 1.3 3.1 0.9 0.9 (0.9 to 1.9) (0.9 to 1.9) (0.8 to 7.8) (0.4 to 1.8) (0.3 to 1.7) SMR 1.2 (0.8 to 1.8) Cancer of skin Obs 1 1 0 0 0 0 (ICD 172 173) Cancer of breast Obs 18 15 3 0 0 0 (ICD 174) PMR 0.7 0.7 1.8 (0.4 to 1.2) (0.4 to 1.1) (0.4 to 5.4) SMR 0.6 (0.4 to 1.0) Cancer of cervix uteri Obs 6 6 1 (ICD 180) PMR 2.1 2.1 (0.8 to 4.3) (0.8 to 4.5) SMR 1.6 (0.6 to 3.6) Cancer of corpus uteri Obs 3 3 0 (ICD 181 182) PMR 1.0 1.1 (0.2 to 2.9) (0.2 to 3.1) (0.2 to 2.6) Cancer of other genital Obs 5 5 0 organs PMR 0.7 0.7 (ICD 183 184) (0.2 to 1.5) (0.2 to 1.6) SMR 0.6 (0.2 to 1.3) Cancer of prostate Obs 1 1 0 (ICD 185) Cancer of bladder Obs 2 2 0 1 1 0 (ICD 188) Cancer of kidney Obs 3 3 0 1 1 0 (ICD 189) PMR 1.6 1.8 (0.3 to 4.8) (0.4 to 5.2) (0.3 to 4.2) Cancer of brain and other Obs 5 5 0 0 0 0 CNS PMR 1.6 1.7 (ICD 191 192) (0.5 to 3.8) (0.5 to 3.9) (0.5 to 3.2) Lymphosarcoma and Obs 2 2 0 0 0 0 reticulosarcoma (ICD 200) Multiple myeloma Obs 1 1 0 0 0 0 (ICD 203)

Mortality in workers in poultry slaughtering/processing plants 787 Table 1 Continued Leukaemia and aleukaemia 2 2 0 2 2 0 (ICD 204 207) Cancer of other lymphatic Obs 5 5 0 0 0 0 tissue PMR 1.2 1.3 (ICD 202 203, 208) (0.4 to 2.7) (0.4 to 3.1) (0.3 to 2.5) All haemopoietic and Obs 10 10 0 2 2 0 lymphatic cancer PMR 1.0 1.1 (ICD 200 209) (0.5 to 1.8) (0.5 to 2.0) (0.4 to 1.6) Benign neoplasms Obs 1 1 0 0 0 0 (ICD 210 239) Diabetes mellitus Obs 9 8 1 0 0 0 (ICD 250) PMR 1.0 1.1 (0.5 to 1.9) (0.5 to 2.1) (0.4 to 1.8) All diseases of blood and blood forming organs Obs 1 1 0 1 1 0 (ICD 280 289) All diseases of nervous system and sense organs (ICD 320 389) All diseases of circulatory system Obs 2 1 1 1 1 0 Obs 131 118 13 32 30 2 PMR 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.8 (ICD 390 458) (0.8 to 1.1) (0.8 to 1.1) 0.5 to 1.7) (0.6 to 1.1) (0.5 to 1.1) SMR 0.8 (0.7 to 1.0) Arteriosclerotic heart disease Obs 82 74 8 22 20 2 and CHD (ICD 410 414) PMR 1.0 1.0 1.3 0.8 0.7 (0.8 to 1.3) (0.8 to 1.2) (0.6 to 2.5) (0.5 to 1.2) (0.4 to 1.1) (0.7 to 1.1) All vascular lesions of CNS Obs 18 16 2 3 3 0 (ICD 430 438) PMR 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 (0.4 to 1.2) (0.4 to 1.2) (0.2 to 2.2) (0.2 to 2.3) SMR 0.7 (0.4 to 1.0) All non-malignant respiratory Obs 17 15 2 11 11 0 diseases PMR 0.8 0.8 1.8 1.9* (ICD 460 519) (0.5 to 1.2) (0.4 to 1.3) (0.9 to 3.2) (1.0 to 3.5) SMR 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1) All pneumonia Obs 4 4 0 4 4 0 (ICD 480 486) PMR 0.6 0.6 2.1 2.4 (0.2 to 1.4) (0.2 to 1.6) (0.6 to 5.4) (0.6 to 6.1) (0.1 to 1.2) Asthma Obs 2 2 0 0 0 0 (ICD 493) Gastric and duodenal ulcer Obs 1 0 1 0 0 0 (ICD 531 533) Cirrhosis of liver Obs 4 4 0 1 1 0 (ICD 571) PMR 0.6 0.6 (0.2 to 1.4) (0.2 to 1.6) (0.1 to 1.2) Nonmalignant diseases of genitourinary system Obs 6 6 0 2 2 0 PMR 1.1 1.4 (0.4 to 2.5) (0.5 to 3.0) (ICD 580 629) (0.4 to 2.4) Chronic nephritis Obs 1 1 0 0 0 0 (ICD 582) Symptoms, senility and illdefined conditions Obs 14 13 1 8 8 0 PMR 3.3 3.5* 5.5* 6.0* (ICD 780 799) (1.8 to 5.5) (1.8 to 5.9) (2.4 to 10.9) (2.6 to 10.8) SMR 3.1* (1.7 to 5.2) All external causes of death Obs 32 30 2 22 21 1 (ICD 800 998) PMR 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7) (0.8 to 1.7) (0.8 to 1.8) (0.7 to 1.8) (0.7 to 1.5)

788 Netto, Johnson Table 1 Continued ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. The study protocol was approved by the Human Subjects Committee of the NIEHS.... Authors affiliations G F Netto, E S Johnson, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA REFERENCES 1 Johnson ES. Poultry oncogenic retroviruses and humans. Cancer Detect Prev 1994;18:9 30. 2 Tsang SX, Switzer WM, Shanmugam V, et al. Evidence of avian leucosis virus subgroup E and endogenous avian virus in measles and mumps vaccines derived from chicken cells: investigation of transmission to vaccine recipients. J Virol 1999;73:5843 51. All accidents Obs 25 23 2 14 14 0 (ICD 800 949) PMR 1.5* 1.5 1.3 1.3 (1.0 2.2) (0.9 to 2.2) (0.7 to 2.2) (0.7 to 2.2) (0.9 to 2.0) All motor vehicle accidents Obs 15 15 0 11 11 0 (ICD 810 827) PMR 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.8 (0.9 to 2.5) (0.9 to 2.6) (0.9 to 3.2) (0.9 to 3.2) (0.8 to 2.3) Suicide Obs 4 4 0 0 0 0 (ICD 950 959) PMR 0.6 0.6 (0.2 to 1.6) (0.2 to 1.6) (0.2 to 1.4) SMR, PMR, and confidence intervals reported only for three or more deaths. 3 Boni J, Stadler J, Reigel F, et al. Detection of reverse transcriptase activity in live attenuated virus vaccines. Clin Diagn Virol 1996;5:43 53. 4 Pham TD, Spencer JL, Traina-Dorge VL, et al. Detection of exogenous and endogenous avian leukosis virus in commercial chicken eggs using reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction assay. Avian Pathol 1999;28:385 92. 5 Johnson ES, Overby L, Philpot R. Detection of antibodies to avian leukosis/ sarcoma viruses (ALSV) and reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) in humans by Western blot assay. Cancer Det Prev 1995;19:472 86. 6 Choudat D, Dambrine G, Delemotte B, et al. Occupational exposure to poultry and prevalence of antibodies against Marek s disease virus and avian leucosis retroviruses. Occup Environ Med 1996;53:403 10. 7 Hussain AI, Shanmugam V, Switzer WM, et al. Lack of evidence of endogenous avian leukosis virus and endogenous avian retrovirus transmission to measles mumps rubella vaccine recipients. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:2001. 8 Waters TD, Anderson Jr PS, Beebe GW, et al. Yellow fever vaccination, avian leukosis virus, and cancer risk in man. Science 1972;177:76 7. 9 Johnson ES, Shorter C, Rider B, et al. Mortality from cancer and other diseases in poultry slaughtering/processing plants. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26:1142 50. 10 Metayer C, Johnson ES, Rice JC. Nested case-control study of tumors of the hemopoietic and lymphatic systems among workers in the meat industry. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:727 38. Occup Environ Med: first published as 10.1136/oem.60.10.784 on 22 September 2003. Downloaded from http://oem.bmj.com/ on 6 September 2018 by guest. Protected by copyright.