AAM Fall Tech Conference November 6-8, 2017 Rockville, MD

Similar documents
Use of Bridging Justifications to Support the Safety of Excipients in Generic Drug Products

What's Important to Consider When Developing a Complex Generic Drug? September 5, 2018

Overview of USP General Chapters <476> and <1086> Prescription/Non-Prescription Stakeholder Forum October 19, 2017

Bioequivalence Requirements: USA and EU

FILL AMOUNT CONTROL FOR LIQUID AND SEMISOLID DOSAGE FORMS

USP Perspective on Atypical Actives November 29, 2017

Completion of the development of a formulation: Requirements for compliance check vs. requirements for Marketing Authorisation

COMMENTS. Submitted by The International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium

Biopharmaceutics of Non-Orally Administrated Drugs

Liposome Drug Products Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls; Human Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability; and Labeling Documentation

General Chapter/Section: <232> Elemental Impurities - Limits Expert Committee(s): General Chapters Chemical Analysis No.

in the ICH Regions Table of Content Annexes to Guideline and 3. Why is Q4B necessary? Q4B Annexes? for Human Use

DRUG PRODUCT PERFORMANCE: CONSIDERATIONS FOR INTERCHANGEABILITY OF MULTISOURCE DRUG SUBSTANCES AND DRUG PRODUCTS

Documents Regarding Drug Abuse Assessments

The EU PIP - a step in Pediatric Drug Development. Thomas Severin Bonn,

Lawrence X. Yu, Ph.D. Director (acting) Office of Pharmaceutical Science Food and Drug Administration

Review Article ISSN: Open Access. Regulatory Aspects of Pharmaceutical Excipients in India and their Qualification to Use in Pharmaceuticals

Understanding Regulatory Global Requirements for Nasal Drug Products. Julie D. Suman, Ph.D. April 8, 2016

Challenges and Strategies to Facilitate Formulation Development of Pediatric Drug Products

AAPS Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA November 12, 2017 Short Course. Pharmaceutical Excipients: Biopharmaceutical, QC and Regulatory Considerations

A Modern Approach to Excipient Quality Assurance

Current FDA Perspective on Excipients NJPhAST Meeting September 15, 2016

Risk-Based CMC ANDA Review

Organic Impurities in Drug Substances and Drug Products. Antonio Hernandez-Cardoso, M.Sc. Senior Scientific Liaison September 8, 2017

Work plan for the joint CHMP/ CVMP Quality Working Party (QWP) for 2018

AAPS Views on Bioanalytical Method Validation Harmonization (on Behalf of AAPS Bioanalytical Community)

Guidance for Industry

FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT - A QbD Approach to Develop Extended Release Softgels

Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012; Regulatory Science Initiatives; Public Hearing;

Excipient Considerations for Continuous Manufacturing Implementation

DSQC Overview. Scott Kuzner, Ph.D. USP Global External Affairs Director

Tablet is a major category of solid dosage forms which are widely used worldwide. Extensive information is required to prepare tablets with good

ANDA Submissions Refuse to Receive for Lack of Proper Justification of Impurity Limits Guidance for Industry

Co-processed Excipient Guide

Drug/Device Combination Products: Bioequivalence

BCS: Dissolution Testing as a Surrogate for BE Studies

REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE. Dr. Raghunandan H V Associate Professor JSSCP, JSSU, Mysore

Interchangeable Drug Products - Additional Criteria

7/16/2015. Introduction to USP. The Role of the U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention in Manufacturing OTC Medicines and Dietary Supplements.

Current Challenges and Opportunities in Demonstrating Bioequivalence

Fourth Symposium on Phospholipids in Pharmaceutical Research. 21 st 22 nd, September 2015 Heidelberg, Germany. 3rd Circular

A New USP Tool The Class Monograph

Strategic Plan Executive Summary Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco

Biowaiver Study on Prednisolone Tablets 5 mg in Three Different Brands. Marketed in Sudan. Safaa Mohamed *, Tilal Elsaman

Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

Naloxone Expanded Access: OTC status Considerations for a Nonprescription Drug Development Program

Liver Forum Cirrhosis Working Group Arun J. Sanyal

FDB FOOD AND DRUGS BOARD G H A N A GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES

CAPMUL + CAPTEX + ACCONON = SEDDS

Controlled Delivery of Biologics NBC 22 June 2009

<1151> Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and <1152> Animal Drugs for Use in Animal Feeds

E11(R1) Addendum to E11: Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Pediatric Population Step4

Best Practices for OINDP Pharmaceutical Development Programs Leachables and Extractables

MEETING PROSPECTUS. International Workshop on NASH Biomarkers

DISSOLUTION TESTING - Exploring the Link Between Particle Size & Dissolution Behavior for OINDPs

Clinical Endpoint Bioequivalence Study Review in ANDA Submissions. Ying Fan, Ph.D.

JOIN US TO INTEGRATE CLINICAL RESEARCH AND HEALTH CARE

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

Agenda. What we do. GMA - Overview 30,000. Public Private Partnerships in the Development of Food Safety Regulations. $415 billion

Identifying the Root Causes of Drug Shortages and Finding Enduring Solutions

New Annex 15 Updated Requirements & Approach to Validation. Presented by Ashley Isbel 10 th August 2015

Significance of Leachables and Extractables to Pharmaceutical Quality

Why and how does a pharmaceutical company take the risk to use novel excipients?

Update on the Clinical Outcome Assessment Qualification Program and COA Compendium

REGULATION AND HTA OF MEDICAL DEVICES IN EU: WHAT CAN WE LEARN?

Enhancement of the communication and outreach strategy of the

Biopharmaceutics Dosage form factors influencing bioavailability Lec:5

The Complexity of Setting Compendial Specifications for Excipient Composition and Impurities

COMPENDIUM OF MONOGRAPHS NATURAL HEALTH PRODUCTS DIRECTORATE

USP Chewable Gels Monographs

SPONSORSHIP INFORMATION DOCUMENT. Izzy Dempsey Nov 2018 Hong Kong. 29 Nov - 1 Dec 2017 Halifax, Canada

Inhalation Product Research at FDA

Global Pediatric Development: We Are Making Progress. PMDA Perspective. Junko Sato, PhD PMDA

Bioequivalence of Oral Generic Product with An Alternate Administration

Overview of Generic Drug Policy and Introduction of its Review Points/BE Guideline in Japan

Soluplus The Solid Solution Opening New Doors in Solubilization.

General Considerations for Age-Appropriate Formulations: FDA Clinical Perspective

SUSTAINABLE OCEAN SUMMIT 2016

Dr. Sandeep Bhattacharya, Chief Innovation & Strategy Officer, Merck & Co., Inc. / MSD Asia Pacific

State Pharmacopoeia of Ukraine

SPS Pharma: Who we are?

SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DOSIMETRY FOR RADIATION PROCESSING

FDA s Inactive Ingredient Database Update on the Substance Registration System Changes

Overview Internal review

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Attention: Scott D. Tomsky Vice President, US Generics Regulatory Affairs 425 Privet Road Horsham, PA 19044

Caption: The equipment required for testing Fluticasone Propionate (FP) Inhalation Powder in line with a new product-specific monograph (USP36-NF31).

Office of Generic Drugs. April 14, 2010

Disclosure. Objectives. Objectives. Introduction. Introduction. Non-Sterile Compounding/Calculations

EDQM and European Pharmacopoeia: State-of-the-art Science for Tomorrow s Medicines

Topics covered by the talk

Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission

The science behind generic drugs

Residual Solvents: FDA/ Regulatory Perspective

Perspectives on alternatives to thiomersal

Excipient Functionality & Pharmacopoeia IPEC Europe Excipients Forum Nice, 5 February 2015

GDUFA: 2 ½ years later Impact & Importance

Investigator Responsibilities in Protecting Participants in the Conduct of Bioequivalence Studies Cecilia C. Maramba, MD, MScID

Boehringer Ingelheim BioXcellence. Producing Value. Global Contract Manufacturing Excellence

General concepts in the Ph. Eur.: theory and rationale

Session 1 : Orally Administered Modified Release Products

Transcription:

AAM Fall Tech Conference 2017 November 6-8, 2017 Rockville, MD

Excipients Breakout Session Highlights of FDA-USP workshop on Critical Importance of Excipients in Drug Development Why Excipients are Important Now and In the Future The Need to update USP Excipient Standards Catherine Sheehan, Sr. Director, Science Excipients United States Pharmacopeia

Presentation outline The FDA/USP Workshop: February 27-28, 2017 Goals and objectives Key Highlights of the Workshop Summary/Conclusions

FDA/USP Workshop Agenda Highlights 27 presentations over two days with speakers from: USP Staff USP Expert Committees FDA Industry & Academia: BASF UCSF G&W Laboratories U of Michigan Neo-Advent Technologies LLC Lonza Genentech Boehringer Ingelheim Presentation topics included: Introduction to Pharmaceutical Excipients Impact of Excipients on Drug Product Quality, Bioequivalence of Generic Drugs and Complex Drug Products Excipient Quality and Continuous Manufacturing Risk-based Evaluation of Drug Product Quality: Impact of Excipients Bridging studies supporting the Safety Assessments for Excipients in Generic Drugs impact of excipients on parenteral drug products such as liposome, microsphere, emulsion, implant. Impact of Excipients on Absorption of Oral Dosage Forms Emerging topics on excipients - novel excipients 4 2017 USP

FDA/USP Workshop, Feb 27-28, 2017 Highlights Great interest in Excipients! The largest public forum ever held at USP s HQ in Rockville, MD 300+ registered attendees (from outside USP) The overflow room was overflowing 100+ attendees from FDA Attendees from Asia, South America and Europe as well as the US 5

FDA/USP Workshop, Feb 27-28, 2017 Videos Videos from most of the sessions are available on the USP Excipients website: 6

Reason for workshop FDA sharing research Oftentimes, stakeholders focus only on the compatibility of the excipient with the API leads to product failure/recalls during commercialization. The impact of excipients on drug release and absorption is often overlooked especially for drug products with a waiver of in vivo study option. The impact of excipients on those special drug delivery systems were evaluated for both in vitro properties (e.g., stability, dissolution, physicochemical properties), in vivo performance such as drug absorption 7 2017 USP

The benefits of this workshop are engaged stakeholder sponsorship and collaboration Discuss the challenges experienced due to excipient compatibility with the API, with the manufacturing process, and with the intended use/dosage form. Seek constructive input from a wide range of stakeholders including industry (generics, biopharmaceuticals as well as users, makers and suppliers of pharmaceutical excipients) and regulatory agencies Share ideas on excipient compatibility, composition, absorption and toxicity. Seek input in establishing a quality NF specification through up-todate and harmonization initiatives. 8 2017 USP

FDA-USP Excipient Workshop Goals and Anticipated Outcomes Advance the science of excipient selection and regulatory evaluation: Regulatory science a decision science. Enable better and faster regulatory decisions about excipients. Encourage innovation in product development Value of excipient function to drug product performance and equivalence. Expand access to complex generics. (Robert Lionberger, US FDA) 9 2017 USP

Key areas of interest identified Session I: General Introduction to Excipients Session II: Toxicity and Pharmacology Session III: Considerations for Complex Drug Products Session IV: Emerging Topics with respect to Excipients 10

Session I General Introduction to Excipients

Presentation Summaries Impact of Excipient Grade (Q1/Q2) on Bioequivalence of Generic Drug Products Stephanie Choi, Ph.D., U.S. FDA To investigate changes in excipient grade and their impact on bioequivalence and bioavailability, FDA has an ongoing research program for generic drugs for various product categories to guide development of guidances and recommendations to industry on excipient selection for generic products. Impact of Excipient Quality Attributes on Bioequivalence of Complex Drug Products: Pharmaceutical Industry Perspectives Tony Wei-Qin Tong, Ph.D., G&W Laboratories Excipients can significantly impact the bioequivalence of complex drug products. Applying Quality by Design (QbD) in product development to fully understand these impacts and putting in place proper controls are essential to ensure drug product quality. 12

Presentation Summaries Understanding the Impact of Material Attributes on Product Quality for Continuous Manufacturing Thomas O Connor, Ph.D., U.S. FDA For continuous manufacturing processes, the impact of variation in material attributes on material feeding and process dynamics should be characterized and appropriate controls implemented if needed. Improved Excipient Characterization Beyond USP Monographs Eric Munson, Ph.D., Chair, USP Excipient Monographs 1 EC This presentation focused on understanding USP NF excipient monographs and the structural/functional properties of excipients, including the role of each in developing drug products. 13

Session II Toxicity and Pharmacology

Presentation Summaries Safety Assessments for Excipients in Generic Drugs: A Regulatory Perspective Sruthi King, Ph.D., U.S. FDA Excipients in generic drug products are evaluated from clinical and nonclinical perspectives to ensure that they do not alter the safety profile of the formulation, as compared to the Reference Listed Drug. FDA Pharmacology/Toxicology Review of the proposed level of an excipient includes an evaluation of toxicology data to support the dose, route of administration, duration of exposure, and patient population. 15 2017 USP

Presentation Summaries Bridging Justifications: Supporting the Safety of Excipients in Generic Drug Products* Robert Dorsam, Ph.D., U.S. FDA A bridging justification is an approach for safety assessments where toxicology data for one or more compounds is applied to a different compound. Important elements of a bridging justification include the similarity and difference between excipients, existing nonclinical and clinical data, data gaps, and the proposed context of use. OGD Pharm/Tox reviews bridging justifications within ANDAs to ensure excipient safety in generic drugs. Each case is unique but similar principles apply. *Presented again at the USP workshop held at the April 2017 ExcipientFest, Rhode Island 16 2017 USP

Session III Considerations for Complex Drug Products

Presentation Summaries Impact of Excipients on Topical Drug Formulation Microstructure and Performance Norman Richardson, M.S., BASF Selection of excipients (Q1) and quantity of each excipient (Q2) determines the nature of the heterogeneous, multiphasic microstructure (Q3) of the topical semi-solid composition. Q3 plays a critical role in driving performance. 18

Presentation Summaries Impact of Excipients on Inhalation Drug Products Kimberly Witzmann, M.D., U.S. FDA Differing levels of excipients within inhalation products may have a significant impact on product performance, and from a scientific and regulatory perspective, will need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The Role and Influence of Excipients in Orally Inhaled Drug Products Anthony Hickey, Ph.D., Member, USP General Chapters Dosage Forms EC Orally inhaled products contain formulation excipients, the effects of which on quality, performance, safety, and efficacy must be considered. Only a few excipients are employed in orally inhaled drug products, but their properties are critical to the quality and performance of these dosage forms. 19

Presentation Summaries Excipients in Parenteral Drugs Wenlei Jiang, Ph.D., U.S. FDA More research and clarification on regulatory requirements of complex parenteral excipients are needed for developing complex parenteral drug products. 20

Excipients in Complex Drug Products Excipients can impact the bioequivalence of complex drug products. We can implement and apply QbD in product development to better understand these impacts: Identify critical material attributes for the excipients. Use of risk assessments, etc. Communication with between supplier and user. We can use this enhanced understanding to: Develop robust formulations and processes which can accommodate typical excipient variability without impacting drug product performance. Implement proper controls, including excipient specifications, to ensure drug product quality. 21

Excipient characterization What are we looking for: Better and faster chemical characterization Better understanding of excipient composition. Better and faster physical characterization Better understanding of form and function More relevant tests Relating to excipient CMAs and product CQAs Analytical methods applicable to continuous manufacturing To maintain product quality and patient safety 22

Excipient characterization Excipients for the emerging complex lipid formulations (e.g. liposomes) FDA is working to better understand the issues concerning generic equivalence of such products. Characterization of lipid and lipid-derived excipients from different manufacturers and different sources. What is the impact on the formulation? What further regulatory constraints are required for parenteral use? Example excipients include: cholesterol, phosphatidyl choline, oleic acid, etc. 23

Session IV Emerging Topics with respect to Excipients

Presentation Summaries Excipient Composition and the Formulation of Biotechnology Drugs Thiago Carvalho, Ph.D., Member, USP Excipient Monographs 1 EC Excipient composition may impact the critical quality attributes of biologics drug products and bring challenges to the excipient monograph Up-to-Date Initiative. USP aims to work closely with FDA and industry stakeholders in identifying a pathway for novel excipients not yet in approved drug products. 25

Presentation Summaries HCP Mediated Degradation and Potential Mitigation Strategies Y. John Wang, Ph.D., Genentech Research on PS 20 and PS 80 degradation shows that the enzymatic hydrolysis of PS 20 and PS 80 is linked to precipitating particles in drug products. Removal of long-chain fatty acids could mitigate this concern. PS 20 made from greater than 99% lauric acid exhibited no or minimal particles of insoluble fatty acids. Although it was made and used prior to 2004, this material now requires FDA approval prior to inclusion in an NF monograph. Pathways for Development and Approval of Novel Excipients Keith Horspool, Ph.D., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Pharmaceutical companies and excipient developers are working together to engage FDA in discussions on potential opportunities for a qualification process to encourage sustained innovation in novel excipients. This process would also stimulate their use in creating more effective, convenient, and cost-effective products for patients. 26

Workshop Summary/Conclusions Excipients are a hot topic for several reasons Potential for adulteration Issues with Excipient Composition and the Formulation of Biotechnology Drug Products e.g., formation of aggregates in protein therapeutics Use in Complex Drug Products Excipients for Parenteral Drug Products Other Workshop topics not covered in this presentation include: Equivalence of Topical Drug Formulations Excipients for Inhalation Drug Products Lack of an approval mechanism for new chemical excipients is a barrier to innovation in drug delivery 27

USP Asks USP wants to work with the FDA and sponsors to develop new and update existing monographs that the FDA and industry can support. New monographs: USP would also like to fill in the gaps to develop monographs for excipients currently in use, but without a monograph, for example: Poly (dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (50:50 m.w. 46,000) Posted on the USP website in the Priority New Monographs (http://www.usp.org/get-involved/partner/modernization-priority-new-monograph-lists) Up-to-Date initiative: List of official monographs posted on the USP website in the Modernization list (http://www.usp.org/get-involved/partner/modernization-priority-new-monograph-lists) 28

USP Asks Challenges to developing Novel Excipients: New excipients evaluated only in the context of NDA/BLA No independent evaluation procedure Entire application could be rejected if excipient is unacceptable to FDA Barrier to development of new excipients/new delivery systems ( e.g., Biologics) Adds uncertainty to the drug application process Excipient is only permitted for use at the level used in that drug and for that particular route of administration. Patient/Public health impact: Potential new classes of APIs that can treat as yet untreated diseases and meet unmet patient needs are being identified. The drug products that use these APIs will only reach the marketplace if novel excipients designed to overcome undesirable physical and/or chemical properties are available to enable their effective delivery

FDA/USP Workshop, Feb 27-28, 2017 Videos Videos from most of the sessions are available on the USP Excipients website: 30