Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2 Department of Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Similar documents
Premature progesterone elevation impairs implantation and live birth rates in GnRH-agonist IVF/ICSI cycles

Factors influencing serum progesterone level on triggering day in stimulated in vitro fertilization cycles

Interpreting follicular Progesterone: Late follicular Progesterone to Estradiol ratio is not influenced by protocols or gonadotropins used

A Tale of Three Hormones: hcg, Progesterone and AMH

Serum progesterone levels on the day of hcg trigger and ICSI outcome: a retrospective observational cohort study

Bei Xu, Ph.D., Zhou Li, Ph.D., Hanwang Zhang, Ph.D., Lei Jin, Ph.D., Yufeng Li, Ph.D., Jihui Ai, Ph.D., and Guijin Zhu, M.D.

(1.,, ) (2.,,, )

Luteal phase rescue after GnRHa triggering Progesterone and Estradiol

Circulating Progesterone Levels and Ongoing Pregnancy Rates in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Cycles in Assisted Reproduction Techniques

IVF (,, ) : (HP-hMG) - (IVF- ET) : GnRH, HP-hMG (HP-hMG )57, (rfsh )140, (Gn)

Does triggering ovulation by 5000 IU of uhcg affect ICSI outcome? *

In vitro fertilization outcome in frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in women with elevated progesterone level on the day of HCG injection: An RCT

Assisted Reproduction Unit, American Hospital of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

Clinical consequences of ovarian stimulation in assisted conception and in PCOS Al-Inany, H.G.

Menstruation-free interval and ongoing pregnancy in IVF using GnRH antagonists

2013 Sep.; 24(3):

Herjan Coelingh Bennink, M.D.:j: Andre Van Steirteghem, M.D., Ph.D.* Paul Devroey, M.D., Ph.D.*

Late follicular progesterone to estradiol ratio is not influenced by protocols or gonadotropins used

Risk of premature luteinization in IVF cycles and its impact on clinical pregnancy rate

Progesterone and clinical outcomes

Clinical Study Clinical Effects of a Natural Extract of Urinary Human Menopausal Gonadotrophin in Normogonadotropic Infertile Patients

Premature progesterone rise negatively correlated with live birth rate in IVF cycles with GnRH agonist: an analysis of 2,566 cycles

Prognosticating ovarian reserve by the new ovarian response prediction index

The serum estradiol/oocyte ratio in patients with breast cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins

FOAD AZEM, JOSEPH B. LESSING, MIRA MALCOV, DALIT BEN-YOSEF, BENI ALMOG, & AMI AMIT

Preovulatory progesterone concentration associates significantly to follicle number and LH concentration but not to pregnancy rate

lbt lab tests t Conrolled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Dr Soheila Ansaripour

E.G. Papanikolaou 1,2,3, *, G. Pados 1,3, G. Grimbizis 1,3, E. Bili 1,3, L. Kyriazi 3, N.P. Polyzos 4,P.Humaidan 5,H.Tournaye 4,andB.

Original Article Impact of estrogen-to-oocyte ratio on live birth rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

Intérêt de l hcg et induction de l ovulation. Christophe Blockeel, MD, PhD Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels, Belgium

Principles of Ovarian Stimulation

EHY Ng, WSB Yeung, PC Ho. Introduction

Agonist versus antagonist in ICSI cycles: a randomized trial and cost effectiveness analysis Badrawi A, Zaki S, Al-Inany H, Ramzy A M, Hussein M

Comparison of serum and follicular fluid hormone levels with recombinant and urinary human chorionic gonadotropin during in vitro fertilization

The impact of HMG on follicular fluid hormone levels, embryo quality and IVF outcome

2015 Mar.; 26(1):

Advanced age, poor responders and the role of LH supplementation. C. Alviggi University Federico II, Naples, Italy

Rafael A. Cabrera, M.D., Laurel Stadtmauer, M.D., Ph.D., Jacob F. Mayer, Ph.D., William E. Gibbons, M.D., and Sergio Oehninger, M.D., Ph.D.

Milan Reljič, Ph.D., Veljko Vlaisavljević, Ph.D., Vida Gavrić, M.Sc., Borut Kovačič, Ph.D.,

Dr. Ernesto Bosch Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad Valencia, Spain. Declared no potential conflict of interest

COMPARING AMH, AFC AND FSH FOR PREDICTING HIGH OVARIAN RESPONSE IN WOMEN UNDERGOING ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL

(BMI)=18.0~24.9 kg/m 2 ;

The effect of adding oral oestradiol to progesterone as luteal phase support in ART cycles a randomized controlled study

Ovarian response in three consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles

A Case of Pregnancy Using Recombinant Follicle Stimulating Hormone and Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist

LOW RESPONDERS. Poor Ovarian Response, Por

Endometrial Preparation for Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) Zitao Liu, MD, PhD New Hope Fertility Center, NY

Timur Giirgan, M.D.* Bulent Urman, M.D. Hakan Yarali, M.D. Hakan E. Duran, M.D.

Hongjuan Ye 1*, Hui Tian 1, Wen He 2, Qifeng Lyu 2, Yanping Kuang 2, Qiuju Chen 2* and Lihua Sun 1*

Infertility Clinical Guideline

Highly purified hmg versus recombinant FSH in ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists a randomized study

IVF Protocols: Hyper & Hypo-Responders, Implantation

In Vitro Fertilization in Clomiphene-Resistant Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Estradiol Level on Day 2 and Day of Trigger: A Potential Predictor of the IVF-ET Success

Neil Goodman, MD, FACE

Fixed Schedule for in vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer: Comparison of Outcome between the Short and the Long Protocol

Original Article Effects of a low hcg dose of 2000 IU on clinical outcomes of high-responder women undergoing IVF/ICSI

Vanessa N. Weitzman, M.D., Lawrence Engmann, M.D., Andrea DiLuigi, M.D., Donald Maier, M.D., John Nulsen, M.D., and Claudio Benadiva, M.D.

Središnja medicinska knjižnica

Milder is better? Advantages and disadvantages of "mild" ovarian stimulation for human in vitro fertilization

LUTEAL PHASE SUPPORT. Doç. Dr. Nafiye Yılmaz. Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi

Does previous response to clomifene citrate influence the selection of gonadotropin dosage given in subsequent superovulation treatment cycles?

International Journal of Women s Health and Reproduction Sciences Vol. 6, No. 2, April 2018, ISSN

Relation of progesterone and luteinizing hormone serum levels and Ultrasound endometrium criteria with intracytoplasmatic sperm injection outcome

A Tale of Three Hormones: hcg, Progesterone and AMH

ENDOCRINE CHARACTERISTICS OF ART CYCLES

No influence of the indication of freeze-all strategy on subsequent outcome to frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)

2017 United HealthCare Services, Inc.

Pituitary down-regulation in IVF/ICSI: consequences for treatment regimens Mochtar, M.H.

The duration of pre-ovulatory serum progesterone elevation before hcg administration affects the outcome of IVF/ICSI cycles

- Meta. : (rfsh); (ufsh); (IVF); : R711.6 : A : X(2015) : hmg( FSH LH) [ufsh, (ufsh-p) (ufsh-hp)] (rfsh) [1] 80, rfsh, 90, :

Raoul Orvieto. The Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel. Declared no potential conflict of interest

Effect of HCG-day serum progesterone and oestradiol concentrations on pregnancy outcomes in GnRH agonist cycles

Hana Park, Chung-Hoon Kim, Eun-Young Kim, Jei-Won Moon, Sung-Hoon Kim, Hee-Dong Chae, Byung-Moon Kang

Treatment of Poor Responders

Accuracy of a Direct Progesterone Immunoassay

in vitro fertilization

Original Investigation 133

IVM in PCOS patients. Introduction (1) Introduction (2) Michael Grynberg René Frydman

Mahnaz Ashrafi Kiandokht Kiani Afsaneh Ghasemi Fatemeh Rastegar Maryam Nabavi

Article Effect of cetrorelix dose on premature LH surge during ovarian stimulation

Ovarian cyst formation following GnRH agonist administration in IVF cycles: incidence and impact

% Oocyte Donation Pregnancyes (days 3)

Honorary Fellow of the Royal College of Obs. & Gyn. First Indian to receive FIGO s Distinguished Merit Award for Services towards women s health.

Is it the seed or the soil? Arthur Leader, MD, FRCSC

Open Access. Mohamed K. Moustafa 1,2, Ahmed R. Abdelwahed 2, Ibrhium Abosekena 2, Shokry Abdelazim 2, Ahmed M. Abou-Setta 3 and Hesham G.

Liyan Duan 1, Shihua Bao 1, Kunming Li 1, Xiaoming Teng 1, Ling Hong 1 and Xiaoyu Zhao 2. Abstract. Introduction

Ivf day 6 estradiol level

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 22 September 2010

AOGS COMMENTARY SHAHAR KOL 1, ROY HOMBURG 2,3, BIRGIT ALSBJERG 4 & PETER HUMAIDAN 5. Abstract

Female Reproductive Physiology. Dr Raelia Lew CREI, FRANZCOG, PhD, MMed, MBBS Fertility Specialist, Melbourne IVF

International Journal of Reproductive Medicine & Gynecology

Utility of Estradiol as a Predictive Marker of Ovarian Hyper Stimulation Syndrome

The Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between GnRH Agonist Long Protocol and GnRH Antagonist Short Protocol in Oocyte Donation Cycles

Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University School of Medicine, Valencia University, Valencia, Spain

Evaluation of ovarian response prediction according to age and serum AMH levels in IVF cycles: a retrospective analysis

Use of clomiphene to prevent premature luteinizing hormone surge during controlled ovarian hyper stimulation

Duration of progesterone-in-oil support after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a randomized, controlled trial

Transcription:

Original Article Serum progesterone concentrations before and after h u m a n c h o r i o n i c gonadotropin triggering and invitro fertilization : Intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle outcome in long gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist protocol Mona M. Shaban MD 1, Yasmin Bassiouny 1, Mahmoud Soliman Amr S Alahwany 2 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2 Department of Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the impact of serum progesterone concentrations before and after HCG triggering on IVF/ICSIcycle outcomes in long GnRHa protocol. Patients and Methods: This is a single-center prospective observational cohort study, in which 102 IVF/ICSI patients with normal cycle day 2 basal hormones were recruited and underwent ovarian stimulation using the long GnRHa protocol. Serum progesterone on the day of HCG trigger; one day after, progesterone/estradiol was assessed and correlated with pregnancy rates, the total dose of used gonadotropins, serum estradiol level on day of trigger, the number of collected oocytes, the number of metaphase II oocytes and the quality of transferred embryos. Results: 96 women were included in the analysis. In our study, the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to gain more diagnostic accuracy. Our data according to ROC analysis showed that the P levels on the day of hcg trigger, and its levels one day after and P/E2 on the day of hcg trigger had no role in prediction of clinical pregnancy rates. There was significant correlation between the serum progesterone levels before and after HCG triggering with the total dose of gonadotropins used. They also correlated strongly with serum estradiol level on day of trigger, the number of collected oocytes and the number of metaphase II oocytes. Conclusion: Peri-ovulatory serum progesterone concentrations cannot predict pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI cycles using long GnRHa protocol. Key Words: Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist, IVF/ICSI, pregnancy rate, periovulatory, serum progesterone concentrations. Received: 02 December 2017, Accepted: 23 December 2017 Corresponding Author: Mona Shaban, M.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, Tel.: 01001078586, E-mail: drmonashaban@gmail.com. ISSN: 2090-7265, February 2018, Vol.8, No.1 INTRODUCTION In humans, ovarian steroidogensis occurs according to the two-cell/two-gonadotropin theory; cholesterol is converted to progesterone (P) in the granulosa cells under the effect of follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) which passes to theca cells to be converted to androgens under the effect of luteinizing hormone (LH). Then, androgens pass to the granulosa cells to be converted to estradiol (E2) [1]. Premature luteinization (PL) is defined as premature elevation of serum P in the late follicular phase before the human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) administration. The introduction of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for IVF/ICSI cycles prevents both immunoactive and bioactive LH surges in 95-98% of patients [2]. Therefore, the term PL for subtle P rise in COS for IVF/ICSI cycles has proven to be misleading because it is not associated with LH rise, although it was reported to occur in 2-40% of the cycles [3]. Many hypotheses were postulated to explain the premature subtle P rise in COS, primarily the increase in the number of follicles with increased production of P without the balancing effect of LH activity to convert it to E2 in the granulose cells, secondly the accumulation of LH from human menopausal gonadotropin (hmg) and finally increased sensitivity of granulosa LH receptors to gonadotropins [4]. The cut of value of subtle P rise on the day of HCG is arbitral in most of the studies ranging from 0.8-2 ng/ml ; Younis et al 2001 defined PL as progesterone/ estradiol (P/E2) >1 on the day of HCG administration to differentiate between P from immature follicles and that from healthy mature follicles [5]. The impact of subtle P rise on the day of HCG administration on IVF/ICSI outcome is controversial; some studies showed that it has no association with Personal non-commercial use only. EBX copyright 2017. All rights reserved DOI: 10.21608/ebwhj.2018.6215 138

Shaban et al. pregnancy rates (PRs) [4, 6-10], whereas others showed that it has negative impact [11-14]. The aim of our study is to assess the relation of periovulatory serum P concentration, to assess the impact of an extended window of progesterone elevation and P/E2 on day of HCG injection in IVF/ICSI cycle outcomes with long GnRHa protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS A single center prospective observational cohort study which was conducted in the IVF unit of Cairo University Hospital, Egypt. One hundred and two infertile women eligible for IVF/ICSI and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Cairo University and consent forms were obtained from the patients after they were informed about the study and its outcomes. Inclusion criteria: Woman's age from 20-35 years, normal hormonal assay on cycle day 2 (FSH<10 miu/ml, LH<10 miu/ml, E2 level<60 pg/ml) and eligible for IVF/ICSI. Exclusion criteria: History of previous adenexal masses, endometriosis, PCOS (polycystic ovary syndrome). Protocol for ovarian stimulation: The standard long GnRHa protocol was used for all patients; triptorelin acetate 0.1 mg (Decapeptyl, Ferring Pharmaceuticals) was given once daily SC starting from day 21 of the preceding cycle till the day of HCG injection. Gonadotropins in the form of human menopausal gonadotrophin (hmg) (Merional, IBSA, Institut Biochimique SA) or purified FSH (follitropin beta, Puregon; NV Organon, Oss, the Netherlands) were given from the 2nd day of menstruation after checking down regulation. The starting dose ranged from 150-225 IU depending on basal FSH level, antral follicle count (AFC), maternal age, BMI and previous response to COS. Serial trans-vaginal ultrasound and serum E2 were done to assess follicular growth starting from day 6 of the cycle and onward, with adjustments of gonadotropin dose based on patient's response. Once 3 or more leading follicles reach 18mm, HCG 10,000IU (Choriomon, IBSA, Institut Biochimique SA) was given IM. Oocyte retrieval was performed 35 hours from HCG injection followed by IVF/ICSI. Assessment of embryo quality: The assessment was done after 42 to 48 hrs after IVF/ICSI according to embryo morphology (shape of blastomere and degree of fragmentation). Grade I: excellent embryos (intact and symmetrical blastomere with no fragmentation). Grade II: good embryos (asymmetrical cleavage or < 20% embryo fragmentation). Grade III: fair embryos (embryo fragmentation 20-50%). Grade IV: poor embryos (embryo fragmentation > 50%). Embryo transfer (ET) was done 3 days following ovum pick up using labotec catheter (Labotec, Gottingen Germany) with ultrasound guidance. All patients were given progesterone vaginal pessary (Cyclogest, Alpharma, UK) 400 mg twice daily from the day of egg collection till the day of the pregnancy test. Serum ß-HCG was done 14 days after ET and ultra sound imaging was done 2 weeks after positive ß-HCG to determine viability and number of gestational sacs. Progesterone measurement: Serum progestrone was measured on the day of HCG administration and one day after. Samples were tested with electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) (Cobas e411, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), which had a sensitivity of 0.3 ng/dl progesterone. Instructions in the Operator's Manual were followed for preparation, setup, dilutions, and adjustment, assay and quality control procedures. The inter-assay coefficient of variation was less than 10% and the intra-assay variation was less than 15%. In our study P measurements had no impact on patient management or decision making. P/E2 ratio was calculated as P (ng/ml) 1,000/E2 (pg/ml) [10]. Primary outcome: Identification of the serum progesterone threshold measured on the day of HCG administration and one day after which may be associated with detrimental cycle outcome. Clinical pregnancy was considered with a positive serum ß-HCG with an ultrasound evidence of a gestational sac. Secondary outcome: To examine other factors related to P elevation as dose of gonadotropins used for COS, number of oocytes retrieved, number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes, E2 level on day of HCG administration and quality of transferred embryos. Statistical methods: Data were statistically described in terms of mean ±standard deviation (± SD), median and range, or frequencies (number of cases) and percentages when appropriate. Correlation between various variables was done using Pearson moment correlation equation for linear relation in normally distributed variables and Spearman rank correlation equation for non-normal variables. Accuracy was represented using the terms sensitivity, and specificity. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimum cut off value for the studied 139

SERUM PROGESTERONE LEVELS AND ICSI OUTCOME diagnostic markers. p values less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations were done using computer programs SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) version 15 for Microsoft Windows. RESULTS One hundred and two patients were enrolled in our study, 6 patients were excluded because of cancelled ET. One case for failure of fertilization, the rest 5 cases because of the risk of ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome (OHSS) and all embryos were cryopreserved for transfer in a future cycle; thus 96 patients had ET and were enrolled in the analysis (figure A). Fig. b: Receiver operating characteristic curve for serum progesterone concentration on the day of HCG for the prediction of clinical pregnancy rate. Fig. a: The recruitment flow chart of patients who were included in the study. Fig. c: Receiver operating characteristic curve for serum progesterone concentration on the day after HCG for the prediction of clinical pregnancy rate. The mean patient's age was 28.9 ± 5.7 years; the mean duration of infertility was 4.8 ± 3.6 years. Sixty nine cases (71.9%) had 1ry infertility and 27 cases (28.1%) had 2ry infertility. Indications for ICSI were: mild to moderate male factor in 72 cases (75%), tubal factor in 13 cases (13.5%) and unexplained infertility in 11 cases (11.4%). The mean serum P level on the day of HCG trigger was 0.7 ± 0.6 ng/ml and the mean serum P on the day after was 3.6 ± 2.9 ng/ml. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for the values of serum P on the day of HCG injection, one day after triggering and P/E2 on the day of HCG injection in conception, non conception cycles is shown in figure (b, c, d).the area u nder the curve was 0.906 with 95% CI: 0.391-0.623, 0.599 with 95% CI: 0.41-0.64 and 0.979 with 95% CI: 0.383-0.620, respectively which was not predictive of clinical pregnancy. Fig. d: Receiver operating characteristic curve for serum progesterone /estradiol ratio on the day of HCG for the prediction of clinical pregnancy rate. The cycle characteristics and outcomes are presented in table 1. 140

Shaban et al. Table 1: Cycle characteristics and outcomes in our group of patients Characteristic/Outcome Mean Standard deviation Duration of hmg treatment (days) Total doses of gonadotropin (IU) E2 levels on HCG day (pg/ml) Progesterone levels before triggering (ng/ ml) Progesterone levels after triggering (ng/ml) Endometrial thickness (mm) Number of collected oocytes 11.5 2860.5 4864.8 0.7 3.6 10.9 9.6 1.5 668.3 4784.9 0.6 2.9 1.5 5.7 Number of MII oocytes 6.6 4.4 Number of fertilized oocytes 5.7 3.6 Number of good embryos transferred 2.4 1.1 Clinical pregnancy rate (n/n, %) 41/96, 42.7 Early miscarriage rate (n/n, %) 6/96, 6.3 E2: Estradiol; HCG: human chorionic gonadotropin; hmg: human menopausal gonadotropin. The serum P level before trigger and one day after trigger was significantly correlated with the total dose of gonadotropins used for COS (r= 0.233, p=0.023 and r= 0.241, p=0.018 respectively). There was a strong correlation between serum P level before trigger and serum E2 level on day of trigger ( r= 0.340, p=0.001), numbe r of collected oocytes ( r= 0.318, p=0.002) and nu mber of MII oocytes (r= 0.305, p=0.002). There also was a strong correlation between serum P level one day after trigger and se rum E2 level on day of trigger (r= 0.472, p=<0.001), numbe r of collected oocytes (r= 0.399, p=<0.001) and nu mber of MII oocytes (r= 0.312, p=0.002). There was no correlation between serum P level before trigger or one day after trigger with the quality of transferred embryo s [ (p = 0.246, r= 0.097) (p =0.291, r=0.088)] respectively. There was no relation of statistical significance between serum P level before trigger or one day after trigger and the type of used gonadotropins (hmg or purified FSH) (p= 0.739, 0.674 respectiv ely ) or the miscarriage rate (p 0.739, 0.674 respectively). DISCUSSION The pathogenesis of the subtle P in the late follicular phase of cycles stimulated with GnRHa and gonadotropins is still poorly understood and its impact on pregnancy outcome is still debatable. The studies which showed there is deleterious effect on PRs attributed that to the impairment of implantation due to endometrial secretory advancement rather than the affection of oocyte and embryo quality. Other studies showed that it had no impact on pregnancy rate. [4, 6-10]. Pre HCG progesterone rise was defined by many studies that serum P more than 0.8-2 ng/ml [3, 6, 13, 14], however in most of these studies, the threshold for P was demonstrated arbitrary. The relation of peri-ovulatory serum progesterone and PRs is little studied, however Prien et al. 1994 stated that the threefold rise in serum P following HCG administration can predict pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI cycles [15]. The aim of our work is to study the impact of an extended window of elevated serum P on IVF/ICSI cycle outcome. In our study, the receiver-operating characteristic 141

SERUM PROGESTERONE LEVELS AND ICSI OUTCOME (ROC) analysis was used to gain more diagnostic accuracy; which were used in a very few number of similar studies. Our data according to ROC analysis showed that the P levels on the day of HCG trigger, and levels one day after ; and P/E2 on the day of HCG trigger had no effect in the prediction of clinical pregnancy rates which is in agreement with many previous studies which studied either P levels on the day of hcg trigger or one day after [4, 6, 7, 10, 16]. Other studies showed that there is an inverse relationship between elevated levels of serum P on day of HCG administration and pregnancy rates [5, 11, 16-18], this difference may be attributed to different methods of P assessment, different cutoff values of progesterone, different patients' responses and different stimulation protocols. Doldi et al. showed that elevated serum P is associated with increased PRs, they explained this by stating that elevated serum P is associated with increased ovarian response and increased number of available embryos for transfer [9]. The serum P level before trigger and on the day after was strongly correlated with serum E2 level on day of trigger, the number of collected oocytes and the number of MII oocytes which goes in agreement with many studies [4,19], because the more the recruited follicles the more the production of P from the granulosa cells. There was no correlation between serum P before trigger or one day after with quality of transferred embryos this agrees with many previous studies [7, 8, 18]. Legro et al. and Silverberg et al. found that there was even improved embryo quality with elevated serum P levels on the day of HCG administration in donor oocytes cycles and also in frozen thawed ET cycles [20, 21]. These findings favor that serum P levels have no role in oocyte or embryo quality. In our study, serum P levels before trigger and one day after were significantly correlated with the total dose of gonadotropins used for COS which is consistent with Filicori et al., 2002 [22]. While, Huang et al. 2012 found no correlation between serum P on day of HCG administration and the total dose of gonadotropins used for COS; but they used step down policy of gonadotropins in their study, which may explain this finding [18]. Several studies showed no statistical significance between P levels on the day of HCG administration or one day after and the type of used gonadotropins [12], which is similar to our findings. CONCLUSION In conclusion, peri-ovulatory serum P levels and P/ E2 on day of HCG injection cannot predict PRs in IVF/ ICSI cycles using GnRHa long protocol; but correlate strongly with serum E2 level on day of trigger, the number of collected oocytes and the number of MII oocytes. They should not be used to alter physicians decision making in treatment IVF/ICSI cycles. ACKNOWLEDGMENT To all staff of IVF unit of Cairo university hospital, Egypt. CONFLICT OF INTEREST There are no conflicts of interest. REFERENCES 1. Moon YS, Tsang BK, Simpson C, Armstrong DT. 17beta-Estradiol biosynthesis in cultured granulosa and thecal cells of human ovarian follicles: stimulation by follicle-stimulating hormon e. J C l i n Endocrinol Metab. 1978; 47(2): 263-267. 2. Penzias AS, Shamma FN, Gutmann JN, Jones EE, DeCherney AH, Lavy G. Nafarelin versus leuprolide in ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization: a randomized clinical trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79(5 (Pt 1)): 739-742. 3. Ubaldi E, Camus M, Smitz J, bennink HC, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Premature luteinization In in vitro fertilization cycles using gonadotropinreleasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) a n d G n R H - a a n d urinary FSH. Fertil Steril. 1996; 66(2): 275-280. 4. Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Papanikolaou E, Bontis J, Devroey P,Tarlatzis BC. Is progesterone elevation on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration associated with the probability of pregnancy in in vitro fertilization? A systematic review and meta-analysis.hum Reprod Update. 2007; 13(4): 343-355. 5. Younis JS, Matilsky M, Radin O, Ben-Ami M. Increased progesterone/ estradiol ratio in the late follicular phase could be related to low ovarian reserve in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles with a long gonadotropinreleasin g h o r m o n e a g o n ist. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76(2): 294-299. 6. Givens CR, Schriock ED, Dandekar PV, Martin MC. Elevated serum progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration do not predict outcome in assisted reproduction cycles. Fertil Steril. 1994; 62(5): 1011-1017. 142

Shaban et al. 7. Bustillo M, Stern JJ, Coulam CB. Serum progesterone at the time of human chorionic gonadotrophin does not predict pregnancy in in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10(11): 2862-2867. 8. Hofmann GE, Khoury J, Johnson CA, Thie J, Scott RT Jr. Premature luteinization during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilizationembryo transfer has no impact on pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril. 1996; 66(6): 980-986. 9. Doldi N, Marsiglio E, Destefani A, Gessi A, Merati G, Ferrari A. Elevated serum progesterone on the day of HCG administration in IVF is associated with a higher pregnancy rate in polycystic ovary syndrome.hum Reprod. 1999; 14(3): 601-605. 10. Martinez F, Coroleu B, Clua E, Tur R, Buxaderas R, Parera N, et al. Serum progesterone concentrations on the day of HCG administration cannot predict pregnancy in assisted reproduction cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004; 8(2): 183-190. 11. Fanchin R, de Ziegler D, Taieb J, Hazout A, Frydman R. Premature elevation of plasma progesterone alters pregnancy rates of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59(5): 1090-1094. 12. Bosch E, Valencia I, Escudero E, Crespo J, Simo n C, Remohı J, et al. Premature luteinization during gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles and its relationship with in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80(6): 1444-1449. 13. Levy MJ, Smotrich DB, Widra EA, Sagoskin AW, Murray DL, Hall JL. The predictive value of serum progesterone and 17-OH progesterone levels on in vitro fertilization outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995; 12(3): 161-166. 14. Liu L, Z h o u F, L i n X, Li T, Tong X, Zhu H, et al. Recurrent IVF failure is associated with elevated progesterone on the day of hcg admini st r a t i o n. E u r J O b st e t Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 171(1): 78-83. 15. Prien SD, Canez MS, Messer RH. Increases in progesterone after human chorionic gonadotropin administration may predict cycle outcome in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1994; 62(5): 1066-1068. 16. Burns W, Witz C, Klein N, Silverberg K, Schenken R. Serum progesterone concentrations on the day after human chorionic administration and progesterone/oocyte ratios predict in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994 ;11(1): 17-23. 17. Nayak S, Ochalski ME, Fu B, Wakim KM, Chu TJ, Dong X, et al. Progesterone level at oocyte retrieval predicts in vitro fertilization success in short antagonist protocol: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(3): 676-682. 18. Huang CC, Lien YR, Chen HF, Chen MJ, Shieh CJ, Yao YL, et al. The duration of pre-ovulatory serum progesterone elevation before hcg administration affects the outcome of IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(7): 2036-2045. 19. Xu B, Li Z, Zhang H, Jin L, Li Y, Ai J, et al. Serum progesterone level effects on the outcome of in vitro fertilization in patients with different ovarian response: an analysis of more than 10,000 cycles. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(6): 1321-1327. 20. Legro RS, Ary BA, Paulson RJ, Stanczyk FZ, Sauer MV. Premature luteinization as detected by serum progesterone is associated with higher pregnancy rate in donor oocyte in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1993; 8(9): 1506-1511. 21. Silverberg KM, Burns WN, Martin M, Shenken RS, Olive DL. Elevated serum progesterone level on the day of hcg administration in in-vitro fertilization cycles do not adversely affect embryo quality. Fertil Steril. 1994; 61(3): 508-513. 22. Filicori M, Cognigni GE, Pocognoli P, Tabarelli C, Spetolli D, Taraborrelli S, et al. Modulation of folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis in women by graded menotrophin administration. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(8): 2009-2015 143