EHDI Conference 2009 Addison, TX

Similar documents
Executive Summary. JCIH Year 2007 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs

Historical Perspective. JCIH 1973 Position Statement. JCIH Goals. JCIH 1982 Position Statement

Referral Rates and Costs of Our Modified Two-Step Newborn Hearing Screening Program at a Japanese Perinatal Center

Supplement. Judith S. Gravel Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI): The Role of the Medical Home

KANSAS GUIDELINES FOR INFANT AUDIOLOGIC ASSESSMENT

Risk Factors for Late-Onset Hearing Loss in Children

Supplement. Karl R. White National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management, Utah State University, Logan

5. Hospitals will provide the family with a copy of the Michigans Community Program: Information for Parents (MDCH /01). Copies can be ordered,

Improving Loss to Follow-up Rates Diagnostic Center Guidelines for 2011

The National Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) Landscape:

Impact of the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program on the Detection of Hearing Loss at Birth Michigan,

CHILDREN WITH CMV: DON T FORGET THE IMPORTANCE OF EARLY INTERVENTION. Paula Pittman, PhD Director, Utah Parent Infant Program for the Deaf

Detection of middle ear dysfunction using wideband acoustic tests in newborn hearing screening and diagnostic follow-up

Wheeler, K.S. M.Cl.Sc. (Aud) Candidate School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, U.W.O

Research findings Current trends in early intervention How can you make a difference?

Newborn Hearing Screening Speeds Diagnosis and Access to Intervention by Months DOI: /jaaa

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. The Distribution of Risk Factors among High Risk Infants who Failed at Hearing Screening

Newborn Screening and Middle Ear Problems

Some Permanent Hearing Loss is Missed When Switched Ear Passes are Combined for Determining Screening Results

Ototoxicity monitoring as part of risk monitoring in the EHDI system

Hearing Loss, Deaf Culture and ASL Interpreters By Laura Jacobsen (4/2014)

Effective factors on Auditory Brainstem Response test in Newborns

Hear Now! ND EHDI Announces the release of North Dakota s Early Intervention Module. Inside this issue:

Disclosures. Objectives 2/29/2016. Bradley Golner M.D. FAAP. AzEHDI chapter champion AAP EHDI leadership team

A SUPPLEMENT TO AUDIOLOGY TODAY NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2007

Supplement. Judith E. Widen University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City. Jean L. Johnson University of Hawaiì, Honolulu

Efficacy of TEOAEs and BERA as screening tools for deafness in newborn

A PROGRAMMATIC ANALYSIS OF A NEWBORN HEARING SCREENING PROGRAM FOR EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT

(OAEs) for. Steven D. Smith, Au.D.

EHDI Conference 2009 Addision, TX

Paediatric Whitepaper

Instructions. 1. About how many babies are born or admitted to this hospital each year?

The findings and conclusions in this presentation

Hearing Screening, Diagnostics and Intervention

Newborn Hearing Screening: Success and Challenges

PURPOSE OF THIS PRESENTATION GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE: FACULTY GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE: OUTCOMES

James W. Hall III, Ph.D.

Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Newborn Hearing Screening Using Behavioral Audiometric Threshold as a Gold Standard*

Thresholds of Tone Burst Auditory Brainstem Responses for Infants and Young Children with Normal Hearing in Taiwan

Outline ANATOMY OF EAR. All about Cochlear implants/why does this child not have a Cochlear Implant?

ABC s of Pediatric Audiology

Jackson Roush, PhD University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

Map of Medicine National Library for Health

OUTCOMES OF CHILDREN WHO ARE HARD OF HEARING

JFK-HCP Webinar - Partnering to Support Children with Hearing Loss - 2/27/14 1

NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Copyright (c) 2011 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law

Hearing loss is the most frequently occurring congenital

AUTOMATED AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE INFORMATION AND GUIDELINES FOR SCREENING HEARING IN BABIES

Emissions are low-intensity sounds that may be detected in the external ear canal by a microphone

EHDI: An Amazing Journey

Faye P. McCollister, EdD University of Alabama, Emeritus National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management

(Otoacoustic Emissions and Automated ABR)

ISPUB.COM. Newborn Hearing Screening: Recommendations and Rationale U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. United States Preventive Services Task Force

Original Articles JKY YU, IHY NG, ACS KAM, TKC WONG, ECM WONG, MCF TONG, HC YU, KM YU. Abstract. Key words

the truly automated all-in-one hearing screener

GSI AUDIOscreener OAE AND ABR HEARING SCREENING

Developmental Hearing and Auditory Milestones. Presented by : Amy Packer & Marilyn Nelson

What I Hope You Will Remember From This Presentation

Audiology 101 SOFT HIGH PITCH LOUD. How do we hear? Ear to the Brain. Main parts of the Ear

Teleaudiology: Providing Hearing Assessments to Infants and Children Living in Remote and Rural Communities.

Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Programs, Pediatricians, Audiologists & School Nurses use AuDX Screeners

Iowa EHDI A Work in Progress. Coordinating Council for Hearing Services November 24, 2008

Targeted hearing screening in newborns

Early Detection of Deafness & Neonatal Hearing Screening Dr. Abdul Monem Alshaikh

The Evolution of Early HearingDetection and Intervention Programs in the United States

State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment. Permanent Administrative Regulations

Later-amplified NOW Later-amplified THEN Early compared to pre-unhs Delayed onset hearing loss Less hearing loss Mild hearing loss Average age of ID

Guidelines for Primary Care and Medical Home Providers

I. Project Identifier Information

Newborn hearing screening - well baby protocol Paediatrics > Screening > Newborn hearing screening

Contents. Foreword by James W. Hall III, PhD and Virginia Ramachandran, Aud, Series Editors Preface

COACHingto improve NHS Outcomes: Coalition of Ohio Audiologists and Childrens Hospitals

Inconsistency in Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programmes: a Systematic Review

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention

3/20/2017. D. Richard Kang, MD, FACS, FAAP Pediatric Otolaryngology Director, ENT Institute Boys Town National Research Hospital

CHHA-NL POSITION PAPER. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program (UNHSP) in Newfoundland and Labrador

ROADMAP TO SPOKEN LANGUAGE C H R I S T I N E Y O S H I N A G A - I T A N O, P H. D. U N I V E R S I T Y O F C O L O R A D O, B O U L D E R

A PARENT S GUIDE TO DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EARLY INTERVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS

The Status of EHDI Programs in the USA

A Guide to. Otoacoustic Emissions (OAEs) for Physicians.

universal newborn hearing Screening

NEWBORN HEARING SCREENING AND WHY IT S IMPORTANT

to the child and the family, based on the child's and family's abilities and needs. The IFSP needs to address the communication needs of the child and

A Guide to. Otoacoustic Emissions (OAEs) for Otolaryngologists.

HEALTH VISITOR INFORMATION PACK

Newborn hearing screening - NICU or SCBU protocol Paediatrics > Screening > Newborn hearing screening

AUDIOLOGICAL TESTING OF COCHLEAR IMPLANTED CHILDREN IN AN EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAMME IN SOUTH AFRICA

EHDI National EHDI Meeting

Christine Yoshinaga-Itano, Ph.D. Professor University of Colorado, Boulder Department of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences Allison Sedey, Ph.D.

Automated Auditory Brainstem Response: A Proposal for an Initial Test for Healthy Newborn Hearing Screening with a Focus on the Test Time

INPATIENT SCREENING PROTOCOL

OAE Test System. Screener PLUS. Diagnostic PLUS. with 4 frequency DPOAE testing Protocols

OAE Screening in Healthcare Settings: A Pilot Project. Terry E. Foust, AuD William Eiserman, PhD Lenore Shisler, MS

The Colorado Newborn Hearing Screening Project, : On the Threshold of Effective Population-Based Universal Newborn Hearing Screening

Newborn hearing screening in Western Australia

Reducing Lost to Follow Up Percentages In EHDI Programs: The Role of Audiology

ECHOLAB. Screening and Clinical Modality. User Programmable Protocols. Otoacoustic Emissions System TEOAE - DPOAE - ABR - AABR

Just What Do Your Pediatric Audiologists Know?

CASE REPORT. AUDITORY NEUROPATHY WITH BILATERAL BAT EARS A RARE CASE REPORT A. Sivakumar 1, V. Narendrakumar 2

Transcription:

Update on the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Activities EHDI Conference 2009 Addison, TX Judith Widen - University of Kansas Medical Center - Kansas City, KS Judith Harrison, AG Bell Association Washington, DC Al Mehl, Betty Vohr, Brandt Culpepper, Michelle King,

Current Members AG Bell Judy Harrison, MA American Academy of Pediatrics Albert Mehl, MD Betty Vohr, MD American Academy of Audiology Christie Yoshinaga-Itano Itano, Ph.D - CHAIR Alison Grimes, AuD Phil Bongiorno (AAA Staff)

Members, cont. American Academy of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Patrick Brookhouser, MD Stephen Epstein, MD American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Brandt Culpepper, Ph.D. Mary Pat Moeller, Ph.D.

Members, cont. Council of Education of the Deaf Beth Benedict, PhD Bobbie Scoggins, EdD Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs for State Health and Welfare Agencies Michelle King, AuD Beth Martin, MA

Supporting Organizations Boys Town National Research Hospital Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Maternal and Child Health Bureau National Institute for Deafness and Other Communication Disorders

Recent Activities Stakeholder s Meeting Early Intervention Task Force Assortment of presentations on JCIH recommendations AAP Future of Pediatrics meeting EHDI in the Medical Home EAR Foundation State conferences and conventions

JCIH 2007 Statement JCIH 2007 Statement Pediatrics 898[1].pdf ExecSummFINAL[1].pdf

Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Not a Commission, a Committee Authority? Politics? Writing skills? Clarification Year 2007 statement[1].pdf

Are we missing mild hearing loss? British studies (Davis et al., 1997; Lutman et al., 1997) Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment Norton, Gorga, Widen, Folsom, Sininger, Cone-Wesson, Vohr et al., Ear & Hearing, 2000 A Multi-Center Evaluation of How Many Infants with Permanent Hearing Loss Pass a Two-Stage OAE/A-ABR ABR Newborn Hearing Screening Protocol Johnson, White, Widen, Gravel, James, Kennalley, Maxon, Spivak, Sullivan-Mahoney, Vohr, Weirather, & Holstrum, Pediatrics 2005 Massachusetts Loss to Follow-up on Use of Audiologic Evaluation Services (AES): (2002-20032003 Births: 158,243) Liu et al. Pediatrics 2008

Why are we missing mild hearing loss? Targeted hearing loss 35 dbnhl click? < 30-40 db, unusual configurations Standards for calibration, or the lack of them Variability among screening devices, levels, pass-fail criteria

JCIH Stakeholders meeting Hosted by ASHA at its National Office in Rockville, MD September 17, 2008 JCIH members & representatives of companies who manufacture or sell hearing screen devices

JCIH Stakeholder s Meeting Tone: friendly, healthy discussion of issues Speakers: Judy Gravel John Eichwald Panel of JCIH members from the trenches John Durrant Bob Burkard

Gravel Statement of the Challenges: Where We Have Been, Where We Are, Where We d Like to Go Gravel et al. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the OAE/AABR newborn hearing screening protocol: Recommendations for Policy, Practice, and Research American Journal of Audiology 14: S217-228, Dec 2005

Eichwald Discrepancy between prevalence of hearing loss in infants versus school age children RATE / 1000 NEWBORN S SCHOOL AGE INCREASE MILD 21 40 db MODERATE 41 70 db 0.34 9.1 x 26.8 0.53 1.8 x 3.4 Assumed rates

Panel of JCIH Members Stories from the trenches Colorado pass-refer rates and prevalence rates changed with change in equipment UCLA test with the machine that passes everyone

JD Durrant, D Sabo, R Delgado Call for calibration standard for newborn screening using auditory brainstem responses International Journal of Audiology 200746:686-691,.

Bob Burkard Acoustic Calibration of Transients Tutorial on terminology, limitations of SLMs, how do we accurately measure the sound pressure level of a transient? A Description of the ANSI Standards Process

ANSI S3 Standard S3/WG 72, "Procedure for the Generation and Measurement of Acoustic Stimuli used to Elicit Auditory Evoked Potentials". Membership: Robert Burkard (Chair) John Durrant, Rafael Delgado, Judy Widen, Roger Ruth, Dorian Houser, Chick Clemen The proposed scope of the standard is: The proposed standard will identify minimum specifications for the stimuli used to obtain auditory evoked potentials (including otoacoustic emissions), as well as recommended calibration procedures. NOTE: Once the Acoustic Stimuli Standard is completed, we will follow up with a technical standard for Hearing Screening instruments

Discussion at JCIH Stakeholder s Meeting Manufacturers: - What hearing loss do you want to screen for? - You all are asking for things most of our customers don t use JCIH: - Transparency and disclosure link - Way to do at least weekly calibrations - Data/information provided to user beyond pass/refer, i.e. wave forms, noise (for administrative coordinator of use of system)- - Develop quality standards of performance i.e. no false passes in noise, will run 1000 times and not give a false response Brit link

Disclosure and Transparency Descriptive Information How signal was measured What coupler was used and measurement equipment SPL level obtained SPL to HL conversion level Some data that provides Sensitivity/Specificity/Validation information

Task Force on Early Intervention Lead by Christie Yoshinaga-Itano Charge: develop a document providing guidelines for the provision of early intervention services to infants and young children with hearing loss and their families Document to be developed by JCIH members and a task force of professional experts

Document to address System for a single point of entry into intervention Parent/Family involvement Deaf/Hard of Hearing involvement Skills of the Early Intervention providers Fidelity of Intervention

Initial Meeting Hosted by AGBell in December, 2008 Interested JCIH members and Initial Task Force members Outlined document components and additional persons of interest for expert input

Document to address (cont) Progress Monitoring and Transitions Specific Skill Development Language Social/emotional Cognitive Pre-literacy Non-native native English and multicultural populations

Document to address (cont) Children with Additional Disabilities and those who are medically fragile Late Identified Populations with hearing loss with inconclusive evidence for providing early intervention services

Document to address (cont) Interdisciplinary interactions with medical, audiologic, EHDI system, Part C, state EI programs, etc. Systems implementation strategies for statewide systems

Section Outlines Recommendation Description Rationale Supporting Evidence Performance Indicators

Future Activities Continued work with stakeholders as appropriate Draft development of the Early Intervention document Presentations as requested Additional issues as they arise

www.jcih.org

Definition of Targeted Hearing Loss Expanded From congenital bilateral and unilateral sensory or permanent conductive HL To include neural hearing loss (auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony) in infants admitted to the NICU 5 days.

Hearing Screen Protocols Separate protocols are therefore recommended for NICU and well baby nurseries. Infants > 5 days in NICU are to have AABR included as part of their screen so that neural HL will not be missed

Clarification Rationale for different protocols Where did the 5 days in the NICU come from? One of the considerations was the cost of making the change for all NICU babies which represent 10% of all newborns. All others can be screened with either OAE or ABR. JW comment: automated ABR?

Clarification: Follow up for risk factors Previous recommendation for every 6 months - too great a burden on system - infants with unknown risk factors develop delayed- onset HL Thus responsibility for surveillance shifted to PCP with referral to audiologist > Risk factor list Low risk another assessment by 24-30 months New concern assess immediately * risk for delayed onset - earlier & more frequent re- assessment

Clarification Recommendations regarding ototoxic medications To be consistent with the intent of simplifying the referral process to NICU > 5 days, the recommendation has been reworded: All infants with or without risk factors requiring NICU care of >5 days, including any of the following: ECMO,* assisted ventilation, exposure to ototoxic medications (gentamycin and tobramycin) or loop diuretics (furosemide/lasix). In addition, regardless of length of stay: hyperbilirubinemia requiring exchange transfusion.

Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment Multi-center Investigation sponsored by NIH- NIDCD Norton, Gorga, Widen, Folsom, Sininger, Cone- Wesson, Vohr et al., Ear & Hearing, 2000 To determine the accuracy of three measures of peripheral auditory system status (TEOAE, DPOAE and ABR) applied in the perinatal period for predicting behavioral hearing status at 8-12 months corrected age.

Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment 7 institutions 7,179 infants evaluated 2,348 = WBN babies 4,478 = NICU babies 355 = well babies with high risk indicators Targeted for VRA @ 8-12 months : NICU, WBN with HRI, and 80 WBN (no HRI) infants who failed one or more neonatal testing 3,134 (64%) returned for VRA

Identifying Mild PHL in Infants Norton et al. (2000) Three measures (ABR, TEOAE, DPOAE) - able to identify majority of ears with moderate hearing loss or greater. more difficult for any tool to distinguish between normal hearing and mild hearing loss (p.533) some ears with mild hearing loss will be missed, regardless of which test is used (p.534)

Identifying Mild PHL in Infants Cone-Wesson et al. (2000) Ears with mild PHL (n=22 [30.2%] of 86 ears with PHL) confirmed at 8-12 months (VRA) Outcomes (neonatal ABR and OAE [DPOAE and TEOAE]) 10 ears failed both OAE and ABR tests, 4 ears passed both OAE and ABR tests, 4 passed ABR and failed both OAE measures 2 failed ABR and passed OAE tests.

Massachusetts Loss to Follow-up on Use of Audiologic Evaluation Services (AES): (2002-20032003 Births: 158,243) Liu et al. Pediatrics 2008 385 with PHL (64% bilateral; 71% mild or moderate in degree) 76% (N=294) did not pass NHS Median age at dx: 1.2 months 20% (N =77) passed NHS 76% of losses were mild; ~80% bilaterally affected Median age at dx: 7.7 months 4% (N = 14) missed NHS Median age at dx: 8.7 months