Co-exposure of Arsenite and Benzo(a)pyrene: : Effect of glutathione on DNA adduct levels

Similar documents
Chemical Carcinogenesis November

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS IN VIRUS-ASSOCIATED HUMAN CANCERS

Chemical Carcinogenesis November

Arsenic as a Human Health Hazard: Highlights of Recent Epidemiologic Findings

Glutathione Regulation

HOW CAN MECHANISTIC DATA FROM SYSTEMS APPROACHES IMPROVE OF OUR UNDERSTANDING OF CARCINOGENIC RISK FOR MIXTURES?

Arsenic-Induced Enhancement of Ultraviolet Radiation Carcinogenesis in Mouse Skin: A Dose Response Study

Pro-Oxidant Environmental Exposures: Implications of Redox Imbalance in Autism S. Jill James, Ph.D.

Priorities for Occupational Cancer Research and Prevention in Canada Paul A. Demers, PhD

ToxStrategies, Inc. and Summit Toxicology

Hepatocarcinogenesis: chemical models

IV Nutrient Therapy in Radiation Recovery

Genomics and proteomics offers new hopes towards a personalized approach to lung cancer prevention and treatment

Acrolein is an environmental toxicant, mainly found in smoke released from

A Speciation Study focused on the Identification of Proximate Toxic Arsenic Metabolites. Kazuo T. Suzuki

INFLUENCE OF MELATONIN ON ARSENIC MEDIATED PANCREATIC DAMAGE IN SWISS ALBINO MICE

BIOMARKERS AND TOXICITY MECHANISMS 07 Mechanisms Metabolism & Detoxification. Luděk Bláha, PřF MU, RECETOX

Supporting Information

Environmental Management & Pollution Environmental and Chemical Carcinogenesis

Glutathione / Thioredoxin Nrf2 & Hyperoxia

Understanding Cisplatin Resistance Using Cellular Models. Britta Stordal 1 and Mary Davey 2

Selec%ve killing of cancer cells by a small molecule targe%ng the stress response to ROS

RESISTANCE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PLATINUM AND PARP-INHIBITORS IN OVARIAN CANCER.

Mechanism of Action of N-Acetylcysteine in the Protection Against the Hepatotoxicity of Acetaminophen in Rats In Vivo

Arsenic Toxicity and Mitochondrial Metabolism in Astrocytes

MODULE No.26: Drug Metabolism

Role of metabolism in Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Drug Metab Rev. 2007;39(1):

Analysis of 18 Urinary Mercapturic Acids by two Multiplex-LC-MS/MS Methods

Putting Science to Work. Heptox Virtual Liver Platform

Environment and Cancer. Manolis Kogevinas Professor, co-director, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona

INTRODUCTION

and cytochromes P-450 in chicken embryo hepatocytes

A review of human carcinogens -Part F: Chemical agents and related occupations

Benzo[a]Pyrene Update - A Game Changer for Environmental Remediation and Property Revitalization? April 28, Presented by Kristen Rivera

Cytolethality of Glutathione Conjugates with Monomethylarsenic or Dimethylarsenic Compounds

The effective - IN BODY- form of glutathione. White Paper

The Health Effects of Combustion

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) - Summaries & Evaluations

Highlights from ten years of investing in Rooibos research

Mechanism of Detoxification

The Role of GSH in Cervical Cancer Glutathione (GSH)

Mutagenesis. David M. DeMarini, Ph.D. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

R. Balansky 1,2, F. D Agostini 2, A. Izzotti 2, P. Kalpakam 3, V.E. Steele 4, S. De Flora 2

Deficiencies of Aging

Pharmacological Strategies for facilitating the excretion of Homogentisic acid in Alkaptonuria. DominicWilliams

PHASE I Detoxification: The First Line of Defense

Health Effects of Preserved Wood: Relationship Between CCA-Treated Wood and Incidence of Cancer in the United States

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY. Yan Zhong

Types of Electrophilic Carcinogenic Intermediates

Avoidable Occupational and Environmental Causes of Cancer

Variants in DNA Repair Genes and Glioblastoma. Roberta McKean-Cowdin, PhD

The Role of Nrf2 in the Differential Susceptibility of Male and Female Mice to Acetaminophen- Induced Hepatotoxicity

Supplementary Figure 1. MAT IIα is Acetylated at Lysine 81.

The liver in poisoning: what can we learn from animal models?

General Considerations

Glutathione Assay Kit

Lankenau Institute for Medical Research Annual Progress Report: 2011 Formula Grant

Title. Author(s)GOTO, Ikuo; AGAR, Nihal S.; MAEDE, Yoshimitsu. CitationJapanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 40(2-3): 99. Issue Date DOI

October copyright W.Crinnion 2015

Spherical Nucleic Acids For Advanced Wound Healing Applications Chad A. Mirkin

7. Reverse transcription ID nucleophile and electrophile. Substitution reaction.

Cutaneous metabolism progress in the new Century. Simon Wilkinson Medical Toxicology Centre Newcastle University, UK

PAH - Sources and Measurement Mike Woodfield - AEAT

LPS LPS P6 - + Supplementary Fig. 1.

Basic properties and molecular mechanisms of exogenous chemical carcinogens

Association between the CYP1A1 polymorphisms and hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

RESISTANT MECHANISMS OF CISPLATIN IN HUMAN LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA CELL LINE As49DDP

Aim of the subject I. Topics. Aim of the subject II.

A. Generation and characterization of Ras-expressing autophagycompetent

IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans IARC Monograph Evaluations

Supplementary figures and legends for

OPINION of the French Agency for Environmental and Occupational Health Safety

B. Incorrect! Compounds are made more polar, to increase their excretion.

Supplementary Figure 1. Characterization of Vn. (a) UV-Vis spectrum showing a band at ~420 nm corresponding to the band gap of nano-v 2

optimal health for life genotype report Name: Date of Birth: Sample Number: Referring Practitioner: Date Reported:

NSAID celecoxib: a potent mitochondrial pro-oxidant cytotoxic agent sensitizing metastatic cancers and cancer stem cells to chemotherapy

Lankenau Institute for Medical Research Annual Progress Report: 2011 Formula Grant

EM-X Herbal Tea Inhibits Interleukin-8 Release in Alvelor Epithelial cells

Biomarkers of acrylamide

Mechanistic Toxicology

A Control-based Biological Monitoring Guidance value for PAHS and a follow-up study of exposure in UK workplaces.

THE STUDY ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CIGARETTE SMOKING AND THE p53 PROTEIN AND P21 PROTEIN EXPRESSION IN NON-SMALL LUNG CANCER

Module Two: Detoxification Systems

Supplementary information Novel VCP modulators mi2gate major pathologies of rd10, a mouse model of re2ni2s pigmentosa

Air pollution as a major risk factor for cancer

MULTIPLE SOURCES OF PAH EXPOSURE, DNA METHYLATION AND BREAST CANCER. Alexandra J. White

Detoxification and biotransformation of xenobiotics in marine organisms

Supplemental Figures. Amylase. Glucose. Pancreas FAP-WT FAP-KO weight (g) mg/dl U/L 0.

Policy Implications. Virginia M. Weaver, MD, MPH Associate Professor, Environmental Health Sciences and Medicine Johns Hopkins University

Samuel M. Cohen, M.D., Ph.D. Food Safety Case Study: Arsenic. ILSI North America Southampon, Bermuda January 21, 2014

TOXICOLOGY FOR ENGLISH SPEAKING STUDENTS

VaTx1 VaTx2 VaTx3. VaTx min Retention Time (min) Retention Time (min)

Improvement of Intracellular Glutathione Content. in Baker s Yeast. for Nutraceutical Application

Mercury and The Human Detoxification System

High Content Imaging : Meaningful pictures for relevant results in dermocosmetology

2017 Cloudberry Nutritionals, LLC [1705v4.3]

Cysteine Peptide Scientific Review, Dr. S. Dudek, DMV International

Dose-Response Assessment for Arsenic: A Case Study for Why the LNT Doesn t Work

Lung Cancer: Epidemiology, Etiology, and Prevention

Paternal exposure and effects on microrna and mrna expression in developing embryo. Department of Chemical and Radiation Nur Duale

Transcription:

Co-exposure of Arsenite and Benzo(a)pyrene: : Effect of glutathione on DNA adduct levels Glenn Talaska 1 Jay Vietas 1,2 1 Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, 2 United States Air Force

Arsenic and Cancer Medicinal Medicinal Uses and Occupational Exposures Higher Higher dose chronic studies (>100 ug/l) Tseng et al.. (1968) in Taiwan Confirmation in other studies Chile, Chile, China, Bangladesh Lower Lower dose studies (<100 ug/l) have not observed increased cancer risk

Occupational Epidemiology Occupational Exposures Smelters, pesticides, fossil fuel combustion Strong Strong relation between cancer risk and: Length of exposure Amount of exposure Interaction effect of smoking and arsenic

Modeling Arsenic Problems Problems with animal model As not a complete carcinogen Cancer observed at cytotoxic levels Co-CarcinogenesisCarcinogenesis UV BaP

Benzo(a)pyrene Common component of PAH mixtures: coal tar, tobacco smoke Used to model entire family of PAHs Exposure results in formation of stable DNA adducts Measurable with sensitive assay

Effect of Arsenite on BaP Adducts in Hepa-1 1 Cells Fold change in adduct level 100 10 1 1.0 M BaP 0.5 M BaP 0.1 M BaP 17x 0 5 10 µm As Maier et al. (2002) Mutat. Res., 517, 101

Effect of Arsenite on Lung BaP Adducts in C57BL/6 Mice 50 Adducts per 10 9 Nucleotides 19.9 * 12.7 0 As + BaP BaP Evans et al. (2004) Carcinogenesis, 25, 493 * p = 0.038

Effect of Arsenite on Skin BaP Adducts in C57BL/6 Mice 500 450 Adducts per 10 9 Nucleotides 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 364.1 307.1 50 0 As + BaP BaP Evans et al. (2004) Carcinogenesis

Common Link Arsenite Arsenite Metabolism Series of steps involving reduction and methylation Requires glutathione as a cofactor Benzo(a)pyrene Detoxification Glutathione conjugation Common Common biological link: Glutathione

Potential Mechanism for BAP and As Interactions

Glutathione (GSH) Function Major thiol in redox homeostasis 1-1010 mm in all cells Conjugates with electrophiles Synthesis Six Enzymes Glutamate-cysteine ligase (GCL)

Glutathione Modulation GCL GCL Inhibitors Buthionine Sulfoximine (BSO) GCLM (-/-)( Increasing GSH Glutathione ethyl ester (GSH-EE) N-acetyl cysteine

Hypothesis Changes in intracellular glutathione levels are inversely related to arsenite s effect on benzo(a)pyrene DNA adduct levels in vitro and in vivo.

Phase 1: Effect of decreased GSH In vitro Characterize dose-response relationship between arsenite, BSO, and BaP DNA adducts using HEPA-1 1 cells Observe Observe the effect of endogenous reduction of glutathione levels using Gclm(-/-) MEFs

Cell Treatment Protocol 0 hrs 12 24 36 48 Treat with Arsenite and BSO Add BSO Treat with BaP Harvest Cells

500 BaP DNA Adduct Levels in Hepa-1 Cells Treated with Arsenite and BSO % BaP DNA Adducts compared to Baseline (no arsenite or BSO treatment) 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Baseline 0 µm As 0.5 µm As 1 µm As 2 µm As 0 1 5 10 15 Buthionine Sulfoximine (µm) Error bars represent standard error of mean

Effect of Arsenite on BaP DNA Adducts in Gclm(+/+) and Gclm(-/-) Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts 400 BaP DNA Adduct Level per 10 9 Nucleotides 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 um As 0.125 um As 0 Gclm (+/+) Gclm (-/-) Error bars represent standard error of mean

Conclusions Effect of decreased GSH in vitro Arsenite Arsenite potentiates BaP DNA adduct levels As GSH decreases, BaP DNA adduct levels increase Decreased GSH levels appear to increase the cell s s sensitivity to arsenite

Phase 1: Effect of decreased GSH: In vivo C57BL/6 C57BL/6 Mice Treatments Arsenite in DW BSO BaP Wild Wild Type and Glcm (-/-) Arsenite in DW BaP

C57BL/6 2 mg/l Sodium Arsenite 21 days of treatment MilliQ Water BSO Saline BSO Saline 8 daily doses administered 1 hour after topical treatment of BaP

C57BL/6 24 hours after last treatment Treated Skin and Lung Harvested

BaP DNA Adducts per 10 9 Nucleotides 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 BaP DNA Adduct Levels in Lung of C57BL/6 Mice MilliQ Water Arsenite * * 0 Untreated BSO * p = 0.048 Error bars represent standard error of the mean

BaP DNA Adduct Levels in Skin of C57BL/6 Mouse BaP DNA Adducts per 10 9 Nucleotides 600.00 500.00 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 MilliQ Water Arsenite 0.00 * p = 0.028 Untreated BSO * Error bars represent standard error of the mean

C57BL/6 GCLM(-/-) 1 mg/l Sodium Arsenite 21 days of treatment MilliQ Water Topical treatment of BaP 8 daily doses

Comparison of Arsenite's ability to Potentiate BaP DNA adducts in Gclm(-/-) mice versus C57BL/6 in Lung Tissue BaP DNA Adducts per 10 9 Nucleotides 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 MilliQ Water 1 mg/l Arsenite 2 0 C57BL/6 Gclm(-/-) Error bars represent standard error of the mean

BaP DNA Adducts per 10 9 Nucleotides 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 Comparison of Arsenite's ability to Potentiate BaP DNA adducts in Gclm(-/-) mice versus C57BL/6 in Skin Tissue MilliQ Water 1 mg/l Arsenite 50 0 C57BL/6 Gclm(-/-) Error bars represent standard error of mean

Conclusions Effect of decreased GSH in vivo Arsenite Arsenite potentiates BaP-Adduct levels in the lung but not the skin Decreased GSH increases BaP-DNA adducts in the skin and not the lung Gclm(-/-) mice more sensitive to arsenite treatment

Phase 2: Effect of increased GSH: In vitro Characterize dose-response relationship between arsenite, NAC, and BaP DNA adducts using HEPA-1 1 cells

Cell Treatment Protocol 0 hrs 12 24 36 48 Treat with Arsenite and NAC Add NAC Treat with BaP Harvest Cells

Effect of N-acetyl cysteine on BaP DNA adducts in HEPA-1 Cells 300 0 um Arsenite % of DNA Adducts Compared to Baseline (Cells treated with BaP Only) 250 200 150 100 50 Baseline 0.5 um Arsenite 1 um Arsenite 0 0 1 5 N-Acetyl Cysteine (mm) Error bars represent standard error of mean

Conclusions Effect of increased GSH in vitro Augmenting GSH does not reduce BaP-DNA adducts in Hepa-1 1 Cells Is the effective Glutathione transferase activity affected by treatment?

Effect of increased GSH: In vivo C57BL/6 C57BL/6 Mice Treatments Arsenite in DW GSHEE BaP

C57BL/6 2 mg/l Sodium Arsenite 21 days of treatment MilliQ Water GSHEE Saline GSHEE Saline 8 daily doses administered 1 hour after topical treatment of BaP

C57BL/6 24 hours after last treatment Treated Skin and Lung Harvested

BaP DNA Adduct Levels in Lung of C57BL/6 Mouse BaP DNA Adducts per 10 9 Nucleotides 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 MilliQ Water 2 mg/l Arsenite * 0 Untreated GSHEE Error bars represent standard error of the mean

BaP DNA Adduct Levels in Skin of C57BL/6 Mouse 450.00 BaP DNA Adducts per 10 9 Nucleotides 400.00 350.00 300.00 250.00 200.00 150.00 100.00 MilliQ Water 2 mg/l Arsenite 50.00 0.00 Untreated GSHEE Error bars represent standard error of the mean

Conclusions Effect of increased GSH in vivo GSHEE GSHEE treatment does not reduce BaP-DNA adduct levels in skin or lung There are differences in effect on skin and lung

Why differences in skin and lung? Variation Variation in application to skin Skin Skin received highest dose Differences in phase I and II activity levels CYP450 CYP450 CYP450 CYP450 CYP450

Overall Conclusions Arsenite Arsenite potentiates BaP-Adduct levels mostly in lung BaP BaP DNA adduct levels are not inversely related to GSH concentration Do treatments to enhance GSH actually increase the activity of glutathione-s-transferase? transferase? Is this the smoking gun of Arsenic s carcinogenity???

Future Direction Examine Examine Arsenic effect on DNA repair IN Vivo Arsenic Arsenic speciation Will Will longer BAP treatments lead to more pronounced effects?

Acknowledgements Brenda Brenda Schumann Kathy Kathy LaDow Mustafa Mustafa Al-Zoughool Ying Ying Chen Scott Scott Schneider NIOSH NIOSH Pilot Research Project Training Program of the University of Cincinnati ERC Grant #T42/OH008432-01 01

Backup Slides

9 Effect of BSO and Arsenite Treatment on GSH Levels in Hepa-1 1 Cells 8 7 1 mm µ BSO 1 mm µ BSO + 1 um As 5 mm µ BSO 5 mm µ BSO + 1 um As GSH (nmol/mg protein) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Time (hrs) Error bars represent standard error of mean

Effect of BSO Treatments on GSH Levels in Hepa-1 1 Cells GSH (nmol/mg protein) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Untreated 1 mm µ BSO 5 mm µ BSO 10 mm µ BSO 15 mm µ BSO 1 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Time (hrs) Error bars represent standard error of mean

Model of Arsenite Metabolism

Purpose Understand glutathione s s role in arsenic and benzo(a)pyrene co-carcinogenesis carcinogenesis Are glutathione deficient persons more at risk? Do increased levels of glutathione provide protection? Can supplementation/treatment using glutathione be provided?

Effect of NAC Treatments on GSH Levels in Hepa-1 1 Cells 20 18 16 GSH (nmol/mg protein) 14 12 10 8 6 4 Untreated 1 mm NAC 5 mm NAC 2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Time (hrs) Error bars represent standard error of mean

Effect of NAC and Arsenite Treatments on GSH Levels in Hepa-1 1 Cells 30 25 1 mm NAC 5 mm NAC 1 mm NAC + 1 um As 5 mm NAC + 1 um As GSH (nmol/mg protein) 20 15 10 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (hrs) Error bars represent standard error of mean

Study Aims - Study the effect of increased and decreased levels of glutathione on arsenite s impact on benzo(a)pyrene DNA adduct levels in vivo.

Acknowledgements Howard Howard Shertzer, PhD Paul Paul Succop, PhD Joseph Joseph Caruso, PhD Tim Tim Dalton, PhD Alvaro Alvaro Puga, PhD Craig Craig Tomlinson, PhD

Preliminary study of the Effect of Glutathione on BaP Adducts in Hepa-1 1 Cells Adapted from Maier et al (2002)

Research Questions Do reduced GSH levels increase the risk of arsenic cocarcinogenesis? Does Does increased GSH reduce risk of arsenic cocarcinogenesis? Treatment / Supplementation

Dose Response of Arsenite on DNA Adduct levels in the Lung of C57BL/6 Mice 12 BaP DNA Adducts per 10 9 Nucleotides 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 mg/l 2 mg/l 10 mg/l Error bars represent standard error of the mean

Study Total BaP Dose Arsenite Mean Skin Adducts (per 10 9 Nucleotides) Mean Lung Adducts (per 10 9 Nucleotides) Evans et al. (2004) ( 1000 nmol Yes No 364.6 307.1 19.93 12.41 Increase: 54% Vietas C57BL/6 Study 800 nmol Yes No 299.6 272.3 9.20 7.54 Increase: 19%