Supplementary Appendix

Similar documents
Supplementary Appendix

Mipomersen (ISIS ) Page 2 of 1979 Clinical Study Report ISIS CS3

2.0 Synopsis. Choline fenofibrate capsules (ABT-335) M Clinical Study Report R&D/06/772. (For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug:

Antisense Mediated Lowering of Plasma Apolipoprotein C-III by Volanesorsen Improves Dyslipidemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes

(For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug: to Part of Dossier:

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 150 mg Q2W Dose of the PCSK9 mab REGN727/SAR236553: Data from Three Phase 2 Studies

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI.

Effect of pravastatin on LDL particle concentration as determined by NMR spectroscopy: a substudy of a randomized placebo controlled trial

Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

Novel HDL Targeted Therapies: The Search Continues Assoc. Prof. K.Kostner,, Univ. of Qld, Brisbane

ATP IV: Predicting Guideline Updates

Central role of apociii

Hypertriglyceridemia: Why, When, and How to Treat. Gregory Cohn, MD, FNLA, FASPC

Study 2 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Study Top-Line Results. October 29, 2018

A Phase 3 Study of Lomitapide, a Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein (MTP) Inhibitor, in Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia not on Statin Therapy: the ODYSSEY CHOICE II Study

Case Discussions: Treatment Strategies for High Risk Populations. Most Common Reasons for Referral to the Baylor Lipid Clinic

There are many ways to lower triglycerides in humans: Which are the most relevant for pancreatitis and for CV risk?

INDIVIDUAL STUDY TABLE REFERRING TO PART OF THE DOSSIER

Zuhier Awan, MD, PhD, FRCPC

Antihyperlipidemic Drugs

Copyright 2017 by Sea Courses Inc.

Hypertriglyceridemia. Ara Metjian, M.D. Resident s Report 20 December 2002

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

Lipids, Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Risk: Getting the Most out of New and Old Biomarkers. New and Old Biomarkers. Disclosures

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Anne Carol Goldberg, MD, FACP, FAHA, FNLA Washington University, St. Louis, MO USA

Effects of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin on LDL and HDL Particle Concentrations in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome

ClinialTrials.gov Identifier: HOE901_4020 Insulin Glargine Date: Study Code: This was a multicenter study that was conducted at 59 US sites

Approach to Dyslipidemia among diabetic patients

PREDIABETES TESTING SERVICES

Management of Post-transplant hyperlipidemia

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Vildagliptin/Metformin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes

Serum levels of galectin-1, galectin-3, and galectin-9 are associated with large artery atherosclerotic

DYSLIPIDEMIA PHARMACOLOGY. University of Hawai i Hilo Pre- Nursing Program NURS 203 General Pharmacology Danita Narciso Pharm D

Alirocumab Treatment Effect Did Not Differ Between Patients With and Without Low HDL-C or High Triglyceride Levels in Phase 3 trials

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

N-3 Fatty Acids Non-HDL-Cand LDL-C Thomas Dayspring MD, FACP

Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or

Coverage Guidelines. NMR LipoProfile and NMR LipoProfile -II Tests

PCSK9 inhibition across a wide spectrum of patients: One size fits all?

AMR101, a Pure-EPA Omega-3 Fatty Acid, Lowers Triglycerides in Patients with Very High Triglycerides Without Raising LDL- C: The MARINE Study

Ezetimibe and SimvastatiN in Hypercholesterolemia EnhANces AtherosClerosis REgression (ENHANCE)

Alirocumab for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance: SAR236553/REGN727 (alirocumab)

Treatment of Atherosclerosis in 2007

Supplementary Online Content

Relationship of Apolipoprotein B Levels to the Number of Risk Factors for Metabolic Syndrome

Behind LDL: The Metabolism of ApoB, the Essential Apolipoprotein in LDL and VLDL

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Nature Genetics: doi: /ng.3561

Common Repatha Documentation Requirements for Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia and Established CVD 1,2

Antisense Mediated Lowering of Plasma Apolipoprotein C-III by Volanesorsen Improves Dyslipidemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes

Supplementary Appendix

Simvastatin With or Without Ezetimibe in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes 3-Year Outcomes

Evan A. Stein 1, David Sullivan 2, Anders G. Olsson 3, Rob Scott 4, Jae B. Kim 4, Allen Xue 4, Thomas Liu 4, Scott M. Wasserman 4

The Role of Apolipoprotein CIII in Coronary Artery Disease. Disclosures

SYNOPSIS. Abbreviated Clinical Study Report. Study Code: RIMON_L_01031 Document Status: Synopsis V 2.1 Date: 16-Oct Title of the study:

Drug Class Monograph

Inhibition of PCSK9: The Birth of a New Therapy

DYSLIPIDEMIA RECOMMENDATIONS

Comprehensive Treatment for Dyslipidemias. Eric L. Pacini, MD Oregon Cardiology 2012 Cardiovascular Symposium

The Addition of Ezetimibe to Statin therapy in. Patients with Homozygous Familial. Hypercholesterolaemia

What Else Do You Need to Know? Presenter Disclosure Information. Case 1: Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in a 53-Year-Old Man. Learning Objectives

Lipids Board Review. Ira Goldberg, MD New York University School of Medicine. Which of the following is the best initial therapy choice?

PCSK9 for LDL Cholesterol Reduction: What have we learned from clinical trials?

ANCHOR Study Results Overview

Supplementary Online Content

The New Gold Standard for Lipoprotein Analysis. Advanced Testing for Cardiovascular Risk

Considerations and Controversies in the Management of Dyslipidemia for ASCVD Risk Reduction

Study 1 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Long-Term Safety Study Top-Line Results

LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes?

Prospective Natural-History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis

ANTIHYPERLIPIDEMIA. Darmawan,dr.,M.Kes,Sp.PD

SYNOPSIS 2/198 CSR_BDY-EFC5825-EN-E02. Name of company: TABULAR FORMAT (For National Authority Use only)

Hyperlipidemia. Prepared by : Muhannad Mohammed Supervisor professor : Dr. Ahmed Yahya Dallalbashi

Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic and clinical studies

Early Clinical Development #1 REGN727: anti-pcsk9

Katsuyuki Nakajima, PhD. Member of JCCLS International Committee

Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death in

High ( 50%) Restrictions mg 20-40mg PA; TS ⱡ 15 ⱡ

PCSK9 Agents Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

FAMILIAL CHYLOMICRONEMIA SYNDROME (FCS)

Hae Sun Suh, B.Pharm., Ph.D. Jason N. Doctor, Ph.D.

Antisense Inhibition of Apolipoprotein C-III in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia

Update On Diabetic Dyslipidemia: Who Should Be Treated With A Fibrate After ACCORD-LIPID?

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Insulin Glargine (HOE901) Insulin Glulisine (HMR1964)

Best Lipid Treatments

ALN-PCSsc, an RNAi Investigational Agent That Inhibits PCSK9 Synthesis With the Potential for Effective Bi-Annual Dosing: Interim Results

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

The role of mipomersen therapy in the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia

William Campbell Cromwell, MD Curriculum Vitae

IONIS-ANGPTL3-L, an antisense inhibitor to

Walter B. Bayubay CLS (ASCP), AMT, MA Ed, CPI

Supplementary table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants by paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) gene polymorphisms

SITA 100 mg (n = 378)

Transcription:

Supplementary Appendix This appendix has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Supplement to: Gaudet D, Alexander VJ, Baker BF, et al. Antisense inhibition of apolipoprotein C-III in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med 2015;373:438-47. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400283

SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX Antisense Inhibition of APOC3 in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia Gaudet D, et al. Table of Contents Study Investigators. 2 Additional Details on Methods... 3 Figure S1. Flow of study participants... 6 Figure S2. Association between total plasma TG and APOC3 levels for all patients by dose group, and by patients treated with 300 mg ISIS 304801, in the (A, B) monotherapy, (C, D) add-on to fibrate, and (E, F) both cohorts..... 7 Figure S3. Mean percentage change from baseline over time in the ISIS 304801 add-on to fibrate cohort by dose group for (A) APOC3, (B) triglyceride, and (C) HDL-cholesterol..... 8 Figure S4. Individual TG levels at end of treatment in the ISIS 304801 add-on to fibrate cohort by (A) percent change from baseline, and (B) absolute level........ 9 Table S1. Patient disposition (A) Baseline characteristics, (B) Heterozygous loss-of function LPL mutations, and (C) APOE genotypes....... 10 Table S2. Correlations between APOC3 and total TG for the absolute and percent change from baseline values over time......... 12 Table S3. Effect of ISIS 304801 treatment on primary and secondary outcomes..... 13 Table S4. Effect of ISIS 304801 treatment on VLDL-apoB and LDL-apoB levels... 17 Table S5. Effect of ISIS 304801 treatment on (A) Chylo/VLDL, (B) LDL and (C) HDL particles. 18 Table S6. Adverse events in the ISIS 304801 (A) monotherapy and (B) add-on to fibrate cohorts... 19 Table S7. Percentage of injections with local cutaneous reactions in the ISIS 304801 (A) monotherapy and (B) add-on to fibrate cohorts.... 20 References. 21 1 P a g e

Study Investigators (NCT01529424, ISIS 304801-CS2) Daniel Gaudet, MD, PhD, study principle investigator of Université de Montréal and Ecogene- 21Clinical Research Center (Chicoutimi Qc, CAN) Business Associate Principal Investigators of CTMG, Inc., a Site-Specific Research Organization (SSRO): Mark R. Cervi, MD of CTMG, Inc. (Greenville NC) Natalie A. Doyle, MD of CTMG, Inc. (Wilson NC) Gary H. Heck, DO of CTMG, Inc. (Kinston NC) Charles E. Jahrsdorfer, MD of CTMG, Inc. (Greenville NC) Enrique V. Marana, MD of CTMG, Inc. (Farmville NC) Richard Z. Shultzaberger, MD of CTMG, Inc. (Greenville NC) 2 P a g e

Additional Details on Methods STUDY DRUG ISIS 304801 (5 -AGCTTCTTGTCCAGCTTTAT-3 ) is a second-generation antisense inhibitor of APOC3 synthesis that incorporates several chemical modifications to improve potency, duration of action, and tolerability. All of the internucleotide phosphates are chemically modified with a phosphorothioate substitution, in which one of the non-bridging oxygen atoms is substituted with sulfur. Additionally the drug incorporates five 2 -O-(2-methoxyethyl) (2 -MOE) modified ribonucleosides (underlined) at the 3 and 5 ends while retaining ten 2 -O-deoxyribonucleosides within the central portion of the molecule. ISIS 304801 was supplied by Isis Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Carlsbad, CA, USA) in 2-mL stoppered glass vials as a 1-mL solution (200 mg/ml) for single use only. Patients, investigator(s), and study staff were blinded to the treatment assignment, except for the pharmacist who prepared the drug. Placebo was 0.9% sterile saline. ISIS 304801, or placebo, was administered as a single subcutaneous injection once a week for 13 weeks at the specified dose. STUDY PARTICIPANTS Study participants were 18 years old, had a body mass index (BMI) 40 kg/m 2, and had no current diagnosis or history of endocrine, hematologic, renal, hepatic, metabolic, psychiatric, neurologic, pulmonary, or cardiovascular disease, including any condition that pre-disposed to secondary hyperlipidemia, such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or hypothyroidism, nor were they taking drugs that increase TG levels. After a 6 to 8-week diet run-in period, eligible patients not on a TG-lowering therapy had fasting TG 350 mg/dl (4.0 mmol/l) and 2000 mg/dl (22.6 mmol/l), and those on a stable dose of fibrate had fasting TG 225 mg/dl (2.5 mmol/l) and 2000 mg/dl (22.6 mmol/l). STUDY DESIGN A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study design was used to evaluate the effects of ISIS 304801 in patients with severe or uncontrolled hypertriglyceridemia. Eligible patients not on fibrate therapy were assigned to the ISIS 304801 monotherapy cohort, and those on a stable dose of fibrate were assigned to the add-on to fibrate cohort. ISIS 304801 monotherapy patients were randomized equally (1:1:1) to receive doses of 100, 200, and or 300 mg in a 3:1 active to placebo ratio. Eligible patients on a fibrate were randomized equally (1:1) to receive 200 or 300 mg ISIS 304801, and in a 2:1 active-to-placebo ratio. Patients received 13 doses of study 3 P a g e

drug by SC injection once a week for 13 weeks, and then were followed in post-treatment evaluation for 13 weeks. All enrolled patients received diet/alcohol counseling and monitoring for the duration of study participation. Patients were allowed to continue ongoing stable doses of statin therapy and/or oral antidiabetic medication. Alcohol consumption was not allowed for 48 hours prior to visits where lipids were measured. In addition, patients were provided a standardized pre-cooked meal for the dinner (after which they remained fasted for at least 10 hours) prior to these visits. Samples were collected before dosing during the treatment period. OUTCOMES The primary outcome was the percent change in fasting total APOC3 levels from baseline to the end of treatment (average of Day 85 and Day 92). Secondary outcomes included percent change in fasting TG, total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (density gradient <1.006 g/ml), non-hdl cholesterol, total apolipoprotein B (apob), apolipoprotein B-48 (apob-48) and VLDL- APOC3 (density gradient <1.006 g/ml), from baseline to the end of treatment, as well as over time for APOC3 and these other listed parameters. Safety was assessed by determining the incidence, severity, and dose relationship of adverse events (AEs) and changes in laboratory parameters. Safety laboratory evaluations included routine hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis, and coagulation parameters. Other assessments included a physical examination, a 12 lead electrocardiogram, and vital signs. LIPID MEASUREMENTS Fasted blood samples were collected for measurement of lipid parameters at baseline, on Day 8 and then weekly to every other week during the treatment period (immediately prior to administration of ISIS 304801), and on Days 92, 99, 127 and 176 during the post-treatment follow-up period. Total plasma APOC3, chylomicron/vldl APOC3 (density gradient <1.006 g/ml), TGs, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol (precipitated), non-hdl cholesterol (calculated), LDL cholesterol (isolated by ultracentrifugation), chylomicron/vldl cholesterol (density gradient <1.006 g/ml), and apob-48 levels were determined at MedPace Reference Labs (Cincinnati, OH). Triglycerides and cholesterol were measured by standard enzyme-based colorimetric assays. APOC3, total apob and apob-48 were measured by rate nephelometry. Non-HDL cholesterol was calculated. VLDL and LDL 4 P a g e

fractions were isolated from samples by ultracentrifugation, and then assayed for apolipoprotein B content (VLDL-apoB and LDL-apoB) at Ecogene-21 (Chicoutimi, QC Canada). GENOTYPING LPL and APOE genotyping were performed at Ecogene-21 (Chicoutimi, QC Canada). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Primary and secondary pharmacodynamic outcomes were analyzed per protocol. These analyses included all patients who received at least 9 doses of study drug and had no significant protocol deviations that would be expected to affect the outcome measures. Analyses evaluating safety of the intervention included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The primary analysis compared the percent change in fasting total APOC3 levels from baseline to the end of treatment (primary outcome) in the 300 mg dose group of the monotherapy cohort, compared to that of the placebo group. Secondary analyses included comparisons of the primary outcome for other dose groups to the placebo group of each cohort. Similar analyses were done for the secondary outcomes. These latter analyses were exploratory in nature and performed without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Least squares means were estimated from a mixed-effect model repeated-measures analysis of a modified intent-to-treat population, which included all dosed patients with at least one post-baseline APOC3 measurement. P-values were determined from the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test or t-test depending on normality of the data. Normality was determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. All statistical tests were unpaired and two-sided, with a significance level of 0.05 for the primary analysis. Post-hoc correlation coefficients (r) were derived from Pearson product-moment correlations. Software utilized for the analyses was SAS version 9.2 or higher (SAS Institute). Sample size was based on a standard deviation of the percent change in total APOC3 of approximately 46% as estimated from prior clinical experience. Under these assumptions, there was estimated to be at least 80% power to detect a 45% difference in total APOC3 between ISIS 304801 and placebo group at an alpha level of 0.05, assuming 50% reduction in patients receiving ISIS 304801 and 5% in the placebo group. 5 P a g e

Figure S1. Flow of Study Participants Abbreviations: w/c, withdrew consent; AE, adverse event; PD, pharmacodynamics. Analysis of PD outcomes was performed on the per-protocol population as defined in the methods section. * Patients assigned to ISIS 304801 monotherapy were randomized equally (1:1:1) to receive doses of 100, 200 or 300 mg, and then 3:1 active to placebo. Patients assigned to ISIS 304801 add-on to fibrate were randomized equally (1:1) to receive doses of 200 or 300 mg, and then 2:1 active-to-placebo. Principle reason for dose discontinuation: injection site reaction (moderate); abdominal distension (severe); mononucleosis (moderate); musculoskeletal pain (mild); ** serum sickness-like reaction (moderate); fatigue (mild). 6 P a g e

Figure S2. Association between total plasma TG and APOC3 levels for all patients by dose group, and by patients treated with 300 mg ISIS 304801, in the (A, B) monotherapy, (C, D) add-on to fibrate, and (E, F) both cohorts. 7 P a g e

Figure S3. Mean percentage change from baseline over time in the ISIS 304801 add-on to fibrate cohort by dose group for (A) APOC3, (B) triglyceride, and (C) HDL-cholesterol. Solid blue triangles indicate dosing days. 8 P a g e

Figure S4. Individual TG levels at end of treatment in the ISIS 304801 add-on to fibrate cohort by (A) percent change from baseline, and (B) absolute level. 9 P a g e

Table S1. Patient Disposition. (A) Baseline characteristics, (B) Heterozygous loss-of-function LPL mutations, and (C) APOE genotypes A ISIS 304801 Monotherapy ISIS 304801 Add-on to Fibrate * Placebo 100 mg 200 mg 300 mg Placebo 200 mg 300 mg Characteristic (N=16) (N=13) (N=15) (N=13) (N=8) (N=8) (N=12) Gender, F:M 3:13 5:8 1:14 5:8 4:4 2:6 5:7 Age, years 48.6 ±11.9 52.2 ±9.7 49.7 ±12.8 52.8 ±10.4 58.9 ±16.6 58.3 ±6.7 54.0 ±13.8 BMI, kg/m 2 31.1 ±3.0 29.4 ±4.1 30.8 ±3.0 30.9 ±3.6 33.5 ±5.2 29.6 ±3.5 32.5 ±4.6 Statins, n (%) 4 (25.0) 6 (46.2) 4 (26.7) 5 (38.5) 4 (50.0) 4 (50.0) 4 (33.3) Maximal Statin 2 (12.5) 2 (15.4) 2 (13.3) 2 (15.4) 1 (12.5) 4 (50.0) 0 (0.0) Triglycerides, mg/dl 522.7 ±369.7 573.2 ±248.5 662.0 ±299.0 565.6 ±213.7 457.0 ±213.5 281.8 ±74.5 383.7 ±207.4 Median (IQR) 459 (356, 582) 558 (351, 649) 588 (464, 858) 566 (422, 702) 475 (253, 602) 272 (230, 295) 302 (246, 451) HDL-C, mg/dl 33.0 ±7.5 31.5 ±4.7 31.9 ±4.0 33.2 ±8.9 34.9 ±8.4 36.9 ±9.8 35.1 ±11.5 LDL-C, mg/dl 105.1 ±56.3 95.6 ±33.3 79.5 ±25.1 70.9 ±31.0 94.5 ±68.1 118.8 ±37.5 94.5 ±27.7 Results presented are based on analysis of the Safety population. Values are the mean ± standard deviation, except where indicated. IQR denotes interquartile range, Q1 and Q3. * 25 of 28 (89%) patients were on stable doses of fenofibrate (median daily dose = 145 mg); 3 of 28 (11%) patients were on stable doses of gemfibrozol (median daily dose = 1200 mg). Maximal statin (total daily dose): 40 mg and above of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin, or simvastatin. 10 P a g e

Table S1 (cont). B ISIS 304801 Monotherapy ISIS 304801 Add-on to Fibrate LPL Placebo 100 mg 200 mg 300 mg Placebo 200 mg 300 mg Mutation, n (%) (N=16) (N=13) (N=15)* (N=13) (N=8) (N=8) (N=12) Heterozygous mutation 4 (25.0) 5 (38.5) 1 (6.7) 4 (30.8) 2 (25.0) 2 (25.0) 2 (16.7) P207L 2 (12.5) 4 (30.8) 1 (6.7) 2 (15.4) 1 (12.5) 1 (12.5) 2 (16.7) D9N 3 (18.8) 1 (7.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (7.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (12.5) 1 (8.3) G188E 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) N291S 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (7.7) 1 (12.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) Results are based on analysis of the Safety population. *Data not available for 2 patients; Data not available for 3 patients. C ISIS 304801 Monotherapy ISIS 304801 Add-on to Fibrate APOE Placebo 100 mg 200 mg 300 mg Placebo 200 mg 300 mg Genotype, n (%) (N=16) (N=13) (N=15)* (N=13) (N=8) (N=8) (N=12) E2/2 1 (6.3) 1 (7.7) 0 (0.0) 2 (15.4) 3 (37.5) 1 (12.5) 1 (8.3) E2/3 3 (18.8) 2 (15.4) 2 (13.3) 1 (7.7) 2 (25.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (16.7) E2/4 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (13.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) E3/3 6 (37.5) 3 (23.1) 4 (26.7) 1 (7.7) 1 (12.5) 4 (50.0) 3 (25.0) E3/4 6 (37.5) 7 (53.8) 5 (33.3) 6 (46.2) 1 (12.5) 3 (37.5) 2 (16.7) E4/4 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 3 (23.1) 1 (12.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (8.3) Results are based on analysis of the Safety population. *Data not available for 2 patients; Data not available for 3 patients. 11 P a g e

Table S2. Correlations between APOC3 and total TG for the absolute and percent change from baseline values over time. Monotherapy Add-on to Fibrate Both Cohorts APOC3 vs TG All Patients 300 mg ISIS 304801 All Patients 300 mg ISIS 304801 All Patients 300 mg ISIS 304801 Absolute 0.822 0.879 0.876 0.845 0.835 0.862 % Change 0.864 0.888 0.922 0.909 0.866 0.899 12 P a g e

Table S3. Effect of ISIS 304801 treatment on primary and secondary outcomes ISIS 304801 Monotherapy ISIS 304801 Add-on to Fibrate Placebo 100 mg 200 mg 300 mg Placebo 200 mg 300 mg Parameter (N=16) (N=11) (N=13) (N=11) (N=8) (N=8) (N=10) APOC3, mg/dl Baseline 22.2 ±7.7 22.4 ±7.7 23.1 ±5.3 22.6 ±6.3 19.0 ±5.5 15.5 ±3.6 18.3 ±5.9 Endpoint 21.9 ±10.6 12.0 ±5.2 7.6 ±4.1 4.4 ±2.0 17.7 ±3.8 6.1 ±2.9 5.1 ±2.1 % Change 4.2 ±41.7-40.0 ±32.0* -63.8 ±22.3-79.6 ±9.3-2.2 ±25.2-60.2 ±12.5-70.9 ±13.0 LS Mean ±SE 4.2 ±7.5-39.2 ±9.0-64.2 ±8.3-79.9 ±8.9-2.2 ±6.1-60.5 ±6.1-71.7 ±5.3 Triglycerides, mg/dl Baseline 522.7 ±369.7 590.6 ±260.3 641.5 ±291.7 559.1 ±224.6 457.0 ±213.5 281.8 ±74.5 393.7 ±227.8 Median (IQR) 459 (356, 582) 558 (351, 825) 588 (464, 717) 566 (355, 702) 475 (253, 602) 272 (230, 295) 271 (241, 459) Endpoint 547.1 ±355.4 311.6 ±142.6 234.7 ±163.0 139.5 ±36.4 371.7 ±125.0 141.1 ±69.8 134.0 ±60.9 Median (IQR) 456 (343, 640) 277 (226, 394) 180 (157, 262) 120 (115, 185) 338 (290, 394) 120 (103, 172) 116 (91, 191) % Change 20.1 ±72.0-31.3 ±56.8* -57.7 ±28.3-70.9 ±14.1-7.7 ±33.8-51.0 ±13.5-64.0 ±8.9 Median (IQR) 12.1 (-24.6, 28.9) -37.8 (-71.5, -7.0) -70.3 (-79.5, -43.4) -72.2 (-82.8, -67.0) -10.4 (-29.8, 9.7) -43.8 (-63.5, -39.8) -65.4 (-70.7, -54.6) LS Mean ±SE 20.1 ±12.6-31.2 ±15.1* -58.6 ±13.9-70.9 ±15.0-7.7 ±7.3-52.3 ±7.4-64.9 ±6.4 13 P a g e

ISIS 304801 Monotherapy ISIS 304801 Add-on to Fibrate Placebo 100 mg 200 mg 300 mg Placebo 200 mg 300 mg Parameter (N=16) (N=11) (N=13) (N=11) (N=8) (N=8) (N=10) Total Cholesterol, mg/dl Baseline 241.1 ±81.2 235.0 ±50.3 240.5 ±62.7 208.9 ±58.7 228.1 ±61.4 207.6 ±45.9 218.9 ±38.8 Endpoint 231.8 ±33.3 224.3 ±51.8 223.2 ±34.7 192.4 ±47.3 202.1 ±59.2 188.3 ±28.6 199.6 ±54.7 % Change 4.1 ±32.5-4.0 ±13.7-1.2 ±15.3-2.1 ±32.2-11.1 ±12.3-4.0 ±16.1-7.7 ±23.2 LS Mean ±SE 4.1 ±6.5-2.8 ±7.7-6.1 ±7.1-2.4 ±7.7-11.1 ±6.6-6.8 ±6.6-9.0 ±5.7 HDL-C, mg/dl Baseline 33.0 ±7.5 31.1 ±4.2 32.3 ±4.1 33.6 ±9.6 34.9 ±8.4 36.9 ±9.8 33.9 ±12.3 Endpoint 33.2 ±8.8 38.5 ±8.9 42.9 v8.3 48.3 ±15.1 36.3 ±8.6 52.4 ±19.3 51.3 ±19.9 % Change 0.7 ±14.6 26.6 ±38.0 36.2 ±26.0 45.7 ±24.0 5.9 ±22.2 50.6 ±32.0* 51.80 ±23.7 LS Mean ±SE 0.7 ±6.3 28.1 ±7.3 32.6 ±6.8 46.0 ±7.3 5.9 ±9.3 47.5 ±9.5 49.4 ±8.2 Non-HDL-C, mg/dl Baseline 208.1 ±81.7 203.9 ±53.0 208.2±60.8 175.3 ±60.6 193.3 ±65.6 170.8 ±39.8 185.0 ±44.4 Endpoint 198.6 ±32.2 185.8 ±49.3 180.3 ±33.6 144.1 ±56.3 165.8 ±59.7 135.9 ±23.6 148.3 ±64.2 % Change 6.2 ±40.0-7.2 ±18.8-6.8 ±17.0-11.3 ±38.3-13.1 ±15.2-15.2 ±21.0-18.9 ±28.8 LS Mean ±SE 6.2 ±7.8-6.3 ±9.3-11.8 ±8.6-11.7 ±9.3-13.1 ±8.1-18.1 ±8.2-20.3 ±7.1 14 P a g e

ISIS 304801 Monotherapy ISIS 304801 Add-on to Fibrate Placebo 100 mg 200 mg 300 mg Placebo 200 mg 300 mg Parameter (N=16) (N=11) (N=13) (N=11) (N=8) (N=8) (N=10) LDL-C, mg/dl Baseline 105.1 ±56.3 93.0 ±32.6 80.8 ±25.1 64.6 ±27.7 94.5 ±68.1 118.8 ±37.5 98.0 ±26.2 Endpoint 102.1 ±43.4 132.1 ±46.5 134.3 ±35.6 116.5 ±53.6 88.2 ±50.9 112.6 ±26.2 120.3 ±62.1 % Change 10.8 ±41.1 48.3 ±39.0* 79.4 ±53.3 118.3 ±177.3* 5.3 ±35.3 3.54 ±26.4 21.0 ±49.7 LS Mean ±SE 10.8 ±23.0 46.9 ±25.8 72.1 ±23.7 110.6 ±25.6 5.3 ±14.2-2.4 ±14.3 18.5 ±12.4 VLDL-C, mg/dl Baseline 110.2 ±80.8 110.9 ±45.9 127.4 ±58.3 110.6 ±54.8 98.8 ±49.4 52.0 ±6.8 87.0 ±48.2 Endpoint 96.5 ±43.7 53.7 ±24.6 45.9 ±24.0 27.6 ±7.7 77.6 ±29.6 23.4 ±11.1 28.0 ±15.3 % Change 6.3 ±62.5-40.0 ±41.8* -56.1 ±27.2-69.2 ±19.1-6.5 ±48.8-54.30 ±22.5* -63.2 ±21.6* LS Mean ±SE 6.3 ±11.0-39.5 ±12.7-57.5 ±11.7-70.0 ±12.7-6.5 ±11.4-54.8 ±11.6-63.9 ±10.1 VLDL-APOC3, mg/dl Baseline 11.6 ±4.9 10.9 ±5.6 13.3 ±5.6 13.9 ±5.8 9.5 ±3.4 7.5 ±2.2 8.4 ±2.6 Endpoint 12.1 ±6.2 6.0 ±3.3 3.8 ±3.2 1.5 ±0.9 9.5 ±2.6 2.7 ±1.7 1.9 ±1.0 % Change 21.0 ±60.0-27.3 ±65.6* -66.7 ±26.3-87.6 ±8.6 8.4 ±38.0-66.4 ±15.3-77.2 ±11.4 LS Mean ±SE 21.0 ±12.1-29.3 ±13.8-68.1 ±13.0-85.3 ±13.7 8.4 ±8.2-66.9 ±8.3-77.9 ±7.2 15 P a g e

ISIS 304801 Monotherapy ISIS 304801 Add-on to Fibrate Placebo 100 mg 200 mg 300 mg Placebo 200 mg 300 mg Parameter (N=16) (N=11) (N=13) (N=11) (N=8) (N=8) (N=10) Total ApoB, mg/dl Baseline 117.8 ±38.8 116.3 ±26.1 114.1 ±27.5 100.0 ±20.3 105.3 ±48.3 112.6 ±25.8 106.8 ±27.0 Endpoint 115.2 ±23.1 116.7 ±32.4 120.5 ±21.0 101.7 ±41.9 95.1 ±44.0 95.8 ±13.4 100.2 ±45.8 % Change 3.9 ±26.0 0.5 ±14.9 10.2 ±18.1 1.3 ±36.2-8.4 ±11.9-9.5 ±22.0-8.8 ±27.7 LS Mean ±SE 3.9 ±6.3 3.6 ±7.4 7.1 ±6.9 1.5 ±7.4-8.4 ±7.9-12.7 ±7.9-10.4 ±6.9 ApoB-48, mg/dl Baseline 0.7 ±0.3 0.9 ±0.6 0.8 ±0.5 0.9 ±0.5 0.9 ±0.8 0.5 ±0.3 0.5 ±0.2 Endpoint 1.0 ±0.7 0.6 ±0.3 0.4 ±0.3 0.3 ±0.2 0.6 ±0.4 0.3 ±0.1 0.3 ±0.2 % Change 64.5 ±148.6-20.1 ±45.5* -38.6 ±50.7-61.1 ±25.5-15.1 ±33.4-34.4 ±25.7-33.8 ±20.1 Results presented are based on the Per-Protocol population, except for the LS mean percent change from baseline results. Values are the means ± standard deviations in mg/dl, except where indicated. Baseline is defined as the Day -8 value. Endpoint represents the average of the Day 85 and Day 92 values. Percent (%) change represents from Baseline to Endpoint. IQR denotes interquartile range, Q1 and Q3; LS, least squares; SE, standard error. To convert apolipoprotein values (APOC3, VLDL-APOC3, ApoB, and ApoB-48) to g/l multiply by 0.01; to convert triglyceride (TG) values to mmol/l multiply by 0.0113; to convert cholesterol (C) values to mmol/l, multiply by 0.0259. P-value * <0.05; <0.01; <0.001 16 P a g e

Table S4. Effect of ISIS 304801 treatment on VLDL-apoB and LDL-apoB Levels ISIS 304801 Monotherapy ISIS 304801 Add-on to Fibrate ApoB, mg/dl Placebo 100 mg 200 mg 300 mg Placebo 200 mg 300 mg Mean ±SD (N=16) (N=11) (N=13) (N=11) (N=8) (N =8) (N =10) VLDL-apoB Baseline 20.1 ±7.3 19.6 ±12.7 25.4 ±10.9 20.8 ±3.3 18.1 ±6.9 12.7 ±3.9 15.0 ±11.8 Endpoint 16.5 ±5.8 14.7 ±6.9 15.3 ±18.6 8.0 ±3.8 13.6 ±5.6 6.1 ±3.3 6.5 ±4.0 % Change -7.6 ±44.9-7.5 ±61.6-32.2 ±62.7-62.7 ±17.8-23.4 ±16.2-44.1 ±39.7-64.4 ±370.2* Median (IQR) -14.2 (-44.3, 21.4) -23.5 (-51.7, 13.8) -44.7 (-82.4, 3.1) -69.6 (-77.3, -50.0) -20.5 (-31.1, -14.8) -50.0 (-75.0, -30.0) -42.9 (-80.6, -42.9) LDL-apoB Baseline 95.8 ±43.1 93.0 ±26.6 95.8 ±33.0 73.1 ±24.8 80.5 ±53.0 92.4 ±23.2 82.3 ±23.2 Endpoint 95.6 ±36.7 112.0 ±37.4 121.9 ±31.2 112.2 ±56.1 73.8 ±34.5 91.6 ±18.6 95.0 ±44.0 % Change 8.5 ±38.5 21.0 ±24.9 38.0 ±31.7 46.4 ±48.4 1.7 ±21.6 4.0 ±23.1 12.0 ±32.0 Median (IQR) 4.9 (-13.4, 16.2) 15.7 (8.9, 31.9) 28.9 (15.3, 53.8) 41.8 (-2.7, 81.5) 6.1 (-21.4, 17.6) 2.7 (-15.3, 16.8) -1.7 (-4.5, 30.6) Results presented are based on analysis of the Per-Protocol population. Values are the means ± standard deviations in mg/dl, except for % change which shows both the mean ±standard deviation and median (interquartile range) results. Baseline is defined as the average of Day -8 and Day -1, or Day 1, pre-dose results. Endpoint represents the average of the Day 85 and Day 92 values. To convert apolipoprotein values to g/l multiply by 0.01. P-values were determined for percent change from baseline at end point, vs placebo (* <0.05; <0.01; <0.001). 17 P a g e

Table S5. Effect of ISIS 304801 treatment on lipoprotein particle size: Chylomicron/VLDL, LDL and HDL particles ISIS 304801 Monotherapy ISIS 304801 Add-on to Fibrate Size, nm Placebo 100 mg 200 mg 300 mg Placebo 200 mg 300 mg Median (Q1,Q3) (N=16) (N=11) (N=13) (N=11) (N=8) (N=8) (N=10) Chylo/VLDL-P Baseline 63.4 (58.1, 71.1) 58.1 (51.2, 68.4) 66.8 (62.1, 71.1) 64.2 (61.5, 70.3) 56.9 (54.7, 58.8) 58.2 (52.8, 62.1) 57.7 (49.5, 62.9) Day 92 60.9 (56.2, 70.9) 56.0 (48.2, 61.6) 56.7 (49.5, 60.6) 53.8 (48.6, 57.1) 53.8 (50.0, 58.0) 49.7 (45.3, 59.4) 51.5 (48.1, 55.9) Change 1.0 (-3.5, 3.1) -4.0 (-9.1, 2.6) -12.9 (-15.3, -4.2) -11.2 (-18.5, -6.3) -3.6 (-5.3, -0.1) -7.1 (-8.7, 0.0) -4.2 (-14.1, -1.2) LDL-P Baseline 19.6 (19.6, 19.7) 19.6 (19.4, 19.6) 19.5 (19.5, 19.6) 19.6 (19.6, 19.6) 19.7 (19.6, 19.8) 19.7 (19.7, 20.0) 19.7 (19.6, 19.8) Day 92 19.6 (19.5, 19.6) 19.6 (19.6, 20.0) 20.3 (19.8, 20.6) 20.1 (19.7, 20.5) 19.7 (19.6, 20.1) 20.6 (20.3, 20.6) 20.3 (19.8, 21.1) Change -0.1 (-0.1, 0.0) 0.2 (0.0, 0.3) 0.7 (0.2, 1.1) 0.4 (0.1, 0.8) 0.0 (-0.1, 0.5) 0.6* (0.5, 0.9) 0.7* (0.3, 1.3) HDL-P Baseline 8.9 (8.6, 9.2) 8.9 (8.7, 9.1) 8.8 (8.8, 9.1) 8.8 (8.5, 9.1) 8.7 (8.4, 8.8) 8.6 (8.5, 8.7) 8.8 (8.6, 9.0) Day 92 8.8 (8.7, 9.2) 8.8 (8.7, 9.2) 8.5 (8.5, 8.9) 8.7 (8.6, 8.8) 8.7 (8.5, 8.8) 8.5 (8.3, 8.8) 9.1 (8.6, 9.2) Change 0.0 (-0.1, 0.2) 0.1 (-0.4, 0.2) -0.3 (-0.5, -0.1) -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4) 0.0 (0.0, 0.2) 0.0 (-0.1, 0.2) 0.3 (-0.4, 0.4) Particle parameters were derived by NMR spectroscopy analysis (LipoScience Inc., Raleigh NC). 1 Values shown are the median (interquartile range). Change is from baseline to Day 92. Chylo/VLDL-P denotes chylomicron/very-low-density lipoprotein particle; LDL-P, low-density lipoprotein particle; HDL-P, high-density lipoprotein particle. P-values * <0.05; <0.01; <0.001 (vs placebo). 18 P a g e

Table S6. Adverse events in the ISIS 304801 (A) monotherapy and (B) add-on to fibrate cohorts* A 100 mg 200 mg 300 mg Total Placebo ISIS 304801 ISIS 304801 ISIS 304801 ISIS 304801 Preferred Term, n (%) (N=16) (N=13) (N=15) (N=13) (N=41) Fatigue 1 (6.3) 2 (15.4) 2 (13.3) 2 (15.4) 6 (14.6) Musculoskeletal pain 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (13.3) 2 (15.4) 4 (9.8) Nausea 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 4 (30.8) 4 (9.8) Chills 0 (0.0) 1 (7.7) 1 (6.7) 1 (7.7) 3 (7.3) Myalgia 0 (0.0) 1 (7.7) 1 (6.7) 1 (7.7) 3 (7.3) B 200 mg 300 mg Total Placebo ISIS 304801 ISIS 304801 ISIS 304801 Preferred Term, n (%) (N=8) (N=8) (N=12) (N=20) Diarrhoea 1 (12.5) 2 (25.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (10.0) Abdominal pain upper 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (16.7) 2 (10.0) Fatigue 0 (0.0) 1 (12.5) 1 (8.3) 2 (10.0) Feeling of Relaxation 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (16.7) 2 (10.0) * Adverse events related or possibly related to study drug; events at the injections site are excluded (see Table S7). 19 P a g e

Table S7. Percentage of injections with local cutaneous reactions in the ISIS 304801 (A) monotherapy and (B) add-on to fibrate cohorts* A 100 mg 200 mg 300 mg Total Placebo ISIS 304801 ISIS 304801 ISIS 304801 ISIS 304801 % Injections (N=16) (N=13) (N=15) (N=13) (N=41) Mean (SD) 0.0 (0.0) 11.5 (28.0) 5.4 (7.4) 24.7 (30.5) 13.4 (24.5) Median (Q1, Q3) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.0 (0.0, 7.7) 0.0 (0.0, 12.5) 15.4 (0.0, 38.5) 0.0 (0.0, 15.4) B 200 mg 300 mg Total Placebo ISIS 304801 ISIS 304801 ISIS 304801 % Injections (N=8) (N=8) (N=12) (N=20) Mean (SD) 0.0 (0.0) 19.2 (31.3) 11.7 (16.4) 14.7 (23.0) Median (Q1, Q3) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 3.8 (0.0, 34.6) 3.8 (0.0, 19.2) 3.8 (0.0, 19.2) * Local cutaneous reactions are adverse events at the injection site defined as erythema, swelling, pruritus, pain and/or tenderness, which started on the day of injection and persisted for two days or more. 20 P a g e

References 1. Jeyarajah EJ, Cromwell WC, Otvos JD. Lipoprotein particle analysis by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Clin Lab Med. 2006;26:847-70. 21 P a g e