Workplace Noise Surveys: A Hands-On Measurement Workshop

Similar documents
Workplace Noise Surveys: A Hands-On Measurement Workshop

3M Center for Hearing Conservation

Hearing Conservation Program Regulations and Recommendations Summary

noise induced Working Together to Prevent Hearing Loss

Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing

Hearing Loss Prevention PM Session Ted Madison

Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual

UCSD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S) and Center for Occupational & Environmental Medicine (COEM) 2017

Villanova University Department of Environmental Health and Safety Policy and Procedure Manual

UC Merced Hearing Conservation Program


This program is designed to prevent hearing loss for students, staff and employees while engaged in universitysponsored

Before taking field measurements, it is important to determine the type of information required. The person making the measurement must understand:

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

NOISE CONTROL AND HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program Administration

East Carolina University

HEARING CONSERVATION PROCEDURE

North Dakota State University Noise/Hearing Conservation

Hearing Conservation Program

SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY S WRITTEN HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM December 2017

Hearing Conservation Terminology Courtesy of Workplace Integra, Inc.

Procedure. Procedure

Hearing Conservation Program April 27, 2018

Hearing Conservation Program

BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE OCCUPATIONAL NOISE

Craven Community College HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Health, Safety, Security and Environment

NOISE & HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM YALE UNIVERSITY

Establishing an Effective Hearing Conservation Program. Sarah E. Mouser, AuD, CCC-A Doctor of Audiology & Customer Relations Facilitator

Hearing Conservation Program

HEARING CONSERVATION PURPOSE

Town of Brunswick. Hearing Conservation Plan

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

The University of Texas at El Paso

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Contents. 1) Purpose ) Policy ) Definitions ) Procedure a) Requirements b) Noise standard... 4

Hearing Conservation Program

Occupational Noise & Hearing Loss Presented at CopperPoint SafetyWorks 2016 By Ms. Robyn Steiner, MSPH CIH CSP June 8 and 15, 2016

Earplug Attenuation Validation As Part of a Hearing Conservation Program. David Friedman, CIH,MSPH, ARM Luminant

Effective Date: 27-February Table of Contents

Simultaneous Measurement of At Ear and Shoulder Noise Exposures

Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing

Occupational Noise Exposure

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

Current Issues in Hearing Loss Prevention

Hearing ConservationTraining

Page104. Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

CCS Administrative Procedure H Hearing Conservation

Emerging Best Practices. Christine B. Petitti Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management OSHA

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program. Southwestern Community College. Office of Human Resources

100% Preventable. HEARING. Hearing and Noise Reduction Overview

Vision Painting Inc. Safety Management System

11. Hearing Conservation Program Chapter , WAC

Hearing Conservation Program. Guideline for Noise Exposure

HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES

NC Employees Workplace Program Requirements for Safety and Health. Hearing Conservation

ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

CHAPTER 14 HEARING PROTECTION 14 HEARING PROTECTION. Noise Measurement. Noise Exposure Hazards. New Noise Regulation

Noise Monitoring. T. Renée Anthony, PhD, CIH, CSP University of Iowa, College of Public Health

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Selection of Hearing Protection

Hearing Conservation Training Program

Safety Services Guidance. Hearing protection

Wood Buffalo - EHS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Procedure Number 310 TVA Safety Procedure Page 1 of 6 Hearing Conservation Revision 0 January 6, 2003

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Plan

Environmental Health and Safety. Hearing Conservation Program

INDH 5131 Controls of Occupational Hazards. Noise & Hearing Conservation. Part II. V. Audiometric Testing

Hearing Conservation Program Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Appendix 1: Hearing Conservation Programme for Managing Noise Risks 30. Appendix 2: Noise Hazard Identification Checklist 31

ACOUSTIC INFRASOUND AND LOW-FREQUENCY SOUND

San Diego State University Environmental Health and Safety

Workplace hearing loss is preventable.

Hearing Conservation Plan

Hearing Conservation

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Texas Christian University

Occupational Noise. Contents. OHSS: Guidance Occupational Noise

POLICY TRAINING HEARING PROTECTION. Noise Exposure

Construction Industry Noise Exposures. Construction Industry Noise Exposures

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM (HCP)

Hearing Conservation

Environmental Health and Safety. Hearing Conservation Program

Construction Industry Noise Exposures. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences

UC Santa Barbara Hearing Conservation Program Manual

Hearing Loss and Conservation in Industrial Settings

LISTEN! You might be going deaf DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR TE TARI MAHI OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH SERVICE

MAXPRO200 Plasma Cutting System Acoustic Noise Level Measurements

Hearing Conservation Program Evaluation Checklist

SUNY Cortland Environmental Health and Safety Office Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Protection. Basic

Hearing Conservation. Wear a Protective Hearing Device NOW... or Wear a Hearing Aid LATER. Workers Health & Safety. Provided by

Prepared By: Blake Smith/James Stubbs

Safety Services Guidance. Occupational Noise

Your Company Hearing Conservation Program

INTEGRAfit : Frequently Asked Questions

Transcription:

Workplace Noise Surveys: A Hands-On Measurement Workshop Presented by: Kevin Schouppe, B.Sc. (Kin.) Ergonomics Consultant www.oshtechinc.com

Workplace Noise Surveys: Hands-On Session Description: This hands-on workshop will be of particular interest to anyone considering conducting their own workplace noise surveys, or, simply looking to gain a better understanding of the instruments and types of measures. Participants will be introduced to the basic operating procedures of common instruments and get an opportunity to use the meters to acquire spot-check and/or short-term dosimetry measures on a variety of noise sources or events. The results will be generally discussed in the context of compliance requirements, including evaluation and selection of appropriate hearing protection and common elements of a hearing conservation program.

Workplace Noise Survey: Hands-On Training Topics & Objectives: Brief Introduction 1. Introduction to workplace noise. 2. Ensure awareness of the compliance requirements. Noise Survey Workshop: Recognition, Evaluation & Control 3. Define & explain basic terms used in workplace surveys. 4. Identify & describe measurement instruments. 5. Hands-on. Practical workshop. Hearing Conservation Programs (HCP) 6. Describe various strategies for noise control. 7. Evaluate/select PPE based on workshop data & examples. 8. Identify common elements of a workplace HCP.

Introduction: Sound Pressure Level (SPL) Unbearable Single exposure may cause deafness Deafening Extreme discomfort Painful Pain threshold for most people Very high Prolonged exposure may damage hearing Moderate e.g. quiet office db Very low scarcely audible

Introduction: OH&S & WS&I Acts Question... Is a noise survey a compliance requirement in Ontario? Yes or No? Support your answer. PSST Where is the noise presently covered in our green books?

Introduction: Health & Safety Effects of Noise Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) Tinnitus

Workshop: Noise as an OH&S Hazard/Risk A Classic H&S Approach: Recognition Evaluation Control

Recognition: Basic Terms Three Types of Noise: Continuous Impact and Impulse (< 1 second duration) Intermittent

Evaluation: Why Measure? To gather data on actual employee exposures To prevent hearing loss & other health effects To determine compliance status with Ontario Noise Regulations To improve worker morale, productivity, work quality, concentration, communication interference To ensure appropriateness of HCP To determine the need for noise control strategies Refer to Workshop Materials

Evaluation: Measurement Basics Types of Workplace Surveys: Screening Survey Compliance Survey Engineering Survey Types of Common Instruments: Sound Level Meter (SLM) Noise Dosimeter Octave Band Analyzer

Evaluation: Measurement Basics Sound Level Meter (SLM): spot check measurements noise mapping (contour maps) noise source identification octave band analysis preliminary estimates of worker exposure

Evaluation: Measurement Basics Dosimeter: Time-weighted average (TWA) exposures Measurement of variable sound sources Record of maximum & minimum values Useful if worker is not stationary during shift

Evaluation: Measurement Basics Some Technical Considerations: Type of SLM Frequency Weighting Filters Exchange Rates Time Constants (Slow/Fast Response) Octave Band Analyzers

Evaluation: Measurement Basics Sample SLM Data: Point-in-time Noise Levels Activity Ambient Noise Level (db(a)) Tack Welding 89 Airgun in use 92 Air-powered screwgun in use 98 Hammering 95 Impact gun in use 99 Grinder in use 97 Shredder (operating) 90-100 Baler (operating) 87-96

Evaluation: Measurement Basics Plant Mapping:

Evaluation: Measurement Basics Sample Dosimetry Data: L eq to L ex,8 : Activity/Job Old L avg (db(a)) (5 db ER) New L eq (db(a)) (3 db ER) Automotive Assembly 74 81 Automotive Assembly spray booth 87 89 Conduct Instrumental Music Classes 83 87 Conduct Construction Classes 86 88 Tool & Die Maker 73 80 Lift Truck Driver 87 89 Press Operator 87 88

Evaluation: Measurement Basics Old versus New How They Compare Figure 1: Noise Levels (db(a)) from personal dosimetry vs. Ontario MoL Compliance Criteria Figure 2: Noise Levels (db(a)) from personal dosimetry vs. NIOSH Recommended Criteria 95 95 Noise Level (db(a)) 90 85 80 75 Ontario Criteria Noise Level (db(a)) 90 85 80 75 NIOSH Criteria 70 Niigata #1 BMC630 Matsuura #1 Leadw ell #1 Position VR11 Lift Truck Driver Tool & Die Maker 70 Niigata #1 BMC630 Matsuura #1 Leadw ell #1 VR11 Lift Truck Driver Position Tool & Die Maker

Control: HCP Controlling/Reducing Noise Exposure: At source Acoustic-engineering Encapsulation Hearing protector Collective protection Personal protection AIM TO CONTROL NOISE AT SOURCE

Control: HCP Controlling Noise under Ontario noise regulation : HPDs last resort Determine feasibility of engineering controls for noise >85 db(a) Warning signs Hearing Conservation Program

Control: HCP Administrative Controls: Limit exposure time (job rotation, expansion ) Preventive maintenance program Develop noise spec s for purchase of new equipment

Control: HCP Hearing Protection Devices (HPD s): Less protective than ratings due to improper selection, poor fit, deterioration, user discomfort, lack of user motivation. Only used as a last resort to control noise exposure Advisable for exposures to sound levels above 80 dba HCP must include training on proper selection, use & care of HPD s

Control: HCP Hearing Protection Devices (HPD s): Plugs or Earmuffs or Dual Protection? CSA Class Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) Single Number Rating (SNR) Other (e.g. new developments)

Control: HCP e.g. Derating Noise Reduction Ratings (NRR s): To account for real world conditions, NIOSH recommends: - ear muffs: = labeled NRR x 0.75 - foam & custom earplugs: = labeled NRR x 0.5 - all other earplugs: = labeled NRR x 0.3 Also, to account for the C to A adjustment (assuming workplace data is A- weighted), NIOSH recommends that the effective A-weighted noise level is: ENL = dba - (derated NRR -7)

Control: HCP A NRR Example: Workplace Noise exposure level (unprotected): Hearing Protection: ear muff with NRR of 32 94 db(a) Derated earmuff (labeled NRR x 0.75): 32 x 0.75 = 24 (db of protection) ENL = db(a) - (derated NRR -7) ENL = 94 (24-7) = 77 db(a) The effective noise level that a person wearing these muffs is exposed to is 77 dba

Control: HCP Warning Signs: Content of signs may include, but is not limited to: Identification of actual sound level in db(a) Warning of hazardous sound levels Requirement for mandatory hearing protection in area Allowable exposure duration for this area, without HPD Icons indicating that hearing protection is to be worn Other form of controls required

HCP Elements Should Include: Routine Measures/Surveys of Employee Exposures In concert with Control: HCP Audiometric Testing Engineering & Administration Controls Training Documentation & Program Evaluation To ensure compliance with the new H&S requirements! To reduce potential for NIHL & WSIB claims!

Q & A Thank you On behalf of: Kevin Schouppe, B.Sc. (Kin.) Ergonomics Consultant kschouppe@oshtechinc.com Tel: (519) 883-4727 www.oshtechinc.com