Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program

Similar documents
Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program

IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW

EXEMPT RESEARCH. Investigators should contact the IRB Office if there are questions about whether an amendment consists

Levels of IRB Review

Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures

*Explain the purpose & role of the IRB *Explain the IRB Review Categories *Discuss the potential risks to research participants

Institutional Review Board Policy and Guidelines Primary Author: Dennis M. Sullivan, MD, MA (Ethics) (Revised: 2/5/2018)

BARNARD COLLEGE Application for the Approval of the Use of Human Subjects in Research

RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS

Quorum Review IRB s Guide to Understanding expedited review? What is the process?

Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research:

Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home) Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home)

GUIDELINE FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Human Subjects Research: Overview. Colleen Kohashi and Tani Prestage Office for the Protection of Human Subjects (OPHS) February 26, 2016

Research. + Human Subjects Protections for. IRB Review and Approval at UW. October, Bailey Bodell, CIP. Reliance Administrator

Q5 If there is more than one faculty researcher, then enter co-researchers information (Name, address)

IRB for Humanists. Naomi E. Coll, MPH, CPH, CIP Manager of Research Integrity

Office of Research Compliance. Research Involving Human Subjects

OHRP Guidance on the Involvement of Prisoners in Research

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

Research Involving Human Subjects: Ethics, Process, and Guidance for Streamlining IRB Review

IRB Red Flags How to Know When IRB Review May Be Needed

Florida A&M University IRB & Investigator Manual

Type of Review Requested:

TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE

Protection of Research Subjects: The IRB Process

Navigating the Regulatory Requirements of Pediatric Research Nathan Lee, CIP Vice Chair, Schulman IRB

POLICIES GOVERNING PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH AND TEACHING AT WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

Institutional Review Board Application

APPLICATION TO INVOLVE HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH (Form IAUPRIRB-1)

Human Subjects Protection Specialist October 22 nd, 2010

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure

The AAA statement on Ethnography and Institutional Review Boards (2004) provides a useful working definition:

IRB GRAND ROUNDS SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH: NEED TO KNOW

HSPC/IRB Description of Research Form (For research projects involving human participants)

Revised August 28, 2018

Collegeof Central Florida Protection of Human Subjects

MDCH IRB REVIEW APPLICATION Authority: Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46

SALISBURY UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESEARCH APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE

SUBJECT: SJMHS Institutional Review Board(s): Vulnerable Populations - Research Involving Prisoners

Institutional Review Board. Policies and Procedures

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HANDBOOK Guide for Research involving Human Subjects Effective June 2016 with the Implementation of IRBManager

IRB FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. 1. Who must apply for human subjects review through the IRB (Institutional Research Board)?

PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION TO USE HUMAN PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH

Protection of Human Subjects In Research Principles, Policy, and Research

IRB Cheat Sheet. CASE MANAGERS: Richard D. Ramdeo, CIP Phone:

IRB Research Handbook. Research Compliance The Office of Research and Graduate Studies Southern Methodist University

Understanding Minimal Risk. Richard T. Campbell University of Illinois at Chicago

Human Subjects Application for Full IRB and Expedited Exempt Review

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Manual

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Research That Must Be Reviewed by the IRB

Policy and Procedure Regarding Use of Human Subjects in Research

Florida State University Policy 7-IRB-26

Institutional Review of Research Involving Human Participants. IRB Presentation. University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization

IRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College

Institutional Review Board (IRB) at SMU. Dr. Maribeth Kuenzi, Chair Ms. Shannon Lunt, SMU Director of Research Compliance

Ethical issues in human subjects research

DETERMINING WHETHER AN ACTIVITY IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL REGULATIONS

October 2017 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL

MC IRB Protocol No.:

Policies, Regulations and Guidelines. For. Research Involving Human Subjects

1. Comply with the NCI CIRB s requirements and directives;

CANDIDATE FOR ACCREDITATION

HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS - PRISONERS

RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN PARTICIPANTS EXPEDITED/FULL APPLICATION

Protecting Human Subjects

IRB, IDEATE, AND HSR. February, 2018 Manuel Gonzalez

IRB Policy 5 Research Activities

Guidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices

1. What is your role in the AAHRPP accreditation process?

Determining risk for research involving children. Angela Bain, IRB Specialist

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG Human Research Ethics Committee for Non-Clinical Faculties Application Form for Ethical Approval

Last Name First name Academic degrees. Professional titles and/or work position within your home institution

Human Subject Institutional Review Board Proposal Form

Scientific Misconduct September 15, Presented by May Al Kassar

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Handbook

Understanding Minimal Risk in SBR: NRC Recommendations for Proposed Changes to the Common Rule

Policy and Procedures. On Use of Human Subjects in Research

IRB review of device studies

Student Handbook: Making Sense of Human Subjects Research

Policies and Procedures Manual Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB)

IDENTIFYING, ASSESSING, AND RESOLVING ISSUES IN SOCIAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (SBER)

Investigator s Handbook for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Institutional Review Board Revised February 23, 2017

APPLICATION/RESEARCH PROTOCOL REVIEW FORM

IRB Reviewer Worksheet for Expedited Reviews

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure

PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS

Rockhurst University Institutional Review Board

CANDIDATE FOR ACCREDITATION

IRB APPLICATION GUIDANCE

Oregon Health & Science University Office of Research Integrity Guidance on Human Subjects Research with Decisionally Impaired Adults

AN INVESTIGATOR S GUIDE TO RESEARCH WITH HUMAN PARTICIPANTS

Policies and Procedures of the McKendree University Institutional Review Board

Institutional Research Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

TOBACCO PRODUCT OR MEDICAL PRODUCT?

Use of Standards in Substantial Equivalence Determinations

Summary of Changes to Human Subjects Regulations: Effective January 21, 2019

Deborah Watkins-Bruner, Ph.D. Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111

IRB Review Points to Consider September 2016

Transcription:

Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program Exempt Research and Expedited Review March 2013 Unclassified Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited

IRB Review Decision Tree 1. Is it research? No IRB review needed 2. Is it human subjects research? 3. Does it meet exempt criteria? 4. Is it Minimal Risk? 5. Does it fall into one of the expedited categories? No IRB review needed Chair/Vice-Chair determination Full Board Review Chair/Vice-Chair review Minimal Risk but Full Board Review 2

Exempt Research Principal Investigators cannot make exemption determination Determination must be made by Chair or Vice Chair, designated IRB administrators, or designated officials of the DON HRPP 3

Does the research activity meet one or more of the six Exempt categories? (1)Research in educational settings, involving normal educational practices (2)& (3) Research on use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures or observation of public behavior, with differences on identifying subjects and damages of disclosure (4)Research with existing* data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens; cannot be identified* (5) Research and demonstration projects (6) Taste and food quality tests 4

Exempt Research Existing* means existing before the research is proposed to the designated institutional official or the IRB for a determination of exemption. Cannot be identified* means there is no link between the participant and participant s data 5

IRB Review Decision Tree 1. Is it research? No IRB review needed 2. Is it human subjects research? 3. Does it meet exempt criteria? 4. Is it Minimal Risk? 5. Does it fall into one of the expedited categories? No IRB review needed Chair/Vice-Chair determination Full Board Review Chair/Vice-Chair review Minimal Risk but Full Board Review 6

Only Chair or Vice Chair may review and make recommendation for approval May use consultants Expedited Review Chair or Vice Chair may exercise all of the authority of the IRB except disapproval Disapproval may only be recommended by a fully convened board All criteria for IRB review must be considered (criteria at 32 CFR 219.111, consent, pregnant women, children, etc.) 7

An IRB may use the expedited review procedure to review either or both of the following: (1) Some or all of the research appearing on the list (list of categories as published as a Notice in the Federal Register) and found by the reviewer to involve no more than minimal risk, (2) Minor changes in previously approved research during the period (of one year or less) for which approval is authorized. 32 CFR 216.110 Two Categories of Expedited Review 8

Minimal Risk Minimal risk: the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research -are not greater in and among themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or -during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests. 9

Minimal Risk Evaluating Risk The phrase ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests in the definition of minimal risk shall not be interpreted to include the inherent risks certain categories of human subjects face in their everyday life. DoDI 3216.02 Enclosure 3, 6.b. 10

Minimal Risk Example: If the research will involve asking a diver during a routine (already scheduled) dive to test a new fin, the IRB does T consider the dive in determining risk. However, if the research will involve asking a diver to make an additional dive to test a new fin, the IRB DOES consider the dive in determining risk. 11

Expedited Review Categories 1. Clinical studies of drugs and medical devices only when (a) the research is on drugs for which an investigational new drug application (21 CFR 312) is not required or (b) the research is on medical devices for which (i) an investigational device exemption application (21 CFR 812) is not required or (ii) the medical device is cleared/approved for marketing and the medical device is being used in accordance with its cleared/approved labeling. 2. Collection of blood samples by finger stick, heel stick, ear stick, or venipuncture. 12

Expedited Review Categories 3. Prospective collection of biological specimens for research purposes by noninvasive means. 4. Collection of data through non invasive procedures (not involving general anesthesia or sedation) routinely employed in clinical practice, excluding procedures involving x rays or microwaves. 5. Research involving materials (data, documents, records, or specimens) that have been collected, or will be collected, solely for non research purposes (such as medical treatment or diagnosis).* *The DoD allows the materials to have been collected for ANY purpose. DoDI 3216.02 Enclosure 3, 3.a.(3) 13

Expedited Review Categories 6.Collection of data from voice, video, digital, or image recordings made for research purposes. 7.Research on individual or group characteristics or behavior (including, but not limited to, research on perception, cognition, motivation, identity, language, communication, cultural beliefs or practices, and social behavior) or research employing survey, interview, oral history, focus group, program evaluation, human factors evaluation, or quality assurance methodologies. 14

Expedited Review Categories 8. Continuing review of research previously approved by the convened board where enrollment is permanently closed (all subjects must have completed all research related interventions and the research is active for only for long-term follow-up) OR no subjects have been enrolled or the only activity is data analysis. 9. Continuing review or research where categories 2-8 do not apply and the convened IRB determined that the research involves no greater than minimal risk. Federal Register Notice (Vol 63, No 216, pp 60364-60367) 15

Minor Changes in Previously Approved Research Minor changes not defined in CFR, DoDI, or SECNAVINST Command policies should define Examples of changes that might be considered minor: Administrative changes to consents Typographical error corrections (if they don t change major issues like drug dosing) Changes to advertisements Examples of changes that are not considered minor: Change in PI Extending duration of exposure to test material or intervention 16

Documentation and Notification Determination of exempt or expedited should be documented with: The category into which the research falls and, The justification for why the research falls into the category. Document findings for all IRB review criteria All members of the IRB must be notified of research approved under expedited procedures. 17

Questions Please contact DON HRPP with any follow-up questions or concerns. Phone: 703-681-9629 Email: human.research@med.navy.mil Director, DON HRPP: CAPT William Deniston 18