Rapid shock reversal is critically important to saving lives. In the hopes of improving pediatric septic shock outcomes, the

Similar documents
IV fluid administration in sepsis. Dr David Inwald Consultant in PICU St Mary s Hospital, London CATS, London

Adherence to PALS Sepsis Guidelines and Hospital Length of Stay

Pediatric Shock. National Pediatric Nighttime Curriculum Written by Julia M. Gabhart, M.D. Lucile Packard Children s Hospital at Stanford

3/14/2017. Pediatric Sepsis: From Goal Directed Therapy to Protocolized Care. Objectives. Developmental Response to Sepsis

Staging Sepsis for the Emergency Department: Physician

Pediatric Sepsis Treatment:

towards early goal directed therapy

Low Cardiac Output in the Pediatric Patient

Are Patients Hypoperfused in the ED? Rapid Perfusion Assessment in the Emergency Department

Updates On Sepsis Updates based on 2016 updates on sepsis from The International Surviving Sepsis Campaign

Early Goal-Directed Therapy

Current State of Pediatric Sepsis. Jason Clayton, MD PhD Pediatric Critical Care 9/19/2018

Objectives. Management of Septic Shock. Definitions Progression of sepsis. Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Major goals of therapy

Early-goal-directed therapy and protocolised treatment in septic shock

What is. InSpectra StO 2?

Pediatric Advanced Life Support

Sepsis: Identification and Management in an Acute Care Setting

Research Article Correlation between Arterial Lactate and Central Venous Lactate in Children with Sepsis

Role of PoCT in Goal-Directed Therapy in Critical Care Settings

Troubleshooting Audio

Fluid Resuscitation and Monitoring in Sepsis. Deepa Gotur, MD, FCCP Anne Rain T. Brown, PharmD, BCPS

EUROANESTHESIA 2008 Copenhagen, Denmark, 31 May - 3 June 2008 CENTRAL VENOUS OXYGEN SATURATION (SCVO 2 ): INTEREST AND LIMITATIONS

Septic Shock. Rontgene M. Solante, MD, FPCP,FPSMID

Early goal-directed therapy Where to from here? Rinaldo Bellomo ANZIC Research Centre Melbourne, Australia

Evidence- Based Medicine Fluid Therapy

SEPSIS: IT ALL BEGINS WITH INFECTION. Theresa Posani, MS, RN, ACNS-BC, CCRN M/S CNS/Sepsis Coordinator Texas Health Harris Methodist Ft.

SHOCK. Emergency pediatric PICU division Pediatric Department Medical Faculty, University of Sumatera Utara H. Adam Malik Hospital

No conflicts of interest to disclose

PulsioFlex Patient focused flexibility

SEPSIS SYNDROME

Assessing Patients During Septic Shock Resuscitation

Date written: April 2014 Review date: April 2016 Related documents: Paediatric Sepsis 6

Presented by: Indah Dwi Pratiwi

Comparison of a novel rapid fluid delivery device to traditional methods

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Why measure cardiac output in critically ill children?

Sepsis in Children. Department of Pediatric Anesthesilogy and Critical Care, University Children s Hospital Brno, Czech Republic

International Journal of Pediatrics and Neonatal Health

The ABC of CAB- Circulation, Airway, Breathing: PALS/Resuscitation Update

How can the PiCCO improve protocolized care?

Department of Intensive Care Medicine UNDERSTANDING CIRCULATORY FAILURE IN SEPSIS

Core Measures SEPSIS UPDATES

Frank Sebat, MD - June 29, 2006

Sepsis Bundle Project (SEP) Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: April 2015 Most recent Revision: December 2018

Printed copies of this document may not be up to date, obtain the most recent version from

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE CPD EVENING. Dr Alastair Morgan Wednesday 13 th September 2017

Sepsis Awareness and Education

(Peripheral) Temperature and microcirculation

Episode 50 Pediatric Sepsis With Dr. Sarah Reid & Dr. Gina Neto. Pediatric Sepsis

BC Sepsis Network Emergency Department Sepsis Guidelines

The Septic Patient. Dr Arunraj Navaratnarajah. Renal SpR Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust

Approach to Severe Sepsis. Jan Hau Lee, MBBS, MRCPCH. MCI Children s Intensive Care Unit KK Women s and Children's Hospital, Singapore

Immunomodulation and Sepsis in Oncological Patients. Imad Haddad, M.D. Medical Director, PICU Banner Children s Hospital at BDMC

Pediatric Septic Shock. Geoffrey M. Fleming M.D. Division of Pediatric Critical Care Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville, Tennessee

Shock and hemodynamic monitorization. Nilüfer Yalındağ Öztürk Marmara University Pendik Research and Training Hospital

How and why I give IV fluid Disclosures SCA Fluids and public health 4/1/15. Andrew Shaw MB FRCA FCCM FFICM

Stayin Alive: Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) Updated Guidelines

Sepsis Update: Focus on Early Recognition and Intervention. Disclosures

Fluid bolus of 20% Albumin in post-cardiac surgical patient: a prospective observational study of effect duration

Patient Safety Safe Table Webcast: Sepsis (Part III and IV) December 17, 2014

Evidence-Based. Management of Severe Sepsis. What is the BP Target?

EFFECT OF EARLY VASOPRESSIN VS NOREPINEPHRINE ON KIDNEY FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK. Alexandria Rydz

Red blood cell transfusions in the PICU: What & When

Impact of Fluids in Children with Acute Lung Injury

Sepsis or Severe Sepsis? Is there a right thing, and how do we do it?

Morris A. Blajchman, MD, FRCP(C) Emeritus Professor, McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA

Initial Resuscitation of Sepsis & Septic Shock

What you need. When you need it. EV1000 Clinical Platform

Sepsis Wave II Webinar Series. Sepsis Reassessment

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

Paediatric Shock. Dr Andrew Pittaway Department of Anaesthesia Bristol Royal Hospital for Children Bristol, UK

Preparing for your upcoming PALS course

Sepsis Story At Intermountain Healthcare Intensive Medicine Clinical Program

UTILITY of ScvO 2 and LACTATE

Full Disclosure. The case for why it matters. Goal-directed Fluid Resuscitation

Hemodynamic Monitoring and Circulatory Assist Devices

End-tidal carbon dioxide is associated with mortality and lactate in patients with suspected sepsis

Dr. F Javier Belda Dept. Anesthesiology and Critical Care Hospital Clinico Universitario Valencia (Spain) Pulsion MAB

Sepsis Management: Past, Present, and Future

Blood Transfusion Practice Indicated by Paediatric Intensive Care Specialists in Response to Four Clinical Scenarios

Management of Cardiogenic Shock. Dr Stephen Pettit, Consultant Cardiologist

Value of Point-of-care Ketones in Assessing Dehydration and Acidosis in Children With Gastroenteritis

Updates in Emergency Department Management of Sepsis

Nothing to disclose 9/25/2017

9/25/2017. Nothing to disclose

Fluids in Sepsis: How much and what type? John Fowler, MD, FACEP Kent Hospital, İzmir Eisenhower Medical Center, USA American Hospital Dubai, UAE

Obligatory joke. The case for why it matters. Sepsis: More is more. Goal-Directed Fluid Resuscitation 6/1/2013

The Ever Changing World of Sepsis Management. Laura Evans MD MSc Medical Director of Critical Care Bellevue Hospital

Accepted Manuscript. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Septic Shock: Heroic Futility? Francis D. Pagani, MD PhD

Septic Shock and Awe. Pediatrics

Fluid Resuscitation in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

Exclusion Criteria 1. Operator or supervisor feels specific intra- procedural laryngoscopy device will be required.

Brief summary of the NICE guidelines December 2013

Taking the shock factor out of shock

Sepsis Combine experience and Evidence. Eran Segal, MD Director General ICU, Sheba Medical Center, Israel

What the ED clinician needs to know about SEPSIS - 3. Anna Morgan Consultant EM Barts Health

Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2012 & Update for David E. Tannehill, DO Critical Care Medicine Mercy Hospital St.

Sepsis 3.0: The Impact on Quality Improvement Programs

MANAGEMENT OF CIRCULATORY FAILURE

SEPSIS UPDATE WHY DO WE NEED A CORE MEASURE CHAD M. KOVALA DO, FACOEP, FACEP

Fluid Boluses in Preterm Babies with Poor Perfusion: A Hot Potato. Win Tin The James Cook University Hospital University of Durham

Transcription:

A Normal Capillary Refill Time of # 2 Seconds is Associated with Superior Vena Cava Oxygen Saturations of $ 70% Patricia L. Raimer, MD, Yong Y. Han, MD, Monica S. Weber, RN, Gail M. Annich, MD, and Joseph R. Custer, MD Objective To test the hypothesis that a normal capillary refill time (CRT) # 2 seconds is associated with superior vena cava oxygen saturation (ScvO 2 ) $ 70% in critically ill children. Study design Two-year, prospective study in a tertiary-level pediatric intensive care unit. Whenever ScvO 2 measurements were obtained, central (forehead/sternum) and peripheral (finger/toe) CRTs were concomitantly assessed. Results Central and peripheral CRTs # 2 seconds were both associated with ScvO 2 $ 70% (P <.01). Sensitivity/ specificity analyses revealed that central CRT # 2 seconds demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.4%, specificity of 71.4%, positive predictive value of 93.1%, and negative predictive value of 50.0% in predicting ScvO 2 $ 70%. Peripheral CRT # 2 seconds had a sensitivity of 71.9%, specificity of 85.7%, positive predictive value of 95.8%, and negative predictive value of 40.0% in predicting ScvO 2 $ 70%. Conclusions A normal CRT # 2 seconds can be predictive of ScvO 2 $ 70%. Our study corroborates the recommendations of the Pediatric Advanced Life Support curricula targeting a normal CRT # 2 seconds as a therapeutic endpoint for goal-directed shock resuscitation. This clinical target remains particularly relevant in community hospitals when the ability to obtain central venous catheter access may be limited and ScvO 2 data unavailable. (J Pediatr 2011;158:968-72). Rapid shock reversal is critically important to saving lives. In the hopes of improving pediatric septic shock outcomes, the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) has published Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock, 1,2 which advocates early septic shock recognition and aggressive implementation of time-sensitive therapies to reverse shock. These guidelines present an easy-to-follow, stepwise resuscitation algorithm that has been adopted by the American Heart Association s Subcommittee on Pediatric Resuscitation and incorporated into its Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) curricula. 3 Goal-directed resuscitation for this algorithm targets superior vena cava oxygen saturations (ScvO 2 ) $ 70% as one of its therapeutic endpoints. This recommendation stems from data from an interventional study in adults 4 and more recently in children 5 that have demonstrated significant improvements in septic shock survival with this target endpoint. However, because pediatric-specialized care in the United States is largely regionalized, most seriously ill children present first to community hospitals where resources and expertise to place central venous catheters (CVCs) in children may be limited, and consequently, ScvO 2 measurements may not be available. In one observational study, fewer than 30% of children in persistent septic shock had CVCs placed by community physicians before being transported to a regional children s hospital. 6 Therefore, recommendations for goal-directed septic shock resuscitation in the community hospital setting might benefit from a more easily obtainable, alternative target to ScvO 2 $ 70% as a therapeutic endpoint. PALS curricula additionally recommend using capillary refill time (CRT) to evaluate systemic circulation and perfusion because it is noninvasive and easy to perform. Although some controversy still remains, a normal CRT is often considered to be # 2 seconds in healthy, nonstressed children. 7 In this regard, we speculated whether a normal CRT # 2 could potentially serve as surrogate target to ScvO 2 $ 70% during shock resuscitation. We sought to determine whether a relationship between CRT and ScvO 2 might exist, testing the hypothesis that CRT would inversely correlate with ScvO 2 in a manner such that that a normal CRT # 2 seconds would be associated with ScvO 2 $ 70%. Additionally, we sought to determine whether CRT assessed on a central region of the body might differ from one assessed on a peripheral region. We hypothesized that centrally assessed CRT would be superior to peripherally assessed CRT in predicting ScvO 2 $ 70%. ACCM CRT CVC PALS PICU PPV ROC ScvO 2 VBG 968 American College of Critical Care Medicine Capillary refill time Central venous catheter Pediatric advanced life support Pediatric intensive care unit Positive predictive value Receiver operator characteristic Superior vena cava oxygen saturation Venous blood gas From the Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, C.S. Mott Children s Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI The authors declare no conflicts of interest. 0022-3476/$ - see front matter. Copyright ª 2011 Mosby Inc. All rights reserved. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.11.062

Vol. 158, No. 6 June 2011 Methods Institutional Review Board approval for this study was granted by the University of Michigan Health System s Human Rights Committee. Any critically-ill child who was admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at C. S. Mott Children s Hospital during the 2-year study period (May 2007 to May 2009) and required CVC placement for medical management (with the CVC tip located in the superior vena cava) was potentially eligible for the study. The diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock was not a necessary prerequisite for study eligibility. Consent for study participation was obtained from the child s parent(s) or legal guardian(s) and when feasible, assent was additionally obtained from any child $ 8 years of age. All patients received routine medical care as directed by the PICU and co-managing or consultant services. Whenever the management team(s) ordered a venous blood gas (VBG) measurement, which also included venous oxygen saturation, lactate, and hemoglobin data, central (forehead or sternum) and peripheral (finger or toe) CRTs were concomitantly assessed with a hand-held stopwatch. CRT measurements were performed by a PICU fellow or attending who may or may not have been involved in the care of the patient at the time. Other than requesting that the assessor use a designated hand-held stopwatch, no specific instructions were given regarding how CRT assessments should be performed. CRT measurements were rounded to the nearest 1/10th of a second and were recorded along with the patient s vital signs (including pulse oximeter oxygen saturation). Patients may or may not have been receiving active shock resuscitation at the time of VBG sampling. The dose(s) of continuous vasoactive infusion(s) at the time of VBG collection were noted, and vasoactive-inotropic scores were calculated. 8,9 Although a recent clinical trial in critically ill children had shown that a hemoglobin concentration as low as 7.0 g/dl is generally well tolerated, 10 in greater accordance to the interventional studies on goal-directed septic shock resuscitation, 4,5 clinically significant anemia for this study was defined as hemoglobin concentration <10.0 g/dl. Clinically significant fever was defined as body temperature > 38.5 C. 11 Patients were excluded from the study if they had uncorrected cyanotic heart disease, and data were excluded if a patient had hypoxia (oxygen saturation < 95%) at the time of VBG sampling. Data are presented as median [25 percentile to 75 percentile] for continuous data and percent (%) for categorical data. Differences between groups were determined by the Mann- Whitney test for continuous data and the c 2 or Fisher exact test for categorical data. Significant correlations between ScvO 2 and CRT (central and peripheral) were determined by use of the Pearson product-moment correlation. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and with the definition that a normal CRT is # 2 seconds, 7 sensitivity/specificity analyses were performed to determine CRT # 2 seconds ability in predicting ScvO 2 $ 70%. In addition, because both oxygen carrying capacity and rate of oxygen consumption (ie, metabolic rate) can affect ScvO 2, multiple logistical regression analyses were performed to determine CRT # 2 seconds ability to predict ScvO 2 $ 70% while controlling for clinically significant anemia (which reduces oxygen carrying capacity) and fever (which increases metabolic rate and oxygen consumption). Regression validity was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results Although consent/assent for study participation had been obtained for 78 children, because not all patients required VBG measurements during their PICU admission and many had CVCs placed into their femoral veins, data were limited to only 22 children. One additional patient was eliminated from study due to hypoxia at the time of data collection, leaving 21 patients available for analyses (Table I). A median of 2 (1 to 3) VBG measurements were obtained per patient, contributing to a total of 39 paired CRT-VBG data for analyses. Twenty-five (64.1%) VBG samples were obtained while the patient was receiving a continuous vasoactive infusion; the median vasoactive-inotropic score at the time of sampling was 5 (0 to 17.5). Nineteen (48.7%) VBG samples had lactate concentrations > 2 mmol/l; the median lactate concentration was 2.05 (1.10 to 4.90) mmol/l. Figure 1 illustrates that both central and peripheral CRT significantly correlated inversely with ScvO 2. Figure 2 shows the ROC curve evaluating central and peripheral CRTs ability to predict ScvO 2 $ 70%. Somewhat fortuitously, the point of optional discrimination was 2.0 seconds for both central and peripheral CRT. Central and peripheral CRTs # 2 seconds were both significantly associated with ScvO 2 $ 70% (P <.01 for both by c 2 ). Sensitivity/specificity analyses revealed that central CRT # 2 seconds demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.4%, specificity of Table I. Patient characteristics Patients (N = 21) Age (months [25 th 75 th percentile]) 45 [11.5-143.5] Sex (n, %) Female 12 (57.1%) Male 9 (42.9%) PRISM III (score [25 th 75 th percentile]) 12 [6.75-18.75] Diagnosis (n, %) Severe sepsis/septic shock/mods 12 (57.1%) Pneumonia/Acute respiratory failure 6 (38.5%) Meningitis 1 (4.8%) Pulmonary hemorrhage 1 (4.8%) Viral myocarditis 1 (4.8%) Comorbidities (n, %) No comorbidity 5 (23.8%) Liver disease 4 (19.0%) History of prematurity 3 (14.3%) Neurologic disease 3 (14.3%) Renal disease 2 (9.5%) Oncologic disease 2 (9.5%) Metabolic disease 2 (9.5%) PRISM, Pediatric Risk of Mortality; MODS, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. 969

THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS www.jpeds.com Vol. 158, No. 6 Figure 2. ROC curves depicting the ability of central and peripheral CRTs to predict ScvO 2 $ 70%. The point of optimal discrimination was 2.0 seconds for both central and peripheral CRT. Figure 1. A, Central and B, peripheral CRT correlated inversely with ScvO 2. 71.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.1%, and negative predictive value of 50.0% in predicting ScvO 2 $ 70%. Peripheral CRT # 2 seconds had a sensitivity of 71.9%, specificity of 85.7%, PPV of 95.8%, and negative predictive value of 40.0% in predicting ScvO 2 $ 70%. Logistical regression analyses also confirmed significant associations between both central and peripheral CRTs # 2 seconds and ScvO 2 $ 70% while adjusting for clinically significant anemia or fever (Table II). Discussion The American Heart Association s Subcommittee on Pediatric Resuscitation, through its PALS curricula, advocates the use of CRT to quickly assess perfusion in children. 3 PALS teaches that prolonged CRT is an early clinical indicator of compensated shock that results from physiologic mechanisms that try to redirect blood flow from nonvital to vital organs as a means to preserve critical perfusion to the latter. Systemic vascular resistance is increased in order to maintain normal blood pressure for age, and this compensatory response causes the skin to become cool and pale, peripheral pulses to become weak, and CRT to become prolonged. Interventions such as aggressive fluid resuscitation with or without inotropic support performed during this early phase of shock can be quite effective in restoring global circulation and perfusion and reversing the shock state, whereas a failure to intervene allows for continued progression to uncompensated shock with the development of frank hypotension and possibly cardiopulmonary arrest. 3 Interventions performed during this latter phase of shock may be less effective in reversing the shock state and altering patient outcome. PALS recommendations to use CRT as a bedside clinical tool have been supported by studies in hospitalized infants with severe dehydration, a common cause of pediatric shock. 12,13 Saavedra et al 12 demonstrated that CRT directly correlated to the degree of dehydration with a CRT of > 3 seconds indicating a fluid deficit of more than 100 ml/kg. Steiner et al 13 found that prolonged CRT had a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 85% for detecting 5% dehydration in infants and children. Table II. Multiple logistical regression analyses of central and peripheral CRT # 2 seconds in predicting ScvO 2 $ 70%: odds ratios with 95% CI OR Variable Covariable (s) [95% CI] Central CRT 2 seconds Peripheral CRT 2 seconds T, temperature. None 13.500 [2.025-90.012] Hemoglobin < 10.0 g/dl 22.429 [1.907-263.843] T > 38.5 C 17.738 [1.573-200.076] Hemoglobin < 10.0 g/dl, 41.578 [2.080-831.229] T > 38.5 C None 15.333 [1.611-145.901] Hemoglobin < 10.0 g/dl 15.255 [1.543-150.775] T > 38.5 C 25.110 [1.556-405.148] Hemoglobin < 10.0 g/dl, 37.531 [1.746-806.905] T > 38.5 C 970 Raimer et al

June 2011 ORIGINAL ARTICLES In addition to assessing dehydration, several studies have evaluated CRT as a predictor of illness severity. The World Health Organization has incorporated CRT as part of the circulatory assessment in their Emergency Triage and Assessment Guidelines published in 1999. 14 Based on these recommendations, a study published by Evans et al 15 found that prolonged CRT > 2 seconds was an independent prognostic indicator of death in children with severe and complicated malaria in Ghana, observing that patients with severe anemia and prolonged CRT had a twofold higher risk of dying. A recent study by Thompson et al 16 found that children presenting to a pediatric assessment unit in England with serious infections were significantly more likely than children with minor infections to have abnormal vital signs, including a CRT > 2 seconds. 16 Although not without limitations, CRT can be a useful adjunct to provide quick and valuable information in various settings and clinical situations. In this study we observe that CRT inversely correlates with ScvO 2, but not unexpectedly, the strength of this relationship is modest, thusly limiting CRTs ability to predict any specific ScvO 2 value. However, we submit that this may be an incorrect application of this simple clinical tool which may be better used in a dichotomous manner (ie, normal vs prolonged ). Taking this latter approach, we find that a normal CRT # 2 seconds possesses a high PPV in its ability to predict ScvO 2 $ 70%; or in other words, we speculate that normalization of CRT may be a reassuring clinical finding that therapeutic interventions are most likely achieving the ScvO 2 $ 70% target recommended by ACCM guidelines during septic shock resuscitation. Our study findings help to strengthen the congruence between PALS recommendations and ACCM guidelines because resuscitation targeting normal CRT # 2 seconds (emphasized by PALS recommendations) most likely also targets the desired physiological goal of ScvO 2 $ 70% (emphasized by ACCM guidelines). Cool, ambient temperatures may cause peripheral vasoconstriction and prolonged CRT in babies and children who have been undressed for their well-child exams. Gorelick et al 17 demonstrated that CRT measured on a finger was significantly greater among children assessed in a cool room (19.4 C) compared with those assessed in a warm room (25.7 C) (2.39 0.76 seconds vs 0.85 0.45 seconds, respectively). The effects of cool environmental temperature on peripheral CRT can limit its usefulness as a clinical tool in this regard. Although we had speculated that CRT assessment on a central body location such as the forehead or sternum might be more resistant to the effects of ambient temperature and therefore might be more reliable than peripheral CRT assessment, our investigation did not support our hypothesis that that assessment of central CRT would be superior to the more common practice of assessing CRT on the finger or toe in predicting ScvO 2 $ 70%. Although additional investigations will be needed to verify whether a normal CRT # 2 seconds can be used as a surrogate target to ScvO 2 $ 70% in the community hospital setting, two observational studies do lend support for this concept. Han et al 6 reported in a single institutional study that successful shock reversal (defined as normalization of systolic blood pressure for age and CRT # 3 seconds) by community physicians was associated with a > ninefold increased odds of survival. And in a follow-up multi-institutional study involving five regional pediatric centers, Carcillo et al 18 recently reported that early shock reversal (again, defined as normalization of systolic blood pressure for age and CRT # 3 seconds) by community physicians was significantly associated with reduced mortality (5.06% vs 16.37%) and functional morbidity (1.56% vs 4.11%) rates. One might speculate whether shock reversal with CRT # 2 seconds as the clinical target (as opposed to CRT # 3 seconds) might have been associated with even better outcomes. On the other hand, the investigation by de Oliveria et al, 5 which was conducted at two large, university-affiliated PICUs in Brazil, demonstrated the superiority of ScvO 2 $ 70% as an additional physiological target for goal-directed septic shock resuscitation. These authors observed significantly better 28-day mortality rates among children who had been resuscitated to clinical shock reversal (which included CRT # 2 seconds) plus ScvO 2 $ 70% compared with those who had been resuscitated to clinical shock reversal alone (11.8% vs 39.2%, respectively) 5 Collectively, these studies suggest that although CRT # 2 seconds might be a reasonable surrogate clinical target at community hospitals when appropriate CVC access cannot be attained, CRT # 2 seconds should not substitute for ScvO 2 $ 70% as the ultimate physiological target of shock resuscitation when pediatric-specialized care capabilities are readily available. There are several limitations to this study that we acknowledge. First, we concede to having a small study and sample size on which data analyses were performed, and appropriate caution should be exercised in this regard. We certainly welcome additional studies of larger magnitude that will hopefully corroborate our study observations. Second, because of our small sample population we did not make statistical adjustments for making repeat observations for some patients but rather treated each observation as an independent event. We acknowledge that our assumption of observational independence may not be entirely valid. Third, other than using a hand-held stopwatch, no efforts were made to standardize the technique by which CRT measurements was assessed, nor were any efforts made to control for interobserver differences or adjust for any ambient room temperature fluctuations. However, we intentionally avoided standardization of CRT technique to better reflect clinical practice which has been reported to be quite varied. 19 In fact, we submit that our methodologic approach imparts a greater likelihood that our observations can be reproduced in an actual clinical setting than had we applied a rigorously controlled assessment of CRT. We conclude that CRT in critically-ill children inversely correlates with ScvO 2 in a manner such that a CRT # 2 seconds can predict ScvO 2 $ 70%. These data support PALS recommendations for goal-directed shock resuscitation targeting a normal CRT # 2 seconds. This target endpoint remains particularly relevant in community A Normal Capillary Refill Time of # 2 Seconds is Associated with Superior Vena Cava Oxygen Saturations of $ 70% 971

THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS www.jpeds.com Vol. 158, No. 6 hospitals when CVC access may be limited and ScvO 2 data unavailable. n Submitted for publication Jul 13, 2010; last revision received Sep 22, 2010; accepted Nov 30, 2010. References 1. Carcillo JA, Fields AI. American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force Committee Members. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal patients in septic shock. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1365-78. 2. Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K, Cornell T, Decaen A, Deymann A, et al. 2007 American College of Critical Care Medicine clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock. Crit Care Med 2009;37:666-88. 3. Ralston M, Hazinski MF, Zaritsky A, Schexnayder SM, Kleinman ME, eds. Pediatric advanced life support provider manual. Dallas: American Heart Association; 2006. 4. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368-77. 5. de Oliveira CF, de Oliveira DS, Gottschald AF, Moura JD, Costa GA, Ventura AC, et al. ACCM/PALS haemodynamic support guidelines for paediatric septic shock: an outcomes comparison with and without monitoring central venous oxygen saturation. Intensive Care Med 2008;34:1065-75. 6. Han YY, Carcillo JA, Dragotta MA, Bills DM, Watson RS, Westerman ME, et al. Early reversal of pediatric-neonatal septic shock by community physicians is associated with improved outcome. Pediatrics 2003;112:793-9. 7. Schriger DL, Baraff L. Defining normal capillary refill: variation with age, sex, and temperature. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:932-5. 8. Wernovsky G, Wypij D, Jonas RA, Mayer JE, Hanley FL, Hickey PR, et al. Postoperative course and hemodynamic profile after the arterial switch operation in neonates and infants. A comparison of low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. Circulation 1995;92: 2226-35. 9. Gaies MG, Gurney JG, Yen AH, Napoli ML, Gajarski RJ, Charpie JR, et al. Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in infants after cardiopulmonary bypass. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2010;11:234-8. 10. Lacroix J, Hebert PC, Hutchison JS, Hume HA, Tucci M, Ducruet T, et al. Transfusion strategies for patients in pediatric intensive care units. New Engl J Med 2007;356:1609-19. 11. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A, International Consensus Conference on Pediatric Sepsis. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005;6:2-8. 12. Saavedra JM, Harris GD, Li S, Finberg L. Capillary refilling (skin turgor) in the assessment of dehydration. Am J Dis Child 1991;145:296-8. 13. Steiner MJ, DeWalt DA, Byerley JS. Is this child dehydrated? JAMA 2004; 291:2746-54. 14. Gove S, Tamburlini G, Molyneux E, Whitesell P, Campbell H, for the WHO Integrated Management of Childhood Illness Referral Care Project. Development and technical basis of simplified guidelines for emergency triage assessment and treatement in developing countries. Arch Dis Child 1999;81:473-7. 15. Evans JA, May J, Ansong D, Antwi S, Asofo-Adjei E, Nguah SB, et al. Capillary refill time as an independent prognostic indicator in severe and complicated malaria. J Pediatr 2006;149:676-81. 16. Thompson M, Coad N, Harnden A, Mayon-White R, Perera R, Mant D. How well do vital signs identify children with serious infections in paediatric emergency care? Arch Dis Child 2009;94:888-93. 17. Gorelick MH, Shaw KN, Baker MD. Effect of ambient temperature on capillary refill in healthy children. Pediatrics 1993;92:699-702. 18. Carcillo JA, Kuch BA, Han YY, Day S, Greenwald BM, McClosky KA, et al. Mortality and functional morbidity after use of PALS/APLS by community physicians. Pediatrics 2009;124:500-8. 19. Lobos AT, Menon K. A multidisciplinary survey on capillary refill time: inconsistent performance and interpretation of a common clinical test. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008;9:386-91. 972 Raimer et al