Stimulation of the Sacral Anterior Root Combined with Posterior Sacral Rhizotomy in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury. Original Policy Date

Similar documents
Technologies and architectures" Stimulator, electrodes, system flexibility, reliability, security, etc."

Electrostimulation Part 3: Bladder dysfunctions

LOSS OF BLADDER CONTROL causes some of the most

GBM8320 Dispositifs Médicaux Intelligents. Electrostimulation. Part 3: Bladder dysfunctions

Spinal Cord Injury. R Hamid Consultant Neuro-Urologist London Spinal Injuries Unit, Stanmore & National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, UCLH

The Neurogenic Bladder

Regulation of the Urinary Bladder Chapter 26

NEUROGENIC BLADDER. Dr Harriet Grubb Dr Alison Seymour Dr Alexander Joseph

information Sacral Anterior Root Stimulator (SARS) and Dorsal Rhizotomy (1 of 5) What is a sacral anterior root stimulator? How does the implant work?

The Praxis FES System and Bladder/Bowel Management in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

03/13/18. A. Symptoms lasting for greater than or equal to 12 months that have resulted to significant impairment in activities of daily living; and

TREATMENT METHODS FOR DISORDERS OF SMALL ANIMAL BLADDER FUNCTION

Original Policy Date

Summary. Neuro-urodynamics. The bladder cycle. and voiding. 14/12/2015. Neural control of the LUT Initial assessment Urodynamics

Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation

Renal Physiology: Filling of the Urinary Bladder, Micturition, Physiologic Basis of some Renal Function Tests. Amelyn R.

Physiologic Anatomy and Nervous Connections of the Bladder

GUIDELINES ON NEUROGENIC LOWER URINARY TRACT DYSFUNCTION

POLICIES AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

Urodynamics in Neurological Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction. Mr Chris Harding Consultant Urologist Freeman Hospital Newcastle-upon-Tyne

Recommandations de prise en charge des vessies neurogènes EAU 2006

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM), using permanent foramen S3 electrode, Early versus late treatment of voiding dysfunction with pelvic neuromodulation

Coding for Sacral Neuromodulation

NEUROMODULATION FOR UROGYNAECOLOGISTS

OHTAC Recommendation

SUPRAPUBIC PUNCTURE IN THE TREATMENT OF NEUROGENIC BLADDER

EE 791 Lecture 10. FES April 1, EE 791 Lecture 10 1

Corporate Medical Policy

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Guidelines on Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

Neuropathic Bladder. Magda Kujawa Consultant Urologist Stockport NHS Foundation Trust 12/03/2014

Urological Care of the Paralyzed Patient*

URINARY INCONTINENCE

CASES FOR TRAINING OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPINAL CORD INJURY LOWER URINARY TRACT FUNCTION BASIC DATA SET CASE 1

Neurogenic Bladder. Spina Bifida Education Day Conference SBA of Northeastern New York Albany, New York April 14, Eric Levey, M.D.

Pelvic Floor Therapy for the Neurologic Client Carina Siracusa, PT, DPT, WCS

Neurogenic Bladder: What You Should Know. A Guide for People with Spinal Cord Injury

MP A Prospective Evaluation of the Catheter Science M3 Mini Catheter for Patients with Prostatic Obstruction. Gaines W. Hammond Jr.

Minimal invasive electrode implantation for conditional stimulation of the dorsal genital nerve in neurogenic detrusor overactivity

THE DYSFUNCTIONAL 'LAZY' BLADDER SYNDROME IN CHILDREN*

Neurogenic bladder. Neurogenic bladder is a type of dysfunction of the bladder due to neurological disorder.

Objectives. Key Outlines:

I N the past 10 years, our concepts regarding neurogenic

Neuropathic bladder and spinal dysraphism

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION

Original Policy Date

Neuromodulation and the pudendal nerve

Case Based Urology Learning Program

C ODING PAIN C LINICS. After attending this presentation, attendee will be able to: Coding Check List

Bladder Management. A guide for patients. Key points

Overactive Bladder Syndrome

Ben Herbert Alex Wojtowicz

Chapter 14 The Autonomic Nervous System Chapter Outline

Incontinence in neurological disease

Original Article. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION

Chapter 23. Micturition and Renal Insufficiency

Prolapse & Urogynaecology. Hester Mannion and Fabi Sica

Objectives. Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence URINARY INCONTINENCE: EVALUATION AND CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS

Dysfunctional voiding

Clinical Policy: Urinary Incontinence Devices and Treatments

SACRAL NEUROMODULATION: EVOLUTION OVER TIME

Neural Control of Lower Urinary Tract Function. William C. de Groat University of Pittsburgh Medical School

INTERNATIONAL SPINAL CORD INJURY DATA SETS URINARY TRACT IMAGING BASIC DATA SET - COMMENTS

Sacral Neuromodulation Beyond Pelvic Pain!!!

Medical Review Criteria Implantable Neurostimulators

NEUROPATHIC BLADDER DISORDERS

Bladder dysfunction in ALD and AMN

Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Voiding Dysfunction

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: BULKING AGENTS FOR TREATMENT OF URINARY OR FECAL INCONTINENCE. POLICY NUMBER: CATEGORY: Technology Assessment

Aalborg Universitet. Published in: Journal of Urology. DOI (link to publication from Publisher): /01.ju b

ParasymPathetic Nervous system. Done by : Zaid Al-Ghnaneem

THE vesical dysfunction which follows injury or disease of the spinal cord

Clinical Policy: Urodynamic Testing Reference Number: CP.MP.98

Urodynamic and electrophysiological investigations in neuro-urology

Sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction

InterStim CONSULTATION INFORMATION.

Re-evaluation of differential sacral rhizotomy for neurological bladder disease

Sacral Nerve Neuromodulation/Stimulation for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Urogynecology in EDS. Joan L. Blomquist, MD Greater Baltimore Medical Center August 2018

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulator (NMES) Corporate Medical Policy

Adult Urodynamics: American Urological Association (AUA)/Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) Guideline

Subject: Sacral Nerve Neuromodulation/Stimulation

New Neurostimulation and Blockade Strategy to. Enhance Bladder Voiding in Paraplegics

The sacral LION procedure for recovery of bladder/rectum/sexual functions in

Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with detrusor overactivity

Sacral Nerve Neuromodulation / Stimulation

Refractory Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

THE ACONTRACTILE BLADDER - FACT OR FICTION?

Original Policy Date

Physiology & Neurophysiology of lower U.T.

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION. POLICY NUMBER: CATEGORY: Technology Assessment

Inspire Medical Systems. Physician Billing Guide

Overactive Bladder. When to see a doctor. Normal bladder function

PERCUTANEOUS FACET JOINT DENERVATION

Management of OAB. Lynsey McHugh. Consultant Urological Surgeon. Lancashire Teaching Hospitals

GUIDELINES ON NEURO-UROLOGY

BLADDER HYPERREFLEXIA WITH resultant incontinence

Bladder Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis. by Nancy J. Holland, EdD, RN and Nancy C. Reitman, MA, RN

Corporate Medical Policy

Transcription:

MP 7.01.58 Stimulation of the Sacral Anterior Root Combined with Posterior Sacral Rhizotomy in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury Medical Policy Section Issue 12:2013 Original Policy Date 12:2013 Last Review Status/Date Reviewed with literature search/12:2013 Return to Medical Policy Index Disclaimer Our medical policies are designed for informational purposes only and are not an authorization, or an explanation of benefits, or a contract. Receipt of benefits is subject to satisfaction of all terms and conditions of the coverage. Medical technology is constantly changing, and we reserve the right to review and update our policies periodically. Description Suprasacral spinal cord injury may result in neurogenic bladders, characterized in part by frequent urinary tract infections from inadequate bladder emptying. The high bladder pressures related to large post-void residuals can lead to autonomic dysreflexia, vesicoureteral reflux, upper urinary tract dilations, hydronephrosis, and eventual renal failure. (Autonomic dysreflexia is a clinical phenomenon affecting patients with a spinal cord injury above the sympathetic outflow at T5-T6. Any noxious stimulus arising below this level may irritate reflex sympathetic activity, which may result in life-threatening hypertension.) Bladder management after spinal cord injury typically attempts to increase bladder capacity, maintain low pressure storage of urine, minimize risk of urinary tract infection by limiting post-void residual urine, and prevent incontinence. Conservative treatment of neurogenic bladder includes use of anticholinergic drugs to control reflex incontinence and autonomic hyperreflexia, and intermittent or permanent catheterization for bladder emptying. External sphincterotomy or urinary diversion is a surgical option. Electrical stimulation to improve bladder control has been investigated since 1954, with stimulation of the sacral anterior (i.e., motor) nerve roots first attempted in 1978. Sacral anterior root stimulation is intended to provide bladder evacuation by delivering electrical stimulation to intact spinal nerve roots to elicit functional contraction of the innervated muscles. (In contrast, the Interstim device, addressed in policy No. 7.01.69, is designed to modulate the neural reflexes and does not induce contraction.) Implantation of a sacral anterior root stimulator is typically performed in conjunction with a simultaneous posterior rhizotomy. The rhizotomy results in an areflexive bladder with low intravesicular pressure and high compliance. These features limit reflex incontinence and autonomic hyperreflexia. When the patient activates the implanted stimulator, the urethral sphincter and bladder contract and relax, allowing the bladder to empty on demand with low residual urine volumes. While sacral anterior root stimulation has been widely used in Europe for many years, in this country, only 1 implantable device, the Vocare Bladder System, has received approval by the

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for stimulation of the sacral anterior nerve root. The FDA-labeled indication, approved in 1999, is as follows: The Neurocontrol VOCARE Bladder System is indicated for the treatment of patients who have clinically complete spinal cord lesions with intact parasympathetic innervation of the bladder and are skeletally mature and neurologically stable, to provide urination on demand and to reduce post-void residual volumes of urine. The use of the VOCARE Bladder System consists of the following implantable external and surgical components. Implanted components consist of the implantable receiver-stimulator, which is implanted subcutaneously. The receiver-stimulator is attached to extradural electrodes that are attached to the sacral anterior nerve roots. External components consist principally of an external, battery-powered controller and transmitter. The external controller generates and delivers a sequence of electrical pulses that are emitted as electromagnetic fields from the transmitter. The transmitter is placed on the skin over the subcutaneously implanted receiver-stimulator. The surgical components include a variety of surgical tools to assist in the identification of the appropriate nerve roots for posterior rhizotomy and the optimal placement of the implanted extradural electrodes. Posterior rhizotomy requires an S1-S3 laminectomy. The extradural electrodes are implanted during the same procedure. Extensive pre- and postoperative urodynamic testing is an associated part of the overall procedure. The Vocare Bladder System received FDA approval under a Humanitarian Device Exemption. This category of FDA approval is applicable to those devices intended to treat a population of less than 4,000 individuals. A Humanitarian Device Exemption does not require clinical data validating the effectiveness of the device, but rather only data validating its safety and an assessment that the probable benefit exceeds the risks. Note: Stimulation of the sacral anterior motor nerve roots must be distinguished from stimulation of the sacral sensory nerve. Stimulation of the sacral sensory nerve, indicated as a treatment of incontinence and urinary retention in patients without spinal cord injury, is considered separately in policy No. 7.01.69. Policy Stimulation of the sacral anterior roots using an implantable device, in conjunction with a posterior rhizotomy, may be considered medically necessary for patients with a suprasacral complete spinal cord lesion and an associated neurogenic bladder. Note: This policy does not address implantable electrical stimulation of sacral nerves (not nerve roots) as a treatment of urinary incontinence or retention in patients without spinal cord injury. This procedure is addressed separately in policy No. 7.01.69

Policy Guidelines The following series of CPT codes are used to describe the various components of the overall procedure. Pre- and Postoperative Work-up *51600: Injection procedure for cystography or voiding urethrocystography *51726: Complex cystometrogram *51741: Complex uroflometry *51797: Voiding studies, intra-abdominal voiding pressure *74430: Cystography *74420 Urography, retrograde *The above procedures may be done both pre- and postoperatively 72148-72149: MRI of the lumbar spinal canal, with or without contrast, respectively 63190: Laminectomy with rhizotomy; more than two segments 63655: Laminectomy for implantation of neurostimulator electrodes 63685: Incision and subcutaneous or spinal neurostimulator pulse generator or receiver Rationale Implantable stimulation of sacral anterior nerve roots in association with posterior rhizotomy has been widely used in Europe for several decades. Case series of over 500 patients have been reported. (1) The FDA approval of the Vocare Bladder System was based on a trial of 23 patients who underwent implantation of the device in association with posterior rhizotomy and were followed up for a minimum of 3 months. (2) Comparisons were made with the device turned either on or off; thus patients served as their own controls. The principal outcome measures were improvement in bladder emptying as evidenced by the ability to urinate more than 200 ml on demand with post-void residuals less than 50 ml. Secondary endpoints include reduction in the use of urinary catheters, number and severity of episodes of urinary incontinence, reduction in incidence of urinary tract infections, and results of a user satisfaction survey. After 3 months, 90% of the patients were able to void greater than 200 ml on demand and 81% had a post-void residual less than 50 ml. A total of 73% of patients reported fewer urinary tract infections, and at 6 months, about one half of the patients were using the stimulator exclusively for micturition; no external devices, such as catheters, were needed.

The results reported in this small clinical trial are consistent with those reported in larger case series. (3) For example, Van Kerrebroeck and colleagues reported on the outcomes of 47 patients who were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. (4) Complete continence was reported in 43 of the 47 patients, and 41 of the 47 patients used only the stimulator for bladder emptying. The residual urine volume also decreased to less than 50 ml in 41 patients. The incidence of urinary tract injections also decreased. Egon and colleagues reported on a case series of 93 patients. (5) A total of 83 of the 93 patients used their implants for micturition with residual volumes less than 50 ml. 2002-3 Update A search of the literature based on the MEDLINE database for the period of 2000 though July 2002 did not identify any published articles that would prompt a change in the policy statement. The study conducted as part of the FDA approval process has now been published in the peerreviewed literature. (6) A small study of 12 patients has also suggested that use of a neuroprosthesis greatly reduces the cost of managing a neurogenic bladder. (7) References: 1. Brindley GS. The first 500 patients with sacral anterior root stimulator implants: general description. Paraplegia 1994; 32(12);795-805. 2. FDA Web site: http:\\www.fda.gov. 3. Creasey GH. Electrical stimulation of sacral roots for micturition after spinal cord injury. Urol Clin North Am 1993; 20(3):505-15. 4. Van Kerrebroeck PE, Koldewijn EL, Rosier PF et al. Results of the treatment of neurogenic bladder dysfunction in spinal cord injury by sacral posterior root rhizotomy and anterior sacral root stimulation. J Urol 1996; 155(4):1378-81. 5. Egon G, Barat M, Columbel P et al. Implantation of anterior sacral root stimulators combined with posterior sacral rhizotomy in spinal injury patients. World J Urol 1998; 16(5):342-9. 6. Creasey GH, Grill JH, Korsten M et al. An implantable neuroprosthesis for restoring bladder and bowel control to patients with spinal cord injuries: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(11):1512-9. 7. Creasey GH, Dahlberg JE. Economic consequences of an implanted neuroprosthesis for bladder and bowel management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(11):1520-5. Codes Number Description CPT See policy guidelines ICD-9 Procedure ICD-9 Diagnosis 596.54 Neurogenic bladder

HCPCS Type of Service Place of Service Inpatient Index Electrical Stimulation, Sacral Anterior Nerve Root Sacral Anterior Nerve Root Stimulation Vocare Bladder System