SEASONAL BIONOMICS OF MELON FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE COQUILLETT ON BOTTLE GOURD IN LABORATORY CONDITION

Similar documents
Bionomics of Fruit Fly, Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet) on Cucumber under Laboratory Condition

Effect of Natural and Artificial Diets on the Life History Parameters of Melon Fruit Fly Bactrocera Cucurbitae (Coquillett)

BIONOMICS OF BACTROCERA DORSALIS (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) AN IMPORTANT PEST OF MANGO (MANGIFERA INDICA) IN JAMMU (J & K) J. S. Tara and Madhvi Gupta*

Population Dynamics of Three Species of Genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in BARI, Chakwal (Punjab)

Biology of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Cucumber

FRUIT FLY OF CUCURBITS IN SEMI ARID REGION OF NORTH GUJARAT CHAUDHARY, F. K. *

BIOLOGY OF GALL FLY, Procontarina matteiana (Kieffer & Cecconi) ON MANGO *JADHAV, K. M., PATEL, R. K. AND PATEL S. A.

MANAGEMENT OF FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERACUCURBITAE (COQUILLETT) IN RIDGE GOURD THROUGH BOTANICALS AND NEWER INSECTICIDES

Demographic parameters and biotic factors of two Dacini species, Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus, on Réunion Island

Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir , INDIA 2

Curre nt Status of the Solanaceous Fruit Fly Control Project in Yonaguni Island. Abstract

Eco-friendly modules for management of fruit fly, B. cucurbitae infesting sponge gourd

whereas the fourth inhibitor was extracted and semi purified from cabbage (Brassica oleracae) in the Insect Physiology Laboratory of the Department of

Fruit Fly Surveillance in Nepal

Volume 1 Issue 2 April-June,2012 DOSE OF CUE- LURE FOR SUPPRESSION OF MELON FLY POPULATION IN PUMPKIN CHAUDHARY*, F. K. AND PATEL, G. M.

Full-text Available Online at

SEASONAL VARIATIONS OF MELON FLY, Bactrocera cucurbitae (COQUILLETT) (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) IN DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL HABITATS OF BANGLADESH

Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Genetic Sexing: All-male Sterile Fly Releases in Hawaii

Ecology and Sustainable Management of Major Bactrocera Fruit Flies in Goa, India

Mediterranean fruit fly

Efficacy of Protein Bait Sprays in Controlling Melon Fruit Fly [Bactrocera Cucurbitae (Coquillett)] in Vegetable Agro-ecosystems

Comparative Toxicity of Certain Pesticides to Peach Fruit Fly, Bactrocera zonata Saunders (Diptera: Tephritidae) under Laboratory Conditions

[fll ~ft:

ACTION PLAN. for. CUELURE ATTRACTED FRUIT FLIES including the Melon Fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)

Effect of temperature and food on the biology of Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts

Rearing Fopius arisanus (Sonan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Effect of weather parameters on incidence of insect pests of cucumber in eastern Bihar

EFFICACY OF PROTEIN BAIT SPRAYS IN CONTROLLING FRUIT FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) INFESTING ANGLED LUFFA AND BITTER GOURD IN THAILAND

Progress. Agric. 18(2) : 93-97, 2007 ISSN

THE PEST NAGEME NT GUIDE

Relationship between Population Fluctuation of Oriental Fruit Fly Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel and Abiotic Factors in Yezin, Myanmar

DETERMINATION OF FRUIT FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) INFESTATION IN GUAVA, PEACH AND BITTER GOURD ORCHARDS IN KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA.

EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON DEVELOPMENT AND REPRODUCTION OF PEACH FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA ZONATA (SAUND.)(DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)

Area-wide Integrated Management of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Pest in Vegetables Cultivation

EFFECT OF CUSTARD APPLE ON BIOLOGY OF RICE MOTH C. cephalonica

VQ612 Determination of Fruit Fly Host Status for Red Tiger, Shadow, Gemini & Baby-lee Watermelons. MD Jess, RJ Corcoran QDPI

Irradiation Quarantine Treatments for Deciduous Tree Fruits

Standardization of Glycerinisation for Leaves of Silver Oak (Grevillea robusta), Kanchan (Bauhinia purpurea) and Pipal (Ficus religiosa)

EFFICACY OF SOME BOTANICALS AS INSECTICIDES ON THE MELON FLY, BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE (COQUILLETT) (DIPTERA : TEPHRITIDAE)

Fruits are grown on 0.64 million hectares in

Developing a First Detector Network for Utah. Cooperative A g Pest Sur vey Coordinator

Cannabis Aphid (Phorodon cannabis)

The fruit flies are the classical international

BIOL 217 FIELD TRIP TO COLLECT GOLDENRODS

Scarlet-Bodied Wasp Moth, Cosmosoma myrodora (Dyar) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) 1

Genetic Control Tactic Against Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Insect to Escape Destruction of Perishable Horticulture Crops

Epidemiological studies on downy mildew of bitter gourd caused by Pseudoperonospora cubensis

Scientific Note. Solanum torvum (Solanaceae), a New Host of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii

CONTROL OF GYPSY MOTHS

Survival and development of Bactrocera oleae Gmelin (Diptera:Tephritidae) immature stages at four temperatures in the laboratory

Optional Test: Calculations of PMI using ADH

Sperm Precedence of Irradiated Mediterranean Fruit Fly Males (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Saskatoon fruitinfesting

inside the insectary were 23.5±1.2 and 25.7±0.1oC and 74.5±0.4 and

Risk Management Proposal:

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(10):

Insect Pests of Canola. Dale Whaley

REGIONAL STANDARDS FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES GUIDELINES FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF NON-HOST STATUS OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES TO TEPHRITID FRUIT FLIES

Guava Fruit Fly, Bactrocera correcta (Bezzi) (Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae) 1

Forensic Entomology. Application of the study of insects and their arthropod relatives to the legal system.

XA IRRADIATION AS A QUARANTINE TREATMENT OF CUT FLOWERS, GINGER AND TURMERIC AGAINST MITES, THRIPS AND NEMATODES

Study some biological aspects of peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae) In laboratory and field

Biochemical Resistance Traits of Bitter Gourd against Fruit Fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) Infestation

Efficacy of various edible and non-edible oils against Sitophilus oryzae L. in sorghum

Grant T. McQuate 1, Aimé H. Bokonon-Ganta 2, and Eric B. Jang 1

Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 12 Article 32

Incorporation of lyophilized leaves and pods into artificial diet to assess antibiosis component of resistance to pod borer in pigeonpea

Bio-efficacy of Clofentezine 50SC against two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch on rose cv. First Red in polyhouse

Evaluation of Suitable Nutrient Management on Dual Purpose Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Crop under New Alluvial Zone (NAZ) of West Bengal, India

Gamma Irradiation Effects on Reproductive Potential and Egg-Viability of the Housefly Musca domestica

Effect of grain protectants on biology of pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) in black gram

A New Eye Mutant, apricot, of the Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis

The melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae: A review of its biology and management

HONEY BEE BIOLOGY Apprentice Level Training Texas Master Beekeeper Program

Assessing the Application of the Jackknife and Bootstrap. Techniques to the Estimation of the Variability of the Net

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Diachasmimorpha longicaudata and D. kraussii (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), potential parasitoids of the olive fruit fly

ONGOING PROJECT REPORT YEAR 1/3 WTFRC Project # CH

Photo 2. Bactrocera facialis. Photo 3. Bactrocera xanthodes. Photo 4. Pacific fruit fly, Bactrocera xanthodes, laying eggs.

Species composition of Dacine fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae: Dacini) associated with Cucurbits in Tripura, a North Eastern state of India

The Threat of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly1 to American Agriculture and Efforts Being Made to Counter This Threat2 3

Influence of abiotic factors on two spotted spider mite population in eggplant

Field Identification Guide

Case Study: As the Worm Turns Speciation and the Apple Fly Maggot Introduction: Task: Final Product:

The Hawaii Fruit Fly Area-Wide Pest Management Program: Accomplishments and Future Directions

Review of Long-Term Containment Strategy for Exotic Fruit Flies in Torres Strait. Andrew Tomkins Chair

Observations and Results

Effect of Different Dose of NPK on Flower Phenology of Dragon Fruit

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TRAPS ON INCIDENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF CUCURBIT FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE MARUFA ISLAM

Mimosa Webworm in Honeylocust:

Kern County Vegetable Crops

Olive Fly (Bactrocera Oleae Gmelin) MANAGEMENT WITH NEW ALLOWED FORMULATIONS, SATISFYING THE OLIVE OIL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

Gypsy Moth Background Information

Population dynamics of fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species associated with mango in the Guinea Savanna Agro-Ecological zone of Ghana

MANAGEMENT. Biological. Chemical. Grazing

Evaluation of Communication Disruption Method Using Synthetic Sex Pheromone to Suppress Diamondback Moth Infestations

Scouting for Soybean Aphid

The Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Central America

Life-cycle Parameters of Aphelenchus avenae. on Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium oxysporum

Transcription:

NSave Nature to Survive 8(1&2): 157-162, 2014 SEASONAL BIONOMICS OF MELON FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE COQUILLETT ON BOTTLE GOURD IN LABORATORY CONDITION PARAMITA BHOWMIK*, LAISHRAM LAISHANA DEVI, MONILAL CHATTERJEE 1 AND DIPAK MANDAL 2 1 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur - 741252, West Bengal, INDIA, 2 Regional Plant Quarantine Station, FB Block, Sector- III, Salt Lake City - 97, Kolkata, West Bengal, INDIA e-mail: paramita.bhowmik2@gmail.com ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coq.) is an important pest of cucurbit fruits in the world (Dhillon et al., 2005). It is also the most common and destructive pest of cucurbits throughout Indo-Pakistan subcontinent (JainHu et al., 2008) and damage to about 20 cucurbitaceous and solanaceous hosts all over the Pakistan (Syed, 1971). Jha et al. (2007) observed infestation of fruit fly to the tune of 17% on the crop in the district of Malda, Murshidabad and Nadia. For cucurbits, especially bitter gourd, the melon fruit fly damage is the major limiting factor in obtaining good quality fruits and high yield (Srinivasan, 1959; Lall and Singh, 1969; Mote, 1975; Rabindranath and Pillai, 1986). Barma and Jha (2013) opinioned that B. cucurbitae, Coq. is one of the most important pests of pointed gourd. The extent of losses varies between 30 to 100%, depending on the cucurbit species and the season (Sapkota et al., 2010). Maggots feed inside the fruits. Generally, the females prefer to lay the eggs in soft tender fruit tissues by piercing them with the ovipositor. The eggs are laid into unopened flowers, and the larvae successfully develop in the taproots, stems, and leaf stalks (Weems and Heppner, 2001). Miyatake et al. (1993) reported <1% damage by pseudo-punctures by the sterile females in cucumber, sponge gourd and bitter gourd. The fruits attack in early stages fail to develop properly and drop or rot on the plant. The melon fruit fly remains active throughout the year on one or the other host. During the severe winter months, they hide and huddle together under dried leaves of bushes and trees. During the hot and dry season, the flies take shelter under humid and shady places and feed on honeydew of aphids infesting the fruit trees (Dhillon et al., 2005). Its life cycle lasts from 21 to 179 days (Narayanan and Batra, 1960). Development from egg to adult stage takes 13 days at 29ºC (Hollingsworth et al., 1997). High temperature and long period of sunshine as well as plantation activity influence the B. cucurbitae abundance (Lee et al., 1992). Bhatia and Mahto (1969) reported that the life cycle is completed in 36.3, 23.6, 11.2, and 12.5 days at 15, 20, 27.5, and 30ºC, respectively. There are 8 to 10 generations in a year (White and Elson-Harris, 1994; Weems and Heppner, 2001). Therefore, there is a basic need to identify the vulnerable stages of this devastating menace by thorough understanding of its bio-ecology which in turn helps us in determining appropriate time of action and suitable management methods to be adopted. MATERIALS AND METHODS The life cycle study was carried out during 2011 (June- July at 33.11 ± 2.35ºC and 96.31 ± 3.09 per cent RH and November-December at 27.61 ± 3.38ºC and 96.48 ± 3.74 per cent RH) and 2012 (February-March at 31.47 ± 3.39ºC and 92.68 ± 6.02 per cent RH, May-June at 35.73 ± 2.73ºC and 91.07 ± 6.59 per Present studies on seasonal bionomics of Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett on bottle gourd were carried out in the laboratory during 2011 and 2012. During 2011 and 2012, the egg incubation, total larval (maggot) and pupal periods were 1-2, 3-9 and 4-9 days in summer and rainy season and 2-3, 8-23 and 6-14 days in winter, respectively. The male and female adult longevity were 14-30 days and 15-33 days during summer and rainy season and 23-72 days and 22-76 days in winter, respectively during both the years. Results also indicated that the sex ratio of adult was found to be more or less similar during the experiment in both years i.e. 1-1.063: 1-2.096. KEY WORDS Melon fruit fly Bottle gourd Seasonal bionomics Sex ratio Received : 03.03.2014 Revised : 28.04.2014 Accepted : 26.05.2014 *Corresponding author 157

PARAMITA BHOWMIK et al., cent RH, July-August at 32.6 ± 1.84ºC and 95.83 ± 4.23 per cent RH and November-December at 26.6 ± 3.09ºC and 95.36 ± 4.57 per cent RH). Infested bottle gourd fruits were collected from the untreated fields and cut very carefully with the sharp knife at the point of injury. Then tiny whitish cluster of eggs were observed within the cut portion with the help of hand lens. The fresh cucurbit fruits then cut into cylindrical shapes and the middle portion of one side was scooped out with the help of sharp knife. The eggs of melon fruit fly were then placed on this small hole and the scooped out portion was placed over it to cover it so that eggs did not lose moisture. After that the cylindrical shaped cucurbit fruit with eggs was kept in a beaker (500mL) with mixture of 1:1 ratio of soil and vermicompost at the bottom of beaker to facilitate the pupation. The upper portion of the beaker was covered with muslin cloth to prevent the egg laying by other insects. The data was recorded every day closely to observe different stages of fruit fly. After hatching of maggots, the food was replaced as and when required until their pupation take place. When all the full grown maggots entered the soil for pupation, the rotten fruits and the muslin cloth from beaker were removed and placed it into a cage (0.4 x 3.5 m 2 ) for better movement of the adults. After emergence, the adult flies were provided with sugar solution diet (water, sugar and yeast in the ratio of 2:1:1 respectively) which was followed by Jha (2008). The tender fresh fruits of bottle gourd were provided into the cage for egg laying. After a few days female fruit flies laid egg on fresh fruits. Observation Regular observations on incubation period, maggot period, pupal period, adult longevity and sex ratio were recorded. For calculation of duration of life stages average and standard deviation were worked out from the observed data. N S N = 1 ( χi χ ) 2, N i = 1 Where {χ 1, χ 2,,χN} are the observed values of the sample items and x is the mean value of these observations, while the denominator N stands for the size of the sample. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Life cycle of melon fruit fly Different stages of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) Melon fruit fly consists of four stages of life cycle: egg, maggot, pupa and adult. The description and duration of different life stages of melon fruit fly were depicted in Table 1 and 2. Eggs The adult female punctured the rind of soft and tender fruits with its ovipositor and laid eggs within the ovipuncture. The freshly punctured fruits exuded fluid which later on dried up and appeared like brown resinous deposit. Studies on the biology of B. cucurbitae revealed that the eggs of fruit fly were slightly curved elongated cylindrical, tapering towards the ends, creamy white in colour, egg surface was sculptured with numerous longitudinal ridges and grooves. Freshly laid eggs measured from 0.75 mm to 1.5 mm in length with an average of 1.06 ± 0.25 mm and 0.1 mm to 0.3 mm in width with an average of 0.21± 0.08 mm (Table 1). This result was similar to the findings of Bannerjee et al. (2011) who observed the length of eggs is 1.0 mm to 1.5 mm. Larvae They passed through three larval instars to become adult. The 1 st instar maggots were apodus, translucent and white in colour, a little bit flattened dorso-ventrally and pointed at anterior ends. They had mouth hooks at anterior part of the body. The length of 1 st instar larvae varied from 1.1 mm to 1.92 mm with an average of 1.6 ± 0.25 mm and the width ranged between 02 mm to 0.39 mm with an average of 0.27 ± 0.05 mm as shown in Table 1. The 2 nd instar maggots were also a little bit flattened dorsoventrally and borad posteriorly but gradually tappering anteriorly and pointed at the head with mouth hooks. The length of the 2 nd instar larvae varied from 4 mm to 4.52 mm with an average of 4.23 ± 0.16 mm and the width ranged between 1.05 mm to 1.4 mm with an average of 1.22 ± 0.12 mm (Table 1). The 3 rd instar maggots were yellowish in colour due to accumulation of reserved food materials and were more opaque than the first and second instar maggots. The head structures were similar to those of the preceding instars although they became increase in size and length. The last body segment of the maggots was largest. The mature maggots, unlike the first and second instars, had the peculiar capacity of shifting itself from one place to another by a series of jumps after leaving the host prior to pupation. The length and width of 3 rd instar maggots varied from 7 mm to 11 mm with an average of 9.5± 0.9 mm and 0.67 mm to 1.33 mm with an average of 1.31 ± 0.12 mm respectively (Table 1). Pupae Pupation took place in soil. Freshly formed pupa was yellowish in colour and later turned reddish brown. Pupa was barrel shaped and anterior was narrower than posterior portion. Pupae were coarctate type and had hard wall which is called puparium. There were eleven distinct segments and the last segment was somewhat more prominent. The length and width of pupae varied from 4.25 mm to 6.1 mm (average 5.22 ± 0.52 mm) and 1.9 mm to 2.5 mm (average 2.1 ± 0.12 mm) respectively as shown in Table 1. The more or less similar, findings are observed by Banerjee et al. (2011) who reported that pupae of melon fruit fly are 5 to 8 mm long and brown in colour. Adults The adult flies were reddish brown with lemon yellow, curved, vertical marking on the thorax and shading on the outer margin of the wings. Males were smaller in size than the females. The female was distinguishable easily by the presence of a tapering abdomen tending in a sharp ovipositor which is the formed by the 7 th to 11 th abdominal segments. Adults are 4 to 5 mm long having a wing expanse of 11 to 13 mm and 14 to 16 mm in males and females respectively reported by Banerjee et al. (2011). 158

SEASONAL BIONOMICS OF MELON FRUIT FLY, The male length varied from 5.5 mm to 9 mm with an average of 7.28± 0.9 mm and width varied from 7 mm to 14 mm with an average of 9.97± 1.62 mm. The length of female melon fruit fly ranged between 7 mm to 10 mm with an average of 8.83 ±1.02 mm and width varied from 8 mm to 16 mm with an average of 10.75 ± 1.88 mm (Table 1). Life cycle of Bactrocera cucurbitae Incubation period Studies on the life cycle of cucurbit fruit fly, B. cucurbitae revealed that the eggs were elliptical and pure white. They were almost flat on the ventral surface and more convex on the dorsal. The incubation period was 1.2 ± 0.42 days in June-July at average temperature of 33.11 ± 2.35ºC and relative humidity 96.31 ± 3.09 per cent and 1.7 ± 0.82 days in November-December at average temperature of 27.61 ± 3.38ºC and relative humidity 96.48 ± 3.74 per cent during 2011. But in 2012, the incubation period was 1.5 ± 0.71 days, 1.2± 0.42 days, 1.5 ± 0.53 days and 1.6 ± 0.52 days in February-March, May-June, July-August and November- December at an average temperature of 31.47 ± 3.39ºC, 35.73 ± 2.73ºC, 32.6 ± 1.84ºC and 26.6 ± 3.09ºC and relative humidity 92.68 ± 6.02, 91.07 ± 6.59, 95.83 ± 4.23 and 95.36 ± 4.57 per cent, respectively (Table 2). The results on incubation periods of the present study was in the close agreement with those of Atwal (1986) who reported that incubation lasts 2 days. Similarly, Khan et al. (1993) reported more or less the same, incubation period as reported in the present study, whereas, Shivarkar and Dumbre (1985a) find incubation period of B. cucurbitae 1.20 days on water melon. The present finding was in conformity with Koul and Bhagat (1994) who reported the hatching period from 1.00 to 5.10 days on bitter gourd. Jha (2008) reported that egg incubation period varies from 2 to 9 days on bitter gourd. The incubation period is 2.29±0.18 days on musk melon and Indian squash in the laboratory and field condition (Lanjar et al., 2013). Larval period On hatching, the larvae fed on cut pieces of the fresh cucurbit fruits and they passed through three larval instars to become an adult. The duration of 1 st instar was 1.3 ± 0.48 days in June-July and 2.3 ± 0.48 days in November-December at average temperature of 33.11 ± 2.35ºC and 27.61 ± 3.38ºC and relative humidity 96.31 ± 3.09 and 96.48 ± 3.74 per cent, respectively during 2011. But in 2012, the duration was found to be 1.5 ± 0.53, 1.2 ± 0.42, 1.1 ± 0.32 and 1.9 ± 0.74 days in February-March, May-June, July-August and November-December at an average temperature of 31.47 ± 3.39ºC, 35.73 ± 2.73ºC, 32.6 ± 1.84ºC and 26.6 ± 3.09ºC and relative humidity 92.68 ± 6.02, 91.07 ± 6.59, 95.83 ± 4.23 and 95.36 ± 4.57 per cent, respectively. The 2 nd instar maggots were broad tapering at both ends and the duration were 2.3 ± 0.48 and 4.7 ± 0.82 days in June-July and November-December, respectively in 2011 and 3.4 ± 0.52, 2.3 ± 0.48, 1.4 ± 0.52 and 3.5 ± 0.53 days in February- March, May-June, July-August and November-December in 2012, respectively. The duration of 3 rd instars were 3.4 ± 0.52 and 10.9 ± 2.28 days in June-July and November- December during 2011. The duration was 8.9 ± 1.66, 2.6 ± 0.52, 1.6 ± 0.52 and 5.3 ± 1.16 days in February-March, May-June, July-August and November-December in 2012, respectively. Total maggot period was 7 ± 1.05 and 17.8 ± 3.26 days in respective months in 2011 and 13.4 ± 2.37, 6.2 ± 1.03, 4 ± 1.05and 11.2 ± 2.04 days during respective months during 2012 (Table 2). The result was also in conformity with Renjhan (1949), Narayanan and Batra (1960) and Hollingsworth et al. (1997) who reported that the larval period to last from 3 to 21 days depending on temperature and the host. On different cucurbit species, the larval period varies from 3 to 6 days (Chawla, 1966; Chelliah, 1970; Doharey, 1983; Shivarkar and Dumbre, 1985; Koul and Bhagat, 1994; Gupta and Verma, 1995). Jha et al. (2008) reported that the larval period varies from 5 to 7 days in July- August and 14 to 20 days in August-October. Duration of I instar is 2 days, II instar 1-2 days (average 1.7 days), III instar 2-3 days (average 2.6 days) and total larval period 6-7 days (average 6.3 days) at 28-30ºC and 75-85% relative humidity (Bannerjee et al., 2011). Pupal period The duration of pupal period was 5 ± 1.41 and 13.3 ± 0.48 days in June-July and November-December during 2011 at an average temperature of 33.11 ± 2.35ºC and 27.61 ± 3.38ºC and relative humidity 96.31 ± 3.09 and 96.48 ± 3.74 per cent, respectively. During 2012, it was 9.9 ± 0.99, 7 ± 1.05, 5.3 ± 0.48 and 10.2 ± 2.1 days in February-March, May- June, July-August and November-December in 2012, respectively at average temperature of 31.47 ± 3.39ºC, 35.73 ± 2.73ºC, 32.6 ± 1.84ºC and 26.6 ± 3.09ºC and relative humidity 92.68 ± 6.02, 91.07 ± 6.59, 95.83 ± 4.23 and 95.36 ± 4.57 per cent, respectively (Table 2). Doharey (1983) also observed that the pupal period lasts for 7 days on bitter Table 1: Measurement of different life stages of Bactrocera cucurbitae Stage Length (mm) Breadth (mm) Min. Max. Av. ± SD Min. Max. Av. ± SD Egg 0.75 1.5 1.06 ± 0.25 0.1 0.3 0.21± 0.08 Maggot I instar 1.1 1.92 1.6 ± 0.25 0.2 0.39 0.27 ± 0.05 II instar 4 4.52 4.23 ± 0.16 1.05 1.4 1.22 ± 0.12 III instar 7 11 9.5± 0.9 0.67 1.33 1.31 ± 0.12 Pupa 4.25 6.1 5.22 ± 0.52 1.9 2.5 2.1 ± 0.12 Adult Male 5.5 9 7.28± 0.9 7 14 9.97± 1.62 Female 7 10 8.83 ±1.02 8 16 10.75 ± 1.88 Data based on 30 observations. Figures in parenthesis are ranges. 159

PARAMITA BHOWMIK et al., Table 2: Duration of various stages in life cycle and sex ratio of Bactrocera cucurbitae during different period of 2011 and 2012 Stages of B. cucurbitae 2011 2012 June-July Nov.-Dec. Feb.-March May-June July-Aug Nov.-Dec Incubation period (days) 1-2 (1.2 ± 0.42) 2-3 (1.7 ± 0.82) 2-3 (1.5 ± 0.71) 1-2 (1.2± 0.42) 1-2 (1.5 ± 0.53) 1-2 (1.6 ± 0.52) Maggot period (days) I instar 1-2(1.3 ± 0.48) 2-3(2.3 ± 0.48) 1-2(1.5 ± 0.53) 1-2(1.2 ± 0.42) 1-2(1.1 ± 0.32) 1-3(1.9 ± 0.74) II instar 2-3(2.3 ± 0.48) 4-6(4.7 ± 0.82) 3-4(3.4 ± 0.52) 2-3(2.3 ± 0.48) 1-2(1.4 ± 0.52) 3-4(3.5 ± 0.53) III instar 3-4(3.4 ± 0.52) 8-14(10.9 ± 2.28) 6-11(8.9 ± 1.66) 2-3(2.6 ± 0.52) 1-2(1.6 ± 0.52) 4-7(5.3 ± 1.16) Total maggot period 6-9(7 ± 1.05) 14-23(17.8 ± 3.26) 10-17(13.4 ± 2.37) 5-8(6.2 ± 1.03) 3-6(4 ± 1.05) 8-14(11.2 ± 2.04) Pupal period (days) 4-8(5 ± 1.41) 13-14(13.3 ± 0.48) 8-11(9.9 ± 0.99) 6-9(7 ± 1.05) 5-6(5.3 ± 0.48) 6-13(10.2 ± 2.1) Adult period (days) Male 5-8(6 ± 1.05) 9-32(21.2 ± 7.8) 6-15(11.5 ± 2.64) 7-11(8.2 ± 1.4) 5-9(6.6 ± 1.43) 8-28(20.8 ± 5.87) Female 9-12(9.8 ± 1.03) 8-36(23.2 ± 9.65) 15-18(16.2 ± 1.23) 10-14 (11.5 ± 1.51) 6-12(8.3 ± 2) 7-30(21.9 ± 7.80) Total life period (days) Male 16-27(20 ± 3.4) 38-72(56.9 ± 11.12) 26-46(36.5 ± 7.12) 19-30(24.6 ± 3.6) 14-23(18.8 ± 2.78) 23-57(42.5 ± 12.2) Female 20-31(25.2 ± 3.82) 37-76 (54.1 ± 13.65) 35-49(41.2 ± 4.57) 22-33(26.7 ± 3.4) 15-26(19.6 ± 3.63) 22-59(41.4 ± 10.05) Male: Female ratio 1.063: 1 1: 1.03 1: 2.096 1.063: 1 1: 1 1: 1.09 Temperature ( C) 33.11 ± 2.35 (26.5-37) 27.61 ± 3.38 (20-33.4) 31.47 ± 3.39 (24-38) 35.73 ± 2.73 (25.2-41) 32.6 ± 1.84(29-38) 26.6 ± 3.09(17.2-31.2) Relative humidity (%) 96.31 ± 3.09 (86-100) 96.48 ± 3.74 (76-100) 92.68 ± 6.02 (66-98) 91.07 ± 6.59 (63-100) 95.83 ± 4.23(83-100) 95.36 ± 4.57(78-100) Data based on 10 observations. Figures in parenthesis are range gourd and 7.2 days on pumpkin and squash gourd at 27 ± 1ºC. In general, the pupal period lasts for 6 to 9 days during the rainy season and 15 days during the winter (Narayanan and Batra, 1960). Depending on temperature and the host, the pupal period might have varied from 7 to 13 days (Hollingsworth et al., 1997) which was drawn a very close agreement with our present observations. On different hosts, the pupal period lasts for 7.7 to 9.4 days on bitter gourd, cucumber and sponge gourd (Gupta and Verma, 1995). It is 6 to 11 days in July-August and 15 to 25 days in August-October on bitter gourd reported by Jha (2008). Koul and Bhagat (1994), Khan et al. (1993) reported that the pupal period is found to be 6.5 to 21.8 days on bottle gourd. Banerjee et al. (2011) reported that pupal period varies subsequently from 7 to 11 days at 29-31ºC temperature and 81-85% relative humidity. Adult period The longevity of adult male was 6 ± 1.05 and 21.2 ± 7.8 days during June-July and November-December, respectively in 2011. It was 11.5 ± 2.64, 8.2 ± 1.4, 6.6 ± 1.43 and 20.8 ± 5.87 days in February-March, May-June, July-August and November-December in 2012, respectively. The longevity of adult female were 9.8 ± 1.03 and 23.2 ± 9.65 days during June-July and November-December in 2011 and 16.2 ± 1.23, 11.5 ± 1.51, 8.3 ± 2 and 21.9 ± 7.80 days during February- March, May-June, July-August and November-December in 2012, respectively. Female flies survived more days than male flies. Total life span of male was 20 ± 3.4 and 56.9 ± 11.12 days during June-July and November-December in 2011 and 36.5 ± 7.12, 24.6 ± 3.6, 18.8 ± 2.78 and 42.5 ± 12.2 days during February-March, May-June, July-August and November- December in 2012, respectively. The total life period of adult female was found to be 25.2 ± 3.82 and 54.1 ± 13.65 days during June-July and November-December in 2011 and 41.2 ± 4.57, 26.7 ± 3.4, 19.6 ± 3.63 and 41.4 ± 10.05 days during February-March, May-June, July-August and November- December in 2012, respectively (Table 2). It was observed that during winter months (Nov-Dec) the development duration of immature stage was much prolonged. Female flies were lived long than the male flies. The results were more or less conformity with the findings of Lall and Singh (1959) who reported the life cycle duration from 12.50 to 13.20 days during June-July. The total developmental period of this fruit fly on bitter gourd is found to be 15.60 days in July-August and 42.10 days in August- October (Jha, 2008). Gupta and Verma (1992) reported that adult longevity is 34.30 days in case of female and 29 days in male. Koul and Bhagat (1994) observed that female live for 21.70 to 32.70 days and male live for 15 to 28.50 days on bitter gourd. Adult longevity varies from 49.70 days in July- August and 28.40 days in August-October on bitter gourd (Jha, 2008). Manzar and Srivastava (2009) who revealed that longevity of male is 12.74+or-2.83 days and that of female is 15.03+or-3.14 days in June and July. The duration of adult longevity in our observation was similar with the result observed by Koul and Bhagat (1994) and Renjhan (1949), who reported the duration of larval and pupal period lengthen in winter and shorten in summer period. The results of incubation, larval and pupal periods were in closely agreement with that of Vargas et al. (1989) reported that the duration of 160

SEASONAL BIONOMICS OF MELON FRUIT FLY, immature stages ranges from 12.9 to 40 days and the female longevity ranges from 35.6 to 136.5 and male ranges from 37.5-220.0 days. Sex ratio The sex ratio (Male: Female) of adult was found to be 1.063: 1 and 1: 1.03 during June-July and November-December in 2011. But in 2012, the ratio was found to be 1: 2.096, 1.063: 1, 1: 1 and 1: 1.09 during February-March, May-June, July- August and November-December in 2012, respectively. Banerjee et al. (2011) postulated that the sex ratio of adult is 1.2: 1 at 29-30ºC and relative humidity from 78 to 81% which is more or less similar with the present investigation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We thank Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata for identification of fruit fly species; Mr. Raghunath Kaja of Pheromone Chemicals, Hyderabad for supplying cue-lure blocks time to time and Dr. Shambhu Pal and Mrs. Soma Chakrobarty of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya for technical advice. Financial support from Inspire Fellowship, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India is gratefully acknowledged and further we are very much grateful to the farmers of the above districts for their support during the course of investigation. REFERENCES Atwal, S. N. 1986. Agriculture Pests of India and South East Asia. Kalyani publication New Delhi India. p. 529. Banerjee, M., Jha, S. and Konar, A. 2011. Bionomics of melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coq.) on bitter gourd. Geobios. 38(4): 309-311. Barma, P. and Jha, S. 2013. Insect and non-insect pests infesting pointed gourd (Trichosanthes dioica roxb.) in West Bengal. The Bioscan. 8(2): 537-543. Bhatia, S. K. and Mahto, Y. 1969. Influence of temperature on the speed of development of melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). Indian J. Agril. Sci. 40: 821-828. Chawla, S. S. 1966. Some critical observations on the biology of melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). Res. Bull. Punjab University (Sci.). 17: 105-109. Chelliah, S. 1970. Host influence on the development of melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett. Indian J. Entomol. 32: 381-383. Dhillon, M. K., Singh, R., Naresh, J. S. and Sharma, H. C. 2005. The melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae: A review of its biology and management. J. Insect Sci. 5: 40. Doharey, K. L. 1983. Bionomics of fruit flies (Dacus spp.) on some fruits. Indian J. Entomol. 45: 406-413. Gupta, D. and Verma, A. K. 1992. Population fluctuations of the maggots of fruit flies, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) and B. tau (Walker) infesting cucurbitaceous crops. Adv. Plant Sci. 5(2): 518-523. Gupta, B. L. and Verma, A. K. 1995. Host specific demographic studies of the melon fruit fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Insect Sci. 89(1): 87-89. Hollingsworth, R., Vagalo, M. and Tsatsia, F. 1997. Biology of melon fly, with special reference to the Solomon Islands. In: Allwood AJ and Drew RAI editors. Management of fruit flies in the Pacific. Proc. Australian Country Industrial Agril. Res. 76: 140-144. JainHu, Zhang, J. L., Francesco-nardi and Zhang, R. J. 2008. Publication generation structure of melon fruitfly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) from China and South Asia. Genetica. 134(3): 319-324. Jha, S., Khan, M. R., Sahoo, S. and Das, S. 2007. Infestation of fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) on pointed gourd (Trichosanthes dioica). Sashya Surakhya. 4: 12-13. Jha, S. 2008. Bio-ecology and management of fruit fly and Epilachna beetle in bitter gourd. SAARC J. Agri. 6(1): 11-27. Khan, L., Haq, M., Inayatullah, C. and Mohsan, A. 1993. Biology and behaviour of melon fruitfly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillet. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pakistan J. Zool. 25(3): 203-208. Koul, V. K. and Bhagat, K. C. 1994. Biology of melon fruit fly Bactrocera (Dacus) cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae) on bottle gourd. Pest Manag. Econ. Zool. 2(2): 123-125. Lall, B. S. and Singh, B. N. 1969. Studies on the biology and control of melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae (Coq.) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Labdev J. Sci. Tech. 7B: 148-153. Lall, B. S. and Sinha, S. N. 1959. On the biology of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae (Coq.) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Sci. and Culture. 25: 159-161. Lanjar, A. G., Sahito, H. A., Talpur, M. A. and Channa, M. S. 2013. Biology and Population of Melon Fruit fly on Musk Melon and Indian Squash. Int. J. Farming and Allied Sci. 2: 42-47. Lee, L. W. Y., Hwang, Y. B., Cheng, C. C. and Chang, J. C. 1992. Population fluctuation of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae, in northeastern Taiwan. Chinese J. Entomol. 12: 285-292. Manzar, A. and Srivastava, J. P. 2009. Biology of melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coq.) on bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Trends in Biosciences. 2(1): 42-43. Miyatake, T., Irabu, T. and Higa, R. 1993. Oviposition punctures in cucurbit fruits and their economic damage caused by the sterile female melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett. Proc. of the Association of Plant Prot Kyushu. 39: 102-105. Mote, U. N. 1975. Control of fruit fly (Dacus cucurbitae) on bitter gourd and cucumber. Pesticides. 9: 36-37. Narayanan, E. S. and Batra, H. N. 1960. Fruit Flies and Their Control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India. pp. 1-68 Rabindranath, K. and Pillai, K. S. 1986. Control of fruit fly of bitter gourd using synthetic pyrethroids. Entomon. 11: 269-272. Renjhan, P. I. 1949. On the morphology of the immature stages of Dacus cucurbitae Coq., (the melon fruit fly) with notes on biology. Indian J. Entomol. 11: 83-100. Sapkota, R., Dahal, K. C. and Thapa, R. B. 2010. Damage assessment and management of cucurbit fruit fly in spring-summer squash. J. Entomol. Nematol. 2(1): 7-12. Shivarkar, D. T. and Dumbre, R. B. 1985. Bionomics and chemical control of melon fly. J. Maharashtra Agril. Univ. 10(3): 298-300. Shivarkar, V. K. and Dumbre, R. 1985a. Study on biology of fruit fly on watermelon at laboratory condition. Environ. Entomol. 2(15): 20-28. Srinivasan, P. M. 1959. Guard your bitter gourd against the fruit fly. Indian Farming. 9: 8. Syed, R. A. 1971. Studies on tephritids and their natural enemies in West Pakistan Dacus (Strumeta) cucurbitae Coq. Tech. Bull. CWIBC. 14: 63-75. Vargas, R. I., Stark, J. D. and Nishida, T. 1989. Abundance, distribution and dispersion indices of the oriental fruit fly and melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Kauai, Hawaiian Islands. J. Econ. Entomol. 82(6): 1609-1615. Weems, H. V. and Heppner, J. B. 2001. Melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett (Insecta: Diptera : Tephritidae) Florida 161

PARAMITA BHOWMIK et al., Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division Plant Industry and TR Fasulo, University of Florida. University Florida Publication EENY. p. 199. White, I. M. and Elson-Harris, M. M. 1994. Fruit Flies of Economic Significance: Their Identification and Bionomics. Common wealth Agri. Bureau International, Oxon, UK. pp. 1-601. 162