Bionomics of Fruit Fly, Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet) on Cucumber under Laboratory Condition

Similar documents
Demographic parameters and biotic factors of two Dacini species, Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus, on Réunion Island

BIOLOGY OF GALL FLY, Procontarina matteiana (Kieffer & Cecconi) ON MANGO *JADHAV, K. M., PATEL, R. K. AND PATEL S. A.

Biology of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Cucumber

SEASONAL BIONOMICS OF MELON FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE COQUILLETT ON BOTTLE GOURD IN LABORATORY CONDITION

FRUIT FLY OF CUCURBITS IN SEMI ARID REGION OF NORTH GUJARAT CHAUDHARY, F. K. *

BIONOMICS OF BACTROCERA DORSALIS (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) AN IMPORTANT PEST OF MANGO (MANGIFERA INDICA) IN JAMMU (J & K) J. S. Tara and Madhvi Gupta*

whereas the fourth inhibitor was extracted and semi purified from cabbage (Brassica oleracae) in the Insect Physiology Laboratory of the Department of

Growth Rate Studies of Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella in Different Geographical Regions of North India

MANAGEMENT OF FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERACUCURBITAE (COQUILLETT) IN RIDGE GOURD THROUGH BOTANICALS AND NEWER INSECTICIDES

Optional Test: Calculations of PMI using ADH

Estimation of Genetic Divergence for Growth, Earliness and Yield Parameters in Cucumber (Cucumis Sativus L.)

Incorporation of lyophilized leaves and pods into artificial diet to assess antibiosis component of resistance to pod borer in pigeonpea

Eco-friendly modules for management of fruit fly, B. cucurbitae infesting sponge gourd

Incidence of Podfly, Melanagromyza obtusa (MALLOCH) and its Influence on Weight Loss in Different Pigeonpea Genotypes

licarsisalis, and its Adaptability for Laboratory Tests1

JKMU. Environmental Factors Influencing the Growth of Lucilia sericata Larvae Used for Maggot Therapy under Laboratory Condition ARTICLE INFO

Population Dynamics of Three Species of Genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in BARI, Chakwal (Punjab)

Volume 1 Issue 2 April-June,2012 DOSE OF CUE- LURE FOR SUPPRESSION OF MELON FLY POPULATION IN PUMPKIN CHAUDHARY*, F. K. AND PATEL, G. M.

ACTION PLAN. for. CUELURE ATTRACTED FRUIT FLIES including the Melon Fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)

Ecology and Sustainable Management of Major Bactrocera Fruit Flies in Goa, India

Mediterranean fruit fly

ORIENTATIONAL EFFECT OF AQUEOUS LEAF EXTRACT OF CITRUS AURANTIFOLIA ON HOUSEFLY, MUSCA DOMESTICA (DIPTERA:MUSCIDAE)

REGIONAL STANDARDS FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES GUIDELINES FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF NON-HOST STATUS OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES TO TEPHRITID FRUIT FLIES

Comparative Toxicity of Certain Pesticides to Peach Fruit Fly, Bactrocera zonata Saunders (Diptera: Tephritidae) under Laboratory Conditions

[fll ~ft:

Forensic Entomology. Application of the study of insects and their arthropod relatives to the legal system.

Effect of Natural and Artificial Diets on the Life History Parameters of Melon Fruit Fly Bactrocera Cucurbitae (Coquillett)

VQ612 Determination of Fruit Fly Host Status for Red Tiger, Shadow, Gemini & Baby-lee Watermelons. MD Jess, RJ Corcoran QDPI

Saskatoon fruitinfesting

The Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Central America

Progress. Agric. 18(2) : 93-97, 2007 ISSN

Variability in Grain Physico-Chemical Composition in Different Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Genotypes

Observations and Results

Effect of temperature and food on the biology of Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts

Seasonal Incidence and Management of Red Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. Infesting Rose

THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE

EFFECT OF CUSTARD APPLE ON BIOLOGY OF RICE MOTH C. cephalonica

CONTROL OF THE WAX MOTH GALLERIA MELLONELLA L. (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) BY THE MALE STERILE TECHNIQUE (MST)

DDT poisoning in the pomace fly, Drosophila melanog aster Meigen. One experiment was on the development of several strains of flies under

Management of Alternaria Leaf Blight of Bottle Gourd in Western Rajasthan, India

Some biological characteristics of the Batrachedra amydraula

AN ANALYSIS OF A CIRCADIAN RHYTHM OF OVIPOSITION IN ONCOPELTUS FASCIATUS

Efficacy of Protein Bait Sprays in Controlling Melon Fruit Fly [Bactrocera Cucurbitae (Coquillett)] in Vegetable Agro-ecosystems

Combining Ability Studies in Bitter Gourd (Momordica charantia L.) for Quantitative Characters

Heterosis Studies for Earliness and Yield Related Traits in Ridge Gourd [Luffa Acutangula (L.) Roxb.]

Lab 7 Heredity. Is there a fly in here?

Non-Preference / Antixenosis and Antibiosis Mechanism Contributing to BPH Resistance in Certain Identified Elite Rice Genotypes

Notes on the Biology of the Chinese Rose Beetle,

CONTROL OF GYPSY MOTHS

Genetic Analysis for Earliness and Yield Components using Gynoecious and Monoecious Lines in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

National Institute of Plant health management, Hyderabad

Some Common Vegetable Insects. Whitney Cranshaw Colorado State University

On the road to a mosquito SIT programme: Mass rearing tools and quality control

Study some biological aspects of peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae) In laboratory and field

Diachasmimorpha longicaudata and D. kraussii (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), potential parasitoids of the olive fruit fly

and productivity of Tribolium castaneum on resistant starches

Fruits are grown on 0.64 million hectares in

Biology 164 Laboratory

Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Genetic Sexing: All-male Sterile Fly Releases in Hawaii

Biology of brinjal shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee) on brinjal crop under laboratory conditions

Biochemical Resistance Traits of Bitter Gourd against Fruit Fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) Infestation

Case Study: As the Worm Turns Speciation and the Apple Fly Maggot Introduction: Task: Final Product:

EFFICACY OF PROTEIN BAIT SPRAYS IN CONTROLLING FRUIT FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) INFESTING ANGLED LUFFA AND BITTER GOURD IN THAILAND

Curre nt Status of the Solanaceous Fruit Fly Control Project in Yonaguni Island. Abstract

Application of synthetic sex pheromone for management of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, in cabbage

IJIEInt. J. Indust. Entomol. 29(1) (2014)

Susceptibility of Three Local Sorghum Varieties to Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky [Coleoptera: Curculionidae]

INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE MONITORING IN LEPIDOPTERAN COTTON PESTS

5.24 METHOXYFENOZIDE (209)

Survey for the Incidence of Root Rot/Wilt of Fenugreek in Northern Karnataka, India

A longevity comparison in forensically important male flies (Fabricius) (Diptera:Calliphoridae)

Area-wide Integrated Management of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Pest in Vegetables Cultivation

Survival and development of Bactrocera oleae Gmelin (Diptera:Tephritidae) immature stages at four temperatures in the laboratory

Mortality and Development Effects of Transgenic Cotton on Pink Bollworm Larvae

On Maggots and Murders: Forensic Entomology

THE INFLUENCE OF LIGHT ON GENE FREQUENCY CHANGES IN LABORATORY POPULATIONS OF EBONY AND NON-EBONY DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER M. E.

READING ASSIGNMENT GENETIC ANALYSIS OF DROSOPHILA POPULATIONS I. HOW DO MITOSIS AND MEIOSIS COMPARE?

Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir , INDIA 2

Discover the microscopic world

THE IMPACT OF NITROGEN AND SILICON NUTRITION ON THE RESISTANCE OF SUGARCANE VARIETIES TO ELDANA SACCHARINA (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE)

THE PEST NAGEME NT GUIDE

Increased Coprophagic Activity of the Beetle, Tenebrio molitor, on Feces Containing Eggs of the Tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta

Insect Reproduction and Development

Factors governing susceptibility and resistance of certain rice varieties to the brown planthopper

Influence of Different Planting Material and Major Nutrient Application on Yield Attributes of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.)

EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON DEVELOPMENT AND REPRODUCTION OF PEACH FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA ZONATA (SAUND.)(DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)

MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF CABBAGE MAGGOT, DELIA RADICUM, IN CAULIFLOWER, III. Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

MANAGEMENT. Biological. Chemical. Grazing

How to collect raw honeybee pollen from the hive

Teacher Workbooks. Language Arts Series Internet Reading Comprehension Pumpkins Theme, Vol. 1

GB/T Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB/T NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE

[Attachment] Survey guidelines for major fruit flies

Erythritol ingestion impairs adult reproduction and causes larval mortality in Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

MATERIALS AND METHOD

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016,

COLONIZATION OF MANSONIA DIVES SCHINER IN A FIELD INSECTARY

Evaluation of Suitable Nutrient Management on Dual Purpose Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Crop under New Alluvial Zone (NAZ) of West Bengal, India

GED Preparation Lesson Plan. Module: Science. Lesson Title: Forming a Conclusion. Standards: GED Preparation (Adult General Education)

Insect growth regulators in pest management programs. Frank Arthur USDA-ARS-GMPRC Manhattan, KS 66502

BIOL 208: Principles of Ecology and Evolution Lab Week 5, 6, &7. Bioenergetics of Caterpillars

Transcription:

International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 7 Number 03 (2018) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.297 Bionomics of Fruit Fly, Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet) on Cucumber under Laboratory Condition T.K. Balas *, D.M. Jethva, M.A. Karkar and K.M. Parekh Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-362 001, Gujarat, India *Corresponding author A B S T R A C T K e y w o r d s Cucumber, Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet), bionomics Article Info Accepted: 20 February 2018 Available Online: 10 March 2018 Investigations were carried out on Bionomics of fruit fly, Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet) on cucumber under laboratory condition at Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during kharif- 2015 on cucumber variety dharwad green. Observations on various life stages were made at a 17.7 0 C to 33.4 0 C temperature (Av. 26.87 0C ± 5.66) and 57.8 to 89.7 per cent relative humidity (Av. 81.54 ± 6.67 % RH). The eggs were laid in the fruit tissues. The average incubation period was found to be 19.6 ± 4.72 hours. The average length and width of egg 1.12 ± 0.07 mm and 0.28 ± 0.03 mm, respectively. The maggot passed through three distinct instars and average duration of each instar was 0.81 ± 0.14, 1.60 ± 0.40 and 2.61 ± 0.29 days, respectively. The total maggot period was on an average 5.02 ± 0.83 days. The average length and width of first instar maggot was 1.52 ± 0.20 mm and 0.31 ± 0.05 mm. The average length and width of second instar maggot was 6.26 ± 0.78 mm and 1.23 ± 0.06 mm. The average length and width of third instar maggot was 9.56 ± 0.66 mm and 2.19 ± 0.22 mm. The prepupal and pupal period had an average of 0.77 ± 0.42 and 8.55 ± 0.31 days, respectively. The total pupal period was an average of 9.32 ± 0.73 days. The average length and width of prepupa was 5.68 ± 0.11 mm and 2.57 ± 0.05 mm and pupal length and width was 5.68 ± 0.11 mm and 2.57 ± 0.05mm, respectively. The male and female fruit fly lived for an average of 27.7 ± 1.42 days and 34.12 ± 1.50 days, respectively. The average length and width of the male fruit fly 8.18 ± 1.70 mm and 11.16 ± 5.70 mm whereas the female fruit fly measured 9.34 ± 1.90 mm and 15.43 ± 3.24 mm, respectively. The pre-oviposition and oviposition periods was varied an average of 12.56 ± 1.62 and 21.44 ± 4.89 days, respectively. Fecundity of female of B. cucurbitae was an average of 74.84 ± 11.69 at 16.8ºC to 32.6ºC temperature (Av. 27.62 ± 4.60ºC) and 60.6 to 90.5 per cent relative humidity (Av. 80.18 ± 5.85 % RH). Sex ratio of male and female B. cucurbitae at 16.8ºC to 32.6ºC temperature (Av. 27.62 ºC ± 4.60ºC) and relative humidity 60.6 to 90.5 per cent (Av. 80.18 ± 5.85 % RH) was 1: 1.12. The entire life span of male was an average of 21.92 ± 5.83 days and that of female was an average of 25.28 ± 5.96 days. Thus, the life span of male was shorter than female. 2567

Introduction Cucumber, Cucumis sativus (Linnaeus) is one of the oldest vegetable amongst the cultivated vegetable crops belonging to the family cucurbitaceae and has been in cultivation since 3000 to 4000 years. It is originated in India from where it spread to Asia, Africa and Europe. It is one of the most popularly grown during kharif, rabi and summer seasons. The immature fruits of cucumber are used as salad and for pickling. It also consumed as raw and used as astringent and antipyretic (Thamburaj and Singh, 2003). The area, production and productivity of cucumber in country are 25 lakh hectares, 106 lakh tonnes and 6000 kg/ha, respectively during 2011 (Vanitha et al., 2013). The cucumber is produced in the states of India including Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and hilly parts of North India. The Andhra Pradesh ranks first among all the major cucumber growing states (Bose et al., 2002). Fruit fly, B. cucurbitae is one of the important insect pests of cucurbit vegetables throughout the India. It has been found to cause about 30 to 100 per cent yield loss. Cucurbitaceous fruits are severely damaged either partially or totally rendering them unfit for human consumption by this pest (Pareek and Kavadia, 1974). Basic studies on the bionomics of fruit fly include the development of immature stages, i.e., eggs, maggots and pupae as well as the life of the adults under the influences exercised by the environmental conditions and genetic factors, which govern the basic lines of behaviour and ecological factors, which may produce different type of reaction in a population having the same genetic characteristics. So, an experiment was carried out at Department of Entomology, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during the year 2015. Materials and Methods The experiment was conducted at Department of Entomolgy, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, during kharif season of the year 2015. Rearing technique To initiate the culture of B. cucurbitae in the laboratory, infested fruits (with maggot inside) of cucumber grown in the Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture, JAU, Junagdh were collected and kept in 20 20 8 cm plastic trays on a 5 cm-thick layer of sieved moist sand to facilitate pupation. After every 3-4 days, sand was sieved and newly formed pupae were collected. The pupae were kept in 10 cm diameter petri dishes (25 pupae/petri dish) lined with moist filter paper. The newly emerged adult flies were collected and placed inside the rearing cages (75 30 30 cm). Each rearing cage had wire mesh on 5 sides and a wooden door at one side. The male and female flies were identified by visual examination under microscope. In male the abdomen was blunt, ovipositor became absent. They were also smaller in size than that of the females. A honey solution (10% W/V) was provided inside the cage for adult feeding. This honey solution was kept in a 10 ml beaker and a thumb sized water-soaked cotton swab was laid in such a way that half of it was immersed in honey solution and remaining half stayed above rim of the beaker to keep the solution in reach of adult fruit flies. Slices of cucumber were kept inside each breeding cage for oviposition. These slices were replaced by fresh ones daily to avoid decay. Entire fruit culture was maintained at room temperature. 2568

Method of observations on life stages Egg The eggs were observed under microscope daily in the morning and evening till hatching. The egg was considered as hatched when tiny maggot came out from it. The eggs were examined for incubation period, hatching percentage, length and width. Incubation period was calculated from the date of egg laying to the date of hatching. Hatching percentage was calculated from the data on number of eggs hatched out of total number of eggs under observation. Maggot The maggots were examined for number of instars, total maggot period, length and width. The total maggot period was calculated from the date of egg hatching to the date of formation of prepupa. Pupa When fully grown maggot stopped feeding and became inactive, it was considered as prepupal stage. The prepupal period was recorded from the date of inactivation of fully grown maggot to date of formation of pupa. Pupal period was calculated from the date of formation of pupa to the date of emergence of the adult from the pupa. Adult In adult both the sexes were separated by visual observation under microscope. In male the abdomen was blunt, ovipositor became absent. Male was smaller in size than that of the female. Five pair of male and female was released in the oviposition cage individually. Cotton swab soaked in fruit juice of respective host was provided to the adults as food source. The tender fruit slices were also placed inside the oviposition cage for egg laying. The data on duration of pre-oviposition, oviposition, total longevity of male and female, sex ratio and fecundity were recorded. Pre-oviposition period was calculated from the date of emergence to the date of starting of laying egg. Oviposition period was calculated from date of starting laying egg to the date of stopping laying egg. Longevity of male and female was calculated from the date of emergence to the date of death of adults. The length and width was measured with help of Leica microscope and measuring software. Results and Discussion Egg The female of cucumber fruit fly inserted their eggs, partially or completely, into tissue of fruits by making incision with the help of saw like ovipositor. Freshly laid eggs (Plate 2) were glistening white, slightly curved, pointed at one end while, rounded at the other end. However, the number of eggs laid by a female, incubation period and ovipositional periods were derived on the basis of number of maggot emerged out from the eggs. The data on length and width of egg varied from 1.00 to 1.27 mm with a mean of 1.12 ± 0.07 mm and 0.23 to 0.35 mm with a mean of 0.28 ± 0.03 mm, respectively (Table 1). Similar results were reported by Mir et al., (2014) when reared on cucumber. Incubation period A pair of male and female was enclosed in a glass vial containing a slice of cucumber fruit for oviposition (Plate 1). The fruit slice were collected after 24 hour from the vial and kept individually into a separate vial for hatching 2569

of the eggs. As soon as the larvae emerged out from the fruit slice, the incubation period was recorded. The data thus obtained are summarized in Table 2 revealed that the incubation period varied from 13 to 29 hours with an average of 19.6 ± 4.72 day. These results are in the close agreement with those of Waseem et al., (2012) who reported that incubation period on cucumber lasted from 24.4 to 38 hr. Thus, the observations obtained through present investigations are in close confirmation with the earlier findings. Maggot An investigation was carried out to study the distinct maggot instars, instar durations and entire maggot period of this pest. Newly hatched maggot was reared individually up to pupation in separate glass vials containing fresh cucumber fruit (Plate 1). The data on body length and width, instar duration and total maggot period are presented in Table 1 and 2. First instar First instar maggot was apodous, translucent, elongate and white in colour. The measurement of first instar revealed that the body length and width (Table 1) varied from1.23 to 1.90 mm with an average of 1.52 ± 0.20 mm and 0.22 to 0.39 mm with an average of 0.31 ± 0.05 mm. Similar observations were reported by Mir et al., (2014) when reared on cucumber. Second instar The second instars were elongate, translucent and creamy white in colour. The second instar body length and width (Table 1) ranged from 4.92 to 7.35 mm with an average of 6.26 ± 0.78 mm and 1.09 to 1.33 mm with an average of 1.23 ± 0.06 mm. Third instar The third instars having a pointed head with well-developed mandibular hooks and spiracles. It has the ability to curving and springing into the air by the relaxation of certain muscles. By this ability the maggot was transferred to pupation site from fruit. The Third instar body length and width (Table 1) ranged from 8.34 to 10.53 mm with an average of 9.56 ± 0.66 mm and 1.84 to 2.55 mm with an average of 2.19 ± 0.22 mm. Similar observations were reported by Mir et al., (2014) when reared on cucumber. Number and duration of maggot instars of B. cucurbitae Observation on number and duration of maggot instars are presented in Table 2. The data in Table 2 observed that the maggot passed through three instars before attaining the pupal stage. The duration of first, second and third instar maggots varied from 0.6 to 1.0 days, 1.1 to 2.0 days and 2.1 to 3.0 days with an average of 0.81 ± 0.14, 1.60 ± 0.40 and 2.61 ± 0.29 days, respectively. The present findings are in close confirmation with the results reported by Mir et al., (2014). Prepupa and pupa In pupal stage of fruit fly, maggots of 3 rd instar were stopped feeding, became sluggish and become stable and stationary, this stage is prepupal stage. The pupae were cylindrical and deep brownish to gray in colour. In pupa black dot is found on the posterior part. Normally pupation occurs in soil. The prepupal stage was observed to be 0.6 to 1 day (Table 2). After prepupal development was completed, the insect goes into the pupal stage. Similar observations were recorded by Lanjar et al., (2013). 2570

Table.1 Bionomics of different life stages of B. cucurbitae reared on cucumber Stage Length(mm) Breadth(mm) Minimum Maximum Av. ± S.D. Minimum Maximum Av. ± S.D. Egg 1.00 1.27 1.12 ± 0.07 0.23 0.35 0.28 ± 0.03 1 st instar 1.23 1.90 1.52 ± 0.20 0.22 0.39 0.31 ± 0.05 2 nd instar 4.92 7.35 6.26 ± 0.78 1.09 1.33 1.23 ± 0.06 3 rd instar 8.34 10.53 9.56 ± 0.66 1.84 2.55 2.19 ± 0.22 Prepupa 6.20 6.58 6.37 ± 0.12 1.96 2.04 2.00 ± 0.02 Pupa 5.52 5.89 5.68 ± 0.11 2.49 2.67 2.57 ± 0.05 Adult (male) 8.21 8.72 8.18 ± 1.70 10.69 12.39 11.16 ± 5.70 Adult (female) 9.49 9.98 9.34 ± 1.90 14.90 16.60 15.43 ± 3.24 Table.2 Duration of different life stages of B. cucurbitae Stage Duration (Hours) Minimum Maximum Av. ± S.D. Egg(incubation period) 13.0 29.0 19.6 ± 4.72 1 st instar 0.6 1.0 0.81 ± 0.14 2 nd instar 1.1 2.0 1.60 ± 0.40 3 rd instar 2.1 3.0 2.61 ± 0.29 Total larval period 3.8 6.0 5.02 ± 0.83 Prepupal period 0.6 1.0 0.77 ± 0.42 Pupal period 8.0 9.0 8.55 ± 0.31 Total pupal period 8.6 10.0 9.12 ± 0.73 Facundity 59.0 91.0 74.84 ± 11.69 Preoviposition period 10.0 15.0 12.56 ± 1.62 Oviposition period 13.0 28.0 21.44 ± 4.89 Hatching percentage 82.0 88.0 85.24 ± 1.83 Adult period male 25.1 29.9 27.7 ± 1.42 Female 31.1 36.7 34.12 ± 1.50 Total life span male 13.0 30.0 21.92 ± 5.83 female 16.0 35.0 25.28 ± 5.96 Sex ratio (male : female) Male Female 1.12 total observed 200 adult 94 106 *All measurements are mean of 25 observations Measurements The body length of pupa was recorded and summarized in Table 1. It is evident from the data (Table 6) that the length and width of prepupa ranged from 6.20 to 6.58 mm with an average of 6.37 ± 0.12 mm and 1.96 to 2.04 mm with an average of 2.00 ± 0.02 mm. The total maggot period varied from 3.8 to 6 days with an average of 5.02 ± 0.83 days. Almost similar 2571 result was obtained by Mir et al., (2014) on cucumber. Duration of pupal stage of B. cucurbitae The 25 pupa are observed for examining the pupal period. The observations are presented in Table 2. The observation presented that the prepupal and pupa period varied from 0.6 to 1.0 days and 8.0 to 9.0 day with an average of 0.77

± 0.42 and 8.55 ± 0.31 days, respectively. The total prepupal and pupal period varied from 8.6 to 10 days with an average of 9.32 ± 0.73 days. Lanjar et al., (2013) observed the pupal period range between 7-13 days and the mean was 9.94 ± 1.03 days. Adult The adult flies emerged from pupa were pale yellow with wings stuck to their bodies and inactive. The fly takes a little time to take an appearance of fly. The adult having lemon yellow curved vertical markings on the thorax with reddish brown and shades on the outer border of the wings. Male flies were smaller than females. Male and female separated by presence of ovipositor in the posterior part of the abdomen. After 4-5 hrs the flies spread their wings. The length and width of the male with expanded wings was 8.18 ± 1.70 mm and 11.16 ± 5.70 mm, respectively, whereas, the female with expanded wings measured 9.34 ± 1.90 mm in length and 15.43 ± 3.24 mm in width. Table 1 findings are in close confirmation with the results reported by Mir et al., (2014). Measurements Body length and width across the expanded wings of male and female of B. cucurbitae are presented in Table 1. The data from Table 1 revealed that length of the male fruit fly ranged from 8.21 to 8.72 mm (8.18 ± 1.70 mm) in length and 10.69 to 12.39 mm (11.16 ± 5.70 mm) in width, whereas the female fruit fly measured from 9.49 to 9.98 mm with an average of 9.34 ± 1.90 mm in length and 14.90 to 16.60 mm with an average of 15.43 ± 3.24 mm in width. Thus, the male is smaller than female. The findings are in close confirmation with the results reported by Mir et al., (2014). The data indicated that the male and female fruit fly lived for 25.1 to 29.9 day (Average 27.7 ± 1.42 day) and from 31.1 to 36.7 day (Average 34.12 ± 1.50 day), respectively. Oviposition duration Pre-oviposition and oviposition periods of this pest are observed and summarized in Table 2. The data indicated that the pre-oviposition and oviposition periods varied from 10 to 15 and 13 to 28 days with an average of 12.56 ± 1.62 and 21.44 ± 4.89 days, respectively. Ovipositional potential To study the fecundity of the female, the newly emerged adult flies were collected and placed inside the rearing cages each (75 30 30 cm) (Plate 1). Each rearing cage had wire mesh on 5 sides and a wooden door at one side. The male and female flies were identified by visual examination under microscope. In male the abdomen was blunt and ovipositor absent. They were also smaller in size than that of the females. On the bottom of each cage there was a 2 cm-thick layer of sieved sand with 5 per cent moisture. A honey solution (10 % W/V) was provided inside the cage for adult feeding. This honey solution was kept in a 10 ml beaker and a thumb sized water-soaked cotton swab was laid in such a way that half of it was immersed in honey solution and remaining half stayed above rim of the beaker to keep the solution in reach of adult fruit flies. Slices of cucumber were kept inside each breeding cage for oviposition. These slices were replaced by fresh ones daily to avoid decay. The results are presented in Table 2. Longevity The longevity of adults of B. cucurbitae is examined and results obtained are given in Table 2. 2572 From Table 2 it is observed that the number of eggs produced by a single female varied from 59 to 91 eggs with an average of 74.84 ± 11.69 eggs in laboratory condition. Lanjar et al., (2013) observed that each female may lay 50 to over 91 eggs in the tissue of fruit.

Sex ratio of B. cucurbitae In fruit fly adult sexes were determined on the basis of the presence of ovipositor in female and absent in the male (Plate 2). The observations are presented in Table 2 showed that out of 200 laboratories reared adults, 94 were males and 106 were females given a male to female ratio of 1:1.12. Thus, the data clearly indicated that the females were predominant over males under laboratory conditions. Entire life span The duration of entire life span (from egg to the death of adult) of B. cucurbitae was observed and summarized in Table 2. It can be seen from the data that the life span of male varied from 13 to 30 days with an average of 21.92 ± 5.83 days and that of female, 16 to 35 days with an average of 25.28 ± 5.96 days. Thus, the life span of male was shorter than female. Little changes observed in the measurements were due to variation in the abiotic factors and genetic factors. References Bose T. K., Kabir J., Maity T. K., Parthasarathy V. A. and Som M. G. 2002. Cucumber in vegetable crops, 1: pp. 493-494. Lanjar A. G., Sahito H. A., Talpur M. A. and Channa M. S. 2013. Biology and Population of Melon Fruit fly on Musk Melon and Indian Squash. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences, 2(2): pp. 42-47. Laskar N. 2013. Biology and biometrics of melon fruit fly, Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coq.) on bitter gourd, Momordica charantia L. and pumpkin, Cucurbita pepo L. Current Biotica, 7(1&2): pp. 51-59. Mir S. H., Dar S. A., Mir G. M. and Ahmad S. B. 2014. Biology of Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet) on cucumber. Florida Entomologist 97(2): pp. 753-758. Pareek B. E. and kavadia V. S. 1974. Relative preference of fruit fly, Bectrocera Cucurbitae (Coquillet) on different cucurbits. Indian Journal of Entomology, 56(1): pp. 72-75. Thamburaj S. and Singh N. 2003. Text Books of Vegetables, Tuber crops and Spices. Kalyani publishers, Ludhiana. pp. 254-261. Vanitha S. M., Chaurasia S. N. S., Singh P. M. and Naik P. S. 2013. Vegetable Statistics. Technical Bulletin, IIVR, Varanasi, 51: p. 223. Waseem M. A., Nagangoud A., Patil B. V., Hussain P. A. 2009. Efficacy of some insecticides against melon fly, Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet) on cucumber. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science, 22(3): pp. 701-702. How to cite this article: Balas, T.K., D.M. Jethva, M.A. Karkar and Parekh, K.M. 2018. Bionomics of Fruit Fly, Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet) on Cucumber under Laboratory Condition. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 7(03): 2567-2573. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.297 2573