EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Similar documents
OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN BOARD OF ORTHODONTISTS APPENDIX 1 CASE PRESENTATION 2005

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC BOARD

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

SURGICAL - ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION IN AN ADULT PATIENT: A CASE REPORT

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

Transverse malocclusion, posterior crossbite and severe discrepancy*

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

Angle Class I malocclusion with anterior open bite treated with extraction of permanent teeth

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

Treatment of Class II non-extraction using the Bioprogressive method

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Dr Robert Drummond. BChD, DipOdont Ortho, MChD(Ortho), FDC(SA) Ortho. Canad Inn Polo Park Winnipeg 2015

ISW for the treatment of adult anterior crossbite with severe crowding combined facial asymmetry case

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

The practice of orthodontics is faced with new

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

An Innovative Treatment Approach with Atypical Orthodontic Extraction Pattern in Bimaxillary Protrusion Case

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Arrangement of the artificial teeth:

Maxillary Expansion and Protraction in Correction of Midface Retrusion in a Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient

Case Report Orthodontic Treatment of a Mandibular Incisor Extraction Case with Invisalign

#45 Ortho-Tain, Inc PREVENTIVE ERUPTION GUIDANCE -- PREVENTIVE OCCLUSAL DEVELOPMENT

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

Treatment of a severe class II division 1 malocclusion with twin-block appliance

Clinical efficacy of Invisalign treatment with weekly aligner changes: Two case reports

Sample Case #1. Disclaimer

Early Mixed Dentition Period

Preventive Orthodontics

CASE: HISPANIC SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (LA) Latin AGE: 10.5 VISUAL NORMS RMO X: 06/23/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2003

CASE: EXTRACTION Dr. TRAINING M (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.6 VISUAL NORMS RMO X: 02/06/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2003

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

Treatment of Angle Class III. Department of Paedodontics and Orthodontics Dr. habil. Melinda Madléna associate professor

Orthodontics-surgical combination therapy for Class III skeletal malocclusion

Correction of Class II Malocclusions in Growing Patients by Using the Invisalign Technique: Rational Bases and Treatment Staging

CHIN CUP: STILL A HAND TO HELP

Anterior Open Bite Correction with Invisalign Anterior Extrusion and Posterior Intrusion.

Correction of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion by Fixed Functional Class II Corrector Appliance: Case Report

Class II correction with Invisalign - Combo treatments. Carriere Distalizer.

Removable appliances

Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

Use of a Tip-Edge Stage-1 Wire to Enhance Vertical Control During Straight Wire Treatment: Two Case Reports

RETENTION AND RELAPSE

Comprehensive Orthodontic Diagnosis Align upper and lower arches is not a treatment plan!

Invisalign technique in the treatment of adults with pre-restorative concerns

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

Treatment planning of nonskeletal problems. in preadolescent children

Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment of Gummy Smile with Vertical Maxillary Excess

Class II. Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinician: Dr. Mike Mayhew, Boone, NC Patient: R.S. Cleft Lip and Palate.

Combined Orthodontic And Surgical Correction Of An Adolescent Patient With Thin Palatal Cortex And Vertical Maxillary Excess

Different Non Surgical Treatment Modalities for Class III Malocclusion

ortho case report Sagittal First international magazine of orthodontics By Dr. Luis Carrière Special Reprint

Hypodontia is the developmental absence of at

mandibular deficiency and maxillary and mandibular crowding: follow-up evaluation

Concepts of occlusion Balanced occlusion. Monoplane occlusion. Lingualized occlusion. Figure (10-1)

Orthodontic Treatment Using The Dental VTO And MBT System

Checklist with summary points

Case Report Unilateral Molar Distalization: A Nonextraction Therapy

S.H. Age: 15 Years 3 Months Diagnosis: Class I Nonextraction Severe crowding, very flat profile. Background:

Congenitally missing mandibular premolars treatment options for space closure. Educational aims and objectives. Expected outcomes

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

You. Fix. Could. This? Treatment solutions for typical and atypical adult relapse. 78 SEPTEMBER 2017 // orthotown.com

Significant improvement with limited orthodontics anterior crossbite in an adult patient

Angle Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary dental protrusion and missing mandibular first molars*

Unilateral Horizontally Impacted Maxillary Canine and First Premolar Treated with a Double Archwire Technique

Nonextraction Treatment of Upper Canine Premolar Transposition in an Adult Patient

RMO VISUAL NORMS. CASE: CHINESE SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (CH) Chinese AGE: 12.4 X: 09/30/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE

SKELETAL ANCHORAGE IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF A CLASS II MALOCCLUSION

Volume 22 No. 14 September Dentists, Federally Qualified Health Centers and Health Maintenance Organizations For Action

Arrangement of posterior artificial teeth Standardized parameters Curve of Wilson Curve of Spee

Research methodology University of Turku, Finland

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Transcription:

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS CANDIDATE NUMBER: Dr. Stefan Blasius Year: 2010 WBLO 01

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS CANDIDATE NUMBER: Dr. Stefan Blasius Year: 2010 WBLO 01

RÉSUMÉ OF CASE 1 CASE CATEGORY: ADULT MALOCCLUSION NAME: Daniel S. BORN: 21-02-1978 SEX: male PRE-TREATMENT RECORDS: AGE: 30/0 DATE: 22-02-2008 CLASSIFICATION: Adult malocclusion TEETH MISSING BEFORE TREATMENT: Maxillary whisdom teeth TREATMENT PLAN: APPLIANCE: Maxillary and mandibulary fixed lingual appliances TREATMENT STARTED: AGE: 30/2 DATE: 07-05-2008 TREATMENT FINISHED: AGE: 31/10 DATE: 21-12-2009 ACTIVE TREATMENT TIME: 19 months POST-TREATMENT RECORDS: AGE: 31/10 DATE: 21-12-2009 RETAINERS: a)upper: fix retainer, Hawley a)lower: fix retainer, Hawley DATE: 21-12-2009 RETENTION ENDED: a)upper: a)lower: DATE: permanent RETENTION TIME: Permanent retention (POST-) RETENTION RECORDS: AGE: - DATE: - TIME OUT OF RETENTION: Permanent retention WBLO 02

DIAGNOSTIC DESCRIPTION OF THE MALOCCLUSION A. SUMMARY Patient s chief complaint: unesthetic smile, rotation of maxillary lateral incisors B. EXAMINATION OF HEAD AND FACE Patient s pogonion is shifted slightly to the right No signs of severe disproportions C. FUNCTIONAL EXAMINATION No presence of difficulty in oral function D. INTRAORAL EXAMINATION Right side: Class II, left side: Class I canine and Class III molar relationship Midline discrepancy (mild maxillary dental midline shift to left) Anterior deep bite 3,5 mm Rotation and scissors-bite tendency of upper right first premolar Space deficiency and rotation of maxillary lateral incisors No crossbite E. DENTAL CASTS Mandibular arch: severe rotation of 14, moderate dental crowding, rotation 12, 22 Maxillary arch: mild arch perimeter tooth mass discrepancy, accentuated curve of spee Occlusion sagittal: right - Class II canine and molar, left - Class I canine and Class III molar Occlusion vertical: Anterior deep bite 3,5 mm Occlusion transversal: scissors-bite tendency of upper right first premolar CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 07-05-2008 AGE: 30/0 WBLO 03

FRONTAL SMILING PROFILE FACIAL PHOTOGRAPHS BEFORE TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 07-05-2008 AGE: 30/0 WBLO 04

Right Buccal Left Buccal Upper Occlusal Center Lower Occlusal INTRA-ORAL COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OCCLUSION BEFORE TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 07-05-2008 AGE: 30/0 WBLO 05

LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPH BEFORE TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 07-05-2008 AGE: 30/0 WBLO 06

TRACING OF LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPH BEFORE TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 07-05-2008 AGE: 30/0 WBLO 07

CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 1 Sagittal Skeletal Relations Maxillary Position S-N-A Mandibular Position S-N-B Sagittal Jaw Relation A-N-B Vertical Skeletal Relations Maxillary Inclination S-N / ANS-PNS Mandibular Inclination S-N / Go-Gn Vertical Jaw Relation ANS-PNS / Go-Gn Dento-Basal Relations Maxillary Incisor Inclination 1 - ANS-PNS Mandibular Incisor Inclination 1 - Go-Gn Mandibular Incisor Compensation 1 - A-Pg (mm) Dental Relations Pretreatment Mean SD 82,7 82º± 3.5º 80,6 80º± 3.5º 2,1 2º± 2.5º 13,3 8º± 3.0º 24,1 33º± 2.5º 10,9 25º± 6.0º 116,0 110º± 6.0º 92,2 94º± 7.0º 0,1 2± 2.0 Overjet (mm) 2,9 3.5± 2.5 Overbite (mm) 3,6 2± 2.5 Interincisal Angle 1 / 1 140,9 132º± 6.0º CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 07-05-2008 AGE: 30/0 WBLO 08

PERIAPICAL OR PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS BEFORE TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 07-05-2008 AGE: 30/0 WBLO 09

No need for other radiographs ANY OTHER RADIOGRAPHS BEFORE TREATMENT If needed CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 07-05-2008 AGE: 30/0 WBLO 10

RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS BEFORE TREATMENT A. INTRAORAL / PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH Panoramic Radiograph: Absence of maxillary wisdom teeth Impaction of mandibular wisdom teeth Moderately decreased bone level according to patients age B. INTERPRETATION OF CEPHALOMETRIC ASSESSMENT 1. Sagittal skelettal relations: position of the maxilla and the mandible within the normal range, skelettal Class I maloccusion 2. Vertikal sklettal relations: brachyfacial pattern, posterior impaction of the maxilla, decreased lower anterior face height 3. Dento-basal relations: proclination of the maxillary incisors, mandibular incisors slightly uprighted 4. Dental relations: increased interincisal angle, absence of tooth 18,28, visibility of tooth 38, 48 5. Esthetic profile: mild posterior divergent profile, increased nasolabial angle CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 07-05-2008 AGE: 30/0 WBLO 11

TREATMENT PLAN AND THE REASON FOR IT Treatment Plan: 1. Bonding maxillary and mandibulary arch with lingual fixed appliances 2. Correct Class II on the right side 3. Derotation of upper right first premolar 4. Distalisation of upper right canine 5. Correct midline discrepancy 6. Establish proper incisor angulation 7. Eliminate maxillary and mandibulary crowding 8. Detailing and Finishing 9. Retention The reason for this treatment is 1. to improve facial appearance and smile esthetics and 2. to achieve functional balance due to elimination of the scissors-bite tendency of upper right first premolar CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 07-05-2008 AGE: 30/0 WBLO 12

TREATMENT STEPS INTRA-ORAL OCCLUSAL VIEW COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS UPPER ARCH CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: div. AGE: div. WBLO 12-1

TREATMENT STEPS INTRA-ORAL OCCLUSAL VIEW COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS LOWER ARCH CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: div. AGE: div. WBLO 12-2

RÉSUMÉ OF THE TREATMENT CARRIED OUT INCLUDING ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED Treatment Gouvernance: 1. Bonding maxillary and mandibulary arch with lingual fixed appliances 2. Correct Class II on the right side with Class II elastics 3. Derotation of upper lateral incisors appeared to being more difficult than expected (problem solved by alastic lasso-technique) 4. Establish proper incisor angulation 5. Eliminate maxillary and mandibulary crowding 6. Establish correct overjet and overbite (including levelling curve of spee) 7. Detailing and Finishing 8. Retention CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 21-12-2009 AGE: 31/10 WBLO 13

SMILING FRONTAL PROFILE FACIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 21-12-2009 AGE: 31/10 WBLO 14

Right Buccal Upper Occlusal Left Buccal Center Lower Occlusal INTRA-ORAL COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OCCLUSION AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 21-12-2009 AGE: 31/10 WBLO 15

LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPH AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 21-12-2009 AGE: 31/10 WBLO 16

TRACING OF LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPH AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 21-12-2009 AGE: 31/10 WBLO 17

CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 2 Pretreatment Posttreatment Mean SD Maxillary Position S-N-A 82,7 82,5 82º± 3.5º Mandibular Position S-N-B 80,6 80,7 80º± 3.5º Sagittal Jaw Relation A-N-B 2,1 1,8 2º± 2.5º Maxillary Inclination S-N / ANS-PNS 13,3 13,0 8º± 3.0º Mandibular Inclination S-N / Go-Gn 24,1 24,7 33º± 2.5º Vertical Jaw Relation ANS-PNS / Go-Gn 10,9 11,6 25º± 6.0º Maxillary Incisor Inclination 1 - ANS-PNS 116,0 118,2 110º± 6.0º Mandibular Incisor Inclination 1 - Go-Gn 92,2 93,4 94º± 7.0º 0,1 2,1 2± 2.0 Overjet (mm) 2,9 2,8 3.5± 2.5 Overbite (mm) 3,6 1,9 2± 2.5 140,9 133,0 Sagittal Skeletal Relations Vertical Skeletal Relations Dento-Basal Relations Mandibular Incisor Compensation 1 - A-Pg (mm) Dental Relations Interincisal Angle 1/1 CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 21-12-2009 132º± 6.0º AGE: 31/10 WBLO 18

PERIAPICAL OR PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 21-12-2009 AGE: 31/10 WBLO 19

RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT A. INTRAORAL / PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH Panoramic Radiograph: Moderate distal root angultion of upper right first premolar Absence of maxillary wisdom teeth Impaction of mandibular wisdom teeth (extractions will be performed by prescription in the near future) B. INTERPRETATION OF CEPHALOMETRIC ASSESSMENT 1. Sagittal skelettal relations: position of the maxilla and the mandible within the normal range, skelettal Class I maloccusion 2. Vertikal skelettal relations: brachyfacial pattern, posterior impaction of the maxilla, decreased lower anterior face height 3. Dento-basal relations: proclination of the maxillary incisors, mandibular incisors in a favourable position, correct overjet and overbite 4. Dental relations: normal interincisal angle, absence of tooth 18,28, presence of tooth 38, 48 5. Esthetic profile: mild posterior divergent profile, increased nasolabial angle CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 21-12-2009 AGE: 31/10 WBLO 20

DESCRIPTION OF THE TREATMENT RESULT Treatment Result Orientation: 1. Improved smile esthetics and facial harmony 2. Occlusal relationship: Super Class I (Class I canine and mild Class III Molar relationship) 3. Correct interincisal angulation 4. Normal overjet and overbite 5. Retention objectives: permanent / lifelong retention CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 21-12-2009 AGE: 31/10 WBLO 21

DESCRIPTION OF THE POST-TREATMENT EVALUATION OF RETENTION Retention Result Orientation: 1. Retention objectives: permanent / lifelong retention 2. Check stability of correct rotational position of maxillary lateral incisors and maxillary right first premolar in short intervals 3. Control stability of occlusion and stability of overjet and overbite CANDIDATE NUMBER: SB DATE: 21-12-2009 AGE: 31/10 WBLO 21-1