The Ontogeny and Durability of True and False Memories: A Fuzzy Trace Account

Similar documents
The effect of testing on the vulnerability to misinformation in adolescents and adults

Memory II. Reconstructive Memory Forgetting

The effects of the age of eyewitnesses on the accuracy and suggestibility of their testimony.

Position Paper on Documenting Forensic Interviews

Confidence and Memory Accuracy: Do we know what we think we know? Bennett Brocka. University of Iowa

When is an intervening line-up most likely to affect eyewitness identification accuracy?

Categorization and Memory: Representation of Category Information Increases Memory Intrusions

The Counterintuitive Relationship between Conceptual and Perceptual Similarities and Eyewitness Suggestibility

Induction in Children and Adults

Children's Ability to Distinguish between Memories from Multiple Sources: Implications for the Quality and Accuracy of Eyewitness Statements

LIVIA L. GILSTRAP Present Assistant Professor, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

Technical accuracy vs. content accuracy. Is this good or bad? Advantages/Disadvantages

THE RELIABILITY OF EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE 1. Time to Exonerate Eyewitness Memory. John T. Wixted 1. Author Note

Investigative Interviewing 1 PSY 4931

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE. Research Report

Memory Schemas, Source Monitoring & Eyewitness Memory

Why misinformation is more likely to be recognised over time: A source monitoring account

Memory part I. Memory Distortions Eyewitness Testimony Lineup Studies

Forced confabulation affects memory sensitivity as well as response bias

Effects of varying presentation time on long-term recognition memory for scenes: Verbatim and gist representations

Eyewitness testimony and memory distortion

Running head: SIMULTANEOUS SUPERIORITY, NOT A SELECTION BIAS 1

Children s Episodic and Generic Reports of Alleged Abuse

Brad Schaffer Forensic Psychology July 22, Schaffer 1

INTERVIEWS II: THEORIES AND TECHNIQUES 5. CLINICAL APPROACH TO INTERVIEWING PART 1

What is Science 2009 What is science?

testing for implicit bias

Misled Subjects May Know More Than Their Performance Implies

Accuracy and Confidence in Person Identification: The Relationship is Strong when Witnessing Conditions Vary Widely

Misleading Postevent Information and the Memory Impairment Hypothesis: Comment on Belli and Reply to Tversky and Tuchin

False Memories and the Source Monitoring Framework: Reply to Reyna and Lloyd (1997)

City, University of London Institutional Repository

City, University of London Institutional Repository

Event Frequency and Children s Suggestibility: A Study of Cued Recall Responses

Cognitive domain: Comprehension Answer location: Elements of Empiricism Question type: MC

Psychology 458 Winter, 2011 The Mind and the Law

Misinformation and Need for Cognition: How They Affect False Memories

A Field Experiment on Eyewitness Report

Evaluation? ELIZABETH COWLEY EUNIKA JANUS* University of New South Wales. School of Marketing Working Paper 03/2

Book Note: In Doubt: The Psychology Of The Criminal Justice Process, by Dan Simon

C242 Comparing Decay Rates 1. Running head: COMPARING DECAY RATES FOR FALSE MEMORIES. Comparing Decay Rates for Accurate and False Memories

Science in Natural Resource Management ESRM 304

The Suggestibility of Older Witnesses

When Misinformation Improves Memory: The Effects of Recollecting Change

Explaining the role of emotional valence in children's memory suggestibility

A Simplified Conjoint Recognition Paradigm for the Measurement of Gist and Verbatim Memory

Chapter 02 Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior

The Fate of Memory: Comment on McCloskey and Zaragoza

6. A theory that has been substantially verified is sometimes called a a. law. b. model.

I know your face but not where I saw you: Context memory is impaired for other-race faces

Memory 2/15/2017. The Three Systems Model of Memory. Process by which one encodes, stores, and retrieves information

METHODOLOGY FOR DISSERTATION

Assessing the Credibility of Witnesses of Paranormal Activity:

Lecturer: Dr. Benjamin Amponsah, Dept. of Psychology, UG, Legon Contact Information:

A model of parallel time estimation

Interviewing Witnesses: The Effect of Forced Confabulation on Event Memory

Audio: In this lecture we are going to address psychology as a science. Slide #2

Journal of Memory and Language

Michael Norman International &

False Memories: The effect of confidence ratings on free recall tests. Katie Jensen. Gustavus Adolphus College

The Standard Theory of Conscious Perception

in google, bing, yahoo and other mayor seach engine. This special edition completed with other document such as :

Critical Thinking Rubric. 1. The student will demonstrate the ability to interpret information. Apprentice Level 5 6. graphics, questions, etc.

THE INTERPRETATION OF EFFECT SIZE IN PUBLISHED ARTICLES. Rink Hoekstra University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Reducing Children s False Identification Rates in Lineup Procedures

Where Small Voices Can Be Heard

Memory. Chapter 7 Outline. Human Memory: Basic Questions. Memory 10/2/ Prentice Hall 1. Chapter 7. How is pulled back out ( ) from memory?

What Children Know About the Source of their Knowledge. Without Reporting it as the Source. S.N. Haigh, Keele University, U.K. E.J.

Running head: FALSE MEMORY AND EYEWITNESS TESTIMONIAL Gomez 1

Elizabeth Loftus. Lost in the mall study 1992

Discovering Statistics: Experimental Project

Examples of Feedback Comments: How to use them to improve your report writing. Example 1: Compare and contrast

Consciousness and Intrinsic Higher- Order Content

How Does Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) Improve Intelligence Analysis?

THE FORMATION OF FALSE MEMORIES LOFTUS AND PECKRILL (1995)

Analysis of complex patterns of evidence in legal cases: Wigmore charts vs. Bayesian networks

Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell. Advances in Neuroscience and the Rules of Evidence

THE ROLE OF TIME DELAY IN MEMORY CONFORMITY

Scientific Method in Biology

The interplay of domain-specific and domain general processes, skills and abilities in the development of science knowledge

False memory and importance: Can we prioritize encoding without consequence?

2. Source Monitoring. False Memories, Psychology of

Percent-produced effects in recognition 1. The production effect in recognition memory: Weakening strength can strengthen distinctiveness

Encoding of Elements and Relations of Object Arrangements by Young Children

Multiple Comparisons and the Known or Potential Error Rate

FORCE SCIENCE INSTITUTE, Ltd.

Source monitoring in eyewitness memory: Implicit associations, suggestions, and episodic traces

When Sample Size Matters: The Influence of Sample Size and Category Variability on Children s and Adults Inductive Reasoning

Testing Promotes Eyewitness Accuracy with a Warning Implications for Retrieval Enhanced Suggestibility

Review of Tim Bayne s The Unity of Consciousness

Fukuoka University of Education


What is the Scientific Method?

Leading Words and Estimation

The effect of repeated experience on children s suggestibility across two question types

Scientific Method in Biology

SOME PRINCIPLES OF FIELD EXPERlMENTS WITH SHEEP By P. G. SCHINCICEL *, and G. R. MOULE *

Cognitive Modeling. Lecture 9: Intro to Probabilistic Modeling: Rational Analysis. Sharon Goldwater

5. is the process of moving from the specific to the general. a. Deduction

Transcription:

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY 71, 165 169 (1998) ARTICLE NO. CH982468 The Ontogeny and Durability of True and False Memories: A Fuzzy Trace Account Stephen J. Ceci Cornell University and Maggie Bruck McGill University Fuzzy-trace theory has been developed by Brainerd and Reyna (1998, this issue) to explain a variety of findings. Here we explore the way that fuzzy-trace theory handles three phenomena concerning the creation and maintenance of false memories. We show that fuzzy-trace theory can account for seemingly paradoxical findings, thus providing theoretical clarity that has heretofore been lacking in the developmental literature. 1998 Academic Press In the past few years there has been a spate of developmental findings that seem, at first glance, contradictory. Among the questions that emerge from this work are first, why false recognitions sometimes increase with age, sometimes decrease with age, and occasionally appear to be developmentally invariant; second, why larger misinformation effects are sometimes found for older children while sometimes the reverse has been reported; and third, why suggestibility been shown to be a function of trace strength in some studies (e.g., Pezdek & Roe, 1995) but not in others (Howe, 1991; Zaragoza, 1991). Although explanations have been offered for each of these sets of contradictory findings, the challenge has been to account for all of them within a single framework in a manner that is anticipatory rather than post hoc and that is generative of testable hypotheses. Brainerd and Reyna (1998, this issue) provide just such a theoretical framework for these diverse and seemingly disparate This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation to S. J. Ceci (SBR-9312202) and by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council to M. Bruck (OGP000A1181). Address reprint requests to S. J. Ceci at the Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. 165 0022-0965/98 $25.00 Copyright 1998 by Academic Press All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

166 CECI AND BRUCK findings. In particular, they provide a principled basis to account for inconsistencies in the developmental literature by examining, separately, the processes and contributions of first, false alarms (false recognitions) and, second, erroneous rejection of actual targets. As we argue below, fuzzy-trace theory is the engine driving this accomplishment. Much is already known about the formation of false memories that results from the introduction of misleading postevent questioning (Ceci & Bruck, 1993). However, considerably less is known about the formation of false memories that arise spontaneously, that is, that are self-generated. Brainerd and Reyna s fuzzytrace theory provides the first unified theoretical account of the twin phenomena of the formation of spontaneous self-generated false memories as well as the formation of false memories that are induced through misleading, postevent misinformation. This theoretical achievement alone would be reason to take notice of their approach, but it has another, more subtle, advantage: Because fuzzy-trace theory is embedded in a broad empirical framework it is possible to generate testable predictions about the durability and persistence of true and false memories. Below we describe three previously unexplained findings that fuzzytrace theory predicts: (1) reverse developmental effects, (2) differential timecourses for true and false recognitions, and (3) the memorial bases of developmental suppression of hit rates along with the simultaneous elevation of certain types of false alarms. Before addressing these issues, it should be noted that fuzzy-trace theory predicts all three findings by virtue of its elegant demonstration that verbatim and gist memory can be functionally independent of each other. Several empirical examples of this principle have been reported (see also Brainerd, 1996; Brainerd et al., 1997; Reyna, 1996). In one type of experiment (e.g., Brainerd & Gordon, 1994; Reyna & Kiernan, 1994), target information is presented (for example, that Farmer Brown owns 10 cows, 7 sheep, and 2 horses) and, later, memory tests are administered for both its verbatim content (Does Farmer Brown own 10 cows? How many sheep does Farmer Brown own?) and various forms of gist (Does Farmer Brown own more sheep or more horses? What type of animal does Farmer Brown have the most of?) It has typically been found that the accuracy of children s (and adult s) performance on gist-memory tests is statistically independent of their performance on tests for the verbatim content that instantiated that gist in the first place. In these same experiments, further evidence for the independence of verbatim and gist traces has been provided by manipulations that dissociate performance on the two types of tests (i.e., manipulations that improve verbatim accuracy without affecting gist accuracy, and vice versa). In the lead paper, Brainerd and Reyna (1998, this issue) have presented mathematical models that allow the types of memory judgments that are supported by verbatim traces (identity and nonidentity) and by gist traces (similarity) to be factored and separately quantified. This step is crucial to bring order to the seemingly contradictory claims enumerated earlier.

REFLECTIONS ON BRAINERD & REYNA 167 Reverse developmental effects. Although it is widely accepted that suggestibility decreases with age, fuzzy-trace theory predicts that reverse developmental effects will appear under specific conditions. In particular, it predicts age increases in suggestibility whenever suggestibility effects depend primarily on verbatim memory for the misinformation (which will improve with age) rather than on forgetting of the original information (which will decrease). An extrapolation of this position leads to the prediction that suggestibility will increase with age whenever the suggestibility is dependent on memory for complex gists. This prediction rests on the premise that older, but not younger, children will have the ability to understand these complex meanings or make these inferences. In the lead article, Brainerd and Reyna review data which show increases in suggestibility with age; these data were obtained under conditions which, according to fuzzy-trace theory, should favor age-linked increases in suggestibility. Not only are these results theoretically intriguing, but they may also have important consequences for how we assess the credibility of child witness testimony in certain court cases. For instance, if interviewers suggested many things to an 8-year-old, the prosecution might argue that one need not be concerned with this high degree of suggestion because preschoolers, not 8-yearolds, exhibit heightened suggestibility under such conditions. However, if the 8-year-old is testifying to specific alleged facts, the child would be more likely to recollect the verbatim details of the interviewer s suggestion than even preschoolers would be. This helps explain the occurrences, albeit rare, in which older children exhibit more suggestibility than younger children (Duncan, Whitney, & Kunen, 1982; some aspects of Pezdek & Roe s, 1995 findings). Time-course for true and false recognitions. Fuzzy-trace theory makes the counterintuitive prediction that false memories, under the relevant experimental conditions, persist longer than true memories. The memorial basis of correct recognition (i.e., hits) is verbatim processing, which deteriorates faster than gist-based processing and which, under appropriate experimental conditions, underpins false recognitions. Under such conditions, it follows that the memorial basis of hits can be expected to shift over time from verbatim to gist based while the memorial basis of false recognitions remains stable (i.e., gist based). Hence, under the relevant experimental conditions, false recognitions should have greater durability than hits. Developmental suppression of hit rates. Misinformation can have either of two results; first, it can lead to the suppression of correct identification, and second, it can lead to the elevation of false recognition rates if the foils entail the misinformation s gist. By assuming that (1) judgments made on the basis of verbatim processing customarily lead to hits, (2) that the suppression effect is due to retrieval of some of this verbatim information, and (3) that judgments of nonidentity lead to rejection of related distracters, then the elevation of incorrect decisions can be the result of either the retrieval of verbatim traces or gist-based aspects of the misinformation that was presented. This is a tidy way of account-

168 CECI AND BRUCK ing for the diverse findings that have appeared in the literature in recent years (e.g., the different patterns reported in Ceci, Ross, & Toglia, 1987; Howe, 1995; and Pezdek & Roe, 1995). Suggestibility and trace strength. Perhaps nowhere has the confusion been greater than over the claim that suggestibility is independent of the strength of the original memory (Howe, 1991). Intuitively, one would expect instead that the stronger one s memory of something, the harder it would be to overwrite it with false suggestions. Although there is ample empirical support for the intuitive claim that it is hard to alter strong beliefs and memories (Pezdek & Roe, 1995; Warren & Lane, 1995), there are several sets of findings that complicate this intuition (Howe, 1991; Zaragoza, 1991). Brainerd and Reyna s framework allows us to go beyond intuition by providing an account of why and when trace strength manipulations should be associated with suggestibility. In Experiments 1 and 2 Brainerd and Reyna found between-group variation as a function of trace strength. However, in Experiment 3, they found that the effect is essentially reversed for related distracters when targets are still fresh. This finding is consistent with a trace strength hypothesis. Finally, we come to the potential forensic implications of Brainerd and Reyna s distinction between spontaneous and induced false memories. In forensic cases, an important consideration is false memory reports that arise from specific suggestions by police, social workers, parents, and therapists. One aspect of developmental research that has become widely known to law enforcement and social services interviewers is the admonition to avoid interviewing young children suggestively. However, there is still little awareness that some false memories arise spontaneously (i.e., they are not induced by the interviewer s suggestions). Indeed, spontaneous false memories are a routine part of everyday memory, probably more common than the implanted variety. Brainerd and Reyna s article may well become known for the empirical separation and explanation of these two sources of inaccuracy. Among the many contributions of their work, this may be the most lasting. REFERENCES Brainerd, C. J. (1996). Children s forgetting, with implications for memory suggestibility. In N. L. Stein, P. A. Ornstein, C. J. Brainerd, and B. Tversky (Eds.), Memory for everyday and emotional events (pp. 209 236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1998). Fuzzy-trace theory and children s false memories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 81 129. Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Kneer, R. (1995). False-recognition reversal: When similarity is distinctive. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 157 185. Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility and the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403 439. Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (1987). Suggestibility in children s memory: Psycholegal implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 38 49. Duncan, E. M., Whitney, P., & Kunen, S. (1982). Integration of visual and verbal information in children s memories. Child Development, 53, 1215 1223.

REFLECTIONS ON BRAINERD & REYNA 169 Howe, M. L. (1991). Misleading children s story recall: Reminiscence of the facts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 746 762. Pezdek, K., & Roe, C. (1995). The effect of memory trace strength on suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 116 128. Warren, A. R., & Lane, P. (1995). The effects of timing and type of questioning on eyewitness accuracy and suggestibility. In M. Zaragoza (Ed.), Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 44 60). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Zaragoza, M. (1991). Preschool children s susceptibility to memory impairment. In J. L. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children s recollections (pp. 27 39). Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association. Received: April 22, 1998; revised: July 24, 1998