a SpringerOpen Journal

Similar documents
Impact of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding on Obesity Co-morbidities in the Medium- and Long-Term

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 9 (2013) Original article

Bariatric Surgery Update

Bariatric surgery: Impact on Co-morbidities and Weight Loss Expectations ALIYAH KANJI, MD FRCSC MIS AND BARIATRIC SURGERY SEPTEMBER 22, 2018

Disclosures. Obesity and Its Challenges: Outline. Outline 5/2/2013. Lan Vu, MD Division of Pediatric Surgery Department of Surgery

A Bariatric Patient in my Waiting Room: Choosing the Right Patient for the Right Operation: Bariatric Surgery Indications

CHANGES IN COMORBID DISEASES IN MORBIDLY OBESE PATIENTS TREATED BY LAPAROSCOPIC ADJUSTABLE GASTRIC BANDING

Bariatric Surgery Update

Weight Loss Surgery. Outline 3/30/12. What Every GI Nurse Needs to Know. Define Morbid Obesity & its Medical Consequences. Treatments for Obesity

Bariatric Surgery: Indications and Ethical Concerns

Gastric Emptying Time after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Other Ways to Achieve Metabolic Control

Current Trends in Bariatric Surgery

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band The Safest, Effective Procedure for Treating Obesity and Obesity Related Disease

What s New in Bariatric Surgery?

Bariatric Surgery. Options & Outcomes

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Type II Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Patients with Body Mass Index of 25 35

Morbid Obesity A Curable Disease?

New insights in metabolic surgery

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes

Policy Specific Section: April 14, 1970 June 28, 2013

Adjustable Gastric Band Surgery: Review of Current Practice. Dr. Chris Cobourn The Surgical Weight Loss Centre Mississauga, Ontario Canada

Viriato Fiallo, MD Ursula McMillian, MD

Khalid Al Khalifa 1 and Ahmed Al Ansari 2*

Subject: Weight Loss Surgery Effective Date: 1/1/2000 Review Date: 8/1/2017

Current Status of Bariatric Surgery in Asia

Endorsed by Executive Council June 17, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery

Lecture Goals. Body Mass Index. Obesity Definitions. Bariatric Surgery What the PCP Needs to Know 11/17/2009. Indications for bariatric Surgeries

Medical Policy Bariatric Surgery. Document Number: 042 Commercial and Qualified Health Plans MassHealth Authorization required X X

Session 6B Appropriate Treatment of Obesity Demonstrates Clinical & Economic Success

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF OBESITY. Anne Lidor, MD, MPH Professor of Surgery Chief, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery

BARIATRIC SURGERY AND TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Access to Proven Therapies

Surgical Treatment of Obesity. 1. Understand who is an appropriate candidate for referral for surgical weight loss.

CME Post Test. D. Treatment with insulin E. Age older than 55 years

Mustafa W. Aman, M.D. Director, Bariatric Surgery Program Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital

ADVANCE AT YOUR OWN PACE

Surgical management of super super obese patients: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy

2/10/2014 CARDIOVASCULAR BENEFITS OF BARIATRIC SURGERY. Disclosures. My Background

SOUND HEALTH & WELLNESS TRUST

Surgical Therapy for Morbid Obesity. Janeen Jordan, PGY 5 Surgical Grand Rounds April 7, 2008

Not over when the surgery is done: surgical complications of obesity

National Position Statement

Commonly Performed Bariatric Procedures in Singapore. Lin Jinlin Associate Consultant General, Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery Changi General Hospital

Chapter 4 Section 13.2

Chapter 4 Section 13.2

7th International Congress of the Spanish Society of Obesity Surgery. Valladolid Spain May, 2004.

Outcome after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding 8 Years Experience

Imaging of gastric bands and their complications: an educational pictorial review

The Obesity Epidemic: Its Impact in the Workplace and What Employers Can Do

Disclosures OBESITY. Overview. Obesity: Definition. Prevalence of Obesity is Rising. Obesity as a Risk Factor. None

Comparison Between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding for Morbid Obesity: a Meta-analysis

Zia H Shah MD FCCP. Director of Sleep Lab Our Lady Of Lourdes Hospital, Binghamton

Bariatric Surgery as an Ambulatory Procedure

OBESITY IN PRIMARY CARE

Bariatric Surgery MM /11/2001. HMO; PPO; QUEST 05/01/2012 Section: Surgery Place(s) of Service: Outpatient; Inpatient

Overview. Stanley J. Rogers, MD, FACS Associate Clinical Professor of Surgery University of California San Francisco

Gastric bypass vs. Sleeve gastrectomy

Manipal & Apollo Spectra Hospital. Special Interest:Laparoscopy & Bariatric Surgery

Jacek Szopinski MD, PhD. This presentation contains pictures and schemes addopted from lecture by S.Dabrowiecki MD PhD with his kind permission

JAMA February 10, 2010 Laparoscopic Adjustable Banding in Severely Obese Adolescents: A Randomized Trial

Supplementary Appendix

type 2 diabetes is a surgical disease

Treating Type 2 Diabetes by Treating Obesity. Vijaya Surampudi, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Medicine Center for Human Nutrition

Supplementary Online Content

Primary Outcome Results of DiRECT the Diabetes REmission Clinical Trial

Roux-and-Y Gastric Bypass and its Metabolic Effects

Bariatric Care Center Outcomes Report

Assessing and Preparing Patients for Bariatric Surgery- A Case Study. Abeer AlSaweer, FMAB*

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding in 1,791 Consecutive Obese Patients: 12-Year Results

Hypertension and obesity. Dr Wilson Sugut Moi teaching and referral hospital

Marc Bessler, M.D.*, Amna Daud, M.D., M.P.H., Teresa Kim, M.D., Mary DiGiorgi, M.P.H.

Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes 3-Year Outcomes

Bariatric Surgery. Overview of Procedural Options

ENTRY CRITERIA: C. Approved Comorbidities: Diabetes

A critical appraisal by an anesthesiologist. Marc Van de Velde Anesthesiology UZ Leuven KUL Belgium. Disclaimer.

Benefits of Bariatric Surgery

Bariatric Surgery: A Cost-effective Treatment of Obesity?

Sleeve Gastrectomy: Harmful. John C. Eun, PGY-5 General Surgery Grand Rounds University of Colorado Denver 11/22/10

Medium- to Long-Term Outcomes of Gastric Banding in Adolescents: a Single-Center Study of 97 Consecutive Patients

Bariatric Surgery and Diabetes: Implications of Type 1 Versus Insulin-Requiring Type 2

Bariatric Surgery. The Oregon Bariatric Center Surgical Team

Epidemics of Obesity in the United States

SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR OBESITY: WHATS THE BEST OPTION? Natan Zundel, MD, FACS

Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Cardio-Metabolic Outcomes

MEDICAL COVERAGE POLICY. SERVICE: Bariatric (Weight Loss) Surgery Policy Number: 053 Effective Date: 08/01/2017 Last Review: 05/16/2017

Technique. Matthew Bettendorf, MD Essentia Health Duluth Clinic. Laparoscopic approach One 12mm port, Four 5mm ports

Mid-term results of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared results of the SLEEVEPASS and SM-BOSS trials

Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding in the Elderly

Goals 1/9/2018. Obesity over the last decade Surgery has become a safer management strategy Surgical options for management

Impact of Physical Activity on Metabolic Change in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients

Diagnosis and management of early gastric band slip after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

Comparison of Comorbidity Resolution and Improvement between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding

Diabetes control and lessened cerebral cardiovascular risks after gastric bypass surgery in Asian Taiwanese with a body mass index <35 kg/m2

DISCLOSURES. Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) As An Option For Failed Gastric Bypass Procedure In Obese Patients

Chairman s Rounds, 02/15/2011

Allina Health Weight Management Weight Loss Surgery Online Post-test

Bariatric Surgery: The Primary Care Approach

Robotic Bariatric Surgery. Richdeep S. Gill, MD Research Fellow Center for the Advancement of Minimally Invasive Surgery (CAMIS)

Reoperation Bariatric Surgery:

Transcription:

Al Khalifa et al. SpringerPlus 2013, 2:19 a SpringerOpen Journal RESEARCH Open Access Reduction in weight and BMI and changes in Co-morbidities following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedure for morbidly obese patients in Bahrain: a five year longitudinal study Khalid Al Khalifa 1, Claudio Violato 2 and Ahmed Al Ansari 3,4* Abstract Background: Obesity and its related illnesses are pan-endemic health problems which require intervention. Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) is seen as a safe surgical procedure with satisfactory results on weight reduction and improvement in obesity related illness. Methods: Data were collected in a repeated-measures longitudinal five year study for 143 morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Follow up was continued from 3 to 60 months post operatively. Patients were assessed for diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia. Results: Repeated measures ANOVAs revealed that both men and women lose weight and reduce their BMIs at a consistent rate. At 3, 6 and 9 months post-operative there are no differences in percent weight loss between men and women with mean weight loss at 8.9%, 13.1% and 16.0% respectively of pre-operative weight. At 12, 24 and 60 months post-operatively, however, men significantly increase the percentage of weight loss as well as improve their BMI compared to women (p <.05). At 24 months post-operative, men and women have BMIs of 36.03 and 32.85, both still in the obese range. By 60 months men have achieved a BMI that is slightly under the obese range into the overweight range (30.76) while women (BMI = 36.61) were still in the obese range. At 60 months, men have lost a total of 33.75% of their pre-operative body weight while women have lost a total of 21.50. Diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia were significantly reduced in the sample post-operatively (p <.01). Conclusion: LAGB is a safe and effective surgical procedure for morbidly obese patients resulting in weight loss, BMI decrease and reduction in co-morbid illnesses. Keywords: Bariatric surgery, Adjustable gastric band, Excess weight loss Introduction Obesity is recognized as an international health problem in both developed and developing societies. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the prevalence of obesity in Bahrain was put at 21.2% and 35.2% among males and females respectively. The mean body mass index (BMI) increased dramatically from 24 kg/m 2 to 28 kg/m 2 and from 25.6 kg/m 2 to 29.3 kg/m 2 for male * Correspondence: drahmedalansari@gmail.com 3 MBBCH, MRCSI, MHPE, Department of General Surgery, Bahrain Defense Force Hospital, West Riffa, Bahrain 4 MBBCh, MRCSI, MHPE, University Ambrosiana and University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB T2N 1N4, Canada Full list of author information is available at the end of the article and female respectively between the periods of 1980 to 2008 (World Health Organization 2011). In the USA, it is estimated that over 130 million adults are overweight or obese. Obesity is now considered to be the most common cause of death, resulting in 300,000 deaths annually, approximately 14% of all deaths (World Health Organization 2011). Once an individual becomes obese, the risk of developing a co-morbid illness such as diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), and hyperlipidemia increase significantly (Wang et al. 2008). The risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), for example, has been shown to increase approximately 40-fold as BMI increases from <23 kg/m 2 to> 35 kg/m 2. (Pontiroli 2008). 2013 Al Khalifa et al.; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Al Khalifa et al. SpringerPlus 2013, 2:19 Page 2 of 5 The WHO has recognized the impact of obesity on health and quality of life and thus recommended that studies of health changes associated with weight loss should be a research priority (Leonardo et al. 1997). Other Organizations such as the National Institutes of Health, and surgeons in general, recognize the severity of obesity and its related co-morbid illnesses (Dixon & O Brien 2002). They also acknowledge the impact of obesity on health, functioning, and well-being (Karmali et al. 2011). This has resulted in a worldwide increase in bariatric surgery (Ahroni et al. 2005). Bariatric surgery is a common treatment for morbid obesity. Currently the two most common surgical procedures are laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). LRYGBP is the most common bariatric surgery in the USA whereas in Europe and Australia, LAGB is more common (Korenkov et al. 2007). Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is seen as a simple and safe surgical procedure in individuals with morbid obesity, with satisfactory weight loss, improvement in co-morbidities and significant improvement in quality-of-life (Korenkov et al. 2007). Weight loss post bariatric surgery including laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding seems to have a major impact on obesity and its related illnesses (Kinzl et al. 2007). Further research, especially long-term follow-up studies is required to assess the effectiveness and safety of LAGB. Moreover, further research of under-studied populations such as in the Middle East is required for LAGB. The major purpose of the present study, therefore, was to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on weight reduction, BMI decrease and obesity related illnesses such as diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipedimia in patients in Bahrain in a 5 year follow-up. Methods Patients One hundred and forty-three patients (107 women - 74.8% / 36 men - 25.2%; mean age = 29.9, SD=7.16) underwent LAGB between June 2003 and February 2010. Patient selection was based on the criteria that has been identified by the 1991 NIH Consensus Conference Statement on Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity (Brancatisano et al. 2007). The mean weight pre-operative for women was 118.74 kg with BMI = 45.75 and for men was 137.51 kg with BMI = 45.30. Patients were assessed for co-morbidities, operative time, operative complication, hospital stay, and follow up at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 and 60 months. The mean operative time was 70.2 minutes (SD = 23.5). There were no major complications or patient mortality during the study period. All patients had undergone various conservative approaches (e.g., diet changes) for morbid obesity over a period of twelve or more months without any effect. Procedures Surgical technique - All of the LAGB surgeries were performed by a single gastro-intestinal (GI) surgeon (KA) in one hospital (Bahrain Defense Force Hospital). The procedure involved insertion of four to five trocars in the upper abdomen. The band (Swiss adjustable band) was placed around the fundus of the stomach straight away below the esophagogastric junction via a retrogastric tunnel created using the pars flaccid approach. In some cases, the band was fixed by two or three anterior imprecating gastro-gastric sutures. Postoperative first visit - The initial follow up visit was at one week postoperatively. Reviews continued monthly for the first year, and then reduced to a visit every two months in the following years. All adjustments to the band were performed with 7 8 ml of contrast under fluoroscopic imaging. Co-morbid disease - Patients with the following comorbidity (Type 2 Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, and Hypertension) were identified. For each patient suffering from diabetes, fasting blood sugar and Hba1c was recorded. Patients with dyslipidemia, cholesterol level and low density lipoprotein (LDL) were measured. All hypertensive patients were evaluated according to their blood pressure measurement and medication dosage pre and postoperatively. Co-morbid illness was considered resolved if the patient no longer required medication after surgery and specific laboratory values returned to normal. Improvement of co-morbidity was defined by dose reduction in medication with improvement in specific laboratory values. Treatment of co-morbid conditions was supervised by the relevant specialist. Operative complication - Intra-operative and post operative complications were recorded. Complications in the form of intra-operative bleeding, band intolerance, and wound infection were recorded. No gastric perforation, necrosis, or band slippages were detected. Data analyses Data analyses were conducted with SPSS version 19.0. In addition to descriptive statistics, a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (2-way rep-anova) employing sex (2 levels) and time (7 levels) as independent variables and BMI as the dependent variable was conducted. A second 2-way rep-anova employing sex (2 levels) and time (7 levels) as independent variables and weight (kg) as the dependent variable was conducted. Changes in co-morbidities were analyzed with Fisher s exact test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Al Khalifa et al. SpringerPlus 2013, 2:19 Page 3 of 5 Table 1 BMI, weight and percent weight loss, percent of excess weight loss, compared for men and women pre-operative and six measurements post-operative Time BMI Weight (kg) % weight loss % EWL Sex Mean SD Mean SD n (total 143) Pre-operative Women 45.75 6.71 118.74 16.90 107 Men 45.30 5.77 137.51 19.44 36 3 months post-operative Women 42.01 6.59 108.81 17.39 8.39 17.65 107 Men 40.54 5.07 123.40 18.71 10.28 19.07 36 6 months post-operative Women 40.17 6.50 103.90 17.28 12.49* 26.30* 107 Men 38.39 5.09 116.80 18.60 15.09 27.90 36 9 months post-operative Women 38.88 6.42 100.47 16.81 15.38 32.48 107 Men 36.65 4.82 112.95 20.74 17.94 33.10 36 12 months post-operative Women 37.54* 6.59 97.11 17.13 18.20* 38.47* 107 Men 34.78 4.81 105.86 18.08 22.98 42.70 36 24 months post-operative Women 36.03* 6.84 92.99 17.65 21.69* 45.70* 107 Men 32.85 4.60 100.22 17.32 26.85 50.30 36 60 months post-operative Women 36.61* 8.69 94.58 21.66 21.50* 42.95* 39 Men 30.76 4.85 93.27 19.81 33.75 59.00 13 * p <.05; ** p <.01. Ethics The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Bahrain Defense Force Hospital. Each patient provided informed consent to take part in the study. Results There was significant differences in the first 2-way rep- ANOVA (sex time) with BMI as the dependent variable (Time: Wilk s lambda = 0.156, p <.001; Sex time: Wilk s lambda = 0.922, p <.05) as there was for weight (kg) as the dependent variable (Time: Wilk s lambda = 0.030, p <.001; Sex time: Wilk s lambda = 0.833, p <.01). These results are summarized in Table 1 as are the results of percentage weight loss over the post-operative period. Additionally, the change in BMI from pre-operative to post-operative periods is represented graphically in Figure 1. A close inspection of Table 1 and Figure 1 reveals that both men and women lose weight and reduce their BMIs at a consistent rate. At 3, 6 and 9 months post-operative there are no differences in percent weight loss between men and women with mean weight loss at 8.9%, 13.1% and 16.0% respectively of pre-operative weight and mean % of (EWL) of 17.65%, 27.9%, and 33.1% (Table 1). At 12, 24 and 60 months post-operatively, however, men significantly (p <.05) increase the percentage of weight loss as well as improved their BMI compared to women. This is also evident from Figure 1. At 24 months post-operative, men and women have BMIs of 36.03 and 32.85 with EWL 45.7% and 50.3% respectively, both still in the obese range. Although the sample has had considerable attrition by 60 months, men have achieved a BMI (30.76) that is marginally outside the obese range into the overweight range while women (BMI = 36.61) are still in the obese range. At 60 months, men have lost a total of 33.75% of their pre-operative body weight which is equivalent to 59% of (EWL), while women have lost a total of 21.50% which is representing 42.95% of (EWL). Analyses of the co-morbidities (at 24 months) indicated that the majority of diabetics pre-operative (n=18) were non-diabetic post-operative (n=2 diabetics; Chi Figure 1 BMI for men and women assessed at months post-operative.

Al Khalifa et al. SpringerPlus 2013, 2:19 Page 4 of 5 square = 94.6, Fisher s exact test <.001). Similarly, 19 patients had hyperlipidemia pre-operatively but this number was reduced to 6 post-operatively (Chi square = 73.6, Fisher s exact test <.001). Finally, 14 patients had hypertension pre-operatively and this was reduced to 5 patients post-operatively (Chi square = 96.1, Fisher s exact test <.001). There was, therefore, a significant reduction in all three co-morbidities that were assessed. Discussion This is the first study with a five year follow-up of LAGB in Bahrain. It confirms that LAGB is a safe and effective surgery with a good result in weight reduction and changes in co-morbid illnesses. It also confirms that LAGB can be performed with a minimum of significant complications, which has been confirmed by other studies (1991). Weight loss Weight reduction is the most commonly reported outcome measure of bariatric surgery (Frigg et al. 2004). Bariatric surgery induces a significant loss of fat mass (FM), and in particular of visceral fat, more than of subcutaneous (Koba et al. 2000). However, weight loss after LAGB with an average excess weight loss of 50-60% is less than after gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion (Pontiroli 2008). In the present study, at 60 months, men have lost a total of 33.75% of their pre-operative body weight which is 59% of EWL while women have lost a total of 21.50% which representing 42.96% of EWL. Although the sample has had considerable attrition by 60 months, men have achieved a BMI (30.76) that is marginally outside the obese range into the overweight range while women (BMI = 36.61) are still in the obese range. This sex difference requires further investigation as to why women remain in the obese range and did not continue to lose weight between the period of 24 and 60 months respectively. We speculate that cultural differences (e.g., higher acceptance of obesity in women than in men) may play a role these results. Moreover, pregnancy as well may have contributed to the decreased weight loss for women which were reported between the periods of two to five years respectively in this study. Other studies have reported unexpected pregnancies in previously infertile women due to weight loss (Weiss et al. 2001). The effect of weight loss on obesity-related co-morbidities following LAGB surgery is also a decisive criterion for success in bariatric surgery in addition to weight loss and BMI reduction (Dargent 2004; Frigg et al. 2004). Diabetes mellitus LAGB has a dramatic effect on T2DM due to weight loss induced by gastric banding. This remarkable improvement in diabetes with weight loss, following LAGB surgery is related to the double effect of improved insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta-cell function (Leonardo et al. 1997). Most gastric band studies have proved that between 66% and 96% of patients achieve resolution and /or improvement in terms of normalization of laboratory values and reduction/ or cessation of antidiabetes medication (Kinzl et al. 2007; Omana et al. 2010). Our results are consistent with these findings. Out of eighteen patients, 16 (88%) showed improvement in DM in the period of 2 to 5 years and two patients showed no improvement. Hypertension The high prevalence of hypertension in the morbidly obese is one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular disease (Pontiroli et al. 2002). Reports confirm the reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure following LAGB (Leonardo et al. 1997). Other studies have also shown resolution and/or improvement of hypertension ranging from 47.5% to 86% in obese patients (Kinzl et al. 2007; Omana et al. 2010). Prior to surgery, many patients remain hypertensive despite medical therapy. Several studies have now demonstrated that blood pressure is easier to be controlled post LAGB, and many patients are able to discontinue antihypertensive medication (Titi et al. 2007). In the present study the number of hypertensive patients were reduced from 14 to 5 patients post LAGB surgery representing an improvement in 68.2% of patients with hypertension. Dyslipidemia Increased fasting triglyceride and decrease high-density lipoprotein (HDL) - cholesterol concentration and increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is highly atherogenic and the most common pattern associated with coronary disease (Bacci et al. 2002). Weight loss post LAGB is also associated with improvement in dyslipidemia in the form of reduction of triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein. Our result showed that the number of patients with hyperlipedemia reduced from 19 patients to six patients post-operatively in concordance with other studies that have reported improvement in lipid profile ranging from 63.5% to 95% (Kinzl et al. 2007). Conclusion LAGB is an effective and safe procedure for weight loss in morbidly obese patients. After gastric banding, patients with morbid obesity experience a significant reduction in major co-morbid illness. The benefit of sustained significant weight reduction following LAGB surgery on the serious side-effects of obesity was demonstrated by its impact on diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia. Therefore, the success of LAGB should be judged by

Al Khalifa et al. SpringerPlus 2013, 2:19 Page 5 of 5 the weight loss and the improvement of obesity-associated co-morbidities. Notwithstanding the positive results, further research is required to explore sex differences in the results of LAGB, as well as other cross-cultural differences that may exist. Moreover, continued further longitudinal studies of LAGB will be useful to further evaluate the long term impact of this bariatric procedure. Meanwhile, the results of the present study indicate that LAGB is a safe and effective surgical procedure for morbidly obese patients resulting in weight loss, BMI decrease and reduction in co-morbid illnesses. Competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interest. Authors contribution KA is the surgeon who conducted all the surgeries. He participated in study design and manuscript preparation. CV participated in statistical analysis, interpretation of the data, and manuscript preparation. AA participated in design of the study, data acquisition, and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Omana JJ, Nguyen SQ, Herron D (2010) Comparison of comorbidity resolution and improvement between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic adjustable gastricbanding. Sur Endosc 24:2513 2517 Pontiroli AE (2008) Surgical treatment of obesity: Impact on diabetes and other comorbidities. Nutr, Meta & Cardio 18:1 6 Pontiroli AE, Pizzocri P, Librenti MC et al (2002) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid (grade 3) obesity and its metabolic complications: a three-year study. J Clin Endocrinal Metab 87:3555 3561 Titi M, Jenkins JT, Modak P et al (2007) Quality of life and alteration in comorbidity following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. BMJ 83:487 491 Wang Y, Beydoun MA, Liang L et al (2008) Will all Americans become overweight or obese? Estimating the progression and cost of the US obesity epidemic. Obes Surg 16:2323 2330 Weiss HG, Nehoda H, Labeck B et al (2001) Pregnancies after adjustable gastric banding. Obstet Surg 11:303 306 World Health Organization (2011) NCD country profile. Metabolic risk factor trends. Available at: //www.who.int/entity/nmh/countries/bhr_en.pdf doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-19 Cite this article as: Al Khalifa et al.: Reduction in weight and BMI and changes in Co-morbidities following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedure for morbidly obese patients in Bahrain: a five year longitudinal study. SpringerPlus 2013 2:19. Author details 1 FRCSI, Department of General Surgery, Bahrain Defense Force Hospital, West Riffa, Bahrain. 2 Medical Education Research Unit, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3 MBBCH, MRCSI, MHPE, Department of General Surgery, Bahrain Defense Force Hospital, West Riffa, Bahrain. 4 MBBCh, MRCSI, MHPE, University Ambrosiana and University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB T2N 1N4, Canada. Received: 22 November 2012 Accepted: 17 January 2013 Published: 22 January 2013 References Ahroni JH, Montgomery KF, Watkins BM (2005) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: weight loss, co-morbidities, medication usage and quality of life at one year. Obes Surg 15:641 647 Bacci V, Basso MS, Greco F et al (2002) Modifications of metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors after weight loss induced by laproscopic gastric banding. Obes Surg 12:77 82 Brancatisano A, Wahlroos S, Brancatisano R (2007) Improvement in comorbid illness after placement of the Swedish adjustable gastric band. Surg Obes Rel Dis 17:229 235 Dargent J (2004) Surgical treatment of morbid obesity by adjustable gastric band: the case for a conservative strategy in the case of failure- a 9-year series. Obes Surg 14:986 990 Dixon JB, O Brien PE (2002) Changes in comorbidities and improvements in quality of life after LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg 184:51S 54S Frigg A, Peterli R, Peter T et al (2004) Reduction in co-morbidities 4 years after laparoscopic adjustable gastic banding. Obes Surg 14:216 223 Karmali S, Kadikoy H, Brandt ML et al (2011) What is My goal? expected weight loss and comorbidity outcomes among bariatric surgery patients. Obes Surg 21:595 603 Kinzl JF, Schrattenencker M, Traweger C et al (2007) Quality of life morbidly obese patients after surgical weight loss. Obes Surg 17:229 235 Koba S, Hirano T, Sakaue T et al (2000) Role of small dense low-density lipoprotein in coronary artery disease patients with normal plasma cholesterol levels. J Cardiol 36:371 378 Korenkov M, Shah S, Sauerland S et al (2007) Impact of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on obesity co-morbidity in the medium- and long-term. Obes Surg 17:679 683 Leonardo F, Fragasso G, Rosano GMC (1997) Effect of atenolol on QT interval and dispersion in patients with syndrome X. Am J Cardiol 80:789 790 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement (1991) Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. 9(1):1 20, Mar 25 27 Submit your manuscript to a journal and benefit from: 7 Convenient online submission 7 Rigorous peer review 7 Immediate publication on acceptance 7 Open access: articles freely available online 7 High visibility within the field 7 Retaining the copyright to your article Submit your next manuscript at 7 springeropen.com