Lora-Jean Collett a & David Lester a a Department of Psychology, Wellesley College and

Similar documents
Back-Calculation of Fish Length from Scales: Empirical Comparison of Proportional Methods

Dimitris Pnevmatikos a a University of Western Macedonia, Greece. Published online: 13 Nov 2014.

To link to this article:

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

To link to this article:

Laura N. Young a & Sara Cordes a a Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut

Anne A. Lawrence M.D. PhD a a Department of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada Published online: 11 Jan 2010.

NANCY FUGATE WOODS a a University of Washington

Costanza Scaffidi Abbate a b, Stefano Ruggieri b & Stefano Boca a a University of Palermo

Cognitive Enhancement Using 19-Electrode Z-Score Neurofeedback

Published online: 17 Feb 2011.

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Wild Minds What Animals Really Think : A Museum Exhibit at the New York Hall of Science, December 2011

Marie Stievenart a, Marta Casonato b, Ana Muntean c & Rens van de Schoot d e a Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Universite

Richard Lakeman a a School of Health & Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia. Published online: 02 Sep 2013.

Advanced Projects R&D, New Zealand b Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Online publication date: 30 March 2011

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

EHPS 2012 abstracts. To cite this article: (2012): EHPS 2012 abstracts, Psychology & Health, 27:sup1, 1-357

Online publication date: 08 June 2010

Les McFarling a, Michael D'Angelo a, Marsha Drain a, Deborah A. Gibbs b & Kristine L. Rae Olmsted b a U.S. Army Center for Substance Abuse Programs,

Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA b University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

The Flynn effect and memory function Sallie Baxendale ab a

Randy A. Sansone a b & Michael W. Wiederman c a Departments of Psychiatry and Internal Medicine, Wright State

A Project to Clone Companion Animals Mark Greene Published online: 04 Jun 2010.

Lee N. Johnson a, Scott A. Ketring b & Shayne R. Anderson c a Department of Child and Family Development, University of

Ted H. Shore a, Armen Tashchian b & Janet S. Adams c. Kennesaw State University b Department of Marketing and Entrepreneurship,

9SA, UK Published online: 04 Jan 2008.

Published online: 14 Dec 2007.

Kyle Richard Stephenson a & Cindy M. Meston a a The University of Texas at Austin, Psychology, Austin, Texas, USA

Version of record first published: 25 Apr 2012.

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Life Events, Social Support, and Depression Among Taiwanese Female Homemakers

Kirsten T. Verkooijen a, Pepijn van Hove b & Giel Dik a a Wageningen University. Available online: 27 Dec 2011

Time Perspective Therapy: A New Time-Based Metaphor Therapy for PTSD

Moneyball: The Art of Winning the American Dental Association Membership Renewal Game

Available online: 09 Jun 2011

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Is Public Speaking Really More Feared Than Death?

Testing Lesniaski s Revised Brief Test

Key Knowledge Generation Publication details, including instructions for author and Subscription information:

Inner Stability, Ltd., Bet Shemesh, Israel. Online publication date: 10 March 2011

University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Medical Research Council, Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge

Model 380B DNA Synthesizer Version 1.1

EILEEN K. McMILLEN a, HERBERT W. HELM JR. a & DUANE C. McBRIDE a a Department of Behavioral Sciences, Andrews

Measurement invariance of self-continuity strategies: Comparisons of early adolescents from Brazil, Canada and Colombia

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Memory Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:

Melinda Beckwith a, David Best a, Genevieve Dingle b, Cassandra Perryman b & Dan Lubman a a Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Magalhães, Porto, Portugal

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

Autogynephilia in Women

To link to this article:

Neuropsychological. Justin D. Lane a & David L. Gast a a Department of Special Education, The University of

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Classification without identification in visual search Joan Brand a a

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Andrew Hyland a, David Bradford PhD b & David Bradford PhD b a the Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Andrea W. Clay a b, Mollie A. Bloomsmith a b, M. Jackson Marr b & Terry L. Maple b a Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Memory Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE INTELLIGENCE GILL HASSON LITTLE EXERCISES FOR AN INTUITIVE LIFE

Chapter 10. Published online: 08 Oct 2008.

GUIDANCE FOR SAMPLING ART CLINICS IN COUNTRIES COMBINING SURVEILLANCE OF PRE-TREATMENT HIV DRUG RESISTANCE AND ACQUIRED HIV DRUG RESISTANCE AT 12 AND

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Université de Bretagne-Sud, LSHS, Lorient, France. Online publication date: 10 February 2010 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

THE OPTICAL SOCIETY ONLINE JOURNALS SINGLE SITE LICENSE AGREEMENT

Clinical Supervisor and Counselor Perceptions of Clinical Supervision in Addiction Treatment

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

To link to this article:

South Australia, Adelaide, Australia Published online: 15 Jun To link to this article:

Sarah E. Ullman PhD a, Melissa Ming Foynes MS b & Sharon Shin Shin Tang PhD c a Department of Criminology, Law, & Justice, University of Illinois at

John F. Kihlstrom B.A. a b & William E. Edmonston JR. Ph.D. a a Colgate University, USA. Available online: 20 Sep 2011

To link to this article:

Published online: 11 Sep 2012.

Medical School, Boston, MA

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Hospital to Home: A Geriatric Educational Program on Effective Discharge Planning. Click for updates

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland at College Park, b Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University,

Anne R. Schutte a, Vanessa R. Simmering b & Margaret R. Ortmann a a University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, Wisconsin, USA

Self Assessed Intelligence and Academic Performance

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

David M. Cutton a & Christopher M. Hearon a a Department of Health & Kinesiology, Texas A&M University-

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Link to published version (if available): / X

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

Cage Toys Reduce Abnormal Behavior in Individually Housed Pigtail Macaques Amy L. Kessel & Linda Brent Published online: 04 Jun 2010.

Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada c Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science, University of Guilan,

Michael B. Madson a & Virgil Zeigler-Hill b a The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Memory Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

WHO REPORT ON THE GLOBAL TOBACCO EPIDEMIC,

To link to this article:

Original Research Lay Theories of Suicide in Turkish and American Students

The Amount of Practice Really Matters

Department of Education, Kyungsung University, Busan, Korea b

Curious?, by Todd Kashdan

Gender-Based Differential Item Performance in English Usage Items

Transcription:

This article was downloaded by: [122.34.214.87] On: 10 February 2013, At: 16:46 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjrl20 The Fear of Death and the Fear of Dying Lora-Jean Collett a & David Lester a a Department of Psychology, Wellesley College and Suicide-Prevention and Crisis Service, Buffalo Version of record first published: 04 Nov 2012. To cite this article: Lora-Jean Collett & David Lester (1969): The Fear of Death and the Fear of Dying, The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 72:2, 179-181 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1969.10543496 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/termsand-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages

whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.

Published as a separate and in The Journal of Psychology, 1969, 72, 179-181. THE FEAR OF DEATH AND THE FEAR OF DYING'" 1 Department of Psychology, Wellesley College and Suicide-Prevention and Crisis Service, Buffalo LORA-JEAN COLLETT AND DAVID LESTER A. INTRODUCTION Investigators of attitudes toward death have realized the need for standardized measures of the fear of death (2). Sarnoff and Corwin (4), Boyar ( 1), and Lester (3) have devised measures of the fear of death and investigated the reliability and validity of their measures. However, the items in their scales cover a wide variety of themes: fear of dying, fear of being dead, aversion to funerals, and even worry over the death toll on highways. The purpose of the present study was to devise separate measures of death fears, attempting to distinguish between the fear of death from the fear of the process of dying and to differentiate between these fears depending upon whether they are for oneself or for another. B. METHOD The Ss formed an original sample (A) and a replication sample (B) each consisting of 25 female undergraduates. Thirty-eight statements were composed concerning the four fears: fear of death of self, fear of death of others, fear of dying of self, and fear of dying of others. The number of items in each subscale was to, 10, 8, and to respectively.2 The items were given to the Ss who were required to indicate their agreement or disagreement with each item on a 6-point scale ranging from strong agreement (+3) to strong disagreement (-3). C. RESULTS The scores of the Ss in sample A on each item were correlated with the Received in the Editorial Office, Provincetown, Massachusetts, on April 9, 1969, and published immediately at 35 New Street, Worcester, Massachusetts. Copyright by The Journal Press. 1 Address reprint requests to David Lester, Suicide-Prevention and Crisis Service, 312 Lafayette Building, Buffalo, New York 14-203. 2 A copy of the scale may be obtained from The National Auxiliary Publications Service. Order NAPS Document No. 004-18 from ASIS National Auxiliary Publications Service, c/o CCM Information Sciences, Inc., 22 West 34-th Street, New York, New York 10001; remitting in advance $3.00 for photocopies or $1.00 for microfiche. 179

180 JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY total score for the subscale to which the item belonged. All items whose correlations were not significant at the.10 level of significance (i.e., the correlation was less than.26) were eliminated. Six items were eliminated as a result." The intercorre1ations between the four subscales were calculated and these ranged from.03 to.58 and were, in general, low especially where the type of fear and the referent of the fear differed. For example, fear of dying of self and fear of death of others had a zero correlation (.03 and -.07 in the two samples), whereas fear of dying of others and fear of death of others had a significant but low correlation (.46 and.40 in the two samples, twotailed p <.05).4 A three-way analysis of variance for repeated measures was carried out on the data (5) with the two samples treated as a replication factor. 5 The terms of the analysis involving the replication factor were all nonsignificant. The largest F-ratio was 1.16 (df = 1,48). The Ss showed a significantly high er fear of death than of dying (F = 46.53; df = 1,48; P <.01). They also showed a significantly greater fear when the self was the referent than when another was the referent (F = 14.74; df = 1,48; P <.01). The interaction of death/dying with self/other was also significant (F = 23.78, df = 1,48; P <.01). The mean scores per item for each of the subscales (a measure used to control for the length of each scale) were fear of death of self,.48; fear of death of others,.59; fear of dying of self,.33; and fear of dying of others -.78. D. DISCUSSION The low intercorrclations between the four fears (fear of death of self, fear of dying of self, fear of death of others, and fear of dying of oth ers) indicate the potential usefulness of differentiating these four specific fears rather than indiscriminately grouping all items in the same scale. Such a step would lead to an improvement in available measures of the fear of death. The low correlations may reflect a general death fear which is tapped by all death scales, and in cases where the scales share a common process (death/ dying) or a common referent (self/other) they may reflect this shared object. ;: The test us ed was a one-tailed test of significance. 4 The intercorrelations for the two samples were death self/death others.22 and.26, death self/dying self.24 and.41, death self/dying others.09 and.58, death others/dying self.03 and -.07, death others/dying others.46 and.40, and dying self/dying others.28 and.40. A correlation greater than.39 is necessary for significance at the.05 level (two-tailed test). 5 The interaction terms in analysis of variance were homogeneous (5).

LORA-JEAN COLLETT AND DAVID LESTER 181 Of the four fears, fear of dying of others was least feared. In fact for this subscale the mean score was negative, indicating that Ss faced this topic in general rather than avoiding it. The differences in scores on the four scales are not a result of the different lengths of the four scales, since this was controlled for in the analysis of variance by using the mean score per item for each scale and each S. However, the differences could be a result of differences in the strength of the wording of the items of different scales. Such an occurrence would not be of importance when other variables are being compared to scores on the four scales. E. SUMMARY Scales to assess fear of death of self, fear of dying of self, fear of death of others, and fear of dying of others were devised. The low correlations between scores on these scales indicate the potential usefulness of differentiating between these four fears. REFERENCES 1. BOYAR,]. 1. The construction and partial validation of a scale for the measurement of the fear of death. Diu. A bst., 196+, 25, 204l. 2. LESTER, D. Experimental and correlational studies of the fear of death. Psy chol, Bull., 1967, 67, 27-36. 3.. Fear of death of suicidal persons. Psychol. Rep., 1967, 20, 1077-1078. 4. SARNOFF, 1., & CORWIN, S. M. Castration anxiety and the fear of death. J. Personal., 1959, 27, 274-285. 5. WINER, B. ]. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw- Hill, 1962. Suicide-Prevention and Crisis Service 312 Lafayette Building Buffalo, New York 14203