Canada s Rare Disease Strategy: Pathway to Timely Sustainable Access. CADTH Conference

Similar documents
Canada s Long Journey Toward An Orphan Drug Policy

Canadian Policy to Provide Drugs for Patients with Rare Disorders: Learning from the Best

Aetna Better Health. Specialty Drug Program

Evidentiary and Decision Making Challenges in the Context of Rare Diseases Provincial Program Perspective

Oncology HTA: Canada versus UK experiences. Isabelle Chabot PhD ARCC Conference - Toronto, 12 May 2014

Analyzing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Decisions in Oncology

Patient Group Pathway Model to Accessing Cancer Clinical Trials in Canada

Orphanet Rep rts Series

Cost-effectiveness of Ivacaftor (Kalydeco ) for the treatment of cystic fibrosis in patients age 6 years and older who have the G551D mutation

Greg Cook Associate Director, Market Access, Bristol-Myers Squibb Australia

Drugs for Rare Disorders

Texas Prior Authorization Program Clinical Criteria

Summary A LOOK AT ANTIANDROGEN THERAPIES FOR NONMETASTATIC CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT OPTIONS

Key to Survival - Unlocking access to new treatments

Assessing Cost Effectiveness

Market Access in Hepatitis C Learnings From HIV

Cowen Healthcare Conference

J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference

Access to cancer drugs: The role for a stakeholder alliance?

Paediatric Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

Cancer Immunotherapy from the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Payer Perspectives

Access to newly licensed medicines. Scottish Medicines Consortium

Global Fund Approach to Health System Strengthening

February 13, The Honorable Fred Upton 2183 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC Dear Chairman Upton:

Personalized Medicine*: a health economist s view

OrphaNews Europe: How are orphan medicinal products categorised in Turkey?

Advancing Health Economics, Services, Policy and Ethics

Evidence based assessment of the value of innovation: pricing solutions and prospects

Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Darbepoetin alfa in Cancer Treatment-induced Anaemia

The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified pulmonary hypertension into five different groups: (2)

Clinical Commissioning Policy Statement: Eculizumab for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome. September 2013 Reference: E03/PS(HSS)/a.

2012 CADTH Symposium. April 2012

What does it mean for innovative technologies/medicines? Health economic evaluations and their role in health care decision making.

eculizumab, 300mg concentrate for solution for infusion (Soliris ) SMC No. (436/07) Alexion Pharma UK Ltd

Publication Plan 2017

Appraisals. What is a NICE Technology Appraisal? Logo Here

Pfizer Independent Grants for Learning & Change Track 2- Annual Meetings: Submission Deadlines, Areas of Interest & Educational Goals

VALUE FRAMEWORKS IN HTA Are Value Frameworks Useful in Helping Canadian Cancer Systems Determine Funding for New Therapies?

Managing knowledge to support appropriate use of health technologies: some insights from the UK National Health Service

Using Health Economics to Inform the Development of Medical Devices. Matthew Allsop MATCH / BITECIC

What do we mean by brand value (innovation) within the pharmaceutical sector? Biomedicine Master Program, Lund University, Sweden

Scottish Medicines Consortium

The PROMs Programme in the NHS in England

Should Rare Oncology Treatments be Considered True Orphans?

22nd Annual Heart Failure 2018 an Update on Therapy. Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Contemporary Approach to Treatment

Advancing the Science of Patient Input in Medical Product R&D: Towards a Research Agenda

A Primer on Health Economics & Integrating Findings from Clinical Trials into Health Technology Assessments and Decision Making

LIMITED DISTRIBUTION MEDICATIONS

Corporate Medical Policy. Policy Effective 6/30/2017

Introduction. Rare Disease Research, Health Technology Assessment and Evidence for Reimbursement FORUM

NICE decisions on health care provisions in England

Combination therapy compared to monotherapy for moderate to severe Alzheimer's Disease. Summary

The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified pulmonary hypertension into five different groups: (2)

Cost-effectiveness of elosulfase alfa (Vimizim ) for the treatment of Morquio A Syndrome in patients of all ages.

September 2017 A LOOK AT PARP INHIBITORS FOR OVARIAN CANCER. Drugs Under Review. ICER Evidence Ratings. Other Benefits. Value-Based Price Benchmarks

The time has come to eliminate hepatitis C in Canada Executive Summary

Orphan Regulation. The Academic View

Update from IMI PREFER: Patient preferences in benefitrisk assessments during the medical product lifecycle

NEW SUPPORT MODALITY UNDP UKRAINE EXPERIENCE ZAFAR YULDASHEV PROJECT COORDINATOR UNDP UKRAINE

Back to the future: should we live in a post-qaly world?

SPECIALTY PHARMACY Master Clinical Drug List

Medication Policy Manual. Policy No: dru408. Topic: Site of Care Review Date of Origin: July 10, 2015

Paying for Genomic Testing and Associated Care. Scott Ramsey, MD, PhD FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER

CDEC FINAL RECOMMENDATION

Patients Driving Progress

Bringing Together Clinical, Economic and Patient Reported Outcomes Data Future Of Real World Evidence. March IIeX Health, Philadelphia, PA

The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified pulmonary hypertension into five different groups: (2)

The HTA challenge of medical device assessment: The perspective of assessor

Using the cost effectiveness of allogeneic islet transplantation to inform induced pluripotent stem cell-derived β-cell therapy reimbursement

NHS Western Isles - Involving our Patients: Faster Access to Treatment for Hypertension in Primary Care

Minimizing Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year Gained?

NICE Guidelines for HTA Issues of Controversy

Introduction to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

IT S ALL ABOUT EVIDENCE

Clinical Trials for Rare Diseases in CDER

Value-based frameworks in oncology

CLINICAL REGISTRIES Use and Emerging Best Practices

Value Based Reimbursement Do we want it? Do we already have it? CADTH Symposium Vancouver, April 2011

CADTH CANADIAN DRUG EXPERT COMMITTEE FINAL RECOMMENDATION

Corporate Medical Policy

Rare Disease Day Brussels, 1 March

Everolimus (Votubia) for angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis first line or post surgery

The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified pulmonary hypertension into five different groups: (3)

In keeping with the Scottish Diabetes Group criteria, use should be restricted to those who:

Phase 3 EVOLVE & EXPAND Studies of Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor Combination Show Statistically Significant Improvements in Lung Function and Other Measures

Report generated from MPH Formulary provided by FormularyComplete ( Accessed Formulary Status. TA Number.

Summary A LOOK AT ELAGOLIX FOR ENDOMETRIOSIS JULY 2018

HFMA briefing July Medicines costs in Scotland

Creating Criteria Using Patient Experience for High- Cost & Rare-Use Drugs With Limited Evidence

2/20/2012. New Technology #1. The Horizon of New Health Technologies. Introduction to Economic Evaluation

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Pharmacy and Medical Guideline Updates

The New England Journal of Medicine. A Bronchial Genomic Classifier for the Diagnostic Evaluation of Lung Cancer

Rural Health Initiative

Health Equity Workgroup. January 18, 2018

Transcription:

Canada s Rare Disease Strategy: Pathway to Timely Sustainable Access CADTH Conference Durhane Wong-Rieger, PhD Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders President & CEO

Getting to Sustainable Access What is current status of access to drugs for rare diseases in Canada? What is desirable for patients, prescribers, payers, and producers? What are emerging international best practices? What are the opportunities with Health Canada, CADTH, pcpa, private and public payers? What are the obstacles? What is a sustainable and workable way forward for Canada? 2

Rare Diseases: Unaddressed Public Health Issue But Canada s federation makes national approach a challenge!

# Canadians with Common vs. Rare Diseases 3.5 Milions Affected 3 2.5 2 1.5 1.8 M 2.4 M 1.4 M 2.8 M Cancer Diabetes Heart disease Rare Diseases 1 0.5 0

5 Key Goals of Canada s Rare Disease Strategy 1. Improving early detection and prevention 2. Providing timely, equitable and evidence-informed care 3. Enhancing community support 4. Providing sustainable access to promising therapies 5. Promoting innovative research Canada Rare Disease Strategy Opportunities for Access Feb 2016

Rare Disease Strategy Supports Transforming Therapies into Improved Care Studies designed to promote understanding of effectiveness of interventions in real-world systems of care Range of therapies and health services as co-interventions, such as diet therapy, physiotherapy, family support and counseling, telehealth, and interdisciplinary team care, specialized treatment centers, and care coordination Identify long-term impacts of care, including potential adverse effects Determine how real patients and disease characteristics influences treatment effectiveness; account for clinical heterogeneity 6

7 Traditional HTA Limits Orphan Drug Access HTA OFTEN same as for common drugs RCTs = small samples, short timeframes, surrogate markers High $ development, small population = High $/patient Cost-utility: $/QALY below theoretical $50k threshold Small # = Low budget impact HTA recommends no to most drugs for rare disorders Private drugs plans usually cover (but some do not) Public drug plans usually adopt HTA recommendations HTA limits access in some European countries Half of all orphan drugs evaluated have been rejected by one or more HTA bodies in the UK. Where Cost-Effectiveness NOT norm, reimbursement varies; best = 80% to 100% funding

Canadian (Limited) Access to Rare Disease Drugs Drug Indication recommend Access Replagal Fabry s DNL 3 Yr Research Zavesca Gaucher s DNL DNR/CBC Fabrazyme Fabry s DNL 3 Yr Research Aldurazyme MPS I DNL DNR/ON SP/CBC Somavert Acromegaly DNL DNR/CBC:ON Exjade Iron Overload LWC DNR/LWC AB BC/CBC ON) Nexavar Kidney Cancer DNL CBC Sutent (Renal) Kidney Cancer DNL CBC Sutent (GSIT) GIST LWC CBC Myozyme Pompe s LWC DNR/CBC Elaprase MPS II DNL DNR/CBC Xyrem Narcolepsy DNL DNR Revlimid Myelodysplastic Syndome JODR - DNL CBC DNL = Do not List; LWC/C = List with Criteria/Conditions; LSM List Similar Manner DNR = Do not Reimburse; CBC = ICase-by-case; SP = Special Program; UR = Under Review

Canadian (Limited) Access to Rare Disease Drugs Drug Indication recommend Access Soliris Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria DNL DNR/LWC:ON/CBC:AB MB Naglazyme MPS VI Not Submitted CBC:ON Cayston Cystic Fibrosis LWC UR Ilaris Cryopyrin Associated Syndrome DNL DNR/CBC:ON Kuvan Phenyketonuria DNL DNR/SP:ON Volibris Pulmonary arterial hypertension LWC CBC/LWC:QC PEI Vimizim Morquio (MPS IV) DNL DNR Revolade Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis DNL DNR (LWC:QC) Afinitor Tubersclerosis Complex - Renal DNL DNR/UR/SP:ON Afinitor Tubersclerosis Complex SEGA DNL DNR/UR Firazyr Hereditary Angeiodema LWC/C UR/LWC:QC Somatuline Acromegaly LSM LSM Juxtapid Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia DNL DNR/UR DNL = Do not List; LWC/C = List with Criteria/Conditions; LSM List Similar Manner DNR = Do not Reimburse; CBC = ICase-by-case; SP = Special Program; UR = Under Review

Canadian Limited Access to Rare Disease Drugs Drug Indication recommend Access Opsumit Pulmonary arterial hypertension LWCC UR Mozobil Hematopoietic stem cell mobilizer DNL DNR/SP/LWC Zaxine Hepatic encephalopathy LWC/C LWC:QC/UR Adempas Thromboembolic pulmonary hypertsnsion LWC LWC Soliris Hemolytic uremic syndrome DNL DNR/UR Ofev Signifor Adcirca Elelyso Actemra Remodulin VPRIV Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis LWC UR Cushing s Disease DNL DNR/UR Pulmonary arterial hypertension LSM DNR/UR Gaucher s Disease DNL UR Polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis LWC LWR/UR Pulmonary arterial hypertension DNL DNR/CBC:ON Gaucher s Disease LWC DNR/SP:ON BC/UR DNL = Do not List; LWC/C = List with Criteria/Conditions; LSM List Similar Manner DNR = Do not Reimburse; CBC = Case-by-case; SP = Special Program; UR = Under Review

Int l HTA Limits Equity of Access Australia (PBAC) Canada (CADTH) England (NICE/AGNSS) France (HAS) Scotland (SMC) Kalydeco: cystic fibrosis with G551D mutation Recommend (March 2014) Restricted (March 2013) Funded NHS; review Clinical Priorities Advisory Group (2012) Recommed (Nov. 2012) Not recommend (Jan 2013); via Orphan Drug Fund Soliris: paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinu ria Not recommend (Mar 2009); eligible Life Savings Drug Program (2010) Not recommend (Feb. 2010) Not recommend (Feb. 2010) Recommend (Oct. 2007) Not recommend (July 2011) Elaprase: Hunter syndrome (MPS II) Not recommend (Nov. 2007); eligible Life Savings Drug Program (2012) Not recommend (Dec. 2007) (Not reviewed by NICE) Recommend (March 2007) Not recommend (July 2007) 11

Evidence about drug Balancing Timely Access and Certainty of Benefits/Risks We want certainty about safety and benefits of drugs We need timely access to drugs for unmet & urgent needs Time 12

Increasing Number of Patients Adaptive pathways Aim to provide timely access to new medicines by balancing medical need with evolving information on the benefit risk FULL APPROVAL Intensive monitoring of patients Additional indication(s) Intensive monitoring of patients Initial approval of niche indication Time 13

Key Obstacles MAPPs: perception that earlier access for (some) patients with limited data could lead to safety problems and undermine public trust More drugs for smaller patient subpopulations => not sustainable; unwillingness to pay for early access with limited data Need tools to limit access to approved subset (avoid off- label use) Practicalities and cost of implementing flexible or outcome based reimbursement strategies Extra work for regulators, HTA bodies, and payer due to repeat cycles of assessment and negotiations with sponsors Need capacity building and support for all stakeholders in order to fully integrate contribution of patients and patient organizations across drug life cycle

The real challenges seem to be more associated with efficacy than with safety Major reasons for late-stage failures (n = 73) Comment Efficacy (vs. placebo) 50% 50% Efficacy is the most frequent reason for failures in late-stage development This is not related to limited Safety (vs. placebo) Confirmation of early safety concerns Non classifiable 8% 23% 31% as 22 examples of top-10 pharmacos reveal Efficacy failures are largely influenced/ enhanced by Novelty of mechanism of action (MoA) Lack of differentiation Efficacy Safety 3% 16% 19% Objectivity of clinical trial endpoint Modality Novel MoA bears double failure risk Less objective endpoints (e.g. PROs) on average lead to ~10% increased failure risk 15

Lifecycle Approach with Patient Input & Post-Market/Real World Data Payer: Budget Impact; Access Criteria; R-W Data Collection Researcher/Clini cian: Disease Knowledge; Drug Discovery; Treatment Guidelines Patient Input HTA: Comparison Benefits, Risks, Cost w/alternatives; Place in Therapy Company: Clinical Trials & Outcome Measures; biomedical, clinical, PROs, Real-World Impact Regulator: Approval on Benefits-Risks- Uncertainties; Use & Real- World Monitoring 16

17 Thank You! Durhane Wong-Rieger, PhD President Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders www.raredisorders.ca 416-969-7435 durhane@sympatico.ca