DETERMINING WHETHER AN ACTIVITY IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL REGULATIONS

Similar documents
IRB Policy 5 Research Activities

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Research That Must Be Reviewed by the IRB

Determination of Human Subjects Research

QA Program Evaluation Research Tool CF-195, Effective

OHRP - Guidance on Research Involving Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE

Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program

Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research:

Kate Gallin Heffernan (Chair) (617) Mark A. Borreliz (617)

DEFINING RESEARCH WITH HUMAN SUBJECTS - SBE

SALISBURY UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESEARCH APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

IRB for Humanists. Naomi E. Coll, MPH, CPH, CIP Manager of Research Integrity

TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE

IRB FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. 1. Who must apply for human subjects review through the IRB (Institutional Research Board)?

Human Subject Institutional Review Board Proposal Form

POLICIES GOVERNING PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH AND TEACHING AT WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW

Office of Research Compliance. Research Involving Human Subjects

IRBMED Seminar Series

EXEMPT RESEARCH. Investigators should contact the IRB Office if there are questions about whether an amendment consists

Q5 If there is more than one faculty researcher, then enter co-researchers information (Name, address)

Investigator s Handbook for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Institutional Review Board Revised February 23, 2017

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

MDCH IRB REVIEW APPLICATION Authority: Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46

IRB review of device studies

Protection of Research Subjects: The IRB Process

COMMON RULE 2019 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JANUARY 21, 2019

Research Involving Human Subjects: Ethics, Process, and Guidance for Streamlining IRB Review

RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS

Human Subjects Protection Specialist October 22 nd, 2010

Revised August 28, 2018

Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures

Student Guide To Ethics Review For Research Involving Human Subjects

Compliance. TODAY November Social media savvy Think before you tweet! an interview with Anne Van Dusen. See page 16

HSPC/IRB Description of Research Form (For research projects involving human participants)

IRB GRAND ROUNDS SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH: NEED TO KNOW

Final Rule Material: New and Revised Definitions

To IRB, or Not to IRB

Human Research Participant Protection Program

Institutional Review Board Policy and Guidelines Primary Author: Dennis M. Sullivan, MD, MA (Ethics) (Revised: 2/5/2018)

REGIS UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home) Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home)

APPLICATION/RESEARCH PROTOCOL REVIEW FORM

Summary of Changes to Human Subjects Regulations: Effective January 21, 2019

OVERVIEW OF THE 2017 VFD PROGRAM

Levels of IRB Review

The AAA statement on Ethnography and Institutional Review Boards (2004) provides a useful working definition:

INOVIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. INVESTIGATOR CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS

MC IRB Protocol No.:

Student Handbook: Making Sense of Human Subjects Research

Final Rule Material: Changes to Exempt Categories

Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy for Positions Requiring COMMERCIAL DRIVER S LICENSE (CDL)

POL HR CDL DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING PLAN Page 1 of 8 POLICY. See Also: POL-0409-HR; PRO HR; PRO HR Res

Self-Evaluation for Compliance with Section 504 Accessibility Requirements for Persons with Disabilities

REQUIRED INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) EDUCATIONAL READING FOR FLETCHER SCHOOL RESEARCHERS APPLYING FOR EXEMPTION FROM IRB

TITLE: Obtaining Informed Consent of Non-English Speakers SOP #: CON-101 (formerly SM-507) Page: 1 of 7 Effective Date: 1/14/2016

October 2017 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL

Guidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices

Navigating the Regulatory Requirements of Pediatric Research Nathan Lee, CIP Vice Chair, Schulman IRB

Crossing the Line. When does innovative therapy become research?

(City, State, Zip Code)

DATE ISSUED: 2/4/ of 6 LDU DHE(LOCAL)-X

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and

Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans

VACCINES FOR CHILDREN (VFC) DISCREPANCY OR MISUSE POLICY

Institutional Review Board. Policies and Procedures

TSDR Pharmacy Inc. dba brandmd Skin Care 11/9/17

BOARD CERTIFICATION PROCESS (EXCERPTS FOR SENIOR TRACK III) Stage I: Application and eligibility for candidacy

Guidance on Benign Behavioral Interventions: Exempt Category Three 45 CFR (d)(3)(i)

Subpart 4.06 Mandatory Chemical Testing Following Serious Marine Incidents Involving Vessels in Commercial Service

Preparing a US FDA Medical Device 510(K) Submission

Texasmutual.com 844-WORKSAFE ( ) January 2016 Worksafetexas.com 1

MIAMI CHILDREN S HOSPITAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure

GUIDELINE FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program Guide, Curriculum & Observation Log

Some of the benefits to your entity as a member of the Local Government Testing Consortium (LGTC), are as follows:

Dallas ISD TERM CONTRACTS

Collegeof Central Florida Protection of Human Subjects

Last Name First name Academic degrees. Professional titles and/or work position within your home institution

CLINTON-ESSEX-WARREN-WASHINGTON BOCES Drug and Alcohol Testing. Champlain Valley Educational Services P.O. Box 455 Plattsburgh, NY

SUBJECT: SJMHS Institutional Review Board(s): Vulnerable Populations - Research Involving Prisoners

BARNARD COLLEGE Application for the Approval of the Use of Human Subjects in Research

Veterans Certified Peer Specialist Training

Human Subjects Research: Overview. Colleen Kohashi and Tani Prestage Office for the Protection of Human Subjects (OPHS) February 26, 2016

PHONE SCRIPTS, QUESTIONNAIRES AND WAIVERS OF DOCUMENTATION. Bertha delanda, CIP IRB Training Specialist January 2012

Certified Peer Specialist Training Application

Drug-Free Workplace Program

Taylor C. Wallace, PhD, CFS, FACN, March 22, 2018

DISCLOSURE OF ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE/DRUG ABUSE RECORDS. This Policy describes permissible disclosures of Alcohol and Substance/Drug Abuse Records.

Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program

NORTH AMERICAN SERVICES GROUP DRUG & ALCOHOL TESTING POLICY

ALCOHOL AND DRUG-TESTING OF BUS DRIVERS REGULATION

Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration San Francisco District 1431 Harbor Bay Parkway Alameda, CA Telephone: 510/

*Explain the purpose & role of the IRB *Explain the IRB Review Categories *Discuss the potential risks to research participants

B. Tasks and Procedures where employees, students or contractors can be exposed to bloodborne pathogens:

Establishing Rules for: Medical Device Reports (803) & Correction and Removal Reports (806)

Day care and childminding: Guidance to the National Standards

Transcription:

Page 1 of 6 Human Research Protection Page: 1 of 6 DETERMINING WHETHER AN ACTIVITY IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL REGULATIONS DESCRIPTION Any proposed activity involving contact with live persons, which involves UC faculty, staff, students, and qualifies as human subjects research must be submitted for IRB review and approval prior to initiation of the activity. RESPONSIBILITY The IRB Chair for the Medical Board and the IRB Chair Social and Behavioral Board are responsible for determining whether the research constitutes human subjects research. PROCESS Questions about the nature of an activity as potential human subjects research should be discussed with the Chair of the Institutional Review Board before beginning the activity. All human subjects research must be submitted to the UC IRB for review prior to initiation of the activity. If the answer is yes to both of these questions, the activity must be submitted to the IRB for further evaluation prior to initiation of the activity.: 1. Is the activity a systematic investigation or clinical investigation, including protocol development, testing, and evaluation, designed to contribute to generalized knowledge? 2. Does the activity involve living individuals about whom the investigator obtains data through intervention or interaction 7 with the individual, or obtains identifiable private information? In addition, if the answer is yes to any of the following questions the activity must be submitted to the IRB for further evaluation prior to initiation of the activity. 1. Does the activity involve the use of a drug (including an approved drug or an overthe-counter drug), other than the use of an approved drug in the course of medical practice?

Page 2 of 6 Human Research Protection Page: 2 of 6 2. Does the activity involve the use of a medical device (including an approved medical device), other than the use of an approved medical device in the course of medical practice? (Note that medical devices generally include devices intended for the use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in humans or other animals, and devices intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of humans or other animals. 3. Will data be submitted to the FDA or held for their inspection? To submit the activity for review, investigators must complete and submit the UC IRB form Determining Whether a Proposed Activity is Human Research According to DHHS or FDA Regulatory Definitions along with any other relevant information (e.g. grant, protocol, data collection tools, letters of collaboration) required to evaluate the activity, prior to initiation of the activity. RESPONSIBILITIES The IRB office staff will review the submission for completeness and assign to an IRB Chair for review. The submission will be reviewed by the IRB Chair to determine if it contains enough information to make a determination of whether the project involves human subjects research. If not enough information is provided, the chair will request additional information from the investigator. Once sufficient information is provided, the Chair will make a determination whether the activity is human subjects research and requires IRB review. Determinations will be made in accordance with DHHS (45CFR 46.102) and FDA (21CFR50.3) regulations and applicable state and local laws. Each determination and the basis of its decision will be documented. Activities determined to require IRB approval would be referred to as not human subjects research. If the activity is determined to constitute human subjects research, the Investigator will be informed in writing to submit the full protocol to the IRB for review prior to initiating the activity. If the work is determined not to constitute human subjects research, the Investigator will be notified in writing of the decision. CONDUCTING HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH WITHOUT IRB APPROVAL It can be very difficult to determine what constitutes human subjects research. In addition to clinical research studies, regulatory requirements to protect human subjects apply to a much broader range of research than many investigators realize, and researchers using human specimens and/or data are often unsure about how regulations apply to their research. Investigators are highly encouraged to contact the IRB office for guidance on determining if an activity constitutes human subjects research requiring IRB approval.

Page 3 of 6 Human Research Protection Page: 3 of 6 If the IRB receives a protocol for review after a human subjects research study has been completed, without prior IRB approval, the protocol will not be reviewed. The Investigator will be notified of the regulatory requirements requiring prospective IRB approval of human subjects research. The Investigator will be informed that the data may not be used for any publications, presentations, thesis, or dissertation requirements. The unapproved human subjects research activity will be investigated as described in Policy VII.03-Investigating Allegations of Non-Compliance in Human Subjects Research, and appropriate actions will be taken. EXAMPLES OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH: 1. Clinically oriented research. a. Mechanisms of human disease b. Therapeutic interventions c. Clinical trials d. Development of new technologies e. Research using human specimens and/or data including i. Bodily materials, such as cells, blood or urine, tissues, organs, hair or nail clippings, from living individuals who are individually identifiable to the investigator(s), even if these materials were collected by others; ii. Residual diagnostic specimens from living individuals that are individually identifiable to the investigator(s), including specimens obtained for routine patient care that would have been discarded if not used for research; iii. Private information, such as medical information, about living individuals that is individually identifiable to the investigator(s), even if the information was not specifically collected for the study in question. This category includes retrospective chart reviews. 2. Epidemiologic and behavioral studies that generate data by means of questionnaires, observation, studies of existing records, and experimental designs involving exposure to some type of stimulus or intervention 3. Outcomes research and health services research studies designed to measure the outcome of medical treatment

Page 4 of 6 Human Research Protection Page: 4 of 6 DEFINITIONS The IRB shall use the following definitions to determine whether an activity shall qualify as human subjects research requiring IRB review and approval: 1. Human Subjects Research shall include all activities which either: a. Meet the Department of Health and Human Services definition of research as any systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge (45 CFR 164.501); and which involve person(s) who qualify as human subjects within the meaning of relevant regulations of the US Food and Drug Administration as any living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains; (i) (ii) Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or Identifiable private information or data from which the identity of the subject is or may readily be ascertained by the investigator (45 CFR 46.102(f)). -OR- b. Qualify under the Food and Drug Administration regulations as an Investigational use" involving any use of an approved product in the context of a clinical study protocol (21 CFR 312.3(b)) and which involves one or more human subjects as defined in relevant regulations as individual(s) who are or become participant(s) in research, either as recipient(s) of a test article or as a control. A subject may be either a healthy human or a patient (21 CFR 56.102(e); 812.3(p)). c. Research activities subject to this policy shall include clinical investigations regulated by the Food and Drug Administration under sections 45 CFR 505(i) and 520(g), including any use of a drug, other than the use of an approved drug in the course of medical practice, and clinical investigations regulated by the Food and Drug Administration under section 45 CFR 520(g), including any use of a medical device, other than the use of an approved medical device in the course of medical practice. 2. Systematic Investigation typically involves a predetermined method for studying a specific topic, answering a specific question(s), testing a specific hypothesis(es), or developing theory. Examples: observational studies, interview or survey studies, group comparison studies, program evaluation, test development, interventional research.

Page 5 of 6 Human Research Protection Page: 5 of 6 3. Clinical investigation means any experiment that involves a test article and one or more human subjects, 4. Designed or contribute to generalizable knowledge typically requires that results (or conclusions) of the activity are intended to be extended beyond a single individual or an internal program. Examples: Activities where there is an intent to publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal or to present at a regional or national meeting, as well as, theses or dissertation projects conducted to meet the requirements of a graduate degree. 5. Individual is a person who is or becomes a participant in research, either as a recipient of the test article or as a control. The individual may be either a healthy person or a patient 6. Intervention includes both physical procedures (e.g. venipuncture) and manipulations of the living individuals or the living individuals' environments. 7. Interaction includes communication or interpersonal contact between the investigator (or research team) and the living individual. Examples: interviews, questionnaires, surveys, observations, manipulation of subject behavior, diet, or environment, physical measurements, specimen collection (e.g. blood tissue), administration of experimental drugs or devices. 8. Information is considered Identifiable if (1) the identity of the individual from whom the information was obtained is ascertained or may be readily ascertained by the investigator; or (2) the identify of the individual from whom the information was obtained is associated or may be readily associated with the information. 9. Private information includes information about behavior that occurs in a context in which the individual can reasonably expect that no observation or recording is taking place or information that has been provided for specific purposes that the individual can reasonably expect will not be made public (e.g., medical record, employee or student records). Examples of individual identifiers include the subject's name, address, phone number, social security number, medical record number, student or employee identification number, or in some cases, the combination of data such that they can identify a single individual through deductive reasoning. For example, data about employer, job title, age and gender may not individually identify a subject, but when combined, could in certain cases, identify a specific individual.

Page 6 of 6 Human Research Protection Page: 6 of 6 If the information cannot be linked to a living individual, or is considered public or is given with the expectation that it will be made public and that it will be linked to the individual (e.g. biography, news story), then it would not be considered private identifiable information. For example, use of a publicly available data set that does not contain any identifiers or codes linked to individuals does not involve human subjects research. However, use of a publicly available data set that does contain identifiers or codes linked to individuals does involve human subjects research (that would be considered exempt). Applicable, Document(s): 45 CFR 46.101(a) 45 CFR 46.102(d) 45 CFR 46.102(f) 45 CFR 46.102(f)(1) 45 CFR 46.102(f)(2) 21 CFR 50.1 21 CFR 50.3(a) 21 CFR 50.3(c) 21 CFR 50.3(g) 21 CFR 50.3(j) 21 CFR 56.101 21 CFR 56.102(c) 21 CFR 56.102(l) Adoption Date: Created by: Date of Revision: Revised By: Summary of Revision: 03/2005 M. Linke 07/2007 D. Oneill Updated IRB office terminology. Date_Signature_