The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Inc. (NAACCR) Interoperability Activities

Similar documents
NPCR-AERRO S PARTNERSHIP WITH IHE: ENSURING CANCER S CONNECTIVITY WITH THE EMR/EHR

Rebooting Cancer Data Through Structured Data Capture GEMMA LEE NAACCR CONFERENCE JUNE, 2017

APHL-PHDSC Collaboration Standards in the laboratory realm

Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) Structured Data Capture (SDC) Use Case: Cancer Registry Reporting

A Paradigm Shift- NAACCR s Volume V Standard and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Electronic Cancer Checklists

What is the Connection? EHDI and HIT. Lura Daussat, MPH April 15, 2014

National Program of Cancer Registries Advancing E-cancer Reporting and Registry Operations (NPCR-AERRO): Activities Overview

Public Health Meaningful Use: Views from the Field. HIMSS HIE Roundtable May 19, 2011

The findings and conclusions in this presentation

Demonstrating Collect once, Use Many Assimilating Public Health Secondary Data Use Requirements into an Existing Domain Analysis Model

HL7 EHR Interoperability WG. Project Planning. Facilitators: Gora Datta, Gary Dickinson 14 October 2009

IHE Quality, Research and Public Health Technical Framework Supplement. Early Hearing Care Plan (EHCP) Trial Implementation

Inside IHE: Cardiology Webinar Series 2018

HL7 s Version 2 standards and submission to immunization registries

Designing Clinical Concept Models for a Nationwide Electronic Health Records System For Japan

North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR)

ADA Standards Committee on Dental Informatics Working Group Structure

Electronic Support for Public Health Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS)

HL7 EHR Interoperability WG. Projects in Progress. Co-Facilitators: Gora Datta, Gary Dickinson 4 October 2010

Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program

Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program

Ammenwerth E, Hörbst A, Hayn D, Schreier G, eds. Proceedings of the ehealth2013. May 23-24; Vienna, Austria. OCG; 2013.

Moving Family Health History & Genetic Test Result Data into the Electronic Health Record for Clinical Decision Support

Cancer as a Disease. Linda D. Rego, CTR March 2009

Quality requirements for EHR Archetypes

Health IT and What IT Means

CLINICIAN-LED E-HEALTH RECORDS. (AKA GETTING THE LITTLE DATA RIGHT) Dr Heather Leslie Ocean Informatics/openEHR Foundation

Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise The IHE Initiative Worldwide IHE Europe Karima Bourquard IHE Europe user Cochair

Redwood Mednet Connecting California to Improve Patient Care 2012 Conference. Michael Stearns, MD, CPC, CFPC HIT Consultant

Joint ADA and Health Level 7 Collaboration On Electronic Dental Attachments

Semantic Alignment between ICD-11 and SNOMED-CT. By Marcie Wright RHIA, CHDA, CCS

Purpose. Encourage standard exchange of data between two key public health partners

Standards for Cancer Registries, Volume I. Data Exchange Standards and Record Descriptions

Immunization Reporting and Clinical Decision Support via SOA. Mike Suralik Project Manager HLN Consulting, LLC. June 4, 2009

7th National Conference

Common Data Elements for Clinical Documentation and Secondary Use: Diabe-DS Proof-of-Concept for Collect Once, Use Many Times

Scenario Vendor Products Standards

Health informatics Digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) including workflow and data management

Health Information Exchange (HIE) in practical use in the Veneto Region

An architecture description method for Acknowledged System of Systems based on Federated Architecture

2010 Cancer Data Collection Updates: Standards Volume II, Introduction. What s New for 2010

ecall Days Hamburg I_HeERO Member State Update EeIP 19 th 20 th September 2017 Andy Rooke Technical Implementing Officer I_HeERO ERTICO

DICOM WG 22 Dentistry

National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. October 5, 2011

SAGE. Nick Beard Vice President, IDX Systems Corp.

Automated UICC-TNM Staging

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Using SNOMED CT Codes for Coding Information in Electronic Health Records for Stroke Patients

From EHR Immunization Requirements to a Validation and Recognition Program

I, Mary M. Langman, Director, Information Issues and Policy, Medical Library Association

BMC Cancer. Open Access. Abstract. BioMed Central

American Society for Automation in Pharmacy January 25, 2013

Federal-State Response to the Opioid Crisis. Session 48 February 12, 2019

Combining Archetypes with Fast Health Interoperability Resources in Future-proof Health Information Systems

Setting the stage for change: upgrading the physician cancer case reporting application in New York

Data Harmonization Efforts Across the Cancer Staging System. Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR AJCC Technical Specialist

Notes for slide 2 Welcome to today s training webinar. We appreciate everyone taking time today to hear our presentations. We are very excited to fina

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening (2003/878/EC)

Measure Specifications Measure Description

ADA Standards Committee on Dental Informatics Working Group Structure

PatientLink MyLinks FHIR. Page 1 of 8. HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2019

Pharmacotherapy selection system supports shared clinician-patient decision-making in diabetes treatment

Pediatric Oral Healthcare Exploring the Feasibility for E-Measures December 2012

EHR Developer Code of Conduct Frequently Asked Questions

Grants to Increase Organ Donation

Lessons Learned from Meaningful Use Implementation. Cynthia L. Bero, MPH Partners HealthCare May 19, 2011

HL7 CDS Project Update

Quality ID #250 (NQF 1853): Radical Prostatectomy Pathology Reporting National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

OC TOBER 19, Quality Payment Program Overview

Investigating implementing CEN with HL7 V3 and SNOMED CT Final Report

Fourth National ACO Summit June 14, 2013 With Information from the Indiana Health Information Exchange

George Cernile Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Toronto, ON. Carol L. Kosary National Cancer Institute Rockville, MD

Connecting for Health s Record Locator Service in Mendocino

2018 IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE: WHAT S NEW IN STAGING FOR 2018?

New Opportunities in Cancer Research National Academy of Sciences Advancing Health Research in Poland and the United States December 3, 2009

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

QPP/MIPS Success with Longitudinal Quality Measurement

USEFULNESS OF ONTOLOGIES FOR RARE DISEASES

cagrid, cabig, CVRG and NCIBI Joel Saltz MD, PhD Director Center for Comprehensive Informatics

Common Data Elements: Making the Mass of NIH Measures More Useful

WELSH INFORMATION STANDARDS BOARD

The Impact of E-Path Technology on the Ontario Cancer Registry. Operations

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for Program Year 2018

Standardize and Optimize. Trials and Drug Development

The Electronic Oral Health Record

How to code rare diseases with international terminologies?

Message Mapping Guide (MMG) Development Update: Status of Work, Lessons Learned, and Enhancements

DENOMINATOR: All melanoma pathology reports for primary malignant cutaneous melanoma

IHE Cardiology Technical Framework Supplement. Cardiac Imaging Report Content (CIRC) Trial Implementation

A Trial Implementa.on of a High Density Health Informa.on Exchange Standard: Are We Ready for Coordinated Care in High Impact Condi.ons?

Abstract. Introduction. Providers stand to lose $1.15 billion in CMS reimbursements under MU

SIM HIT Assessment. Table 1: Practice Capacity to Support Data Elements

Disclosure. From the London Times... What Is Meaningful Use? 11/7/2011. Overview. The Road to Meaningful Use and Beyond

FHA CONNECT and Prescription Drug Monitoring

Public Health Response to HCV in Oregon: Need for Screening and Treatment. Ann Thomas, MD, MPH Acute and Communicable Disease Prevention

Design Issues for Electronics Health Records Using Cloud Computing Technologies

Leveraging Electronic Pathology Reporting in Cervical Cancer Epidemiology: Determinants of Invasive Diagnoses in Kentucky

The MetroHealth System. Creating the HIT Organizational Culture at MetroHealth. Creating the HIT Organizational Culture

CLAMP-Cancer an NLP tool to facilitate cancer research using EHRs Hua Xu, PhD

WG 2 Informatics Standards in Pathology. Dr Christel DANIEL (IHE Anatomic Pathology co-chair) Jacques KLOSSA (DICOM WG26 co-chair) Bernd BLOBEL

Transcription:

The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Inc. (NAACCR) Interoperability Activities Lori A. Havener, CTR Program Manager of Standards Public Health Data Standards Consortium 2008 Annual Meeting

Outline Priority and Structure Work Group Activities National Health IT Initiatives Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise

NAACCR s Number One Priority Achieve syntactic and semantic interoperability of cancer registration standards with national standards.

Why? Increased emphasis on electronic health records (EHR) 2004 State of the Union Address Within 10 years complete healthcare information is available for most Americans Standards for electronic transmissions are being set We want to be at the table to ensure cancer registry needs are met

Why? (continued) Over 20 years of experience Standards Volumes I and II Historical data

Interoperability Ad Hoc Committee Work Groups

Interoperability Ad Hoc Committee Structure

Semantic Data WG Goal: : Achieve semantic interoperability of cancer registry data items with national standards Activities : date format, National Provider Identifiers, Race, cadsr

Dates Data Items Old Format - MMDDYYYY Extra information: e.g. 88888888 New Format YYYYMMDD Flag fields

cadsr-naaccr Data Items Ad Hoc Work Group Purpose quality control NAACCR Data Items in cadsr (cancer Data Standards Repository) cabig cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid Information network - cancer community - to share data and knowledge

Pathology Data Work Group Goal: : Develop messaging standards to facilitate the transmission of electronic pathology reports from anatomical pathology laboratories to cancer registries Activities: Developed implementation guide for HL7 version 2.3.1 Messaging Workbench (MWB) Upgrade of implementation guide to HL7 Version 2.5.1

Clinical Data Work Group Goal: : Explore alternate mechanisms or messages to transmit and receive (within and outside the cancer registry community) the cancer abstract (Volume II) to ensure consistency with national standards-related related organizations Activities: HL7 Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) Pilot project: hospital to central Protocol Transformation tools Implementation Diagram Time Line Implementation Guide

National Health Information Technology (HIT) Initiatives

Tsunami of Acronyms

National HIT Initiatives Avalanche of information; multiple organizations Where to put our energy / efforts Takes time We re on a learning curve

National HIT Initiatives CAP PERC (College of American Pathologist Pathology Electronic Reporting Committee) HITSP ( Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel) HL7 (Health Level Seven) IHE (Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise) PHDSC (Public Health Data Standards Consortium)

Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) Cancer Registry Pathology Reporting Content Profile IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) Domain IHE Anatomic Pathology (AP) Domain

IHE Cancer Registry Pathology Reporting Content Profile Developed from: NAACCR Standards for Cancer Registries, Volume V, Pathology Laboratory Electronic Reporting, Version 2.1 NAACCR Electronic Pathology Reporting Guidelines

IHE Cancer Registry Pathology Reporting Content Profile PCC Domain Initial proposal Comment period Move to AP Domain

IHE Cancer Registry Pathology Reporting Content Profile AP Domain: Based in Europe In-person meeting in Portugal, October 2008 Pathology Integration Profile Accepted cancer registry profile 2009-2010 2010 implementation cycle

IHE Cancer Registry Pathology Reporting Content Profile AP Domain - Differences between two profiles AP profile is restricted to data exchange within a single institution Cancer Registry profile allows data exchange between multiple entities within or outside of an institution

IHE Cancer Registry Pathology Reporting Content Profile AP Domain - Differences between two profiles AP profile is HL7 version 2.5.1 Cancer Registry profile is HL7 version 2.3.1 Data element requirements

Thank you! Lori A. Havener, CTR Program Manager of Standards NAACCR, Inc. lhavener@naaccr.org www.naaccr.org