Long term outcomes of posterior leaflet folding valvuloplasty for mitral valve regurgitation

Similar documents
Chordae replacement versus leaflet resection in minimally invasive mitral valve repair

The Edge-to-Edge Technique f For Barlow's Disease

Less Invasive Reoperations for Aortic and Mitral Valve Disease. Peter Bent Brigham Hospital 1913

Technical aspects of robotic posterior mitral valve leaflet repair

Χειρουργική Αντιμετώπιση της Ανεπάρκειας της Μιτροειδούς Βαλβίδας

What s New in Mitral Valve Repair?

Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease. Very Long-Term Survival and Durability of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Valve Prolapse

Isolated Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Depressed Left Ventricular Function

The use of mitral valve (MV) repair to correct mitral

A near 100% repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achievable in a reference center: Implications for future guidelines

Bicuspid aortic root spared during ascending aorta surgery: an update of long-term results

Quality Outcomes Mitral Valve Repair

The Ross Procedure: Outcomes at 20 Years

Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Regurgitation Due to Degenerative Disease

Mitral valve (MV) repair is preferred over replacement. Is Mitral Valve Repair Superior to Replacement in Elderly Patients?

Degenerative mitral valve disease is the leading cause of

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair suggests earlier operations for mitral valve disease

Kinsing Ko, Thom de Kroon, Najim Kaoui, Bart van Putte, Nabil Saouti. St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

Influence of Atrial Fibrillation on Outcome Following Mitral Valve Repair

Long-Term Assessment of Mitral Valve Reconstruction With Resection of the Leaflets: Triangular and Quadrangular Resection

Myxomatous degeneration of the mitral valve is the

Posterior leaflet prolapse is the most common lesion seen

Surgical Repair of the Mitral Valve Presenter: Graham McCrystal Cardiothoracic Surgeon Christchurch Public Hospital

Long-term results (22 years) of the Ross Operation a single institutional experience

Lifting posterior mitral annuloplasty for enhancing leaflet coaptation in mitral valve repair: midterm outcomes

Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC FACC, FESC President Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons Associate Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery King Abdulaziz

Minimally Invasive Aortic Surgery With Emphasis On Technical Aspects, Extracorporeal Circulation Management And Cardioplegic Techniques

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is an insufficiency of

KANEKO T et al. Mitral Valve Repair. Evolution and Revolution Tsuyoshi Kaneko, MD; Lawrence H Cohn, MD

Research Article Transapical Approach for Mitral Valve Repair during Insertion of a Left Ventricular Assist Device

CARDIOCHIRURGIA MINI-INVASIVA: INVASIVA: efficacia per il paziente efficienza per la sanita. Dott. Davide Ricci

Feasibility and Intermediate Term Outcome of Repair of Prolapsing Anterior Mitral Leaflets With Artificial Chordal Replacement in 152 Patients

Comparison of outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for posterior, anterior and bileaflet prolapse

Evolution of the concept and practice of mitral valve repair

Does Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Affect Long-term Results after Mitral Valve Replacement?

Prof. Patrizio LANCELLOTTI, MD, PhD Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, BELGIUM

Mechanism of and Risk Factors for Reoperation After Mitral Valve Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Surgical repair techniques for IMR: future percutaneous options?

ORIGINAL PAPER. The long-term results and changing patterns of biological valves at the mitral position in contemporary practice in Japan

THE FOLDING LEAFLET. Rafael García Fuster. Cardiac Surgery Department University General Hospital of Valencia

Late secondary TR after left sided heart disease correction: is it predictibale and preventable

Reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body during aortic and

Expanding Relevance of Aortic Valve Repair Is Earlier Operation Indicated?

Aortic valve repair: When and how to employ this novel approach?

Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC, FRCS (Glasgow), FACC, FESC President of Saudi Heart Association King Abdulaziz Cardiac Centre Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Surgical Mininvasive Approach for Mitral Repair Prof. Mauro Rinaldi

Management of Difficult Aortic Root, Old and New solutions

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 21: Online April 18, 2014 doi: /atcs.oa Original Article

Is a minimally invasive approach for re-operative aortic valve replacement superior to standard full resternotomy?

Mitral Gradients and Frequency of Recurrence of Mitral Regurgitation After Ring Annuloplasty for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

The correlation between the coaptation height of mitral valve and mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair

Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Open-Heart Surgery in Patients with Mitral Valve Disease: Comparison of Parasternal and Low-Sternal Approach

Minimally invasive valve sparing mitral valve repair the loop technique how we do it

Ischemic Versus Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Does Etiology Affect Survival?

Degenerative mitral valve disease-contemporary surgical approaches and repair techniques

The risk-benefit ratio of mitral valve operation is

Presenter Disclosure. Patrick O. Myers, M.D. No Relationships to Disclose

What is the Role of Surgical Repair in 2012

Haiping Wang 1,2, Xiancheng Liu 2, Xin Wang 2, Zhenqian Lv 2, Xiaojun Liu 2, Ping Xu 1. Introduction

HURDLES FOR STARTING MINISTERNOTOMY AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM IN OUR INSTITUTE

Despite advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology

The operative mortality rate after redo valvular operations

(Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:845 53)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased morbidity

Clinical outcomes of robotic mitral valve repair: a single-center experience in Korea

Basic Principles of Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair Technical Aspects and Results. Manuel Antunes Coimbra-Portugal

Overview of Surgical Approach to Mitral Valve Disease : Why Repair? Steven F. Bolling, MD Cardiac Surgery University of Michigan

Replacement of the mitral valve in the presence of

Standard AVR. Full Sternotomy CPB

Degenerative mitral valve disease is now the most common

Recurrent mitral regurgitation after repair: Should the mitral valve be re-repaired?

Repair or Replacement

Durability and Outcome of Aortic Valve Replacement With Mitral Valve Repair Versus Double Valve Replacement

Mitral valve repair is the gold standard to treat mitral regurgitation.

De Vega Annuloplasty for Functional Tricupsid Regurgitation: Concept of Tricuspid Valve Orifice Index to Optimize Tricuspid Valve Annular Reduction

The Tricuspid Valve: The Not So Forgotten Valve. Manuel J Antunes Cardiothoracic Surgery Coimbra, Portugal

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome the Homburg experience

How has robotic repair changed the landscape of mitral valve surgery?

Experience with 500 Stentless Aortic Valve Replacements

Contemporary outcomes for surgical mitral valve repair: A benchmark for evaluating emerging mitral valve technology

Prognostic Impact of FMR

Mitral Valve Repair Versus Replacement in Simultaneous Mitral and Aortic Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Disease

Clinical material and methods. Copyright by ICR Publishers 2007

The Key Questions in Mitral Valve Interventions. Where Are We in 2018?

Results of Aortic Valve Preservation and Repair

Clinical outcomes of surgery of mitral valve regurgitation and coronary artery bypass grafting

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Saibal Kar, MD, FACC

How to Perform a Valve Sparing Root Replacement Joseph S. Coselli, M.D.

Surgical AVR: Are there any contraindications? Pyowon Park Samsung Medical Center Seoul, Korea

Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: Comparison of long-term survival and complications

I challenging management problems in cardiac surgery. Mitral Valve Repair for Ischemic Mitral Insufficiency

Early and Midterm Outcomes of the VSSR procedure with De Paulis valsalva graft: A Chinese single-center Experience in 38 patients

TSDA ACGME Milestones

Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation: is it gold all that glitters?

Really Less-Invasive Trans-apical Beating Heart Mitral Valve Repair: Which Patients?

MitraClip in the ICCU: Which Patient will Benefit?

Mitral Valve Repair for 52 Patients with Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Midterm Outcomes Using the Physio Ring in Mitral Valve Reconstruction: Experience in 492 Patients

Mitral Valve Repair at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital; A Preliminary Report.

Ischemic Mitral Valve Disease: Repair, Replace or Ignore?

Transcription:

Featured Article Long term outcomes of posterior leaflet folding valvuloplasty for mitral valve regurgitation Igor Gosev 1, Maroun Yammine 1, Marzia Leacche 1, Siobhan McGurk 1, Vladimir Ivkovic 1, Michael N. D Ambra 2, Lawrence H. Cohn 1 1 Division of Cardiac Surgery, 2 Department of Anesthesiology, Preoperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Correspondence to: Lawrence H. Cohn, MD. Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women s Hospital, 75 Frances Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Email: lcohn@partners.org. Background: Posterior mitral valve leaflet prolapse due to degenerative mitral valve disease has been treated with tissue sparing repair techniques since 2002. The simplified foldoplasty technique effectively lowers the height of the redundant posterior leaflet and creates an optimal coaptation line for the anterior leaflet that results in excellent long term durability, freedom from reoperation, and return of functional status. Methods: Patient demographics and in-hospital outcome data were extracted from electronic medical records of 229 patients, aged 60.6±13.7 years who underwent the procedure for mitral valve repair (MVR) involving the posterior leaflet from myxomatous disease between 2002 and 2014. Parametric analyses were performed on outcomes data, while long-term survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: Concomitant coronary bypass surgery was performed on 32/229 (14%) patients, the mean perfusion time was 119±40 min, and the mean cross clamp time was 86±31 min. Post-operative mortality was 2/229 (0.9%), reoperation for bleeding occurred in 4 (1.7%) and postoperative stroke in 4 (1.7%) patients. Long term follow up rate was 100% and the mean study follow-up duration was 6.8±2.3 years. Overall late mortality rate was 24/229 (14.9%), and mitral valve re-intervention was performed on 7 patients (4.3%). NYHA class III/IV and clinically significant MR at follow up were significantly lower compared to preoperative values (both P<0.001). Conclusions: Our results encourage further use of this simple and effective technique in patients with isolated posterior leaflet prolapse. Keywords: Foldoplasty; ECHO; long-term; follow-up; mitral valve repair (MVR) Submitted Oct 01, 2014. Accepted for publication Oct 20, 2014. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.12.07 View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319x.2014.12.07 Introduction Posterior mitral valve leaflet prolapse due to degenerative mitral valve disease is the most common cause of mitral valve regurgitation (1). Over 90% of these patients undergo successful mitral valve repair (MVR) (2). The most common classic repair consists of triangular or quadrangular resection of prolapsed segment with sliding valvuloplasty of remaining posterior leaflet (3,4). Over the years, tissue sparing repair techniques of the posterior leaflet were introduced by Calafiore et al. and Mihaljevic et al. for patients whose anatomy of posterior leaflet prevented optimal result from being achieved with resection techniques (5,6). Popularization of the foldoplasty technique for posterior leaflet prolapse was done by Tabata et al. who simplified the technique and expanded the indications (7). This technique effectively lowers the height of the redundant posterior leaflet and creates an optimal coaptation line for the anterior leaflet. Midterm results of this technique showed excellent durability and freedom from reoperation as well as excellent return of functional status (8). We report mid to long term outcomes, including ECHO follow-up, of this simplified technique for posterior leaflet repair. Technique Patients were positioned and monitoring lines were

Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, Vol 4, No 5 September 2015 429 A Figure 1 Foldoplasty technique with (A) 4-0 sutures to the posterior leaflet and subsequently (B) tied to the mitral annulus. placed in a regular fashion. Procedures were performed through full sternotomy (FS) or minimally invasive lower hemisternotomy (LHS). Aorta was directly cannulated in both approaches while venous cannulation was direct bicaval for FS and percutaneous femoral for minimally invasive approach. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was initiated and myocardial protection was accomplished with intermittent cold blood cardioplegia given down the aortic root. Sondergaard s groove was opened and left atriotomy was performed exposing the mitral valve. The mitral valve was then inspected in detail and the prolapsed area was identified. Depending on the width of the prolapsed area, one to six double-armed 4-0 polypropylene sutures were placed from the leaflet edge to the annulus of the posterior leaflet (Figure 1A). These sutures were subsequently tied at the mitral annulus, thereby folding over the redundant leaflet to reduce the effective height of the leaflet by at least 50% (Figure 1B). We were able to adjust the leaflet height by changing the entry or exit points of the sutures. A flexible annuloplasty ring was subsequently inserted with 2-0 braided polyester mattress sutures in all patients. The size of the ring was based on the surface area of the anterior leaflet. An LV competency test was then done to confirm that the valve had been adequately repaired. Upon the completion of mitral repair, the left atrium was closed with 4-0 prolene suture. The patient s heart was deaired and the patient was weaned from CPB in the standard manner. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) confirmed adequate MVR. Methods With the approval of the Brigham and Women s Hospital Institutional Review Board, we conducted a retrospective review of all patients with myxomatous disease undergoing MVR of the posterior leaflet using the foldoplasty technique B between January 2002 and May 2014. Patients with less than moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) and those who had concomitant valvular resection were excluded; 229 patients met study criteria. Patient demographics and inhospital outcome data were extracted from electronic medical records. Long-term follow-up of the 161 patients previously reported (8) was obtained from routine clinical follow-up and/or from the cardiologist of record. Survival data was obtained by additional query of the Social Security Death Index and from our State Department of Health. Primary outcomes of interest included repair durability, recurrence of clinically significant MR, and survival. See supplementary Video 1 for footage of the procedure. Statistical analysis Binary variables are presented as percent and number (n); long-term follow up was compared to baseline using McNemar s test for repeated measures. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD); follow-up data was compared to baseline using repeated measures t-test. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate long-term outcomes; follow-up time was calculated in months between the date of surgery and the date of the first of (I) follow-up echo showing clinically significant MR (defined as greater than moderate MR); (II) failure of the foldoplasty requiring reoperation; (III) death; (IV) date of last clinical follow-up documented. Study observation ended on July 31, 2014. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and P 0.05 was the criterion for significance. Results Between January 2002 and May 2014, a total of 2,193 patients underwent MVR involving the posterior leaflet for myxomatous disease. Foldoplasty was performed on 229 (10.4%) of these patients, their mean age was 60.6±13.7 years, and 105 (45.9%) were females. Clinical variables are presented in Table 1. Hypercholesterolemia was present in 147 (64.1%) foldoplasty patients, and 100 (43.7%) patients were hypertensive. Other comorbidities included diabetes (9/229; 3.9%), peripheral vascular disease (11/229; 4.8%), and previous cardiac surgery (3/229; 1.3%). Of the total cohort, 51 (22.3%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV. Preoperative echocardiographic readings showed a mean PA pressure of 24±10 mmhg and severe MR in 163 (71.2%) of the patients and moderate to severe

430 Gosev et al. Posterior mitral leaflet foldoplasty Table 1 Clinical variables Variables All Foldoplasty Follow-up cohort (N=229) (n, %) (N=161) (n, %) Preoperative characteristics Age, mean/sd (yrs) 13.7 (60.6) 14.0 (61.0) Females 105 (45.9) 68 (42.2) Diabetes 9 (3.9) 8 (5.0) Preop creatinine, mean/ 0.2 (1.1) 0.2 (1.0) SD Hypercholesterolemia 147 (64.1) 68 (42.2) Hypertension 100 (43.7) 75 (46.6) Peripheral vascular 11 (4.8) 9 (5.6) disease Cerebrovascular accident 1 (0.4) 1 (0.6) Cerebrovascular disease 5 (2.2) 4 (2.5) Previous cardiac surgery 3 (1.3) 3 (1.9) CABG 2 (0.9) 2 (1.2) Valve 1 (0.4) 1 (0.6) NYHA class III/IV 51 (22.3) 39 (24.2) Ejection fraction, 8 [60] 8 [60] mean/sd [%] Mean PA pressure, mean/sd [mmhg] 10 [24] 12 [24] Degree of mitral regurgitation Moderate 34 (14.8) 28 (17.4) Moderate-to-severe 32 (14.0) 15 (9.3) Severe 163 (71.2) 118 (73.3) Operative outcomes Concomitant CABG 32 (14.0) 25 (15.5) Perfusion time, 40 [119] 40 [117] mean/sd [min] Cross-clamp time, 31 [86] 29 [83] mean/sd [min] Postoperative outcomes Operative mortality 2 (0.9) 1 (0.6) Reoperations for bleed 4 (1.7) 4 (2.5) Stroke 4 (1.7) 2 (1.2) Total ICU stay, 25-69 [46] 26-73 [46] IQR/med. [hrs] LOS, IQR/med. (days) 5-7.5 (6.0) 5-8 (6.0) n, number of patients; SD, standard deviation; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft surgery; NYHA, New York Heart Association Classification; PA, pulmonary artery; ICU, intensity care unit; LOS, length of stay; med, median; IQR, interquartile range. Cumulative proportion 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Postoperative year Figure 2 Freedom from reoperation. in the remainder. Concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) was performed on 32 (14%) patients and the mean perfusion time was 119±40 min and the mean cross clamp time was 86±31 min. Post-operative mortality was 2/229 (0.9%), reoperation for bleeding occurred in 4/229 (1.7%) and postoperative stroke in 4/229 (1.7%). Long term follow-up was 100% and the study s mean observation time was 6.8±2.3 years during which overall mortality was 24 (14.9%), and mitral valve reintervention was performed on seven patients (4.3%; Figure 2, Table 2). NYHA class III/IV and clinically significant MR at followup were significantly lower compared to preoperative values (both P<0.001). Discussion MVR and its traditional techniques described by Carpentier (1) more than three decades ago, has become well established therapy for degenerative mitral valve disease with excellent durability (9,10). Multiple studies have demonstrated important benefits of MVR over replacement (11,12). In the centers of excellence, repair rates for the isolated posterior leaflet prolapse are over 95% (2,3,13,14). However the number of MVR procedures and repair rates in smaller centers is not as high. Reasons for this may be due to the complexity of the techniques and irreversibility of the attempted repairs that, in case of suboptimal result, end with mitral valve replacement and decreased long-term survival. Foldoplasty introduced by Calafiore et al., Mihaljevic et al.

Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, Vol 4, No 5 September 2015 431 Table 2 Follow up variables Contents Follow up Follow-up cohort (N=161) Total patient years 1,076 Study observation time, mean/sd (years) 2.3 (6.8) Mortality during study (n, %) 24 (14.9) Redo MVR or MVP (n, %) 7 (4.3) Time to f/u echo, mean/sd (years) 2.7 (4.9) P vs. baseline Ejection fraction, mean/sd (%) 8.0 (58.0) 0.029 MR at follow-up, mean/sd 0.9 (1.9) 0.001 Clinically significant MR (n, %) 12 (7.5) 0.001 NYHA class at follow-up, mean/sd 0.7 (1.6) 0.001 NYHA class III/IV (n, %) 10 (6.3) 0.001 SD, standard deviation; n, number of patients; MVR, mitral valve repair; MVP, mitral valve valvuloplasty; f/u, follow-up; MR, mitral regurgitation; NYHA, New York Heart Association. and Tabata et al., has been part of our toolbox for MVRs since 2002 (5-7). Due to its appealing qualities, namely technical simplicity, broad applicability and reversibility, it has quickly become one of the favored procedures for posterior mitral leaflet prolapse. As described by Cevasco et al. (8) this technique yields excellent perioperative and midterm results with 100% repair rate for isolated posterior leaflet prolapse and only two patients requiring reoperative procedure on mid-term follow up of 3 years. We describe our results and long-term follow-up of 229 patients who underwent mitral valve foldoplasty. Followup in this series was 100% complete and consisted of 1,076 patient/years. In our cohort only 4.3% of the patients required reoperative surgery over a mean period of 6.8 years and 2% had moderate regurgitation on the follow-up echocardiography that was treated conservatively. Gillinov et al. reported the Cleveland Clinic experience of 1,072 patients with 10 years freedom from reoperation of 93% (9). In their conclusion, repair durability was greatest in patients with quadrangular resections and annuloplasty. Braunberger et al., in their paper from 2001, report on 162 patients with non-rheumatic MR with 74% freedom from cardiac events at 20 years (15) while Flameng et al. report 94% freedom from reoperation but only 71% freedom from significant MR at seven years for degenerative mitral valve disease (16). Similar results observed with the foldoplasty, as well as reproducibility and forgiveness due to tissue sparing repairs, encourage further use of this technique in patients with isolated posterior leaflet prolapse. Limitations of this study include its retrospective observational nature and the lack of a control group. Further randomized studies that compare foldoplasty with other types of posterior mitral leaflet repair may be needed to further validate our results for this technique. Acknowledgements None. Footnote Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. References 1. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery--the "French correction". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:323-37. 2. Seeburger J, Borger MA, Doll N, et al. Comparison of outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for posterior, anterior and bileaflet prolapse. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;36:532-8. 3. DiBardino DJ, ElBardissi AW, McClure RS, et al. Four decades of experience with mitral valve repair: analysis of differential indications, technical evolution, and longterm outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:76-83; discussion 83-4. 4. Carpentier A, Relland J, Deloche A, et al. Conservative management of the prolapsed mitral valve. Ann Thorac Surg 1978;26:294-302. 5. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Actis-Dato G, et al. Longitudinal plication of the posterior leaflet in myxomatous disease of the mitral valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1909-10. 6. Mihaljevic T, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW. Folding valvuloplasty without leaflet resection: simplified method for mitral valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:e46-8. 7. Tabata M, Ghanta RK, Shekar PS, et al. Early and midterm outcomes of folding valvuloplasty without leaflet resection for myxomatous mitral valve disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:1388-90.

432 Gosev et al. Posterior mitral leaflet foldoplasty 8. Cevasco M, Myers PO, Elbardissi AW, et al. Foldoplasty: a new and simplified technique for mitral valve repair that produces excellent medium-term outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:1634-7; discussion 1637-8. 9. Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM, Blackstone EH, et al. Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:734-43. 10. Cohn LH, Couper GS, Aranki SF, et al. Long-term results of mitral valve reconstruction for regurgitation of the myxomatous mitral valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:143-50; discussion 150-1. 11. Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, et al. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation 1995;91:1022-8. 12. Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Nowicki ER, et al. Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:885-93, 893.e1-2. 13. David TE, Armstrong S, Sun Z, et al. Late results of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to degenerative disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:7-12; discussion 13-4. 14. Deloche A, Jebara VA, Relland JY, et al. Valve repair with Carpentier techniques. The second decade. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:990-1001; discussion 1001-2. 15. Braunberger E, Deloche A, Berrebi A, et al. Very longterm results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with carpentier's techniques in nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation 2001;104:I8-11. 16. Flameng W, Herijgers P, Bogaerts K. Recurrence of mitral valve regurgitation after mitral valve repair in degenerative valve disease. Circulation 2003;107:1609-13. Cite this article as: Gosev I, Yammine M, Leacche M, McGurk S, Ivkovic V, D Ambra MN, Cohn LH. Long term outcomes of posterior leaflet folding valvuloplasty for mitral valve regurgitation.. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.12.07