Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Similar documents
Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:09-cv RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

Case 2:15-cv SRC-CLW Document 9 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 246

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 2:09-cv DMC-CCC Document 1 Filed 03/20/2009 Page 1 of 95. Of Counsel:

Case 1:19-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED CANNABIS CORPORATION. Plaintiff, PURE HEMP COLLECTIVE INC.

Case 3:15-cv PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 111 PageID: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Judicial conflict between Bristol-Myers Squibb Co V. Merck & Co Inc. Keytruda V. Opdivo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Civil Action No. 8:14-cv-1322 COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv ECF No. 1 filed 10/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 2:12-cv KJM-GGH Document 1 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. (Sacramento Division)

Case 1:15-cv RBJ Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Plaintiff, Comfort Dental Group, Inc. ( Comfort Dental ), by its attorneys, MOYE WHITE LLP, states: INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Attention: Scott D. Tomsky Vice President, US Generics Regulatory Affairs 425 Privet Road Horsham, PA 19044

Case 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 21

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:15-cv ARR-VVP Document 1 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendant. COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 23

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. Case No.: Plaintiffs Tammie Aust, Alison Grennan, Jennifer Schill, and Lang You Mau, by and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INFORMATION. General Allegations. A. Introduction and Background

Case 2:14-cv SDW-SCM Document 28 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 155 PageID: 398 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DEFAMATION

Associates, llc, for its Complaint against the defendants, Gary K. DeJohn, Sr. and DeJohn

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 24

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY NO. COME NOW Plaintiffs by and through their attorneys of record J.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/28/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/28/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:10-cv JF-MJH Document 1 Filed 06/07/2010 Page 1 of 47 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:09-cv WWC -MCC Document 607 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTEN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

It is illegal to serve more than 40 oz of beer, 1 liter of wine or 4 oz distilled spirits at one time to a guest.

perpetuate -- and perhaps even intensify -- that controversy. 1 On July 18th, the Fifth Circuit affirmed FDA s longstanding position that

Case 3:14-cv JM-WVG Document 1 Filed 11/03/14 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AFFILIATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT

Case 2:15-cv RWS Document 6 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 80

Case 1:13-cv RBK-KMW Document 1 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Parent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement

4. Together, defendants CCA and CCC represent the vast majority of chiropractors practicing in Connecticut.

If you sought health insurance coverage or benefits from MAGNETIC STIMULATION ( TMS )

Return Date: February 27, 2002

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

WESTUE RSDDISSTTRRI CTTCAORUKRATN sas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No.: COMPLAINT

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, WASHINGTON STATE CAUSE NO SEA

Case 2:13-cv CMR Document 1 Filed 01/03/13 Page 1 of 42 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

REGULATIONS OF THE PLYMOUTH BOARD OF HEALTH FOR TOBACCO SALES IN CERTAIN PLACES & SALE OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS TO MINORS

Case: 4:18-cv RLW Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/11/18 Page: 1 of 44 PageID #: 1

Case: 5:15-cr DCR-REW Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/01/15 Page: 1 of 15 - Page ID#: 1

CIGARETTE FIRE SAFETY AND FIREFIGHTER PROTECTION ACT Act of Jul. 4, 2008, P.L. 518, No. 42 Cl. 35 AN ACT

PlainSite. Legal Document

These Rules of Membership apply in respect of all Products purchased by a Member from Sigma (and any Program Partner) on or after 1 February 2017.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv AJT-MJH Document 1 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 2:18-cv JTF-dkv Document 1 Filed 09/25/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

2:12-cv VAR-LJM Doc # 1 Filed 08/02/12 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

H 7816 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Case 2:12-cv LRH-GWF Document 1 Filed 08/24/12 Page 1 of 26

Clinical Policy: Tofacitinib (Xeljanz, Xeljanz XR) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.110 Effective Date:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

INGHAM COUNTY. Effective January 1, 2016 as amended November 10, 2015

Raritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 6/20/17

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 4 Filed 03/07/17 Page 1 of 25 PageID# 299

CSA Briefing Note Regarding Joint Application against the University and Re-Commencing Collection of CFS/CFS-O Fees

The proposed rule is significant, and the requirements and exceptions are complex. Key provisions of the proposal are described below.

Case 1:16-cv SEH Document 1 Filed 03/22/16 Page 1 of 12

Re: Bayer s false and deceptive marketing for its Men s Multis for prevention of cancer

4:18-cv AMQ Date Filed 07/17/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 12/12/2008 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

ANDA Arthur P. Bedrosian, President Armenpharm, Ltd. 49 South Ridge Road P.O. Box D1400 Pomona, NY December 3, 2015

Tamsulosin Hydrochloride 0.4 mg Capsule

ORDINANCE NO

Case 1:12-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 09/11/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION

ORDINANCE NO

GENERAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS

Transcription:

Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PFIZER INC., PF PRISM C.V., and C.P. PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL C.V. v. Plaintiffs, SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED and SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendants. C.A. No. COMPLAINT Pfizer Inc., PF PRISM C.V., and C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V. (collectively Plaintiffs or Pfizer, for their Complaint against Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. (collectively Sun, allege as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action by Pfizer against Sun for infringement of United States Patent No. 6,965,027 (the 027 patent. 2. This action arises out of Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited s filing of ANDA No. 209790 seeking approval by the FDA to sell generic copies of Xeljanz XR (11 mg tofacitinib extended release prior to the expiration of the 027 patent. THE PARTIES 3. Plaintiff Pfizer Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and having a place of business at 235 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017.

Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 2 4. Plaintiff PF PRISM C.V. is a limited partnership (commanditaire vennootschap organized under the laws of the Netherlands, having its registered seat in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and registered at the Trade Register held by the Chamber of Commerce in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, under number 51840456. Pfizer Inc. is the ultimate parent company of PF PRISM C.V. 5. Plaintiff C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V. is a limited partnership (commanditaire vennootschap organized under the laws of the Netherlands, having a place of business at 235 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017. Pfizer Inc. is the ultimate parent company of C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V. 6. On information and belief, defendant Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited is a company organized and existing under the laws of India, having its principal place of business at CTS No. 201 B/1, Western Express Highway, Goregaon (E, Mumbai, India 400063. 7. On information and belief, defendant Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. is a company organized and existing under the laws of Michigan, having its principal place of business at 1 Commerce Drive, Cranbury, New Jersey 08512. On information and belief, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited. On information and belief, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. is the U.S. agent for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 8. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35, United States Code. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338(a, 2201, and 2202. 9. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b. 2

Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 3 10. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Sun. 11. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Sun by virtue of the fact that, inter alia, it has committed a tortious act of patent infringement that has led and/or will lead to foreseeable harm and injury to Plaintiffs, including in Delaware. In particular, this suit arises out of Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited s filing of ANDA No. 209790 seeking FDA approval to sell 11 mg tofacitinib extended release tablets ( Sun Generic XR Tablets prior to the expiration of the 027 patent, throughout the United States, including in Delaware. 12. On information and belief, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. are agents of each other and/or work in concert with each other on the development, obtaining of regulatory approval, marketing, sale, and/or distribution of generic drugs, including Sun Generic XR Tablets, throughout the United States, including in or into Delaware. On information and belief, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, directly or through its subsidiary Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., manufactures, markets, imports, and sells generic drugs for distribution in Delaware and throughout the United States. 13. On information and belief, if ANDA No. 209790 is approved, Sun Generic XR Tablets will, among other things, be marketed and distributed by Sun in Delaware, prescribed by physicians practicing in Delaware, dispensed by pharmacies located in Delaware, and/or used by patients in Delaware. 14. Sun s infringing activities with respect to its filing of ANDA No. 209790 and its intent to commercialize and sell Sun Generic XR Tablets has led and/or will lead to foreseeable harm and injury to Plaintiffs, including Pfizer Inc., which is incorporated in Delaware. 15. On information and belief, Sun maintains substantial, systematic and continuous contacts throughout the United States, including in Delaware. Sun s website states that [i]n the 3

Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 4 US market, which contributes a significant share of our revenues, we are the leader in the generic dermatology segment. We have strong capabilities in developing generic and complex products with a robust pipeline of 149 ANDAs, including high value First-to-File (FTF opportunities. (http://www.sunpharma.com/business-development (last accessed Feb. 10, 2017. Upon information and belief, Sun has distribution and customer service teams at multiple locations across the United States. 16. On information and belief, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. was previously registered to conduct business in Delaware (File No. 5615437 and had the following registered agent in Delaware: The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 17. On information and belief, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. holds Delaware distributor/manufacturer CSR license nos. DM-0010549 and DM-0010171. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. holds Delaware pharmacy - wholesale license nos. A4-0002148 and A4-0002107. 18. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. have previously availed themselves of this Court by consenting to this Court s jurisdiction and asserting counterclaims in other civil actions initiated in this jurisdiction. See, e.g., Galderma Labs., L.P. et al. v. Sun Pharm. Indus. Ltd. et al., No. 1:16-cv-01003-LPS (D. Del. (D.I. 11 (Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. submitted counterclaims and did not contest personal jurisdiction; Pfizer Inc. et al. v. Sun Pharma Global Inc. et al., No. 1:09-cv-00313-GMS (D. Del. (D.I. 13 (same. 19. In the alternative, this Court has jurisdiction over Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k(2. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited has contacts with the United States by, inter alia, having filed its ANDA with the FDA. 4

Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 5 BACKGROUND Xeljanz XR 20. Tofacitinib citrate is an inhibitor of Janus kinases ( JAKs and is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate. 21. The active ingredient in Xeljanz XR is tofacitinib citrate. Xeljanz XR contains tofacitinib citrate in an amount equivalent to 11 mg of tofacitinib base in an extended release tablet formulated for once-daily administration. 22. The FDA-approved Prescribing Information for Xeljanz XR states that tofacitinib citrate has the following chemical name: (3R,4R-4-methyl-3-(methyl-7H-pyrrolo [2,3-d] pyrimidin-4-ylamino-ß-oxo-1-piperidinepropanenitrile, 2-hydroxy-1,2,3- propanetricarboxylate (1:1. Orange Book Listing for Xeljanz XR 23. Pfizer Inc. holds approved NDA No. 208246 for EQ 11 mg base tofacitinib citrate extended release tablets, which Pfizer sells under the registered name Xeljanz XR. 24. Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 355(b(1 and the regulations the FDA has promulgated pursuant thereto, the 027 patent is listed in the FDA publication titled Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the Orange Book for the Xeljanz XR NDA. 25. The Orange Book lists the expiration date for the 027 patent as March 25, 2023. 26. The Orange Book also lists five additional patents for Xeljanz XR that are not at issue: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,956,041 (expiring December 8, 2020; 7,091,208 (expiring December 8, 2020; 7,265,221 (expiring December 8, 2020; 7,301,023 (expiring May 23, 2022; RE41,783 (expiring December 8, 2020. On December 14, 2016, the United States Patent and Trademark 5

Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 6 Office ( USPTO issued a Notice of Final Determination extending the expiration date of the RE 783 patent to December 8, 2025. 27. On November 15, 2005, the USPTO issued the 027 patent, titled Crystalline 3- {4-methyl-3-[methyl-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl-amino]-piperidin-1-yl}-3-oxopropionitrile citrate. The 027 patent is duly and legally assigned to Pfizer Inc. A copy of the 027 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 28. C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V. is the exclusive licensee of the 027 patent. SUN S ANDA 29. By letter dated January 5, 2017 (the Sun XR Notice Letter and received by Pfizer on January 6, 2017, Sun notified Pfizer that it had filed ANDA No. 209790 with the FDA, seeking approval under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ( FDCA to market and sell Sun Generic XR Tablets generic copies of Xeljanz XR (tofacitinib citrate EQ 11 mg base extended release tablets prior to the expiration of the 027 patent. 30. The Sun Notice Letter asserts that ANDA No. 209790 contains a Paragraph IV certification under 21 U.S.C. 355(j(1 and (2(a and that the 027 patent is invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by by Sun Generic XR Tablets. 31. The Sun Notice Letter indicates that the Sun Generic XR Tablets will contain tofacitinib citrate as the active ingredient. 32. On information and belief Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited holds DMF No. 30617 for tofacitinib citrate. 33. The Sun Notice Letter states that ANDA No. 209790 requests approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use or sale of Sun Generic XR Tablets prior to the expiration of the 027 patent. 6

Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 7 34. Attached to the Sun Notice Letter was Sun s Detailed Statement ( Sun s Detailed Statement purportedly asserting the factual and legal bases why, in Sun s opinion and to the best of Sun s knowledge, the 027 patent claims are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the manufacture, use, offer for sale, and/or sale of Sun Generic XR Tablets. 35. Sun s Detailed Statement alleges that all claims of the 027 patent are invalid. Sun s Detailed Statement does not contain a noninfringement argument with respect to claims 1 and 6 the 027 patent, other than that all the claims are invalid. 36. Upon information and belief, upon approval of ANDA No. 209790, Sun will distribute Sun Generic XR Tablets in the United States. COUNT I (Infringement of the 027 Patent by Sun Generic XR Tablets 37. The allegations of paragraphs 1-36 above are repeated and re-alleged as if set forth fully herein. 38. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(e(2(A, Sun s filing of ANDA No. 209790 seeking approval to market Sun Generic XR Tablets is an act of infringement of one or more claims of the 027 patent entitling Pfizer to the relief provided by 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4, including, inter alia, an order of this Court that the effective date of approval for ANDA No. 209790 be a date which is not earlier than the expiration date of the 027 patent. the FDA. 39. Sun had knowledge of the 027 patent when it submitted ANDA No. 209790 to 40. On information and belief, Sun intends to engage in the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or importation of Sun Generic XR Tablets and will thereby infringe at least claim 1 of the 027 patent. 7

Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 8 41. The foregoing actions by Sun constitute and/or would constitute infringement of at least claim 1 of the 027 patent. 42. Pfizer will be substantially and irreparably harmed if Sun is not enjoined from infringing the 027 patent. Pfizer has no adequate remedy at law. COUNT II (Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. Inducing of Infringement by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited 43. The allegations of paragraphs 1-42 above are repeated and re-alleged as if set forth fully herein. 44. On information and belief, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. actively and knowingly caused to be submitted, assisted with, participated in, contributed to, and/or directed the submission by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited of ANDA No. 209790 to the FDA, knowing of the 027 patent. 45. The filing of ANDA No. 209790 by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited constituted direct infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271(e. Under 35 U.S.C. 271(b and 271(e(2(A, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. induced the infringement of the 027 patent by actively and knowingly causing to be submitted, and/or assisting with, participating in, contributing to, and/or directing the submission of ANDA No. 209790 to the FDA knowing that the submission of ANDA No. 209790 would constitute direct infringement of the 027 patent. 8

Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 9 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Pfizer requests the following relief: A. A judgment that Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited s submission of ANDA No. 209790 was an act of infringement and that Sun s making, using, offering to sell, selling or importing Sun Generic XR Tablets prior to the expiration of the 027 patent will infringe the 027 patent; B. A judgment that defendant Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. s knowing and purposeful activities causing to be submitted, and/or assisting with, participating in, contributing to, and/or directing the filing of ANDA No. 209790, knowing that its submission would constitute direct infringement, induced infringement of the 027 patent; C. A judgment that the effective date of any FDA approval for Sun to make, use offer for sale, sell, market, distribute, or import the Sun Generic XR Tablets be no earlier than the dates on which the 027 patent expires, or any later expiration of exclusivity to which Pfizer is or becomes entitled; D. A permanent injunction enjoining Sun, its officers, agents, servants, and employees, and those persons in active concert or participation with any of them, from making using, selling, offering for sale, marketing, distributing, or importing Sun Generic XR Tablets, and from inducing or contributing to any of the foregoing, prior to the expiration of the 027 patent, or any later expiration of exclusivity to which Pfizer is or becomes entitled; E. A judgment that this case is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. 285, entitling Pfizer to an award of its reasonable attorneys fees for bringing and prosecuting this action; 9

Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 10 F. An award of Pfizer s costs and expenses in this action; and G. Such further and additional relief as this Court deems just and proper. MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP OF COUNSEL: Aaron Stiefel Daniel P. DiNapoli Philip Smithback ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP 250 West 55 th Street New York, NY 10019-9710 (212 836-8000 Soumitra Deka ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 (415 471-3100 /s/ Maryellen Noreika Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014 Maryellen Noreika (#3208 1201 North Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302 658-9200 jblumenfeld@mnat.com mnoreika@mnat.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs February 14, 2017 10