Greater Baltimore Medical Center Sandra & Malcolm Berman Cancer Institute

Similar documents
GREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER SANDRA & MALCOLM BERMAN CANCER INSTITUTE

Community Comprehensive Cancer Program at Swedish Covenant Hospital 2009 Annual Report reflecting 2008 statistical data

2011 to 2015 New Cancer Incidence Truman Medical Center - Hospital Hill

Truman Medical Center-Hospital Hill Cancer Registry 2014 Statistical Summary Incidence

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

Evolution of CoC within ACoS. American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Current Activities and Future Initiatives November 5,2005

Annual Report. Cape Cod Hospital and Falmouth Hospital Regional Cancer Network Expert physicians. Quality hospitals. Superior care.

Cancer in Estonia 2014

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

LANDMARK MEDICAL CENTER CANCER PROGRAM YEAR IN REVIEW 2013

2015 Patient Outcomes Report

ANNUAL CANCER REGISTRY REPORT-2005

Message from the President & CEO John Solheim, FACHE

CANCER FACTS & FIGURES For African Americans

2015 Cancer Program Annual Report. Based on 2015 Cancer Program Activities and 2014 Cancer Registry Data

Collection of Recorded Radiotherapy Seminars

Oncology 101. Cancer Basics

Radiation Oncology Study Guide

2017 CANCER REPORT. with data from 2016

Estimated Minnesota Cancer Prevalence, January 1, MCSS Epidemiology Report 04:2. April 2004

2016 CANCER PROGRAM REPORT. Bay Medical Sacred Heart Health System 615 North Bonita Avenue Panama City, FL

COMMUNITY CANCER PROGRAM ACCREDITATION WITH COMMENDATION BY THE COMMISION ON CANCER

2016 Oncology Institute Annual Report

2016 Cancer Registry Annual Report

Clinical indications for positron emission tomography

Burden of Cancer in California

Cancer in New Mexico 2017

CANCER PROGRAM Annual Report. Cancer Registry Database 2008 CANCER CASES AND BREAST CANCER SITE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS

Cancer in New Mexico 2014

Common Questions about Cancer

Financial Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Review and Impact of the NCDB PUF. Moderator: Sandra Wong, MD, MS, FACS, FASCO

John R. Marsh Cancer Center

Cancer Institute. cancer institute Program overview Report 2013

*

AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE ON CANCER AJCC CANCER STAGING

American Cancer Society Estimated Cancer Deaths by Sex and Age (years), 2013

Radiation Oncology MOC Study Guide

DATA REQUEST RESPONSE- XRT AND BRACHYTHERAPY

Cancer Program Report 2014

THE BURDEN OF CANCER IN NEBRASKA: RECENT INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY DATA

Overview of 2010 Hong Kong Cancer Statistics

Epidemiology in Texas 2006 Annual Report. Cancer

Cancer prevalence. Chapter 7

Overview of Hong Kong Cancer Statistics of 2015

The New CP 3 R Application And Revisions To Standard 4.6 Integration Of The NCDB With The Accreditation Process

SMOKING AND CANCER RISK

performed to help sway the clinician in what the appropriate diagnosis is, which can substantially alter the treatment of management.

Cancer in Ontario. 1 in 2. Ontarians will develop cancer in their lifetime. 1 in 4. Ontarians will die from cancer

INTRODUCTION TO CANCER STAGING

Cancer A Superficial Introduction

2009 Cancer Program Annual Report

Cancer in Northeastern Pennsylvania: Incidence and Mortality of Common Cancers

Cancer in Northeastern Pennsylvania: Incidence and Mortality of Common Cancers

CERVIX MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS

National Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2014

A Time- and Resource-Efficient Method for Annually Auditing All Reporting Hospitals in Your State: the Inpatient & Outpatient Hospital Discharge Files

Overview of 2013 Hong Kong Cancer Statistics

!"#$ Oncology Outcomes Report

HUNT CANCER INSTITUTE CANCER SERVICES REPORT 2014

Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital Cancer Program Annual Report (2005 statistical review of LCRH Cancer Registry Database)

Cancer survival in Shanghai, China,

Cancer in Northeastern Pennsylvania: Incidence and Mortality of Common Cancers

Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital

CANCER ANNUAL REPORT Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Network at Froedtert Health St. Joseph s Hospital s Kraemer Cancer Center

2009 Annual Report Alvin & Lois Lapidus Cancer Institute LifeBridge Health

SMOKING AND CANCER RISK

ACR TXIT TM EXAM OUTLINE

Cancer in Rural Illinois, Incidence, Mortality, Staging, and Access to Care. April 2014

Cancer Treatment Centers of America ATLANTA CANCER REGISTRY. Annual Report

REPORT American College of Surgeons Approved Program

Construction of a North American Cancer Survival Index to Measure Progress of Cancer Control Efforts

CANCER REPORTING IN CALIFORNIA: ABSTRACTING AND CODING PROCEDURES California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume I

Overview of Gynecologic Cancers in New Jersey

Chapter 3. Neoplasms. Copyright 2015 Cengage Learning.

Oncology Clinical Program Update. William Sause Medical Director Oncology Clinical Program

2012 Cancer Report 2011 Registry Data

Cancer survival in Busan, Republic of Korea,

Cancer survival in Seoul, Republic of Korea,

DEPARTMENT OF ONCOLOGY ELECTIVE

PROMEDICA MONROE REGIONAL HOSPITAL Annual Report

Florida Cancer Data System STAT File Documentation Version 2019

NAACR Treatment Webinar Quiz 1

Cancer survival in Hong Kong SAR, China,

Key Words. Cancer statistics Incidence Lifetime risk Multiple primaries Survival SEER

What is the Impact of Cancer on African Americans in Indiana? Average number of cases per year. Rate per 100,000. Rate per 100,000 people*

A B ING TON HO SPITAL J E F F E R SO N H E ALTH 2018 ANNUAL REPORT CANCER

2016 Public Outcomes Report

Physician On-line Staging Application. Darlene Dale Head, PMH Cancer Registry

Dr. Tareq Salah Ahmed,MD,ESMO. Lecturer of clinical oncology, Assiut faculty of medicine ESMO accreditation certificate

5/8/2014. AJCC Stage Introduction and General Rules. Acknowledgements* Introduction. Melissa Pearson, CTR North Carolina Central Cancer Registry

CODING STAGE: TNM AND OTHER STAGING SYSTEMS. Liesbet Van Eycken Otto Visser

Presented By Shirley Jordan Seay PhD, RN, CTR

OSCaR UPDATE. Manager s Update Donald Shipley, MS. Oregon State Cancer Registry

Cancer of the Head and Neck and. HPV Infection. Andrew Urquhart MD, FACS Dept. Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery Marshfield Clinic

Reporting of Cancer Stage Information by Acute Care Hospitals in Ontario

Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA) Fact Sheet on the Top Ten Cancers per Population Group

Cancer in Ireland : Annual Report of the National Cancer Registry

Head and Neck Cancer in FA: Risks, Prevention, Screening, & Treatment Options David I. Kutler, M.D., F.A.C.S.

Neoplasia part I. Dr. Mohsen Dashti. Clinical Medicine & Pathology nd Lecture

Transcription:

2008 ANNUAL REPORT Greater Baltimore Medical Center Sandra & Malcolm Berman Cancer Institute Cancer Registry Report The Cancer Data Management System/ Cancer Registry collects data on all types of cancer diagnosed or treated in an institution and is one of the four major components of an approved cancer program. From the reference or starting date of January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2007, GBMC s Cancer Registry has abstracted into its database the demographic, diagnostic, staging, treatment and follow-up information on 34,584 cancer cases. To ensure accurate survival statistics, the Registry is required to follow these patients annually. GBMC s follow-up rate is 97 percent. All data are reported quarterly to the Maryland Cancer Registry (MCR), which is part of the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and annually to the National Cancer Database (NCDB), the data management system for hospitals and programs approved by the Commission on Cancer. Co-sponsored by the American Cancer Society and the American College of Surgeons, the NCDB uses submitted data for comparative studies that evaluate oncology care and provides a Benchmark Summary of Cancer Care and Survival in the United States. The Cancer Committee at the Greater Baltimore Medical Center authorized our facility s 2006 data submission to the NCDB, which included site and stage data, to be posted to the American Cancer Society (ACS) web site (www.cancer.org). This Facility Information Profile System (FIPS) allows patients to view the types of cancers diagnosed and treated at a particular facility and can help patients make more educated decisions about their cancer care. The MCR uses data to evaluate incidence rates for the entire state, and compares data by region and county; they also participate in national studies. In addition to required reporting, the Cancer Registry at GBMC provides data for physician studies and educational conferences. The Maryland Cancer Registry, the National Cancer Database and the Greater Baltimore Medical Center and its Sandra & Malcolm Berman Cancer Institute support websites. One part-time and three full-time Certified Tumor Registrars and a part-time follow-up clerk staff the Cancer Registry at GBMC. For additional information, call 443-849-8063. Analysis The Cancer Registry accessioned 2,018 cases during calendar year 2007. Of these, 1,918 were analytic cases those patients who were initially diagnosed at GBMC and/or received all or part of their first course of treatment at GBMC. The 100 non-analytic cases were initially diagnosed and treated at other facilities before referral to GBMC for additional treatment for recurrent disease or were initially diagnosed or treated at GBMC prior to January 1,1990. Many of these nonanalytic patients chose to be treated in one of the many clinical trials available at GBMC. 18 ~ GREATER ONCOLOGY TODAY ~ Winter 2009

In addition, the Cancer Registry reported 12 patients with benign brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors to the MCR. Beginning in January 2004, all hospital registries in the United States were required to collect data on both malignant and non-malignant CNS tumors and follow these patients for their lifetime. These patients are part of the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS). In 2007, the average age at diagnosis for males at GBMC was 64.9 years; for females, it was 60.5 years. The racial distribution of cases includes 83.9% Caucasian, 14.8% African-American, 1% Asian and 0.3% other. While 52.5% of patients diagnosed or treated at GBMC live in Baltimore County and 18.7% live in Baltimore City, patients come from 18 other Maryland counties, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and other states for treatment. Site Distribution Breast cancer continues to be the most frequently diagnosed and/or treated cancer at GBMC, with 527 analytic cases. The second most common cancer at GBMC is prostate with 221 analytics, followed by lung (160 analytics), colon/rectum (153 analytics) and thyroid (79 analytics). (Tables 1 and 2) The American Cancer Society s Surveillance Research estimated that 26,390 new cancer cases would be diagnosed in Maryland in 2007. That same year, GBMC diagnosed and/or treated an increased number of cancers of the prostate (221 compared to 205 in 2006) and esophagus (12 compared to 9 in 2006). In addition, the total number of head and neck cancers seen at GBMC increased from 183 in 2006 to 203 in 2007. Gynecological cancers increased from 194 to 246. The number of lymphomas diagnosed and/or treated at GBMC increased from 66 to 78. s Table 1 n GBMC Site Distribution n All Cases 2007 Total Non- Primary Site Cases Analytic Analytic Male Female GENITOURINARY 338 317 21 299 39 Prostate 232 221 11 232 0 Renal 44 42 2 24 20 Bladder 50 43 7 31 19 Other GU 12 11 1 12 0 BREAST 545 527 18 6 539 GASTROINTESTINAL 265 253 12 118 147 Esophagus 13 12 1 11 2 Stomach 20 19 1 10 10 Colon/Rectum 159 153 6 66 93 Anal 20 19 1 8 12 Pancreas 27 24 3 11 16 Other GI 26 26 0 12 14 GYNECOLOGIC 258 246 12 0 258 Cervix Uteri 92 90 2 0 92 Corpus Uteri 84 80 4 0 84 Ovary 44 42 2 0 44 Other Gyn 38 34 4 0 38 HEAD AND NECK 213 203 10 103 110 Oral Cavity 35 32 3 16 19 Pharynx 38 38 0 26 12 Salivary Gland 13 13 0 6 7 Larynx 34 31 3 24 10 Thyroid 83 79 4 24 59 Other Head & Neck 10 10 0 7 3 LUNG 164 160 4 88 76 LYMPH NODES 59 53 6 28 31 BONE MARROW 49 43 6 23 26 SKIN* 64 56 8 32 32 SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA 5 5 0 3 2 CNS 14 13 1 10 4 OTHER 16 15 1 9 7 UNKNOWN PRIMARY 28 27 1 14 14 ALL SITES TOTAL 2,018 1,918 100 733 1,285 *Skin Excludes basal/squamous skin cancers Database GREATER ONCOLOGY TODAY ~ Winter 2009 ~ 19

Table 2 n GBMC Site Distribution by Sex 2007 Based on 1.918 Analytic Cases Males 693 (36%) Melanoma 16 (2.3) Oral 37 (5.3) Lung 83 (12.0) Pancreas 8 (1.2) Stomach 7 (1.0) Colon/Rectum 61 (8.8) Urinary 51 (7.4) Prostate 221 (31.9) Leukemia & Lymphoma 46 (6.6) All Other 163 (23.5) Females 1,225 (64%) Melanoma 22 (1.8) Oral 25 (2.0) Breast 522 (42.6) Lung 72 (5.9) Pancreas 15 (1.2) Colon/Rectum 89 (7.3) Ovary 40 (3.3) Uterus 153 (12.5) Urinary 34 (2.8) Leukemia & Lymphoma 50 (4.1) All Other 203 (16.6) *Key ###### Number of Cases (##.#% of Column Total) 1997, Onco, Inc. Numbers based on ACS All Sites distribution Table 3 n AJCC at Diagnosis 2007 Based on 1,918 Analytic Cases 35.0% 3 25.0% 2 26.1% 23.5% Staging To help the physician evaluate the patient s disease at diagnosis, estimate prognosis, guide treatment, evaluate therapy and access the results of early cancer detection, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) has established a TNM Staging Classification based on the premise that cancers of similar sites and histologies share similar patterns of growth and extension. In the TNM staging system, T relates to extent of the primary tumor, N relates to lymph node involvement and M indicates the presence of distant metastases. The combination of the TNM provides a stage group classification of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or unstageable. Cancers may be unstageable because no AJCC staging classification exists for the site. For example, leukemias, unknown primaries and primary brain tumors cannot be staged using the AJCC criteria. Also, patients may be unstageable because they choose to forego treatment or further testing needed to determine the appropriate stage. At diagnosis, 11.5% of GBMC's 1,918 analytic cases were 0 (in situ), the earliest stage tumors. In general, the survival rates for in-situ cancers are higher than for those of invasive cancers. Of the invasive cancers, 26.1% were 1; 23.5% were 2; 14% were 3; 11.1% were 4; and 13.8% had no AJCC stage for the site or were unstageable. (Table 3) n August 4, 2008 15.0% 1 11.5% 14.0% 11.1% 13.8% 5.0% 0 1 2 3 4 1,918 analytic cases Unstageable 20 ~ GREATER ONCOLOGY TODAY ~ Winter 2009

Focus: Carcinoma of the Tonsil By, Eva Zinreich, MD In 2007, head and neck cancer was the fifth most common cancer with incidence of 780,000 new cases a year worldwide and an estimated 45,000 new cases in the United States. The incidence rate is more then twice as high in men as in women. Using Cancer Registry data for GBMC, we evaluated patients with advanced stage cancer of the tonsil for the period 1996-2002 and compared the results with the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). The majority of our patients were III and IV (53 patients). Twelve patients were I and II. The incidence ratio of men/ women was 50/16 (75.8 percent / 24.2 percent) and corresponds to the national numbers. (Table 1) Compared to current cases (15 patients in 2007), the age distribution has changed slightly since the studied period (1996-2002) with a shift to younger age in 2007. (Table 2) The five-year survival of patients treated at GBMC during 1996-2002 compares favorably with the National Cancer Data Base. (Table 3) The five-year survival for III was 85.7 percent versus 63.4 percent and for IV patients it was 62.2 percent versus 51.7 percent (GBMC / NCDB). (Figure 1) The treatment for tonsil cancer in this study period was surgery for early stage cancer. For advanced stage, surgery was followed by post-operative radiation therapy with very few patients receiving post-operative chemotherapy. (Tables 3a, 3b) Since 2000, the treatment of tonsil cancer has changed. For patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer that includes the base of tongue and the tonsillar fossa, treatment involves organ preservation using radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Surgery is then applicable for residual disease. At GBMC, for advanced nodal involvement (N2-3 patients), we use hyper-fractionated radiation therapy and chemotherapy, followed by neck dissection. Our results with a median follow-up of 27 months showed a survival rate of 83 percent, and the disease-free survival was 78 percent. We found at surgery that 20 percent of our patients still harbor microscopic disease in the neck nodes, thus the need for neck dissection. To facilitate this multi-modal treatment, we have instituted a multidisciplinary approach. A dedicated head and neck group is in place and includes: head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, speech pathologists, social workers, dieticians, nurses and a specialized orthodontist. All members have a major impact in the therapeutic decision-making, keeping in mind that prolonging longevity, maintaining quality of life with least side effects and preventing complications are the objectives. Multi-modal treatment in advanced head and neck cancer emerged as the standard of care for these patients. The newest technology affords improved local control and reduces the side effects and complications. Newer radiation techniques such as IMRT reduced the occurrence of local toxicities such as xerostomia, and therefore improved the quality of life in our patients. Our intention is to help develop and rapidly adopt treatment advances to provide the highest quality of care and best quality of life for our referred patient population. While alcohol and tobacco abuse are known risk factors, the presence of the HPV virus in pre-treatment biopsies may also be a factor that may influence the chosen type of treatment and expected response. The aim is to be able to predict tumor behavior and the potential for metastasis. Understanding these issues will shape the appropriate selection of optimal therapy. n GREATER ONCOLOGY TODAY ~ Winter 2009 ~ 21

Table 1 n Tonsillar Cancer n Comparison of AJCC Staging 100% 90% GBMC (2007) N = 15 GBMC (1996-2002) N = 66 80% 70% 68.2% 60% 50% 46.7% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 33.3% 12.1% 13.3% 12.1% 6.1% 6.7% 1.5% 0 1 2 3 4 Unknown Table 2 n Tonsillar Cancer n Age at Diagnosis 35.0% 33.3% 3 25.0% GBMC (2007) N = 15 GBMC (1996-2002) N = 66 25.8% 28.8% 26.7% 2 15.0% 2 16.7% 15.2% 13.3% 1 5.0% 6.7% 7.6% 3.0% 1.5% 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 22 ~ GREATER ONCOLOGY TODAY ~ Winter 2009

Table 3a n Treatment Combinations n Tonsillar Cancer at GBMC n 1 Surgery alone Radiation only 12.5% Chemo only 87.5% Surgery/Rad Surgery/Chemo Radiation/Chemo Surg/Rad/Chemo Other comb GBMC (1996-2002) N = 8 GBMC (2007) N = 0 No tx 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Table 3b n Treatment Combinations n Tonsillar Cancer at GBMC n 4 Surgery alone Radiation only Chemo only 2.2% 2.2% 6.7% GBMC (1996-2002) N=46 GBMC (2007) N=7 Surgery/Rad Surgery/Chemo 2.2% 66.7% Radiation/Chemo 11.1% 71.4% Surg/Rad/Chemo 4.4% 28.6% Other comb No tx 4.4% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 GBMC 2 GBMC 3 GBMC 4 GBMC 1 NCDB 2 NCDB 3 NCDB 4 NCDB 5 Year Observed Survival Rate GBMC (1996-2002) NCDB (1998-2000) 1 N = 8 38% N = 445 65.8% 2 N = 4 75% N = 893 67.9% 3 N = 8 85.7% N = 1793 63.4% 4 N = 45 62.2% N = 4539 51.7% Figure 1 n Five-Year Survival n Tonsillar Cancer at GBMC 1996-2002 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Data from the NCDB/Commission on Cancer 2008 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Years of Survival GREATER ONCOLOGY TODAY ~ Winter 2009 ~ 23