DISCLOSURE SLIDE. ARGOS: research funding, scientific advisory board

Similar documents
Optimized administration sequence and timing of active dendritic cell immunotherapy with a PD1 checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) resulted in strong synergy

Immunotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma. James Larkin

ASSESSING LONG-TERM BENEFITS OF IMMUNOTHERAPY BASED ON EARLY TUMOR ASSESSMENT DATA

Negative Trials in RCC: Where Did We Go Wrong? Can We Do Better?

Sergio Bracarda MD. Head, Medical Oncology Department of Oncology AUSL-8 Istituto Toscano Tumori (ITT) San Donato Hospital Arezzo, Italy

Immunotherapy versus targeted treatments in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The return game?

CONSIDERATIONS IN DEVELOPMENT OF PEMBROLIZUMAB IN MSI-H CANCERS

Immunotherapy for Melanoma. Michael Postow, MD Melanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Fifteenth International Kidney Cancer Symposium November 4-5, 2016 Marriott Miami Biscayne Bay, Miami, Florida, USA

UPDATE FROM ASCO GU FEBRUARY 2018, SAN FRANCISCO, USA. Prof. David Pfister University Hospital of Cologne Germany RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

2 nd line Therapy and Beyond NSCLC. Alan Sandler, M.D. Oregon Health & Science University

Media Release. Basel, 6 th February 2018

WHY LOOK FOR ADDITIONAL DATA TO ENRICH THE KAPLAN-MEIER CURVES? Immuno-oncology, only an example

MOLOGEN AG. Pioneering Immune Therapy. Annual Results Analysts Call March 25, 2014

AACR 2018 Investor Meeting

Developing Novel Immunotherapeutic Cancer Treatments for Clinical Use

Characterization of Patients with Poor-

Timing of targeted therapy in patients with low volume mrcc. Eli Rosenbaum Davidoff Cancer Center Beilinson Hospital

III Sessione I risultati clinici

Media Release. Basel, 18 February 2017

Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (arcc ) - Additional Analysis Using RPSFT

Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc): Results of a phase I trial

INMUNOTERAPIA I. Dra. Virginia Calvo

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

Sequencing of therapies in mrcc. Ari Hakimi MD Assistant Professor Urology Service, Department of Surgery MSKCC

Adjusting the Crossover Effect in Overall Survival Analysis Using a Rank Preserving Structural Failure Time Model: The Case of Sunitinib GIST Trial

Renal Cell Carcinoma: Systemic Therapy Progress and Promise

Current experience in immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Edith A. Perez, Ahmad Awada, Joyce O Shaughnessy, Hope Rugo, Chris Twelves, Seock-Ah Im, Carol Zhao, Ute Hoch, Alison L. Hannah, Javier Cortes

Emerging Biomarkers of VEGF and mtor Inhibitors in 2015

Indication for- and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy Kidney- and bladder cancer: Immunotherapy

R&D Conference Call. CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. Department Manager of Oncology Lifecycle Management Dept. Megumi Uzu.

The role of cytoreductive. nephrectomy in elderly patients. with metastatic renal cell. carcinoma in an era of targeted. therapy

Recent Advances in Gastrointestinal Cancers

Developping the next generation of studies in RCC

EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC

A randomized phase 2 trial of CRLX101 in combination with bevacizumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc) vs standard of care

The Really Important Questions Current Immunotherapy Trials are Not Answering

Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is overall survival, measured as the time in weeks from randomization to date of death due to any cause.

Structured Immuno-Oncology Combination Strategies To Maximize Efficacy

TOP-LINE DATA FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE 2 IMPULSE STUDY IN SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER (SCLC): IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC MAINTENANCE TREATMENT WITH LEFITOLIMOD

Lung Cancer Non-small Cell Local, Regional, Small Cell, Other Thoracic Cancers: The Question Isn t Can We, but Should We

Immunotherapy, an exciting era!!

Pioneering vaccines that transform lives.

The High-Dose Aldesleukin (IL-2) Select Trial in Patients with Metastatic RCC

David N. Robinson, MD

Targeted Agents as Maintenance Therapy. Karen Kelly, MD Professor of Medicine UC Davis Cancer Center

NewLink Genetics Corporation

Advances in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Statistical Challenges in Immunotherapy: Non Proportional Hazard Model. BBS / PSI CIT event 15-June-2017, Basel Claude BERGE, Roche

The Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Arvin Yang, MD PhD Oncology Global Clinical Research Bristol-Myers Squibb

Study Design and Analysis in Late-Stage Cancer Immunotherapy Trials

IMpower132: PFS and Safety Results with 1L Atezolizumab + Carboplatin/Cisplatin + Pemetrexed in Stage IV Non-Squamous NSCLC

Targeted Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients

Synopsis (C1034T02) CNTO 95 Module 5.3 Clinical Study Report C1034T02

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Medical treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc) in the elderly ( 65y): Position of a SIOG Taskforce

Is Immune Therapy the Holy Grail in Metastatic Kidney Cancer?

Prostate cancer Management of metastatic castration sensitive cancer

Nivolumab in Patients With DNA Mismatch Repair Deficient/Microsatellite Instability High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Update From CheckMate 142

MOLOGEN AG. Pioneering Immune Therapy. Q1 Results 2014 Conference Call. Dr. Matthias Schroff, CEO

A Phase II Study of Atezolizumab With or Without Bevacizumab vs Sunitinib in Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients

Metastatic NSCLC: Expanding Role of Immunotherapy. Evan W. Alley, MD, PhD Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Presbyterian

Melanoma: Immune checkpoints

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Docetaxel (Taxotere )

Roche presents updated results for investigational cancer immunotherapy atezolizumab in advanced bladder cancer

DYNAMO: A PHASE 2 STUDY OF DUVELISIB IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY INDOLENT NON HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

Choosing Optimal Therapy for Advanced Non-Squamous (NS) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Fifteenth International Kidney Cancer Symposium

1 st Appraisal Committee meeting Background & Clinical Effectiveness Gillian Ells & Malcolm Oswald 24/11/2016

Scientific Perspectives of Olaratumab Beyond the Approval Indication

Have Results of Recent Randomized Trials Changed the Role of mtor Inhibitors?

Bodoky G, Gil-Delgado M, Cascinu S, Lipatov ON, Cunningham D, Van Cutsem E, Muro K, Chandrawansa K, Liepa AM, Carlesi R, Ohtsu A, Wilke H

CLINICAL CHALLENGES IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: THE RIGHT THERAPY FOR THE RIGHT PATIENT

Summary of Phase 3 IMPACT Trial Results Presented at AUA Meeting Webcast Conference Call April 28, Nasdaq: DNDN

in combination with cisplatin as first-line doublet 3 as maintenance agent following non-pemetrexed platinum doublet 4

Oncotype DX testing in node-positive disease

Biomarkers in Imunotherapy: RNA Signatures as predictive biomarker

Debate 1 Are treatments for small cell lung cancer getting better? No:

Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Cancer

Kidney Cancer Session

CheckMate 025, as patients may derive a benefit, based on the opinion of the CGP and the mechanism of action of nivolumab.

MOLOGEN AG. Company Presentation October 2015

Androgen Receptor Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A New Actionable Target?

Immunotherapy for Genitourinary Cancers

ESMO Madrid, Spain Associate Professor Brian Costello Division of Medical Oncology, Genitourinary Tumour Group, Mayo Clinic, USA

Releasing the Brakes on Tumor Immunity: Immune Checkpoint Blockade Strategies

Synopsis. Study Phase and Title: Study Objectives: Overall Study Design

Immunotherapy in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma: Where Do We Stand? Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD St. Luke s Cancer Center Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Maintenance paradigm in non-squamous NSCLC

Immunotherapy for Kidney Cancer: Finally Center-Stage? Nizar M. Tannir, MD, FACP Professor and Deputy Chair GU Medical Oncology

MOLOGEN AG Jefferies 2014 London Healthcare Conference

Evidenze cliniche nel trattamento del RCC

Disclosures. Immunotherapyin Head & NeckCancer. Actual landscape of systemic treatment in HNSCC. Head andneckcanceris an immunogeneic tumor

Squamous Cell Carcinoma Standard and Novel Targets.

Prognostic Factors for mrcc: Relevance in Clinical Practice

Maintenance therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Egbert F. Smit MD PhD Dept Thoracic Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute

TRIALs of CDK4/6 inhibitor in women with hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer

6/7/16. Melanoma. Updates on immune checkpoint therapies. Molecularly targeted therapies. FDA approval for talimogene laherparepvec (T- VEC)

Transcription:

INTERIM ANALYSIS OF THE PHASE 3 ADAPT TRIAL EVALUATING ROCAPULDENCEL-T (AGS-003), AN INDIVIDUALIZED IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEWLY-DIAGNOSED PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA (MRCC) Robert Figlin, MD R Figlin, N Tannir, S Tykodi, D Chen, V Master, B Lane, M DeBendette, W Tian, T Monesmith, S Leland, J Abbey, C Nicolette, and C Wood for the ADAPT study team. esmo.org

DISCLOSURE SLIDE ARGOS: research funding, scientific advisory board 2

Metastatic RCC Represents a Significant Unmet Medical Need Metastatic clear cell RCC (mrcc) is largely incurable and has a poor prognosis Approximately 1/3 of mrcc patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and have the worst prognoses These poor and intermediate risk patients exhibit disease progression within ~5-8 months and survive for ~2 years with a 5 year survival rate of 5-15% when treated with modern targeted therapies 3

Rocapuldencel-T Mechanism Of Action Rocapuldencel-T consists of autologous dendritic cells programmed with amplified RNA from patient s primary tumor Designed to overcome immunosuppression and induce broadly reactive, long-lasting anti-tumor memory T cells Electroporation with autologous total amplified tumor mrna programs DCs with a large number of tumor antigens, including private neoantigens RNA-encoded CD40L protein allows DCs to produce IL-12, necessary to overcome immunosuppression and required for memory T cell differentiation 4

Phase 3 ADAPT Trial Design n = 462 2:1 6 WEEKS Sunitinib Control Arm: Standard Therapy Alone 1 Rocapuldencel-T + Standard Therapy 1 Newly diagnosed renal cell carcinoma (clear cell histology) with metastatic disease Randomized, open label front line study Stratified by Heng risk factors (77% Intermediate Risk and 23% Poor Risk) Dosing: Weeks 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24 and quarterly thereafter Primary endpoint: OS (log rank test) Secondary endpoints: PFS, response rate and disease control rate (RECIST) Exploratory endpoint: Immune responses 107 clinical sites in North America, Europe and Israel (1) Other therapies may be substituted for sunitinib for intolerance or progression 5

ITT Population Characteristics No significant differences in baseline characteristics between the combination arm and the control arm Median follow-up is 20 months (range: 0.4 47.7 months) Median number of doses of rocapuldencel-t is 8 (48 weeks) Generally comparable subsequent and sequential standard-of-care treatments in each arm 6

ITT Population: Baseline Characteristics Baseline characteristics are consistent across both arms Combination Arm Control Arm ITT Population n=307 n=155 Median Age 60.0 yr 61.0 yr Gender, Male 227 73.9% 114 73.5% Race White 288 93.8% 151 97.4% Non-White 19 6.2% 4 2.6% Time from Initial Dx 2.67 mo 2.63 mo Metastatic Disease Yes 305 99.3% 155 100.0% Measurable 273 88.9% 135 87.1% Non-measurable 32 10.4% 20 12.9% No 2 0.7% 0 0% Heng Risk Factors Intermediate Risk 235 76.5% 120 77.4% Poor Risk 72 23.5% 35 22.6% Karnofsky Performance Status 100% 104 33.9% 55 35.5% 90% 120 39.1% 61 39.4% 80% 69 22.5% 32 20.6% 70% 12 3.9% 7 4.5% 60% 1 0.3% 1 0% 7

Patient Disposition at Interim Analysis 1 Total Subjects Randomized n=462 Combination Arm n=307 Control Arm n=155 Combo Subjects Who Died n=149 Control Subjects Who Died n=69 Combo Subjects Alive n=158 Control Subjects Alive n=86 ITT population (all randomized patients) includes 39 patients who never received rocapuldencel-t Successful manufacture for over 96% of patients 67 patients were receiving rocapuldencel-t in the combination arm at time of interim analysis (1) The data cut-off date for the interim analysis was February 3, 2017 8

Primary Endpoint Interim Analysis - Overall Survival Interim Analysis Combination Arm Control Arm ITT Population n=307 n=155 Percentage Censored Subjects 51% 55% Median Overall Survival (months) 1 27.7 32.4 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 23.0, 35.9 22.5, - Hazard Ratio (95% CI) - Unadjusted 1.10, (0.83, 1.46) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Adjusted 2 1.06, (0.79, 1.40) At Interim Analysis: More than half the subjects in both treatment groups were censored for survival Approximately 98% of the censored subjects remained alive at interim analysis (1) Median overall survival estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology (2) Adjusted for randomization stratification factors - number of Heng risk factors and metastatic disease status (measurable vs. non-measurable) 9

Key Secondary Endpoint Interim Analyses Progression Free Survival Combination Arm Control Arm ITT Population n=307 n=155 Median Progression Free Survival (months) 1 6.0 7.8 95% CI 5.8, 6.7 5.9, 9.3 Hazard Ratio 1.15 95% CI 0.92, 1.44 (1) Progression determined by investigator and not by independent radiographic review 10

Key Secondary Endpoint Interim Analyses Objective Response Rate Combination Arm Control Arm ITT Population n=307 n=155 Best Overall Response, n (%) Complete Response (CR) 9 (2.9%) 3 (1.9) Partial Response (PR) 122 (39.7%) 58 (37.4%) Stable Disease (SD) 121 (39.4%) 57 (36.8%) Progressive Disease (PD) 30 (9.8%) 10 (6.5%) Not Evaluable (NE) 25 (8.1%) 27 (17.4%) Objective Response Rate (CR + PR) n (%) (95% Confidence Interval) Disease Control Rate (CR + PR + SD), n (%) (95% Confidence Interval) 131 (42.7%) (37.1, 48.4) 253 (82.4%) (77.7, 86.5) 61 (39.4%) (31.6, 47.5) 118 (76.1%) (68.6, 82.6) 11

Summary of Adverse Events - Safety Population Combination Arm Control Arm Subjects Who Received Any Amount of Study Medication (n=299) n, % (n=141) n, % Pre-Treatment Period Any Adverse Events 10 (3.3%) 2 (1.4%) Any Serious Adverse Events 1 (0.3%) 0 (0.0%) Any Grade 3/4/5 AEs 1 (0.3%) 0 (0.0%) Randomized Treatment Period Any Adverse Events 296 (99.0%) 139 (98.6%) Rocapuldencel-T Related AEs 174 (58.2%) - Standard of Care Related AEs 285 (95.3%) 134 (95.0%) Any Grade 3/4/5 AEs 214 (71.6%) 98 (69.5%) Rocapuldencel-T Related Grade 3/4/5 AEs 6 (2.0%) - Standard of Care Related Grade 3/4/5 AEs 144 (48.2%) 74 (52.5%) Deaths 19 (6.4%) 7 (5.0%) 12

Rationale For Continuing ADAPT and Longer Term Survival Follow-up Potential for delayed treatment effect (tail-of-curve) Rocapuldencel-T induces long-term memory immune responses >50% of subjects censored in both treatment groups at interim analysis 98% of censored subjects remained alive Interim analyses may not fully capture the potential benefit of an active immunotherapy due to insufficient long-term follow-up 1 Limited survival follow-up at time of interim analysis: median of 20 months Longer follow-up may provide useful information to identify a potential beneficial effect of rocapuldencel-t Censoring may impact assessment of both median survival and potential tail-of-curve effect (1) TT Chen Statistical Issues and Challenges in Immuno-oncology; Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, 2013 Oct 21;1:18 13

Survival Probability Phase 2 Trial of Rocapuldencel-T Showed Survival Curve Inflection Point at ~18 Months* Overall Survival (months) *Amin A. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 2015 3:14 14

Overall Survival by Time of Randomization 1 1 st 33% randomized 102 46 1 st 66% randomized 205 51 All 100% randomized N Combination Arm Control Arm Delta Median OS Median OS % Censored N % Censored Months (Months) (Months) 307 52 30.1 (23.3, -) 30.4 (24.8,-) 27.7 (23.0, 35.9) 52 40 103 50 155 56 22.2 (17.2, -) 32.4 (21.7, -) 32.4 (22.5, -) +7.9-2.0-4.7 Hazard Ratio 0.88 (0.56, 1.36) 0.98 (0.70, 1.37) 1.10 (0.83, 1.46) Benefit in median overall survival (combination arm vs. control arm) seen in subjects with longest survival follow-up Suggests interim analysis of median overall survival may be premature (1) Median overall survival estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology based upon data cut-off as of February 3, 2017 15

Survival Probability Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Overall Survival in Tertile 1 Hazard Ratio 0.88 Combination Arm (n=102) mos= 30.1 mo Standard-of-Care Treatment Arm (n=52) mos= 22.2 mo Overall Survival (months) 16

Survival Probability Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Overall Survival with Tumor Response Rocapuldencel-T Arm: OS Correlates with Tumor Response CR/PR Progressive disease Stable disease Not evaluable 17 Overall Survival (months)

Duration of Response (PR/CR) is Longer in Combination Arm And Suggests a Flattening of the Progression Curve More patients experience objective tumor response in combination vs. control (42% vs. 39%) Patients in the combination arm had more durable tumor response (median 8.4 vs 6.3 months) Percent of Patients Remaining Progression-Free After Initial Response (by KM estimate) 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Combination Arm (n=131) Control Arm (n=61) > 1 2 > 1 8 > 2 4 > 3 0 > 3 6 Months from Initial Response (CR/PR) * * None of the patients remaining progression free had reached 36 months 18

Survival Probability Greater Increase in Antigen-Specific Memory T Cells* above Baseline after 7 Doses Associated with Improved Survival Increase of antigen-specific memory T cells correlates with OS after 7 doses (Spearman s Rho=0.33, p<0.0021) 7 th dose administered at week 36 and analysis conducted at week 48 Median increase =6085 cells/ml <Median: N=41 (73% censored) Median: N=42 (81% censored) Top one-third: N=27 (93% censored) Overall Survival (months) *Memory T cells defined as CD8+CD28+CD45RA- cells reactive with antigens encoded by autologous tumor RNA Analysis includes 83 patients who received at least 7 doses out of the 117 patients analyzed for immune response. 19

Survival Probability Antigen-Specific Memory T Cells are Present at Baseline But Do Not Correlate with OS OS vs IM at Baseline (N=127, 65% censored): Above the Median vs Below the Median Median #Cells/ml=5338 Greater number of baseline antigen-specific memory T cells NOT associated with greater OS Overall Survival (months) 20

Summary Analysis of the immune response data shows a clear correlation with the MoA of rocapuldencel-t and survival outcomes At the time of the interim analysis, the median OS favors the control arm, but the data is immature Median follow-up of 20 months and >50% of patients still censored Longest mos seen for SoC in any study of patients with intermediate and poor risk Study remains open following discussion of the data with the FDA regarding potential tailof-the-curve effect IL-12, Tregs and other biomarker analyses are ongoing to identify a prospective biomarker to be used in the future development of rocapuldencel-t Next data update planned at 290 events expected in 1H 2018 21

Acknowledgements We would like to thank all of our investigators, nurses, study coordinators, operations staff and most importantly, our participating patients and their families at sites in the following countries: Canada (9) Czech Republic (6) Hungary (3) Israel (9) Italy (3) Spain (9) United Kingdom (6) United States (110)