CASE: H, M DRS. D/B F (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.5 SKEL: 9.0 RMO VISUAL NORMS X: 07/12/ R: 04/26/2011 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2011

Similar documents
CASE: H, Z DRS. D/B M (CA) Caucasian AGE: 10.7 SKEL: 12.2 RMO VISUAL NORMS X: 12/10/ R: 04/26/2011 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2011

CASE: HISPANIC SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (LA) Latin AGE: 10.5 VISUAL NORMS RMO X: 06/23/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2003

CASE: EXTRACTION Dr. TRAINING M (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.6 VISUAL NORMS RMO X: 02/06/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2003

RMO VISUAL NORMS. CASE: CHINESE SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (CH) Chinese AGE: 12.4 X: 09/30/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH

RMO Data Services FOREWORD

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC BOARD

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

Arrangement of the artificial teeth:

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Treatment of Class II non-extraction using the Bioprogressive method

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Changes in longitudinal craniofacial growth in subjects with normal occlusions using the Ricketts analysis

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Early Mixed Dentition Period

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

#45 Ortho-Tain, Inc PREVENTIVE ERUPTION GUIDANCE -- PREVENTIVE OCCLUSAL DEVELOPMENT

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

Dr Robert Drummond. BChD, DipOdont Ortho, MChD(Ortho), FDC(SA) Ortho. Canad Inn Polo Park Winnipeg 2015

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN BOARD OF ORTHODONTISTS APPENDIX 1 CASE PRESENTATION 2005

Treatment of Angle Class III. Department of Paedodontics and Orthodontics Dr. habil. Melinda Madléna associate professor

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

Palatal Depth and Arch Parameter in Class I Open Bite, Deep Bite and Normal Occlusion

Orthodontic Treatment Using The Dental VTO And MBT System

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

ORTHODONTIC INITIAL ASSESSMENT FORM (OIAF) w/ INSTRUCTIONS

Treatment of Long face / Open bite

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Transverse malocclusion, posterior crossbite and severe discrepancy*

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Volume 22 No. 14 September Dentists, Federally Qualified Health Centers and Health Maintenance Organizations For Action

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

Removable appliances

Sample Case #1. Disclaimer

Archived SECTION 14 - SPECIAL DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS

Jefferson Cephalometric Analysis--Face and Health Focused

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

Mixed Dentition Treatment and Habits Therapy

APPENDIX A. MEDICAID ORTHODONTIC INITIAL ASSESSMENT FORM (IAF) You will need this scoresheet and a disposable ruler (or a Boley Gauge)

Maxillary Expansion and Protraction in Correction of Midface Retrusion in a Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient

Effect of Chronic Nasal Airway Obstruction on Maxillary Arch Form in Monozygotic Twins: A Case Report

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Compromised nonsurgical treatment of a patient with a severe Class III malocclusion

CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS CROWDING

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

Clinical Consideration Series. Dedicated to help you treat with confidence. Crowding.

ACTIVATOR: SIMPLE YET EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE FOR SKELETAL CLASS II CORRECTION: CASE REPORT... ABSTRACT:...

Anterior Open Bite Correction with Invisalign Anterior Extrusion and Posterior Intrusion.

The practice of orthodontics is faced with new

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

Correction of Class II Malocclusions in Growing Patients by Using the Invisalign Technique: Rational Bases and Treatment Staging

Early treatment. Interceptive orthodontics

Comparison of Skeletal Changes between Female Adolescents and Adults with Hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 Malocclusion after Orthodontic Treatment

Concepts of occlusion Balanced occlusion. Monoplane occlusion. Lingualized occlusion. Figure (10-1)

Maxillary Growth Control with High Pull Headgear- A Case Report

Corporate Medical Policy

Managing. Not on course. Unplanned reaction 9/15/2011. Possible Reactions. Probable Root causes. invisalign Aligner Tracking Issues

Research methodology University of Turku, Finland

Reliability of A and B point for cephalometric analysis

Case Report Unilateral Molar Distalization: A Nonextraction Therapy

Case Report Orthodontic Treatment of a Mandibular Incisor Extraction Case with Invisalign

Ectopic upper canine associated to ectopic lower second bicuspid. Case report

instruction. The principal investigator traced and measured all cephalograms over an illuminated view box using the standard technique described Tweed

ISW for the treatment of adult anterior crossbite with severe crowding combined facial asymmetry case

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

Efficacy of Nickel-Titanium Palatal Expanders

The following standards and procedures apply to the provision of orthodontic services for children in the Medicaid/NJ FamilyCare (NJFC) programs.

PATERN OF CEPHALOMETRIC ANALISYS AND DENTAL PROFILE IN A GIRL WITH PRADER-WILLI SINDROME

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

Morphology of an Anatomic Crown. By: Assistant Professor Dr. Baydaa Ali Al - Rawi

Orthodontics. Anomalies

Lower incisor extraction in an Angle class I malocclusion: A case report

Problems of First Permanent Molars - The first group of permanent teeth erupt in the oral cavity. - Deep groove and pit

Transcription:

CASE: 7587 55 H, M DS. D/B F (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.5 SKE: 9. X: 7// - : /6/ MISSING PEMANENT TEETH VISUA NOMS MO O C MO

CASE: 7587 55 H, M DS. D/B F (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.5 SKE: 9. X: 7// - : /6/ MISSING PEMANENT TEETH VISUA NOMS MO O C MO

MO Diagnostic Services MO, Inc. (8)58-888 PO BOX 999 Denver, Colorado 88 H, M MO Case Number: 7587 55 X-ay date: 7// Age: 8.5 Wrist: 9. eference: C C D Drs. D/B MO un date: /6/ Birthdate: /6/996 Sex: Female C C D - O T H O D O N T I C C O N D I T I O N S ATEA BEFOE TEATMENT FONTA BEFOE TEATMENT FACTO MEASUED CINICA CINICA FACTO MEASUED CINICA CINICA VAUE NOM DEVIATIONS VAUE NOM DEVIATIONS # - Appears on tracing FOM NOM # - Appears on tracing FOM NOM ======================= DENTA EATIONS ======================= ======================= DENTA EATIONS ======================= Molar elation. mm -. mm. * Molar elation eft (A6-B6) -. mm.5 mm -.8 Canine elation -. mm -. mm. Molar elation ight (A6-B6) -. mm.5 mm -.9 5 Incisor Overjet.7 mm.5 mm.9 #6 Intermolar Width (B6-B6) 58. mm 5. mm. ** 7 Incisor Overbite. mm.5 mm. 8 Intercanine Width (B-B).8 mm.6 mm -. 9 Mand Incisor Extrusion. mm. mm.6 # Denture Midline.9 mm. mm.6 # Interincisal Angle 8. dg. dg. * ====================== DENTA TO SKEETON ====================== ====================== DENTA TO SKEETON ====================== #8 A6 Molar Position to PTV. mm.5 mm -. 9 B6 to J-Ag eft.6 mm 5. mm -.9 # B to A-Po Plane -. mm. mm -.5 B6 to J-Ag ight.7 mm 5. mm -. A to A-Po Plane. mm.5 mm. # Denture to Jaw Midlines -.9 mm. mm -.6 # B Inclination to A-Po.5 dg. dg -. ** 5 Occlusal Plane Tilt. mm. mm. 6 A Inclination to A-Po 8. dg 8. dg. 7 Occlusal Plane to Xi.8 mm. mm.6 8 Inclination of Occl Plane 7.8 dg. dg -. * 5 B Inclination to FH 7. dg 65. dg.7 * ============== ESTHETICS - ips are open on X-ay ============== 9 ower ip to Esthetic Plane -.8 mm -. mm -. * Upper ip ength.9 mm. mm -. ip Embrasure to Occl Plane -. mm -. mm.8 58 Nasoabial Angle 6.5 dg 5. dg. ===================== NASOPHAYNGEA AIWAY ==================== 6 N-S-Ba 7. dg 9.6 dg -.5 6 Ba-S-PNS 6. dg 6. dg.5 85 Airway Percent 5.7 % 5. % -. 86 inder-aronson AD. mm.8 mm. 87 inder-aronson AD 6.6 mm 7. mm -. 88 Distance PTV to Adenoid 7.7 mm 9. mm -. Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

MO Diagnostic Services MO, Inc. (8)58-888 PO BOX 999 Denver, Colorado 88 H, M MO Case Number: 7587 55 X-ay date: 7// Age: 8.5 Wrist: 9. eference: C C D Drs. D/B MO un date: /6/ Birthdate: /6/996 Sex: Female C C D - S K E E T A C O N D I T I O N S ATEA BEFOE TEATMENT FONTA BEFOE TEATMENT FACTO MEASUED CINICA CINICA FACTO MEASUED CINICA CINICA VAUE NOM DEVIATIONS VAUE NOM DEVIATIONS # - Appears on tracing FOM NOM # - Appears on tracing FOM NOM ====================== SKEETA EATIONS ====================== ====================== SKEETA EATIONS ====================== # Convexity.9 mm. mm -. # Max-Mand Width eft -.9 mm -. mm -. * #5 ower Facial Height. dg 5. dg -. * #6 Max-Mand Width ight -.6 mm -. mm -. 8 Present Patient Height 5. in 5.5 in 7 Max-Mand Midline -. dg. dg -.5 9 Posterior face height 68. mm 9 Anterior face height. mm 9 Posterior/Anterior ratio 65.5 % 9 Saddle Angle 7.7 dg. dg -.8 * 96 Condylion-A point 8.6 mm 86.6 mm -.8 97 Condylion-Gnathion 5.7 mm.7 mm.8 95 Max-Mand Differential. mm.5 mm. 98 Menton-ANS 6.6 mm 6.5 mm. ======================== JAW TO CANIUM ======================== ======================== JAW TO CANIUM ======================== # Facial Depth 9.8 dg 86. dg. * Postural Symmetry -. dg. dg -. * # Facial Axis 9.7 dg 9. dg.5 #5 Maxillary Width (J-J) 6. mm 6.7 mm -.8 #6 Maxillary Depth 9. dg 9. dg. * #7 Mandibular Width (AG-GA) 7. mm 75.6 mm -.7 7 Maxillary Height 5.6 dg 5.9 dg. 8 Palatal Plane to FH. dg. dg.6 #9 Mandibular Plane to FH.9 dg 6. dg -. * 77 Ba-N-A 66. dg 6. dg. * 76 S-N-A 8. dg 8. dg.7 78 S-N-B 8. dg 8. dg. 69 A-N-B Difference. dg. dg. 75 Total Facial Height 5. dg 6. dg -. ** ====================== INTENA STUCTUE ====================== ====================== INTENA STUCTUE ====================== Cranial Deflection 9.8 dg 7. dg.9 # Nasal Width.9 mm.9 mm -.5 Cranial ength Anterior 5.5 mm 55. mm -. Nasal Height. mm. mm. amus Height (CF-Go) 55.6 mm 55. mm. 9 Facial Width 5. mm.8 mm. 6 amus Xi Position 75.5 dg 76. dg -. 8 Porion ocation (Por to PTV) -. mm -9. mm -. #5 Mandibular Arc.9 dg 5.9 dg. ** 5 Corpus ength 6.9 mm 65. mm -. Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

MO Diagnostic Services MO, Inc. (8)58-888 PO BOX 999 Denver, Colorado 88 H M MO Case Number: 7587 55 X-ay date: 7// Age: 8.5 Wrist: 9. eference: I N F O Drs. D/B MO un date: /6/ Birthdate: /6/996 Sex: Female P A T I E N T I N F O M A T I O N S I G N I F I C A N T C O N S I D E A T I O N S ============================= NAME ============================= CONDITION CCD FACTOS Patient name: H, M ========================== HOIZONTA ========================== Doctor name: D/B Age: 8.5 Class II malocclusion X-ay date: 7// MO Case Number: MO un date: /6/ ==================== MISSING PEMANENT TEETH =================== =========================== VETICA =========================== --------+-------- Skeletal Deep Bite 5 due to the mandible & palate 9 ======================= HEIGHT PEDICTION ====================== ========================== TANSVESE ========================== Wrist film age: 9. Current height: 5. inches Md arch wide compared to jaw 9,,7 Amount of adult growth achieved: 8.7 % Expected adult height: 6. inches ======================== AIWAY ANAYSIS ======================= If the patient is clinically diagnosed =========================== SYMMETY =========================== as a mouthbreather, observed mouthbreathing is probably not caused by adenoid blockage of the airway. ======================== BOTON ANAYSIS ======================= ==================== SPECIA CONSIDEATIONS ==================== Bolton 6 ratio:.778 Bolton ratio:.99 =========================== COMMENTS =========================== Skeletal age: 9. years Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

CASE: 7587 55 H, M DS. D/B F (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.5 SKE: 9. X: 7// - : /6/ MISSING PEMANENT TEETH TACING BEFOE TEATMENT MO 9/9 9/9 9/86 /6 / / /5 -/ 8/ / SHOTAGE EEWAY 7. MM 9. MM /6 MEASUED VAUE/NOM SIGNIFICANT CONSIDEATIONS CONDITION EASON Class II malocclusion Skeletal Deep Bite Adenoid blockage of the airway? due to the mandible & palate Probably not SHOTAGE.6 MM EEWAY 7. MM FACIA PATTEN: MID BACHYFACIA # FACTOS MEASUED VAUE NOM CINICA DEVIATION Interincisal Angle 8. dg. dg. * Convexity.9 mm. mm -. ower Facial Height. dg 5. dg -. * A6 Molar Position to PTV. mm.5 mm -. B to A-Po Plane -. mm. mm -.5 B Inclination to A-Po.5 dg. dg -. ** Facial Depth 9.8 dg 86. dg. * Facial Axis 9.7 dg 9. dg.5 Maxillary Depth 9. dg 9. dg. * Mandibular Plane to FH.9 dg 6. dg -. * Mandibular Arc.9 dg 5.9 dg. ** O C MO

CASE: 7587 55 H, M DS. D/B F (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.5 SKE: 9. X: 7// - : /6/ MISSING PEMANENT TEETH TACING BEFOE TEATMENT MO /5 / / 6/6 58/5 7/76 / MEASUED VAUE/NOM SIGNIFICANT CONSIDEATIONS CONDITION EASON Md arch wide compared to jaw FACIA PATTEN: MID BACHYFACIA # FACTOS MEASUED VAUE NOM CINICA DEVIATION Intermolar Width (B6-B6) 58. mm 5. mm. ** Denture Midline.9 mm. mm.6 Max-Mand Width eft -.9 mm -. mm -. * Max-Mand Width ight -.6 mm -. mm -. Denture to Jaw Midlines -.9 mm. mm -.6 Nasal Width.9 mm.9 mm -.5 Maxillary Width (J-J) 6. mm 6.7 mm -.8 Mandibular Width (AG-GA) 7. mm 75.6 mm -.7 O C MO

MO Diagnostic Services MO, Inc. (8)58-888 PO BOX 999 Denver, Colorado 88 H, M MO Case Number: 7587 55 X-ay date: 7// Age: 8.5 Wrist: 9. eference: G T N Drs. D/B MO un date: /6/ Birthdate: /6/996 Sex: Female ========== G U I D E T O A T E N A T I V E T E A T M E N T P A N N I N G ========== Probability of ower Third Molar Facial Pattern.9 C.D. (based on space available) Vertical Description MID BACHYFACIA Impaction Eruption Eruption Questionable Functional Auxiliary Appliances Function Headgear NOT INDICATED 6.% 7.%.% Activator NOT INDICATED Palate Separation INDICATED Convexity Objective educe. mm ower Arch ength Discrepancy (original arch) 6.6 mm Shortage Including useable leeway (E) space equired Tooth Effect on esulting * * * O W E A C H * * * Movement Arch ength Discrepancy --------------------------------------------------------- t:. mm Fwd. ower Incisor to Ideal t:.5 mm Fwd..7 mm Increase.9 mm Shortage Buccal Expansion to Ideal Arch Form. mm Increase.8 mm Shortage Incisors & Convexity to Cephalometric imit.9 mm Fwd. 5.8 mm Increase. mm Excess ower Molar Distal Movement. mm. mm Increase Not eqd * * * U P P E A C H * * * Movement of First Molar (non-ext.) equired for Class I. mm Distal esulting Expected Space for nd & rd Molars at Maturity (non-ext.) 7.9 mm equired Space for nd Molars 9. mm to. mm equired Space for nd & rd Molars 8. mm to. mm *** Indicated Treatment using Dr's Personalized Decision Program *** Upper Arch NON-EXTACTION ower Arch NON-EXTACTION ower Incisor Forward. mm Buccal Expansion Gain. mm ower Molar Movement Forward.9 mm Teeth Sizes: 6 5 5 6 TOTA SUM OF INCISO NOM Upper Arch :. 7.5 7.7 8.8 8.6.8.7 8.6 8.8 7.7 7.5.. 8.7 MM N/A ower Arch :.5 8. 8. 8. 7. 6.6 6.6 7. 8. 8. 8..5. 7.8 MM.5 Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

MO Diagnostic Services MO, Inc. (8)58-888 PO BOX 999 Denver, Colorado 88 H, M MO Case Number: 7587 55 X-ay date: 7// Age: 8.5 Wrist: 9. eference: W N Drs. D/B MO un date: /6/ Birthdate: /6/996 Sex: Female W O K U P A T I O N A E ====================== OIGINA CONDITION ====================== ================ EASONS FO OWE ACH DECISION =============== Facial pattern:.9 CD - Mild Brachyfacial Mandibular Arch ength Analysis ower arch form: Normal. Initial Conditions A. Original Arch ength.6 mm shortage Missing permanent teeth: --------+-------- B. Useable eeway Space 7. mm C. Total Initial Discrepancy(A+B) 6.6 mm shortage ower arch length discrepancy (AD).6 mm SHOTAGE. Maximum Permissible Arch ength eeway space 9. mm --- Increase(Within Doctor imits) Maximum use of leeway space 7. mm Due To: Total arch length discrepancy 6.6 mm SHOTAGE D. ower Incisor epositioning 8.5 mm increase E. Buccal Expansion. mm increase ======================= COMPUTE DECISION ====================== F. ower Molar Distal Movement. mm based on Drs. Doyle/Baker's individualized standards G. Total Possible Increase (D+E+F) 8.6 mm increase UPPE ACH: NON-EXTACTION. esultant Arch ength Discrepancy. mm excess Considering All Possible Arch Convexity change NONE ength Increases (C+G). esultant Computer Decision Non-Extraction OWE ACH: NON-EXTACTION 5. Work-Up Presented Is NON-EXTACTION ower incisor FOWAD. mm Extracted teeth Buccal Expansion GAIN. mm ================ EASONS FO UPPE ACH DECISION =============== --------+-------- ower molar FOWAD.9 mm. Convexity change. mm ===================== AUXIIAY APPIANCES =====================. Upper incisor tip movement for.7 mm forward overbite/overjet ideal to lower Activator: NOT INDICATED. First molar movement required. mm backward Palate separation: INDICATED Headgear: NOT INDICATED. First molar movement clinical limit 7. mm backward 5. Work-Up Presented Is NON-EXTACTION ======================== POST TEATMENT ======================== =========================== COMMENTS =========================== Pentamorphic arch form: Normal Arch length relapse:. mm Skeletal age: 9. years ower third molar probabilities (based on space available) Impaction: 6 % Marginal: 7 % Functional: % Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

MO SEQUENCES WOKSHEET PHASE I TEATMENT 7587 55 H, M F 8.5 / 9. /6/ NON-EXTACTION U P P E A C H ACTIVITY DESCIPTION MONTHS NOTES O W E A C H ACTIVITY DESCIPTION MONTHS NOTES PAATA EXPANSION DISTAIZE 6 INTUDE 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 DISTA 6 ADVANCE INCISOS 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 POST TX ECODS POST TX ECODS O MO C

H, M F 8.5 / 9. SEQUENCES WOKSHEET /6/ 7587 55 PHASE II TEATMENT NON-EXTACTION MO U P P E A C H ACTIVITY DESCIPTION MONTHS NOTES POGESS ECODS POST TX ECODS ETACT AND/O 5 AIGN/EVE BUCCA SEGS IDEA ACH FINA ACH 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 O W E A C H ACTIVITY DESCIPTION MONTHS NOTES ETACT AND/O 5 ETACT AIGN/EVE BUCCA SEGS POGESS ECODSIDEA ACH POST TX ECODS FINA ACH 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 O C MO

7587 55 H, M F 8.5 / 9. /6/ NON-EXTACTION TEATMENT DESIGN MAXIAY CHANGE CHANGE IN MAXIAY TEETH MO EXTACT PT. A MOVEMENT NONE. MM UPPE MOA CHANGE CHANGE IN MANDIBUA TEETH OWE INCISO OWE MOA FWD(T). FWD.9 MM MM WOKUP PESENTED Upper arch: NON-EXTACTION ower arch: NON-EXTACTION MISSING PEMANENT TEETH MANDIBUA GOWTH --------+-------- COMMENTS Skeletal age: 9. years OIGINA GOWTH W/O TEATMENT TEATMENT OBJECTIVE O C MO

7587 55 H, M F 8.5 / 9. /6/ NON-EXTACTION MINI VTO SUGGEST NOMA MO PEFOMED PENTAMOPHIC ACHWIE MO KEY FACTOS TOTA ACH ENGTH DISCEPANCY 6.6 MM SHOTAGE VETICA DESCIPTION EXTACT DATE 9 9 9-8 6 7 58 D D ODEED EXTACT DATE D D ODEED MAXIAY CHANGE CHANGE IN MAXIAY TEETH TX NOTES MANDIBUA GOWTH CHANGE IN MANDIBUA TEETH O C MO

MO Diagnostic Services MO, Inc. April 6, MODS Case #: 7587 55 Non-extraction Patient: H, M etter: ( 5) Dear DS. D/B: The enclosed workup calls for significant distal movement of the upper molar with minimal convexity reduction. Convexity reduction in this case could have adverse affects on the profile. We have done our best to provide you with comprehensive diagnostic information and a simulation of the likely treatment outcome. Clinical evaluation of the possibility of upper second molar impaction is advised. While a variety of approaches may be taken, some of the possibilities include: ) ight force headgear (which may cause some change at point A) ) Approaches using coil springs (e.g., Wilson distalizing modules) ) Upper arch extraction of bicuspids or second molars The chosen alternative will probably not affect the remainder of the diagnosis. If you have interesting solutions to similar cases, please let us know; other clinicians may be interested to try them. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, please contact one of our technical representatives. ocky Mountain Orthodontics PO BOX 999 Denver, Colorado 88 65 W. Colfax Ave. Denver, CO 8 (8)58-888

MO Diagnostic Services MO, Inc. April 6, TEMS AND CONDITIONS. This order is subject to acceptance by MO, Inc. Diagnostic Services ( MO ). Upon acceptance, this order becomes a binding contract on the terms and conditions set forth herein, which shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado. The Doctor/Buyer hereby submits to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of Colorado to resolve any dispute related to this contract.. Exclusion of Warranties: The following statements are applicable to the products or services provided: a) Tracing of the cephalometric head films is subject to personal interpretation and is dependant upon the clarity of the head film furnished by the Doctor/Buyer; b) Growth forecasts are statements of expectation. Individuals may differ greatly from forecasted values; c) Cephalometrics is a tool which does not constitute a complete diagnosis; and d) The materials and information provided by MO constitute an aid to the qualified clinician, not a diagnosis or treatment plan. Only a qualified clinician can develop a complete diagnosis and treatment plan. MO HEEBY DISCAIMS ANY AND A WAANTIES AS TO THE ACCUACY OF ANY TACING, GOWTH FOECAST, O TEATMENT, AND MAKES NO OTHE WAANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPESSED O IMPIED, APPICABE TO THE PODUCTS O SEVICES COVEED BY THIS CONTACT. MO SPECIFICAY DISCAIMS ANY WAANTY OF MECHANTABIITY O OF FITNESS FO A PATICUA PUPOSE APPICABE TO THE PODUCTS O SEVICES COVEED BY THIS CONTACT. THEE AE NO WAANTIES WHICH EXTEND BEYOND THE DESCIPTION ON THE FACE HEEOF.. The Doctor/Buyer bears all responsibility for final diagnosis and the results of treatment.. Services are performed in compliance with applicable State and Federal laws; including the applicable provisions of the Fair abor Standards Act, as amended, and of regulations and orders issued thereunder. 5. No liability shall result from delay in performance, or nonperformance, caused by circumstances beyond the control of the party affected; including, but not limited to, an act of God, fire, flood, war, government action, labor trouble, and the like. MO furnishes the materials and information to the Doctor/Buyer based upon representations made to MO by the Doctor/Buyer that he/she is a qualified clinician, i.e. that he/she has the requisite knowledge and experience to utilize this aid properly in developing a complete diagnosis and treatment plan. ocky Mountain Orthodontics PO BOX 999 Denver, Colorado 88 65 W. Colfax Ave. Denver, CO 8 (8)58-888