Clinical and radiological results of the stemmed Mc Minn cup in hip revision surgery

Similar documents
Management Of Acetabular Deficiency In Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Series Of 15 Cases

The Treatment of Pelvic Discontinuity During Acetabular Revision

RECOVERY. P r o t r u s i o

*smith&nephew CONTOUR

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. Protrusio Cage A COMPREHENSIVE ACETABULAR REVISION SYSTEM

Revision hip arthroplasty with S-ROM prosthesis: a study of clinical outcomes and implant stability

Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Buttress and Shim Augments Surgical Technique

ACETABULAR CUP SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Early results of Trabecular Metal augment for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty

Short-term Results of a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component for Massive Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision THA

ORIGINAL PAPER. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu Medical Center ABSTRACT

Case report: Pain L THR [ post THR 2 years; with history of trivial fall] Your Diagnosis?

Early complications after revision total hip arthroplasty with cemented dual-mobility socket and reinforcement ring

Bone Bangalore

Severe pelvic bone loss treated using a coned acetabular prosthesis with a stem extension inside the ilium

Managing Bone Loss in Acetabular Revision

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Stem

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, US.

Optimum implant geometry

CIRCUMFERENTIAL PROXIMAL FEMORAL ALLOGRAFTS IN REVISION SURGERY ON TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: CASE REPORTS WITH A MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP OF 20 YEARS

Management of Types III and IV Acetabular Deficiencies With the Longitudinal Oblong Revision Cup

Revision Total Hip Replacement

Principles of acetabular fixation in primary and revision hip arthroplasty Piotr Wojciechowski, Damian Kusz, Anna WAGNER

Cancellous Impaction Bone Grafting of Acetabular Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Pinnacle revision cup in acetabular surgery Results at 2 to 5 years

28 Surgical Technique

Templating and Pre Operative Planning 2. Preparation of the Acetabulum 4. Trial Sizing and Impaction of the Shell 5.

Arcos Modular Femoral Revision System

Early failure of total hip replacements implanted at distant hospitals to reduce waiting lists

REVISING THE DEFICIENT PROXIMAL FEMUR

Favorable outcome of total hip arthroplasty with insufficient bone coverage of the roof reinforcement ring: a case report.

Cotyloplasty in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for an Insufficient Acetabulum

TEN YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH NONCEMENTED REVISION SOCKETS. Lawrence D. Dorr, MD Zhinian Wan, MD

DESIGN RATIONALE AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Tantalum Augment in Patients with Paprosky III or IV Acetabular Bone Defects: A Minimum 2-year Follow Up Study

Manza Cup HA SURGICAL TECHNIQUE.

This publication is not intended for distribution in the USA. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Trabecular Metal Acetabular Restrictor and Augment

TRABECULAR METAL ACETABULAR RESTRICTOR AND AUGMENT. Surgical Technique

Duraloc CONSTRAINED LINER

Pelvic discontinuity

The optimal timing of baseline radiostereometric analysis of uncemented press fit cups

Trabecular Metal Acetabular Restrictor and Augment

Comparative Study of Peripheral Rim Fixation Using Jumbo Cup in Revisional Hip Arthroplasty

Hip Resurfacing System

The custom triflange cup

Continuing the Tradition. VerSys Heritage Hip System

KEY CHOICES AND TECHNIQUES IN REVISION THA AND TKA Step-by-Step Decisions

EXTENDED TROCHANTERIC OSTEOTOMY SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FPO EXTENSIVELY COATED FIXATION

PROCOTYL E Acetabular Cup System. Modular to Fit Patient s Anatomy. Versatile for Revisions.

TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT:

Optimum implant geometry

Fracture of an Acetabular Component Inserted without Cement: A Case Report

PLR. Proximal Loading Revision Hip System

Technique Guide Hip Resurfacing System

Metha Short Hip Stem System

Extensively Porous-coated Stems for Femoral Revision: Reliable Choice for Stem Revision in Paprosky Femoral Type III Defects

The use of morselized allografts without impaction and cemented cage support in acetabular revision surgery: a 4- to 9-year follow-up

This publication is not intended for distribution in the USA. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Enhanced Stability Constrained Liners. Design Rationale Surgical Technique

RM Philosophy Innovation based on clinical evidence.

Porous metal augments

FEMORAL REVISION IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Encina Taper Stem. Stinson Orthopedics Inc. 303 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 600 Redwood City, CA

Midterm Results Of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) In Developmental Dysplasia Of The Hip (DDH)

CAUTION Federal law (USA) restricts this device to sale, by or on the order of a physician.

Rx90 Total Hip System Acetabular Series

Cementless Acetabular Fixation With and Without Screws

DURALOC. Acetabular Cup System. Surgical Technique

Surgical procedure. METS Coned Hemi-Pelvis

One Stage or Two Stage

Bone Preservation Stem

ADDRESSING CLINICAL ISSUES OF CEMENTLESS HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Cement Polished Tapered Stems of 12/14 Taper. 96 mm 98 mm 104 mm 110 mm 116 mm 122 mm 128 mm. Ceramic Femoral Head. Outer Diameter

A 42-year-old patient presenting with femoral

HIP SYSTEM SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Reaching new heights. Comprehensive. Efficient. Simple.

Surgical Technique. Cup System

operative technique Kent Hip

Evaluating and Treating Acetabular Bone Loss with Pelvic Discontinuity

Combined Pelvic Osteotomy in the Treatment of Both Deformed and Dysplastic Acetabulum Three Years Prospective Study

PRODUCT RATIONALE & SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

FLH183 04/08. Biomet UK Ltd Waterton Industrial Estate Bridgend, South Wales CF31 3XA, United Kingdom. Tel. +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)

The aging epidemic is upon us. The baby boomer

Optimum implant geometry

Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: One mobile-bearing and one fixed-bearing

CLINICAL PAPER / ORTHOPEDIC

Design Rationale/Surgical Technique GRIPTION TF

Knee Revision. Portfolio

The Müller acetabular reinforcement ring still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years

Effect of Superior Placement of the Hip Center on Abductor Muscle Strength in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Management of Acetabular Fractures by Prosthetic Hip Replacement

ESC. Enhanced Stability Liners. Design Rationale & Surgical Technique

Dual Mobility System Surgical technique

PINNACLE REVISION CUP SYSTEM

The Leader in Orthopaedic Innovation

Navigation for total hip arthroplasty

HYDROXYAPATITE IN REVISION OF TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS WITH MASSIVE ACETABULAR DEFECTS

Optimizing function Maximizing survivorship Accelerating recovery

REFERENCES FEMORAL REINFORCEMENT. A unique combination of modular revision hip prosthesis with locking intramedullary nail

Transcription:

Acta Orthop. Belg., 2010, 76, 58-62 ORIGINAL STUDY Clinical and radiological results of the stemmed Mc Minn cup in hip revision surgery Pax WILLEMSE, Rene M. CASTELEIN, Paul L. P. A. BOM, Aart VERBURG, Cees C. P. M. VERHEYEN Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands Results with the stemmed McMinn acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty with acetabular defects have been scarcely reported. We report our experience and radiological outcome with the stemmed cup in three Dutch orthopaedic departments. Twenty four patients with a median age of 69 years were operated between 1999 and 2005. Immediate postoperative radiographs were evaluated and compared with those at follow-up. The center of rotation was restored in 75% of the hips. Adequate alignment was seen in 71%. The mechanical failure rate was 38%. The cup was removed because of sepsis in three patients. Two patients had a dislocation (1 chronic). After 5 years, definite radiological loosening of the prosthesis was noted in 4 patients. Keywords : McMinn cup ; stemmed cup ; acetabular reconstruction ; revision THA. INTRODUCTION Revision of a severely deficient acetabulum is a delicate task and is technically demanding (2,3,6,10, 13,14). The treatment of uncontained defects is usually conducted with reinforcement devices, structural bone grafts and meshes (6,8,13,14). The configuration of the stemmed McMinn acetabular component is based on the presumption that the iliopubic bar of the pelvis remains intact, even in major acetabular defects. This device provides conditions for initial stability and fixation without structural bone grafts and facilitates restoration of the original center of rotation. Literature is ambivalent on the results of this component (2,3,6,10). The aim of this study is to evaluate the initial experience and radiological outcome with the stemmed cup in three Dutch orthopedic departments. PATIENTS AND METHODS The stemmed McMinn component is a Tilastin alloy (Ti6, Al4, V) conical cup with a tapered fluted stem and a modular polyethylene insert (Link, Hamburg, Germany) Pax Willemse, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon. Department of orthopaedic surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. Rene M. Castelein, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon. Department of orthopaedic surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. Paul L. P. A. Bom, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon. Department of orthopaedic surgery, J Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands. Aart Verburg, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon. Department of orthopaedic surgery, Orbis Medical Center, Sittard, The Netherlands. Cees C. P. M. Verheyen, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon. Department of orthopaedic surgery, Isala Clinics Zwolle, The Netherlands. Correspondence : Dr. Cees. C. P. M. Verheyen, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Isala Clinics (Weezenlanden Hospital), PO Box 10500, 8000 GM Zwolle, The Netherlands. E-mail : c.c.p.m.verheyen@isala.nl 2010, Acta Orthopædica Belgica. No benefits or funds were received in support of this study

CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF THE STEMMED MC MINN CUP 59 Fig. 1. Postoperative AP radiograph of a hip after cementless revision arthroplasty with a modular W link femoral stem and a McMinn stemmed cup. Fig. 2 Follow-up AP radiograph of a hip revised with a cementless Wagner stem and a McMinn stemmed cup, which is loose and has undergone marked proximal migration. (fig 1). The cup outer surface is either macro porous or hydroxyapatite coated, the stem is not coated. External diameter (45/50/55 mm), insert (22/26/28/32 mm) and stem length (45/65/85) are variable. The design of the cup is based on the initial Ring cup that was implanted in the 1960s. The stemmed cup originates from the observation that the bone between ilium and ischium anterior to the greater sciatic notch is generally intact even in the severely deficient acetabulum. Pelvic discontinuity is therefore a contraindication for placement of this acetabular device. The stem of the uncemented component finds support in intact bone while the conical micro porous or HA-coated cup acts as a scaffold for the bone graft. All acetabular revisions or total hip revisions with the stemmed Mc Minn cup performed in three Dutch hospitals between 1999 and 2005 were collected. Patient records and peri-operative radiographs were searched for demographic data, initial diagnosis, prior surgery and scored for preoperative acetabular defects. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated and measurements were based on comparisons of the hip and pelvic radiographs carried out postoperatively and at follow-up. Good alignment was defined as anteversion measured on AP pelvis and AP hip, and inclination between 30 and 60 measured on AP pelvis. For an adequate restoration of the center of rotation the distal edge of the cup had to be less than 30 mm above the teardrop line. Loosening was defined as cranial migration of 5 mm, or rotation of 10 on the AP radiograph compared to the direct postoperative radiographs. Heterotopic periarticular ossifications were graded according to Brooker (7). Clinical and radiological assessment was conducted after 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, one year and annually thereafter. Patients were classified according to Charnley : A (unilateral hip problem, no additional impairment), B (bilateral hip problem, no additional impairment) and C (multiple joint problem, other problems that impair mobilisation). Based on preoperative radiographs and

60 P. WILLEMSE, R. M. CASTELEIN, P. L. P. A. BOM, A. VERBURG, C. C. P. M. VERHEYEN intraoperative observation, the acetabular defects were rated according to the AAOS classification. The surgical procedure involved a posterolateral approach and was performed by three experienced surgeons. After subperiostal exposure of the greater sciatic notch, a guide wire was passed from the acetabular centre into the bar of bone between ilium and ischium using an aiming device. Cannulated reamers were used to prepare the trajectory of the cup. The stemmed cup was subsequently implanted and morcellized bone grafts were packed around the external conical part. Patients were subsequently mobilized with gradually increasing weight bearing for 3 months and fully thereafter. All patients received peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis and 6-12 weeks thromboprophylaxis (either LMWH or acenocoumarol). RESULTS Twenty-four acetabular revisions using a stemmed cup were performed in 19 female and 5 male patients with a mean age of 69.5 years (39-86). Average follow-up was 4 years (range : 1-8). Revision of the acetabular component was indicated for aseptic loosening (18 cases), peri - prosthetic femoral fracture with aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (2), acetabular fracture with primary reconstruction (1), loosening of a protrusion shell (2) and recurrent dislocation (1). The femoral component was also revised in 11 of the 24 procedures, in nine cases because of aseptic loosening and in two after a periprosthetic fracture. According to the Charnley classification 11 patients were class A, 3 class B and 10 class C. Acetabular defects were graded type 2 in 9 cases, type 3 in 14 cases and type 4 (pelvic discontinuity) in one case. No patients were lost to follow-up. Seven patients had died from unrelated causes and had been asymptomatic until their last follow-up. Recent radiographs were compared to those made postoperatively. The immediate post-operative radiographs showed an adequate center of rotation in 18 hips (75%) ; in 6 cases the center of rotation could not be restored because of inadequate acetabular bone stock or perforation of the medial acetabular wall. Adequate alignment (inclination and anteversion) was seen in 17 cases (70%). In all the 6 cases in which the center of rotation could not be restored, the optimal inclination and anteversion could not be restored either. In one patient with correct center of rotation the inclination was inadequate (table I). At final follow-up, six patients had a radiologically loose acetabulum (fig. 2). Intra-operative problems with drill guide positioning occurred in six patients, resulting in penetration of the iliac bone. Three of these patients did not have an adequate position of the cup on post operative radiographs. There was no surgery related mortality. Despite reasonable results on radiographs the clinical outcomes were slightly better than expected in terms of pain and function. Persistent infection in three patients necessitated removal of the prosthesis, resulting in a Girdlestone situation. Two patients dislocated, one immediately postoperatively and one after 9 months as a result of migration of the acetabular component. After closed reduction the course was uneventful in the first patient ; in the second patient chronic dislocation was accepted. In 4 cases definite loosening was noted with migration of the cup ranging between 2 to 10 cm. The overall mechanical failure rate was 38% (9 of 24, including the dislocations) within the study period. DISCUSSION Inadequate bone stock is a major problem in revision acetabular surgery, and many treatment options are available. Cemented acetabular revisions are fraught with high failure rates (3,12,13) ; they may remain appropriate for the cavitary deficient acetabulum (2,3). The combination of impacted morselized allograft and cement has reportedly produced diverging results, depending on the degree of containment of the defect (3,12,13,14). Cementless acetabular components give satisfactory results but are not suited for the severely deficient acetabulum. Contra indications for the use of cementless ace - tabular components include lack of intrinsic mechanical stability, less than 50% host bone contact, radiation necrosis or pelvis discontinuity (11). Reconstruction rings are an option but results depend on the status of the rim and medial wall (1).

CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF THE STEMMED MC MINN CUP 61 Table I Patient # Center of Alignment FU (years) Migration Perforation Loosening rotation restored 1 Yes Good 6 No No No 2 Yes Good 6 No No No 3 No Not good 5 Yes No Yes 4 No Not good 5 Yes Yes No 5 Yes Good 3 No No No 6 No Not good 8 Yes No Yes 7 Yes Good 3 Yes No Yes + disloc 8 Yes Good 1 No No Yes 9 Yes Good 1 No No No 10 Yes Good 7 No No Yes 11 No Not good 2 Yes Yes No 12 Yes Good 4 No No No 13 Yes Good 1 No No No 14 Yes Good 1 No No No 15 Yes Good 4 No No No 16 No Not good 3 No Yes No 17 Yes Good 6 No Yes No 18 Yes Good 2 No No No 19 Yes Not good 5 Yes No Yes + disloc 20 Yes Good 5 No No No 21 Yes Good 4 No Yes No 22 No Not good 1 Yes No Yes 23 Yes Good 6 No No No 24 No Not good 0 No Yes Yes Eisler et al reported poor results with this stemmed acetabular component. They used the device in a limited number of type 4 defects (6). Badhe et al noted results that justified their continued use of the stemmed prosthesis (2,3). The reason for our poor results may be the high percentage of second and third revisions (20%). Each revision becomes more difficult and the number of septic complications increases. Although the McMinn cup is not designed for type 4 defects, we implanted a stemmed cup in a patient with a type 4 defect, which resulted in migration of the stemmed component. It is uncertain if perforation or partial perforation of the stem has influence on the outcome. In case of perforation it creates a problem with centralization of the acetabulum. We encountered intra operative problems with positioning of the guide wire in 6 cases, which was considered a learning curve effect. The iliac bone was penetrated, which probably resulted in a lack of primary iliopubic fixation. Adequate primary fixation was only achieved in 50% of the cases. Despite the poor radiological findings, the clinical results were acceptable considering the severity of the preoperative acetabular deficiency. Despite the small size of this series of patients, failure of the McMinn cup can be predicted in situations of massive destruction of the acetabulum, a second or third revision, perforation of iliac bone by the guide wire and inadequate positioning of the cup. It appears that no implant, even a stemmed acetabular component can give satisfactory results in type 4 acetabular defects. Suggestions to improve the McMinn prosthesis could be coating of the stem for better fixation in the iliac bone and additional holes in the shell for additional screw fixation.

62 P. WILLEMSE, R. M. CASTELEIN, P. L. P. A. BOM, A. VERBURG, C. C. P. M. VERHEYEN REFERENCES 1. D Antonio DA, Capello WN, Borden LS et al. Classification and management of acetabular deficiencies in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989 ; 243 : 126-137. 2. Badhe NP, Howard PW. A stemmed acetabular component in the management of severe acetabular deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg 2005 ; 87-B : 1611-1616. 3. Badhe NP, Howard PW. Partially hydroxyapatite-coated stemmed acetabular cup and nonstructural bone graft in the management of severe acetabular deficiency. J Arthroplasty 2000 ; 15 : 63-68. 4. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA et al. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg 1973 ; 55-A : 1629-1632. 5. Callaghan JJ, Savory CG, O Rourke MR, Johnston RC. Are all cementless acetabular components created equal? J Arthroplasty 2004 ; 19 : 95-98. 6. Eisler T, Svensson O, Murren C, Elmstedt E. Early loosening of the stemmed McMinn cup. J Arthroplasty 2001 ; 16 : 871-876. 7. Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakovski D. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2003 ; 85-A : 2358-2364. 8. Gustilo RB, Pasternak HS. Revision total hip arthro plasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1988 ; 235 : 111-119. 9. Johnson RC, Fitzgerald RH, Harris WH et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1990 ; 72-A : 161-168. 10. McMinn DJW, Grigoris P, Roberts P. A stemmed acetabular cup for complex hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1993 ; 75-B (suppl) : 123-124. 11. Nivbrand B, Karrholm J. Migration and wear of hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997 ; 12 : 904-912. 12. Ornstein E, Atroshi I, Franzen H et al. Early complications after 144 consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement. J Bone Joint Surg 2002 ; 84-A : 1323-1328. 13. Schreurs BW, Bolder SB Gardeniers JW et al. Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. A 15-20-year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg 2004 ; 86-B : 492-497. 14. Schreurs BW, Busch VJ, Welten ML et al. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than 50 years old. J Bone Joint Surg 2004 ; 86-A : 2385-2392.