Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Similar documents
Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty. Thomas Zeller MD Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg & Bad Krozingen, Germany

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

The Role of Lithotripsy in Solving the Challenges of Vascular Calcium. Thomas Zeller, MD

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

DISRUPT PAD. (( Data Summary )) DISRUPT PAD Data Summary SPL Rev. B 2016 Shockwave Medical Inc. All rights reserved.

Dealing with Calcification in BTK Arteries: Is Lithoplasty the Answer?

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC on behalf of KANSHAS 1 investigators; Tepe G, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Deloose K, Verbist J, Goverde P, Zeller T

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

The LIMBO trial: a RCT investigating adventitial dexamethasone infusion to prevent restenosis in BTK arteries utilizing a novel angiographic endpoint

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Importance of Thorough Vessel Preparation Followed By Anti- Restenotic Therapy: An Update from the DEFINITIVE AR Study

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

6-month 0utcomes of a Novel Sirolimus Coated DCB Technology Evaluated in SFA Thomas Zeller, MD University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen

ILLUMENATE FIH Direct DCB Cohort 12-Month Results

Klinikum Rosenheim Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

XPEDITE Clinical Study PaclitaXel-coated Peripheral StEnts used In the Treatment of FemoropoplitEal Stenoses

January 23, Vascular and oncological interventional radiology Paris Descartes University

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Efficacy of DEB in Calcification and Subintimal Angioplasty

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

The Lutonix BTK Clinical Trial Programme: Status Update and Real World Clinical Experience

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

TOBA Trial 12 months Results

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project

Angiographic dissection pattern and patency outcomes of post balloon angioplasty for SFA lesions -a retrospective multi center analysis-

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

Luminor DCB in femoropopliteal lesions

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

Are Drug-coated balloons Durable? Level 1 evidence review. Koen Keirse, MD Vascular Surgery, RZ Tienen Tienen, Belgium

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

Comparison Of Primary Long Stenting Versus Primary Short Stenting For Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease (PARADE)

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

Massimiliano Fusaro, MD on behalf of ISAR-STATH Investigators. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München Munich - Germany

BTK Intervention with Drug- Coated Balloons: Past Lessons and Future Exploration

EffPac - Trial: Assessment of the Effectiveness of DCB versus POBA in the SFA Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA

Intravascular Imaging Insights into the Mechanism of Action of Focal Force Balloon Angioplasty

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

The Freeway Stent Study: the 12 Months results highly favor the use of DEB in combination with stenting

PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL RESTENOSIS

Comparison of Angiographic Dissection Patterns Caused by Long vs Short Balloons During Balloon Angioplasty for Chronic Femoropopliteal Occlusions

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

MICHAEL R. JAFF, DO MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES. Medtronic Further. Together

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

Update on the OPTIMIZE BTK Trial. Marianne Brodmann, MD Division of Angiology Medical University Graz, Austria

Long-term results with interwoven nitinol stents vs. BMS vs. DCB

The latest generation DEB

IN.PACT AV Access IDE Study Full Baseline Data. Robert Lookstein, MD MHCDL New York, NY On Behalf of the IN.PACT AV ACCESS Investigators

Evolving Role of Drug-Eluting Stents In Complex SFA - Majestic Trial Data

Six Month Results of the Global BIOLUX P-III All-Comers Registry using Drug Coated Balloon in Infra-Inguinal Artery Disease

ISR-treatment The Leipzig experience with purely mechanical debulking. Sven Bräunlich Department for Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Vessel Preparation: What does it mean and what are the current tools? Lawrence Garcia, MD St. Elizabeth s Medical Center Boston, MA, USA

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy System treatment of calcified lesions: Intravascular OCT analysis

THE SCIENCE BEHIND DRUG COATED BALLOONS OUTCOMES

Contemporary use of DCBs, Ranger clinical trial and investigator sponsored research

Rationale and algorithm for below-the-knee acute gain optimization

Lutonix DCB in BTK Update on the BTK real world registry and RCT

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions

Vessel Preparation Prior to DCB and Stenting: How to Do It.

Real PTX RCT: 3 year data from a randomized comparison of DCB vs. DES in femoropopliteal lesions

Study of a Balloon-Expandable Covered Stent for Obstructive Lesions in the Iliac Artery

DCB level 1 evidence review

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

Patterns of Restenosis: A Core Lab-driven Assessment of SFA Restenosis and a Potential Shift to Unify Various Trials Lawrence A. Garcia, MD St.

Update on the role of drug eluting balloons

REACT Treatment Rationale and Clinical Evidence. ICI Meeting 5th of December 2017

2-YEAR DATA SUPERA POPLITEAL REAL WORLD

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

First time data release: Initial experience with the temporary Spur Stent System: DEEPER Trial first-in-man results Jihad A. Mustapha, MD, FACC,

Novel concept for drug delivery in infrapopliteal arteries The LIMBO trial

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

SFA CTO Lesion Management laser or directional atherectomy?

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

Balloon Expandable Covered Stents. Suddenly a Crowded Space

New Data to Shape the Era of Drug Elution in Peripheral Interventions

Outcome of DCB and PTA post stenting in occluded versus stenotic lesions subgroup analysis of the randomized Freeway Stent Study

Disclosures. Rational Selection of Endovascular Options for the SFA and Popliteal: What Works Where and for How Long?

The TANGO Trial: A phase II below-the-knee study investigating the adventitial micro-infusion of Temsirolimus after PTA or atherectomy

The Crack and Pave technique for highly resistant calcified lesions. Manuela Matschuck MD University Hospital Leipzig Department Angiology

Adventitial Drug Infusion to Prevent Restenosis

LUTONIX DCB in BTK Update on the BTK clinical program & single center experience

OCT Guided Atherectomy: Initial Results of the VISION Trial Using the Pantheris Catheter. Patrick Muck, MD

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

Transcription:

Final results of the feasibility study for the drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon of of femoropopliteal Femoropopliteal lesions lesions: (The ENDURE Trial) Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon (The ENDURE Trial) Dr. Andrew Holden Principal Investigator - ENDURE Study Auckland Auckland City Hospital LINC 2017 January 26 th 2017

Disclosure Final results of the feasibility study for the drug-coated Speaker name: Chocolate Touch PTA balloon of Andrew Holden femoropopliteal lesions I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: (The ENDURE Trial) X Consulting Clinical Investigator for Trireme Medical Employment in industry Dr. Andrew Holden Stockholder of a healthcare company Principal Owner of a healthcare Investigator company - ENDURE Study Other(s) Auckland City Hospital I do not have any potential conflict of interest

Chocolate platform for controlled inflation Pillows Nitinol Constraining Structure Grooves Uniformly distributes circumferential forces Shields vessel wall from torsional sheer stress caused by balloon unfolding Modifies plaques via pillows and grooves (stress relief)

Chocolate: Platform for controlled inflation Controlled dilatation to help reduce dissections, minimize vessel wall trauma and edge injury 1 Predictable: less dissection and less bailout stenting 2 Chocolate BAR interim results 3 Cadaver data on file at TriReme Medical, LLC

The Next Step: Drug-Coated Chocolate Chocolate platform for controlled inflation + Paclitaxel coating for improved long term results Controlled, predictable dilatation with unique pillows and grooves design Low rates of dissection and bail out stenting 20% greater drug-coated surface on Chocolate pillows, compared to samesized conventional balloon Paclitaxel, anti-proliferative agent clinically proven to inhibit neointimal hyperplasia 3 µg/mm² paclitaxel dose Crystalline paclitaxel coating with hydrophilic excipient, developed in collaboration with InnoRa GmbH

Chocolate Touch PTA Paclitaxel Coated Balloon: CE Mark approved in Europe ENDURE Study data IDE Study Approved in US Chocolate Heart PTCA Paclitaxel Coated Balloon: CE Mark approved in Europe Early first in human data

Data from the ENDURE Study An Evaluation of the Drug-Coated Chocolate Touch PTA Balloon

ENDURE Study Design 4 sites in Germany and New Zealand; Single-Arm Study Single or Tandem de novo lesion Total lesion length 150 mm RVD 4.5 6.0 mm Rutherford Grade 3-5 Clinical ATK: 30D 6MO 12MO DUS, QVA Clinical BTK: 30D 3MO 6MO 12MO DUS, QVA Treatment Strategy: No Pre-dilatation required Additional PTA balloon required if >30% residual stenosis, or, Type C or worse dissection Bail-out Stent permitted if >50% residual stenosis, or, flow-limiting dissection Study Endpoints: Late Lumen Loss Patency Rate Rate of Clinically Indicated TLR Survival Rate Amputation Rate Clinical Improvement

ENDURE Study Design 4 sites in Germany and New Zealand; Single-Arm Study Single or Tandem de novo lesion Total lesion length 150 mm RVD 4.5 6.0 mm Rutherford Grade 3-5 Clinical ATK: 30D 6MO 12MO DUS, QVA Treatment Strategy: No Pre-dilatation required Additional PTA balloon required if >30% residual stenosis, or, Type C or worse dissection Bail-out Stent permitted if >50% residual stenosis, or, flow-limiting dissection Study Endpoints: Late Lumen Loss 6 month angiography Patency Rate Rate of Clinically Indicated TLR Survival Rate Amputation Rate Clinical Improvement

ENDURE: Study Centers & Core Labs Investigator / Institution Prof. Gunnar Tepe Rosenheim Medical Center, Germany Dr. Andrew Holden Auckland City Hospital, New Zealand Prof. Thomas Zeller Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen GmbH, Germany Dr. Sebastian Sixt Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center, Germany Total Patients with two Target Lesions = 3 Patients 20 17 16 14 67 patients 70 lesions Core Labs: Angiographic: Yale University School of Medicine Core Lab - New Haven, CT Duplex Ultrasound: VASCORE - Vascular Ultrasound Core Lab - Boston, MA Interim Data are representative of available information as of 17 Sep 2015 Monitoring /data clean-up are incomplete Follow-up is ongoing

ENDURE: Population Overview Patient Characteristics Per patient Age Average (Range) 69 years (53-92 years) Male 60.6% (40/66) Diabetes 34.3% (23/67) Tobacco Use 78.5% (51/65) Calculated BMI Average (Range) 28.1 (17.7 42.2) History of Hypertension 86.6% (58/67) History of Hyperlipidemia 68.2% (45/66) History of Coronary Intervention 29.9% (20/67) (PTCA or CABG) Intermittent Claudication 95.5% (64/67) ABI (average) 0.66 ± 0.28 Rutherford Category * Rutherford 3 Rutherford 4 Rutherford 5 92.6% (62/67) 3.0% (2/67) 4.5% (3/67) Lesion Characteristics Core Lab Adjudicated Data (N=70) Pre-Dilatation Conducted 28.6% (16/56) Superficial Femoral Artery Popliteal Artery Calcification RVD Lesion Length (N = 69 + ) 92.9% (65/70) 7.1% (5/70) None to Mild Moderate Severe Proximal In lesion Distal 7.3 cm ( 1.5 16.5cm) 45.7% (32/70) 31.4% (22/70) 22.9% (16/70) 5.3±0.67 5.1±0.62 5.1±0.73 % DS (N=69 + ) 76.3% ± 19.1 Total Occlusions 33.3% (23/69 + ) Pre-treatment (N=69 + ) Post Treatment (N=70) Minimum Lumen Diameter 1.19 mm ± 0.97 3.97 mm ± 0.57 ( 0 3.2 mm) ( 2.5 5.6 mm)

ENDURE: Population Overview Patient Characteristics Per patient Age Average (Range) 69 years (53-92 years) Male 60.6% (40/66) Diabetes 34.3% (23/67) Tobacco Use 78.5% (51/65) Calculated BMI Average (Range) 28.1 (17.7 42.2) History of Hypertension 86.6% (58/67) History of Hyperlipidemia 68.2% (45/66) History of Coronary Intervention 29.9% (20/67) (PTCA or CABG) Intermittent Claudication 95.5% (64/67) ABI (average) 0.66 ± 0.28 Rutherford Category * Rutherford 3 Rutherford 4 Rutherford 5 92.6% (62/67) 3.0% (2/67) 4.5% (3/67) Lesion Characteristics Core Lab Adjudicated Data (N=70) Pre-Dilatation Conducted 28.6% (16/56) Superficial Femoral Artery Popliteal Artery Calcification RVD Lesion Length (N = 69 + ) 92.9% (65/70) 7.1% (5/70) None to Mild Moderate Severe Proximal In lesion Distal 7.3 cm ( 1.5 16.5cm) 45.7% (32/70) 31.4% (22/70) 22.9% (16/70) 5.3±0.67 5.1±0.62 5.1±0.73 % DS (N=69 + ) 76.3% ± 19.1 Total Occlusions 33.3% (23/69 + ) Pre-treatment (N=69 + ) Post Treatment (N=70) Minimum Lumen Diameter 1.19 mm ± 0.97 3.97 mm ± 0.57 ( 0 3.2 mm) ( 2.5 5.6 mm) Severe calcifications and CTOs significantly higher than other DCB trials

ENDURE: Procedural Review Core Lab Adjudicated Data (N=70) Adjudicated Flow Limiting Dissections (0 / 69^) Adjudicated >50% Diameter Stenosis Adjudicated Bail-out Stenting* Per protocol stent was permitted with flow-limiting dissection or >50% stenosis 1.4% (1/69^) 1.4% (1/69^) Technical Success (ability to deliver and inflate Chocolate Touch balloon) 100% Device Success (<30% residual stenosis without flow limiting dissection) 77%* Procedural success (device success without protocol driven bailout stenting) 98.6% This study did not require pre-dilatation The IN.Pact global registry, which also did not require pre-dilatation, reported 24.7% provisional stenting. Many other DCB studies exclude suboptimal pre-dilatation outcomes from enrollment * Undersizing of Chocolate Touch (<1:1, DCB:RVD) contributed in cases where device success was not achieved

ENDURE: Procedural Review Core Lab Adjudicated Data (N=70) Adjudicated Flow Limiting Dissections (0 / 69^) Adjudicated >50% Diameter Stenosis Adjudicated Bail-out Stenting* Per protocol stent was permitted with flow-limiting dissection or >50% stenosis 1.4% (1/69^) 1.4% (1/69^) Technical Success (ability to deliver and inflate Chocolate Touch balloon) 100% Device Success (<30% residual stenosis without flow limiting dissection) 77%* Procedural success (device success without protocol driven bailout stenting) 98.6% This study did not require pre-dilatation The IN.Pact global registry, which also did not require pre-dilatation, reported 24.7% provisional stenting. Many other DCB studies exclude suboptimal pre-dilatation outcomes from enrollment * Undersizing of Chocolate Touch (<1:1, DCB:RVD) contributed in cases where device success was not achieved

ENDURE: Primary Endpoint LLL at 6 Month Late Lumen Loss Compared to other Drug-Coated Balloons N=49 Mean 0.16 Std Dev ±0.72 Based upon Angiogram QVA analysis by the QVA Corelab (Yale University, New Haven, CT ) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0-0.1-0.01 IN.PACT Chocolate Touch 0.16 0.16 Lutonix 0.45 Stellarex 0.54 Based on: PACIFIER Study (IN.Pact) ENDURE Study (Chocolate Touch ) LEVANT I Study (Lutonix) ILLUMENTAE Study (Stellarex)

ENDURE: 12 Month Patency Patency (%) Chocolate Touch DCB IDE Study 12 Month Patency 89.9% 77.1% In.Pact DCB IDE Study 12 Month Patency Primary Patency Through 390 Days 89.8% 78.4% Log-rank p<0.001 68.6% 49.5%

ENDURE: 12 Month Patency Patency (%) Chocolate Touch DCB IDE Study 12 Month Patency 89.9% 77.1% In.Pact DCB IDE Study 12 Month Patency Primary Patency Through 390 Days 89.8% 78.4% Log-rank p<0.001 68.6% 49.5%

Case Study # 1 69 year old male Right leg claudication, Rutherford 3 95mm long CTO/critical stenosis Stent-like appearances after primary treatment with 6.0mm X 120mm Chocolate Touch DCB

Case Study # 2 82 year old female Right leg rest pain, Rutherford 4 Diffuse RSFA and above knee popliteal artery stenotic disease RVD 4.0-4.5mm

Case Study #2 - Outcome Case Study # 2 Proximal lesion primarily dilated with 5.0mm X 80mm Chocolate DCB Excellent result

Case Study #2 - Outcome Case Study # 2 Distal lesion primarily dilated with 4.5mm X 80mm Chocolate DCB Excellent result

Case Study #2 - Outcome Case Study # 2 Patient doing well clinically @ 6 months No significant restenosis on 6 month DSA

Conclusions Chocolate s low trauma mechanism achieves excellent procedural outcomes resulting in a low rate of bail-out stent use The combination of the Chocolate platform with paclitaxel (neointimal suppression for good long-term results) offers the potential to avoid stents almost entirely In ENDURE, the Drug-Coated Chocolate Touch: achieved a low residual diameter stenosis and no flow limiting dissections resulting in an extremely low rate of per protocol bailout stenting shows promising evidence of the drug effect by way of high 12 month patency and low late lumen loss at 6 months

Final results of the feasibility study for the drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon of of femoropopliteal Femoropopliteal lesions lesions: (The ENDURE Trial) Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon (The ENDURE Trial) Dr. Andrew Holden Principal Investigator - ENDURE Study Auckland Auckland City Hospital LINC 2017 January 26 th 2017