Hepatitis C: How sick can we treat? Robert S. Brown, Jr., MD, MPH Vice Chair, Transitions of Care Interim Chief, Division of

Similar documents
SOLAR-1 (Cohorts A and B)

HCV Management in Decompensated Cirrhosis: Current Therapies

SOLAR-1 (Cohorts A and B)

HCV-G3: Sofosbuvir with ledipasvir or daclatasvir?

VIRAL LIVER DISEASE. OAG Post DDW Course Westin Prince, Toronto, June 13-14, 2015

DAAs in the era of decompensated liver disease. Piero L. Almasio University of Palermo

Antiviral treatment in HCV cirrhotic patients on waiting list

IL TRAPIANTO DI FEGATO: QUALE FUTURO CON LE NUOVE TERAPIE PER LE MALATTIE EPATICHE?

HEPATITIS WEB STUDY. Treatment of Hepatitis C following Liver Transplantation

Hepatitis C in Special Populations

Hepatitis C: New Antivirals in the Liver Transplant Setting. Maria Carlota Londoño Liver Unit Hospital Clínic Barcelona

Treating HCV After Liver Transplantation: What are the Treatment Options?

Treating now vs. post transplant

Transformation of Chronic Hepatitis C Treatment

Learning Objective. After completing this educational activity, participants should be able to:

HCV TREATMENT PRE- AND POST TRANSPLANTATION

Treatment of recurent hepatitis infection after liver transplantation

HCV Treatment in 2016

Patients with Cirrhosis: Managing the HCV Peri-Transplant Patient

Approved regimens for cirrhotic patients

Management of HCV in Decompensated Liver Disease

HCV: Current SOTA of Management of Treatment Experienced Patients

Treatment of Hepatitis C Recurrence after Liver Transplantation. Maria Carlota Londoño Liver Unit Hospital Clínic Barcelona

TREATMENT OF HCV DECOMPENSATED CIRRHOSIS

Saeed Hamid, MD Alex Thompson, MD, PhD

Hepatitis C: Difficult-to-treat Patients 11th Paris Hepatology Conference 16th January 2018 Stefan Zeuzem, MD University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany

5/12/2016. Learning Objectives. Management of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2 or 3 Infected Treatment-Naive or Experienced Patients

Case 4: A 61-year-old man with HCV genotype 3 with cirrhosis. Ira M. Jacobson, M.D. Weill Cornell Medical College New York, New York USA

Stick or twist management options in hepatitis C

TREATMENT OF HEPATITIS C IN THE LIVER TRANSPLANT SETTING. Dra. Zoe Mariño Liver Unit. Hospital Clinic Barcelona

DAA-based treatment in cirrhotic and post-transplanted patients. Audrey Coilly, MD Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France

Future strategies with new DAAs

Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir (Harvoni)

HCV Treatment Failure: What Next? Dr Ashley Brown, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London

How to optimize treatment in G3 patients? Jérôme GOURNAY, MD Hépatologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes France

The ASTRAL Program Abstracts LB-2, LB-12, 205, 209

Expert Perspectives: Best of HCV from EASL 2015

47 th Annual Meeting AISF

HCV Infection: EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines Francesco Negro University Hospital Geneva Switzerland

Why make this statement?

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2

Recurrent HCV after a Pre-LTx Course of SOF/DAC:

HCV care after cure. This program is supported by educational grants from

Hepatitis C: Management of Previous Non-responders with First Line Protease Inhibitors

Next generation DAAs: Combining efficacy and safety profile. Jiannis Vlachogiannakos

Update on Real-World Experience With HARVONI

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Cirrhotic Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 EXPEDITION-1

Treatment of Unique Populations Raymond T. Chung, MD

HCV In 2015: Maximizing SVR

Dr. Siddharth Srivastava

Treating HCV Prior to Liver Transplantation. What Are the Treatment Options? Xavier Forns Liver Unit Hospital Clinic, CIBEREHD, IDIBAPS Barcelona

Latest Treatment Updates for GT 2 and GT 3 Patients

Pivotal New England Journal of Medicine papers 2014 Phase 3 Trial data

Transplantation. Professor Didier. Centre Hépatobiliaire, Hépatobiliaire, C.H.B.

Experience with pre-transplant antiviral treatment: PEG/RBV and DAA. Xavier Forns, MD Liver Unit Hospital Clínic IDIBAPS and CIBREHD Barcelona

SAVINO BRUNO, MD Director Internal Medicine and Hepatology Unit AO Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milano

IFN-free for Genotype 1 HCV: the current landscape. Prof. Graham R Foster

Treatment of HCV in 2016

Cost effectiveness of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir (Harvoni ) in combination with other medicinal products for the treatment of hepatitis C infection

Worldwide Causes of HCC

B C Outlines. Child-Pugh scores

Update on chronic hepatitis C treatment: current trends, new challenges, what next?

Patients must have met all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for participation in this study.

PEARL-I. Ombitasvir + Paritaprevir + Ritonavir +/- Ribavirin in HCV GT4. Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced

Hepatitis C 17 months experience with Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir (Harvoni)

Worldwide Causes of HCC

What Should We Do With Difficult to Treat HCV Populations?

Optimal Treatment with Boceprevir. Michael Manns

Gestione del paziente nel pre e post trapianto di fegato

Decompensated Cirrhosis

Treatement Experienced patients without cirrhosis. Rafael Esteban Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona

New York State HCV Provider Webinar Series

Case 2: A 71-year-old man with cirrhosis

Seyed Moayed Alavian Professor of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Editor in-chief of Hepatitis Monthly E mail:

Update on Real-World Experience With HARVONI

LEDIPASVIR/SOFOSBUVIR en el entorno del Trasplante hepático. Martín Prieto Castillo Unidad de Hepatología, Sº Medicina Digestiva HUP La Fe, Valencia

How do you optimize HCV Treatment for Cirrhotic Patients APASL STC Cebu

Ari Bunim, M.D. Director of Hepatology New York Hospital Queens Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College

Hepatitis C - results in real life

Multicenter Experience using Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir ± RBV to Treat HCV GT 1 Relapsers after Simeprevir and Sofosbuvir Treatment

Clinical Studies and Recent Real-World Data with Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir

Life After SVR for Cirrhotic HCV

Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-1 Trial

Management of chronic hepatitis C in difficult to treat patients and special groups

4/30/2015. Interactive Case-Based Presentations and Audience Discussion. Debika Bhattacharya, MD, MSc. Learning Objectives

Phase 3. Treatment Experienced. Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2. Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:

Hepatitis C Update on New Treatments

HCV Therapy in Liver Transplant Candidate

Terapie attuali. Eradicazione di HCV e nuove prospettive:

Genotype 1 HCV in 2016: Clinical Decision Making in a Time of Plenty

Learning Objectives. After attending this presentation, participants will be able to:

Patients with compensated cirrhosis: how to treat and follow-up

Hepatitis C Treatment 2014

Current Treatment Options for HCV Patients. Michael Manns Dept. of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology Hannover Germany

A One-day Scientific Conference: Updates on Hepatitis C Treatments along with Consensus on Management of Hepatitis C in Iran

Evaluating HIV Patient for Liver Transplantation. Marion G. Peters, MD Professor of Medicine University of California San Francisco USA

Meet the Professor: HIV/HCV Coinfection

Treatment of HCV infection in daily clinical practice. Which are the optimal options for Genotypes 2 and 3? Jiannis Vlachogiannakos

Tough Cases in HIV/HCV Coinfection

Transcription:

Hepatitis C: How sick can we treat? Robert S. Brown, Jr., MD, MPH Vice Chair, Transitions of Care Interim Chief, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology www.livermd.org

HCV in advanced disease In principle we would treat all HCV + patients f we had safe and effective Rx But efficacy declines as CPT increases And safety not well established Decompensated cirrhosis has high mortality and unless will substantially improve status HCV Rx unlikely to change outcome without transplant Thus therapy in advanced disease remains controversial 2

What does cure of HCV mean in decompensated disease? Decompensated cirrhosis: Is there a threshold where we cannot avoid a transplant? Should HCV+ patients defer and take a HCV+ organ? Will we put them in MELD purgatory with Rx?

NHS England Early Access Program (EAP) SOF+NS5A±RBV for 12 Weeks in 467 Patients with History of Decompensated Cirrhosis Foster, EASL, 2015, O002 GT 1 N=235 GT 3 N=189 Other GTs N=43 Total N=467 Mean age, years (range) 56.1 (29-76) 54 (36-75) 59 (36-81) 55.6 (29-81) Male gender, n (%) 174 (74.0) 131 (69.3) 32 (74.4) 337 (72.2) Treatment experienced, n (%) 107 (45.5) 88 (46.6) 25 (58.1) 220 (47.1) Liver transplanted, n (%) 27 (11.5) 15 (7.9) 5 (11.6) 47 (10.1) Past or present decompensated cirrhosis, n (%) 223 (94.9) 179 (94.7) 39 (90.7) 441 (94.4) CTP B, n (%) 161 (68.5) 121 (64.0) 27 (62.8) 309 (66.2) CTP C, n (%) 19 (8.1) 24 (12.7) 3 (7.0) 46 (9.9) MELD mean (range) 11.9 (6-36) 11.3 (6-24) 12.6 (6-36) 11.9 (6-36) Active ascites, n (%) 97 (41.3) 67 (35.4) 14 (32.6) 178 (38.1) Previous variceal bleed, n (%) 61 (26.0) 55 (29.1) 11 (25.6) 127 (27.2) Active encephalopathy, n (%) 41 (17.4) 34 (18.0) 5 (11.6) 80 (17.1) Treatment, n (%)* LDV/SOF+RBV SOF+DCV+RBV SOF+NS5A without RBV *Choice of therapy was at clinician's discretion 164 (35.1) 45 (9.6) 26 (5.6) 61 (13.1) 114 (24.4) 14 (3.0) 27 (5.8) 13 (2.8) 3 (0.6) 252 (54) 172 (36.8) 43 (9.2) 4

NHS England EAP: SOF+NS5A±RBV for 12 Weeks SVR12 in GT 1 Patients with History of Decompensated Cirrhosis 17/21 141/164 3/5 37/45 LDV/SOF LDV/SOF +RBV Majority of patients received RBV SOF+DCV SOF+DCV +RBV LDV/SOF±RBV for 12 weeks resulted in high SVR rates in GT 1 decompensated cirrhotics Foster, EASL, 2015, O002 5

NHS England EAP: SOF+NS5A±RBV for 12 Weeks SVR12 in GT 3 Patients with History of Decompensated Cirrhosis Foster, EASL, 2015, O002 3/7 36/61 5/7 80/114 LDV/SOF LDV/SOF +RBV Majority of patients received RBV SOF+DCV SOF+DCV +RBV SVR rates were comparable to those seen in other studies of SOF+NS5A±RBV for 12 weeks in decompensated cirrhotics 6

Changes in MELD Score NHS England EAP: SOF+NS5A±RBV for 12 Weeks MELD Improvement in GT 1 and 3 Patients with History of Decompensated Cirrhosis 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 -20 n = 131 Non-transplanted Transplanted on treatment Number of Patients n = 33 n = 53 Improvement of > 2 MELD scores was observed in 41% by FU Week 4 and 48% had no significant changes Foster, EASL, 2015, O002 Comparative MELD scores available for 217 patients 7

NHS England EAP: SOF+NS5A±RBV for 12 Weeks in Decompensated Cirrhosis Serious Adverse Events by Follow-Up Week 4 Number of events (% of total SAEs) Number of patients (% of total population) Total SAEs 175 119 (25.5%) Likely related to liver disease and/or HCV treatment Likely unrelated to liver disease and/or HCV treatment 138 (78.9%) 100 (21.4%) 37 (21.1%) 37 (7.9%) Ascites 55 (31.4%) 38 (8.1%) Hepatic encephalopathy 28 (16%) 23 (4.9%) Variceal bleed 6 (3.4%) 6 (1.3%) Infection 26 (14.9%) 23 (4.9%) Liver transplantation 16 (3.4%) New HCC 7 (1.5%) Discontinuation of DAAs 42 (9%) Deaths 14 (3.0%) 12 weeks SOF+NS5A ± RBV was generally well tolerated Foster, EASL, 2015, O002 8

SOLAR-2 LDV/SOF+RBV for 12 or 24 Weeks in 329 Decompensated and Post-Liver Transplant HCV GT 1 and GT 4 Patients Week 0 12 24 36 Pre-Transplant CTP B (7 9) CTP C (10 12) Fibrosis (F0 F3) LDV/SOF + RBV SVR12 CTP A (5 6) Post-Transplant CTP B (7 9) LDV/SOF + RBV SVR12 CTP C (10 12) FCH Broad inclusion criteria: No hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) Total bilirubin 10 mg/dl, Hemoglobin 10 g/dl CrCl 40 ml/min, Platelets > 30,000/mL RBV dosing F0 F3 and CTP A cirrhosis: weight-based (< 75 kg = 1000 mg; 75 kg = 1200 mg) CTP B and C cirrhosis: dose escalation, 600 1200 mg/d Manns, EASL, 2015, GO2 9

SOLAR-2: LDV/SOF + RBV in Decompensated and Post-Liver Transplant Patients Demographics Post-Transplant Pre/Post-Transplant Patients, n (%) Manns, EASL, 2015, GO2 12 Weeks n=86 F0 F3 + CTP A 24 Weeks n=82 12 Weeks n=78 CTP B + CTP C 24 Weeks n=82 Median age, y (range) 58 (32 73) 60 (44 74) 58 (27 76) 58 (23 79) Male, n (%) 69 (80) 65 (79) 55 (71) 59 (72) Median HCV RNA, log 10 IU/mL (range) 6.5 (3.8 7.5) 6.5 (4.7 7.4) 6.0 (3.7 7.1) 5.9 (3.4 7.4) GT, n (%) 1a 41 (48) 42 (51) 38 (49) 38 (46) 1b 34 (40) 30 (37) 33 (42) 35 (43) 4 11 (13) 10 (12) 7 (9) 9 (11) IL28B non-cc, n (%) 74 (86) 65 (79) 62 (79) 61 (74) Prior HCV treatment, n (%) 72 (84) 65 (79) 58 (74) 66 (80) MELD > 15, n (%) 0 0 22 (28) 19 (23) Median total bilirubin, mg/dl (range) 0.8 (0.2-13.7) 0.8 (0.2-2.2) 2.3 (0.3-8.9) 2.3 (0.3-11.2) Median albumin, g/dl (range) 4.0 (2.8-4.8) 3.9 (3.1-4.6) 2.8 (1.9-4.2) 2.9 (1.9-3.8) Median INR (range) 1.0 (0.9-3.7) 1.0 (0.9-2.1) 1.3 (1.0-2.1) 1.3 (1.0-2.2) Median platelets, x 10 3 /µl (range) 142 (35-434) 134 (48-331) 77 (27-237) 80 (28-211) Ascites, n (%) 3 (3) 2 (2) 51 (65) 64 (78) Encephalopathy, n (%) 0 0 37 (47) 45 (55) 1 0

SVR12 (%) SOLAR-2: LDV/SOF + RBV in Decompensated and Post-Liver Transplant Patients Overall Efficacy Pre-Transplant in GT 1 LDV/SOF + RBV 12 Weeks 24 Weeks 20/23 22/23 17/20 13/18 CTP B CTP C SVR rates were similar with 12 or 24 weeks of LDV/SOF + RBV 27 subjects in the 24 week arm have not reached SVR12 7 subjects who were transplanted and 3 subjects did not meet inclusion criteria are excluded. Error bars represent 2-sided exact 90% confidence intervals. Manns, EASL, 2015, GO2 1 1

Change in MELD Score SOLAR-2: LDV/SOF + RBV in Decompensated and Post-Liver Transplant Patients Liver Function Change from Baseline to Follow-Up Week 4 MELD Score Change Pre/Post-Transplant (CTP B and C, n=136*) Change in CTP Class Baseline CTP (+8) A (5 6) n=73 B (7 9) n=100 C (10 12) n=54 n=95 n=18 A (5 6) 67 (96) 31 (35) 2 (5) n=22 Followup Week 4 CTP B (7 9) 3 (4) 57 (65) 20 (48) C (10 12) 0 0 20 (48) no assessment: CTP A, n=3; CTP B, n=12; CTP C, n=12 (-11) (-17) *Missing FU-4: n=24 Majority of patients showed improvements in MELD and CTP scores Manns, EASL, 2015, GO2 1 2

SOLAR-2: LDV/SOF + RBV in Decompensated and Post-Liver Transplant Patients Overall Safety Summary Post-Transplant F0 F3 + CTP A Pre/Post-Transplant CTP B + CTP C Overall Safety Patients, n (%) 12 Weeks n=86 24 Weeks n=82 12 Weeks n=78 24 Weeks n=82 AE 79 (92) 78 (95) 74 (95) 77 (94) Grade 3 4 AE 16 (19) 20 (24) 15 (19) 25 (30) SAE 12 (14) 12 (15) 22 (28) 23 (28) Treatment-related SAEs* 0 3 (4) 2 (3) 4 (5) Treatment D/C due to AE 0 1 (1) 1 (1) 4 (5) Death 2 (2) 1 (1) 3 (4) 4 (5) *Fall, anemia (5), vomiting, diarrhea, hyperbilirubinemia; edema, dehydration, HCC (2), type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperbilirubinemia. Regimen was safe and well tolerated with low D/C due to AE No deaths were considered treatment related Manns, EASL, 2015, GO2 1 3

SVR12 (%) Decompensated cirrhosis SOLAR 1 study Patients 108 GT 1 or 4 treatment naïve or experienced CPT class B or C Inclusion/exclusion Total bili <10 mg/dl Creatinine clearance >40 ml/min Platelets >30,000 x 10 3 /ul Design: RCT Regimen Ledipasvir + sofosbuvir Ribavirin 600 mg daily, titrated up if tolerated Duration: 12 or 24 weeks 100 80 60 40 20 0 12 weeks 24 weeks 87 89 90 86 26 30 24 27 CPT B 19 22 18 20 CPT C Charlton M. Gastroenterology 2015.

What does cure of HCV mean? SOLAR study MELD scores Charlton M. Gastroenterology 2015.

When/Who to Treat with Advanced Disease Summary Will all patients be HCV RNA (-) going into OLT? Patients treated earlier with SVR who develop HCC HCC upgrades, LDLT-Definite CPT B, MELD <15-Mostly CPT C, high MELD-Not at the current time,? Soon Will lower MELD and decrease risk of early recurrence post OLT but has decreased SVR and no access to HCV + livers What remains open is which patients can be treated and avoid transplant