CASE: EXTRACTION Dr. TRAINING M (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.6 VISUAL NORMS RMO X: 02/06/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2003

Similar documents
RMO VISUAL NORMS. CASE: CHINESE SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (CH) Chinese AGE: 12.4 X: 09/30/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH

CASE: HISPANIC SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (LA) Latin AGE: 10.5 VISUAL NORMS RMO X: 06/23/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2003

CASE: H, M DRS. D/B F (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.5 SKEL: 9.0 RMO VISUAL NORMS X: 07/12/ R: 04/26/2011 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2011

RMO Data Services FOREWORD

CASE: H, Z DRS. D/B M (CA) Caucasian AGE: 10.7 SKEL: 12.2 RMO VISUAL NORMS X: 12/10/ R: 04/26/2011 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2011

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Treatment of Angle Class III. Department of Paedodontics and Orthodontics Dr. habil. Melinda Madléna associate professor

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Changes in longitudinal craniofacial growth in subjects with normal occlusions using the Ricketts analysis

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Treatment of Long face / Open bite

Early Mixed Dentition Period

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

Arrangement of the artificial teeth:

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Angle Class I malocclusion with anterior open bite treated with extraction of permanent teeth

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

Comparison of Skeletal Changes between Female Adolescents and Adults with Hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 Malocclusion after Orthodontic Treatment

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC BOARD

Maxillary Expansion and Protraction in Correction of Midface Retrusion in a Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

Dr Robert Drummond. BChD, DipOdont Ortho, MChD(Ortho), FDC(SA) Ortho. Canad Inn Polo Park Winnipeg 2015

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

Regarding morphological differences of the maxillary anterior teeth of monozygotic twin sisters

Maxillary Growth Control with High Pull Headgear- A Case Report

Treatment of Class II non-extraction using the Bioprogressive method

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

EUROPEAN BOARD OF ORTHODONTISTS APPENDIX 1 CASE PRESENTATION 2005

PATERN OF CEPHALOMETRIC ANALISYS AND DENTAL PROFILE IN A GIRL WITH PRADER-WILLI SINDROME

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

Jefferson Cephalometric Analysis--Face and Health Focused

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

Sample Case #1. Disclaimer

ACTIVATOR: SIMPLE YET EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE FOR SKELETAL CLASS II CORRECTION: CASE REPORT... ABSTRACT:...

Effect of Chronic Nasal Airway Obstruction on Maxillary Arch Form in Monozygotic Twins: A Case Report

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

The practice of orthodontics is faced with new

Orthodontic Treatment Using The Dental VTO And MBT System

Skeletal And DentoalveolarChanges Seen In Class II Div 1 Mal- Occlusion Cases Treated With Twin Block Appliance- A Cephalometric Study

Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

Holy Nexus of Variable Wire Cross-section: New Vistas in Begg s Technique

Angle Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary dental protrusion and missing mandibular first molars*

Racial Variations in Cephalometric Analysis between Whites and Kuwaitis

Fixed appliances II. Dr. Káldy Adrienn, Semmeweis University

instruction. The principal investigator traced and measured all cephalograms over an illuminated view box using the standard technique described Tweed

Treatment of a severe class II division 1 malocclusion with twin-block appliance

Orthognathic treatment of facial asymmetry due to temporomandibular joint ankylosis

Concepts of occlusion Balanced occlusion. Monoplane occlusion. Lingualized occlusion. Figure (10-1)

A Cephalometric Comparison of Twin Block and Bionator Appliances in Treatment of Class II Malocclusion

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Ectopic upper canine associated to ectopic lower second bicuspid. Case report

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

Interdisciplinary Treatment of an Adult Patient Using an Adjunctive Orthodontic Approach. Case Report

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

Treatment of a Patient with Class I Malocclusion and Severe Tooth Crowding Using Invisalign and Fixed Appliances

Lever-arm and Mini-implant System for Anterior Torque Control during Retraction in Lingual Orthodontic Treatment

Different Non Surgical Treatment Modalities for Class III Malocclusion

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

Nonextraction Treatment of Upper Canine Premolar Transposition in an Adult Patient

mandibular deficiency and maxillary and mandibular crowding: follow-up evaluation

Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences

Compromised nonsurgical treatment of a patient with a severe Class III malocclusion

Adult Class lll Treatment Using a J-Hook Headgear to the Mandibular Arch

Reliability of A and B point for cephalometric analysis

Correction of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion by Fixed Functional Class II Corrector Appliance: Case Report

#45 Ortho-Tain, Inc PREVENTIVE ERUPTION GUIDANCE -- PREVENTIVE OCCLUSAL DEVELOPMENT

The effect of tooth agenesis on dentofacial structures

Ah-Young Lee and Young Ho Kim. 1. Introduction

Class II malocclusions are observed commonly in

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

Comprehensive Orthodontic Diagnosis Align upper and lower arches is not a treatment plan!

An Innovative Treatment Approach with Atypical Orthodontic Extraction Pattern in Bimaxillary Protrusion Case

Cephalometric Findings in a Normal Nigerian. Population Sample and Adult Nigerians with Unrepaired Clefts

Palatal Depth and Arch Parameter in Class I Open Bite, Deep Bite and Normal Occlusion

Non-surgical management of skeletal malocclusions: An assessment of 100 cases

Class III malocclusions are complex to MANDIBULAR CERVICAL HEADGEAR IN ORTHOPEDIC AND ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS III CASES

Anterior Open Bite Correction with Invisalign Anterior Extrusion and Posterior Intrusion.

Transcription:

O C RMO CASE: EXTRACTION Dr. TRAINING M (CA) Caucasian AGE:. X: // - R: // MISSING PERMANENT TEETH VISUAL NORMS RMO R L

RMO Diagnostic Services RMO, Inc. ()- Post Office Box ()- Canoga Park, CA - EXTRACTION RMO Case Number: X-Ray date: // Age:. Reference: C C D Dr. Training RMO Run date: // Birthdate: // Sex: Male C C D - O R T H O D O N T I C C O N D I T I O N S C C D - S K E L E T A L C O N D I T I O N S LATERAL BEFORE TREATMENT LATERAL BEFORE TREATMENT FACTOR MEASURED CLINICAL CLINICAL FACTOR MEASURED CLINICAL CLINICAL VALUE NORM DEVIATIONS VALUE NORM DEVIATIONS # - Appears on tracing FROM NORM # - Appears on tracing FROM NORM ======================= DENTAL RELATIONS ======================= ====================== SKELETAL RELATIONS ====================== Molar Relation -. mm -. mm. # Convexity. mm. mm. * Canine Relation -. mm -. mm -. # Lower Facial Height. dg. dg. * Incisor Overjet. mm. mm. * Present Patient Height. in. in Incisor Overbite. mm. mm -. Posterior face height. mm Mand Incisor Extrusion. mm. mm. Anterior face height. mm # Interincisal Angle. dg. dg -. * Posterior/Anterior ratio. % Saddle Angle. dg. dg. ** ====================== DENTAL TO SKELETON ====================== Condylion-A point. mm. mm -. Condylion-Gnathion. mm. mm. # A Molar Position to PTV. mm. mm. Max-Mand Differential. mm. mm. * # B to A-Po Plane. mm. mm. * Menton-ANS. mm. mm. * A to A-Po Plane. mm. mm. ** # B Inclination to A-Po. dg. dg. ======================== JAW TO CRANIUM ======================== A Inclination to A-Po. dg. dg. ** Occlusal Plane to Xi. mm. mm. # Facial Depth. dg. dg -. Inclination of Occl Plane. dg. dg -. # Facial Axis. dg. dg -. * B Inclination to FH. dg. dg -. * # Maxillary Depth. dg. dg -. Maxillary Height. dg. dg. ============== ESTHETICS - Lips are open on X-Ray ============== Palatal Plane to FH. dg. dg -. # Mandibular Plane to FH. dg. dg. * Lower Lip to Esthetic Plane. mm -. mm. ** Ba-N-A. dg. dg. Upper Lip Length. mm. mm. S-N-A. dg. dg -. * Lip Embrasure to Occl Plane -. mm -. mm -. S-N-B. dg. dg -. ** NasoLabial Angle. dg. dg -. * A-N-B Difference. dg. dg. Total Facial Height. dg. dg. * ===================== NASOPHARYNGEAL AIRWAY ==================== ====================== INTERNAL STRUCTURE ====================== N-S-Ba. dg. dg. * Ba-S-PNS. dg. dg. * Cranial Deflection. dg. dg. Airway Percent. %. %. Cranial Length Anterior. mm. mm. * Linder-Aronson AD. mm. mm. Ramus Height (CF-Go). mm. mm -. * Linder-Aronson AD. mm. mm. Ramus Xi Position. dg. dg -. Distance PTV to Adenoid. mm. mm. Porion Location (Por to PTV) -. mm -. mm -. # Mandibular Arc. dg. dg -. ** Corpus Length. mm. mm -. * Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

RMO Diagnostic Services RMO, Inc. ()- Post Office Box ()- Canoga Park, CA - EXTRACTION RMO Case Number: X-Ray date: // Age:. Reference: I N F O Dr. Training RMO Run date: // Birthdate: // Sex: Male P A T I E N T I N F O R M A T I O N S I G N I F I C A N T C O N S I D E R A T I O N S ============================= NAME ============================= CONDITION CCD FACTORS Patient name: EXTRACTION ========================== HORIZONTAL ========================== Doctor name: TRAINING Age:. Mild Overjet X-Ray date: // Skeletal Class II RMO Case Number: due to the mandible,,, RMO Run date: // ==================== MISSING PERMANENT TEETH =================== =========================== VERTICAL =========================== R --------+-------- L Skeletal Open Bite due to the mandible,, ======================= HEIGHT PREDICTION ====================== ========================== TRANSVERSE ========================== Assumed skeletal age:. Current height:. inches Amount of adult growth achieved:. % Expected adult height:. inches ======================== AIRWAY ANALYSIS ======================= If the patient is clinically diagnosed =========================== SYMMETRY =========================== as a mouthbreather, observed mouthbreathing is probably not caused by adenoid blockage of the airway. ======================== BOLTON ANALYSIS ======================= ==================== SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS ==================== Not Available - Upper and lower arch not analyzed =========================== COMMENTS =========================== No analysis of frontal x-ray. Upper and lower arch expansion decisions based on available data only. Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

CASE: EXTRACTION Dr. TRAINING M (CA) Caucasian AGE:. X: // - R: // MISSING PERMANENT TEETH TRACING BEFORE TREATMENT RMO R L / / / / / / / / / / / MEASURED VALUE/NORM R L SIGNIFICANT CONSIDERATIONS CONDITION REASON Mild Overjet Skeletal Class II due to the mandible Skeletal Open Bite due to the mandible Adenoid blockage of the airway? Probably not SHORTAGE. MM LEEWAY. MM FACIAL PATTERN: DOLICHOFACIAL # FACTORS MEASURED VALUE NORM CLINICAL DEVIATION Interincisal Angle. dg. dg -. * Convexity. mm. mm. * Lower Facial Height. dg. dg. * A Molar Position to PTV. mm. mm. B to A-Po Plane. mm. mm. * B Inclination to A-Po. dg. dg. Facial Depth. dg. dg -. Facial Axis. dg. dg -. * Maxillary Depth. dg. dg -. Mandibular Plane to FH. dg. dg. * Mandibular Arc. dg. dg -. ** O C RMO

RMO Diagnostic Services RMO, Inc. ()- Post Office Box ()- Canoga Park, CA - EXTRACTION RMO Case Number: X-Ray date: // Age:. Reference: G T E Dr. Training RMO Run date: // Birthdate: // Sex: Male ========== G U I D E T O A L T E R N A T I V E T R E A T M E N T P L A N N I N G ========== Probability of Lower Third Molar Facial Pattern -. C.D. (based on space available) Vertical Description DOLICHOFACIAL Impaction Eruption Eruption Questionable Functional Auxiliary Appliances Function Headgear HIGH PULL LIGHT FORCES for ANCHORAGE.%.%.% Activator NEUTRAL Palate Separation N/A - No Arch and Frontal data Convexity Objective Reduce. mm Lower Arch Length Discrepancy (original arch). mm Excess Including useable leeway (E) space Required Tooth Effect on Resulting * * * L O W E R A R C H * * * Movement Arch Length Discrepancy --------------------------------------------------------- Lt:. mm Bwd. Lower Incisor to Ideal Rt:. mm Bwd.. mm Decrease. mm Shortage Buccal Expansion to Ideal Arch Form. mm Increase. mm Shortage Incisors & Convexity to Cephalometric Limit. mm Fwd.. mm Increase. mm Shortage Lower Molar Distal Movement. mm. mm Increase. mm Shortage * * * U P P E R A R C H * * * Movement of First Molar (non-ext.) Required for Class I. mm Distal Resulting Expected Space for nd & rd Molars at Maturity (non-ext.). mm Required Space for nd Molars. mm to. mm Required Space for nd & rd Molars. mm to. mm *** Indicated Treatment using Dr's Personalized Decision Program *** Upper Arch EXTRACTION Lower Arch EXTRACTION Lower Incisor Backward. mm Buccal Expansion Gain. mm Lower Molar Movement Forward. mm Teeth Sizes: L L L L L L R R R R R R TOTAL SUM OF INCISOR NORM Lower Arch :.............. MM. Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

RMO Diagnostic Services RMO, Inc. ()- Post Office Box ()- Canoga Park, CA - EXTRACTION RMO Case Number: X-Ray date: // Age:. Reference: W R E Dr. Training RMO Run date: // Birthdate: // Sex: Male W O R K U P R A T I O N A L E ====================== ORIGINAL CONDITION ====================== ================ REASONS FOR LOWER ARCH DECISION =============== Facial pattern: -. CD - Dolichofacial Mandibular Arch Length Analysis Lower arch form: Normal. Initial Conditions A. Original Arch Length. mm shortage Missing permanent teeth: R --------+-------- L B. Useable Leeway Space. mm C. Total Initial Discrepancy(A+B). mm excess Lower arch length discrepancy (ALD). mm SHORTAGE. Maximum Permissible Arch Length Leeway space. mm --- Increase(Within Doctor Limits) Maximum use of leeway space. mm Due To: Total arch length discrepancy. mm EXCESS D. Lower Incisor Repositioning. mm decrease E. Buccal Expansion. mm increase ======================= COMPUTER DECISION ====================== F. Lower Molar Distal Movement. mm based on Dr. Training's individualized standards G. Total Possible Increase (D+E+F). mm decrease UPPER ARCH: EXTRACTION. Resultant Arch Length Discrepancy. mm shortage Considering All Possible Arch Convexity change REDUCE. mm Length Increases (C+G). Resultant Computer Decision Extraction LOWER ARCH: EXTRACTION. Work-Up Presented Is EXTRACTION Lower incisor BACKWARD. mm Extracted teeth Buccal Expansion GAIN. mm ================ REASONS FOR UPPER ARCH DECISION =============== R --------+-------- L Lower molar FORWARD. mm. Convexity change. mm reduce ===================== AUXILIARY APPLIANCES =====================. Upper incisor tip movement for. mm backward overbite/overjet ideal to lower Activator: NEUTRAL. First molar movement required. mm forward Palate separation: N/A - No Arch and Frontal data Headgear: HIGH PULL. First molar movement clinical limit. mm backward LIGHT FORCES for ANCHORAGE. Work-Up Presented Is EXTRACTION ======================== POST TREATMENT ======================== =========================== COMMENTS =========================== Pentamorphic arch form: Normal Arch length relapse:. mm Lower third molar probabilities (based on space available) Impaction: % Marginal: % Functional: % Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

EXTRACTION M. SEQUENCES WORKSHEET // PHASE I TREATMENT EXTRACTION RMO U P P E R A R C H ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION MONTHS NOTES PROGRESS POST TX CORRECT CONVEXITY INTRUDE RETRACT INCISORS L O W E R A R C H ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION MONTHS NOTES PROGRESS POST TX EXTRUDE O C RMO

EXTRACTION M. SEQUENCES WORKSHEET // PHASE II TREATMENT EXTRACTION RMO U P P E R A R C H ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION MONTHS NOTES PROGRESS PROGRESS POST TX EXTRACT RETRACT ADVANCE CLOSE SPACE -- ALIGN/LEVEL BUCCAL SEGS IDEAL ARCH FINAL ARCH L O W E R A R C H ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION MONTHS NOTES EXTRACT RETRACT AND/OR PROGRESS RETRACT RETRACT INCISORS PROGRESS ADVANCE POST TX ALIGN/LEVEL BUCCAL SEGS CLOSE SPACE -- IDEAL ARCH FINAL ARCH O C RMO

EXTRACTION M. // EXTRACT R EXTRACTION TREATMENT DESIGN L PT. A MOVEMENT MAXILLARY CHANGE BACKWARD. MM CHANGE IN MAXILLARY TEETH RMO UPPER MOLAR CHANGE CHANGE IN MANDIBULAR TEETH LOWER INCISOR LOWER MOLAR BWD(RT). FWD. MM MM WORKUP PRESENTED Upper arch: EXTRACTION Lower arch: EXTRACTION MISSING PERMANENT TEETH MANDIBULAR GROWTH R L R --------+-------- L COMMENTS ORIGINAL GROWTH W/O TREATMENT TREATMENT OBJECTIVE O C RMO

RMO Diagnostic Services RMO, Inc. ()- Post Office Box ()- Canoga Park, CA - EXTRACTION RMO Case Number: X-Ray date: // Age:. Reference: S A Dr. Training RMO Run date: // Birthdate: // Sex: Male S T E I N E R A N A L Y S I S ======================= BEFORE TREATMENT ======================= Factor Measured Clinical Clinical Value Norm Deviations From Norm SNA. dg. dg -. * SNB. dg. dg -. ** ANB. dg. dg. SND. dg. dg -. ** A to NA. mm. mm. A to NA. dg. dg. B to NB. mm. mm. * B to NB. dg. dg. A to B. dg. dg -. * OCC.PL/SN. dg. dg. *** Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

O C RMO EXTRACTION M. // STEINER ANALYSIS RMO. mm. mm. mm. mm -. mm AP TO : WITS :. MM -. MM