Response to Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) 2009

Similar documents
Overview of Influenza Surveillance in Korea

Alberta Health. Seasonal Influenza in Alberta Season Summary

Alberta Health. Seasonal Influenza in Alberta Season. Analytics and Performance Reporting Branch

Alberta Health. Seasonal Influenza in Alberta. 2016/2017 Season. Analytics and Performance Reporting Branch

8. Public Health Measures

20. The purpose of this document is to examine the pre-pandemic efforts and the response to the new influenza A (H1N1) virus since April 2009.

INFLUENZA IN MANITOBA 2010/2011 SEASON. Cases reported up to January 29, 2011

INFLUENZA IN MANITOBA 2010/2011 SEASON. Cases reported up to October 9, 2010

ISPUB.COM. Bird flu: A Throbbing Stone In An Infectious Era. T Wadhwa, P Kumar Thirupathi EPIDEMIOLOGY TRANSMISSION FROM AVIAN TO HUMAN

Seasonal Influenza Report

GOVERNMENT OF ALBERTA. Alberta s Plan for Pandemic Influenza

Running head: INFLUENZA VIRUS SEASON PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE 1


Seasonal Influenza Report

Nova Scotia s Response to H1N1. Summary Report

Influenza A(H1N1)2009 pandemic Chronology of the events in Belgium

Influenza. Paul K. S. Chan Department of Microbiology The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Alberta Health. Seasonal Influenza in Alberta. 2012/2013 Season. Surveillance and Assessment Branch. November Government of Alberta 1

Situation update pandemic (H1N1) 2009

Seasonal Influenza Report

2009 H1N1 (Pandemic) virus IPMA September 30, 2009 Anthony A Marfin

INFLUENZA FACTS AND RESOURCES

Human Cases of Influenza A (H1N1) of Swine Origin in the United States and Abroad Updated Key Points April 29, 2008: 9:58AM

Current Swine Influenza Situation Updated frequently on CDC website 109 cases in US with 1 death 57 confirmed cases aroun

Manitoba Influenza Surveillance Report

British Columbia s Pandemic Influenza Response Plan (2012) Logistics of Antiviral Distribution

Human infection with pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus: updated interim WHO guidance on global surveillance

Influenza Update N 157

2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic Defense Health Board Briefing

Review of Influenza Activity in San Diego County

* Rates were not calculated due to small numbers.

The Impact of Pandemic Influenza on Public Health

AUSTRALIAN INFLUENZA SURVEILLANCE SUMMARY REPORT

Next report date: May 27 (May 8 21)

Community and Hospital Surveillance

Avian Influenza Prevention and Preparedness: Global and Regional Strategies and Actions

H1N1 Planning, Response and Lessons to Date

Mika Shimizu, Ph.D. Visiting Scholar, East West Center & Abe Fellow

Improving the Response to Public Health Emergencies

Seasonal Influenza Report

WORLD BANK RESPONSE TO INFLUENZA A(H1N1) Rakesh Nangia Director, Strategy & Operations Human Development Network

A/H1N influenza in Israel: Preparedness and response

Situation Update Pandemic (H1N1) August 2009

The Influenza Season Stephen L. Cochi, M.D., M.P.H. Acting Director National Immunization Program, CDC

Emerging Infections: Pandemic Influenza. W. Paul Glezen

Public Health Management and Preparedness in Wildlife Zoonotic Disease Outbreak

Measures to control Avian Influenza and Pandemic Preparedness in Vietnam

H1N1: Pediatric Surge Capacity Strategies and Lessons Learned

Section 4. Securement of medical system and medicine etc. 1. Securement of medical system

DRAFT WGE WGE WGE WGE WGE WGE WGE WGE WGE WGE WGE WGE WGE WGE GETREADYNOWGE GETREADYNOWGE GETREADYNOWGE GETREADYNOWGE.

Manitoba Influenza Surveillance Report 2012/2013 Season

Manitoba Influenza Surveillance Report

Ralph KY Lee Honorary Secretary HKIOEH

STARK COUNTY INFLUENZA SNAPSHOT, WEEK 15 Week ending 18 April, With updates through 04/26/2009.

November 9 to 15, 2014 (week 46)

H1N1 Response and Vaccination Campaign

Promoting Public Health Security Addressing Avian Influenza A Viruses and Other Emerging Diseases

Seasonal Influenza Report

Planning for Pandemic Influenza in York County: Considerations for Healthcare and Medical Response

Swine Influenza 2009

Influenza Activity Levels Decline while Detections of Swine-Origin Influenza A/H1N1 Continue in BC

What do epidemiologists expect with containment, mitigation, business-as-usual strategies for swine-origin human influenza A?

Seasonal influenza in Wales /15

Pandemic H1N1 2009: The Public Health Perspective. Massachusetts Department of Public Health November, 2009

Influenza A (H1N1) surveillance overview Palau May September 2009

Situation Manual. 355 Minutes. Time Allotted. Situation Manual Tabletop Exercise 1 Disaster Resistant Communities Group

Regional Update Influenza (August 16, h GMT; 12 h EST)

Stable, Above Historical Average Influenza Activity due to Novel Pandemic H1N1 in BC

What Antivirals Can Be Used for 2009 H1N1 Influenza?

Guideline for the Surveillance of Pandemic Influenza (From Phase 4 Onwards)

Influenza Update. Kelly L. Moore, MD, MPH Medical Director, Immunization Program TN Department of Health TPHA Epi Section September 3, 2009

Influenza : What is going on? How can Community Health Centers help their patients?

Week 43 (Oct , 2016)

Seasonal Influenza. Provider Information Sheet. Infectious Disease Epidemiology Program

An outbreak of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in Kolkata, West Bengal, India, 2010

Ongoing Circulation of Swine-Origin Influenza A/H1N1 in BC

Influenza 2009: Not Yet The Perfect Storm

Influenza H1N1. Models of Hospital Preparedness and Response

PANDEMIC INFLUENZA IN THE WORKPLACE

ORIGINAL ARTICLE INFLUENZA A (H1N1) PANDEMIC: PAHANG EXPERIENCE ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

University of Colorado Denver. Pandemic Preparedness and Response Plan. April 30, 2009

Pandemic Influenza: Global and Philippine Situation

The pages that follow contain information critical to protecting the health of your patients and the citizens of Colorado.

December 3 to 9, 2017 (Week 49)

Incidence of Seasonal Influenza

Age-specific incidence/fatality of novel influenza during the 2009 epidemic in Japan

The National Board of Health and Welfare

Epidemiological Situation on Pandemic Influenza H1N in the World and in Japan

Low Influenza Activity

County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services Public Health

Thailand s avian influenza control and pandemic influenza preparedness. Supamit Chunsuttiwat Ministry of Public Health 12 July 2006

INFLUENZA WATCH Los Angeles County

Ontario Influenza Bulletin I SURVEILLANCE WEEK 43 (October 23, 2011 October 29, 2011)

November 5 to 11, 2017 (Week 45)

Summary: Increasing Activity

WHO Response to Influenza A (H1N1) CAPSCA December, 2011 Dr. Nasr Eltantawy Medical epidemiologist WHO/Egypt

SAFETY BULLETIN #3-05 November 11, 2005 Key Facts About Avian Influenza

Manitoba Health, Healthy Living and Seniors (MHHLS) Week 9 (Feb.28 Mar.5, 2016) == Severe outcomes associated with. == Cases and cumulative incidence

The Korean Influenza National Immunization Program: History and Present Status

Transcription:

Response to Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Dukhyoung Lee, PhD Director of the Disease Prevention Center Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Ministry of Health and Welfare The World Health Organization (WHO) announced the emergence of new influenza-like illness on April 24, 2009 (WHO, 2009a). On April 27, the WHO changed pandemic phase 3 to pandemic phase 4; two days later the alert level was raised to phase 5. The WHO declared pandemic (phase 6) on June 11 (WHO, 2009b). From April 2009 to August 1, 2010, more than 214 countries and territories worldwide reported laboratory-confirmed cases including 18,449 fatal cases to the WHO (WHO, 2010). In Korea, more than 3/4 million laboratoryconfirmed cases, 270 of them died with influenza, were reported by the end of August 2010 (KCDC, 2010a). In the Republic of Korea, national disaster phase alerts are categorized into four levels; concern, caution, alert and severe. On April 28, when the first probable patient was identified, the Korea Health Ministry elevated the national disaster phase alert from concern to caution (Figure 1; Lee et al, 2010a). The phase was elevated to alert on July 21 when community outbreaks were detected, and to severe, on November 3 when there was a sharp increase in the number of reported patients. During the early phase of the pandemic, the main strategy was containment through quarantine and patient isolation. Surveillance systems in schools and medical facilities were put into action, and all confirmed cases were investigated. However, when the community outbreaks were detected in June, the policy switched from containment to mitigation. National stockpile of antiviral agents were released extensively for the mitigation. Existing influenza sentinel surveillance system monitored the size of the epidemic. Investigations were carried out for each fatal case and any case suspected of antiviral resistance. A local pharmaceutical company produced both adjuvant and non-adjuvant influenza vaccines. Vaccination was conducted based on availability and feasibility as following schedule for medical personnel from Oct 27, 2009; for school children and students from November 11 (KCDC, 2010b); for preschool children from December 7; for pregnant women from December 21; and for patients with chronic disease from January 18, 2010; for healthy elderly from January 25. Almost 13 million people or 15 million doses were vaccinated. National stockpile of antiviral agents were supplied free of charge throughout the pandemic. Before August 20, antiviral agents were prescribed through community health centers to patients with acute febrile respiratory illness (AFRI) who had a history of travel abroad or a history of contact with a confirmed patient. However, after August 20, when the number of community-acquired cases increased, antiviral agents were prescribed to any patients with AFRI symptoms. From August 20 to October 28, 2009, patients received antiviral agents at 455 designated hospitals and at 1,574 designated pharmacies on physician s prescription. Starting on October 28, when there was sharp increase in the overall number of patients, antiviral agents were provided at the designated hospitals and the designated pharmacy was expanded to all 20,109 pharmacies throughout the country. Physicians were allowed to prescribe antiviral agents to AFRI patients without confirmation

Influenza Like Illness diagnosis. All pharmacies and designated hospitals reported their daily use of antiviral agents to the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) through an internetbased antiviral agent management program. 50 40 Vaccination for Medical Personnel (10/27) Provide Antiviral Agent at all Pharmacies (10/28) 2008-2009 2009-2010 Vaccination for Students (11/11) 30 20 10 Operate the Designated Hospital Containment (8/21) (Quarantine, Isolation) (4/28) Mitigation (Treatment) (7/29) Expand the Candidate for Antiviral Agent Administration (9/1) Vaccination for Patients with Chronic Disease (1/18) Vaccination for Healthy Adults (1/25) 0 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 Month National Disaster Phase Alert Caution (4/28-7/20) Alert (7/21-11/2) Severe (11/3-12/10) Alert (12/11-3/7) Caution (3/8-3/31) WHO Pandemic 4 Phase Phase 5 (4/29-6/10) Phase 6 (11/3-12/10) Main Strategy Containment (Quarantine, Isolation) Mitigation (Treatment) Mitigation (Vaccination) Figure 1. Main Strategy for the Response to Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) 2009 in Korea

The exact number of H1N1 patients was estimated like this. The daily number of incident patients could be estimated from the daily amount of prescribed antiviral agents, the proportion of antiviral agent prescription and the proportion of confirmed H1N1 among patients with AFRI, and by retrospective adjustment of average time lag between onset of symptom and antiviral agent prescription Approximately 3 million patients (6.2% of total population in Korea) were prescribed with antiviral agents. The antiviral agent prescription rate was higher in preschool children (3-6 years old) and schoolchildren and adolescents (7-19 years) than in other age groups (Table 1). Oseltamivir was prescribed to around 3 million (96.9%) patients and zanamivir to around 10 thousand patients. The prescription rate was the highest in the national capital region and in the Southeast (Figure 2). Additionally, the rate was higher in urban areas than in rural areas. And the regional differences were consistent across all age groups (Figure 3). Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Cases Variable Category Total Population Korea in Antiviral Agent Prescription Case Antiviral Agent Prescription Rate (%) Age <3 1,381,293 154,497 11.19 3-6 1,848,284 435,582 23.57 7-19 8,505,042 1,322,626 15.55 20-49 24,129,290 896,404 3.72 50-64 8,641,528 182,714 2.11 65 5,267,708 95,965 1.82 Sex male 24,929,939 1,542,255 6.19 female 24,843,206 1,545,533 6.22 Total 49,773,145 3,087,788 6.20

Figure 2. Antiviral Agent Prescription Rate by Region

8/21 8/28 9/4 9/11 9/18 9/25 10/2 10/9 10/16 10/23 10/30 11/6 11/13 11/20 11/27 12/4 12/11 12/18 12/25 1/1 1/8 1/15 1/22 1/29 2/5 2/12 2/19 2/26 3/5 3/12 3/19 3/26 4/2 4/9 4/16 4/23 Cases Figure 3. Antiviral Agent Prescription Rate by Region and Age Group The amount of antiviral agents prescribed rose sharply from mid-october, peaking on October 30 and decreased starting in mid-november (Figure 4). The gradient of the curve was sharper during the increasing period than in decreasing period. On October 30, 132,459 patients were prescribed with antiviral agents; however, the number of incident patients peaked on October 28 when slightly more incident cases (133,264) were assumed to have occurred. 140,000 Antiviral Agent Prescription 120,000 Adjusted Incident Patients* 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Date Figure 4. Daily Antiviral Agent Prescription and Incident Patients from Aug 21, 2009 to Apr 24, 2010 After pandemic was over, KCDC is trying to solve several serious problems that were identified during the response in 2009. In order to expand the national isolation units or wards, 5 hospitals were designated additionally. Furthermore KCDC supported 76 hospitals to establish isolation out-patient department (OPD) and 34 hospitals to expand isolation intensive care units (ICU). Additionally, isolation rooms have been constructed and laboratories have been upgraded in three national quarantine stations. Bio-safety level (BSL) 3 laboratories have been established in 16 Provincial Research Institutes of Public Health and Environment. KCDC is also planning to build the BSL 4 laboratory complex on its campus. In addition internet based medical resource management system is being developed to increase the effectiveness of national isolation bed utilization and antiviral agent management. Throughout the response we experienced challenges, missed opportunities, limited preparedness turned full preparedness, and mostly luck based advantage. I will share them in my presentation. Reference Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC). Analysis of reported pandemic influezna(a/h1n1 2009) virus infections in Korea -From April, 2009 through August, 2010-. Public Health Weekly Report 2010a;3:637-42 (Korean) Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC). 2009-2010 Influenza A(H1N1) vaccination program in Korea. Public Health Weekly Report 2010b;3:357-60 (Korean)

Lee DH, Shin SS, Jun BY, Lee JK. National level response to pandemic (H1N1) 2009. J Prev Med Public Health 2010a;43:99-104 (Korean) World Health Organization (WHO). Influenza-like illness in the United States and Mexico [Internet]. 2009a Apr 24. Available from: URL:http://www.who.int/csr /don/2009_04_24 /en/index.html World Health Organization (WHO). World now at the start of 2009 influenza pandemic [Internet]. 2009b Jun 11. Available from: URL:http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news /statements/2009/h1n1_pandemic_phase6_20090611/en/index.html World Health Organization (WHO). Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 - update 112. 2010 Aug 6. Available from: URL:http://www.who.int/csr/don/2010_08_06/en/index.html