The Role of Technology in Food Safety

Similar documents
The Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure on Meats

Introduction. Future U.S. initiatives regarding the food safety for fresh produce. FoodNet Partners. FoodNet Partners

Opti.Form DOES MORE. THERE IS MORE TO THE STORY THAN TOP SHELF LISTERIA CONTROL. Corbion.com/opti.form

Listeria monocytogenes in Food Plants with emphasis on Cold-Smoked Salmon Plants & Dairies. Presented by Rebecca Robertson January 19, 2009

OVERVIEW OF FOOD SAFETY REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES. Presented By William C. Balek International Sanitary Supply Association March 30, 2001

October 2018 Important Update: MUST READ

VIOLATIONS AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS

Kathiravan Krishnamurthy Assistant Professor Institute for Food Safety and Health 2015 Clean Label Conference March 31 to April 1

Avure High Pressure Processing

Food Contamination and Spoilage Food Safety: Managing with the HACCP System Second Edition (245TXT or 245CIN)

Inspection Report Item 29: Compliance with Variance, Specialized Process, Reduced Oxygen Packaging Criteria, and HACCP Plan

Listeria monocytogenes Risk Assessment: Executive Summary

The Role of USDA s Food Safety and Inspection Service to Ensure Foodborne Disease Control and Prevention

7th Edition FDA Food Code updates. SERVSAFE Manager. Includes. 7th Edition ES S. Wacker Drive, Suite 3600 Chicago, IL

Market trends in high pressure processing (HPP) food

Food Purchasing & Receiving Review

Food Safety in Older Adults: Disease Prevention Strategies and Educational Resources. Adam Ghering Public Affairs Specialist USDA - FSIS

Nutrition & CSFP: Older Adults. Sheldon Gordon, MS, RD, LD Nutritionist CSFP New Staff State Training January 2010

E-Beam Processing. Irradiation in The United States of Fresh Produce and Perishables Sadex Corporation September 2, 2009

FDA Foodborne Illness Risk Factor Study Data Collection Form

Industry Uses of Microbiological Criteria and Testing for Raw Food Products. R. B. Tompkin Food Safety Consultant

Safety & Sanitation. In your Kitchen. Presented by: Alex Shortsleeve, MBA

Food Safety: Basic Overview of Safely Handling Food

Food Safety Performance Standards: an Epidemiologic Perspective

Why all the Attention to Food Safety?

GCSE Food Technology (AQA) Food safety and hygiene

APPENDIX A - Potentially Hazardous Foods

Overview of USDA Inspection

An Introduction to Food Safety

Human and Pet Food Safety The Natural Way. This information is presented by: Morasch Meats Inc /PressureSafe LLC Wood Village, Oregon (MMI/PSI) 1

Product Development and Food Safety

Microbial Problems, Causes, and Solutions in Meat and Poultry Processing Operations. Helen G. Brown, PhD Research Specialist Tyson Foods, Inc

...what you need to know

Curing as a Single Special Process Regulatory Agency Jurisdiction NAME (fill in form)

The Public Health Rationale Behind FDA s Model Food Code and Its Application to the Classroom

Food Safety Produce Rules How Preventive Controls work From Farm to Fork

HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM

Use of Microbiological Testing and Microbiological Criteria in Regulatory Programs for Meat, Poultry, and Processed Egg Products

Food Safety and Inspection Service ~~ Update ~~

Expert Elicitation on the Relative Risks of Processed Meat and Poultry Products

American Fats and Oils Association Animal Protein Forum, October 9, 2013

E. Coli (Escherichia Coli)

Assess Ingredient Risk. How to. Supplier Approval Program

FDA/CFSAN: Food Irradiation

By reading food labels and handling foods safely, you can avoid many foodrelated health problems.

Food Safety Issues Among Small and Very Small Processors

Foodborne diseases: an ongoing global challenge

Consumer Perceptions of Food Safety: An emphasis on Meat

The Basics of Food Safety in 50 Minutes. Chef Adam Weiner, CFSE JobTrain

State of the Plate. Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health

USDA s New Shiga Toxin- Producing Escherichia coli Policy. James Hodges Executive Vice President American Meat Institute

What Surveys Say about Food Handling in the Home and at Retail

Opportunities to Collect Data and Improve Lm Risk Assessments

Top 8 Pathogens. Print this document and study these pathogens. You will be better prepared to challenge the ADVANCED.fst exam.

Nancy Sittler Region Of Waterloo Public Health

Food Borne Illness. Sources, Symptoms, and Prevention

2009 FDA Food Code Supplement for the ServSafe Fifth Edition

The Food Handler Manual States That Foodborne Illness Can Be Caused By Food Containing

Food Safety for Restaurants: How to Prevent Foodborne Illness, Food Contamination & Lawsuits

Regulatory Update Jennifer McEntire. PMA & United Fresh Joint Listeria Workshop

Food Microbiology 101

Food Safety 101. Devin Brennan Environmental Health Specialist Updated: 6/16/2016. Rachel Buckman, Health Educator August 1, 2013

Controlling Clostridium botulinum. Using challenge testing to create safe chilled foods. Dr Peter Wareing. A Leatherhead Food Research white paper

Risk Assessment Toolbox. Risk Analysis Training

FPP.01: Examine components of the food industry and historical development of food products and processing.

Prepared by Wake County Environmental Services, Environmental Health & Safety Division

2012 Emerging Trends and Key Issues Report Product Recall & Contamination Risk Management CONTENTS

Canadian Regulations and Guidelines for Listeria. Terry Peters Microbiology Program Specialist Canadian Food Inspection Agency

From Farm to Fork: Practical Applications for Food Composition Data. Catherine E. Woteki, Ph.D., R.D. Dean of Agriculture Iowa State University

Food Safety & Hygiene

Glencoe Health. Lesson 4 Nutrition Labels and Food Safety

Appendix C. Meet the Culprits. 1.1 Bacteria 1.2 Viruses 1.3 Parasites 1.4 Yeasts, Moulds, and Other Fungi

Food Commissaries under FSMA and the US FDA model Food Code

Fight BAC Food Safety Trivia Game

Pasteurization & Cook-Chill Processing Methods

Catering Safety 101. Thursday 3:15 pm 4:45 pm. PRESENTED BY: Jean Dible GA Food Safety Professionals Paul Schweitzer Air Culinaire

COURSE BOOK FOOD SAFETY ON THE GO MODULE 4: FOOD SERVICE WORKERS (STAFF AND VOLUNTEERS) 2012 EDITION

Personal Safety, Food Safety and Sanitation. Chapter 18-2

Learning Resource HACCP & Food Safety Management - Hazard and Analysis Critical Control Point

CFI s Safe Food Practices

Date Marking User Guide Standard Date Marking of Packaged Food September 2010

Write the missing words and find them in the letter soup. 1. Microorganisms are _with the naked eye.

Guidance for Reduced Oxygen Packaging

Victoria Salin, Senarath Darmasena, Alex Wong, and Ping Luo Texas A&M University Contact:

VENDOR BOOT CAMP 2016

Food Consumption Data in Microbiological Risk Assessment

SITXFSA001A Implement food safety procedures WEB Assessment

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2013 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection

Practice Test. Practice Tests and Answer Keys

Food Safety Training

Sample Certification Exam - ANSWER KEY

Food Grade Information

Meeting Consumers Expectations

Animal Industry Report

6 Consumer Control Points for Food Safety 1. Purchasing 2. Storing 3. Preparing 4. Cooking

Managing Risk in a Zero Tolerance World: International Impact of Risk Assessment

FOODBORNE DISEASES. Why learning foodborne diseases is very important? What do you know about foodborne diseases? What do you want to know more?

Use a metal stem thermometer to check temperatures while cooking food to make sure that it gets done all the way inside.

Preventing foodborne illnesses. aka FOOD POISONING

Food Borne Illnesses. Foods & Nutrition Sci

Transcription:

The Role of Technology in Food Safety High-Pressure Processing, Food Safety, Increased Shelf Life and Nutritional Value: The Benefits of a New Technology in a Changing World by Errol V. Raghubeer, Ph.D. Vice President, Microbiology & Food Technology Avure Technologies Inc.

While American consumers today have access to food that is without question the safest in the world, recent food scares from lettuce, spinach and pet food poisonings along with massive beef recalls have reduced consumer confidence in food safety to an all-time low. According to a 2010 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 48 million people in the U.S. alone get sick from eating tainted food each year, and the number of such illnesses, particularly from Salmonella, has remained stagnant over at least the past 5 years. 1 Food-borne pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella, and E. coli O157:H7 continue to pose a significant threat to public health at great cost to our nation s food producers and consumers. The cost of managing food-borne disease outbreaks may be as high as $23 billion yearly, according to data from the centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2 Consider the impact of the following food contamination outbreaks: In 1998, a nationwide outbreak linked to hot dogs contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes killed 21 people, and sickened another 100. 3 In 1999, unpasteurized orange juice contaminated with Salmonella resulted in 423 illnesses 4 ; a few years earlier, apple juice contaminated with E. coli O157:H7 resulted in the death of a child. Between 1990 and 2000, oysters and clams caused 2,136 illnesses nationwide due to a variety of pathogens, primarily Norwalk virus and the Vibrio bacteria. 5 In 2011, a Salmonella outbreak linked to ground turkey began in May resulting in 136 illnesses across 34 states with 1 death, and ultimately a recall of over 36 million pounds of ground turkey products. 6 In addition to encouraging the implementation of an active intervention method as a step within HACCP plans, industry and government should join forces to educate consumers about food safety while respecting the right of the consumer to make decisions about products they purchase and the technologies used to make these products safe. How can consumers be better protected from food-borne pathogens? How can food producers significantly improve food safety and deliver the highest quality products? Although no single approach will address all of the nation s food safety and security challenges, the technology exists today to make foods safer. The most time-honored approach to killing bacteria involves the use of high temperatures, or so-called thermal processes. While heat pasteurization and cooking are very effective in destroying bacteria, the use of high temperatures can also destroy some of the important characteristics of food including flavor, texture, color, and nutrition. Other methods of controlling food-borne pathogens involve the use of chemical additives and preservatives. These, however, may have undesirable effects on the quality of food. 1 CDC, 2010 2 HACCP: A View to the Bottom Line, unpublished paper by Larry Keener, April 2002 3 CDC 4 CDC 5 Center of Science in the Public Interest, August 2000 6 CDC 1

HPP: a safe and effective technology to combat food-borne pathogens Another approach to food quality, safety, and security, which scientists have recognized and studied for the past hundred years, has been commercialized as an effective means to destroy food-borne pathogens such as E. coli 0157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella. This technology, known as high-pressure processing, or HPP, uses physical pressure rather than heat, chemicals, or irradiation to make foods safer while conserving the desirable characteristics of the food. Because it does not involve the use of high temperatures, HPP is frequently described as a non-thermal method. Over the past 20 years, using advanced engineering methods, domestic and global companies have refined and commercialized high-pressure processing. Today, HPP has clearly demonstrated its ability to destroy harmful food-borne pathogens and extend the quality of a wide range of foods. HPP equipment is now manufactured in the United States and Europe. As a result, food manufacturers are increasingly turning to HPP to make food safer as well as to extend quality and shelf life and create all-natural, preservative-free products. In fact today the retail market for HPP foods is estimated to be approaching $2 billion annually. 7 HPP works by subjecting food to extremely high hydrostatic pressure up to 87,000 pounds per square inch (psi). While HPP does have its limitations for example, products high in air content such as bread cannot be processed with HPP it has significant advantages and works most effectively on foods that are high in liquid content. Ready-to-eat meats (cold cuts), fresh juice, prepared fruits and vegetables, deli salads, smoked fish, picked crabmeat and oysters are a few examples of products that can benefit from HPP. Covalent bonds are not broken during HPP, and as a result, no free radicals or chemical by-products are formed. Although no direct evidence exists to show that the free radicals produced by irradiation or high temperature cooking are dangerous, free radicals remain a public concern. In addition, HPP does not add anything to food. As a result, neither the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), nor the U.S. Departure of Agriculture s Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) require approval of high-pressure processing. What makes HPP effective at improving the safety of certain foods? HPP works because uniform high pressure affects microbial cellular integrity and metabolism without affecting the covalent structures of food components responsible for nutrition and flavor. The effectiveness of HPP doesn t depend on the size or thickness of the food item its impact is instantaneous and uniform throughout the product, whether it s a one-pound package of sliced chicken meat or a six-pound prosciutto ham. As a food safety technology, HPP offers food manufacturers another means of meeting the FDA s food safety requirements, while still maintaining the highest quality food product possible. For example, when used as an active intervention step within a HACCP plan, HPP can achieve greater than the 5-log reduction of food-borne pathogens as required by the FDA s new Juice HACCP Rule 8 without heat pasteurization of the juice. 7 Avure Technologies estimate 8 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 120; Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HAACP); Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Juice; Food and Drug Administration, HHS 2

HPP can also be used as an active post-harvest intervention step to increase the safety of raw shellfish from potential Vibrio bacteria contamination. As new applications and benefits of HPP are developed, the food industry as well as the FDA and USDA are actively investigating the potential benefits for broad commercial use. Avure Technologies Incorporated, the global leader in high pressure technology has taken the HPP concept and commercialized it. Today Avure manufactures a wide range of HPP systems for laboratory, pre-production and full production use, along with specialized systems available for the seafood industry. The company, through its dedicated food laboratory, assists customers with HPP recipe and packaging development as well as regulatory approval. It has also secured a number of HPP process patents. As of April 2008, Avure had supplied over 50% of the world s HPP commercial capacity, more than all other vendors combined. 9 Consumer acceptance of HPP technology Proprietary research shows that high-pressure processing ranks higher in consumer acceptance than most other food safety methods, including irradiation. According to several research studies, consumers feel most comfortable with a process that does not add anything to the food they are eating. 10 Consumer acceptance was further tested in June 2000, when the Seattle-based research firm, TRD Frameworks, conducted research designed to measure consumer reactions to high-pressure processing. TRD Frameworks conducted phone interviews with 500 randomly selected primary shoppers across the United States. Based on these interviews, overall reaction to high-pressure processing was very positive, with more than 70 percent of consumers rating the technology between 6-7 on a 1-7 scale. The most important benefit of the technology, consumers reported, is its ability to keep food safe while maintaining original product quality. Subsequent research, conducted in 2001 by GMA Research Corporation of Bellevue, Washington, indicates that food executives responsible for quality assurance and food safety feel that negative consumer perceptions of irradiation constitute a barrier to acceptance of irradiation and open the door to a more consumer-friendly technology. 11 Nationally recognized companies including Vegessentials (fresh juices), Maple Lodge Farms (poultry), Ifantis (deli meats), Garden Fresh (salsa), JuicyLine (fresh juices), Perdue Farms (poultry), Fresherized Foods (guacamole, salsa), Calavo (avocado products), Leahy Orchards (applesauce), Winsoms of Walla Walla (chopped onions), Motivatit Seafoods, Nisbet Oyster Company, Joey Oysters (oysters), and others have installed Avure HPP equipment in their manufacturing plants to produce safe, high-quality foods. HPP products are also being produced internationally in Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and Korea. 9 Avure Technologies internal research 10 Irradiation Conference Report 11 Food Safety Technology Study, conducted by GMA Research Corporation, Bellevue, WA, 2001 3

HPP has been demonstrated to be successful with the following product categories: Ready-to-eat meats and poultry: HPP is effective in destroying Listeria in ready-to-eat meats such as sandwich meat, sausage, and other packaged deli cold cuts. HPP reduces Listeria in these products without subjecting the products to post-packaging reheating or ionizing irradiation. HPP does not promote the formation of the free radicals that lead to the loss of desirable sensory qualities such as moisture or flavor. With HPP the product remains fresher and retains its flavor. Seafood and molluscan shellfish: HPP is effective in killing the dangerous Vibrio bacteria often found in raw shellfish without destroying texture and taste. HPP offers the added benefit of separating the shellfish or crustacean meat from the shell. This is a significant economic benefit to shellfish processors. HPP also kills Listeria and extends the refrigerated shelf life of smoked fish, picked crabmeat and other seafood products. Fruit and vegetable products: HPP can kill potential food-borne pathogens and extend refrigerated shelf life in fresh salsa, dressing, guacamole, and other value-added fruit and vegetable products. 12 Juice: HPP can produce fresh-tasting, safe juice, while also extending its refrigerated shelf life. Scientific data shows that food pathogens such as Salmonella, L. monocytogenes, and E. coli O157:H7 are effectively destroyed by HPP without changing the juice s fresh, natural characteristics. HPP can achieve a greater than 5-log (100,000 times) reduction of the pathogens of concern in fresh juice, and is recognized as a viable technology for the FDA s 5-log pathogen reduction in fruit juice and cut fruits. Similar approvals have been granted in Europe, Canada, and other countries. Conclusion As a food safety and food security technology, HPP offers these benefits to processors and consumers: Safety HPP provides an effective means of combating food-borne pathogens. Nothing is added to the food during the HPP process. Quality HPP preserves the quality without impacting the sensory characteristics and nutrition of most food. HPP also reduces food waste by extending the refrigerated shelf life of many perishable products 2X or more. High quality ingredients must be used to achieve high quality final products. This significant shelf life extension also enables products to reach new geographic markets Consumer-friendliness Research indicates that consumer acceptance of HPP is very high. HPP does not involve the use of irradiation or chemical preservatives, and it is environmentally friendly. Because HPP can dramatically increase shelf life without the use of preservatives, food processors are able to deliver the all-natural clean label foods that today s consumers desire. 12 Numerous studies have been conducted on HPP bacteria inactivation in foods. For example, Raghubeer, R., Dunne, P., Farkas, D., Ting, E.; Evaluation of Batch and Semicontinuous Application of High Hydrostatic Pressure on Foodborne Pathogens in Salsa, Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 63, No. 12, 2000. 4

As a result HPP is being used extensively by processors for manufacturing of all-natural products in the ready-to-eat meat category and shucking and shelling of seafood. There is also global acceptance of HPP for processing preservative free processed fruit and vegetable products and high growth of fresh juice and smoothie applications. Lastly, there are strong emerging markets for ready-meals, deli salads, guacamole and salsas, condiments, soups, and dressings. To learn more about HPP solutions, please visit www.avure.com/food. Avure Technologies Global Headquarters and Americas Sales 210 Gothic Court Franklin, TN 37067 +1 615.224.2600 Europe and Asia Pacific Sales Quintusvagen 2 SE 721 66 Vasteras Sweden +46 21 327000 Email: info@avure.com 2013 Avure Technologies. All rights reserved. Trademarks listed herein are the properties of their respective owners. 5