ORDINANCE NO REZONE NO. 213

Similar documents
PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE RECITALS

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, on October 9, 2015, Governor Jerry Brown signed the "Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act" ("Act") into law; and

ATTACHMENT. Draft Ordinance No ( Code Amendment )

ORDINANCE NO

Scott Friend, AICP Community Development Director Rick Crabtree, City Manager/Attorney

PC RESOLUTION NO XX

CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL. For the special meeting of: January 19, 2016 Originating Department: Planning

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE

ORDINANCE NO. City Attorney s Synopsis

B. The intent of the CUA was to enable persons in the State of California who

ORDINANCE NO SECTION 1. The Board of Supervisors makes the following findings in support of this ordinance:

EXTENSION OF URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO

Attachment 1 ORDINANCE 562

Zoning) of the Tiburon Municipal Code regarding regulation of marijuana facilities, marijuana cultivation and marijuana deliveries.

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, absent appropriate local regulation authorized by the MAUCRSA, state regulations will control; and

ORDINANCE NO

SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE PROHIBITING CANNABIS DISPENSARIES, CANNABIS MANUFACTURING, CANNABIS CULTIVATION, AND CANNABIS DELIVERY

OC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT

ORDINANCE NO ENACTING SECTION 42 TO ORDINANCE 315, THE TRINITY COUNTY ZONING CODE

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the MCRSA contains statutory provisions that:

STAFF REPORT City of Lancaster NB 2

CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE (Next in Line)

REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

ADOPTING A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING BAN ON CULTIVATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACTIVITIES

City of Lafayette Staff Report

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF. SECTION 1. The Mayor and Council make the following legislative findings:

ORD. NO P 9/2-16(klk) 2

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF LOMITA PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO

STAFF REPORT. Proposed Zoning Amendments Regulating Personal Cultivation of Cannabis

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division STAFF REPORT: #15-23 AGENDA ITEM: 4.2

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO RECITALS:

to legally possess, use, and cultivate marijuana for medical use under state law; and,

A~~~x A PLACE.jOr FAt..ffiJES in tile HEA.RT rif the DELIA

STAFF REPORT. Agenda Item: _A Date of Meeting: March 28, 2017 Department: Planning. City of Bishop Planning Commission

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS: FINDINGS, LEGISLATIVE NOTICE AND PURPOSE

ORDINANCE NO. Sumas Ordinance No. Prohibiting Marijuana Businesses (Draft )

EXHIBIT A: Red-line version of proposed ordinance ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTIONS

ACTION REQUESTED Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion take the following actions:

ORDINANCE NO

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG ) ) ) ) ) )

Ordinance No. 1632(17)

AGENDA REPORT. SAN CLEMENTE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Meeting Date: August 18, 2015

Planning Commission Report

TOWN OF KENNEBUNK MORATORIUM ORDINANCE ON RETAIL MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENTS AND RETAIL MARIJUANA SOCIAL CLUBS

TITLE 22 - ZONING CHAPTER MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES AND CULTIVATION

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY

ORDINANCE NO AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF TEHAMA AMENDING CHAPTER 9.06 OF THE TEHAMA COUNTY CODE

MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013 Urgency Ordinance Imposing Temporary Moratorium on Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

MEMORANDUM. 2) Direct staff to prepare an ordinance banning all marijuana uses and activities to the extent authorized by current state law; and

ORDINANCE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTRALIA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, on October 13, 2017 the Sausalito Legislative Subcommittee held duly

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR STEVEN ANNIBALI, POLICE CHIEF DAVID HIRSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY

ORDINANCE NO The Town Council of the Town of Yucca Valley, California, ( Town ) does ordain as follows:

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

AMENDED IN BOARD 9/12/17 ORDINANCE NO Urgency ordinance approving an interim zoning moratorium on the approval of medical


ORDINANCE NO CHAPTER 10: Medical Marijuana Cannabis Use and Regulation

ORDINANCE NUMBER

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. Yolo County, California

ORDINANCE NO

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO

MEDICAL MARIJUANA IN INYO COUNTY AU G U S T 2 ND,

New Article IX, of Chapter 22, Businesses, of the Sallisaw City Code is hereby established by enacting the following sections, to- wit:

BILL #261 CITY OF FERNLEY ORDINANCE #

WHEREAS, on June 15, 2010, after proper notice and review of a progress report, the City Council deemed that an additional extension of the temporary

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 2270

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO Ordinance No. 00X-2017 Page 1 of 17

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CHAPTER 11G. CANNABIS (MARIJUANA)

offensive odors, trespassing, theft, violent encounters, fire hazards and problems associated with mold, fungus, and pests; and

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 5.45 TO, AND AMENDING SECTION 5.35.

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 2263

AS AMENDED A BILL WHEREAS, WHEREAS WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS WHEREAS, WHEREAS,

M E M O R A N D U M TO:

CONTACT INFORMATION WHY DO WE CARE?

WHEREAS, the Board desires to provide regulations pertaining to the location, land use, appearance, and signage of medical marijuana uses; and

CITY OF BUCKLEY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO 268. WHEREAS, the AUMA s Business & Professions Code Section 26055(e) provides that a

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Recommendation

ORDINANCE NO

Latest Developments in Cannabis Regulation

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum

Glenn Parker, Council Member Marty Simonoff, Council Member Steven Vargas, Council Member

MEDICAL MARIJUANA ORDINANCE

This Chapter shall be known as the Marijuana Use and Regulation Ordinance for the City of Palm Desert.

AMENDMENT 3 TO ORDER /19 FOR COUNCILOR BELINDA RAY RE: CHANGE TO ALLOWABLE SALES AT MARIJUANA RETAIL STORES.

Transcription:

Page 1 of 5 ORDINANCE NO. 1000 REZONE NO. 213 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25.213 OF THE RED BLUFF CITY CODE PROHIBITING USES PROHIBITING MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES, COLLECTIVES, COOPERATIVE AND THE CULTIVATION OF MARIJUANA IN ANY ZONING DISTRICT ALONG WITH AMENDING RED BLUFF CITY CODE SECTION 25.239 DEFINITIONS BY ADDING A DEFINITION FOR MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES, COLLECTIVES, COOPERATIVE AND THE CULTIVATION OF MARIJUANA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RED BLUFF DOES HERBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Red Bluff hereby finds and declares the following: (A) In 1996, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215 (codified as California Health and Safety Code section 11362.5, and entitled The Compassionate Use Act of 1996 ). The intent of Proposition 215 was to enable persons who are in need of marijuana for medical purposes to use it without fear of criminal prosecution under limited, specified circumstances. (B) In 2004, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill 420 (codified as California Health and Safety Code sections 11362.7 et seq.) to clarify the scope of Proposition 215, and to provide qualifying patients and primary caregivers who collectively or cooperatively cultivate marijuana for medical purposes with a limited defense to certain specified State criminal statutes. (C) The federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq., classifies marijuana as a Schedule I Drug, which is defined as a drug or other substance that has a high potential for abuse, that has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and that has not been accepted as safe for use under medical supervision. The Federal Controlled Substances Act makes it unlawful, under federal law, for any person to cultivate, manufacture, distribute or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute or dispense, marijuana. The Federal Controlled Substances Act contains no exemption for the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, dispensation, or possession of marijuana for medical purposes. (D) Facilities which dispense marijuana have the potential to cause serious harmful effects on the neighborhoods in which they are located, to owners of property in such neighborhoods, and to citizens living, visiting, shopping, conducting business or otherwise present in the area, as reported by several other California Counties and Cities. Such effects are due to such factors as the illegal nature of the activity under federal law, the presence of large quantities of marijuana at the dispensaries, the presence of large amounts of cash, the presence of weapons, and other factors. Harmful effects at the dispensaries and the surrounding areas have included an increase in burglaries, robberies, illegal sales of drugs, use or possession

of marijuana by unauthorized persons, attacks on persons entering or leaving the premises, loitering, smoking marijuana in public places, and driving while under the influence of marijuana. These harmful "secondary effects" are further detailed in the White Paper on Marijuana Dispensaries by California Police Chief's Association Task Force on Marijuana Dispensaries dated April 22, 2009. The violent January 2009 home invasion burglary and homicide in Los Molinos, targeting the substantial amounts of marijuana possessed by the home's occupant ostensibly for medical purposes, is one recent local example of the secondary effects of concentrating substantial amounts of marijuana in one place. (E) Recently, the U.S. Attorney General stated that federal law enforcement officials would ease enforcement at California medical marijuana facilities. For this reason, among others, there is burgeoning interest in establishing marijuana dispensaries in the State of California, and in the region of the County of Tehama. In response, numerous cities and counties around the state are enacting regulations. Among the cities located within Tehama County, and among other counties adjacent to Tehama County, many agencies have recently enacted ordinances either prohibiting, regulating, or establishing a moratorium on marijuana dispensaries. These regulations can be expected to have the effect of redirecting persons desirous of establishing such dispensaries, to consider doing so in the City of Red Bluff. (F) Proposition 215 and Senate Bill 420 do not preempt local zoning or nuisance regulations affecting marijuana-related land uses; rather, Senate Bill 420 (Health and Safety Code section 11362.83) expressly allows Cities and Counties to adopt and enforce ordinances that are consistent with state law. The scope of local regulatory power continues to be challenged by proponents of marijuana-related land uses. Local regulatory power over marijuana dispensaries was recently upheld by the California Court of Appeal in the case known as City of Claremont v. Darrell, 177 Cal.App.4 th 1153 (2009). (G) Under the current provisions of the Red Bluff City Zoning Code (Title 25 of the Red Bluff City Code), Marijuana Dispensaries are not identified as a permitted use, or a use permitted subject to a use permit, in any zoning district in the City. While the City interprets these provisions to mean that such uses are prohibited, numerous other local governments, including the Cities of Corning, Anderson, Claremont, and Corona, have faced arguments that Marijuana Dispensaries are permitted uses under similar ordinances, or are encompassed within generic permitted uses, such as "miscellaneous retail" or medical clinics. (H) Other local governments in the region, including the Cities of Corning and Anderson, whose ordinances did not clearly address Marijuana Dispensaries, witnessed the rapid establishment of such facilities, whose operators then claimed exemption from later-enacted regulations. (I) The establishment, development, construction, maintenance, or operation of Marijuana Dispensaries, and the continued approval of use permits, variances, building permits, or any other applicable entitlements authorizing their Page 2 of 5

establishment, would result in a threat to the public health, safety and welfare, because such uses threaten to cause the harmful "secondary effects" identified above within the City of Red Bluff. (J) The number of parcels in the City used to grow marijuana has increased substantially. Marijuana plants as they begin to flower and for a period of two months or more during the growing season (August October) produce an extremely strong odor, offensive to many people, and detectable far beyond property boundaries. This odor has interfered with Red Bluff residents use and enjoyment of their property. The strong smell of marijuana as well as its visibility from adjacent parcels or from areas accessible to the general public advertises its presence in the neighborhood and creates both an attractive nuisance and the risk of robbery, theft and violence. The City has received numerous odor complaints related to the growing of marijuana in residential neighborhoods. Several recent events have called attention to the impact on public safety caused by the growing of marijuana in residential neighborhoods of the City. During the past year, the City Police Department reports numerous calls to the department to respond to incidents related to the growing of marijuana in residential neighborhoods. These incidents demonstrate that the cultivation of marijuana within the City limits poses a threat to public safety. The City of Red Bluff is a relatively small city and has limited resources available to engage in extensive regulation of marijuana cultivation. SECTION 2. In order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Red, Section 25.213 is amended to add the following: 25.213 PROHIBITED USES (K) A Medical Marijuana Dispensary or Dispensary as defined in Section 25.239 is prohibited in all zones and districts of the City of Red Bluff and shall be considered a nuisance as defined in Section 15.1 of this Code. (L) A medical Marijuana Collective as defined in Section 25.239 is prohibited in all zones and districts of the City of Red Bluff and shall be considered a nuisance as defined in Section 15.1 of this Code. (M) A medical Marijuana Cooperative as defined in Section 25.239 is prohibited in all zones and districts of the City of Red Bluff and shall be considered a nuisance as defined in Section 15.1 of this Code. (N) The Cultivation of marijuana as defined in Section 25.239 is prohibited in all zones and districts of the City of Red Bluff and shall be considered a nuisance as defined in Section 15.1 of this Code. Page 3 of 5

SECTION 3. In order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Red Bluff, Section 25.239 is amended to add a definition for Medical marijuana dispensary or dispensary to read as follows: MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY OR DISPENSARY. Medical marijuana dispensary or dispensary means any facility or location, whether fixed or mobile, where medical marijuana is made available to or distributed by or distributed to one or more of the following: a "primary caregiver," a "qualified patient," or a "patient with an identification card." All three of these terms are identified in strict accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5 et seq. A medical marijuana dispensary shall not include the following uses, as long as the location of such uses is otherwise regulated by this code or applicable law: a clinic licensed pursuant to Chapter 1 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a healthcare facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a residential care facility for persons with chronic life-threatening illnesses licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.01 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a residential care facility for the elderly licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; or a residential hospice, or a home health agency licensed pursuant to Chapter 8 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, as long as such use complies strictly with applicable law, including, but not limited to, Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5 et seq. (Ord. 1059 2 (part), 2006) SECTION 4. In order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Red Bluff, Section 25.239 is amended to add a definition for Medical marijuana collectives to read as follows: MARIJUANA COLLECTIVES. Marijuana Collectives means any group consisting of two or more patients, and/or their primary caregivers, who choose to associate together in the use or cultivation of medical cannabis/marijuana, or who facilitate the use of cannabis/marijuana for patients and/or their caregivers. SECTION 5. In order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Red Bluff, Section 25.239 is amended to add a definition for medical marijuana cooperative to read as follows: MARIJUANA COOPERATIVE. Marijuana Cooperative means any group consisting of two or more patients, and/or their primary caregivers, who choose to associate together in the use or cultivation of medical cannabis/marijuana, or who facilitate the use of cannabis/marijuana for patients and/or their caregivers. SECTION 6. In order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Red Bluff, Section 25.239 is amended to add a definition for Marijuana cultivation to read as follows: Page 4 of 5

CULTIVATION. Cultivation means the planting, growing, harvesting, drying, or processing of cannabis/marijuana plants or any part thereof, whether indoors or outdoors. SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall be published in a manner provided in Section 36933 of the Government Code in the Red Bluff Daily News, a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Red Bluff and shall be effective 30 days after its passage. SECTION 8. The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Red Bluff City Council on and adopted at a regular adjourned meeting on by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: Wayne Brown, MAYOR ATTEST: Jo Anna Lopez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Richard Crabtree, City Attorney Page 2 of 2 Page 5 of 5

ORDINANCE NO. 1003 REZONE NO. 213 AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25.213 OF THE RED BLUFF CITY CODE PROHIBITING USES PROHIBITING MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES, COLLECTIVES, AND COOPERATIVES IN ANY ZONING DISTRICT ALONG WITH AMENDING RED BLUFF CITY CODE SECTION 25.239 DEFINITIONS BY ADDING A DEFINITION FOR MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES, COLLECTIVES, AND COOPERATIVES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RED BLUFF DOES HERBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. This interim urgency ordinance is adopted pursuant to California Constitution, article XI, section 7 and Government Code section 65858. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Red Bluff, by four-fifths vote, hereby finds and declares the following: (A) In 1996, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215 (codified as California Health and Safety Code section 11362.5, and entitled The Compassionate Use Act of 1996 ). The intent of Proposition 215 was to enable persons who are in need of marijuana for medical purposes to use it without fear of criminal prosecution under limited, specified circumstances. (B) In 2004, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill 420 (codified as California Health and Safety Code sections 11362.7 et seq.) to clarify the scope of Proposition 215, and to provide qualifying patients and primary caregivers who collectively or cooperatively cultivate marijuana for medical purposes with a limited defense to certain specified State criminal statutes. (C) The federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq., classifies marijuana as a Schedule I Drug, which is defined as a drug or other substance that has a high potential for abuse, that has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and that has not been accepted as safe for use under medical supervision. The Federal Controlled Substances Act makes it unlawful, under federal law, for any person to cultivate, manufacture, distribute or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute or dispense, marijuana. The Federal Controlled Substances Act contains no exemption for the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, dispensation, or possession of marijuana for medical purposes. (D) Facilities which dispense marijuana have the potential to cause serious harmful effects on the neighborhoods in which they are located, to owners of Page 1 of 5

property in such neighborhoods, and to citizens living, visiting, shopping, conducting business or otherwise present in the area, as reported by several other California Counties and Cities. Such effects are due to such factors as the illegal nature of the activity under federal law, the presence of large quantities of marijuana at the dispensaries, the presence of large amounts of cash, the presence of weapons, and other factors. Harmful effects at the dispensaries and the surrounding areas have included an increase in burglaries, robberies, illegal sales of drugs, use or possession of marijuana by unauthorized persons, attacks on persons entering or leaving the premises, loitering, smoking marijuana in public places, and driving while under the influence of marijuana. These harmful "secondary effects" are further detailed in the White Paper on Marijuana Dispensaries by California Police Chief's Association Task Force on Marijuana Dispensaries dated April 22, 2009. The violent January 2009 home invasion burglary and homicide in Los Molinos, targeting the substantial amounts of marijuana possessed by the home's occupant ostensibly for medical purposes, is one recent local example of the secondary effects of concentrating substantial amounts of marijuana in one place. (E) Recently, the U.S. Attorney General stated that federal law enforcement officials would ease enforcement at California medical marijuana facilities. For this reason, among others, there is burgeoning interest in establishing marijuana dispensaries in the State of California, and in the region of the County of Tehama. In response, numerous cities and counties around the state are enacting regulations. Among the cities located within Tehama County, and among other counties adjacent to Tehama County, many agencies have recently enacted ordinances either prohibiting, regulating, or establishing a moratorium on marijuana dispensaries. These regulations can be expected to have the effect of redirecting persons desirous of establishing such dispensaries, to consider doing so in the City of Red Bluff. (F) Proposition 215 and Senate Bill 420 do not preempt local zoning or nuisance regulations affecting marijuana-related land uses; rather, Senate Bill 420 (Health and Safety Code section 11362.83) expressly allows Cities and Counties to adopt and enforce ordinances that are consistent with state law. The scope of local regulatory power continues to be challenged by proponents of marijuana-related land uses. Local regulatory power over marijuana dispensaries was recently upheld by the California Court of Appeal in the case known as City of Claremont v. Darrell, 177 Cal.App.4 th 1153 (2009). (G) Under the current provisions of the Red Bluff City Zoning Code (Title 25 of the Red Bluff City Code), Marijuana Dispensaries are not identified as a permitted use, or a use permitted subject to a use permit, in any zoning district in the City. While the City interprets these provisions to mean that such uses are prohibited, numerous other local governments, including the Cities of Corning, Anderson, Claremont, and Corona, have faced arguments that Marijuana Dispensaries are permitted uses under similar ordinances, or are encompassed within generic permitted uses, such as "miscellaneous retail" or medical clinics. Page 2 of 5

(H) Other local governments in the region, including the Cities of Corning and Anderson, whose ordinances did not clearly address Marijuana Dispensaries, witnessed the rapid establishment of such facilities, whose operators then claimed exemption from later-enacted regulations. (I) The City intends to consider and study possible means of regulating or prohibiting Marijuana Dispensaries, including zoning regulations and other regulations, and by this Ordinance shall direct the immediate commencement of such consideration and study. (J) If Marijuana Dispensaries are allowed to be established, developed, constructed, maintained, or operated in the City without appropriate regulation, such uses may be established in areas, or operated in a manner, that would conflict with the proposed regulations to be considered and studied by the City, and would therefore defeat the purpose of the proposal to study and adopt new regulations regarding Marijuana Dispensaries. (K) The establishment, development, construction, maintenance, or operation of Marijuana Dispensaries, and the continued approval of use permits, variances, building permits, or any other applicable entitlements authorizing their establishment, would result in a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare, because such uses threaten to cause the harmful "secondary effects" identified above within the City of Red Bluff, and because such uses may frustrate the accomplishment of the goals of the Marijuana Dispensary regulations that the City will consider and study. It is therefore necessary to adopt this Ordinance to prohibit their establishment, development, construction, maintenance, or operation during the period of such consideration and study. SECTION 3. In order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Red Bluff from a current and immediate threat, Section 25.213 is amended to add the following: 25.213 PROHIBITED USES (K) A Medical Marijuana Dispensary or Dispensary as defined in Section 25.239 is prohibited in all zones and districts of the City of Red Bluff and shall be considered a nuisance as defined in Section 15.1 of this Code. (L) A medical Marijuana Collective as defined in Section 25.239 is prohibited in all zones and districts of the City of Red Bluff and shall be considered a nuisance as defined in Section 15.1 of this Code. (M) A medical Marijuana Cooperative as defined in Section 25.239 is prohibited in all zones and districts of the City of Red Bluff and shall be considered a nuisance as defined in Section 15.1 of this Code. Page 3 of 5

SECTION 4. In order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Red Bluff from a current and immediate threat, Section 25.239 is amended to add a definition for Medical marijuana dispensary or dispensary to read as follows: MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY OR DISPENSARY. Medical marijuana dispensary or dispensary means any facility or location, whether fixed or mobile, where medical marijuana is made available to or distributed by or distributed to one or more of the following: a "primary caregiver," a "qualified patient," or a "patient with an identification card." All three of these terms are identified in strict accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5 et seq. A medical marijuana dispensary shall not include the following uses, as long as the location of such uses is otherwise regulated by this code or applicable law: a clinic licensed pursuant to Chapter 1 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a healthcare facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a residential care facility for persons with chronic life-threatening illnesses licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.01 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a residential care facility for the elderly licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; or a residential hospice, or a home health agency licensed pursuant to Chapter 8 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, as long as such use complies strictly with applicable law, including, but not limited to, Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5 et seq. (Ord. 1059 2 (part), 2006) SECTION 5. In order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Red Bluff from a current and immediate threat, Section 25.239 is amended to add a definition for Medical marijuana collectives to read as follows: MARIJUANA COLLECTIVES. Marijuana Collectives means any group consisting of two or more patients, and/or their primary caregivers, who choose to associate together in the use or cultivation of medical cannabis/marijuana, or who facilitate the use of cannabis/marijuana for patients and/or their caregivers. SECTION 6. In order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Red Bluff from a current and immediate threat, Section 25.239 is amended to add a definition for medical marijuana cooperative to read as follows: MARIJUANA COOPERATIVE. Marijuana Cooperative means any group consisting of two or more patients, and/or their primary caregivers, who choose to associate together in the use or cultivation of medical cannabis/marijuana, or who facilitate the use of cannabis/marijuana for patients and/or their caregivers. SECTION 7. This interim urgency ordinance is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA"), and accordingly is not subject to its provisions. Nevertheless, to the extent that this interim urgency ordinance may be construed as a project, it is exempt from CEQA under the general rule that it can be seen with certainty that prohibiting the establishment or operation of marijuana dispensaries on an interim basis has no possibility of having a Page 4 of 5

significant effect on the environment, as set forth in California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15061, subdivision (b)(3). Further, this interim urgency ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code section 21080, subdivision (b)(4) and California Code of Regulations, title 14, sections 15307 and 15308. SECTION 8. This Ordinance is an urgency ordinance necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety. Pursuant to Government Code section 36937, this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption by four-fifths of the City Council, and prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days from the adoption thereof shall be published at least one time in the Red Bluff Daily News, a newspaper of general circulation. The foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular adjourned meeting of the Red Bluff City Council on by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: Wayne Brown, MAYOR ATTEST: Jo Anna Lopez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Richard Crabtree, City Attorney Page 5 of 5