Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 40, No. 2, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /02/$22.

Similar documents
The ajmaline challenge in Brugada syndrome: Diagnostic impact, safety, and recommended protocol

CME Article Brugada pattern masking anterior myocardial infarction

Electrophysiologic investigation in Brugada syndrome

P. Brugada 1, R. Brugada 2 and J. Brugada 3. Introduction. U.S.A.; 3 Unitat d Arritmias, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain

Are there low risk patients in Brugada syndrome?

Clinical and Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Patients with Brugada Syndrome: Report of Five Cases of Documented Ventricular Fibrillation

The Brugada syndrome is an arrhythmogenic disease

Short QT Syndrome: Pharmacological Treatment

ICD in a young patient with syncope

The Electrophysiologic Mechanism of ST-Segment Elevation in Brugada Syndrome

Basics of Structure/Function of Sodium and Potassium Channels Barry London, MD PhD

Approximately 5% of patients who experience sudden death

Atrial Fibrillation and Brugada Syndrome

J Wave Syndromes. Osama Diab Lecturer of Cardiology Ain Shams University

Exercise guidelines in athletes with isolated repolarisation abnormalities and structurally normal heart.

Name of Presenter: Marwan Refaat, MD

Ripolarizzazione precoce. Torino, 24th October Non così innocente come si pensava

The Brugada Syndrome: An Easily Identified and Preventable Cause of Sudden Cardiac Death

Citation for published version (APA): Meregalli, P. G. (2009). Brugada syndrome : clinical and pathophysiological aspects

Ventricular Arrhythmia Induced by Sodium Channel Blocker in Patients With Brugada Syndrome

Invasive Risk Stratification: When is it needed?

SEMINAIRES IRIS. Sudden cardiac death in the adult. Gian Battista Chierchia. Heart Rhythm Management Center, UZ Brussel. 20% 25% Cancers !

Case Presentation. Asaad Khan University College Hospital Galway Rep of Ireland

J-wave syndromes: update on ventricular fibrillation mechanisms

Pearls of the ESC/ERS Guidelines 2015 Channelopathies

Brugada Syndrome: An Update

Optimal management of Brugada syndrome

Strength and weakness of genetic testing in clinical routine.

Syncope in patients with inherited arrhythmogenic syndromes. Is it enough to justify ICD implantation?

The impact of clinical and genetic findings on the management of young Brugada Syndrome patients

Διαχείρηση Ασυμπτωματικού ασθενούς με ΗΚΓ τύπου Brugada

MICS OF MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA AND INFARCTION REVISED FOR LAS VEGAS

WINDLAND SMITH RICE SUDDEN DEATH GENOMICS LABORATORY

Gender Differences in Clinical Manifestations of Brugada Syndrome

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Heart Rhythm. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2006 June 6.

Brugada Syndrome: Age is just a number

Clinical profile and genetic basis of Brugada syndrome in the Chinese population

In vivo studies of Scn5a+/ mice modeling Brugada syndrome demonstrate both conduction and repolarization abnormalities

A case of Brugada syndrome coexisting with vasospastic angina: Caution should be taken when using calcium channel blockers

Tailored treatment in Brugada syndrome

Dr Wilde, could you please begin by describing the strongest key evidence in support of the depolarisation hypothesis?

/$ -see front matter 2012 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved. doi: /j.hrthm

Brugada syndrome is a cardiac disease caused by an

IN THE NAME OF GOD. Dr.Sima Sayah

Genetics of Sudden Cardiac Death. Geoffrey Pitt Ion Channel Research Unit Duke University. Disclosures: Grant funding from Medtronic.

When the rhythm of life is disturbed

ΤΙ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΓΝΩΡΙΖΕΙ ΟΓΕΝΙΚΟΣ ΚΑΡΔΙΟΛΟΓΟΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΙΣ ΔΙΑΥΛΟΠΑΘΕΙΕΣ

Brugada syndrome is an inherited, autosomal dominant

Low Prevalence of Risk Markers in Cases of Sudden Death Due to Brugada Syndrome

The Role of Defibrillator Therapy in Genetic Arrhythmia Syndromes

Long QT Syndrome in Neonates Conduction Disorders Associated With HERG Mutations and Sinus Bradycardia With KCNQ1 Mutations

Professor Eric Schulze-Bahr

A case of convulsion: Brugada syndrome

INTRODUCTION. left ventricular non-compaction is a sporadic or familial cardiomyopathy characterized by

Solutions for Every Day Problems Cardiologists and the ECG: Are We Really That Good at It? Part II Daniel José Piñeiro Profesor Titular de Medicina,

Case Demonstrations in Congenital and Acquired Long QT Syndrome

FANS Paediatric Pathway for Inherited Arrhythmias*

Prediction of Life-Threatening Arrhythmia in Patients after Myocardial Infarction by Late Potentials, Ejection Fraction and Holter Monitoring

ECG Cases and Questions. Ashish Sadhu, MD, FHRS, FACC Electrophysiology/Cardiology

Asyndrome of sudden death characterized by ST-segment

Phase 2 Early Afterdepolarization as a Trigger of Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Acquired Long-QT Syndrome

Appearance of J wave in the inferolateral leads and ventricular fibrillation provoked by mild hypothermia in a patient with Brugada syndrome

Supraventricular arrhythmias in Brugada syndrome. Prof. Dr. Martin Borggrefe Mannheim

Asaad Khoury 2,3 MD, Monther Boulos 1,3 MD, Mahmoud Suleiman 1,3 MD, Miry Blich 1,3 MD, Michael Eldar 4 MD, Ibrahim Marai 1,3 MD,

Is There a Genomic Basis to Acquired Channelopathic disease

The pill-in-the-pocket strategy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

J Wave Syndrome: Clinical Diagnosis, Risk Stratification And Treatment Kamal K Sethi,Kabir Sethi,Surendra K Chutani

Long QT Syndrome in Children in the Era of Implantable Defibrillators

Risk Stratification for Asymptomatic Patients With Brugada Syndrome

Drugs Controlling Myocyte Excitability and Conduction at the AV node Singh and Vaughan-Williams Classification

Long Q. Long QT Syndrome. A Guide for

ECG interpretation basics

QT Interval: The Proper Measurement Techniques.

CONGENITAL LONG QT SYNDROME(CLQTS) ASSOCIATED WITH COMPLETE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK. A CASE REPORT.

The Early Repolarization ECG Pattern An Update

Augmented ST-Segment Elevation During Recovery From Exercise Predicts Cardiac Events in Patients With Brugada Syndrome

M Furuhashi, K Uno, K Tsuchihashi, D Nagahara, M Hyakukoku, T Ohtomo, S Satoh, T Nishimiya, K Shimamoto

Φαρμακεσηική αγωγή ζηις ιδιοπαθείς κοιλιακές αρρσθμίες. Άννα Κωζηοπούλοσ Επιμελήηρια Α Ωνάζειο Καρδιοτειροσργικό Κένηρο

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 47, No. 1, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /06/$32.

Masqueraders of STEMI

Genetic Testing for Cardiac Ion Channelopathies

Active Cascade Screening in Primary Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes

Case Report. Faculty of Medicine, Oita University 2 Department of Cardiology, Hakuaikai Hospital

Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for the Brugada Syndrome

Approximately 5% of patients who experience sudden

ECG Workshop. Carolyn Shepherd And Anya Horne UWE Principles of Cardiac Care

Congenital long QT syndrome of particularly malignant course connected with so far unknown mutation in the sodium channel SCN5A gene

Acquired QT prolongation and Torsades de Pointes: a review and case report

Genetic testing in Cardiomyopathies

State of the Art: Brugada Syndrome Novel diagnostic approaches and risk stratification

When VF is the endpoint, wait and see is not always the best option.

Ventricular arrhythmia during ajmaline challenge for the Brugada syndrome

Diploma in Electrocardiography

Ripolarizzazione precoce.

Asyndrome characterized by ST-segment elevation in

Left cardiac sympathectomy to manage beta-blocker resistant LQT patients

Ripolarizzazione precoce. Non così innocente come si pensava

Prevalence and QT Interval of Early Repolarization. in a Hospital-based Population

Use of Signal Averaged ECG and Spectral Analysis of Heart Rate Variability in Antiarrhythmic Therapy of Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia

Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes

Transcription:

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 40, No. 2, 2002 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/02/$22.00 Published by Elsevier Science Inc. PII S0735-1097(02)01962-9 Genotype-Phenotype Relationship in Brugada Syndrome: Electrocardiographic Features Differentiate SCN5A-Related Patients From Non SCN5A-Related Patients Jeroen P. P. Smits, MD,* Lars Eckardt, MD, Vincent Probst, MD, Connie R. Bezzina, PHD,* Jean Jacques Schott, PHD, Carol Ann Remme, MD,* Wilhelm Haverkamp, MD, Günter Breithardt, MD, Denis Escande, MD, PHD, Eric Schulze-Bahr, MD, Hervé LeMarec, MD, PHD, Arthur A. M. Wilde, MD, PHD* Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Münster, Germany; and Nantes, France OBJECTIVES BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS We have tested whether a genotype-phenotype relationship exists in Brugada syndrome (BS) by trying to distinguish BS patients with (carriers) and those without (non-carriers) a mutation in the gene encoding the cardiac sodium channel (SCN5A) using clinical parameters. Brugada syndrome is an inherited cardiac disease characterized by a varying degree of ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads and (non)specific conduction disorders. In a minority of patients, SCN5A mutations can be found. Genetic heterogeneity has been demonstrated, but other causally related genes await identification. If a genotype-phenotype relationship exists, this might facilitate screening. In a multi-center study, we have collected data on demographics, clinical history, family history, electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, His to ventricle interval (HV), and ECG parameters after pharmacologic challenge with I Na blocking drugs for BS patients with (n 23), or those without (n 54), an identified SCN5A mutation. No differences were found in demographics, clinical history, or family history. Carriers had a significantly longer PQ interval on the baseline ECG and a significantly longer HV time. A PQ interval of 210 ms and an HV interval 60 ms seem to be predictive for the presence of an SCN5A mutation. After I Na blocking drugs, carriers had significantly longer PQ and QRS intervals and more increase in QRS duration. We observed significantly longer conduction intervals on baseline ECG in patients with established SCN5A mutations (PQ and HV interval and, upon class I drugs, more QRS increase). These results concur with the observed loss of function of mutated BS-related sodium channels. Brugada syndrome patients with, and those without, an SCN5A mutation can be differentiated by phenotypical differences. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:350 6) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Brugada syndrome (BS) presents with malignant ventricular arrhythmias occurring in the structurally normal heart, leading to (aborted) sudden death. The hallmark electrocardiographic (ECG) feature of the disorder is ST-segment See page 357 elevation in the right precordial leads (1 3). This ECG feature may not, however, be consistently present, and transient normalization of the ST segment is commonly From the *Experimental and Molecular Cardiology Group, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik C (Kardiologie/Angiologie) Universitätsklinikum, Institut f. Arterioskleroseforschung an der Universität Münster, Münster, Germany; and INSERM U533, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France. Supported by grant no. 902-16-193 from ZonMW (the Netherlands Organization for Health Research), the Hague, project 27 of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute (ICIN), Utrecht, the Netherlands, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-556-TPA1, C4 Sch 1082/ 2-2), Bonn, and the Alfried-Krupp-von-Bohlen-Halbach Foundation, Essen, Germany. Manuscript received January 8, 2002; revised manuscript received March 26, 2002, accepted April 17, 2002. observed (3,4). Other characteristic ECG features include a terminal negative T-wave in the right precordial leads and specific (i.e., left anterior hemiblock, right bundle branch block) or non-specific (QRS widening) conduction disorders. This phenotype is increasingly recognized as an inherited trait and is classified among the familial primary electrical disorders (5). Mutations in the gene encoding the pore-forming subunit of the cardiac sodium channel, SCN5A, have been causally linked in patients and families with BS (6,7). In an effort to clarify the underlying pathophysiology, several mutated sodium channels associated with the disorder have been studied in heterologous expression systems. In all cases, a reduction in sodium (Na )-current amplitude (I Na ), either by a reduction in Na channel expression or through alterations in channel gating properties (7), is predicted. Clinically, a reduced Na current is expected to impact on conduction properties. An SCN5A mutation, however, is found only in a minority ( 15%) of patients (8). Genetic heterogeneity is also evidenced by linkage to a region on chromosome 3

JACC Vol. 40, No. 2, 2002 July 17, 2002:350 6 Smits et al. Genotype-Phenotype Relationship in Brugada Syndrome 351 Abbreviations and Acronyms AUC area under the curve BS Brugada syndrome ECG electrocardiogram/electrocardiographic EPS electrophysiologic studies HR heart rate HV His to ventricle interval Na sodium SCN5A pore-forming region (alpha-subunit) of the human cardiac sodium channel SSCP single-strand conformation polymorphism (3p22-25), other than the SCN5A locus (3p21), in a family with the disorder (9). Genetic heterogeneity also underlies the different subtypes of the inherited long QT syndrome, in which the various forms are associated with mutations in multiple cardiac ion channel genes. In this disorder, clinical and ECG features display genotype-specific characteristics. Apart from shedding light on the pathophysiologic mechanisms of the various sub-types, this facilitates genetic screening (10), permits faster genetic testing, and thereby provides opportunities for earlier initiation of optimal patient management. It is unclear whether such a genotypephenotype relationship exists in BS. In this study, we have tested whether it is possible to distinguish between SCN5Amutation carriers and patients without a sodium channel mutation on the basis of clinical and ECG criteria. METHODS Patient population. Patients diagnosed with BS at the following three university hospitals were included: Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (The Netherlands); the University of Münster, Münster (Germany) and Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (France). All tests that were performed were approved by the medical ethical review committees of the hospitals involved. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. Clinical data, including age at diagnosis, gender, (non) pharmacologic therapy and family history, were obtained retrospectively from patient records from the respective hospitals. Patients without a suspected index event but with a malignant family history were diagnosed with BS based on the presence of ECG characteristics consisting of at least 2-mm ST-segment elevation in leads V 1 to V 3 and (in)complete right bundle branch block morphology. In patients with aborted cardiac arrest, 1 mm was sufficient. Underlying (structural) heart disease was excluded by echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, chest roentgenograms, and exercise testing. In addition, laboratory tests to exclude (acute) ischemia and metabolic or electrolyte disturbances were performed. In total, 77 patients were studied, all of whom were genetically tested for the presence of an SCN5A mutation. In order to avoid the predominant effect of any single mutation, only index patients from each family (and no other affected family members) were included. ECG, electrophysiologic measurements, and sodium channel blocking drugs. The first 12-lead ECG available in the absence of drugs was analyzed. Heart rate (HR), PQ, QRS and QT intervals were measured. The QT interval was corrected using Bazett s formula (QTc QT/ RR). The maximal ST-segment elevation in leads V 1 to V 3 was measured. Baseline electrophysiologic studies (EPS) were performed in 46 (eight SCN5A-related and 38 non SCN5A-related) of 77 patients. The His to ventricle interval (HV) and inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias, using up to two extra stimuli, were registered. The effect of Na channel blocking drugs was tested in 53 (11 SCN5A-related and 42 non SCN5A-related) of 77 patients. In three patients, pre-existing ECG abnormalities were considered too severe for safe testing of these drugs. Two patients refused the test. The choice of drug was determined by the availability of the drug in the hospitals concerned. In 28 patients, ajmaline (1 mg/kg body weight intravenous at a rate of 10 mg/min) was used; in 23 patients, flecainide (2 mg/kg body weight intravenous in 10 min with a maximum of 150 mg) was used; and in two patients, procainamide (10 mg/kg intravenous at a rate of 100 mg/min) was used. The same ECG measurements as before were performed after administration of the sodium channel blocking drugs. Mutation analysis of SCN5A. In all patients, all 28 exons of SCN5A were amplified by polymerase chain reaction from DNA isolated from peripheral leukocytes, utilizing intronic primers. Polymerase chain reaction products were subjected to single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis followed by direct sequence analysis of aberrant conformers (11). In order to increase the probability of detecting the presence of any sequence change, SSCP was carried out at two different temperatures for each exon, and the size of fragments for SSCP was kept around 300 base pairs (12,13). Statistical analysis. The Student t test or Mann-Whitney test was performed, where appropriate, to test for statistical differences between two mean values. A paired t test was used for the evaluation of changes in ECG parameters before and after sodium channel blocking drugs, with p values of 0.05 considered statistically significant. Proportional differences between groups were analyzed using the Fisher exact test. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiveroperator curves were computed to select possible cut points in the measured values and test for the diagnostic utility of these. RESULTS Patient population and mutation analysis of SCN5A. The population consisted of a total of 77 patients, 23 SCN5A-related (Table 1) and 54 non SCN5A-related pa-

352 Smits et al. JACC Vol. 40, No. 2, 2002 Genotype-Phenotype Relationship in Brugada Syndrome July 17, 2002:350 6 Table 1. Included SCN5A Mutations E161K R535X G1319V R1512W 951X G752R S1382I IVS21 1G A R367C L867X V1405L G1743E M369K E1225K G1406R A1924T 1479delK delg 3816 G1502S From two families two symptomatic index persons were included. Two other mutations were identified in two unrelated families (proven by haplotype analysis). tients, respectively. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 2. The male:female ratio was not significantly different between the two groups. Within the whole group, the age at diagnosis was on average eight years younger in males compared with females: 45.1 11.2 years versus 53.0 11.7 years (p 0.05). Among SCN5A-mutation carriers, males were on average 13 years younger than females: 40.9 9 years versus 53.6 6 years (p 0.05). Because no further significant differences between males and females regarding index event and ECG parameters could be found, these groups were not studied separately in subsequent analyses. No significant differences in age, family history, and index event were observed between mutation carriers and non-carriers (Table 2). ECG parameters and electrophysiologic measurements. The SCN5A-related patients showed a longer PQ interval on their baseline 12-lead ECG compared with non SCN5A-related patients (209 51 ms vs. 163 23 ms [p 0.0001]; Table 2; Fig. 1A). No significant differences were observed in HR, QRS duration, QTc interval and ST-segment elevation (Table 2). Patients with a mutation in SCN5A were found to have a significantly longer HV interval, as measured during EPS (66 13 ms), than patients without an SCN5A mutation (48 9ms[p 0.001]) (Table 2; Fig. 1B). Ventricular fibrillation or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia was induced during programmed electrophysiologic stimulation in the majority of both SCN5A-related (6 of 8, 75%) and non SCN5A-related patients (27 of 38; 71%) who underwent EPS (p NS). No difference between the HV interval of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients was observed (data not shown). Sodium channel blocking drugs. Both within the total tested patient population (n 51 [excluding the 2 patients who were tested using procainamide]) as within the non SCN5A-related patient group (n 41), no significant differences between ajmaline and flecainide could be observed. Within the SCN5A-related patient group, six patients received flecainide, and four received ajmaline. Also, no difference could be observed. Procainamide was used in one SCN5A-related and one non SCN5A-related patient. Because previous authors have also reported that they could not find significant differences in effects of these drugs on ECG parameters (4), we did not distinguish between the different drugs in our analysis. No differences in basic patient characteristics (ECG, index event, and so forth) were observed between patients challenged and patients not challenged. In SCN5A-related patients, Na channel blocking drugs elicited a significant increase in PQ-interval, QRS-duration, and ST-segment elevation (Table 3). Similarly, in non SCN5A-related patients, administration of Na channel blocking drugs caused a significant increase in PQ interval, QRS duration, and ST-segment elevation (Table 3). In addition, in these patients, HR and QTc interval were also found to be increased (Table 3). After administration of Na channel blocking drugs, the difference in PQ interval between SCN5A-related and non SCN5A-related patients was maintained; SCN5Arelated patients had a significantly longer PQ interval than non SCN5A-related patients (222 37 ms vs. 195 33 ms [p 0.05]). In addition, a difference in QRS duration became evident between SCN5A-related and non SCN5Arelated patients after drug administration; SCN5A-related patients had a significantly longer QRS interval than non SCN5A-related patients (142 31 ms vs. 118 21 ms [p 0.05]) (Table 3). No significant differences between the two groups were observed regarding changes in HR, QTcinterval, and ST-segment elevation (Table 3). Interestingly, when comparing the effects of Na channel blockade between SCN5A-related and non SCN5A-related patients, a significantly larger increase in QRS duration in the former group was observed (38 31 ms vs.18 18 ms [p 0.05]) (Table 3). Table 2. Characteristics of Patients With or Without SCN5A Mutation Brugada Patients With SCN5A Mutation Brugada Patients Without SCN5A Mutation p Value Total (n) 23 54 Gender (m/f) 15/8 44/10 NS Age (yrs) 45 15 48 11 NS Family history 11/23 (48%) 24/54 (44%) NS Index event VF/VT 6/23 (26%) 15/54 (28%) NS Syncope 8/23 (35%) 19/54 (35%) NS Asymptomatic 7/23 (30%) 15/54 (28%) NS Others* 2/23 (9%) 5/54 (9%) NS Baseline ECG (n) 23 54 Heart rate (beats/min 1 ) 67 15 71 12 NS PQ interval (ms) 209 51 163 24 0.0001 QRS duration (ms) 110 24 102 22 NS QTc interval (ms 1/2 ) 405 31 400 35 NS ST-segment elevation 2.5 1.3 1.9 1.3 NS (mm) Electrophysiologic testing (n) 8 38 VT/VF inducible 6/8 (75%) 27/38 (71%) NS HV time 66 13 48 9 0.001 Values are mean SD. *palpitations, unknown. ECG electrocardiogram; HV His to ventricle interval; SCN5A poreforming region of the human cardiac sodium channel; VF ventricular fibrillation; VT ventricular tachycardia.

JACC Vol. 40, No. 2, 2002 July 17, 2002:350 6 Smits et al. Genotype-Phenotype Relationship in Brugada Syndrome 353 Figure 1. (A) PQ interval (ms) on baseline ECG for individual patients. Patients with a pore-forming region (alpha-subunit) of the human cardiac sodium channel (SCN5A) mutation were found to have a significantly longer PQ interval than patients without an SCN5A mutation. Solid circle Brugada syndrome patients with known SCN5A mutation; open circle mean SEM; open square Brugada syndrome patients without known SCN5A mutation; solid square mean SEM. (B) His to ventricle interval (HV) time (ms) for individual patients. Patients with an SCN5A mutation were found to have a significantly longer HV interval than patients without an SCN5A mutation. Solid circle Brugada syndrome patients with known SCN5A mutation; open circle mean SEM; open square Brugada syndrome patients without known SCN5A mutation; solid square mean SEM. DISCUSSION In this study we investigated whether a genotype-phenotype relationship exists in BS. Probing this issue is of interest because, if such a correlation exists, it might facilitate future genetic screening in patients with the disorder. Several mutations linked to BS have been described in SCN5A, the only gene hitherto linked to the disorder (7). In vitro studies on implicated mutations have consistently shown a reduction in Na current either by a decrease in cell-surface expression or by a reduction of unitary current secondary to altered biophysical properties (7). This points toward the likely involvement of altered Na-current characteristics in the generation of both the ST-segment elevation and ventricular arrhythmias (14). Decreased net inward (or an increased net outward) current at the end of phase 1 of the cardiac action potential is thought to underlie epicardial action potential shortening by aggravating the natural difference in repolarization characteristics of endocardium and epicardium, with resultant ST-segment elevation in the leads overlying the respective area (5,14). The resultant electrical heterogeneity in action potential between epicardial and endocardial layers is expected to be arrhythmogenic (5,14). The sodium current, however, not only impacts on action potential duration but also plays an important role in propagating the action potential. Hence, a reduction in Na current is also expected to negatively affect conduction within the heart. As a matter of fact, SCN5A mutations have Table 3. ECG Before and After Class I Antiarrhythmic Drug Challenge Brugada Patients With SCN5A Mutation Brugada Patients Without SCN5A Mutation p Value ECG before class I antiarrhythmic drug (n) 11 42 HR (beats/min 1 ) 65 16 72 12* NS PQ interval (ms) 195 40* 164 27 0.005 QRS duration (ms) 104 26 100 17 NS QTc interval (ms 1/2 ) 402 28 405 34 NS ST-segment elevation (mm) 2.3 1.6 1.8 1.0 NS ECG after class I antiarrhythmic drug (n) 11 42 HR (beats/min 1 ) 72 17 76 13* NS PQ interval (ms) 222 37* 195 33 0.05 QRS duration (ms) 142 31 118 21 0.05 QTc interval (ms 1/2 ) 426 60 431 40 NS ST-segment elevation (mm) 4.5 1.1 3.9 1.2 NS Difference in ECG parameters after class I antiarrhythmic drug (n) 11 42 HR (beats/min 1 ) 10 15 4 12 NS PQ interval (ms) 26 28 32 21 NS QRS duration (ms) 38 31 18 18 0.05 QTc interval (ms 1/2 ) 23 64 27 40 NS ST-segment elevation (mm) 2.2 1.4 2.1 1.3 NS Values are mean SD. *p 0.05; p 0.005; p 0.0001. ECG electrocardiogram; HR heart rate; SCN5A pore-forming region (alpha-subunit) of the human cardiac sodium channel.

354 Smits et al. JACC Vol. 40, No. 2, 2002 Genotype-Phenotype Relationship in Brugada Syndrome July 17, 2002:350 6 Figure 2. (A) Receiver operating characteristic curve comparing sensitivity and specificity of the baseline PQ interval and the presence of an SCN5A-mutation. Select PQ intervals are indicated. Below are positive predictive value and negative predictive value of various cut points of PQ interval. (B) Receiver operating curve comparing sensitivity and specificity of the His to ventricle interval (HV) and the presence of an SCN5A mutation. Select HV intervals are indicated. Below are positive predictive value and negative predictive value of various cut points of HV interval. AUC area under the curve. also been shown to underlie familial conduction disease (15,16). It is therefore not unexpected that conduction disorders are found in BS patients with an SCN5A mutation. Indeed, the prolonged PQ interval at the baseline ECG observed in our SCN5A-mutation carriers (likely partially due to the significantly prolonged HV interval in these individuals) supports the role for Na channel in conduction (5). Also, though not statistically significant,

JACC Vol. 40, No. 2, 2002 July 17, 2002:350 6 Smits et al. Genotype-Phenotype Relationship in Brugada Syndrome 355 QRS duration tended to be longer in SCN5A mutation carriers. Moreover, these ECG parameters are predictive for the presence or absence of an SCN5A mutation in BS patients (Figs. 1 and 2). When a PQ interval of 210 ms or more is considered to predict the presence of an SCN5A-related defect, a sensitivity of 48% and specificity of 98% is reached (Fig. 1A). In parallel, when an HV interval of 60 ms or more is considered to predict the presence of an SCN5A mutation, a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 82% are attained (Fig. 1B), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.788 for the baseline PQ duration (Fig. 2A) and 0.875 for the HV interval (Fig. 2B). These two parameters have a fair-to-good accuracy as a test for predicting the presence or absence of an SCN5A mutation within the patient group diagnosed with BS. Administration of Na channel blocking drugs to BS patients in general (i.e., whether they are SCN5A-related or non SCN5A-related patients) is expected to interfere with the ion current underlying phase 1 of the cardiac action potential, thereby exacerbating the ST-segment elevation. Patients without mutation in SCN5A may also develop conduction delay after challenge with Na channel blocking agents, as has been shown both for individuals with and individuals without BS (17,18). However, patients with an SCN5A mutation and, thus, preexistent reduced sodium current are expected to be the most susceptible to development (or further development) of conduction delay. Our finding, that SCN5A-mutation carriers show a larger increase in QRS duration after Na-channel blockade than non SCN5A-related patients, confirms this hypothesis. In addition to the PQ interval at baseline, the PQ and QRS intervals after Na-channel blockade are predictive of the presence or absence of an SCN5A mutation: both a PQ-interval of 225 ms and a QRS interval of 140 ms (abnormal prolongation in both cases) predict the presence of an SCN5A mutation. The PQ and QRS interval after Na blocking drugs are less accurate predictors for the presence or absence of an SCN5A mutation (parameters with AUC 0.716 [0.543 to 0.889] [p 0.01] and 0.733 [0.549 to 0.916] [p 0.01], respectively [not shown]). It has been noted before (17) that patients with longer baseline QRS intervals developed more QRS prolongation upon flecainide exposure than patients with normal baseline QRS intervals: a difference in underlying genotype was suggested. Na-channel blocking drugs, however, do not seem to differentiate between the two groups of patients when only the magnitude of the ST-segment elevation is considered (not shown). We were also not able to distinguish the two groups on the basis of other characteristics such as gender, age, family history, or index event; nor was the inducibility of ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia different between the two groups. The SCN5A mutation is reported to be found in only 15% of BS patients, and other gene(s) associated with the disorder have yet to be identified (8). Based on the proposed mechanism, involving exacerbation of transmural heterogeneity in action potential duration, both for ST-segment elevation and for the genesis of arrhythmias, likely candidate genes for the disorder are those encoding components (pore-forming or ancillary) of ion channels active around phase 1 of the action potential. In particular, this applies to genes displaying a transmural gradient in expression. Potential candidates include the modulatory subunits of the sodium channel, the pore-forming and modulatory components of the transient outward current, and the L-type calcium current. However, the disorder may be more complex. The region on chromosome 3 (3p22-25) linked to BS appears to contain none of these candidates, nor ion channel components that could represent homologues of these proteins (9). Furthermore, our study indicates that BS patients without an SCN5A mutation are expected to have normal or near-normal cardiac conduction. This suggests that the as-yet-unidentified causative gene(s) in these patients (most probably a heterogeneous group) have no impact (or a smaller impact) on conduction. Study limitations. Although SSCP conditions for enhanced detection of mutations were used, the SSCP analysis technique is known to be less than 100% sensitive and varies between 70% and 95% (12,13). Moreover, we analyzed the coding regions of SCN5A for mutations. One cannot exclude the possibility of mutations occurring in regions of the gene other than coding regions. The functional impact has not been studied for all identified SCN5A mutations; therefore, a causal relationship in individual patients has not been proved. Conclusions. In this study we show that the presence of conduction defects, as evidenced by a prolonged HV interval and PQ interval at baseline, and excessive QRS interval prolongation after Na -channel blockade are more likely to be found in BS patients who are carriers of an SCN5A mutation. This represents the first step toward the identification of genotype-specific sub-types in BS that, although other responsible gene(s) have yet to be identified, will eventually facilitate genetic screening and earlier initiation of optimal therapeutic strategies. Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Arthur A. M. Wilde, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, M-0-052, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail: M.Kraaijenhof@AMC.UVA.NL. REFERENCES 1. Brugada P, Brugada J, Brugada P. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20:1391 6. 2. Brugada J, Brugada R, Brugada P. Right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in leads V 1 through V 3 : a marker for sudden

356 Smits et al. JACC Vol. 40, No. 2, 2002 Genotype-Phenotype Relationship in Brugada Syndrome July 17, 2002:350 6 death in patients without demonstrable structural heart disease. Circulation 1998;97:457 60. 3. Brugada J, Brugada P. Further characterization of the syndrome of right bundle branch block, ST segment elevation, and sudden cardiac death. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997;8:325 31. 4. Brugada R, Brugada J, Antzelevitch C, et al. Sodium channel blockers identify risk for sudden death in patients with ST-segment elevation and right bundle branch block but structurally normal hearts. Circulation 2000;101:510 5. 5. Alings M, Wilde A. Brugada syndrome: clinical data and suggested pathophysiological mechanism. Circulation 1999;99:666 73. 6. Chen Q, Kirsch GE, Zhang D, et al. Genetic basis and molecular mechanism for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Nature 1998;392:293 6. 7. Bezzina CR, Rook MB, Wilde AAM. Cardiac sodium channel and inherited arrhythmia syndromes. Cardiovasc Res 2001;49:257 71. 8. Priori SG, Napolitano C, Gasparini M, et al. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity of right bundle branch block and ST-segment elevation syndrome. Circulation 2000;102:2509 15. 9. Weiss R, Barmada MM, Nguyen T, et al. Clinical and molecular heterogeneity in the Brugada syndrome: a novel gene locus on chromosome 3. Circulation 2002;105:707 13. 10. Wilde AAM, Roden DM. Predicting the long-qt genotype from clinical data: from sense to science. Circulation 2000;102:2796 8. 11. Wang Q, Li Z, Shen J, Keating MT. Genomic organization of the human SCN5A gene encoding the cardiac sodium channel. Genomics 1996;34:9 16. 12. Grompe M. The rapid detection of unknown mutations in nucleic acids. Nat Genet 1993;5:111 7. 13. Jones AC, Austin J, Hansen N, et al. Optimal temperature selection for mutation detection by denaturing HPLC and comparison to single-stranded conformation polymorphism and heteroduplex analysis. Clin Chem 1999;45:1133 40. 14. Antzelevitch C. The Brugada syndrome: ionic basis and arrhythmia mechanisms. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001;12:268 72. 15. Schott J, Alshinawi C, Kyndt F, et al. Cardiac conduction defects associate with mutations in SCN5A. Nat Genet 1999;23:20 1. 16. Tan H, Bink-Boelkens M, Bezzina C, et al. A sodium-channel mutation causes isolated cardiac conduction disease. Nature 2001;409: 1043 7. 17. Shimizu W, Antzelevitch C, Suyama K, et al. Effect of sodium channel blockers on ST segment, QRS duration, and corrected QT interval in patients with Brugada syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2000; 11:1320 9. 18. Fujiki A, Masahiro U, Hidehiko N, et al. ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads induced with class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs: insight into the mechanism of Brugada syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1999;10:214 8.